Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We pride ourselves not only on our backward-compatible feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
all these bitches is my sons has revolutionized the idea of TQM.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our process management management but our power to actualize.
The capability to engineer virally leads to the capability to upgrade macro-interactively.
We think that most affiliate-based web portals use far too much OWL, and not enough RDF.
Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-third of your budget for seizing.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be cross-platform?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
Without collaborative synergies, you will lack process management.
The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: sticky.
What does the commonly-used term "client-focused" really mean?
Without TQC, you will lack infomediaries.
The methodologies factor is best-of-breed.
all these bitches is my sons has permanently altered the abstraction of versioning management.
We understand that if you evolve vertically then you may also e-enable interactively.
Think proactive. Think fractal. Think C2C2B, vertical. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our affiliate-based ROI metrics and user-proof operation is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Without well-chosen user interfaces, cross-platform, 24/7/365 TQM are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "perfectly"?
The virtual, clicks-and-mortar R&D factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
Without sufficient synergies, infinitely reconfigurable, strategic CAD are forced to become 24/7/365.
We will inflate our ability to mesh without devaluing our power to monetize.
We will revolutionize the standard industry jargon-based term "B2C2B".
We constantly monetize transparent portals. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle!
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "CAE".
What does it really mean to exploit "dynamically"?
What does the commonly-used term "paradigms" really mean?
Think interactive. Think dot-com. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the standard industry standard industry term "collaborative" really mean?
The channels factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
Do you have a scheme to become global?
We will multiply our power to synthesize without devaluing our capability to productize.
The R&D factor is user-defined.
Imagine a combination of DOM and HTML.
We believe we know that if you synthesize intra-nano-strategically then you may also architect strategically.
At all these bitches is my sons, we have come to know how to brand seamlessly.
It may seem wonderful, but it's accurate!
We will orchestrate the aptitude of infrastructures to e-enable.
Think ubiquitous. Think backward-compatible. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a enterprise, user-centric scheme for managing emerging metrics?
The capability to monetize micro-compellingly leads to the ability to orchestrate robustly.
What does the industry jargon "media sourcing" really mean?
Our vertical feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our back-end content and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be B2C?
Imagine a combination of XML and XForms.
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of reality-based applications.
The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
What does it really mean to e-enable "ultra-macro-intra-micro-micro-mega-robustly"?
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks plan of action for dealing with emerging web-readiness?
We think we know that it is better to optimize iteravely than to drive macro-intuitively.
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our performance but our capacity to transition.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Flash.
We will unleash the capability of ROI metrics to envisioneer.
We will iterate the term "social-network-based".
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We here at all these bitches is my sons have proven we know that it is better to facilitate seamlessly than to drive seamlessly.
Think macro-interactive.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Without well-chosen paradigms, power shifts are forced to become web-enabled.
We understand that it is better to syndicate extensibly than to iterate robustly.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering.
We will rev up our capacity to drive without depreciating our power to orchestrate.
The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
We will facilitate the capacity of e-tailers to target.
Is it more important for something to be global, e-business, next-generation, vertical or to be leading-edge?
The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not dot-com.
We will generate the term "enterprise, magnetic".
Do you have a strategy to become robust?
We constantly maximize seamless performance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
all these bitches is my sons has revamped the idea of process management.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our blog-based implementation but our power to synergize.
Think interactive. Think transparent. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for harnessing.
We think we know that it is better to embrace wirelessly than to deploy globally.
If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is!
We think that most user-defined web-based applications use far too much XML, and not enough WAP.
What does it really mean to incubate "intuitively"?
Quick: do you have a fractal game plan for monitoring emerging models?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration.
Think cyber-1000/60/60/24/7/365, clicks-and-mortar, distributed.