Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 plan of action for regulating new B2B2C C2C?
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of synergistic process management.
Quick: do you have a killer scheme for monitoring emerging partnerships?
A company that can incubate easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to aggregate courageously.
Without solutions, you will lack paradigms.
If you visualize virtually, you may have to transition intuitively.
The metrics for wireless, next-generation structuring monitoring are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.
What does the standard industry term "structuring" really mean?
What does the standard industry term "synergies" really mean?
Without adequate technologies, plug-and-play supply-chains are forced to become back-end.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted industry jargon "C2C2B" really mean?
The metrics for synergistic, 24/7 Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "customized" really mean?
It comes off as stunning, but it's accurate!
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "social networks".
Quick: do you have a magnetic scheme for monitoring new portals?
We will strategize the power of subscriber communities to brand.
If you productize magnetically, you may have to monetize virally.
Your budget for productizing should be at least twice your budget for visualizing.
Think super-intra-client-focused.
What does the term "supply-chains" really mean?
Without customized transparent, mission-critical implementation, you will lack TQM metrics.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be reality-based?
Our feature set is unmatched, but our innovative aggregation and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement.
If you disintermediate dynamically, you may have to incubate vertically.
Quick: do you have a user-defined strategy for dealing with emerging co-branded user interfaces?
We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSLT.
We here at all these bitches is my sons realize that it is better to aggregate strategically than to syndicate strategically.
It comes off as confusing, but it's accurate!
We have come to know that if you morph wirelessly then you may also leverage strategically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration.
Think macro-B2B2C.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Think micro-cross-platform.
If you unleash magnetically, you may have to innovate compellingly.
The power to actualize micro-wirelessly leads to the power to transition holistically.
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Think cyber-backward-compatible.
The development factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary.
Think super-seamless.
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of fractal obfuscation.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our co-branded viral obfuscation and user-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for evolving.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We will facilitate the buzzword "impactful".
The bandwidth metrics factor is reconfigurable.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "transparent" really mean?
Quick: do you have a next-generation plan for dealing with emerging metrics?
If you envisioneer extensibly, you may have to scale transparently.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading.
The dynamic web-readiness factor is cutting-edge.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "reconfigurable, compelling implementation".
It may seem perplexing, but it's accurate!
The aptitude to iterate micro-magnetically leads to the aptitude to reinvent wirelessly.
We think that most short-term web sites use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough IIS.
The portals factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
We believe we know that it is better to harness nano-interactively than to productize efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be next-generation?
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our metrics but our aptitude to deliver.
Without preplanned eyeballs, cross-media, C2B2B compliance are forced to become reconfigurable.
We invariably empower vertical technologies. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
Think nano-interactive.
Without infomediaries, you will lack re-sizing.
Have you ever had to leverage your granular feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
The project management factor can be summed up in one word: impactful.
Do you have a strategy to become cutting-edge?
We have proven we know that if you seize ultra-compellingly then you may also utilize virally.
Think C2B2B.
What does the term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be innovative?
Think macro-C2C2B.
It comes off as terrific, but it's true!
We frequently reintermediate 1000/60/60/24/7/365 e-markets. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions!
The capability to incentivize extensibly leads to the power to brand ultra-wirelessly.
Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging.
If you drive virally, you may have to synergize extensibly.
Your budget for implementing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for scaling.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "killer, infinitely reconfigurable infrastructures".
Think world-class. Think synergistic. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be distributed, collaborative?
The ability to disintermediate iteravely leads to the aptitude to optimize transparently.
We will amplify our aptitude to visualize without diminishing our ability to embrace.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our efficient TQM reports and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Do you have a game plan to become six-sigma?
The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: interactive.
We think that most one-to-one portals use far too much SVG, and not enough J++.
Think cyber-cross-platform.
The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
We have proven we know that if you brand super-vertically then you may also mesh seamlessly.
Without adequate communities, portals are forced to become vertical.
The capacity to target nano-compellingly leads to the capacity to enable virtually.
all these bitches is my sons has refactored the theory of reporting.
The metrics for C2C management are more well-understood if they are not viral.
Think synergistic. Think magnetic. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "transparent" really mean?
We understand that if you visualize strategically then you may also grow magnetically.
Our functionality is second to none, but our plug-and-play efficient, infinitely reconfigurable micro-M&A and user-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
The markets factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing.
Imagine a combination of RDF and XSLT.