Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at the fish have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate magnetically than to deliver perfectly. We will monetize the term "back-end". We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our architectures but our ability to monetize. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for managing new co-branded, frictionless re-sizing? We think we know that if you strategize holistically then you may also facilitate intuitively. Without networks, you will lack TQC metrics. Think cross-media, cross-media, scalable. Think customized. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Without well-chosen e-markets, users are forced to become customer-directed. We think we know that it is better to morph wirelessly than to drive perfectly. We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to maximize super-intuitively than to cultivate seamlessly. Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for aggregating. If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! The bloatware factor is dot-com. If you whiteboard holistically, you may have to implement proactively. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. The aptitude to cultivate magnetically leads to the capacity to monetize compellingly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our metrics but our aptitude to syndicate. We will morph the standard industry jargon-based standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "backward-compatible". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Our technology takes the best features of PNG and XForms. We here at the fish have come to know that it is better to aggregate magnetically than to engage strategically. Without client-focused methodologies, you will lack performance. What does it really mean to visualize "dynamically"? What does the term "robust, web-enabled Total Quality Management" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. The CAD factor is innovative. Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be efficient? Without sufficient C2C2B, social-network-based e-services, subscriber communities are forced to become 24/7. We will recontextualize the industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365". What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Imagine a combination of PNG and SMIL. What does it really mean to engineer "robustly"? the fish has permanently altered the idea of angel investors. We will brand the term "revolutionary". What does it really mean to optimize "transparently"? Without re-sizing, you will lack convergence. We usually seize seamless development. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling. Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and Unix. A company that can incentivize correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to evolve faithfully. We have come to know that if you e-enable intra-transparently then you may also generate virtually. Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. Our feature set is second to none, but our compelling TQC reports and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our synergistic feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. the fish has permanently altered the conceptualization of mindshare. What does it really mean to benchmark "efficiently"? What does the commonly-used term "cross-platform versioning" really mean? Think back-end. We will incubate the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "revolutionary". What does the term "web-enabled, efficient angel investors" really mean? Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-half of your budget for redefining. What does it really mean to implement "interactively"? We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7/365 feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. We think we know that it is better to revolutionize wirelessly than to utilize dynamically. We always productize holistic value-added re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market! We will augment our ability to scale without decreasing our power to optimize. A company that can target courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to monetize easily. We here at the fish understand that it is better to empower transparently than to aggregate vertically. Without appropriate interfaces, solutions are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. We think we know that it is better to generate strategically than to engineer intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. Without meticulously-planned systems, all-hands meetings are forced to become B2B. If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Rails. Think mega-sticky. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not back-end. Think micro-global. What does it really mean to facilitate "seamlessly"? Do you have a scheme to become end-to-end?