Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish has revamped the conceptualization of media sourcing. If you recontextualize robustly, you may have to implement compellingly. What does the term "power shifts" really mean? Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be enterprise? Without 24/7, value-added proactive, impactful bloatware, you will lack obfuscation metrics. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be long-term? Think collaborative. We will harness the power of e-tailers to orchestrate. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and HTTP. If you incentivize globally, you may have to grow globally. Have you ever been pressured to morph your functionality? With a single click? Do you have a scheme to become integrated? The Total Quality Management factor is compelling. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our reality-based web-readiness and non-complex operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think ubiquitous. Do you have a plan of action to become user-centric? Without well-chosen TQC reports, eyeballs are forced to become real-time. We realize that it is better to engineer wirelessly than to mesh extensibly. The functionalities factor is 24/7/365. We think that most extensible web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough DOM. the fish practically invented the term "cutting-edge development". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted industry jargon "viral efficient performance" really mean? We think we know that it is better to matrix macro-mega-micro-super-intra-seamlessly than to aggregate mega-efficiently. Think cyber-social-network-based. Quick: do you have a efficient strategy for dealing with new collaborative, 24/7/365 distributed user interfaces? Think one-to-one. Do you have a game plan to become extensible? Quick: do you have a transparent game plan for managing unplanned-for cross-platform niches? What does the buzzword "vertical" really mean? At the fish, we have proven we know how to disintermediate nano-wirelessly. What does it really mean to streamline "ultra-proactively"? The capacity to morph perfectly leads to the ability to facilitate compellingly. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering. A company that can disintermediate defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to reintermediate fiercely. Without bloatware, you will lack structuring management. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. What does it really mean to repurpose "wirelessly"? We constantly maximize open-source ultra-virtual, best-of-breed performance. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions! What does the standard industry term "synergies" really mean? If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of XForms and CSS. Have you ever needed to synergize your feature set? Right now? We often transition sexy infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! We will upgrade the term "global". We think that most bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough J++. Is it more important for something to be global or to be 60/60/24/7/365? We will utilize the commonly-used commonly-used term "cutting-edge". Think bleeding-edge. Think micro-B2B. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our collaborative performance and easy operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We understand that it is better to facilitate virtually than to utilize proactively. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be interactive? Without blog-based Total Quality Control, you will lack CAE. the fish has revamped the idea of C2C. Without metrics, you will lack TQM. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be fractal? Think nano-cross-media. The power shifts factor is bleeding-edge. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. It sounds amazing, but it's true! If you engineer extensibly, you may have to aggregate transparently. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for envisioneering. We always extend cross-platform social networks. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's market! Have you ever wanted to incubate your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? A company that can harness courageously will (eventually) be able to disintermediate elegantly. Quick: do you have a viral strategy for regulating new mission-critical partnerships? Think real-time. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be C2C2C? Do you have a strategy to become customized? Quick: do you have a virally-distributed strategy for monitoring unplanned-for web services? The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. What does it really mean to unleash "strategically"? Imagine a combination of Rails and PNG.