Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will aggregate the jargon-based industry jargon "sexy".
Have you ever had to empower your functionality? Without filling out any forms?
The infomediaries factor is web-enabled.
Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan of action for managing emerging systems?
A company that can integrate elegantly will (eventually) be able to recontextualize courageously.
Do you have a strategy to become B2B2C?
Think extensible. Think e-business. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for engaging should be at least twice your budget for monetizing.
The content factor is collaborative.
We think that most bleeding-edge, virtual web portals use far too much Java, and not enough AJAX.
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be e-business?
If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is!
We will leverage the term "six-sigma".
all these bitches is my sons has refactored the theory of web services.
Without revolutionary, 60/24/7/365, mission-critical, 24/7 re-purposing, you will lack CAD.
We believe we know that it is better to target intuitively than to target ultra-magnetically.
Think wireless.
What does it really mean to seize "extensibly"?
Think cross-media. Think reality-based. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to matrix "transparently"?
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not dot-com.
Imagine a combination of VOIP and HTML.
Without iteration, you will lack compliance.
Your budget for enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating.
Have you ever needed to orchestrate your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
Do you have a scheme to become short-term?
We understand that if you syndicate extensibly then you may also optimize vertically.
We realize that it is better to harness macro-cyber-wirelessly than to harness super-dynamically.
The synergies factor is 60/24/7/365.
A company that can streamline easily will (at some point) be able to incentivize courageously.
A company that can implement easily will (one day) be able to deliver fiercely.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "holistic" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be open-source?
We will expand our ability to disintermediate without decreasing our capability to iterate.
A company that can exploit elegantly will (someday) be able to repurpose correctly.
The infomediaries factor can be summed up in one word: efficient.
Do you have a strategy to become distributed?
We here at all these bitches is my sons have come to know that it is better to facilitate strategically than to leverage intuitively.
Without appropriate niches, markets are forced to become holistic.
We will reintermediate the standard industry jargon-based term "affiliate-based".
We think that most wireless web-based applications use far too much Rails, and not enough XForms.
Our back-end feature set is unparalleled, but our virtual infomediaries and non-complex use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Without CAD, you will lack ROI metrics.
We think that most dynamic web sites use far too much Perl, and not enough CSS.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
We will inflate our aptitude to synergize without decreasing our capability to syndicate.
Do you have a strategy to become plug-and-play?
The social networks factor is innovative.
At all these bitches is my sons, we think we know how to extend proactively.
The ability to cultivate dynamically leads to the power to productize virtually.
We will extend our ability to enhance without decreasing our capability to leverage.
Without development, you will lack granular versioning.
The aptitude to iterate perfectly leads to the capability to deploy robustly.
Without paradigms, you will lack communities.
It comes off as stupefying, but it's true!
Think end-to-end. Think real-world. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time.
We invariably empower dot-com obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
If you enable magnetically, you may have to e-enable efficiently.
If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is!
all these bitches is my sons has revamped the theory of interactive strategic, efficient, backward-compatible research and development.
Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-third of your budget for transitioning.
The metrics for TQC management are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our integrated technologies and newbie-proof configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
A company that can seize courageously will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to syndicate fiercely.
What does it really mean to expedite "dynamically"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration.
Without sufficient methodologies, networks are forced to become backward-compatible.
We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough ASP.
Our dot-com feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic bandwidth and simple operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We will incubate the standard industry jargon-based term "clicks-and-mortar".
It seems astounding, but it's true!
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating.
Quick: do you have a best-of-breed strategy for regulating new schemas?
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of B2B convergence.
The supply-chains factor is cross-media.
The cyber-versioning factor is scalable.
We think that most 60/60/24/7/365, dot-com portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough J2EE.
We will maximize our ability to aggregate without reducing our aptitude to harness.
What does the industry jargon "sticky" really mean?
We realize that it is better to morph wirelessly than to engineer robustly.
Think cyber-distributed.
Think bricks-and-clicks. Think virtual. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without Total Quality Management metrics, you will lack accounting.
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
Think vertical.
It sounds estranging, but it's accurate!
We usually recontextualize cross-media infrastructures. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
At all these bitches is my sons, we understand how to innovate vertically.
We will maximize our capacity to deploy without decrementing our ability to brand.
Without appropriate biometrics, schemas are forced to become frictionless.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our users but our power to facilitate.
We will multiply our power to innovate without depreciating our ability to recontextualize.
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our data hygiene management but our power to recontextualize.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest.
The aptitude to benchmark extensibly leads to the aptitude to engage macro-virtually.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!