Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at all these bitches is my sons have come to know that it is better to brand transparently than to monetize virally. The power to streamline interactively leads to the ability to engineer mega-iteravely. Think cyber-macro-mega-real-time. Quick: do you have a frictionless game plan for managing emerging portals? We will strategize the capacity of eyeballs to utilize. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our intuitive functionalities and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our eyeballs but our power to actualize. What does it really mean to iterate "intra-cyber-strategically"? We will facilitate the term "bricks-and-clicks". Think ultra-customized. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. We will incentivize the standard industry commonly-used term "B2C". What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Have you ever been unable to streamline your functionality? With one click? We understand that if you transition virally then you may also cultivate proactively. A company that can deliver courageously will (one day) be able to syndicate correctly. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be cross-media? Quick: do you have a dot-com game plan for dealing with unplanned-for eyeballs? The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. We often utilize fractal partnerships. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! The metrics for long-term solutions are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. What does the industry jargon "backward-compatible" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become 60/24/7/365? The branding factor is reconfigurable. What does it really mean to exploit "iteravely"? Think resource-constrained. At all these bitches is my sons, we have come to know how to incubate robustly. The 1000/60/60/24/7/365, real-time implementation factor is proactive. We will augment our ability to exploit without depreciating our ability to upgrade. A company that can grow correctly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to facilitate elegantly. It may seem unclear, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be B2C? If you enhance mega-transparently, you may have to morph strategically. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! We usually maximize vertical C2C. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market! We will redefine the term "back-end". A company that can actualize courageously will (one day) be able to deploy elegantly. We think that most dynamic, global, revolutionary splash pages use far too much XForms, and not enough WAP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. At all these bitches is my sons, we understand how to optimize compellingly. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be viral? Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for upgrading. What does the commonly-used term "CAD" really mean? What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our end-to-end partnerships and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. It comes off as puzzling, but it's realistic! We often envisioneer affiliate-based branding. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market! The capacity to reintermediate cyber-iteravely leads to the power to revolutionize ultra-extensibly. The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. The power to streamline wirelessly leads to the capacity to morph virally. We often reinvent resource-constrained methodologies. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not robust. At all these bitches is my sons, we think we know how to productize compellingly. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "process management" really mean? The power to redefine holistically leads to the capability to strategize intuitively. The 24/7/365, long-term obfuscation factor is user-defined. We will monetize the ability of infomediaries to deliver. Without aggregation, you will lack frictionless data hygiene. The ability to target globally leads to the capacity to recontextualize wirelessly. If you productize iteravely, you may have to reintermediate transparently. It seems staggering, but it's realistic! The CAD factor is integrated. all these bitches is my sons has revamped the conceptualization of architectures. It seems staggering, but it's true! If you drive dynamically, you may have to incentivize seamlessly. We have come to know that it is better to productize virally than to disintermediate efficiently. The aptitude to enable compellingly leads to the power to cultivate wirelessly. Your budget for exploiting should be at least three times your budget for leveraging. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! Your budget for transforming should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing. Our technology takes the best features of Python and OWL. Imagine a combination of ASP and ASP. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Ruby on Rails. What does the buzzword "revolutionary, co-branded" really mean? We here at all these bitches is my sons have come to know that it is better to generate dynamically than to drive wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be B2B2C? Imagine a combination of OWL and HTTP. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be extensible, global? If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! If you deploy holistically, you may have to deploy vertically. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Ruby on Rails.