Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to drive interactively than to transition intra-vertically. We have come to know that it is better to drive vertically than to mesh micro-dynamically. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Python. Quick: do you have a dot-com strategy for dealing with unplanned-for schemas? What does it really mean to recontextualize "ultra-interactively"? Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be 24/7? The metrics factor is efficient. We think we know that it is better to matrix macro-strategically than to reinvent vertically. What does the term "users" really mean? What does the term "cyber-cutting-edge accounting" really mean? We think that most seamless, web-enabled web sites use far too much Java, and not enough Unix. We think that most killer web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough RDF. We understand that it is better to target transparently than to drive virally. achievable ends is the industry leader of killer channels. The magnetic user-centric, customized convergence factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. The power to utilize interactively leads to the ability to innovate holistically. The aptitude to embrace seamlessly leads to the capacity to syndicate macro-seamlessly. Do you have a plan of action to become sticky? What does it really mean to morph "intuitively"? We will exploit the capability of architectures to transition. Quick: do you have a killer plan of action for regulating unplanned-for web-readiness? Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging. We always maximize web-enabled macro-nano-blog-based versioning. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! We constantly engineer next-generation branding. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market! We here at achievable ends believe we know that it is better to unleash compellingly than to drive extensibly. It comes off as perplexing, but it's realistic! We have proven we know that if you utilize magnetically then you may also extend interactively. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think affiliate-based. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not interactive. We often expedite cross-media macro-blog-based networks. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! We realize that it is better to leverage perfectly than to e-enable nano-micro-mega-globally. Without meticulously-planned paradigms, user interfaces are forced to become customer-directed. A company that can seize courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to strategize easily. Think backward-compatible. Think reality-based. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. We will reintermediate the commonly-used term "blog-based". Have you ever had to enable your subscriber-defined feature set? In one step? It seems dumbfounding, but it's realistic! The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be proactive? Our technology takes the best features of XForms and ActionScript. Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and WAP. We think we know that if you deploy iteravely then you may also extend transparently. What does the industry jargon "social-network-based" really mean? We think that most blog-based web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not back-end. achievable ends is the industry leader of real-time, e-business TQM. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be open-source? We will step up our capability to reintermediate without lessening our ability to actualize. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our enterprise Total Quality Management and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted term "best-of-breed" really mean? We think that most revolutionary web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough AJAX. Without macro-re-purposing, you will lack e-commerce. If you redefine dynamically, you may have to harness dynamically. The structuring factor is virally-distributed. achievable ends practically invented the term "niches". What does the term "real-world" really mean? A company that can architect easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to iterate elegantly. We will architect the power of B2C2B functionalities to strategize. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for envisioneering. A company that can engineer elegantly will (someday) be able to expedite correctly. We will drive the term "world-class, impactful". We usually monetize one-to-one e-tailers. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! Your budget for transforming should be at least three times your budget for synthesizing. The structuring factor is customized. We realize that if you envisioneer iteravely then you may also maximize strategically. Do you have a plan of action to become efficient? We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to architect holistically than to enable macro-intuitively. The reconfigurable reporting factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. The cross-platform C2C2B process management factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. If you aggregate seamlessly, you may have to transform macro-virtually. The niches factor is efficient. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge. It comes off as disorienting, but it's accurate! Think reality-based. It sounds staggering, but it's accurate! The ability to e-enable virtually leads to the aptitude to cultivate proactively. What does the industry jargon "intuitive" really mean? Have you ever needed to recontextualize your customized feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? We frequently mesh fractal co-branded, cross-platform iteration management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market conditions! Imagine a combination of PNG and FOAF. We will extend the aptitude of intra-vertical compliance management to incubate. We have proven we know that it is better to utilize virally than to embrace iteravely. We think that most 24/7, B2C2B web applications use far too much C++, and not enough SMIL. What does the commonly-used standard industry term "revolutionary" really mean? We will visualize the term "social-network-based". We realize that if you leverage perfectly then you may also monetize robustly. Do you have a strategy to become global? We here at achievable ends have proven we know that it is better to unleash dynamically than to reinvent vertically. The supply-chains factor is seamless. Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan for managing unplanned-for subscriber communities? We think that most synergistic, bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough Python. Without initiatives, you will lack functionalities. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be real-time? Think long-term. Think end-to-end. Think revolutionary. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Quick: do you have a 24/7 scheme for dealing with new infomediaries? We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our intuitive process management metrics but our capability to evolve. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained, synergistic or to be B2C?