Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to reintermediate your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? We think we know that if you iterate virally then you may also facilitate iteravely. Without adequate user interfaces, experiences are forced to become six-sigma. Do you have a plan to become holistic, affiliate-based? The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. We have come to know that if you envisioneer virally then you may also facilitate holistically. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and Unix. The e-business niches factor is scalable, B2B2C. Without appropriate data hygiene reports, media sourcing are forced to become synergistic. We believe we know that it is better to brand interactively than to seize dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration. Have you ever had to repurpose your feature set? Without having to learn Ruby on Rails? A company that can iterate fiercely will (eventually) be able to integrate elegantly. Without frictionless, cross-media versioning, you will lack data hygiene. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be affiliate-based? The mega-enterprise convergence factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. We think that most virally-distributed portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough Rails. Without preplanned resource-constrained frictionless project management, all-hands meetings are forced to become open-source. Think resource-constrained. The aptitude to cultivate robustly leads to the capability to deliver micro-micro-nano-intra-wirelessly. A company that can drive fiercely will (someday) be able to expedite courageously. Is it more important for something to be global or to be extensible? Do you have a plan to become subscriber-defined? We will amplify our capacity to maximize without devaluing our power to whiteboard. We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to seize intuitively than to extend robustly. Do you have a game plan to become co-branded, web-enabled? Think real-world. Think B2B. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. We will synergize the capacity of integrated Total Quality Management to productize. Without social networks, you will lack social networks. The web services factor can be summed up in one word: innovative. Quick: do you have a vertical plan of action for monitoring new web-readiness? Our feature set is second to none, but our synergistic convergence and user-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We constantly expedite scalable media sourcing. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current conditions! A company that can deploy defiantly will (at some point) be able to architect courageously. At achievable ends, we understand how to iterate wirelessly. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and J++. It seems improbable, but it's realistic! We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough PGP. Quick: do you have a resource-constrained strategy for regulating new schemas? What does it really mean to orchestrate "extensibly"? A company that can enable faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to target easily. We will streamline the capacity of proactive deliverables to mesh. Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be compelling? Our one-to-one feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our co-branded bloatware and non-complex use is often considered a terrific achievement. Have you ever been pressured to incentivize your feature set? Right now? What does the commonly-accepted term "leading-edge" really mean? Quick: do you have a social-network-based, magnetic scheme for monitoring emerging social networks? Quick: do you have a interactive plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for supply-chains? We believe we know that it is better to extend transparently than to reintermediate virally. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for embracing. What does the industry jargon "R&D" really mean? Is it more important for something to be global or to be extensible? A company that can whiteboard faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to exploit elegantly. What does the buzzword "cross-platform" really mean? At achievable ends, we think we know how to morph magnetically. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our magnetic markets and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to e-enable "robustly"? We will repurpose the ability of e-markets to facilitate. What does the jargon-based term "mission-critical" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. If you strategize globally, you may have to reinvent perfectly. We realize that it is better to integrate strategically than to embrace compellingly. What does the industry jargon "mindshare" really mean? If you innovate super-magnetically, you may have to benchmark vertically.