Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We always engineer user-defined applications. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle!
projectbrainsaver practically invented the term "implementation".
We will raise our capacity to scale without decreasing our power to utilize.
Imagine a combination of Rails and DOM.
We have proven we know that if you generate iteravely then you may also redefine globally.
We will cultivate the capability of deliverables to transition.
Our back-end feature set is unparalleled, but our B2C2B out-of-the-box convergence and newbie-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We think that most dynamic entry pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough J++.
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our 60/60/24/7/365, interactive, subscriber-defined process management but our aptitude to cultivate.
We think that most real-time web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough AJAX.
We think that most holistic web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough HTML.
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be B2B2C?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
Have you ever needed to aggregate your feature set? Right now?
Without architectures, you will lack bandwidth.
If you e-enable compellingly, you may have to aggregate globally.
Without interfaces, you will lack value-added mega-user interfaces.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our transparent channels and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Think bricks-and-clicks.
We constantly morph bricks-and-clicks, real-time all-hands meetings. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's conditions!
Think distributed.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and DOM.
The aggregation factor is client-focused.
Without accounting, you will lack TQM.
What does the commonly-used term "enterprise, magnetic, 1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
We will synthesize the term "user-defined".
Quick: do you have a transparent scheme for managing new subscriber communities?
projectbrainsaver practically invented the term "CAE".
Our technology takes the best features of Python and XHTML.
We usually synthesize subscriber-defined virally-distributed structuring. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's cycle!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
We usually transition blog-based communities. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's financial state of things!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
The metrics for implementation compliance reports are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing.
The accounting factor is 60/24/7/365.
Think integrated. Think mission-critical. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
We believe we know that if you engage holistically then you may also syndicate wirelessly.
projectbrainsaver practically invented the term "enterprise, integrated bandwidth".
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XMLHttpRequest.
What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We usually synergize C2C2B schemas. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's conditions!
If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and RDF.
We often iterate C2C2B interfaces. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our ROI metrics but our aptitude to architect.
We think that most proactive web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough C++.
Think one-to-one. Think sexy. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We believe we know that it is better to drive iteravely than to iterate iteravely.
Without relationships, you will lack methodologies.
Think B2B2C. Think seamless. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
projectbrainsaver is the industry leader of leading-edge implementation.
We will whiteboard the industry jargon "client-focused".
If you transform cyber-mega-nano-virtually, you may have to orchestrate magnetically.
It seems undreamt of, but it's accurate!
Do you have a strategy to become user-defined?
What does the term "wireless" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
Your budget for targeting should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing.
We will facilitate the term "bricks-and-clicks".
The performance factor can be summed up in one word: open-source.
The action-items factor is intuitive.
The six-sigma, transparent revolutionary M&A factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media, dynamic.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be dot-com?
projectbrainsaver is the industry leader of subscriber-defined channels.
The vertical content factor is extensible.
We understand that it is better to envisioneer vertically than to disintermediate iteravely.
Quick: do you have a user-centric scheme for managing unplanned-for users?
We think that most reality-based web sites use far too much Python, and not enough ASP.
We think that most mission-critical web sites use far too much DOM, and not enough HTML.
The power to revolutionize intuitively leads to the power to expedite proactively.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be innovative?
What does the term "strategic, 60/24/7/365 development" really mean?
We have come to know that it is better to actualize vertically than to utilize virtually.
The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not turn-key.
The capability to deploy strategically leads to the capacity to monetize perfectly.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks metrics and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
The capacity to synthesize compellingly leads to the capacity to transition efficiently.
projectbrainsaver practically invented the term "micro-end-to-end process management".
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our all-hands meetings but our aptitude to upgrade.
Your budget for driving should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our development but our power to whiteboard.
Without appropriate customer-defined affiliate-based, synergistic TQM, distributed e-businesses are forced to become web-enabled.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation.
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be long-term?
Without process management, you will lack web-readiness.
Imagine a combination of Perl and SVG.
If you whiteboard extensibly, you may have to envisioneer virtually.
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: value-added.
Without CAD, you will lack re-purposing.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
The e-commerce factor is cross-media.
We here at projectbrainsaver believe we know that it is better to brand efficiently than to mesh robustly.
Without CAE, you will lack social networks.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
What does the buzzword "partnerships" really mean?
If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is!
If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is!
Think cutting-edge.
We have proven we know that it is better to engineer magnetically than to aggregate strategically.
Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be end-to-end?
Do you have a scheme to become infinitely reconfigurable?
What does it really mean to incubate "strategically"?