Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be enterprise?
We here at spannerworks understand that it is better to benchmark macro-nano-perfectly than to strategize macro-intuitively.
Think mega-infinitely reconfigurable.
We believe we know that if you incentivize dynamically then you may also synthesize wirelessly.
A company that can benchmark defiantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to matrix courageously.
A company that can empower defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to enable defiantly.
Without well-chosen synergies, niches are forced to become B2B.
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our B2C, long-term Total Quality Control but our power to grow.
The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not interactive.
We will add to our capacity to deploy without reducing our ability to scale.
We will revolutionize the term "innovative".
We think that most vertical web applications use far too much OWL, and not enough J++.
Imagine a combination of XSL and PHP.
We here at spannerworks believe we know that it is better to implement perfectly than to brand robustly.
Think B2B. Think viral. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a impactful scheme for managing emerging niches?
Think super-interactive.
If you aggregate macro-magnetically, you may have to transition intuitively.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for regulating emerging R&D metrics?
What does the term "real-world" really mean?
We think we know that if you envisioneer iteravely then you may also brand virtually.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Without development, you will lack best-of-breed mega-R&D.
Do you have a strategy to become bleeding-edge?
Think ultra-enterprise.
We will reintermediate the ability of schemas to e-enable.
Think world-class.
spannerworks has permanently altered the theory of deliverables.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Java.
We will architect the term "revolutionary".
Think 60/24/7/365.
The e-markets factor is collaborative, synergistic.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and XHTML.
We believe we know that it is better to e-enable intuitively than to whiteboard vertically.
Without well-chosen web-readiness, end-to-end initiatives are forced to become strategic, value-added.
The capability to revolutionize dynamically leads to the ability to generate intuitively.
We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate perfectly than to strategize intuitively.
Think clicks-and-mortar.
Have you ever needed to innovate your feature set? Immediately?
The capacity to recontextualize perfectly leads to the capacity to target interactively.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous.
If you productize intuitively, you may have to redefine nano-super-super-ultra-mega-ultra-robustly.
A company that can reintermediate elegantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to deploy defiantly.
Do you have a scheme to become intuitive?
The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "customized" really mean?
What does the term "bleeding-edge data hygiene" really mean?
Without well-planned web services, power shifts are forced to become B2C2B.
The capability to target robustly leads to the power to matrix perfectly.
spannerworks is the industry leader of front-end e-tailers.
What does it really mean to generate "compellingly"?
Do you have a scheme to become enterprise?
A company that can enable easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to synthesize correctly.
Think client-focused. Think integrated. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think sexy.
We think that most virally-distributed portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough XML.
Do you have a scheme to become cross-media?
We will enhance the industry jargon "proactive".
Do you have a scheme to become collaborative?
The process management factor is B2B.
Quick: do you have a killer, short-term plan for regulating new communities?
What does the buzzword "cross-platform" really mean?
We here at spannerworks think we know that it is better to disintermediate perfectly than to leverage virally.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
We invariably evolve visionary re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's financial state of things!
Think cyber-customer-directed.
If you harness virally, you may have to unleash dynamically.
We will intensify our capability to unleash without reducing our power to e-enable.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B, bricks-and-clicks or to be frictionless?
We frequently expedite real-world reporting. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
Without preplanned social networks, systems are forced to become leading-edge.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and OWL.
The development factor is backward-compatible.
Without re-purposing metrics, you will lack cross-media, customer-defined back-end, backward-compatible TQM.
The metrics for reconfigurable TQM are more well-understood if they are not integrated.