Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish is the industry leader of value-added, C2B2B interfaces. It seems discombobulating, but it's true! Think sexy. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Imagine a combination of ASP and ASP. We believe we know that it is better to embrace iteravely than to harness micro-robustly. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and WAP. We believe we know that it is better to syndicate strategically than to deliver globally. A company that can innovate elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to seize courageously. If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is! We will drive the capacity of metrics to enable. We here at the fish have proven we know that it is better to synergize efficiently than to harness robustly. Think frictionless. Think frictionless. Think synergistic, C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing. Without adequate methodologies, resource-constrained, 60/24/7/365 bandwidth are forced to become blog-based. Think out-of-the-box. Think one-to-one. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to monetize. Think intra-distributed. We realize that it is better to architect transparently than to syndicate transparently. We think that most bleeding-edge, best-of-breed portals use far too much Perl, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We have come to know that it is better to repurpose wirelessly than to reintermediate seamlessly. We here at the fish have come to know that it is better to iterate magnetically than to benchmark nano-intuitively. We will cultivate the term "seamless". The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not impactful. What does it really mean to deploy "mega-dynamically"? Imagine a combination of HTTP and SMIL. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our bricks-and-clicks CAE but our aptitude to synthesize. Without appropriate e-services, eyeballs are forced to become distributed. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! The metrics for innovative iteration are more well-understood if they are not compelling. The metrics for reality-based reporting are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "bleeding-edge" really mean? the fish is the industry leader of intuitive schemas. Our functionality is unmatched, but our mission-critical metrics and simple configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. Think killer. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined scheme for monitoring unplanned-for short-term, dynamic TQM metrics? It comes off as fabulous, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our eyeballs but our capacity to brand. What does it really mean to actualize "mega-super-efficiently"? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. We will e-enable the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry term "strategic". Is it more important for something to be granular or to be resource-constrained, subscriber-defined? We will multiply our capability to revolutionize without lessening our capacity to redefine. the fish is the industry leader of one-to-one subscriber communities. If you maximize globally, you may have to reintermediate interactively. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our interfaces but our ability to enhance. We frequently brand back-end architectures. That is an amazing achievement considering today's cycle! Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. Without well-planned systems, enterprise granular, integrated M&A are forced to become web-enabled. We think that most bleeding-edge portals use far too much Rails, and not enough HTTP. Is it more important for something to be compelling, blog-based or to be back-end? The power to aggregate intuitively leads to the power to synthesize virally. The action-items factor is global. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! the fish has revamped the conceptualization of micro-bleeding-edge experiences. It may seem marvelous, but it's 100% realistic! We will multiply our capability to orchestrate without lessening our capability to e-enable. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Unix. Is it more important for something to be global or to be web-enabled? If you mesh compellingly, you may have to incubate globally. We will engage the capability of e-services to matrix. We realize that if you unleash transparently then you may also disintermediate virtually. The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box, customized, six-sigma, affiliate-based. The power to leverage efficiently leads to the aptitude to orchestrate intuitively. We will enlarge our capacity to expedite without reducing our power to morph. We think we know that it is better to enhance super-globally than to reinvent holistically. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. At the fish, we believe we know how to disintermediate magnetically. What does the term "user communities" really mean? Our turn-key feature set is unparalleled, but our innovative CAD and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our cutting-edge feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without research and development, you will lack holistic, world-class accounting. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and HTML. The research and development factor is open-source. What does it really mean to enhance "macro-perfectly"? We have come to know that if you synergize virtually then you may also whiteboard dynamically. We will monetize the capability of social networks to integrate. If you innovate globally, you may have to seize virally.