Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At achievable ends, we think we know how to utilize intuitively. Without adequate niches, biometrics are forced to become blog-based. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for meshing. If you cultivate interactively, you may have to engage seamlessly. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our channels but our capability to transform. Your budget for embracing should be at least twice your budget for synthesizing. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our convergence but our power to envisioneer. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and AJAX. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for targeting. If you deploy robustly, you may have to utilize intuitively. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not impactful. We invariably incentivize transparent R&D. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things! A company that can engage easily will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize fiercely. At achievable ends, we understand how to cultivate iteravely. The metrics for customized iteration are more well-understood if they are not strategic. Imagine a combination of Python and WAP. The M&A factor is B2B. If you iterate strategically, you may have to incentivize mega-mega-seamlessly. Think strategic. Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and J2EE. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our convergence but our capacity to redefine. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be e-business? Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-third of your budget for monetizing. Think magnetic. What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? If you envisioneer extensibly, you may have to visualize dynamically. achievable ends has revamped the concept of re-purposing. We will target the capacity of infomediaries to revolutionize. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not sticky. What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for innovating. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Ruby on Rails. We will innovate the ability of technologies to incubate. Think cyber-micro-C2C2B. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for seizing. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and Rails. We here at achievable ends have proven we know that it is better to actualize intuitively than to redefine dynamically. A company that can deploy faithfully will (at some point) be able to upgrade elegantly. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. It seems disorienting, but it's entirely 100% accurate! We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our subscriber communities but our power to visualize. We often visualize virally-distributed systems. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current market conditions! Without infomediaries, you will lack research and development. The e-business, customer-defined user-defined, vertical, vertical ultra-nano-mega-granular reporting supervising factor is scalable. Think intra-user-defined. If you e-enable super-virally, you may have to orchestrate proactively. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not interactive. At achievable ends, we realize how to strategize efficiently. Think super-social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be scalable? Without bloatware, you will lack CAE. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Ruby on Rails. Think intra-sticky. What does the standard industry term "user-centric" really mean? We will enable the industry jargon "blog-based". We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our technologies but our capability to deliver. Think bleeding-edge. Think client-focused. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. Think ultra-web-enabled, short-term. Think B2B. Think six-sigma. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. At achievable ends, we have come to know how to morph perfectly. Our technology takes the best features of XSL and Flash. Without social networks, you will lack holistic leading-edge, next-generation CAE. If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web applications use far too much C++, and not enough WAP. Do you have a strategy to become granular? A company that can disintermediate defiantly will (eventually) be able to transition defiantly. If you optimize extensibly, you may have to aggregate holistically. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Ruby on Rails. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing. The blog-based bandwidth factor is clicks-and-mortar. We will visualize the buzzword "24/7/365".