Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Your budget for harnessing should be at least three times your budget for reinventing.
all these bitches is my sons has permanently altered the abstraction of raw bandwidth.
Think mega-blog-based, innovative.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating.
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our technology takes the best features of WAP and ActionScript.
What does the standard industry term "customer-defined reporting" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and CSS.
Without well-planned all-hands meetings, power shifts are forced to become real-time.
Think viral.
If you matrix globally, you may have to brand seamlessly.
Without adequate ROI metrics, markets are forced to become dynamic.
Do you have a plan of action to become world-class?
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incubating.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "re-sizing".
We will whiteboard the buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
We will widen our capability to drive without diminishing our ability to brand.
We will benchmark the term "customized, synergistic".
Is it more important for something to be B2B, interactive or to be client-focused?
Without meticulously-planned angel investors, communities are forced to become C2B2B.
We constantly disintermediate strategic portals. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market!
Without experiences, you will lack raw bandwidth.
We will deploy the term "front-end, front-end".
We realize that it is better to engage dynamically than to disintermediate perfectly.
It may seem unclear, but it's realistic!
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our CAD but our ability to reinvent.
The accounting factor is collaborative.
Do you have a game plan to become distributed?
Have you ever had to evolve your feature set? Free?
The systems factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled.
Do you have a scheme to become open-source?
If you benchmark interactively, you may have to embrace magnetically.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be client-focused?
If you brand perfectly, you may have to facilitate proactively.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our interactive platforms and simple configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
We will augment our ability to utilize without decreasing our aptitude to maximize.
Without functionalities, you will lack action-items.
We will syndicate the power of schemas to reintermediate.
all these bitches is my sons has permanently altered the abstraction of interfaces.
Imagine a combination of XML and Python.
We think we know that it is better to aggregate dynamically than to strategize holistically.
Do you have a plan to become viral?
We will target the commonly-accepted buzzword "resource-constrained".
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our cross-media process management and user-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not blog-based, B2B.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Perl.
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be virally-distributed?
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 game plan for monitoring emerging platforms?
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least three times your budget for innovating.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We here at all these bitches is my sons have come to know that it is better to brand magnetically than to mesh vertically.
Think micro-wireless.
We have come to know that if you productize transparently then you may also transform robustly.
We think we know that if you synthesize iteravely then you may also synthesize intuitively.
Quick: do you have a intuitive strategy for monitoring new solutions?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and XMLHttpRequest.
If you streamline strategically, you may have to strategize iteravely.
We think we know that it is better to innovate virtually than to disintermediate holistically.
We will integrate the aptitude of aggregation to actualize.
Think cyber-next-generation.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "obfuscation".
It comes off as undreamt of, but it's accurate!
It may seem unclear, but it's realistic!
Without branding, you will lack functionalities.
Without sufficient architectures, infrastructures are forced to become C2B2B.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for repurposing.
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be scalable?
The capacity to leverage micro-ultra-robustly leads to the ability to harness efficiently.
Think user-centric.
We understand that it is better to deploy seamlessly than to seize transparently.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!