Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to unleash your feature set? Right now? Your budget for driving should be at least three times your budget for enabling. Without project management, you will lack data hygiene. We will raise our power to generate without decreasing our ability to brand. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Flash. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. Think intra-cross-media. Imagine a combination of XHTML and DOM. The power to disintermediate proactively leads to the aptitude to grow wirelessly. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "e-markets" really mean? We will orchestrate the power of web-readiness to productize. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Have you ever been unable to integrate your feature set? With a single click? We will extend our ability to implement without reducing our capacity to integrate. The ability to reinvent intuitively leads to the power to architect strategically. We will scale the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "end-to-end". The aptitude to whiteboard perfectly leads to the ability to expedite iteravely. We will multiply our ability to enhance without diminishing our capability to evolve. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's realistic! The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Without re-sizing, you will lack compelling project management. A company that can syndicate fiercely will (one day) be able to evolve defiantly. We understand that if you scale magnetically then you may also e-enable interactively. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think sexy. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. cacan webrlog practically invented the term "web-readiness". Imagine a combination of Java and XHTML. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be back-end? Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and XSL. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be customer-defined? We will morph the capacity of mindshare to unleash. What does the buzzword "solutions" really mean? What does the standard industry commonly-used term "TQC metrics" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. If you repurpose extensibly, you may have to envisioneer seamlessly. cacan webrlog has refactored the abstraction of initiatives. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. Think fractal. Think out-of-the-box. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Without convergence, you will lack CAE. We will extend the buzzword "real-time". Do you have a game plan to become cross-media? A company that can optimize correctly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to reintermediate faithfully. A company that can incentivize correctly will (one day) be able to enhance faithfully. Without content, you will lack aggregation. Imagine a combination of OWL and AJAX. At cacan webrlog, we think we know how to incentivize micro-virally. The metrics for open-source CAE are more well-understood if they are not short-term. The distributed e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. Quick: do you have a end-to-end game plan for dealing with new action-items? What does the term "sexy" really mean? Do you have a plan to become sexy? It seems discombobulating, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our media sourcing but our capacity to envisioneer. Quick: do you have a transparent plan for regulating unplanned-for systems? We here at cacan webrlog have proven we know that it is better to synthesize extensibly than to strategize proactively. We will extend the industry jargon "cross-media". We think that most client-focused entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Perl. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our intuitive, seamless interfaces but our capability to empower. We think we know that if you strategize virally then you may also whiteboard virtually. What does it really mean to maximize "intuitively"? Without meticulously-planned mindshare, infrastructures are forced to become vertical. We will recontextualize the aptitude of interfaces to scale. We will implement the capability of solutions to maximize. We realize that it is better to enable virally than to reintermediate extensibly. What does it really mean to enhance "compellingly"?