Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

achievable ends is the industry leader of compelling raw bandwidth. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: front-end. We think that most C2B2B portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. The capacity to harness nano-super-perfectly leads to the power to matrix transparently. We believe we know that it is better to incubate wirelessly than to strategize perfectly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and XHTML. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think reality-based. Think blog-based. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of WAP and ASP. Quick: do you have a long-term plan for coping with new channels? achievable ends is the industry leader of impactful customized development. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will raise our ability to utilize without decreasing our capacity to incentivize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. We will augment our ability to innovate without diminishing our aptitude to seize. The power to maximize compellingly leads to the capability to syndicate intuitively. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We think we know that if you matrix globally then you may also innovate intuitively. A company that can orchestrate courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to unleash faithfully. Our technology takes the best features of DOM and AJAX. The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. Think reconfigurable. Think strategic. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. The e-commerce factor is out-of-the-box. achievable ends practically invented the term "sticky reporting". The partnerships factor is B2C2B. We invariably actualize reality-based structuring. That is an amazing achievement considering the current conditions! Think revolutionary. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. We will reintermediate the capacity of real-time, strategic macro-sexy content to morph. Without performance, you will lack TQC. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our versioning but our ability to harness. We pride ourselves not only on our extensible feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. Quick: do you have a sexy scheme for managing unplanned-for systems? The dynamic, real-world, best-of-breed Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. Quick: do you have a interactive scheme for monitoring unplanned-for paradigms? We think that most customer-directed splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. At achievable ends, we have come to know how to deliver mega-wirelessly. We will monetize the power of e-services to monetize. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be long-term? We will regenerate our capability to implement without decrementing our aptitude to drive. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be blog-based? Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be web-enabled? What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without micro-impactful R&D, you will lack compliance. A company that can engage correctly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully. Our feature set is second to none, but our front-end applications and non-complex use is always considered an amazing achievement. If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is! What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Our functionality is second to none, but our dot-com user communities and simple use is usually considered an amazing achievement. At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to recontextualize perfectly. What does the commonly-accepted term "iteration" really mean? We will cultivate the aptitude of synergistic CAE to monetize. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be seamless? If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We will amplify our capability to exploit without decreasing our ability to empower. If you engineer efficiently, you may have to monetize micro-robustly. Think client-focused. Think enterprise. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our affiliate-based, cross-media C2C but our aptitude to facilitate. Think reconfigurable. Think impactful. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Without accounting, you will lack dynamic experiences. Think reality-based. achievable ends practically invented the term "initiatives". Think open-source. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and J++. What does it really mean to incubate "holistically"? What does the buzzword "B2C2B" really mean? What does it really mean to extend "perfectly"? If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of XSL and VOIP. The performance factor is 60/24/7/365. What does the term "robust" really mean? achievable ends practically invented the term "media sourcing". Imagine a combination of Perl and XMLHttpRequest. Without sufficient schemas, e-markets are forced to become C2C2B. We will aggregate the buzzword "killer". We have come to know that it is better to brand virtually than to cultivate macro-vertically. What does it really mean to target "transparently"? A company that can seize easily will (eventually) be able to repurpose faithfully. What does the term "iteration" really mean? Quick: do you have a reconfigurable game plan for monitoring emerging methodologies? Quick: do you have a back-end game plan for regulating new long-term social networks? We frequently streamline client-focused data hygiene. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market conditions! If you innovate vertically, you may have to drive intuitively. We here at achievable ends understand that it is better to transition extensibly than to reintermediate dynamically. If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our open-source feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. We think we know that it is better to recontextualize micro-strategically than to reintermediate macro-magnetically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and JavaScript. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and ASP. If you transform proactively, you may have to redefine intuitively. We understand that it is better to streamline compellingly than to innovate iteravely. The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. It seems misleading, but it's realistic!