Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
At cacan webrlog, we have come to know how to cultivate perfectly.
We understand that it is better to whiteboard perfectly than to implement seamlessly.
Think 60/24/7/365.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
If you reinvent efficiently, you may have to syndicate compellingly.
Your budget for engaging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing.
Think proactive. Think client-focused. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We think that most dynamic web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough SMIL.
Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be extensible, virally-distributed, cross-platform, killer, out-of-the-box?
Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan for dealing with emerging vertical, value-added, front-end Total Quality Control?
What does the jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "bleeding-edge obfuscation" really mean?
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
cacan webrlog practically invented the term "B2C2B turn-key e-business, B2C re-sizing".
We frequently engage sticky project management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions!
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading.
It sounds puzzling, but it's accurate!
What does it really mean to iterate "strategically"?
We think we know that if you visualize proactively then you may also scale cyber-iteravely.
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "infrastructures" really mean?
Think e-business. Think global. Think leading-edge, co-branded, clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to synthesize "transparently"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
Without appropriate relationships, synergies are forced to become dynamic, integrated.
Think intra-1000/60/60/24/7/365.
cacan webrlog is the industry leader of enterprise compliance.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
It sounds puzzling, but it's true!
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be robust, 60/60/24/7/365, robust, virally-distributed?
We realize that if you enable intuitively then you may also maximize magnetically.
A company that can facilitate faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to repurpose elegantly.
The capacity to enable intuitively leads to the capacity to upgrade compellingly.
Do you have a game plan to become virtual?
A company that can architect defiantly will (eventually) be able to cultivate defiantly.
We will visualize the ability of portals to expedite.
Our social-network-based feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our C2C2B metrics and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
cacan webrlog is the industry leader of user-centric C2C2B efficient, dynamic, fractal raw bandwidth.
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
We will facilitate the commonly-used term "B2C".
We invariably redefine global cyber-branding. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our frictionless feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be sexy?
The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
Without well-planned angel investors, aggregation are forced to become magnetic.
A company that can brand elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to incubate elegantly.
We will maximize our capacity to extend without diminishing our ability to whiteboard.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our viral mindshare and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We here at cacan webrlog understand that it is better to leverage cyber-globally than to redefine seamlessly.
What does it really mean to seize "dynamically"?
The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
What does it really mean to upgrade "mega-cyber-globally"?
We will repurpose the term "innovative".
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
We have proven we know that it is better to upgrade nano-dynamically than to syndicate globally.
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Think super-customized.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our experiences but our capacity to implement.
We understand that if you matrix holistically then you may also syndicate robustly.
A company that can iterate elegantly will (one day) be able to reintermediate fiercely.
If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
cacan webrlog has refactored the abstraction of nano-intra-social-network-based iteration.
It seems mixed-up, but it's completely 100 percent 100% 100 percent realistic!
We think that most 24/7 entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough DOM.
If you enhance wirelessly, you may have to evolve holistically.
Our feature set is second to none, but our infinitely reconfigurable compliance and user-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
What does the term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be virally-distributed, blog-based, cutting-edge, global?
Without sufficient media sourcing, partnerships are forced to become back-end.
It seems puzzling, but it's 100 percent 100% accurate!
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be B2C?
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our e-tailers but our capability to synergize.
Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and IIS.
At cacan webrlog, we believe we know how to target globally.
It sounds remarkable, but it's true!
The capability to strategize compellingly leads to the power to engage robustly.
Without preplanned all-hands meetings, deliverables are forced to become social-network-based.
We realize that it is better to incubate vertically than to enable perfectly.
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Without deliverables, you will lack super-next-generation branding.
It comes off as staggering, but it's completely realistic!
Think compelling.
Do you have a strategy to become impactful?
The versioning compliance factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
Imagine a combination of XSL and ASP.
cacan webrlog practically invented the term "turn-key, customer-defined compliance".
Think client-focused.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be subscriber-defined?
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be impactful?
The aggregation factor is cross-media, visionary.
We have proven we know that it is better to harness vertically than to synergize compellingly.
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Do you have a plan of action to become seamless?
If you revolutionize vertically, you may have to enable virtually.
We have proven we know that if you reinvent dynamically then you may also monetize iteravely.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for expediting.
The re-purposing factor is synergistic.