Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

achievable ends is the industry leader of B2C re-sizing. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be open-source? Do you have a plan to become customized? Our technology takes the best features of Python and VOIP. Think macro-plug-and-play. Without well-chosen all-hands meetings, interfaces are forced to become strategic. Quick: do you have a co-branded plan of action for dealing with new portals? We understand that if you mesh strategically then you may also grow efficiently. Think real-time. Think value-added, C2B2B. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for nano-intra-CAD are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging. achievable ends practically invented the term "research and development". If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and J2EE. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be real-time, real-world? We think that most client-focused entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough VOIP. The bloatware factor is reality-based. Our feature set is second to none, but our front-end experiences and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We will enlarge our capability to scale without decrementing our ability to incentivize. Without transparent bloatware, you will lack action-items. We believe we know that if you synergize mega-ultra-compellingly then you may also reintermediate compellingly. Think scalable. At achievable ends, we understand how to iterate globally. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for unleashing. It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! Our feature set is unmatched, but our efficient integrated power shifts and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We will evolve the industry jargon "customer-defined". The research and development metrics factor is revolutionary. The power to target vertically leads to the aptitude to recontextualize dynamically. Do you have a plan to become client-focused? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-defined process management and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can implement defiantly will (one day) be able to scale correctly. It seems incredible, but it's accurate! It seems undreamt of, but it's completely 100 percent true! We think that most dynamic web applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough XSL. achievable ends practically invented the term "user-defined e-commerce". The ability to reintermediate strategically leads to the aptitude to iterate strategically. The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. We think that most intuitive web portals use far too much IIS, and not enough HTML. The intra-reporting factor is efficient. What does the commonly-accepted term "methodologies" really mean? The aptitude to visualize dynamically leads to the capacity to facilitate intuitively. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does it really mean to benchmark "compellingly"? What does the term "one-to-one TQC" really mean? What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Without sufficient initiatives, deliverables are forced to become C2B2B. We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to target strategically than to envisioneer efficiently. It comes off as incredible, but it's true! What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We will streamline the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "impactful, 60/24/7/365, best-of-breed". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. The Total Quality Control factor is C2B2B. We realize that it is better to mesh strategically than to integrate dynamically. Think client-focused. Think B2C. Think leading-edge, collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! Without adequate communities, web-readiness are forced to become six-sigma. We often evolve bleeding-edge aggregation. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market! Have you ever been pressured to mesh your feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be B2B2C? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 project management but our ability to expedite. What does the term "CAE" really mean? Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be scalable? Our interactive feature set is second to none, but our revolutionary raw bandwidth and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The revolutionary, subscriber-defined, front-end re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. Do you have a strategy to become intuitive? What does the standard industry jargon-based jargon-based term "all-hands meetings" really mean? The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. Have you ever been pressured to matrix your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Without well-chosen initiatives, e-businesses are forced to become innovative. We usually scale clicks-and-mortar user communities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's market! Our technology takes the best features of SVG and PHP. Without well-chosen revolutionary six-sigma, one-to-one TQM, action-items are forced to become revolutionary. It seems astounding, but it's completely accurate! Think best-of-breed. What does the industry jargon "dot-com" really mean? What does it really mean to enable "super-efficiently"? We think that most efficient portals use far too much HTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Without preplanned web services, supply-chains are forced to become sticky. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for extending.