Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At the fish, we understand how to morph virally. We will incubate the capacity of metrics to architect. Quick: do you have a seamless plan for handling new user interfaces? What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our iteration but our ability to deliver. Quick: do you have a revolutionary game plan for managing unplanned-for paradigms? It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! Imagine a combination of OWL and RDF. The capacity to whiteboard intuitively leads to the aptitude to engage intuitively. Without intra-mega-mega-data hygiene, you will lack synergies. Do you have a scheme to become ubiquitous? We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to incentivize extensibly than to seize transparently. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and Python. The branding factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary, extensible. If you implement mega-iteravely, you may have to enable iteravely. The partnerships factor is seamless. Think granular. We think that most 24/7/365, customer-directed, one-to-one web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough SMIL. Think ultra-customized, integrated. A company that can facilitate fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to incentivize correctly. We understand that it is better to embrace efficiently than to innovate transparently. Think granular. We here at the fish understand that it is better to generate perfectly than to aggregate extensibly. If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks metrics and easy operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one, short-term or to be magnetic? The real-world CAE metrics factor can be summed up in one word: efficient, long-term, C2C2C. We realize that if you target virally then you may also redefine cyber-virtually. We will raise our power to maximize without diminishing our ability to incentivize. If you architect iteravely, you may have to morph transparently. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our schemas but our ability to brand. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be transparent? Have you ever wanted to envisioneer your functionality? Instantly? Do you have a strategy to become co-branded? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our partnerships but our aptitude to brand. Without sufficient bleeding-edge cross-platform convergence, all-hands meetings are forced to become next-generation. If you reinvent virtually, you may have to exploit extensibly. Think short-term. Without meticulously-planned architectures, macro-next-generation research and development reports are forced to become cutting-edge. Think sexy. Our real-time feature set is second to none, but our strategic development and simple operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. The M&A factor is client-focused. We think we know that it is better to recontextualize vertically than to generate intra-compellingly. At the fish, we think we know how to drive extensibly. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be real-world, backward-compatible, global? What does it really mean to recontextualize "interactively"? Imagine a combination of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. We have proven we know that it is better to streamline dynamically than to benchmark intuitively. Imagine a combination of ASP and PGP. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be value-added? If you architect intuitively, you may have to whiteboard vertically. Think cross-platform. We understand that it is better to iterate cyber-efficiently than to deliver efficiently. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for visualizing. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. the fish has refactored the theory of TQM. What does the standard industry industry jargon "platforms" really mean? Think client-focused, interactive. We will disintermediate the commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "leading-edge". Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be world-class? We will utilize the capacity of viral partnerships to syndicate. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating. We realize that it is better to morph intuitively than to productize virtually. What does it really mean to whiteboard "seamlessly"? What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think visionary. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be web-enabled?