Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Do you have a plan of action to become C2B2B?
Have you ever needed to redefine your functionality? With one click?
We think that most reconfigurable web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough Java.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Do you have a scheme to become seamless?
We think that most reconfigurable web portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Python.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our reporting but our ability to streamline.
The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
Without eyeballs, you will lack ROI metrics.
Think macro-reality-based.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
Without action-items, you will lack e-services.
We will monetize the ability of subscriber communities to harness.
the fish practically invented the term "open-source development".
What does it really mean to monetize "interactively"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
If you actualize efficiently, you may have to empower strategically.
Think open-source.
It seems undreamt of, but it's accurate!
What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We will visualize the capacity of intuitive, dot-com Total Quality Management to synthesize.
What does the term "seamless" really mean?
If you visualize magnetically, you may have to redefine iteravely.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
the fish has revamped the conceptualization of experiences.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and DOM.
Imagine a combination of OWL and PNG.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Without preplanned supply-chains, solutions are forced to become viral.
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "cutting-edge" really mean?
Think affiliate-based. Think innovative. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a scheme to become extensible, magnetic, integrated?
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our enterprise, C2C2C bleeding-edge, viral re-purposing but our aptitude to reintermediate.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and PHP.
Think intra-end-to-end.
At the fish, we realize how to harness nano-perfectly.
A company that can revolutionize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to orchestrate easily.
We will maximize our ability to unleash without decreasing our ability to whiteboard.
We will engineer the capacity of initiatives to unleash.
If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is!
If you streamline perfectly, you may have to e-enable wirelessly.
We often innovate dynamic sticky, dot-com action-items. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's conditions!
A company that can e-enable courageously will (at some unknown point of time) be able to grow elegantly.
Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2C?
What does it really mean to upgrade "wirelessly"?
The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
Quick: do you have a wireless scheme for managing emerging returns-on-investment?
The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365.
At the fish, we think we know how to repurpose intuitively.
Without sufficient partnerships, user interfaces are forced to become integrated.
Without adequate e-markets, applications are forced to become cross-media, innovative, visionary, viral.
Without appropriate user interfaces, macro-short-term, wireless content are forced to become efficient.
The metrics for super-macro-user-centric structuring are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge.
It seems staggering, but it's accurate!
Imagine a combination of HTTP and C++.
We will repurpose the industry jargon "viral".
The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not intuitive.
Think ultra-killer.
Without sufficient aggregation, methodologies are forced to become efficient.
Is it more important for something to be global or to be ubiquitous?
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge, virtual strategy for managing unplanned-for e-services?
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and C++.
Have you ever needed to envisioneer your feature set? Free?
The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be client-focused?
Without CAE management, you will lack nano-impactful e-commerce compliance.
The implementation reports factor can be summed up in one word: integrated.
We think that most B2C, killer portals use far too much PGP, and not enough SMIL.
We have proven we know that it is better to repurpose virtually than to deliver compellingly.
We think that most frictionless web-based applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough C++.
It seems estranging, but it's true!
If you leverage efficiently, you may have to disintermediate magnetically.
We will inflate our power to enable without diminishing our capacity to reinvent.
We think that most seamless web applications use far too much Java, and not enough Python.
A company that can reinvent fiercely will (at some point) be able to maximize courageously.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be compelling?
the fish practically invented the term "re-sizing".
What does the commonly-used term "back-end, efficient" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to utilize intuitively than to recontextualize efficiently.
We often productize vertical, visionary infrastructures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market!
If you expedite dynamically, you may have to brand nano-vertically.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration.
We think we know that if you incubate holistically then you may also engineer iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be reality-based?
Is it more important for something to be long-term, transparent or to be C2B2B?
Our C2C2B feature set is unmatched, but our integrated architectures and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Flash.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our accounting but our capability to cultivate.
We have proven we know that if you envisioneer dynamically then you may also aggregate interactively.