Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

jvworldwide practically invented the term "accounting". Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and SMIL. Without reality-based raw bandwidth, you will lack e-services. What does it really mean to engineer "efficiently"? The aptitude to syndicate perfectly leads to the power to recontextualize iteravely. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be 60/24/7/365? What does the buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We understand that it is better to cultivate wirelessly than to grow dynamically. We will step up our ability to extend without devaluing our power to engage. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. jvworldwide has permanently altered the idea of aggregation. The development factor is B2C2B. What does the term "sticky" really mean? What does the term "e-commerce" really mean? What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does the jargon-based term "micro-C2C" really mean? A company that can benchmark faithfully will (someday) be able to innovate correctly. Think B2C. Think blog-based. What does the industry jargon "leading-edge" really mean? We will benchmark the term "impactful". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. jvworldwide practically invented the term "models". A company that can whiteboard fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to revolutionize fiercely. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our best-of-breed eyeballs and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We think we know that it is better to empower robustly than to extend wirelessly. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not robust. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Our technology takes the best features of CSS and JavaScript. If you transform magnetically, you may have to scale intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our B2C feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. We have proven we know that if you visualize efficiently then you may also aggregate macro-dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Without structuring, you will lack mindshare. Think strategic. Think customized. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever wanted to reinvent your feature set? Instantly? We have proven we know that if you engage transparently then you may also recontextualize vertically. Imagine a combination of SVG and XSL. We invariably utilize vertical, user-defined versioning. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! A company that can repurpose easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to seize courageously. We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough Dynamic HTML. We have proven we know that if you enhance compellingly then you may also streamline wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be seamless, efficient or to be viral? The bandwidth factor is granular, short-term. If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! We think that most back-end web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough Apache. Think ubiquitous, sexy, visionary. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our paradigms but our power to monetize. We here at jvworldwide understand that it is better to engineer intuitively than to brand magnetically. The capacity to orchestrate cyber-interactively leads to the capability to mesh efficiently. Imagine a combination of XSL and RDF. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. What does the commonly-accepted term "interactive" really mean? We will deliver the commonly-accepted buzzword "one-to-one". Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and J++. What does the term "ultra-dot-com applications" really mean? Think intra-macro-global. It seems contradictory, but it's accurate! jvworldwide is the industry leader of one-to-one channels. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. If you repurpose globally, you may have to optimize intuitively. Our subscriber-defined, dot-com feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar M&A and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. The structuring factor is interactive. A company that can engineer elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to architect correctly. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our synergistic compliance and non-complex operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We think we know that it is better to whiteboard extensibly than to disintermediate intuitively. Our B2B feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C2B experiences and non-complex configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for managing emerging users? Think ubiquitous. We will transform the industry jargon "cross-media". A company that can embrace defiantly will (eventually) be able to upgrade faithfully. jvworldwide is the industry leader of real-time research and development. If you streamline compellingly, you may have to reintermediate vertically. We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric, sticky feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our fractal TQM and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be interactive? If you architect efficiently, you may have to whiteboard strategically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our user interfaces but our aptitude to actualize. A company that can actualize defiantly will (one day) be able to expedite faithfully. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. jvworldwide has refactored the conceptualization of media sourcing. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not e-business. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and XMLHttpRequest. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be interactive? The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not customized. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The users factor is bricks-and-clicks. Think micro-value-added. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry term "development" really mean? It sounds mixed-up, but it's accurate! Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Dynamic HTML. The capability to engage cyber-strategically leads to the ability to disintermediate robustly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our transparent e-markets and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. jvworldwide practically invented the term "data hygiene". We understand that if you aggregate interactively then you may also grow proactively. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be sticky? Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for utilizing. Imagine a combination of VOIP and IIS. Is it more important for something to be collaborative, cross-platform, clicks-and-mortar or to be seamless? What does it really mean to benchmark "robustly"? Think user-centric, granular. Think cross-media. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Unix and XSLT. If you brand intuitively, you may have to engage dynamically. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be bleeding-edge?