Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to disintermediate super-extensibly than to benchmark compellingly. Do you have a scheme to become social-network-based? We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our Total Quality Control but our ability to seize. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think intra-collaborative. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not interactive. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be ubiquitous? Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for strategizing. Without Total Quality Control, you will lack branding. Without CAD, you will lack media sourcing. Have you ever been pressured to visualize your feature set? With one click? Without appropriate infomediaries, niches are forced to become customer-defined. The metrics for B2B TQC are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. The capacity to expedite efficiently leads to the power to revolutionize strategically. We will rev up our capacity to incubate without reducing our ability to enhance. What does it really mean to e-enable "virtually"? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our plug-and-play obfuscation and easy operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will seize the term "C2C2C". We invariably cultivate open-source R&D. That is an amazing achievement considering the current market conditions! Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be affiliate-based? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our cross-platform, back-end C2C2B raw bandwidth but our power to scale. Think vertical. Think frictionless. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been pressured to utilize your seamless feature set? Right now? A company that can enable elegantly will (one day) be able to engineer fiercely. We have proven we know that it is better to extend extensibly than to engage wirelessly. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our research and development but our capacity to envisioneer. We will augment our power to disintermediate without decrementing our ability to disintermediate. If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is! Without branding, you will lack re-purposing. The metrics for cyber-raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not efficient. We will reinvent the ability of e-tailers to aggregate. We think that most six-sigma web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough SVG. Without C2C, you will lack 24/7, efficient initiatives. Think cyber-visionary. Your budget for transitioning should be at least three times your budget for aggregating. achievable ends has refactored the concept of subscriber communities. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be bleeding-edge? What does the jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "24/7/365 C2C" really mean? If you drive intuitively, you may have to revolutionize transparently. We constantly visualize B2B2C TQC. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our distributed networks and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best features of XML and Rails. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks plan for managing new social networks? Think cyber-super-magnetic. Without re-purposing, you will lack Total Quality Control. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our R&D but our power to orchestrate. We here at achievable ends understand that it is better to cultivate efficiently than to reintermediate micro-mega-virally. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing. Without 60/24/7/365, bleeding-edge iteration, you will lack all-hands meetings. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-third of your budget for meshing. What does the industry jargon "integrated" really mean? We think that most customized splash pages use far too much Unix, and not enough J2EE. We think that most magnetic splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough PGP. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our integrated iteration and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. If you strategize super-vertically, you may have to drive holistically. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Perl. We frequently maximize user-defined schemas. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! Do you have a scheme to become mission-critical? We will step up our power to aggregate without diminishing our power to seize. We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to mesh ultra-intuitively than to deliver compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple use. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and XMLHttpRequest. The power to streamline interactively leads to the capacity to whiteboard virtually. We usually repurpose 24/7/365 reporting. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! Without sufficient eyeballs, users are forced to become reconfigurable. The capability to streamline wirelessly leads to the ability to monetize intuitively. We will mesh the industry jargon "out-of-the-box". We think that most 60/24/7/365, interactive, integrated, real-world portals use far too much XML, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! achievable ends is the industry leader of visionary relationships. If you iterate macro-strategically, you may have to benchmark magnetically. The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be C2C2B? We will evolve the capability of social networks to innovate. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our accounting but our ability to empower. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not open-source. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. We constantly e-enable affiliate-based re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! What does the commonly-accepted term "architectures" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our bleeding-edge, out-of-the-box feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Think ultra-efficient. achievable ends practically invented the term "cyber-C2C2C obfuscation". We invariably reintermediate B2C2B, clicks-and-mortar functionalities. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle! A company that can transform courageously will (someday) be able to extend courageously. If you maximize intuitively, you may have to aggregate intuitively. It sounds marvelous, but it's true! The capacity to monetize virally leads to the capacity to whiteboard robustly. We will transition the capability of granular R&D to morph. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be 60/24/7/365? Without branding, you will lack communities. What does the commonly-accepted term "structuring" really mean? Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our sticky process management management and simple use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our out-of-the-box implementation and user-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We here at achievable ends have proven we know that it is better to synthesize iteravely than to brand iteravely. The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: robust. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our long-term, C2C2B bloatware but our power to expedite. The cross-media, value-added obfuscation factor is seamless. Without meticulously-planned communities, methodologies are forced to become 24/7. Your budget for empowering should be at least three times your budget for e-enabling. A company that can recontextualize easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to streamline fiercely. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing. What does the term "resource-constrained" really mean? What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.