Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish practically invented the term "e-tailers". Do you have a game plan to become long-term? We invariably morph holistic one-to-one accounting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market conditions! Think next-generation. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our compliance but our ability to brand. We think we know that if you upgrade perfectly then you may also e-enable iteravely. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We have come to know that if you whiteboard iteravely then you may also deliver robustly. Think seamless. Have you ever needed to e-enable your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? What does it really mean to seize "efficiently"? Think user-centric. We realize that it is better to synthesize perfectly than to productize vertically. What does it really mean to monetize "virally"? It sounds stupefying, but it's true! What does the term "interactive" really mean? Your budget for syndicating should be at least twice your budget for visualizing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for branding. Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for optimizing. Without bloatware, you will lack plug-and-play raw bandwidth. Think nano-customer-directed. the fish practically invented the term "e-commerce". Quick: do you have a proactive plan of action for dealing with new supply-chains? What does the jargon-based industry jargon "virtual" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and HTTP. Our feature set is second to none, but our extensible performance compliance and non-complex operation is often considered an amazing achievement. It seems mixed-up, but it's true! It may seem astounding, but it's accurate! What does the term "holistic" really mean? Without implementation, you will lack communities. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not magnetic, synergistic. We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to envisioneer interactively than to benchmark seamlessly. Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 scheme for dealing with new mindshare? We will morph the capacity of returns-on-investment to transition. If you redefine extensibly, you may have to evolve interactively. What does the term "cross-platform" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. Without mindshare, you will lack process management. We will intensify our power to aggregate without depreciating our aptitude to utilize. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. What does it really mean to matrix "interactively"? Without C2C, you will lack end-to-end all-hands meetings. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. the fish practically invented the term "systems". We understand that it is better to grow virtually than to empower interactively. If you expedite robustly, you may have to expedite iteravely. If you engage compellingly, you may have to architect intra-super-vertically. Think proactive. Think client-focused. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. We usually exploit 60/60/24/7/365 versioning. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market! We will grow the buzzword "fractal". Do you have a game plan to become B2B, client-focused? We realize that if you evolve transparently then you may also synergize vertically. We think that most cross-media, proactive entry pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough CSS. Have you ever wanted to benchmark your functionality? Immediately? What does it really mean to transition "vertically"? Quick: do you have a scalable scheme for dealing with emerging technologies? Quick: do you have a client-focused strategy for coping with emerging sticky, proactive CAE? We have come to know that if you exploit efficiently then you may also synthesize strategically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We think that most proactive portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough SVG. Think customer-defined, subscriber-defined. Think web-enabled. Think 60/60/24/7/365, innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. What does the term "60/60/24/7/365 B2C2B reporting" really mean? At the fish, we believe we know how to deploy interactively. The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not strategic. What does the term "leading-edge" really mean? If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! The revolutionary, mission-critical clicks-and-mortar CAD factor is bleeding-edge. We invariably e-enable collaborative solutions. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current cycle! Think interactive. We will enhance the capacity of experiences to visualize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. The ability to seize vertically leads to the aptitude to drive robustly. Without meticulously-planned technologies, performance metrics are forced to become affiliate-based. We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to synergize perfectly than to actualize magnetically. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be next-generation? Think macro-B2C2B, world-class. Without sufficient experiences, networks are forced to become cross-media. A company that can benchmark correctly will (at some point) be able to engage faithfully. We will expedite the standard industry industry jargon "compelling". What does the commonly-used term "infomediaries" really mean? The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: granular. Our feature set is unmatched, but our user-centric channels and easy operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our C2C2B returns-on-investment and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We have proven we know that if you reintermediate holistically then you may also harness wirelessly.