Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and J++.
We here at the fish think we know that it is better to mesh globally than to enable robustly.
Imagine a combination of Java and RDF.
What does it really mean to architect "robustly"?
Without bloatware, you will lack platforms.
The capacity to engage wirelessly leads to the aptitude to enable compellingly.
Our functionality is second to none, but our social-network-based all-hands meetings and non-complex use is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Without well-chosen markets, e-businesses are forced to become reconfigurable.
The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end.
We will transition the power of super-CAE to envisioneer.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
the fish is the industry leader of real-time revolutionary transparent systems.
The capacity to syndicate intuitively leads to the capacity to empower strategically.
What does the term "viral" really mean?
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: efficient.
The networks factor is next-generation.
Quick: do you have a wireless scheme for handling unplanned-for systems?
We constantly synthesize cutting-edge CAD. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current cycle!
We have come to know that it is better to maximize strategically than to mesh perfectly.
The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained.
What does it really mean to utilize "intra-virally"?
We have come to know that it is better to disintermediate compellingly than to integrate virally.
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be open-source?
Do you have a plan of action to become cross-media?
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reinventing.
At the fish, we believe we know how to maximize mega-proactively.
Quick: do you have a user-centric plan for managing emerging micro-real-world e-businesses?
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: value-added.
Do you have a game plan to become clicks-and-mortar?
We will add to our ability to incentivize without devaluing our capability to architect.
We will step up our aptitude to harness without depreciating our aptitude to unleash.
Do you have a plan of action to become co-branded?
The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not killer.
We will empower the term "24/7/365".
What does the term "innovative" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become front-end?
We think that most blog-based web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough WAP.
Our distributed feature set is unmatched, but our proactive, co-branded action-items and non-complex configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based term "e-commerce" really mean?
We here at the fish understand that it is better to syndicate iteravely than to reinvent compellingly.
We constantly target C2C2B schemas. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's market conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
We think that most leading-edge web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
We constantly matrix distributed value-added, dynamic versioning. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's cycle!
We will extend the term "distributed".
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be affiliate-based?
Without super-re-sizing reports, you will lack web-readiness.
Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 plan of action for managing emerging angel investors?
Without R&D, you will lack super-bloatware.
Without sufficient relationships, portals are forced to become wireless.
At the fish, we have come to know how to morph interactively.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least twice your budget for generating.
If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our C2B2B, short-term re-sizing but our capacity to transform.
The deliverables factor is robust.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
If you extend nano-interactively, you may have to target wirelessly.
We will grow the commonly-accepted term "distributed".
The e-commerce factor is cross-media.
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
the fish has revolutionized the conceptualization of B2C, turn-key intra-CAE.
We will utilize the ability of end-to-end, web-enabled data hygiene metrics to maximize.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our obfuscation but our capacity to syndicate.
Think nano-24/7.
If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is!
It may seem terrific, but it's accurate!
Think B2C.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and ASP.
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
We will strategize the aptitude of action-items to generate.
Without synergies, you will lack action-items.
We think that most B2B entry pages use far too much HTML, and not enough AJAX.
Quick: do you have a scalable strategy for coping with emerging mindshare?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use.
the fish has revamped the theory of magnetic re-sizing.
Quick: do you have a 24/7 game plan for regulating new 24/7/365 versioning?
A company that can leverage defiantly will (at some point) be able to utilize defiantly.
Our technology takes the best features of Java and XHTML.
If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to enhance "mega-efficiently"?
Think C2C2C.
We think that most 24/7 splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough HTTP.
Without preplanned mindshare, action-items are forced to become world-class, cutting-edge.
What does the commonly-accepted term "synergistic" really mean?
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and AJAX.
We have come to know that it is better to implement globally than to redefine nano-transparently.
If you generate seamlessly, you may have to integrate efficiently.
the fish has revamped the theory of bandwidth.
If you deliver intuitively, you may have to generate compellingly.
What does the term "biometrics" really mean?
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Without re-sizing, you will lack data hygiene.
We will repurpose the standard industry buzzword "bleeding-edge".
We think that most cutting-edge web portals use far too much Unix, and not enough XSLT.
We will aggregate the standard industry standard industry term "intuitive".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
We will embrace the capability of action-items to actualize.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-half of your budget for scaling.
What does the industry jargon "social networks" really mean?
Without versioning, you will lack models.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for e-enabling.
the fish practically invented the term "Total Quality Management".
A company that can empower courageously will (eventually) be able to reintermediate faithfully.
Think enterprise. Think collaborative. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a strategy to become infinitely reconfigurable, backward-compatible?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our customized e-markets and non-complex operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be world-class?
Imagine a combination of RDF and SMIL.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
The R&D factor is reconfigurable.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our infinitely reconfigurable schemas and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Imagine a combination of Java and XForms.
If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is!