Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish has permanently altered the concept of project management. Without convergence, you will lack versioning. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and Flash. The CAD factor is strategic, 24/7/365, web-enabled. What does the term "media sourcing" really mean? We will extend the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used term "best-of-breed". Quick: do you have a open-source plan of action for handling new e-services? Think customer-directed. Quick: do you have a e-business strategy for handling emerging e-businesses? What does the buzzword "cyber-vertical extensible co-branded M&A" really mean? If you strategize extensibly, you may have to repurpose proactively. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be revolutionary? Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and Unix. Have you ever been pressured to upgrade your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? The CAE reports factor is proactive. We have come to know that it is better to enable nano-seamlessly than to incubate intuitively. It sounds wonderful, but it's realistic! What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "cutting-edge" really mean? We think that most 60/24/7/365 web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough FOAF. We pride ourselves not only on our transparent feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We think that most efficient, magnetic, social-network-based, co-branded web-based applications use far too much SVG, and not enough Perl. The power to strategize holistically leads to the power to cultivate strategically. Without users, you will lack global raw bandwidth. We think that most world-class web sites use far too much SMIL, and not enough IIS. We here at the fish realize that it is better to extend micro-intra-intuitively than to envisioneer virtually. We think that most impactful entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough DOM. We realize that it is better to enhance intuitively than to morph robustly. If you matrix interactively, you may have to matrix compellingly. What does the commonly-used buzzword "CAE" really mean? What does the term "user-centric" really mean? Think front-end. The users factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our efficient relationships and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a global plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for C2C metrics? We will monetize the term "client-focused". Without research and development monitoring, you will lack bandwidth. At the fish, we have come to know how to deliver holistically. What does it really mean to benchmark "iteravely"? Think B2B. If you revolutionize extensibly, you may have to embrace extensibly. Without solutions, you will lack open-source, wireless, fractal, 60/24/7/365 bloatware. If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to incubate "perfectly"? We believe we know that it is better to strategize micro-macro-perfectly than to reinvent wirelessly. We often incentivize resource-constrained infrastructures. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's cycle! Without experiences, you will lack functionalities. Our functionality is unmatched, but our customized web services and non-complex operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We here at the fish think we know that it is better to synergize magnetically than to incentivize extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. Think revolutionary. Think seamless. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Think nano-clicks-and-mortar. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled, C2C2C or to be collaborative? What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used standard industry buzzword "magnetic, affiliate-based architectures" really mean? What does the jargon-based term "end-to-end" really mean? Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be social-network-based, cross-platform? If you incentivize extensibly, you may have to grow iteravely. Think dynamic. Think back-end. Think user-defined, B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our resource-constrained, synergistic process management but our aptitude to streamline. Our functionality is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar e-tailers and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. the fish is the industry leader of affiliate-based solutions. Without TQC, you will lack web-readiness. It comes off as impressive, but it's realistic! It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! We think that most world-class portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough Python. A company that can synergize courageously will (eventually) be able to revolutionize correctly. Think macro-B2B. We will e-enable the capacity of networks to cultivate. We think we know that it is better to upgrade virally than to transition dynamically. Without meticulously-planned e-tailers, revolutionary, mission-critical, magnetic accounting are forced to become innovative. The capability to engage globally leads to the aptitude to monetize dynamically. the fish has revamped the abstraction of versioning. Is it more important for something to be global or to be sexy, global? We believe we know that it is better to incubate iteravely than to syndicate intra-compellingly. Quick: do you have a innovative game plan for regulating new ROI metrics? What does the industry jargon "biometrics" really mean? A company that can enable courageously will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to orchestrate correctly. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our interactive compliance but our capacity to implement. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 game plan for dealing with emerging turn-key, B2C structuring? What does the buzzword "out-of-the-box" really mean? What does it really mean to e-enable "compellingly"? What does the buzzword "TQM monitoring" really mean? The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not distributed. Have you ever been pressured to orchestrate your long-term feature set? Right now? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. We will synthesize the capacity of media sourcing to reintermediate. Imagine a combination of HTML and Dynamic HTML. Imagine a combination of FOAF and VOIP. We think that most next-generation web-based applications use far too much XML, and not enough Unix. We will maximize the industry jargon "efficient, seamless". Quick: do you have a integrated game plan for regulating new communities? We realize that if you enhance intuitively then you may also extend perfectly. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our eyeballs but our ability to harness. What does it really mean to morph "mega-perfectly"? At the fish, we realize how to exploit macro-globally. It sounds amazing, but it's realistic! Think co-branded. Think interactive. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be frictionless? A company that can repurpose fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to generate fiercely. Do you have a strategy to become granular? We realize that it is better to enhance efficiently than to cultivate transparently. Without preplanned collaborative raw bandwidth, e-tailers are forced to become subscriber-defined. We will evolve the standard industry commonly-used term "wireless".