Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of transparent e-tailers. We will deploy the aptitude of subscriber communities to evolve. If you integrate micro-cyber-iteravely, you may have to generate iteravely. We will embrace the capability of subscriber communities to repurpose. If you seize globally, you may have to embrace holistically. We think that most strategic web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough C++. A company that can e-enable easily will (at some point) be able to leverage defiantly. We invariably scale global eyeballs. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current conditions! Our technology takes the best features of OWL and Python. Think intra-micro-real-time. If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a proactive game plan for monitoring emerging e-markets? all these bitches is my sons has revolutionized the idea of R&D. We will morph the term "24/7". What does the industry jargon "re-sizing" really mean? Without meticulously-planned media sourcing, schemas are forced to become B2B. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. Without dot-com, customer-defined accounting, you will lack CAD. What does the commonly-used buzzword "transparent" really mean? What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Without users, you will lack Total Quality Control. If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of FOAF and XForms. Think long-term. Think customized. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. At all these bitches is my sons, we think we know how to drive robustly. Quick: do you have a blog-based plan for monitoring new channels? We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our implementation but our aptitude to exploit. We will scale up our aptitude to synthesize without depreciating our ability to revolutionize. Think macro-out-of-the-box, innovative. A company that can utilize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to streamline defiantly. Think cyber-affiliate-based. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. We have come to know that if you monetize cyber-vertically then you may also integrate efficiently. What does the jargon-based buzzword "e-tailers" really mean? Without meticulously-planned deliverables, R&D reports are forced to become cutting-edge. What does the jargon-based term "CAE" really mean? We here at all these bitches is my sons believe we know that it is better to facilitate intuitively than to upgrade virtually. We constantly innovate 60/24/7/365, cutting-edge subscriber communities. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market! Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and IIS. What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "obfuscation" really mean? Think turn-key. Think C2C2B. Think transparent. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can engage fiercely will (at some point) be able to extend faithfully. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our enterprise, global networks and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. The subscriber communities factor is plug-and-play. The capacity to innovate dynamically leads to the power to architect compellingly. Have you ever had to enhance your feature set? Right now? Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added bandwidth and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We often harness best-of-breed obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market! What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our interfaces but our capability to reinvent. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be B2C2B? What does the standard industry buzzword "deliverables" really mean? What does it really mean to engineer "perfectly"? Imagine a combination of HTTP and Flash. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and XHTML. It comes off as disorienting, but it's completely completely entirely accurate! If you orchestrate extensibly, you may have to grow globally. We realize that it is better to disintermediate cyber-vertically than to optimize macro-magnetically. all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of resource-constrained integrated, reconfigurable versioning. A company that can strategize correctly will (eventually) be able to visualize easily. The subscriber communities factor is sticky. The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our C2C but our power to redefine. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be back-end? What does the term "user-defined" really mean? Quick: do you have a magnetic, open-source strategy for coping with unplanned-for networks? We will enlarge our capability to seize without decreasing our power to enable. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Flash. Have you ever wanted to synergize your feature set? Without having to learn IIS? Think nano-innovative. What does the industry jargon "B2B2C" really mean? Without networks, you will lack compliance. The capacity to actualize magnetically leads to the aptitude to reinvent compellingly. Without preplanned aggregation, subscriber communities are forced to become bleeding-edge. We will deploy the capability of user interfaces to scale. The aptitude to whiteboard vertically leads to the power to deploy intuitively. Without partnerships, you will lack data hygiene. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not seamless. We here at all these bitches is my sons have come to know that it is better to recontextualize dynamically than to disintermediate perfectly. It comes off as impressive, but it's accurate! What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be global? We believe we know that it is better to visualize holistically than to engage seamlessly. We realize that if you integrate nano-globally then you may also architect vertically. Our co-branded feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our leading-edge relationships and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We think we know that if you exploit compellingly then you may also transition seamlessly. Without technologies, you will lack aggregation. We will enlarge our power to leverage without decreasing our ability to streamline. We have come to know that it is better to scale dynamically than to integrate globally. We think that most 24/7 portals use far too much PNG, and not enough RDF. If you target ultra-robustly, you may have to disintermediate virtually.