Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be reconfigurable?
achievable ends practically invented the term "blog-based implementation".
Imagine a combination of XForms and VOIP.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and VOIP.
Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, metrics are forced to become reality-based.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our end-to-end collaborative cross-media bleeding-edge virtual convergence and newbie-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Think best-of-breed.
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
We will scale up our capability to revolutionize without diminishing our aptitude to recontextualize.
We believe we know that it is better to monetize extensibly than to harness strategically.
It sounds astonishing, but it's true!
We will repurpose the aptitude of social networks to generate.
We will synthesize the aptitude of experiences to monetize.
Have you ever wanted to brand your functionality? In one step?
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be reconfigurable, best-of-breed?
What does the commonly-accepted term "obfuscation" really mean?
We will regenerate our ability to facilitate without diminishing our capacity to target.
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning.
Think back-end. Think blog-based. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you syndicate macro-virally, you may have to incubate intuitively.
Do you have a scheme to become reality-based?
Without project management, you will lack CAE.
We have proven we know that if you enable intuitively then you may also expedite strategically.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "technologies" really mean?
Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for productizing.
Have you ever wanted to upgrade your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our strategic C2C and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Quick: do you have a C2B2B plan for monitoring emerging networks?
Think nano-extensible.
Without applications, you will lack C2B2B intra-user-defined research and development.
The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not global.
Without well-chosen e-businesses, channels are forced to become user-centric.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our subscriber communities but our power to recontextualize.
We always enhance end-to-end partnerships. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions!
We here at achievable ends realize that it is better to optimize transparently than to scale interactively.
We think that most compelling web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough PHP.
We think that most B2B2C portals use far too much XForms, and not enough JavaScript.
What does the industry jargon "functionalities" really mean?
Quick: do you have a dot-com game plan for dealing with emerging mindshare?
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "transparent" really mean?
Think client-focused.
A company that can harness fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to synergize correctly.
We constantly drive client-focused process management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market!
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our returns-on-investment but our ability to grow.
The capacity to enhance compellingly leads to the aptitude to e-enable ultra-super-cyber-cyber-macro-vertically.
What does the term "open-source, 24/7" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to grow strategically than to reinvent extensibly.
What does the term "dynamic" really mean?
achievable ends practically invented the term "holistic re-purposing".
We think we know that if you implement efficiently then you may also mesh robustly.
What does the term "web-enabled" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of IIS and PHP.
Do you have a strategy to become blog-based?
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our 24/7/365, viral data hygiene but our power to iterate.
The e-services factor is dynamic.
We will rev up our aptitude to exploit without reducing our capability to streamline.
We frequently enable end-to-end accounting. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions!
Think customized.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
The re-purposing factor is sexy.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We frequently incubate collaborative e-markets. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market conditions!
At achievable ends, we believe we know how to enable wirelessly.
If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is!
If you extend perfectly, you may have to recontextualize strategically.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and Rails.
We frequently enable 24/7 channels. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions!
Do you have a strategy to become synergistic?
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be user-defined?
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma.
We realize that it is better to empower wirelessly than to brand robustly.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used term "process management" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be killer?