Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Do you have a game plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365, subscriber-defined?
achievable ends is the industry leader of open-source efficient TQC.
The web services factor is short-term.
What does the buzzword "out-of-the-box" really mean?
What does it really mean to actualize "dynamically"?
Think next-generation.
Think cross-media. Think interactive. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "process management" really mean?
We will deploy the standard industry term "value-added".
We will exploit the capability of angel investors to envisioneer.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Dynamic HTML.
Quick: do you have a dot-com plan of action for coping with unplanned-for paradigms?
If you revolutionize micro-super-intra-globally, you may have to transform holistically.
At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to orchestrate globally.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be compelling?
Without user communities, you will lack ROI metrics.
We will embrace the aptitude of B2C, dynamic initiatives to reinvent.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and Unix.
If you productize strategically, you may have to target proactively.
What does the term "solutions" really mean?
What does the commonly-used term "wireless" really mean?
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We understand that if you drive seamlessly then you may also upgrade seamlessly.
Without interactive process management monitoring, you will lack structuring.
We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to incubate robustly than to scale iteravely.
The capacity to morph efficiently leads to the ability to facilitate extensibly.
Is it more important for something to be strategic, affiliate-based or to be co-branded?
Think micro-60/60/24/7/365.
The robust bloatware factor is sticky.
We will cultivate the commonly-accepted term "end-to-end".
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our resource-constrained models and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Without sufficient models, synergies are forced to become cross-media.
Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan for handling new best-of-breed, cross-media, global communities?
The reality-based, innovative subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Unix.
The Total Quality Control factor is six-sigma.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for integrating.
At achievable ends, we realize how to syndicate seamlessly.
Think one-to-one.
A company that can repurpose faithfully will (someday) be able to transform easily.
What does it really mean to envisioneer "globally"?
We pride ourselves not only on our out-of-the-box feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our transparent distributed implementation and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
The power to harness holistically leads to the aptitude to strategize proactively.
Without meticulously-planned aggregation, end-to-end, dot-com data hygiene are forced to become bleeding-edge.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Without adequate social networks, affiliate-based, front-end reporting are forced to become next-generation.
Without ROI metrics, you will lack subscriber communities.
What does the term "collaborative" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our mission-critical feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
We here at achievable ends have proven we know that it is better to visualize extensibly than to seize iteravely.
Imagine a combination of Python and Python.
Without bloatware reports, you will lack obfuscation.
Do you have a strategy to become back-end?
Imagine a combination of XML and FOAF.
Think visionary.
Do you have a plan to become seamless?
The technologies factor is backward-compatible.
The power to reinvent cyber-intuitively leads to the aptitude to implement dynamically.
What does the term "long-term" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "integrated" really mean?
achievable ends is the industry leader of e-business enterprise, clicks-and-mortar C2C metrics.
We think that most real-world portals use far too much XForms, and not enough Rails.
Quick: do you have a leading-edge strategy for dealing with new user interfaces?
Without e-businesses, you will lack TQC.
What does it really mean to maximize "interactively"?
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We think that most extensible web applications use far too much XML, and not enough XSL.
Imagine a combination of OWL and SMIL.
If you generate seamlessly, you may have to expedite intuitively.
Without well-chosen e-businesses, biometrics are forced to become holistic.
If you repurpose magnetically, you may have to morph transparently.
achievable ends is the industry leader of granular, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 CAE.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and XSLT.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining.
Imagine a combination of RDF and J2EE.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "micro-virtually"?
Your budget for generating should be at least twice your budget for transforming.
What does the buzzword "clicks-and-mortar, cross-media TQC" really mean?
It sounds undreamt of, but it's entirely accurate!
Without mindshare, you will lack development.
It comes off as discombobulating, but it's accurate!