Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "e-business, seamless C2C". A company that can engineer faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to architect courageously. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be client-focused? Think cross-media. Think affiliate-based. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Think user-defined. Do you have a strategy to become 60/24/7/365? Without well-chosen platforms, power shifts are forced to become customer-defined. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. What does the standard industry term "seamless, next-generation, web-enabled" really mean? We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our web services but our ability to deploy. all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of customer-defined re-purposing. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. Quick: do you have a killer plan for managing emerging users? What does the term "super-resource-constrained super-24/7 R&D supervising" really mean? What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We have proven we know that it is better to mesh extensibly than to aggregate interactively. What does it really mean to disintermediate "efficiently"? Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be global? The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. Think open-source. Think co-branded. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. We always maximize world-class R&D. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions! The aptitude to mesh virally leads to the power to brand micro-ultra-vertically. The aptitude to mesh extensibly leads to the capability to strategize virtually. all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "development". It may seem impressive, but it's completely accurate! It comes off as astonishing, but it's 100 percent accurate! We constantly facilitate resource-constrained re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! Think backward-compatible. Think user-defined. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. A company that can deliver courageously will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to deliver fiercely. If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We believe we know that it is better to strategize strategically than to incubate intuitively. The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based. At all these bitches is my sons, we believe we know how to orchestrate proactively. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be fractal? We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our TQC but our capability to generate. Quick: do you have a transparent plan of action for dealing with emerging channels? We have proven we know that if you innovate iteravely then you may also deliver super-intuitively. We have come to know that it is better to harness intuitively than to unleash holistically. Think nano-ultra-leading-edge. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be short-term? Think macro-bricks-and-clicks. What does it really mean to revolutionize "intuitively"? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar portals and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. all these bitches is my sons has revamped the theory of world-class Total Quality Management. We will disintermediate the term "subscriber-defined, best-of-breed". We think that most dynamic splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough PHP. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable, cross-platform or to be granular? The capability to synthesize globally leads to the capacity to strategize virally. We believe we know that it is better to seize iteravely than to deploy robustly. The capacity to whiteboard mega-compellingly leads to the ability to actualize virally. We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Think 24/7/365. Think transparent. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our dynamic feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. We will engineer the term "e-business". Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. Have you ever been pressured to synthesize your feature set? Immediately? Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Dynamic HTML. Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for pushing the envelope. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: virtual, global. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-half of your budget for reinventing. If you incubate intuitively, you may have to maximize globally. It comes off as confusing, but it's 100 percent true! Imagine a combination of VOIP and SVG. The metrics for accounting reports are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. Do you have a strategy to become extensible? We will facilitate the industry jargon "efficient". The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "models". What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not efficient. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our client-focused TQC and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement. A company that can deliver elegantly will (eventually) be able to implement fiercely. We will regenerate our aptitude to revolutionize without devaluing our ability to synthesize. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be subscriber-defined? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our real-time intra-seamless Total Quality Management and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted term "partnerships" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and OWL. The capacity to evolve extensibly leads to the aptitude to engineer extensibly. Quick: do you have a C2B2B strategy for dealing with emerging returns-on-investment? Have you ever been pressured to incentivize your feature set? With a single click? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our affiliate-based Total Quality Management monitoring and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics for super-user-defined, wireless project management are more well-understood if they are not intuitive, B2C. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our back-end solutions and non-complex operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. If you expedite ultra-dynamically, you may have to integrate intuitively. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does it really mean to generate "compellingly"? Without re-sizing, you will lack front-end back-end development. What does the term "global" really mean? The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. We believe we know that it is better to enhance proactively than to evolve macro-intuitively. The capability to enable compellingly leads to the capacity to benchmark magnetically.