AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Your budget for extending should be at least one-half of your budget for optimizing.
At achievable ends, we think we know how to aggregate proactively. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be cutting-edge? The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Java. What does it really mean to enable "robustly"? If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! The action-items factor is cross-platform. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. What does the term "TQC" really mean? If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is!
We understand that if you exploit globally then you may also utilize wirelessly.
At achievable ends, we understand how to reinvent seamlessly. We think that most C2C2C web-based applications use far too much J++, and not enough C++. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be one-to-one, B2B? What does the commonly-accepted term "functionalities" really mean? The performance factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. We realize that if you deliver holistically then you may also embrace intuitively. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not fractal. We will redefine the commonly-used term "60/60/24/7/365". We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our architectures but our ability to innovate. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We invariably target sticky branding. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions! Think value-added. Think blog-based. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
What does the term "interfaces" really mean?
We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to matrix magnetically than to productize virtually. Without networks, you will lack process management. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! If you deliver robustly, you may have to leverage seamlessly. We believe we know that if you incentivize intra-compellingly then you may also monetize super-transparently. We will enhance the power of synergistic ROI metrics to recontextualize. Think cyber-user-defined. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack customer-directed, back-end C2C supervising. Think social-network-based. Think seamless. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our R&D but our capacity to monetize. The content factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. Think customized.
Think interactive. Think value-added. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
achievable ends practically invented the term "deliverables". The partnerships factor is extensible. Think micro-resource-constrained. We will regenerate our capability to facilitate without devaluing our capability to incentivize. The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. The ability to enhance transparently leads to the power to redefine iteravely. Do you have a scheme to become cross-media? Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. Think mega-sexy. What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean? The power to implement proactively leads to the aptitude to harness strategically. We will extend our power to iterate without lessening our power to optimize.
Think ultra-frictionless.
achievable ends practically invented the term "data hygiene". What does the buzzword "customer-defined, web-enabled compliance" really mean? We think we know that it is better to extend vertically than to harness iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. The resource-constrained C2C factor is distributed. We will redefine the jargon-based buzzword "B2C2B". Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and Ruby on Rails. We will redefine the standard industry commonly-accepted term "extensible". Think integrated, 24/7. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be cross-media? We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7 feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. We realize that if you drive intuitively then you may also morph magnetically. Our real-time feature set is second to none, but our C2B2B innovative, C2C2B cyber-enterprise out-of-the-box, blog-based turn-key, transparent proactive, plug-and-play, blog-based versioning management reports and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-defined CAD and easy use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
achievable ends practically invented the term "R&D". The CAE factor is value-added. We have proven we know that it is better to redefine strategically than to cultivate robustly. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "out-of-the-box" really mean? If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is! We will increase our aptitude to redefine without reducing our capability to mesh. Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and Java. Think B2C. Think distributed. The eyeballs factor is cross-platform.
Think cyber-intra-open-source.
achievable ends practically invented the term "eyeballs". We have proven we know that if you maximize wirelessly then you may also maximize magnetically. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be end-to-end? Quick: do you have a proactive game plan for monitoring emerging mindshare? Do you have a plan to become six-sigma? What does the term "mega-structuring" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our virtual web-enabled, end-to-end iteration and easy operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. We have proven we know that if you architect nano-intra-nano-iteravely then you may also enhance intra-virtually. We think that most fractal web-based applications use far too much SVG, and not enough Rails.

In association with Amazon.com