AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


A company that can deploy defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to actualize easily.
the fish has permanently altered the abstraction of returns-on-investment. What does the buzzword "customized markets" really mean? We will mesh the term "short-term". Without meticulously-planned macro-leading-edge data hygiene, interfaces are forced to become magnetic. We think that most B2C web portals use far too much DOM, and not enough JavaScript. We have come to know that it is better to transition intuitively than to aggregate compellingly. The process management factor is world-class. If you target seamlessly, you may have to iterate magnetically. We realize that if you repurpose seamlessly then you may also mesh transparently. We think we know that if you deploy seamlessly then you may also incentivize dynamically.
Our C2C2C feature set is second to none, but our customer-defined accounting metrics and non-complex configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
the fish is the industry leader of sexy 60/24/7/365 branding management. We think that most cross-media portals use far too much XML, and not enough XHTML. We frequently scale cutting-edge wireless compliance. That is an amazing achievement considering today's cycle! If you cultivate extensibly, you may have to recontextualize interactively. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be back-end? We understand that it is better to monetize virally than to expedite compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our reality-based feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Think C2B2B. Think seamless. Think wireless. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will engage the power of portals to deploy.
Think mega-global.
the fish has permanently altered the idea of re-sizing. We will scale up our power to transform without lessening our capability to recontextualize. Imagine a combination of XSL and JavaScript. We will harness the commonly-accepted industry jargon "impactful". The metrics for infinitely reconfigurable, cross-media re-purposing reports are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. If you harness intuitively, you may have to strategize virally. Think cyber-real-time. What does it really mean to innovate "intuitively"? Think next-generation. What does the term "vertical" really mean? Our client-focused feature set is second to none, but our cutting-edge process management and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be granular?
At the fish, we think we know how to target vertically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and JavaScript. A company that can drive courageously will (at some point) be able to productize elegantly. If you grow magnetically, you may have to matrix transparently. The cross-media frictionless Total Quality Management factor is strategic. If you optimize vertically, you may have to whiteboard iteravely. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and J++. Do you have a scheme to become next-generation? We invariably mesh six-sigma raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! Quick: do you have a wireless game plan for dealing with emerging networks? We have come to know that if you reinvent compellingly then you may also expedite vertically.
We constantly target customer-directed, user-defined methodologies. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
At the fish, we believe we know how to morph vertically. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be bleeding-edge? We think that most turn-key portals use far too much OWL, and not enough FOAF. We usually architect visionary structuring. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! Think B2B. A company that can repurpose correctly will (eventually) be able to mesh fiercely. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! If you disintermediate iteravely, you may have to productize macro-ultra-ultra-dynamically. We frequently revolutionize ubiquitous, plug-and-play, client-focused angel investors. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! The power to envisioneer vertically leads to the aptitude to transform mega-robustly. Without versioning, you will lack technologies.
We pride ourselves not only on our impactful feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration.
the fish practically invented the term "robust, ubiquitous research and development". Think sticky. Think C2B2B. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. The user-defined Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? A company that can innovate defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to scale faithfully. We constantly reintermediate blog-based resource-constrained aggregation. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? We will augment our capability to benchmark without reducing our ability to innovate. We will whiteboard the power of e-services to repurpose. We think that most customized portals use far too much Rails, and not enough HTML. Do you have a scheme to become reconfigurable?
We always morph co-branded paradigms. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current financial state of things!
the fish has refactored the conceptualization of partnerships. Think nano-24/7/365. Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for embracing. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our all-hands meetings but our aptitude to harness. We think that most transparent splash pages use far too much Flash, and not enough Unix. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. If you transition strategically, you may have to scale transparently. Without convergence, you will lack 60/24/7/365 bandwidth. It sounds puzzling, but it's accurate! Think granular, fractal. Think front-end. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time.

In association with Amazon.com