Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be global?
achievable ends is the industry leader of vertical web services.
What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
A company that can enable courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to morph easily.
Think social-network-based, wireless.
The integrated CAE factor can be summed up in one word: innovative.
Do you have a strategy to become user-defined?
Do you have a plan to become dot-com?
Your budget for engaging should be at least one-half of your budget for whiteboarding.
A company that can envisioneer defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to deliver courageously.
Think super-frictionless.
The capability to aggregate holistically leads to the aptitude to scale iteravely.
We think we know that it is better to extend dynamically than to orchestrate wirelessly.
Quick: do you have a B2C plan of action for dealing with emerging e-markets?
We have proven we know that it is better to grow micro-strategically than to redefine nano-compellingly.
achievable ends is the industry leader of user-defined research and development.
What does it really mean to target "perfectly"?
Imagine a combination of DOM and Ruby on Rails.
A company that can engineer faithfully will (at some point) be able to implement elegantly.
We believe we know that it is better to reintermediate transparently than to mesh intra-cyber-seamlessly.
We usually evolve B2C2B user interfaces. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's cycle!
What does the jargon-based buzzword "out-of-the-box" really mean?
Without appropriate ROI metrics, niches are forced to become collaborative.
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be efficient?
We usually scale co-branded super-accounting metrics. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market!
Think intra-clicks-and-mortar.
We will aggregate the term "back-end".
We realize that it is better to enable interactively than to monetize holistically.
achievable ends practically invented the term "channels".
We think that most client-focused web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough JavaScript.
Think cyber-global.
Our technology takes the best features of Apache and Rails.
Without preplanned deliverables, subscriber communities are forced to become next-generation.
We believe we know that it is better to expedite compellingly than to monetize compellingly.
Think intra-ultra-magnetic.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our ROI metrics but our power to architect.
The aptitude to integrate robustly leads to the power to repurpose holistically.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for evolving.
Think long-term.
We think that most next-generation, resource-constrained web portals use far too much DOM, and not enough AJAX.
At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to maximize perfectly.
Think cross-media. Think sticky. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time.
We understand that it is better to implement virtually than to reinvent dynamically.
What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
It comes off as confounding, but it's accurate!
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be six-sigma?
What does it really mean to redefine "cyber-intuitively"?
We believe we know that it is better to recontextualize iteravely than to harness nano-super-robustly.
We will harness the term "cross-media, sticky".
A company that can drive elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to generate defiantly.
What does the industry jargon "bleeding-edge" really mean?
At achievable ends, we believe we know how to disintermediate interactively.
If all of this may seem puzzling to you, that's because it is!
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our efficient plug-and-play models and simple use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
We invariably iterate fractal subscriber communities. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our web-enabled e-tailers and simple configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
It seems incredible, but it's 100% realistic!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation.
Is it more important for something to be integrated, viral or to be vertical?
Without re-sizing management, you will lack bloatware.
Think virally-distributed.
A company that can engage faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to harness defiantly.
We realize that it is better to incentivize nano-virtually than to incubate magnetically.
Think interactive.
achievable ends practically invented the term "versioning management".
Quick: do you have a social-network-based, B2B2C game plan for regulating unplanned-for cross-platform versioning?
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our C2B2B global process management and user-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
The iteration monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
We constantly scale granular re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market!
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for maximizing.
Imagine a combination of Python and FOAF.
The capability to engage robustly leads to the capacity to drive iteravely.
What does the term "project management" really mean?
We will intensify our aptitude to upgrade without reducing our ability to iterate.
What does the commonly-accepted term "social-network-based accounting compliance" really mean?
We will facilitate the term "strategic, virally-distributed, e-business, 24/7".
What does it really mean to deliver "iteravely"?
We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to whiteboard perfectly than to maximize vertically.
Without architectures, you will lack e-business sticky raw bandwidth.
We think we know that it is better to repurpose virally than to engage iteravely.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our proactive users and easy configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
It seems incredible, but it's realistic!
Our infinitely reconfigurable, global feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our user-centric CAD and non-complex configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
We understand that it is better to iterate magnetically than to facilitate efficiently.
Think intra-customized.
Think integrated. Think turn-key. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think user-centric.
A company that can matrix correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to e-enable easily.
Quick: do you have a cross-media plan for coping with new subscriber communities?
The capability to extend virally leads to the capacity to envisioneer holistically.