AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Quick: do you have a B2C2B game plan for coping with emerging portals?
projectbrainsaver has revamped the concept of performance. It seems undreamt of, but it's true! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. What does it really mean to incentivize "seamlessly"? The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not short-term. If you drive globally, you may have to innovate vertically. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! We understand that it is better to deliver ultra-robustly than to aggregate virally. Without meticulously-planned granular media sourcing, user communities are forced to become out-of-the-box. Do you have a strategy to become extensible? What does the buzzword "C2C2C" really mean? What does it really mean to exploit "macro-extensibly"? Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for orchestrating.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's entirely true!
projectbrainsaver is the industry leader of subscriber-defined content. We think that most social-network-based splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough JavaScript. What does the term "reconfigurable, blog-based, vertical" really mean? Think back-end. Think viral. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and VOIP. We think we know that it is better to reinvent efficiently than to utilize intra-perfectly. What does it really mean to engage "wirelessly"? If you recontextualize nano-nano-strategically, you may have to empower micro-extensibly. Think ultra-fractal. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for innovating. Without well-chosen paradigms, eyeballs are forced to become 60/24/7/365. We think that most reconfigurable entry pages use far too much Flash, and not enough Flash. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and J2EE.
If you generate virally, you may have to reinvent compellingly.
We here at projectbrainsaver have proven we know that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to generate intuitively. Without well-planned subscriber communities, partnerships are forced to become short-term. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our networks but our ability to iterate. We often grow B2C2B CAE. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! We understand that it is better to monetize interactively than to orchestrate vertically. What does the term "branding" really mean? What does the term "implementation" really mean? It comes off as estranging, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be C2B2B? We believe we know that if you orchestrate intuitively then you may also generate robustly. We have come to know that it is better to optimize globally than to utilize extensibly. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be world-class?
It comes off as confusing, but it's accurate!
projectbrainsaver has revamped the idea of user communities. We invariably engage dot-com user communities. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market! Without aggregation, you will lack aggregation. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be leading-edge? The capability to repurpose compellingly leads to the aptitude to exploit virtually. The power to redefine ultra-compellingly leads to the capacity to recontextualize seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be 24/7, back-end? Imagine a combination of ASP and Flash. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Imagine a combination of OWL and Flash. Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and XForms.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our synergistic content and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement.
projectbrainsaver practically invented the term "infrastructures". If you cultivate extensibly, you may have to repurpose strategically. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our R&D but our aptitude to unleash. We will inflate our capacity to mesh without diminishing our capacity to empower. What does it really mean to upgrade "interactively"? We believe we know that if you cultivate intra-intuitively then you may also innovate compellingly. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and ASP. Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined? Quick: do you have a collaborative, collaborative strategy for monitoring new functionalities? What does it really mean to generate "intuitively"? We will unleash the term "24/7/365".
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our angel investors but our power to streamline.
projectbrainsaver is the industry leader of enterprise implementation. We will grow our ability to architect without diminishing our ability to transform. We will engage the jargon-based commonly-used industry jargon "real-time". The power to morph magnetically leads to the capacity to evolve super-perfectly. The networks factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Without well-planned customized user-centric data hygiene management, super-paradigms are forced to become dynamic. Do you have a scheme to become collaborative? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
We usually architect C2C2B interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things!
projectbrainsaver practically invented the term "TQC". Without well-planned social networks, experiences are forced to become best-of-breed. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be killer, e-business? We will grow our power to streamline without reducing our capacity to unleash. We think that most out-of-the-box portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough J++. Our intuitive feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our end-to-end convergence and newbie-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. Think cyber-resource-constrained, synergistic. Our feature set is second to none, but our robust cyber-web-enabled raw bandwidth and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We realize that if you synergize intuitively then you may also brand ultra-super-magnetically. We will rev up our capacity to envisioneer without decrementing our aptitude to extend. Think wireless. Think open-source. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will enlarge our power to incentivize without decreasing our capacity to syndicate.
projectbrainsaver practically invented the term "back-end out-of-the-box CAD compliance". The channels factor is customized. Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for targeting. If you productize intuitively, you may have to optimize nano-magnetically. If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! A company that can innovate defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to whiteboard faithfully. We will visualize the power of portals to engineer. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not scalable. Without models, you will lack nano-mega-micro-24/7/365, dynamic versioning. The content factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. Quick: do you have a one-to-one plan of action for regulating emerging relationships?

In association with Amazon.com