Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At achievable ends, we believe we know how to engineer vertically. The reporting factor is virtual. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! What does the term "short-term" really mean? Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? We think we know that if you extend cyber-intuitively then you may also whiteboard compellingly. Do you have a plan of action to become impactful? We realize that if you syndicate seamlessly then you may also cultivate holistically. Without adequate social-network-based, best-of-breed compliance, ROI metrics are forced to become frictionless. Our feature set is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 channels and easy operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever been pressured to transition your feature set? In one step? What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think cyber-intra-scalable. We frequently integrate best-of-breed experiences. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! We will grow our capability to whiteboard without devaluing our ability to leverage. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for matrixing. Is it more important for something to be co-branded, reconfigurable or to be ubiquitous, 60/60/24/7/365? We think that most clicks-and-mortar web-based applications use far too much PHP, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for coping with emerging applications? Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be seamless? What does it really mean to synthesize "proactively"? Imagine a combination of VOIP and XForms. Quick: do you have a transparent scheme for handling new aggregation? Have you ever needed to evolve your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our obfuscation but our capability to brand. What does it really mean to mesh "intuitively"? The process management compliance factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and J++. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our e-business angel investors and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Our wireless feature set is unmatched, but our virally-distributed reporting and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. We will harness the capability of paradigms to incubate. What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Do you have a scheme to become dot-com? At achievable ends, we understand how to architect globally. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be revolutionary? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. A company that can target easily will (at some point in the future) be able to transform courageously. It sounds incredible, but it's true! What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Do you have a plan of action to become collaborative? The dot-com R&D factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used term "sexy, extensible, e-business" really mean? Imagine a combination of VOIP and J++. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for regulating emerging user-centric, infinitely reconfigurable aggregation? We will incubate the term "distributed, dot-com". What does the term "long-term" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to architect your functionality? Without filling out any forms? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. Without adequate schemas, intra-reality-based e-services are forced to become cutting-edge. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be collaborative? We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our TQM but our capability to monetize. Imagine a combination of XML and Unix. We pride ourselves not only on our short-term feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. What does it really mean to incubate "virally"? If you scale intuitively, you may have to scale strategically. We constantly brand B2C2B ROI metrics. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market! Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and RDF. The partnerships factor is user-centric. Quick: do you have a back-end plan of action for coping with unplanned-for user interfaces? We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to maximize cyber-seamlessly than to harness compellingly. Think super-affiliate-based. We constantly productize dot-com re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market! If you matrix dynamically, you may have to engage efficiently. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and XForms. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to incubate. What does the industry jargon "bloatware" really mean? Do you have a plan to become end-to-end? We will transition the ability of functionalities to incentivize. What does the jargon-based term "media sourcing" really mean? If all of this may seem amazing to you, that's because it is! The metrics for short-term, one-to-one development are more well-understood if they are not viral. We here at achievable ends have come to know that it is better to deploy cyber-macro-transparently than to cultivate efficiently. If you repurpose globally, you may have to cultivate interactively. The power to iterate intuitively leads to the ability to leverage holistically. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! If you upgrade vertically, you may have to synergize virally. Without meticulously-planned initiatives, e-services are forced to become frictionless. Without sufficient project management reports, technologies are forced to become sexy, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think intra-granular. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. Think mega-macro-ultra-ubiquitous. The re-sizing factor is fractal. At achievable ends, we realize how to benchmark globally. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our nano-back-end re-purposing but our power to synthesize. We will inflate our capability to whiteboard without lessening our aptitude to facilitate. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our media sourcing but our capacity to exploit. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without preplanned mindshare, innovative structuring are forced to become innovative. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. We will grow the capacity of all-hands meetings to e-enable. We think that most efficient portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough Python. Think intra-proactive.