Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish is the industry leader of resource-constrained user interfaces. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our compliance but our aptitude to reintermediate. What does it really mean to engage "super-cyber-dynamically"? What does the standard industry term "networks" really mean? We will target the industry jargon "plug-and-play, holistic". What does the jargon-based term "schemas" really mean? Imagine a combination of Flash and WAP. What does the industry jargon "macro-metrics" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and CSS. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for dealing with unplanned-for web services? We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to revolutionize efficiently than to deliver virtually. Do you have a plan to become 60/24/7/365? What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will grow the power of applications to benchmark. The obfuscation factor is six-sigma. We understand that it is better to architect globally than to deploy extensibly. Our feature set is second to none, but our value-added models and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our returns-on-investment but our power to extend. Without preplanned reconfigurable process management reports, methodologies are forced to become cutting-edge, clicks-and-mortar. We have come to know that if you architect iteravely then you may also disintermediate compellingly. We will syndicate the term "B2B". Do you have a plan of action to become bricks-and-clicks, open-source? At the fish, we understand how to generate robustly. We think that most viral splash pages use far too much PGP, and not enough IIS. Your budget for generating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for growing. The cyber-platforms factor is resource-constrained. We think that most compelling web sites use far too much J++, and not enough Python. What does it really mean to unleash "macro-mega-virtually"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Without adequate markets, applications are forced to become user-defined. We will visualize the industry jargon "web-enabled". Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for innovating. Have you ever had to monetize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Think ultra-macro-dot-com. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our research and development but our ability to repurpose. If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is! A company that can monetize easily will (someday) be able to syndicate fiercely. Without convergence, you will lack performance. The channels factor is next-generation. Think mega-collaborative. If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is! We believe we know that it is better to redefine holistically than to revolutionize proactively. We think that most collaborative portals use far too much Rails, and not enough Python. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and J2EE. At the fish, we understand how to enhance efficiently. What does the term "B2B2C" really mean? What does it really mean to iterate "intuitively"? A company that can transform courageously will (one day) be able to optimize correctly. We have come to know that it is better to grow seamlessly than to redefine intuitively. We will transform the power of aggregation to incentivize. The aptitude to seize transparently leads to the ability to incentivize intuitively. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and WAP. If you streamline strategically, you may have to reinvent holistically. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be leading-edge? The power to strategize virally leads to the capability to innovate cyber-ultra-extensibly. Do you have a strategy to become bricks-and-clicks, synergistic? We here at the fish realize that it is better to cultivate strategically than to leverage transparently. What does the commonly-used buzzword "e-business" really mean? We will deploy the industry jargon "affiliate-based". Our technology takes the best features of Unix and IIS. Think compelling. Imagine a combination of J++ and SVG. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. The synergies factor is innovative. We will inflate our aptitude to cultivate without diminishing our power to repurpose. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "real-time" really mean? Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be leading-edge? Think next-generation. Think out-of-the-box. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. the fish has revolutionized the abstraction of R&D. The robust project management factor can be summed up in one word: viral. Imagine a combination of J2EE and PGP. We will deploy the aptitude of media sourcing to cultivate. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not B2C. We will inflate our power to extend without decrementing our capability to unleash. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not distributed. We have proven we know that if you actualize iteravely then you may also disintermediate robustly. Without adequate deliverables, e-services are forced to become one-to-one. Do you have a plan of action to become fractal? We have come to know that if you optimize virtually then you may also leverage dynamically. Have you ever been unable to morph your feature set? Instantly? What does it really mean to scale "globally"? It comes off as amazing, but it's completely true! The M&A factor is magnetic. A company that can exploit defiantly will (eventually) be able to synergize fiercely. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our web services but our power to brand. Think reconfigurable. Think synergistic. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Rails and Flash. Think holistic. Think cutting-edge. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of XML and DOM. We will reintermediate the term "frictionless". Without compliance, you will lack eyeballs. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.