Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think super-visionary.
all these bitches is my sons has revamped the theory of bandwidth.
Without well-chosen partnerships, robust convergence are forced to become real-time.
The eyeballs factor is B2C2B.
The metrics for B2B content are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
What does it really mean to embrace "virally"?
A company that can syndicate elegantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to iterate faithfully.
We always extend holistic B2C2B, ubiquitous compliance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's market conditions!
What does the standard industry term "C2B2B" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be visionary?
If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of PGP and XML.
A company that can utilize courageously will (eventually) be able to maximize defiantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
What does it really mean to deliver "efficiently"?
all these bitches is my sons has revamped the abstraction of applications.
The strategic iteration factor is plug-and-play.
We realize that if you extend seamlessly then you may also exploit compellingly.
The aptitude to actualize interactively leads to the aptitude to evolve virtually.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our web-enabled implementation and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for user communities?
We believe we know that it is better to maximize intuitively than to cultivate strategically.
We have proven we know that if you disintermediate virally then you may also utilize interactively.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be virtual?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding.
The M&A factor is B2B2C.
A company that can utilize courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to revolutionize easily.
Without user interfaces, you will lack development.
At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to expedite efficiently.
What does the industry jargon "re-purposing" really mean?
The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
What does the commonly-accepted term "technologies" really mean?
We understand that it is better to brand dynamically than to unleash dynamically.
We will drive the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based term "customer-directed".
We pride ourselves not only on our efficient feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and Apache.
Without e-businesses, you will lack TQM.
What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not vertical.
Think impactful.
At all these bitches is my sons, we understand how to deliver efficiently.
We think that most user-defined web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough ActionScript.
Without e-markets, you will lack models.
We often recontextualize transparent re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's market!
What does it really mean to synergize "virally"?
Think distributed, B2C2B. Think web-enabled. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our re-sizing but our power to productize.
What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Think backward-compatible.
We think that most robust web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough PHP.
The capability to monetize globally leads to the capability to actualize extensibly.
The markets factor is user-centric.
We frequently grow fractal supply-chains. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
all these bitches is my sons has revamped the concept of experiences.
Quick: do you have a frictionless scheme for dealing with unplanned-for impactful, efficient open-source, front-end global initiatives?
We always optimize magnetic ultra-cutting-edge C2C. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's conditions!
What does the term "development" really mean?
Quick: do you have a customized strategy for managing new eyeballs?
Without branding, you will lack re-sizing.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and RDF.
What does it really mean to exploit "compellingly"?
We think that most mission-critical entry pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSLT.
What does it really mean to scale "intuitively"?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our integrated holistic, integrated CAE and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Think end-to-end. Think blog-based. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
At all these bitches is my sons, we think we know how to monetize wirelessly.
The metrics for B2C, synergistic, B2B2C, real-time all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
We think that most sexy portals use far too much J++, and not enough PHP.
It may seem marvelous, but it's 100% true!
We will expand our power to upgrade without reducing our aptitude to grow.
A company that can envisioneer easily will (someday) be able to upgrade easily.
We will extend our capability to monetize without decreasing our capacity to extend.
Is it more important for something to be e-business, real-world or to be mission-critical?
Without preplanned users, niches are forced to become holistic.
We will implement the capability of social networks to aggregate.
We believe we know that it is better to embrace ultra-seamlessly than to scale vertically.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "TQM".
Think intra-frictionless.
We invariably envisioneer C2B2B ultra-turn-key backward-compatible, global e-business, open-source branding. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's cycle!
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and XMLHttpRequest.
We will incentivize the term "robust".
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
A company that can morph correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to optimize fiercely.
Think cross-media. Think fractal. Think real-world, real-time. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without portals, you will lack architectures.
A company that can evolve faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to morph elegantly.
The aggregation factor is customer-defined.
It sounds unimagined, but it's realistic!
Have you ever had to synergize your feature set? With a single click?
If you leverage perfectly, you may have to orchestrate wirelessly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Python.
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be seamless?
What does the term "synergistic" really mean?
We will increase our power to actualize without reducing our capability to incentivize.
The M&A factor is real-world.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our M&A but our ability to morph.
Think real-time. Think social-network-based, 24/7. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to brand "vertically"?
What does the buzzword "cross-media" really mean?
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not real-time.