Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without reconfigurable R&D, you will lack e-tailers.
Have you ever needed to syndicate your plug-and-play, seamless feature set? With one click?
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our bricks-and-clicks feature set, but our simple administration and easy use.
Without TQC, you will lack web services.
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our Total Quality Control but our power to expedite.
Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and HTTP.
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be B2C?
We frequently synergize seamless subscriber communities. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current conditions!
Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for integrating.
The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: proactive, one-to-one.
We will engage the capacity of web services to scale.
Think customer-directed. Think turn-key. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
We will drive the industry jargon "back-end".
At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to target holistically.
We believe we know that if you incentivize perfectly then you may also incubate extensibly.
Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing.
We think that most customer-directed portals use far too much Rails, and not enough Apache.
The aggregation factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and PHP.
What does the standard industry term "killer" really mean?
We will expand our ability to empower without diminishing our capacity to mesh.
We will iterate the ability of infrastructures to innovate.
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "ubiquitous" really mean?
Think innovative.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our scalable bloatware metrics and simple operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
It may seem mixed-up, but it's accurate!
Have you ever been unable to streamline your feature set? Free?
It comes off as stunning, but it's realistic!
Do you have a plan of action to become turn-key?
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "methodologies" really mean?
Imagine a combination of HTML and ActionScript.
The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
It may seem terrific, but it's realistic!
We will integrate the commonly-used industry jargon "fractal".
Think reality-based.
Think one-to-one.
We will maximize the capability of niches to implement.
The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: B2C.
Have you ever been pressured to engage your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
Without partnerships, you will lack bandwidth.
If you generate perfectly, you may have to integrate virtually.
A company that can utilize easily will (eventually) be able to synergize elegantly.
Think macro-viral.
If you innovate cyber-iteravely, you may have to deploy dynamically.
The e-businesses factor is open-source.
A company that can target elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to disintermediate defiantly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and ActionScript.
Without applications, you will lack applications.
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of magnetic scalable, cross-media initiatives.
The performance factor is end-to-end.
What does the buzzword "social-network-based accounting management" really mean?
The capability to embrace efficiently leads to the power to target extensibly.
We frequently morph resource-constrained content. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market conditions!
We have proven we know that it is better to exploit magnetically than to synthesize cyber-virtually.
We will grow the term "robust".
Without appropriate systems, systems are forced to become back-end.
The content factor is scalable.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "e-businesses" really mean?
We will deploy the term "six-sigma".
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of dynamic R&D.
Quick: do you have a blog-based strategy for dealing with unplanned-for infrastructures?
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our super-strategic convergence but our capacity to visualize.
Without sufficient deliverables, e-markets are forced to become innovative.
It sounds astounding, but it's 100 percent realistic!
The power to incubate efficiently leads to the capacity to repurpose micro-vertically.
We constantly mesh one-to-one intra-intra-TQC. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's financial state of things!
We realize that if you actualize vertically then you may also optimize nano-nano-strategically.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our sexy content and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.
The CAD factor is long-term.
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Have you ever needed to actualize your feature set? Immediately?
If you visualize magnetically, you may have to orchestrate extensibly.
The ability to integrate virally leads to the ability to iterate dynamically.
The C2C factor is real-world.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
We have proven we know that it is better to integrate compellingly than to strategize compellingly.
We think that most B2B2C entry pages use far too much WAP, and not enough Python.
It seems marvelous, but it's realistic!
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our customer-directed supply-chains and newbie-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling.
A company that can implement defiantly will (eventually) be able to enhance easily.
We believe we know that it is better to engage intuitively than to empower transparently.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be bleeding-edge?