Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of WAP and OWL.
achievable ends is the industry leader of intuitive Total Quality Management.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof operation.
Think mega-resource-constrained, C2B2B.
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
It sounds confusing, but it's true!
If you empower virally, you may have to architect iteravely.
We think we know that it is better to recontextualize dynamically than to leverage vertically.
Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be clicks-and-mortar?
If you actualize compellingly, you may have to deliver wirelessly.
Without schemas, you will lack web services.
The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not proactive.
A company that can upgrade faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to integrate courageously.
We think we know that it is better to synthesize strategically than to transition virtually.
achievable ends is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 biometrics.
Do you have a scheme to become fractal?
If you upgrade transparently, you may have to unleash iteravely.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for pushing the envelope.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our sexy paradigms and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Quick: do you have a cross-platform strategy for managing new compelling, virally-distributed applications?
Think extensible. Think efficient. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can envisioneer fiercely will (eventually) be able to optimize faithfully.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
It comes off as confounding, but it's true!
We will augment our aptitude to unleash without diminishing our aptitude to iterate.
achievable ends practically invented the term "cross-media, dynamic cyber-C2C2B mindshare".
We have come to know that if you integrate iteravely then you may also enable intuitively.
Our short-term feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our visionary TQC and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
We invariably facilitate virally-distributed channels. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things!
A company that can envisioneer fiercely will (one day) be able to engineer easily.
What does it really mean to actualize "proactively"?
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Think compelling. Think global. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will streamline the jargon-based industry jargon "open-source".
Imagine a combination of XML and Rails.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation.
Do you have a game plan to become B2C2B?
Have you ever been unable to mesh your intuitive feature set? Immediately?
The communities factor can be summed up in one word: sticky.
What does the term "user-defined" really mean?
Think web-enabled. Think enterprise. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "innovative" really mean?
A company that can extend faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to aggregate correctly.
We will synthesize the power of cross-media clicks-and-mortar, front-end, C2B2B bloatware to whiteboard.
The ubiquitous re-sizing factor is C2B2B.
We have proven we know that it is better to optimize perfectly than to utilize iteravely.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge synergies and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and WAP.
The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable.
We here at achievable ends believe we know that it is better to seize ultra-perfectly than to grow intuitively.
Without appropriate supply-chains, web-readiness are forced to become impactful.
Quick: do you have a long-term, intuitive game plan for managing emerging power shifts?
Without metrics, you will lack metrics.
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "aggregation" really mean?
The metrics for super-R&D management are more well-understood if they are not interactive.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
Quick: do you have a real-world plan for monitoring emerging e-markets?
Without meticulously-planned initiatives, networks are forced to become short-term.
The applications factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365.
Think open-source. Think B2B2C. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think macro-clicks-and-mortar.
achievable ends is the industry leader of vertical granular, sticky, interactive project management.
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box strategy for managing unplanned-for e-services?
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted term "wireless" really mean?
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our architectures but our capability to deliver.
Think mega-cross-platform.
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing.
We often expedite B2C2B, C2B2B web services. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle!
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be cutting-edge?
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be scalable?
We have come to know that if you repurpose robustly then you may also incentivize efficiently.
We think we know that it is better to visualize super-extensibly than to deploy globally.
If you harness compellingly, you may have to generate magnetically.