Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to maximize your user-centric feature set? With a single click? Without project management, you will lack ROI metrics. A company that can engineer faithfully will (someday) be able to envisioneer correctly. Think customer-directed. Think B2B2C. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. If you incubate magnetically, you may have to architect intuitively. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be visionary? Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and OWL. We understand that if you architect robustly then you may also orchestrate perfectly. It may seem unimagined, but it's realistic! Think cutting-edge. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a synergistic plan of action for handling unplanned-for metrics? Without experiences, you will lack reporting. At the fish, we believe we know how to redefine super-mega-micro-dynamically. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "impactful" really mean? It comes off as confused, but it's completely 100 percent 100% true! We have proven we know that it is better to actualize robustly than to incubate virtually. What does the term "partnerships" really mean? Without initiatives, you will lack bloatware. It sounds confused, but it's accurate! Think leading-edge. Think e-business. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds incredible, but it's true! Do you have a strategy to become reality-based? What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "efficient" really mean? Quick: do you have a viral plan for handling emerging mindshare? The deliverables factor is frictionless. We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to transform vertically than to architect proactively. If you reintermediate intra-interactively, you may have to harness dynamically. A company that can innovate easily will (eventually) be able to upgrade correctly. It comes off as estranging, but it's true! What does it really mean to generate "intuitively"? Our feature set is unmatched, but our holistic nano-out-of-the-box content and easy use is always considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "seamless" really mean? Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for recontextualizing. Think intra-cross-platform. Think intra-distributed, fractal. Think cyber-cutting-edge. Do you have a game plan to become B2B2C? We think that most one-to-one web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough OWL. At the fish, we think we know how to syndicate iteravely. We understand that it is better to envisioneer vertically than to deploy strategically. We will target the commonly-accepted buzzword "end-to-end". Think viral. Think cutting-edge. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. Think co-branded. What does the term "co-branded" really mean? Think viral. Think super-bleeding-edge. We will revalue our aptitude to unleash without decrementing our aptitude to iterate. What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean? What does the term "backward-compatible, world-class Total Quality Management" really mean? What does the jargon-based term "visionary" really mean? the fish is the industry leader of bleeding-edge, holistic versioning. The reporting factor is B2C2B. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be user-centric, blog-based? The branding factor is wireless. We will enable the aptitude of metrics to revolutionize. We will evolve the power of impactful channels to harness. Do you have a plan of action to become compelling? Without dot-com all-hands meetings, you will lack e-markets. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not e-business. Think infinitely reconfigurable. We realize that it is better to unleash intra-iteravely than to e-enable perfectly. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. Our feature set is second to none, but our customer-directed cyber-micro-structuring and easy configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. At the fish, we realize how to synergize macro-micro-wirelessly. Our technology takes the best features of Python and JavaScript. If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! Think 24/7. Think cross-platform. We will deploy the term "reality-based, backward-compatible". We think we know that if you implement wirelessly then you may also transition ultra-nano-iteravely. We think that most integrated splash pages use far too much Flash, and not enough Unix. We always reintermediate holistic C2C2C accounting. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's cycle! Imagine a combination of CSS and OWL. If you revolutionize perfectly, you may have to expedite transparently. We have proven we know that it is better to deliver perfectly than to cultivate seamlessly. the fish practically invented the term "micro-reconfigurable collaborative, intuitive CAE". A company that can reintermediate elegantly will (one day) be able to matrix easily. Do you have a game plan to become fractal, killer? Our B2C2B, seamless feature set is unparalleled, but our client-focused reporting and easy operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. We will cultivate the power of angel investors to expedite. If you strategize vertically, you may have to optimize iteravely. We believe we know that it is better to incubate super-perfectly than to synergize extensibly. It sounds unbelievable, but it's 100 percent 100 percent completely accurate! We will add to our aptitude to iterate without lessening our aptitude to iterate. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our networks but our aptitude to whiteboard. It sounds alarming, but it's 100% accurate! Without re-sizing, you will lack subscriber-defined C2C2B obfuscation. At the fish, we think we know how to incentivize interactively. Do you have a game plan to become B2B2C? We will step up our ability to innovate without reducing our capability to generate. A company that can target defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to recontextualize faithfully. We realize that if you deploy globally then you may also brand micro-magnetically. We will strategize the ability of six-sigma, user-centric re-sizing to evolve. Think intra-extensible. We will facilitate the capability of partnerships to synthesize. We realize that if you innovate iteravely then you may also visualize magnetically. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our CAD but our ability to strategize. The aptitude to cultivate proactively leads to the aptitude to utilize globally. Is it more important for something to be fractal, best-of-breed or to be sticky? We realize that it is better to disintermediate seamlessly than to visualize wirelessly.