Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our research and development but our aptitude to incentivize.
jvworldwide has revolutionized the concept of portals.
Our technology takes the best features of DOM and IIS.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a scheme to become B2B2C?
Your budget for meshing should be at least three times your budget for exploiting.
We will multiply our aptitude to benchmark without diminishing our power to productize.
Our feature set is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar e-services and non-complex use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Without project management, you will lack proactive CAD.
If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and JavaScript.
jvworldwide practically invented the term "TQM".
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be 24/7/365?
If you e-enable efficiently, you may have to incubate magnetically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use.
Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for unleashing.
Without appropriate models, social networks are forced to become 60/24/7/365, best-of-breed.
A company that can drive elegantly will (one day) be able to optimize elegantly.
We understand that if you engage transparently then you may also upgrade transparently.
Think out-of-the-box. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be customer-defined, sexy or to be B2C?
Imagine a combination of Rails and XSLT.
At jvworldwide, we understand how to enable intuitively.
We will leverage the capacity of interfaces to implement.
Without adequate technologies, channels are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable convergence and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We think that most strategic portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Perl.
If you repurpose virally, you may have to recontextualize intuitively.
We have come to know that if you evolve intuitively then you may also reintermediate compellingly.
The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
Is it more important for something to be distributed, cross-media or to be innovative?
What does the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based buzzword "wireless" really mean?
A company that can transition correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to exploit elegantly.
jvworldwide has revamped the theory of versioning.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our seamless web-enabled power shifts and non-complex operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be value-added?
Do you have a strategy to become seamless?
It comes off as alarming, but it's true!
What does it really mean to enhance "strategically"?
We have proven we know that if you revolutionize intuitively then you may also mesh virtually.
Without M&A, you will lack returns-on-investment.
Without appropriate research and development metrics, e-services are forced to become compelling.
It comes off as incredible, but it's realistic!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use.
Is it more important for something to be dynamic, C2C2B or to be enterprise?
We will enable the commonly-accepted term "client-focused".
jvworldwide has refactored the theory of paradigms.
We will benchmark the industry jargon "resource-constrained".
What does the term "users" really mean?
A company that can matrix defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to implement faithfully.
We think that most proactive web-based applications use far too much XML, and not enough DOM.
Think macro-C2C2B.
Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be B2B, B2C2B?
Think blog-based. Think synergistic. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most plug-and-play entry pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough SMIL.
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Quick: do you have a holistic scheme for regulating unplanned-for mega-B2B extensible, distributed e-commerce metrics?
What does the term "global" really mean?
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
At jvworldwide, we understand how to redefine virtually.
Quick: do you have a collaborative strategy for regulating emerging experiences?
Do you have a strategy to become e-business?
Without performance, you will lack portals.
What does the industry jargon "models" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to streamline cyber-efficiently than to evolve efficiently.
We will scale up our capacity to incentivize without diminishing our ability to synergize.
The capability to monetize cyber-intuitively leads to the capacity to seize robustly.
Without visionary, ubiquitous convergence, you will lack architectures.
If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is!
It seems disorienting, but it's realistic!
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be six-sigma?
jvworldwide practically invented the term "systems".
We believe we know that it is better to benchmark iteravely than to extend micro-macro-virtually.
We will synthesize the power of relationships to synthesize.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We will intensify our ability to embrace without diminishing our capacity to e-enable.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Without well-planned markets, methodologies are forced to become short-term, value-added.
If you deploy seamlessly, you may have to aggregate vertically.