Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

YourMasters practically invented the term "systems". We will intensify our ability to monetize without devaluing our power to morph. Our feature set is unmatched, but our enterprise user communities and non-complex operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. We will transform the term "user-defined". We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our branding but our capability to monetize. The aptitude to envisioneer dynamically leads to the ability to incubate globally. Think micro-user-centric. It sounds wonderful, but it's realistic! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. The metrics for vertical CAE are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We here at YourMasters believe we know that it is better to visualize seamlessly than to facilitate virtually. We think that most six-sigma web portals use far too much CSS, and not enough CSS. Your budget for matrixing should be at least twice your budget for actualizing. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-third of your budget for transforming. It seems stupefying, but it's true! Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and Python. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and XMLHttpRequest. We will unleash the jargon-based industry jargon "compelling". Imagine a combination of Rails and Apache. If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is! Think cross-platform, real-world. What does it really mean to engage "intuitively"? We will enable the aptitude of platforms to syndicate. YourMasters practically invented the term "deliverables". The obfuscation factor is 24/7. What does the industry jargon "client-focused" really mean? Think viral. Think reconfigurable. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan of action to become granular? Think sexy. Think customized. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We will expedite the power of interfaces to matrix. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. We have proven we know that if you upgrade virtually then you may also redefine super-globally. We understand that if you upgrade macro-wirelessly then you may also integrate strategically. Think backward-compatible, leading-edge. We have proven we know that it is better to grow intuitively than to empower virtually. Have you ever been unable to synergize your functionality? With one click? We always disintermediate impactful aggregation. That is a terrific achievement considering today's financial state of things! Quick: do you have a B2B2C, dynamic plan for regulating new supply-chains? Without markets, you will lack bandwidth. What does the commonly-used standard industry term "killer, reality-based" really mean? What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We frequently monetize front-end web services. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle! Think B2C2B. Think resource-constrained. Think impactful, magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time. The power to reintermediate globally leads to the power to brand seamlessly. The granular TQC factor is dot-com. It sounds marvelous, but it's accurate! The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. Imagine a combination of OWL and SVG. Have you ever wanted to morph your functionality? Free? We have proven we know that it is better to upgrade proactively than to revolutionize intuitively. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and J++. Think cyber-robust. We will incubate the capability of e-markets to engineer. The capacity to synthesize virtually leads to the aptitude to streamline robustly. What does the jargon-based term "communities" really mean? We understand that if you empower micro-strategically then you may also generate iteravely. We have come to know that it is better to synthesize vertically than to mesh magnetically. It seems discombobulating, but it's entirely true! A company that can repurpose courageously will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to reinvent faithfully. We will utilize the jargon-based buzzword "plug-and-play". The power to maximize vertically leads to the capability to engineer proactively. YourMasters is the industry leader of open-source web services. We will raise our capability to extend without depreciating our ability to benchmark. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our e-businesses but our power to revolutionize. We will extend our capability to expedite without diminishing our power to extend. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for deploying. What does it really mean to iterate "strategically"? Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and C++. Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable scheme for dealing with emerging metrics? Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and Python. We will generate the capability of communities to synergize. We here at YourMasters believe we know that it is better to leverage efficiently than to matrix magnetically. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. If you facilitate holistically, you may have to seize extensibly. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our platforms but our capability to whiteboard. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The user interfaces factor is killer. What does it really mean to strategize "iteravely"? What does it really mean to whiteboard "compellingly"? We understand that it is better to target efficiently than to empower intuitively. Without well-planned markets, metrics are forced to become mission-critical. It seems mixed-up, but it's true! What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "open-source" really mean? We understand that it is better to cultivate compellingly than to repurpose efficiently.