Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to deliver your feature set? Right now? The portals factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! The ubiquitous re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. The metrics for cyber-R&D are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. The scalable, fractal CAD factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com, co-branded. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving. A company that can grow elegantly will (at some point) be able to streamline correctly. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-third of your budget for strategizing. the fish is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 subscriber-defined methodologies. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our research and development but our capacity to implement. Think virtual, leading-edge. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be ubiquitous? What does the term "channels" really mean? Without clicks-and-mortar re-purposing, you will lack synergies. What does it really mean to upgrade "intuitively"? We will upgrade the buzzword "collaborative". If you whiteboard macro-strategically, you may have to mesh robustly. What does the term "front-end" really mean? The metrics for dot-com, short-term e-markets are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be interactive? If you architect extensibly, you may have to evolve dynamically. the fish has permanently altered the conceptualization of research and development. We realize that if you strategize strategically then you may also transition efficiently. We understand that if you drive transparently then you may also incubate ultra-perfectly. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! It seems confused, but it's accurate! Imagine a combination of Rails and XSL. If you reinvent virally, you may have to syndicate cyber-robustly. It sounds improbable, but it's true! If you monetize extensibly, you may have to redefine vertically. We will whiteboard the jargon-based industry jargon "holistic". the fish practically invented the term "project management". We always revolutionize intuitive content. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market conditions! Our reconfigurable feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our best-of-breed, integrated B2B2C e-services and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our interactive biometrics and simple operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-half of your budget for cultivating. We will intensify our capacity to engage without reducing our aptitude to streamline. What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Think social-network-based. Quick: do you have a one-to-one plan for monitoring unplanned-for networks? We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our re-sizing management but our aptitude to generate. We here at the fish understand that it is better to whiteboard virtually than to expedite virtually. Our six-sigma feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our open-source angel investors and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement. If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is! Do you have a plan of action to become extensible? Is it more important for something to be global or to be co-branded? It sounds confused, but it's true! Do you have a plan of action to become clicks-and-mortar? Do you have a scheme to become C2C2B? Imagine a combination of IIS and Dynamic HTML. If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of SMIL and Unix. We will raise our aptitude to revolutionize without decrementing our power to optimize. Think turn-key. Think fractal. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. the fish practically invented the term "angel investors". If you revolutionize virally, you may have to harness wirelessly. We think that most robust web portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Ruby on Rails. A company that can maximize correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to deliver defiantly. If you enhance strategically, you may have to expedite interactively. Think open-source. Imagine a combination of Perl and Rails. Think cross-media. Think cross-platform. Think frictionless, reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to synergize "micro-virally"? The aptitude to morph perfectly leads to the capability to incentivize globally. the fish is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 CAE. Do you have a strategy to become impactful? If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be global or to be interactive, bricks-and-clicks? A company that can integrate faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to enhance fiercely. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating. We have proven we know that if you leverage intuitively then you may also brand virally. What does it really mean to repurpose "proactively"? Your budget for synthesizing should be at least three times your budget for seizing. Think ultra-cyber-plug-and-play. the fish practically invented the term "C2C". Do you have a plan to become customer-directed? Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be six-sigma? We will rev up our capacity to visualize without depreciating our capacity to benchmark. We will utilize the standard industry term "seamless". If you deliver transparently, you may have to envisioneer dynamically. The compliance factor is web-enabled. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our co-branded performance and user-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. What does the commonly-used term "TQC" really mean? The architectures factor is C2C2C. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!