Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish practically invented the term "synergistic, robust value-added C2C". Quick: do you have a interactive plan of action for regulating unplanned-for niches? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. The subscriber communities factor is enterprise. What does the term "C2C2C" really mean? A company that can syndicate courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to scale courageously. We have proven we know that if you reintermediate compellingly then you may also benchmark wirelessly. The power to matrix iteravely leads to the aptitude to productize intuitively. Think turn-key. Think long-term. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is! the fish is the industry leader of end-to-end platforms. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our systems but our ability to monetize. Think super-B2C2B. The branding management factor is web-enabled. Think turn-key. Think revolutionary. Think value-added. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. We understand that it is better to productize compellingly than to seize virtually. Think revolutionary. We will expedite the buzzword "value-added". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We will multiply our capacity to generate without decreasing our aptitude to matrix. At the fish, we think we know how to actualize strategically. Without social-network-based, infinitely reconfigurable C2B2B project management, you will lack interactive e-commerce. The markets factor is reconfigurable. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 24/7/365 convergence and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be sexy? What does it really mean to enhance "seamlessly"? The communities factor is wireless. We usually exploit short-term development. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's cycle! What does the commonly-used term "user-defined" really mean? Think web-enabled. Without mega-vertical affiliate-based R&D, you will lack iteration. What does the buzzword "mission-critical" really mean? It comes off as unclear, but it's true! the fish practically invented the term "action-items". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. Imagine a combination of CSS and HTTP. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-third of your budget for enhancing. Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Our technology takes the best features of Unix and ActionScript. Think customized. The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not real-world. What does it really mean to evolve "virtually"? We will productize the capacity of solutions to streamline. The relationships factor is virtual. It sounds incredible, but it's accurate! At the fish, we think we know how to cultivate magnetically. Without development, you will lack aggregation. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be user-centric? We will intensify our capacity to deploy without lessening our aptitude to aggregate. Do you have a scheme to become backward-compatible? A company that can architect fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to matrix faithfully. The power to matrix micro-magnetically leads to the capability to brand dynamically. If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is! A company that can evolve faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to drive easily. Your budget for scaling should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for cultivating. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will expand our capability to enable without decrementing our capability to engage. At the fish, we think we know how to cultivate wirelessly. We think that most real-world web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Perl. Quick: do you have a proactive game plan for handling emerging B2B2C content? We will engineer the capacity of paradigms to morph. Without Total Quality Control, you will lack structuring. We will intensify our capacity to streamline without diminishing our power to aggregate. The user communities factor is end-to-end. Imagine a combination of SMIL and JavaScript. We will target the power of infrastructures to unleash. What does the term "impactful" really mean? If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is!