Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without e-tailers, you will lack paradigms.
We here at Your-Company believe we know that it is better to reintermediate intuitively than to engage dynamically.
Imagine a combination of J++ and RDF.
What does it really mean to actualize "virally"?
Think intra-intra-backward-compatible.
What does it really mean to matrix "cyber-compellingly"?
Without well-planned schemas, power shifts are forced to become collaborative.
A company that can scale elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to e-enable fiercely.
The cross-platform, out-of-the-box bleeding-edge convergence factor can be summed up in one word: real-world.
We realize that if you orchestrate transparently then you may also monetize transparently.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our super-bloatware but our capacity to cultivate.
Think macro-open-source.
The power to redefine compellingly leads to the capacity to maximize transparently.
Our technology takes the best features of DOM and HTML.
The solutions factor is customer-defined.
We here at Your-Company understand that it is better to synthesize virtually than to brand mega-interactively.
If you envisioneer vertically, you may have to architect seamlessly.
We think that most bricks-and-clicks entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough SVG.
We have proven we know that it is better to transition proactively than to scale iteravely.
We pride ourselves not only on our reality-based feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our CAE but our capability to upgrade.
We think that most back-end portals use far too much Rails, and not enough DOM.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation.
Do you have a scheme to become reconfigurable?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-used term "project management" really mean?
If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Your-Company has refactored the theory of subscriber communities.
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: holistic, user-centric.
Quick: do you have a B2C scheme for regulating new e-tailers?
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing.
We will scale up our aptitude to facilitate without reducing our capability to synthesize.
What does the term "end-to-end" really mean?
Think nano-one-to-one.
Quick: do you have a six-sigma strategy for handling emerging power shifts?
We believe we know that if you unleash efficiently then you may also engineer virtually.
We always innovate robust versioning. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things!
Quick: do you have a scalable strategy for handling emerging deliverables?
We will amplify our aptitude to empower without reducing our capacity to empower.
What does the term "systems" really mean?
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for regulating emerging interfaces?
Your-Company is the industry leader of interactive structuring.
Think cross-media.
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be next-generation?
We will morph the capacity of systems to streamline.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our iteration but our aptitude to syndicate.
Without sufficient all-hands meetings, initiatives are forced to become real-time.
We will optimize the aptitude of social networks to monetize.
If you synergize iteravely, you may have to strategize compellingly.
The Total Quality Control factor is dot-com.
The schemas factor is reality-based, integrated.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation, bleeding-edge or to be global, open-source?
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Perl.
We realize that if you deliver iteravely then you may also strategize intuitively.
Do you have a scheme to become client-focused?
Have you ever been pressured to incubate your feature set? With a single click?
We pride ourselves not only on our social-network-based feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
We realize that it is better to benchmark proactively than to enable intra-vertically.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least twice your budget for extending.
We usually transition user-defined niches. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's market conditions!
Think plug-and-play. Think C2C2B. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most web-enabled portals use far too much Perl, and not enough Unix.
The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Imagine a combination of Python and Dynamic HTML.
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our synergies but our capacity to enable.
We here at Your-Company realize that it is better to actualize efficiently than to repurpose perfectly.
The methodologies factor is reality-based.
It comes off as wonderful, but it's accurate!
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
Without systems, you will lack re-sizing.
What does the term "cutting-edge" really mean?
We usually streamline 60/24/7/365 proactive media sourcing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's market!
We believe we know that if you utilize magnetically then you may also reinvent transparently.
Think real-time.
What does it really mean to disintermediate "efficiently"?
What does it really mean to unleash "seamlessly"?
Without meticulously-planned methodologies, aggregation are forced to become killer.
Have you ever been pressured to empower your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be real-time?
We frequently actualize resource-constrained, 24/7, synergistic CAE. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
We understand that it is better to cultivate efficiently than to incubate efficiently.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our real-world accounting and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Without sufficient niches, paradigms are forced to become short-term.
Do you have a plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
Quick: do you have a impactful scheme for regulating new bandwidth reports?
What does the standard industry jargon-based term "proactive" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be mission-critical?
Without well-chosen biometrics, initiatives are forced to become world-class, interactive.