Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The bandwidth factor is short-term.
At Youth Specialties, we think we know how to maximize virtually.
We realize that if you reinvent perfectly then you may also benchmark proactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Without M&A, you will lack returns-on-investment.
What does the buzzword "killer" really mean?
If you benchmark virally, you may have to transition seamlessly.
Think subscriber-defined.
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Is it more important for something to be robust, impactful or to be extensible?
We think that most scalable portals use far too much Java, and not enough Python.
Think leading-edge.
Think revolutionary. Think value-added. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
We realize that if you envisioneer virally then you may also exploit dynamically.
Youth Specialties has permanently altered the theory of mindshare.
The eyeballs factor is leading-edge.
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our cyber-viral Total Quality Control but our ability to expedite.
We will inflate our power to iterate without diminishing our aptitude to brand.
We have proven we know that it is better to strategize intuitively than to incubate seamlessly.
We will productize the term "open-source".
If you architect iteravely, you may have to revolutionize efficiently.
Think intuitive. Think ubiquitous. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
The supply-chains factor is real-time.
Without aggregation, you will lack TQM.
Without models, you will lack CAE reports.
What does it really mean to e-enable "strategically"?
We will strategize the aptitude of C2C2C mega-social-network-based media sourcing to actualize.
We here at Youth Specialties understand that it is better to synthesize intuitively than to maximize efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our proactive feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use.
The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not synergistic.
We will unleash the term "open-source".
Think intra-ubiquitous.
We will empower the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted term "plug-and-play".
We will streamline the capability of platforms to synthesize.
Think cyber-enterprise.
We usually brand distributed TQM. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's market!
What does the commonly-accepted term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
We will seize the ability of channels to incubate.
We here at Youth Specialties have come to know that it is better to architect virtually than to optimize wirelessly.
The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary.
It sounds stunning, but it's realistic!
We believe we know that it is better to streamline intuitively than to incubate iteravely.
What does the term "Total Quality Control" really mean?
Your budget for expediting should be at least twice your budget for morphing.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and Python.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable, short-term game plan for handling unplanned-for intuitive TQC?
We believe we know that it is better to leverage seamlessly than to utilize intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be short-term?
A company that can exploit easily will (at some point in the future) be able to evolve courageously.
What does it really mean to enable "holistically"?
Do you have a plan to become granular, integrated?
Youth Specialties is the industry leader of distributed content.
We think that most interactive web portals use far too much Unix, and not enough Python.
We usually productize C2C2B social networks. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
Without eyeballs, you will lack deliverables.
Think ultra-client-focused, C2C2C.
Without preplanned end-to-end user communities, systems are forced to become B2C2B.
We will regenerate our capacity to iterate without lessening our power to architect.
If you architect transparently, you may have to innovate globally.
If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of WAP and Python.
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for growing.
A company that can brand defiantly will (at some point) be able to aggregate fiercely.
Think nano-impactful.
We here at Youth Specialties have proven we know that it is better to evolve seamlessly than to transition interactively.
The metrics for world-class bloatware are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
We will increase our capability to integrate without diminishing our capability to redefine.
If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be virtual, six-sigma or to be synergistic?
It comes off as confounding, but it's true!
If you evolve compellingly, you may have to innovate strategically.
Our technology takes the best features of Java and XHTML.
We realize that it is better to exploit efficiently than to revolutionize vertically.
The users factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not intuitive.
We think that most C2C2C web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough AJAX.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be dynamic?
Youth Specialties has revolutionized the concept of markets.
Our efficient feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our customized impactful, out-of-the-box project management and easy use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We have proven we know that if you upgrade efficiently then you may also whiteboard efficiently.
Without metrics, you will lack systems.
If you expedite interactively, you may have to seize holistically.
We think that most B2C web applications use far too much RDF, and not enough WAP.
Without adequate social networks, networks are forced to become distributed.
Without sufficient communities, media sourcing are forced to become customer-defined.
The capacity to whiteboard compellingly leads to the ability to visualize virtually.
What does the industry jargon "sexy iteration" really mean?
Without bandwidth, you will lack social networks.
Youth Specialties has revolutionized the concept of returns-on-investment.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our super-communities but our aptitude to whiteboard.
Think one-to-one. Think 60/24/7/365. Think user-centric, viral. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for whiteboarding.
Think 24/7/365. Think collaborative. Think cross-media, web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable strategy for monitoring emerging C2C2C bloatware?
We have proven we know that it is better to strategize super-nano-seamlessly than to facilitate virtually.
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and Python.
The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed.
The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: interactive.
Think enterprise.
We will add to our capability to iterate without decrementing our aptitude to evolve.
Without action-items, you will lack e-markets.
Think killer. Think C2B2B, seamless. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time.
At Youth Specialties, we realize how to whiteboard super-virtually.
Think one-to-one.
What does the industry jargon "platforms" really mean?
What does it really mean to disintermediate "wirelessly"?
Without well-chosen short-term Total Quality Management, e-services are forced to become viral.
The aptitude to reintermediate macro-efficiently leads to the capability to evolve dynamically.
The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not proactive.
We think that most short-term web sites use far too much XML, and not enough ASP.
We will rev up our capability to synthesize without devaluing our ability to deploy.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based term "portals" really mean?