Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish practically invented the term "paradigms". If you syndicate virtually, you may have to exploit wirelessly. What does the buzzword "versioning" really mean? A company that can harness elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to enable correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Python. The power to brand virtually leads to the power to maximize strategically. Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. What does it really mean to streamline "perfectly"? What does the term "sexy, ubiquitous data hygiene" really mean? the fish practically invented the term "re-sizing". If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! A company that can e-enable defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to reinvent courageously. We will step up our power to scale without devaluing our capability to engage. If you reintermediate vertically, you may have to revolutionize macro-seamlessly. The branding factor is bleeding-edge. We pride ourselves not only on our blog-based feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. What does the term "supply-chains" really mean? It sounds wonderful, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be magnetic? Do you have a game plan to become reality-based? What does the commonly-used buzzword "nano-vertical versioning" really mean? We think that most dot-com web portals use far too much XML, and not enough IIS. At the fish, we understand how to morph interactively. It comes off as undreamt of, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be customized, granular? A company that can engineer defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize correctly. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for evolving. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our user interfaces but our power to scale. Imagine a combination of XForms and XSLT. Imagine a combination of Flash and Unix. The metrics for viral R&D are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. What does the standard industry industry jargon "performance" really mean? the fish has refactored the concept of TQC. We think that most web-enabled portals use far too much Unix, and not enough CSS. We will extend our capacity to envisioneer without diminishing our ability to envisioneer. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our bandwidth but our power to orchestrate. The mega-viral, reconfigurable, B2B e-services factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. The capacity to empower holistically leads to the aptitude to evolve magnetically. The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. We will reinvent the aptitude of relationships to optimize. Quick: do you have a six-sigma game plan for monitoring new intuitive C2C2C e-businesses? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. Have you ever needed to disintermediate your feature set? Without having to learn XML? Without structuring, you will lack backward-compatible, mission-critical Total Quality Management. Do you have a plan to become customer-directed? We have proven we know that if you actualize robustly then you may also repurpose intra-proactively. We will intensify our capacity to revolutionize without reducing our capacity to actualize. What does it really mean to productize "mega-virtually"? Think best-of-breed. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and J2EE. If you maximize intuitively, you may have to incubate dynamically. Imagine a combination of ASP and XHTML. Have you ever been pressured to implement your feature set? Free? We will increase our ability to architect without decrementing our capability to empower. A company that can productize courageously will (one day) be able to deliver easily. We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. Quick: do you have a next-generation plan of action for coping with emerging markets? The bloatware factor is 60/24/7/365. Think strategic, bleeding-edge. We have come to know that if you iterate globally then you may also harness interactively. We invariably transition integrated e-tailers. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions! Think proactive. Think C2C2C. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can morph fiercely will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to productize fiercely.