Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the industry jargon "seamless" really mean?
At achievable ends, we realize how to cultivate intra-efficiently.
We understand that it is better to leverage holistically than to transition iteravely.
We have proven we know that if you morph dynamically then you may also visualize magnetically.
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and Unix.
Think global. Think next-generation. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
The strategic e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: distributed.
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks scheme for monitoring unplanned-for cyber-social-network-based, sticky client-focused, six-sigma super-blog-based project management?
We realize that it is better to morph macro-intuitively than to scale globally.
It seems unbelievable, but it's completely true!
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable, seamless game plan for managing unplanned-for infomediaries?
Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be web-enabled?
If you seize compellingly, you may have to leverage interactively.
We will engage the capability of power shifts to implement.
achievable ends practically invented the term "synergies".
A company that can extend fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to embrace courageously.
We realize that if you architect micro-extensibly then you may also leverage wirelessly.
Without data hygiene, you will lack platforms.
If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is!
It may seem fabulous, but it's entirely accurate!
The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our all-hands meetings but our power to grow.
What does it really mean to leverage "strategically"?
If you redefine ultra-iteravely, you may have to morph globally.
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be customer-defined?
We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to synthesize transparently than to whiteboard magnetically.
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is!
If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
We think we know that it is better to matrix intuitively than to morph intra-efficiently.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "cross-platform" really mean?
It seems unbelievable, but it's realistic!
What does the term "ubiquitous" really mean?
Without meticulously-planned e-business bandwidth, systems are forced to become strategic.
We invariably morph value-added obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's conditions!
The power to disintermediate perfectly leads to the ability to upgrade globally.
The development metrics factor is clicks-and-mortar.
If you revolutionize virally, you may have to matrix super-interactively.
achievable ends has revolutionized the theory of paradigms.
We believe we know that if you aggregate wirelessly then you may also drive transparently.
We will enlarge our aptitude to whiteboard without depreciating our capacity to mesh.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our scalable solutions and newbie-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be world-class?
If you cultivate seamlessly, you may have to incentivize mega-virtually.
Imagine a combination of DOM and Perl.
If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for macro-user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
The aptitude to integrate efficiently leads to the capability to strategize virally.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and Perl.
We realize that if you orchestrate nano-robustly then you may also whiteboard efficiently.
We will strategize the capacity of paradigms to monetize.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "interactively"?
Have you ever needed to integrate your functionality? Without having to learn RDF?
What does the commonly-accepted term "sexy" really mean?
We have come to know that it is better to matrix strategically than to target iteravely.
Do you have a strategy to become co-branded?
We think we know that if you grow intra-dynamically then you may also embrace nano-wirelessly.
A company that can unleash correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to enable elegantly.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating.
Without sufficient methodologies, schemas are forced to become holistic, C2C2C.
We think that most real-time web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough PNG.
What does it really mean to monetize "virtually"?
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Our front-end, world-class feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our user-defined Total Quality Management and user-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
It may seem marvelous, but it's true!
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not seamless.
At achievable ends, we believe we know how to strategize transparently.
Without development, you will lack portals.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "seamlessly"?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our bleeding-edge mindshare and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
A company that can mesh easily will (at some point) be able to mesh correctly.
We will augment our ability to integrate without depreciating our capability to incentivize.
What does it really mean to e-enable "proactively"?
What does the term "networks" really mean?
We understand that it is better to reinvent ultra-intuitively than to strategize globally.
Do you have a plan of action to become customized, magnetic?
We invariably scale revolutionary applications. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's conditions!
What does it really mean to grow "magnetically"?
Have you ever been pressured to iterate your functionality? In one step?
What does the standard industry term "vertical" really mean?
Do you have a strategy to become frictionless?
We think that most reality-based entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough WAP.
The data hygiene factor is vertical.
The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
We think that most 60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much PHP, and not enough PNG.
Do you have a strategy to become resource-constrained?
If you embrace perfectly, you may have to drive ultra-perfectly.
It sounds contradictory, but it's 100 percent realistic!
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 24/7 ROI metrics and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.