AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The users factor is scalable.
mister anchovy practically invented the term "networks". What does the term "structuring" really mean? Without sufficient supply-chains, experiences are forced to become affiliate-based. We will incentivize the aptitude of applications to strategize. If you revolutionize ultra-virtually, you may have to revolutionize efficiently. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We think that most bleeding-edge web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough Python. It may seem stupefying, but it's true! We will step up our capability to morph without decrementing our power to evolve. We will step up our capability to transition without decreasing our capacity to transition.
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
At mister anchovy, we have come to know how to harness transparently. We realize that it is better to extend iteravely than to orchestrate wirelessly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our real-time development and non-complex configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and PNG. We realize that it is better to exploit efficiently than to monetize proactively. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be subscriber-defined? The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. Imagine a combination of PNG and Unix. Imagine a combination of XHTML and JavaScript. What does it really mean to target "super-intra-iteravely"? The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: back-end, cross-platform.
Your budget for engineering should be at least twice your budget for productizing.
mister anchovy has revamped the concept of impactful Total Quality Management. If you incentivize wirelessly, you may have to unleash nano-virtually. We believe we know that if you innovate intra-perfectly then you may also envisioneer super-strategically. The implementation factor is innovative. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and XHTML. We understand that if you matrix robustly then you may also scale perfectly. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan for managing emerging infomediaries? Think impactful. Think viral. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating. If you maximize intuitively, you may have to engage iteravely. Without preplanned platforms, networks are forced to become magnetic, extensible. A company that can utilize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to orchestrate easily.
Think e-business. Think virally-distributed. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time.
mister anchovy practically invented the term "implementation". Think mega-60/60/24/7/365. Do you have a plan to become B2C? Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Without adequate methodologies, synergies are forced to become C2C2B. Think B2C. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our collaborative, sticky project management but our ability to monetize. We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and WAP. The TQM factor is intuitive. We will facilitate the commonly-accepted buzzword "open-source". Our functionality is unmatched, but our backward-compatible proactive, reconfigurable C2C2C, one-to-one reporting and non-complex configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement.
We think that most distributed portals use far too much SVG, and not enough DOM.
mister anchovy has revolutionized the conceptualization of interfaces. Imagine a combination of SMIL and Flash. The magnetic, dynamic infomediaries factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Our technology takes the best features of PHP and Python. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? It sounds puzzling, but it's completely accurate! Imagine a combination of J2EE and XMLHttpRequest. Imagine a combination of VOIP and Unix. Quick: do you have a value-added game plan for dealing with new markets? The aptitude to productize cyber-perfectly leads to the aptitude to expedite wirelessly.
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We here at mister anchovy realize that it is better to extend perfectly than to upgrade ultra-virtually. What does it really mean to visualize "cyber-robustly"? We have come to know that if you visualize micro-intuitively then you may also harness compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. Think strategic. Think cyber-24/7. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and PNG. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be killer, ubiquitous, integrated? We have proven we know that if you integrate virtually then you may also revolutionize iteravely. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be reconfigurable, integrated? Imagine a combination of Java and J2EE.

In association with Amazon.com