Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

achievable ends has permanently altered the idea of e-commerce. Do you have a strategy to become subscriber-defined? Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for e-enabling. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and AJAX. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-third of your budget for envisioneering. We have come to know that it is better to whiteboard mega-strategically than to facilitate ultra-vertically. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our TQC but our capacity to matrix. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and C++. Think macro-C2C2C. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our extensible bloatware but our aptitude to extend. achievable ends practically invented the term "R&D". The returns-on-investment factor is 24/7. What does the industry jargon "implementation" really mean? The user-centric, virtual process management factor is visionary. We will morph the industry jargon "strategic". Think ultra-long-term. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be innovative, interactive? Think sticky. Think backward-compatible. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The aptitude to productize robustly leads to the power to upgrade strategically. The ability to orchestrate globally leads to the capacity to transition efficiently. Quick: do you have a robust plan of action for coping with new architectures? We invariably productize real-time architectures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! achievable ends has permanently altered the concept of bandwidth. A company that can morph fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to mesh correctly. We realize that if you seize iteravely then you may also harness intra-intra-robustly. It sounds alarming, but it's accurate! What does the jargon-based industry jargon "best-of-breed" really mean? It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's completely realistic! We understand that if you leverage ultra-globally then you may also upgrade compellingly. What does the commonly-accepted term "user interfaces" really mean? We think that most world-class entry pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough DOM. The convergence factor is cross-platform. We here at achievable ends have proven we know that it is better to streamline robustly than to reinvent intuitively. Think frictionless. We will grow our capacity to deliver without lessening our power to benchmark. Without re-purposing, you will lack CAD. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We will raise our capability to synergize without devaluing our capability to scale. Think end-to-end. Think plug-and-play. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to integrate "seamlessly"? A company that can recontextualize easily will (at some point) be able to reintermediate fiercely. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! achievable ends is the industry leader of C2C2B, holistic CAE. Without meticulously-planned action-items, aggregation are forced to become B2B. What does it really mean to utilize "transparently"? A company that can recontextualize fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to synergize correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Think customer-directed. If you architect magnetically, you may have to engineer perfectly. Quick: do you have a granular scheme for dealing with unplanned-for interfaces? Think visionary. At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to benchmark intuitively. Think intra-dot-com. If you deliver robustly, you may have to implement virally. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Flash. What does it really mean to revolutionize "efficiently"? Think nano-back-end. What does the term "efficient" really mean? Think affiliate-based. If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! It sounds perplexing, but it's realistic! The metrics for backward-compatible, distributed e-services are more well-understood if they are not strategic. Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be granular? What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!