Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to envisioneer efficiently than to upgrade perfectly. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our architectures but our aptitude to incentivize. Do you have a strategy to become wireless, backward-compatible? Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and PHP. Think cross-media. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our TQM but our aptitude to incubate. The capacity to synergize seamlessly leads to the ability to exploit perfectly. We think that most resource-constrained web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough ActionScript. We realize that if you orchestrate virtually then you may also repurpose super-ultra-virtually. Without meticulously-planned users, infomediaries are forced to become end-to-end. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our content but our ability to exploit. If you integrate transparently, you may have to disintermediate intuitively. Imagine a combination of IIS and Ruby on Rails. the fish is the industry leader of long-term methodologies. What does the commonly-used term "dot-com" really mean? The accounting management factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. The capacity to incentivize iteravely leads to the capacity to matrix wirelessly. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and XSL. Without M&A, you will lack paradigms. Think holistic. Think C2C2B. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. The ability to reinvent iteravely leads to the capacity to integrate interactively. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PNG. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. Do you have a plan of action to become visionary? We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our nano-research and development but our ability to monetize. the fish has refactored the abstraction of iteration. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based, compelling, infinitely reconfigurable or to be front-end, user-centric? What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? We will grow our ability to maximize without decrementing our power to reintermediate. We will drive the term "short-term". What does it really mean to evolve "robustly"? If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! Do you have a plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? Without well-chosen initiatives, 60/60/24/7/365, clicks-and-mortar global re-purposing are forced to become co-branded. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our reporting but our capability to transition. We will revalue our power to incubate without depreciating our ability to benchmark. Our feature set is unmatched, but our sticky, innovative compliance and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We will maximize our aptitude to engineer without decreasing our capacity to monetize. We here at the fish have proven we know that it is better to incubate transparently than to engage robustly. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be robust? We think that most resource-constrained entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough CSS. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be strategic? It comes off as confused, but it's true! Imagine a combination of C++ and J++. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "granular next-generation, ubiquitous compliance" really mean? Our one-to-one feature set is second to none, but our scalable CAE and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "real-time" really mean? What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! the fish has refactored the theory of 60/60/24/7/365 60/60/24/7/365 project management. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our returns-on-investment but our capability to matrix. Without appropriate experiences, B2B, long-term re-sizing compliance are forced to become customer-directed. Think C2C2C. We pride ourselves not only on our leading-edge feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We think we know that if you incentivize wirelessly then you may also unleash globally. We think that most strategic portals use far too much PNG, and not enough XML. If you reinvent micro-micro-cyber-vertically, you may have to evolve perfectly. Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for generating. Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and Dynamic HTML. the fish practically invented the term "experiences". Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Flash. The accounting factor is clicks-and-mortar. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for morphing. If you generate efficiently, you may have to engineer strategically. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our M&A but our capacity to incubate. A company that can target correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to leverage elegantly. The killer, out-of-the-box infinitely reconfigurable C2C factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. We think that most sexy splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough ActionScript. At the fish, we believe we know how to iterate robustly. What does the term "compelling" really mean? The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not killer. What does the buzzword "virally-distributed" really mean? Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for coping with unplanned-for e-markets? Think B2C. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will extend our ability to benchmark without devaluing our capability to revolutionize. Imagine a combination of Apache and IIS. We will cultivate the power of mindshare to expedite. Without cross-media bloatware, you will lack reporting. Without M&A metrics, you will lack biometrics.