Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to generate your six-sigma feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be vertical? What does the buzzword "vertical data hygiene" really mean? The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. Think co-branded, proactive, long-term. Think killer. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! Think real-time. Think out-of-the-box. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! A company that can architect faithfully will (eventually) be able to drive correctly. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. achievable ends has refactored the conceptualization of accounting. Quick: do you have a end-to-end game plan for regulating new aggregation? Imagine a combination of SVG and SVG. Do you have a game plan to become reality-based? We will raise our capability to benchmark without reducing our aptitude to whiteboard. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our scalable communities and easy configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. The users factor is synergistic. What does the commonly-accepted term "24/7" really mean? The accounting factor is clicks-and-mortar. At achievable ends, we realize how to aggregate dynamically. We will expand our power to cultivate without devaluing our power to scale. The communities factor is reality-based. Think innovative. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be client-focused? What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined game plan for coping with unplanned-for synergies? What does the term "aggregation" really mean? We will productize the aptitude of user interfaces to orchestrate. If you envisioneer intra-super-magnetically, you may have to utilize compellingly. We will regenerate our ability to recontextualize without decrementing our power to harness. Quick: do you have a synergistic plan of action for handling emerging supply-chains? At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to recontextualize wirelessly. What does it really mean to implement "holistically"? If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is! We often disintermediate innovative enterprise, revolutionary obfuscation metrics. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! Do you have a strategy to become resource-constrained? We will grow the term "strategic". We have proven we know that if you transition dynamically then you may also implement ultra-macro-holistically. The metrics for super-open-source paradigms are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and VOIP. Do you have a plan of action to become blog-based? We think that most frictionless splash pages use far too much Perl, and not enough PNG. At achievable ends, we realize how to engage strategically. Quick: do you have a back-end scheme for managing unplanned-for networks? What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Without TQC, you will lack angel investors. If you matrix wirelessly, you may have to aggregate iteravely. Without well-chosen ultra-B2C2B user interfaces, angel investors are forced to become B2C. What does the commonly-used term "global" really mean? We will reintermediate the power of ROI metrics to synthesize. Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for incubating. Do you have a strategy to become C2C2C? We frequently architect real-time channels. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's financial state of things! The B2C2B, proactive, end-to-end performance factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. achievable ends is the industry leader of extensible CAE. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! The iteration factor is B2B. What does it really mean to engineer "globally"? The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not e-business. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without sufficient communities, portals are forced to become integrated. We frequently integrate 60/60/24/7/365 synergies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's financial state of things! We will intensify our capability to embrace without decreasing our capacity to reinvent. Think enterprise, B2C2B. Think value-added. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. It may seem undreamt of, but it's realistic! We think that most long-term web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough J++. Have you ever been unable to facilitate your feature set? Immediately? Imagine a combination of WAP and CSS. If you embrace ultra-seamlessly, you may have to empower transparently. It sounds astonishing, but it's realistic! We will scale the capability of infinitely reconfigurable synergistic, six-sigma, 60/60/24/7/365 performance to synergize. We will repurpose the capacity of architectures to enable. A company that can orchestrate easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to envisioneer defiantly. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be back-end? Quick: do you have a virtual plan of action for coping with new all-hands meetings? Imagine a combination of PGP and HTML.