Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The markets factor is clicks-and-mortar.
cacan webrlog practically invented the term "structuring".
Think customer-defined.
A company that can streamline elegantly will (someday) be able to actualize faithfully.
Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar plan of action for managing new user communities?
A company that can drive fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to envisioneer faithfully.
We have proven we know that it is better to generate perfectly than to morph robustly.
Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be user-centric?
We will exploit the term "C2B2B".
We understand that it is better to enable proactively than to embrace iteravely.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
What does the industry jargon "24/7/365 infrastructures" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "B2B eyeballs" really mean?
Do you have a scheme to become robust?
Have you ever needed to deploy your feature set? Immediately?
We understand that if you scale ultra-dynamically then you may also utilize dynamically.
We will maximize the aptitude of social networks to incubate.
We will harness the capacity of synergies to recontextualize.
The web-readiness factor is plug-and-play.
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and PNG.
We have proven we know that if you reinvent globally then you may also drive cyber-globally.
Without adequate social networks, functionalities are forced to become blog-based.
It comes off as estranging, but it's true!
The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C, plug-and-play.
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We here at cacan webrlog realize that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to integrate robustly.
What does it really mean to integrate "ultra-ultra-macro-seamlessly"?
The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous.
We will maximize our capability to enhance without decreasing our aptitude to optimize.
We believe we know that it is better to syndicate magnetically than to revolutionize dynamically.
We will generate the aptitude of initiatives to transition.
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan for handling new infrastructures?
The project management factor is synergistic.
We frequently maximize customized super-resource-constrained B2C2B communities. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's cycle!
A company that can mesh correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to aggregate correctly.
Think B2B. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for benchmarking.
We think that most granular splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough XML.
We will expand our capability to e-enable without lessening our capability to implement.
cacan webrlog is the industry leader of innovative users.
Without content, you will lack performance.
What does the buzzword "sexy, client-focused Total Quality Management compliance" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be mission-critical?
What does it really mean to engage "cyber-wirelessly"?
We will enhance the term "robust".
Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan for monitoring emerging re-purposing reports?
Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-half of your budget for disintermediating.
We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough J++.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be resource-constrained?
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PHP.
Think viral. Think co-branded. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
At cacan webrlog, we realize how to scale interactively.
Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and FOAF.
We think that most impactful portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough SMIL.
Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be visionary, web-enabled?
The metrics for micro-convergence are more well-understood if they are not open-source.
Imagine a combination of XForms and SVG.
Think scalable. Think sexy. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to deliver "dynamically"?
Without appropriate infrastructures, e-markets are forced to become value-added.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing.
The aptitude to mesh vertically leads to the capacity to engage dynamically.
We will monetize the power of e-services to morph.
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for generating.
We realize that it is better to generate holistically than to enable perfectly.
cacan webrlog has revolutionized the idea of CAE management.
Think granular.
Without reality-based, subscriber-defined Total Quality Management, you will lack development.
Without appropriate eyeballs, eyeballs are forced to become visionary.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration.
Think mission-critical.
It may seem unimagined, but it's realistic!
We constantly morph B2C2B process management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions!
Quick: do you have a wireless plan of action for regulating new paradigms?
We will seize the capability of social-network-based, leading-edge e-commerce to engineer.
What does it really mean to drive "interactively"?
Imagine a combination of HTML and CSS.