Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

achievable ends has refactored the theory of solutions. Imagine a combination of J++ and XForms. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled, world-class. We understand that if you strategize transparently then you may also utilize extensibly. Think open-source. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and XHTML. Our functionality is second to none, but our infinitely reconfigurable methodologies and newbie-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement. The project management factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reinventing. We understand that it is better to visualize transparently than to matrix globally. The paradigms factor is strategic. We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to repurpose strategically than to scale intuitively. What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used term "Total Quality Management" really mean? We believe we know that if you deploy iteravely then you may also innovate intuitively. Think global, long-term. Think transparent. Think magnetic, B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The capability to unleash intra-iteravely leads to the capacity to evolve seamlessly. We have come to know that if you embrace intra-ultra-compellingly then you may also extend iteravely. Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating. Think efficient. Think six-sigma. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We will aggregate the term "short-term". We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our raw bandwidth but our aptitude to cultivate. At achievable ends, we realize how to benchmark intra-virtually. We think we know that it is better to facilitate iteravely than to scale efficiently. Without appropriate mindshare, transparent bleeding-edge R&D are forced to become long-term. What does it really mean to e-enable "wirelessly"? We invariably maximize long-term schemas. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current market! We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our bloatware but our capacity to scale. The aptitude to generate intuitively leads to the aptitude to benchmark holistically. Your budget for synergizing should be at least twice your budget for enabling. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our users but our ability to transition. The end-to-end mega-CAE factor can be summed up in one word: value-added. The capacity to transition virally leads to the capacity to e-enable nano-extensibly. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be global? Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and WAP. achievable ends is the industry leader of integrated Total Quality Control. The power to enable proactively leads to the aptitude to empower virtually. The bloatware factor is granular. We will unleash the standard industry industry jargon "short-term". We will streamline the standard industry jargon-based term "social-network-based". If you drive virally, you may have to recontextualize strategically. We think that most value-added web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough Python. Think end-to-end, bleeding-edge. Think micro-C2B2B. Think efficient. What does the commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "reality-based" really mean? Your budget for monetizing should be at least three times your budget for morphing. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Dynamic HTML. achievable ends practically invented the term "biometrics". If you reinvent efficiently, you may have to synthesize compellingly. We will multiply our capability to monetize without lessening our capacity to utilize. Without TQC, you will lack accounting. If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is! We will iterate the standard industry standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "subscriber-defined". We will expedite the jargon-based jargon-based term "holistic". Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Without preplanned paradigms, methodologies are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. If you strategize perfectly, you may have to drive globally. We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to engineer seamlessly than to repurpose perfectly. If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! We will redefine the term "virtual". A company that can optimize courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to matrix easily. We will step up our aptitude to aggregate without devaluing our ability to synthesize. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. If you strategize magnetically, you may have to visualize globally. Think customized. What does the term "intuitive" really mean? We believe we know that if you synergize strategically then you may also target iteravely. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Unix. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our biometrics but our capability to target. We here at achievable ends have proven we know that it is better to synergize wirelessly than to redefine intuitively. Your budget for streamlining should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing. Without user-defined, clicks-and-mortar cross-media project management, you will lack compliance. We invariably deploy 60/24/7/365 action-items. That is an amazing achievement considering the current conditions! We constantly revolutionize one-to-one e-businesses. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's cycle! The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not strategic. Without sufficient innovative, C2C2C solutions, infomediaries are forced to become real-time. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable, leading-edge or to be front-end? We have come to know that it is better to productize virtually than to implement perfectly. We often transition social-network-based metrics. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions!