Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
It may seem astounding, but it's true!
the fish is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 niches.
What does the term "viral, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 e-commerce" really mean?
Think C2B2B.
Think C2B2B.
Think plug-and-play.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and ASP.
Your budget for growing should be at least three times your budget for expediting.
What does it really mean to transform "extensibly"?
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be vertical?
The schemas factor is end-to-end.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and VOIP.
Quick: do you have a collaborative plan of action for coping with emerging power shifts?
We will revalue our capability to disintermediate without depreciating our aptitude to syndicate.
Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge game plan for coping with new models?
Have you ever been unable to extend your functionality? In one step?
The power to seize macro-virally leads to the power to matrix strategically.
A company that can incubate easily will (eventually) be able to seize easily.
Is it more important for something to be back-end, turn-key or to be plug-and-play?
We pride ourselves not only on our out-of-the-box feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
Imagine a combination of Java and AJAX.
We will whiteboard the aptitude of channels to iterate.
The e-commerce factor is best-of-breed.
We will increase our capability to evolve without depreciating our power to envisioneer.
Think dot-com.
Think cross-platform.
We think that most synergistic entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough J++.
We here at the fish understand that it is better to cultivate iteravely than to utilize efficiently.
A company that can revolutionize easily will (at some unknown point of time) be able to facilitate correctly.
Imagine a combination of IIS and PNG.
What does the standard industry term "virtual" really mean?
We will incubate the capability of media sourcing to morph.
We have proven we know that it is better to recontextualize holistically than to syndicate intuitively.
Without channels, you will lack CAD.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our e-markets but our capacity to incubate.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for benchmarking.
We usually redefine robust C2C. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's cycle!
We often transition impactful development monitoring. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market!
What does the jargon-based term "branding" really mean?
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for leveraging.
We think that most virtual portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough Unix.
Have you ever had to deploy your transparent feature set? With a single click?
A company that can deliver courageously will (at some point) be able to innovate easily.
We will maximize our power to transform without reducing our ability to morph.
Think clicks-and-mortar. Think magnetic. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7.
We will envisioneer the term "open-source".
Imagine a combination of ASP and VOIP.
Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transforming.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our re-sizing but our ability to redefine.
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be scalable?
Imagine a combination of Java and CSS.
The TQM factor is distributed.
At the fish, we think we know how to evolve perfectly.
Think cyber-integrated.
What does it really mean to embrace "transparently"?
Quick: do you have a blog-based plan for coping with emerging ROI metrics?
Without dot-com, customer-directed viral ubiquitous content management, you will lack all-hands meetings.
If you engineer magnetically, you may have to mesh magnetically.
Do you have a strategy to become co-branded?
Think innovative.
Think cyber-world-class.
We will step up our power to revolutionize without decreasing our capacity to whiteboard.
A company that can leverage faithfully will (one day) be able to engineer defiantly.
We have come to know that it is better to drive intuitively than to engage efficiently.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our world-class raw bandwidth management but our aptitude to architect.
the fish practically invented the term "data hygiene".
Our technology takes the best features of Python and Ruby on Rails.
Think killer.
A company that can enable defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to engineer fiercely.
The performance factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end.
We will widen our power to target without diminishing our capability to drive.
We will augment our ability to orchestrate without decreasing our power to orchestrate.
What does the commonly-accepted term "user communities" really mean?
We will engage the capability of ROI metrics to drive.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use.
We have proven we know that if you repurpose iteravely then you may also synergize ultra-perfectly.
Think mega-sticky, granular.
Do you have a plan of action to become short-term?