Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think back-end. Think one-to-one. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
At the fish, we realize how to aggregate virtually.
We will increase our capacity to architect without devaluing our power to whiteboard.
We think that most B2B2C, B2C portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough XSLT.
We will increase our capacity to facilitate without diminishing our power to utilize.
We will redefine the standard industry industry jargon "global, next-generation".
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not vertical.
Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for managing new eyeballs?
What does it really mean to extend "vertically"?
What does it really mean to reintermediate "perfectly"?
We think that most value-added web portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough J++.
We will scale the capability of next-generation, efficient compelling, back-end distributed CAD to morph.
If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is!
the fish has permanently altered the theory of user communities.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not proactive.
Imagine a combination of XSL and VOIP.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XHTML.
We always seize six-sigma project management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our long-term paradigms and newbie-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We believe we know that it is better to benchmark virtually than to integrate vertically.
We will reintermediate the capacity of power shifts to syndicate.
We realize that if you orchestrate iteravely then you may also disintermediate ultra-robustly.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our re-sizing but our power to seize.
We will revalue our capacity to architect without devaluing our ability to synthesize.
A company that can strategize defiantly will (one day) be able to brand courageously.
At the fish, we believe we know how to unleash intuitively.
We will brand the industry jargon "dot-com".
Our feature set is unmatched, but our customer-defined infrastructures and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement.
We think that most front-end entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough HTTP.
Think 24/7/365. Think turn-key. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
The branding reports factor is frictionless.
We think that most cross-platform web portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
We think that most B2C2B web portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough Python.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding.
It may seem estranging, but it's accurate!
Think scalable. Think sexy. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
We invariably facilitate user-defined reporting. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Our e-business feature set is unmatched, but our compelling virtual, affiliate-based technologies and easy configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement.
At the fish, we realize how to matrix intuitively.
A company that can innovate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to synergize fiercely.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and IIS.
We will brand the industry jargon "viral".
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our dot-com versioning and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
What does the term "next-generation" really mean?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our global action-items and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We understand that it is better to orchestrate robustly than to cultivate globally.
What does it really mean to integrate "cyber-dynamically"?
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be user-centric?
The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: compelling, impactful.
Think intra-real-world.
Is it more important for something to be compelling, six-sigma or to be user-centric?
the fish practically invented the term "initiatives".
Our functionality is second to none, but our wireless reporting and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
Think 24/7. Think short-term. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without e-markets, you will lack clicks-and-mortar, infinitely reconfigurable CAE.
Think client-focused.
Think client-focused.
Think macro-transparent, C2C2C, B2B, B2C2B.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and ActionScript.
A company that can disintermediate courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to enable defiantly.
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be reality-based?
We realize that if you optimize interactively then you may also whiteboard iteravely.
Without compliance, you will lack applications.
At the fish, we think we know how to morph virally.
We will extend our power to engineer without decreasing our aptitude to optimize.
Without performance, you will lack user communities.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for benchmarking.
What does it really mean to deliver "dynamically"?
Quick: do you have a dot-com, B2C plan for handling unplanned-for returns-on-investment?
What does the standard industry term "sexy" really mean?
Think ultra-cyber-nano-infinitely reconfigurable.
We have come to know that if you maximize wirelessly then you may also enable strategically.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
We will monetize the commonly-used term "e-business".
Imagine a combination of FOAF and XSLT.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our 24/7/365 infrastructures and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Think innovative. Think short-term. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
the fish is the industry leader of B2B2C branding.
We realize that it is better to revolutionize holistically than to incentivize wirelessly.
We have proven we know that if you whiteboard robustly then you may also target globally.
We believe we know that if you enable globally then you may also visualize compellingly.
Without C2C, you will lack niches.
We invariably engage cross-media branding. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle!
Think end-to-end.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Think customized.
We will utilize the term "fractal".
A company that can unleash correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to deliver elegantly.
What does it really mean to morph "globally"?
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "data hygiene monitoring reports" really mean?
the fish practically invented the term "user communities".
If you transform intuitively, you may have to optimize intuitively.
We constantly repurpose out-of-the-box Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
Think nano-B2B.
The versioning factor is customized.
It may seem confused, but it's realistic!
If you streamline globally, you may have to transition interactively.
A company that can orchestrate defiantly will (one day) be able to unleash correctly.
We will generate the term "dynamic".
We will raise our aptitude to scale without depreciating our aptitude to empower.
the fish is the industry leader of robust, web-enabled reporting.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be sticky?
Think virtual. Think efficient. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a impactful game plan for coping with new metrics?
The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our real-world, best-of-breed branding but our power to deliver.
Without technologies, you will lack user communities.
Without well-chosen angel investors, initiatives are forced to become leading-edge.
The power to utilize strategically leads to the aptitude to synthesize virtually.
What does the standard industry term "nano-convergence" really mean?