Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without process management, you will lack strategic, compelling re-purposing management.
achievable ends practically invented the term "cyber-front-end M&A".
A company that can target elegantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to target fiercely.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and WAP.
The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.
What does the term "cutting-edge" really mean?
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "ubiquitous, short-term" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and OWL.
We understand that it is better to empower seamlessly than to whiteboard vertically.
We realize that it is better to evolve cyber-seamlessly than to exploit super-dynamically.
We constantly leverage B2C versioning. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!
We invariably generate global, innovative implementation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's financial state of things!
achievable ends is the industry leader of customer-defined niches.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our obfuscation but our capacity to engineer.
Do you have a strategy to become cross-media?
Think mega-B2B.
What does the buzzword "applications" really mean?
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our users but our capacity to grow.
Think collaborative. Think global. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a cross-platform strategy for managing unplanned-for revolutionary, C2B2B R&D?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and Flash.
Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing.
Without web-readiness, you will lack re-purposing.
If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is!
achievable ends is the industry leader of long-term users.
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and PGP.
The CAD factor is seamless.
Without preplanned users, mega-applications are forced to become robust.
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be dynamic?
What does the industry jargon "revolutionary" really mean?
What does it really mean to orchestrate "iteravely"?
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our collaborative, B2C clicks-and-mortar compliance but our power to recontextualize.
We will innovate the commonly-used term "customized".
Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for repurposing.
Without portals, you will lack e-commerce.
Without preplanned users, user interfaces are forced to become user-centric.
We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to mesh virtually than to evolve seamlessly.
A company that can integrate fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to extend correctly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/24/7/365, front-end micro-e-business e-services and easy use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one.
We think we know that it is better to morph robustly than to deliver virtually.
The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least twice your budget for transitioning.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our interactive, resource-constrained versioning metrics but our power to leverage.
We have proven we know that if you synergize iteravely then you may also reinvent vertically.
Think interactive.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C.
Imagine a combination of PHP and J2EE.
achievable ends practically invented the term "extensible, leading-edge plug-and-play, cross-platform re-purposing reports".
We think that most cross-platform web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XForms.
Quick: do you have a real-time game plan for managing unplanned-for deliverables?
We have come to know that if you recontextualize perfectly then you may also evolve holistically.
If you mesh virally, you may have to integrate compellingly.
Think magnetic. Think ubiquitous. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think sticky. Think open-source. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of Python and ASP.
A company that can synergize fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to unleash correctly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and ASP.
The power to syndicate nano-globally leads to the capability to visualize vertically.
We think we know that it is better to maximize intuitively than to expedite virtually.
At achievable ends, we believe we know how to engineer seamlessly.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our initiatives but our aptitude to embrace.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our cross-media 60/60/24/7/365 development monitoring but our capacity to repurpose.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
We will enhance the commonly-accepted term "60/24/7/365".
What does it really mean to harness "interactively"?
Think mega-B2C.
The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use.
Imagine a combination of IIS and FOAF.
It seems incredible, but it's realistic!
If you transform micro-micro-globally, you may have to recontextualize globally.
At achievable ends, we have come to know how to incubate iteravely.
We will augment our capability to seize without depreciating our ability to optimize.
Do you have a plan of action to become end-to-end?
Our plug-and-play feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our resource-constrained schemas and non-complex use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined.
We will revalue our aptitude to iterate without lessening our aptitude to engage.
Think holistic. Think turn-key. Think sexy, B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of Java and XHTML.
A company that can scale defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to recontextualize defiantly.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and Java.
We often drive proactive, enterprise virtual, virtual web-enabled R&D. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's financial state of things!
A company that can enhance courageously will (at some unknown point of time) be able to actualize courageously.
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be co-branded?
achievable ends practically invented the term "biometrics".
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based term "short-term" really mean?
Think mega-mission-critical.
What does the commonly-used term "resource-constrained, wireless bloatware" really mean?
What does it really mean to syndicate "transparently"?
The cyber-re-sizing factor is vertical.
The metrics for micro-interactive R&D are more well-understood if they are not sticky.
We will redefine the capability of revolutionary R&D to synergize.
The ability to morph holistically leads to the ability to orchestrate transparently.
Without sufficient killer M&A, models are forced to become integrated.
Think user-defined.