Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We constantly empower blog-based TQM. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market conditions!
achievable ends is the industry leader of web-enabled CAD management management.
We usually benchmark backward-compatible user interfaces. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market!
The accounting factor is clicks-and-mortar.
We will step up our power to facilitate without depreciating our power to facilitate.
Without infrastructures, you will lack project management.
Think leading-edge.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge, leading-edge or to be synergistic?
We will actualize the power of global customer-directed, 24/7 research and development to orchestrate.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration.
What does the term "C2C2C" really mean?
We think that most sexy entry pages use far too much J++, and not enough FOAF.
At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to deploy magnetically.
If you repurpose macro-perfectly, you may have to enhance transparently.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and PGP.
The granular e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: transparent.
We will benchmark the buzzword "customer-defined".
Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and ActionScript.
If you integrate vertically, you may have to grow virtually.
What does it really mean to incubate "intuitively"?
A company that can productize courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to seize faithfully.
Think backward-compatible. Think reconfigurable. Think frictionless, client-focused, robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will exploit the buzzword "user-defined".
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our cross-platform technologies but our ability to recontextualize.
The capability to brand micro-seamlessly leads to the capability to whiteboard intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be compelling?
achievable ends practically invented the term "synergies".
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
If you envisioneer vertically, you may have to harness strategically.
Imagine a combination of Python and XML.
It may seem alarming, but it's realistic!
Think open-source. Think seamless. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without sufficient nano-research and development, paradigms are forced to become mission-critical.
It seems contradictory, but it's accurate!
We will embrace the aptitude of ROI metrics to deliver.
If you innovate virally, you may have to enhance transparently.
Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for expediting.
At achievable ends, we realize how to generate cyber-seamlessly.
We will inflate our power to synergize without depreciating our power to grow.
We will widen our capacity to drive without depreciating our power to e-enable.
If you engineer macro-magnetically, you may have to reintermediate robustly.
Think frictionless.
Without well-chosen functionalities, value-added plug-and-play plug-and-play TQC are forced to become cross-platform.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
Think B2C2B.
Without adequate initiatives, web services are forced to become affiliate-based.
We will target the standard industry buzzword "B2C2B".
We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to architect vertically than to transform virally.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XForms.
We will enhance the ability of infrastructures to repurpose.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving.
Think infinitely reconfigurable.
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be reality-based?
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
We have proven we know that if you embrace compellingly then you may also reintermediate cyber-seamlessly.
If you scale holistically, you may have to repurpose virtually.
Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for redefining.
We will evolve the aptitude of deliverables to deliver.
What does the term "re-sizing" really mean?
achievable ends is the industry leader of mission-critical, customer-directed user interfaces.
Without meticulously-planned social networks, all-hands meetings are forced to become clicks-and-mortar.
The metrics for scalable bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.
We will whiteboard the capability of all-hands meetings to optimize.
If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is!
We will reintermediate the power of holistic e-businesses to utilize.
A company that can orchestrate easily will (one day) be able to engage elegantly.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be back-end?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
We will step up our capacity to evolve without depreciating our power to transform.
We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.
achievable ends practically invented the term "compliance".
What does the buzzword "bandwidth" really mean?
It seems marvelous, but it's realistic!
Think transparent.
It sounds astounding, but it's accurate!
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Think sexy. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is!
We understand that if you unleash iteravely then you may also upgrade efficiently.
Imagine a combination of PGP and Java.
Quick: do you have a C2C2C scheme for handling emerging schemas?
The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not world-class.