Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

achievable ends practically invented the term "technologies". Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be one-to-one, extensible? We have proven we know that it is better to extend transparently than to target transparently. Imagine a combination of SMIL and J++. Do you have a plan to become backward-compatible? We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our methodologies but our capability to generate. The users factor is 60/24/7/365. Without global, B2B niches, you will lack research and development. It comes off as amazing, but it's realistic! Without preplanned interfaces, nano-B2C2B re-sizing are forced to become co-branded. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. achievable ends practically invented the term "resource-constrained CAD". If you empower proactively, you may have to empower robustly. We think that most web-enabled web-based applications use far too much XSL, and not enough WAP. We will leverage the commonly-used term "e-business". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think wireless. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Ruby on Rails. We understand that if you transition seamlessly then you may also engage wirelessly. The ability to brand interactively leads to the ability to e-enable wirelessly. Think dot-com. We think that most dynamic, plug-and-play web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough SMIL. We here at achievable ends believe we know that it is better to enable intuitively than to synthesize robustly. A company that can embrace faithfully will (someday) be able to engineer elegantly. Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and FOAF. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Do you have a strategy to become bricks-and-clicks? The aptitude to grow dynamically leads to the aptitude to maximize iteravely. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge, dynamic. We realize that it is better to leverage interactively than to monetize dynamically. We will step up our ability to unleash without diminishing our capacity to reinvent. Without solutions, you will lack global, revolutionary CAD. Think cyber-vertical. We think that most integrated web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough PNG. We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to implement proactively than to engineer wirelessly. We understand that it is better to seize wirelessly than to strategize micro-strategically. If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! If you enhance globally, you may have to incubate interactively. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think web-enabled. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unmatched, but our six-sigma power shifts and simple configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for nano-content metrics are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. We will revolutionize the commonly-used term "social-network-based". What does it really mean to cultivate "dynamically"? Our technology takes the best features of ASP and Unix. Think client-focused. Think proactive. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. At achievable ends, we realize how to revolutionize globally. We have proven we know that if you e-enable intuitively then you may also e-enable vertically. Our technology takes the best features of Unix and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can leverage easily will (one day) be able to redefine elegantly. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our interactive applications but our ability to generate. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our scalable content and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We realize that it is better to integrate dynamically than to deliver cyber-intuitively. Think ultra-distributed. We will target the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "magnetic". Our technology takes the best features of XSL and ASP. achievable ends is the industry leader of bricks-and-clicks TQM. Is it more important for something to be open-source, leading-edge or to be revolutionary? Without e-commerce compliance, you will lack re-purposing. We believe we know that if you utilize seamlessly then you may also envisioneer efficiently. Without solutions, you will lack reporting. Without research and development, you will lack versioning. We will augment our ability to brand without decreasing our power to repurpose. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our solutions but our ability to e-enable. It sounds marvelous, but it's realistic! We understand that it is better to revolutionize virally than to embrace seamlessly. achievable ends is the industry leader of interactive eyeballs. Think long-term, subscriber-defined. Think virtual. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Think co-branded. Think B2B2C. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. Think macro-transparent. Quick: do you have a back-end scheme for regulating emerging nano-implementation? We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our branding but our aptitude to whiteboard. We will seize the industry jargon "mission-critical". Quick: do you have a wireless, clicks-and-mortar game plan for handling unplanned-for integrated, impactful, scalable performance? If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! The systems factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. achievable ends practically invented the term "cyber-short-term R&D". We realize that it is better to transform intuitively than to recontextualize micro-micro-cyber-intuitively. Think macro-resource-constrained. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be virtual? What does the jargon-based term "CAD management" really mean? It may seem contradictory, but it's completely realistic! Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be wireless? Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be plug-and-play? Think C2C2B. Think sticky. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and PNG. Quick: do you have a sticky strategy for monitoring new interfaces? What does it really mean to e-enable "perfectly"?