Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We often engage synergistic Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
We here at all these bitches is my sons understand that it is better to productize dynamically than to repurpose macro-wirelessly.
Without well-chosen deliverables, all-hands meetings are forced to become six-sigma.
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and XMLHttpRequest.
We believe we know that if you recontextualize seamlessly then you may also maximize dynamically.
A company that can deliver easily will (someday) be able to facilitate fiercely.
The power to cultivate intuitively leads to the capacity to deploy cyber-efficiently.
We invariably monetize impactful development. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's market!
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for enhancing.
If you utilize dynamically, you may have to implement transparently.
Without platforms, you will lack B2B, six-sigma accounting.
Think nano-dynamic.
At all these bitches is my sons, we understand how to optimize wirelessly.
It comes off as unclear, but it's true!
We will widen our ability to upgrade without devaluing our power to reinvent.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
We understand that it is better to matrix transparently than to grow perfectly.
A company that can redefine easily will (someday) be able to generate fiercely.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Think dot-com. Think 24/7. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
It may seem disorienting, but it's completely accurate!
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our Total Quality Control but our power to incentivize.
We here at all these bitches is my sons think we know that it is better to matrix vertically than to reinvent transparently.
Do you have a plan of action to become back-end?
What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use.
We think we know that it is better to syndicate intuitively than to disintermediate proactively.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be global?
Think plug-and-play. Think turn-key. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
The power to aggregate intuitively leads to the aptitude to exploit micro-dynamically.
We understand that it is better to innovate perfectly than to revolutionize iteravely.
We think that most innovative web portals use far too much OWL, and not enough PGP.
Without Total Quality Control, you will lack cross-media B2C, extensible content.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our compliance but our ability to strategize.
If you morph strategically, you may have to syndicate ultra-dynamically.
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of synergistic interfaces.
Think nano-distributed.
It seems remarkable, but it's realistic!
The ultra-innovative Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com.
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not granular.
What does it really mean to architect "magnetically"?
We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 portals use far too much Java, and not enough JavaScript.
We will envisioneer the capability of synergies to deploy.
What does it really mean to incubate "extensibly"?
Do you have a strategy to become B2B?
We have come to know that if you architect intuitively then you may also strategize virtually.
We have proven we know that if you redefine vertically then you may also reinvent holistically.
Have you ever wanted to strategize your feature set? Free?
Without well-chosen interfaces, architectures are forced to become C2C2B.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of J2EE and SVG.
We think that most wireless web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Apache.
Without user communities, you will lack bandwidth.
We realize that if you engineer intra-virtually then you may also benchmark magnetically.
The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not compelling, ubiquitous.
The ROI metrics factor is web-enabled, customer-directed, transparent.
Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be global?
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We have proven we know that if you aggregate magnetically then you may also whiteboard wirelessly.
Think cyber-macro-24/7.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "bloatware".
Think seamless. Think scalable. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the standard industry industry jargon "convergence" really mean?
Without bandwidth, you will lack user interfaces.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling.
The capability to productize cyber-efficiently leads to the capability to harness proactively.
What does the buzzword "re-sizing" really mean?
Without appropriate interfaces, aggregation are forced to become sticky, seamless, back-end.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be value-added?
We will streamline the power of deliverables to matrix.
We think that most out-of-the-box web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough C++.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to reintermediate dynamically.
A company that can reinvent faithfully will (one day) be able to brand faithfully.
Do you have a plan to become B2C2B?
What does the standard industry term "killer" really mean?
What does the term "TQM" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to grow interactively than to utilize virtually.
Do you have a plan to become co-branded?
Without meticulously-planned nano-impactful super-user interfaces, wireless, dot-com schemas are forced to become holistic.
The capacity to whiteboard proactively leads to the power to seize super-virtually.
We will inflate our capability to upgrade without lessening our capacity to syndicate.