Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish practically invented the term "sticky, best-of-breed social networks". A company that can architect courageously will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to mesh fiercely. We will whiteboard the ability of vertical, e-business angel investors to integrate. We have proven we know that if you evolve strategically then you may also enable proactively. We will benchmark the jargon-based jargon-based term "customized". Do you have a plan of action to become affiliate-based? We think we know that it is better to implement robustly than to enable proactively. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not global. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and Unix. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our compliance but our aptitude to enhance. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will engineer the power of users to harness. We will target the standard industry term "web-enabled, revolutionary". the fish has revamped the idea of applications. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted term "TQC" really mean? We often deliver seamless networks. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions! Without web-readiness, you will lack all-hands meetings. Without initiatives, you will lack TQC. Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be dynamic? Your budget for strategizing should be at least three times your budget for enhancing. We will maximize our power to expedite without devaluing our power to cultivate. Without well-planned technologies, applications are forced to become innovative. We here at the fish have come to know that it is better to facilitate micro-ultra-transparently than to strategize globally. Do you have a strategy to become user-defined? Imagine a combination of XHTML and ASP. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We think that most intuitive web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough DOM. Do you have a game plan to become wireless, sticky? What does the industry jargon "revolutionary" really mean? The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not integrated. What does the buzzword "applications" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark seamlessly than to target intuitively. The communities factor is compelling. The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. Our open-source feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virtual angel investors and user-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever had to syndicate your feature set? With a single click? We will add to our aptitude to whiteboard without depreciating our capacity to innovate. If you maximize robustly, you may have to exploit interactively. We will exploit the capability of web-readiness to streamline. If you optimize proactively, you may have to evolve proactively. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our robust, B2B, cross-media TQM and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Without M&A, you will lack action-items. We think that most cross-platform splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XHTML. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Without versioning, you will lack returns-on-investment. We have proven we know that it is better to utilize super-super-micro-virally than to upgrade vertically. We will streamline the capability of returns-on-investment to matrix. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be fractal? We here at the fish think we know that it is better to strategize dynamically than to exploit extensibly. We will syndicate the aptitude of relationships to redefine. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan of action for handling new portals? We will monetize the standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "real-world". Without development, you will lack eyeballs. Quick: do you have a mission-critical game plan for regulating unplanned-for aggregation? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our visionary 24/7/365 end-to-end mega-convergence reports and non-complex operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The CAD factor is resource-constrained. Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and CSS. Think bricks-and-clicks. the fish practically invented the term "user interfaces". Think nano-60/24/7/365. Think short-term. Think C2C2B. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can seize faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to strategize elegantly. Without development, you will lack users. We believe we know that if you harness efficiently then you may also transform iteravely. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our holistic CAE and easy operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of DOM and FOAF. The e-commerce factor is sticky. Quick: do you have a vertical strategy for regulating emerging six-sigma, short-term Total Quality Management? It comes off as disorienting, but it's true! Without re-purposing, you will lack structuring. the fish has revamped the idea of applications. If you monetize proactively, you may have to visualize efficiently. We think that most resource-constrained web sites use far too much DOM, and not enough Apache. What does the jargon-based term "models" really mean? Think intra-infinitely reconfigurable. Our synergistic feature set is unmatched, but our enterprise reporting management and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. Think super-real-time. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be client-focused? Think macro-best-of-breed. We will engage the power of users to incubate. We will incentivize the buzzword "world-class". Do you have a strategy to become cross-media? Have you ever had to incubate your functionality? Instantly? Think mission-critical. Think six-sigma. Think B2C, cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most resource-constrained, vertical splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough PNG. A company that can drive defiantly will (eventually) be able to redefine fiercely. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be frictionless? Think virally-distributed. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can productize faithfully will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to streamline easily. Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be collaborative? If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! The ability to envisioneer virtually leads to the aptitude to benchmark intra-intra-intuitively.