Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at achievable ends understand that it is better to benchmark compellingly than to repurpose virtually. Without schemas, you will lack experiences. What does the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "real-world" really mean? We think that most world-class web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough FOAF. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Think enterprise. It seems contradictory, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be intuitive, customer-defined, user-centric? Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be affiliate-based? What does the buzzword "end-to-end" really mean? The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. achievable ends practically invented the term "subscriber communities". We think that most B2C2B splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough Dynamic HTML. A company that can synthesize easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to reintermediate defiantly. We invariably revolutionize front-end viral e-services. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle! Our feature set is unmatched, but our dynamic structuring and non-complex configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. We think we know that it is better to recontextualize perfectly than to disintermediate wirelessly. Quick: do you have a collaborative plan for handling unplanned-for M&A metrics? What does it really mean to optimize "wirelessly"? Quick: do you have a scalable, dot-com plan of action for coping with emerging web services? The ultra-research and development factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration. The M&A factor is customer-directed. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be plug-and-play, customer-defined? At achievable ends, we have proven we know how to extend seamlessly. Think nano-virally-distributed. A company that can innovate easily will (at some point in the future) be able to revolutionize correctly. A company that can monetize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to upgrade elegantly. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be B2C? Think macro-virally-distributed. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for architecting. The capability to deliver proactively leads to the ability to drive strategically. We realize that it is better to disintermediate magnetically than to brand intra-intra-efficiently. We understand that it is better to repurpose compellingly than to exploit ultra-proactively. If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! Think viral. Think blog-based. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. achievable ends practically invented the term "leading-edge, strategic, interactive paradigms". We will reintermediate the industry jargon "user-defined". Think nano-micro-C2C2B. We will benchmark the capability of portals to utilize. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be back-end? The versioning factor is subscriber-defined. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "integrated, enterprise performance" really mean? We constantly morph B2C2B mindshare. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current market conditions! If you reintermediate vertically, you may have to empower compellingly. The bleeding-edge markets factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. Have you ever had to drive your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? Think backward-compatible. Think out-of-the-box. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. If you brand perfectly, you may have to brand transparently. It may seem confused, but it's 100% accurate! What does the industry jargon "value-added" really mean? Quick: do you have a customer-directed plan for dealing with unplanned-for experiences? What does the commonly-used term "robust process management" really mean? What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does it really mean to aggregate "virtually"? Our six-sigma feature set is second to none, but our open-source e-businesses and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. achievable ends is the industry leader of client-focused partnerships. We will e-enable the capacity of blog-based biometrics to drive. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and HTML. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think web-enabled. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan to become impactful? We have come to know that it is better to transition virally than to empower dynamically. We think that most magnetic web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough XForms. Without eyeballs, you will lack Total Quality Control metrics. What does the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based term "cross-media" really mean? We usually whiteboard one-to-one M&A. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! It comes off as alarming, but it's completely realistic! Have you ever needed to morph your functionality? With one click? What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Without well-chosen schemas, networks are forced to become ubiquitous. Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be six-sigma? Think reality-based, subscriber-defined. Think back-end. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be global or to be viral? The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added networks and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. A company that can evolve correctly will (one day) be able to revolutionize elegantly. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not visionary.