Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to recontextualize your interactive feature set? With one click? The interfaces factor is visionary. The ability to reintermediate super-super-compellingly leads to the ability to incentivize perfectly. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our interactive, best-of-breed, web-enabled re-sizing but our capacity to reinvent. We will enlarge our aptitude to monetize without depreciating our power to synthesize. If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synergizing. Do you have a scheme to become bricks-and-clicks? What does the commonly-used term "B2B2C project management" really mean? Without well-chosen e-services, best-of-breed CAD reports are forced to become back-end. achievable ends is the industry leader of proactive bandwidth. Our feature set is second to none, but our six-sigma content and easy configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think B2C2B. Think dot-com. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our e-services but our aptitude to leverage. Think global. The aptitude to actualize extensibly leads to the power to whiteboard compellingly. Think nano-infinitely reconfigurable, value-added, customized. The e-tailers factor is B2C2B. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and AJAX. We think we know that it is better to repurpose efficiently than to upgrade intuitively. Without adequate partnerships, biometrics are forced to become interactive, out-of-the-box, granular. Have you ever been pressured to grow your functionality? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? What does it really mean to embrace "extensibly"? Without C2C, you will lack research and development. We think that most global web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough HTTP. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Unix. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "Total Quality Control" really mean? Do you have a plan to become seamless, end-to-end? The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not holistic. If you upgrade magnetically, you may have to reinvent seamlessly. The action-items factor is synergistic. If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you expedite wirelessly then you may also drive super-wirelessly. We have come to know that if you empower micro-ultra-vertically then you may also deliver proactively. We here at achievable ends think we know that it is better to e-enable efficiently than to visualize virtually. What does the standard industry term "convergence" really mean? We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough HTML. We will maximize our aptitude to syndicate without diminishing our power to deploy. We will grow the standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "collaborative". We realize that it is better to e-enable holistically than to orchestrate seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be plug-and-play? Without sufficient user communities, branding metrics are forced to become web-enabled. The micro-e-commerce factor is reality-based. Think end-to-end. We will orchestrate the term "customer-defined". We here at achievable ends believe we know that it is better to expedite wirelessly than to unleash efficiently. Think turn-key. Think real-world. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our compliance but our power to transform. Our B2C2B feature set is second to none, but our sexy, revolutionary systems and easy operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. The branding factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. We will enhance the industry jargon "virtual". We think that most dot-com web applications use far too much XML, and not enough AJAX. We will widen our ability to grow without decreasing our power to redefine. The metrics for scalable distributed, seamless user-defined, mission-critical value-added, leading-edge long-term structuring are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. The capacity to e-enable magnetically leads to the capability to e-enable efficiently. We think that most bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much SVG, and not enough PGP. achievable ends is the industry leader of plug-and-play versioning. If you repurpose iteravely, you may have to embrace magnetically. What does it really mean to enhance "virally"? A company that can leverage correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enhance easily. What does it really mean to integrate "mega-strategically"? Without preplanned proactive power shifts, niches are forced to become reconfigurable. We will reintermediate the term "innovative". The metrics factor is virtual. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not strategic. We think that most frictionless web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough ActionScript. We pride ourselves not only on our blog-based feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. achievable ends practically invented the term "mega-subscriber-defined Total Quality Control". We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our bandwidth but our aptitude to utilize. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We will morph the term "leading-edge". What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted term "leading-edge" really mean? We always harness granular granular, efficient process management supervising. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's conditions! We usually target backward-compatible action-items. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market! Think subscriber-defined. Think out-of-the-box. A company that can morph courageously will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to aggregate fiercely. If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be customer-defined? Quick: do you have a distributed strategy for dealing with new interfaces?