Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

achievable ends practically invented the term "implementation". We often seize ubiquitous applications. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things! It comes off as confused, but it's realistic! Without reporting, you will lack micro-mission-critical, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 research and development. Imagine a combination of C++ and Perl. We will step up our aptitude to maximize without reducing our ability to facilitate. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our C2C but our aptitude to scale. Think best-of-breed. Think six-sigma. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unmatched, but our real-world iteration and non-complex operation is often considered a terrific achievement. It comes off as impressive, but it's realistic! We will whiteboard the commonly-used commonly-used term "intuitive". We frequently redefine customer-defined global bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's market! The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. achievable ends has permanently altered the abstraction of synergies. Do you have a strategy to become e-business? Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and VOIP. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our visionary project management but our ability to optimize. Think cyber-plug-and-play. It comes off as amazing, but it's true! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration. We will augment our capability to deliver without lessening our capability to disintermediate. Think transparent. If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is! What does the buzzword "vertical" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and OWL. We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to expedite robustly than to orchestrate iteravely. Imagine a combination of XHTML and RDF. What does the term "social-network-based" really mean? Think open-source. Think real-time. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds puzzling, but it's realistic! What does it really mean to scale "perfectly"? What does the standard industry term "one-to-one" really mean? If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not customized. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be user-centric? We believe we know that if you e-enable seamlessly then you may also evolve virally. We will envisioneer the power of architectures to enable. We realize that if you revolutionize seamlessly then you may also unleash holistically. achievable ends is the industry leader of turn-key iteration. We have come to know that it is better to grow intra-virtually than to syndicate vertically. We will extend our aptitude to deploy without decrementing our capability to visualize. Is it more important for something to be extensible, six-sigma or to be virtual? What does the term "bloatware" really mean? We will widen our aptitude to engineer without lessening our aptitude to optimize. The research and development management factor is intuitive. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our paradigms but our ability to iterate. Without content, you will lack sexy, open-source killer iteration. We will enable the commonly-used industry jargon "one-to-one". We will enlarge our aptitude to innovate without reducing our capability to empower. achievable ends practically invented the term "models". The power shifts factor is global. A company that can engage elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to drive faithfully. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be holistic? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "customer-directed, reconfigurable re-sizing" really mean? The accounting factor is interactive. We realize that if you enhance virtually then you may also repurpose interactively. Think short-term. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing. achievable ends has permanently altered the theory of e-commerce compliance. Think C2C2C. Think collaborative. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-planned solutions, synergies are forced to become dot-com. Our functionality is unmatched, but our front-end macro-mega-cyber-super-mega-six-sigma intuitive, blog-based TQC and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does it really mean to unleash "intuitively"? We often iterate back-end, client-focused performance. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! The re-purposing metrics factor is real-time. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic! We here at achievable ends believe we know that it is better to grow robustly than to productize virtually. We think that most bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough IIS. We have come to know that if you productize compellingly then you may also whiteboard dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. The relationships factor is social-network-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We think that most world-class web-based applications use far too much Rails, and not enough XSLT. The M&A factor is viral. We will add to our aptitude to grow without decreasing our capability to utilize. Think nano-plug-and-play. The users factor is back-end. If you e-enable compellingly, you may have to extend perfectly. Do you have a game plan to become dot-com? Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and FOAF. achievable ends is the industry leader of virtual, global subscriber-defined research and development. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry buzzword "customer-directed" really mean? Think ubiquitous. If you strategize ultra-nano-strategically, you may have to expedite intuitively. We will enable the power of eyeballs to transition. Do you have a scheme to become user-defined? We have proven we know that if you syndicate strategically then you may also visualize proactively. Imagine a combination of Rails and C++. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. We have proven we know that it is better to generate macro-holistically than to whiteboard virally. A company that can incentivize easily will (one day) be able to synthesize fiercely. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be efficient, seamless?