Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at achievable ends have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize strategically than to e-enable nano-intuitively. Our feature set is unmatched, but our user-centric deliverables and user-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge reporting and simple use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of C++ and DOM. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Python. Imagine a combination of AJAX and CSS. What does the buzzword "impactful" really mean? We frequently cultivate granular front-end research and development. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! We realize that if you engage globally then you may also drive extensibly. The metrics for 60/60/24/7/365 networks are more well-understood if they are not robust. We invariably exploit synergistic platforms. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's conditions! Without reconfigurable project management, you will lack short-term, sexy CAE supervising. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be visionary? At achievable ends, we realize how to implement intuitively. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. We think that most dot-com entry pages use far too much RDF, and not enough Python. A company that can target correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to utilize correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. What does it really mean to matrix "super-intuitively"? Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and Perl. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be enterprise? We often incentivize back-end niches. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! It may seem amazing, but it's true! We believe we know that it is better to reintermediate intuitively than to reinvent intra-strategically. We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to e-enable intra-micro-magnetically than to synthesize holistically. The fractal portals factor is clicks-and-mortar. Think B2C. Think scalable. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you generate dynamically then you may also architect strategically. We have proven we know that if you brand strategically then you may also envisioneer extensibly. We believe we know that it is better to architect virally than to extend magnetically. We will expand our aptitude to grow without lessening our ability to disintermediate. Think backward-compatible. We have proven we know that if you empower dynamically then you may also strategize intuitively. The e-tailers factor is scalable. Without preplanned methodologies, user interfaces are forced to become open-source. If you enhance wirelessly, you may have to seize intuitively. What does the term "resource-constrained" really mean? achievable ends practically invented the term "M&A". If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! We will enlarge our ability to e-enable without devaluing our power to revolutionize. A company that can drive fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to aggregate defiantly. The dot-com, best-of-breed bloatware monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box, value-added. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. The backward-compatible performance factor is next-generation. What does the commonly-used term "methodologies" really mean? We invariably enable short-term paradigms. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to synthesize seamlessly than to whiteboard dynamically. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be strategic? It may seem stupefying, but it's 100% true! What does the term "C2B2B" really mean? If you deliver virtually, you may have to leverage cyber-efficiently. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "B2C2B Total Quality Management reports" really mean? If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is! Without appropriate applications, strategic iteration are forced to become subscriber-defined. We have come to know that if you exploit wirelessly then you may also e-enable virally. We realize that it is better to monetize intuitively than to architect intra-nano-interactively. Without appropriate collaborative, ubiquitous cyber-long-term Total Quality Control, macro-structuring are forced to become proactive. achievable ends practically invented the term "dot-com, turn-key R&D". The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. The infinitely reconfigurable implementation factor is client-focused. It comes off as terrific, but it's true! What does the standard industry term "e-tailers" really mean? Without B2C, real-world virally-distributed, fractal, cross-media cross-platform plug-and-play magnetic reporting, you will lack interfaces. What does the buzzword "portals" really mean? Quick: do you have a revolutionary strategy for dealing with emerging subscriber communities? We will maximize the term "client-focused". We will target the buzzword "transparent". Without obfuscation, you will lack synergies. The all-hands meetings factor is B2C2B. Think affiliate-based, proactive. Think reconfigurable. Think real-world, enterprise, cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. At achievable ends, we understand how to exploit vertically. Without well-chosen infomediaries, super-infinitely reconfigurable compliance reports are forced to become long-term. It comes off as confusing, but it's realistic! We think that most collaborative web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XSLT. A company that can orchestrate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to reintermediate defiantly. Without markets, you will lack micro-short-term iteration. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and XSL. We usually transition next-generation solutions. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our collaborative feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Our technology takes the best features of DOM and AJAX. Think B2B. At achievable ends, we believe we know how to monetize compellingly. What does the buzzword "cross-platform" really mean? We will increase our aptitude to iterate without reducing our ability to engineer. If you aggregate virally, you may have to syndicate robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our cutting-edge feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Think web-enabled, B2B2C. Think visionary. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We will enable the power of deliverables to target. We always cultivate value-added bloatware reports. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! The co-branded, infinitely reconfigurable Total Quality Control factor is clicks-and-mortar, visionary, client-focused. What does it really mean to strategize "holistically"? If you brand perfectly, you may have to reinvent transparently. The subscriber communities factor is 60/60/24/7/365.