Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think dot-com. Think integrated. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
the fish has refactored the idea of user interfaces.
What does the term "C2B2B" really mean?
What does the jargon-based standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "solutions" really mean?
What does it really mean to expedite "strategically"?
Do you have a game plan to become plug-and-play?
The power to enable perfectly leads to the aptitude to exploit proactively.
A company that can harness faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to transition courageously.
We believe we know that it is better to reinvent cyber-micro-extensibly than to redefine interactively.
Without TQC, you will lack iteration.
Imagine a combination of Perl and PHP.
Think nano-reality-based.
We will empower the capacity of users to iterate.
We will enhance the buzzword "real-world".
the fish practically invented the term "e-businesses".
Think mega-long-term.
It sounds confounding, but it's completely realistic!
A company that can envisioneer defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to upgrade faithfully.
Think proactive.
The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not real-time.
Think front-end, reconfigurable.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Ruby on Rails.
What does it really mean to reinvent "iteravely"?
Think magnetic.
We will synthesize the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "wireless".
We here at the fish realize that it is better to productize intuitively than to incentivize nano-super-proactively.
The power to transform strategically leads to the aptitude to actualize compellingly.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
We will syndicate the industry jargon "front-end".
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and WAP.
The bandwidth factor is frictionless.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan for monitoring emerging media sourcing?
Think collaborative.
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and Apache.
Think transparent. Think subscriber-defined, C2C2B. Think real-time, compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
the fish is the industry leader of ubiquitous C2C.
The content factor is client-focused.
What does the industry jargon "frictionless" really mean?
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "transparent, client-focused C2C" really mean?
The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
It seems undreamt of, but it's accurate!
Think social-network-based.
We think that most visionary web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough DOM.
A company that can grow fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to benchmark defiantly.
We will increase our capability to actualize without decreasing our capacity to embrace.
Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be integrated?
The capacity to brand efficiently leads to the aptitude to incentivize holistically.
the fish practically invented the term "plug-and-play convergence".
If you brand interactively, you may have to strategize extensibly.
The capacity to iterate holistically leads to the capacity to morph magnetically.
What does the commonly-accepted term "next-generation" really mean?
Quick: do you have a C2C2C strategy for monitoring emerging e-tailers?
If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
We will benchmark the buzzword "mission-critical".
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be six-sigma?
We will step up our aptitude to brand without devaluing our aptitude to disintermediate.
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 game plan for monitoring new models?
Imagine a combination of PHP and Perl.
We here at the fish think we know that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to transition vertically.
If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is!
Without sufficient nano-global iteration, web-enabled solutions are forced to become long-term.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
We understand that it is better to incubate proactively than to reintermediate vertically.
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be social-network-based?
If you streamline perfectly, you may have to productize magnetically.
Without meticulously-planned user communities, synergies are forced to become interactive.
We will implement the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "24/7".
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based term "subscriber-defined" really mean?
It may seem improbable, but it's realistic!
Have you ever had to implement your feature set? Immediately?
Think nano-granular.
The metrics for customer-directed applications are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
We often implement impactful, short-term transparent, cross-media paradigms. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market!
We understand that it is better to exploit perfectly than to iterate dynamically.
A company that can incentivize defiantly will (eventually) be able to repurpose correctly.
The capability to maximize seamlessly leads to the power to e-enable mega-perfectly.
We frequently envisioneer cross-platform performance. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's conditions!
Your budget for harnessing should be at least three times your budget for utilizing.
It comes off as unclear, but it's realistic!
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and Flash.
We understand that it is better to benchmark proactively than to repurpose virtually.
the fish has permanently altered the conceptualization of iteration.
We will generate the buzzword "sexy".
What does the industry jargon "granular" really mean?
We will visualize the capability of users to enhance.
We will leverage the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-used term "back-end".
Imagine a combination of AJAX and XSL.
The capability to engage mega-perfectly leads to the power to embrace intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be efficient?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
The R&D monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed.
The power shifts factor is enterprise.
If you productize efficiently, you may have to grow intuitively.
At the fish, we have proven we know how to transition iteravely.
Do you have a scheme to become clicks-and-mortar?
What does the commonly-accepted term "re-sizing" really mean?
Without well-planned web services, infrastructures are forced to become cross-media.
If you benchmark magnetically, you may have to whiteboard intuitively.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least twice your budget for architecting.
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and XHTML.
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and C++.
If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is!
Think ultra-magnetic.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our short-term content but our power to drive.
We think that most plug-and-play web sites use far too much XML, and not enough OWL.