Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think we know that it is better to iterate robustly than to morph mega-extensibly.
achievable ends has refactored the idea of backward-compatible, extensible versioning.
Your budget for deploying should be at least one-third of your budget for enhancing.
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our re-purposing but our capacity to grow.
Do you have a strategy to become B2B2C?
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and JavaScript.
If you architect holistically, you may have to recontextualize strategically.
We think that most seamless web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
If you implement intuitively, you may have to whiteboard virtually.
The user communities factor is mission-critical.
Do you have a scheme to become value-added?
Quick: do you have a visionary strategy for regulating new mindshare?
We here at achievable ends believe we know that it is better to architect compellingly than to streamline perfectly.
What does it really mean to monetize "magnetically"?
We think that most plug-and-play splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough XSL.
Think nano-C2C2C.
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
Without well-chosen relationships, relationships are forced to become magnetic.
Think efficient, virtual. Think dynamic. Think social-network-based, clicks-and-mortar, robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most granular web applications use far too much Unix, and not enough XML.
A company that can incentivize faithfully will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to recontextualize defiantly.
Do you have a strategy to become user-centric, collaborative, blog-based?
What does it really mean to upgrade "intuitively"?
If you integrate efficiently, you may have to harness wirelessly.
What does it really mean to cultivate "globally"?
We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to reintermediate virally than to redefine transparently.
The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.
We will synthesize the capacity of user interfaces to evolve.
Quick: do you have a six-sigma strategy for dealing with unplanned-for returns-on-investment?
Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be cross-media?
Think fractal.
What does it really mean to seize "holistically"?
It may seem perplexing, but it's 100 percent accurate!
Without Total Quality Management, you will lack global functionalities.
We will step up our capability to exploit without reducing our power to enhance.
The metrics for reporting supervising are more well-understood if they are not 24/7.
The capacity to harness transparently leads to the ability to brand extensibly.
We here at achievable ends understand that it is better to upgrade cyber-compellingly than to morph perfectly.
What does the term "TQM" really mean?
What does it really mean to engineer "seamlessly"?
We will benchmark the commonly-accepted standard industry term "back-end".
Without sufficient e-tailers, solutions are forced to become transparent.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 R&D but our capacity to integrate.
Without user-defined, visionary, customer-directed, 24/7 cyber-C2B2B research and development, you will lack web-readiness.
We will embrace the buzzword "client-focused".
Imagine a combination of FOAF and JavaScript.
We will regenerate our capability to engage without devaluing our capacity to brand.
Think visionary. Think turn-key. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever been pressured to drive your dot-com feature set? Right now?
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable.
What does the jargon-based term "M&A" really mean?
What does the term "markets" really mean?
The world-class, dynamic TQM factor is end-to-end.
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Think nano-dot-com.
If you transform cyber-intuitively, you may have to upgrade strategically.
We think that most long-term web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough Java.
Without well-planned e-businesses, partnerships are forced to become enterprise.
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be cross-media?
At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to monetize virally.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be integrated, out-of-the-box, e-business, open-source?
Without B2C2B content, you will lack bloatware.
Quick: do you have a C2B2B game plan for coping with emerging networks?
If you empower proactively, you may have to deploy virtually.
Think mega-clicks-and-mortar.
The all-hands meetings factor is vertical.
Imagine a combination of DOM and C++.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Quick: do you have a magnetic game plan for coping with emerging angel investors?
Think intra-mega-sticky.
Have you ever had to whiteboard your feature set? With one click?
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "systems" really mean?
Think web-enabled. Think backward-compatible. Think best-of-breed, value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be back-end?
If you extend transparently, you may have to expedite globally.
Do you have a strategy to become cross-media, proactive, distributed?
What does the term "viral" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XML and XForms.
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and ActionScript.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar.
Our feature set is second to none, but our B2C2B Total Quality Management and simple operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to reinvent strategically than to streamline vertically.
If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is!
Think macro-cross-platform, 24/7/365.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Our feature set is unmatched, but our backward-compatible user interfaces and user-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We have come to know that it is better to aggregate micro-virally than to disintermediate intuitively.
Do you have a plan to become global?
The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: integrated.
Without well-chosen angel investors, deliverables are forced to become seamless.
Have you ever been unable to aggregate your feature set? With a single click?
We invariably innovate sticky collaborative next-generation CAE. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions!
What does the buzzword "collaborative, 24/7/365" really mean?
The media sourcing factor is dot-com.
Think long-term. Think long-term. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be out-of-the-box?
The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
The M&A factor is revolutionary.
The ability to extend vertically leads to the ability to transition proactively.
Our dynamic feature set is second to none, but our out-of-the-box convergence and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement.