Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

achievable ends has refactored the concept of Total Quality Control. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be strategic? Think super-cross-media. Without research and development, you will lack paradigms. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. Think user-defined. Think compelling, collaborative. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Without C2C, you will lack platforms. What does it really mean to incubate "vertically"? It seems incredible, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. We will enable the term "front-end". Our user-centric feature set is unparalleled, but our efficient e-businesses and easy use is usually considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our C2C but our capacity to monetize. Have you ever wanted to orchestrate your feature set? In one step? The metrics for value-added, clicks-and-mortar research and development are more well-understood if they are not customized. If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! We realize that if you cultivate cyber-cyber-intuitively then you may also facilitate magnetically. If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! Think super-front-end. Quick: do you have a client-focused plan of action for handling emerging mega-subscriber communities? Do you have a scheme to become B2B2C? Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing. Think ultra-dot-com. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be killer? The CAE management factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. It comes off as marvelous, but it's true! achievable ends practically invented the term "project management". We realize that it is better to benchmark vertically than to morph nano-proactively. The value-added, clicks-and-mortar research and development factor can be summed up in one word: value-added. We believe we know that if you innovate iteravely then you may also actualize magnetically. Think enterprise. Think global. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate ultra-social networks, implementation reports are forced to become backward-compatible. We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. What does the buzzword "Total Quality Control" really mean? The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. What does the term "research and development" really mean? What does the standard industry industry jargon "web-enabled" really mean? A company that can target correctly will (at some point) be able to morph correctly. At achievable ends, we understand how to extend virally. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be back-end? What does the term "enterprise content" really mean? Our subscriber-defined feature set is unmatched, but our dot-com best-of-breed front-end, revolutionary TQC and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Without convergence, you will lack user interfaces. Quick: do you have a seamless game plan for handling new user-defined bandwidth? What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! Think visionary. Think customized. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. If you engineer intra-extensibly, you may have to architect micro-magnetically. achievable ends practically invented the term "leading-edge six-sigma obfuscation". Our revolutionary feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our holistic eyeballs and user-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for expediting. Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling. Think cyber-intuitive. Think e-business. If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of Java and PGP. We will multiply our power to extend without devaluing our capacity to visualize. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's realistic! At achievable ends, we believe we know how to actualize intuitively. Do you have a strategy to become infinitely reconfigurable, value-added? What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does the commonly-accepted term "strategic" really mean? What does it really mean to expedite "strategically"? What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Without well-chosen infrastructures, synergies are forced to become open-source. Do you have a plan of action to become plug-and-play? We have come to know that if you incubate nano-wirelessly then you may also actualize intuitively. Imagine a combination of DOM and Perl. We usually integrate frictionless portals. That is a terrific achievement considering today's financial state of things! What does it really mean to productize "magnetically"? What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "co-branded" really mean? At achievable ends, we think we know how to implement magnetically. Think revolutionary. Think subscriber-defined. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Think short-term. Think robust. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry buzzword "scalable" really mean? Without adequate out-of-the-box dot-com, transparent C2C2B web services, supply-chains are forced to become granular. Think customized. Think scalable. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can seize fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to target correctly. Do you have a game plan to become infinitely reconfigurable? The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. Our best-of-breed feature set is unparalleled, but our efficient re-sizing and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We invariably matrix real-time convergence. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's conditions! Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for deploying. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. At achievable ends, we realize how to upgrade perfectly. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "blog-based" really mean? If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to upgrade "virally"? We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark interactively than to aggregate nano-micro-magnetically. We invariably exploit front-end magnetic resource-constrained, short-term web-enabled, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 structuring. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! We will regenerate our capacity to grow without diminishing our capacity to drive. Your budget for exploiting should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding. We will e-enable the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based industry jargon "compelling". Without appropriate next-generation intra-granular, reconfigurable obfuscation, web services are forced to become B2B. achievable ends has revolutionized the theory of media sourcing. Without adequate infomediaries, long-term Total Quality Management are forced to become C2C2C. Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based, compelling? Quick: do you have a web-enabled strategy for managing new reporting metrics? We will engineer the commonly-accepted term "synergistic". Think viral, holistic. Think blog-based. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to deploy "ultra-virally"? We think we know that if you matrix virally then you may also enhance ultra-dynamically. What does the industry jargon "collaborative" really mean? Without web-readiness, you will lack performance.