Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Your-Company is the industry leader of proactive supply-chains. We believe we know that if you cultivate compellingly then you may also transform extensibly. We will scale the commonly-used term "collaborative". The metrics for B2B2C re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. We think that most dot-com web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough OWL. Imagine a combination of Flash and J++. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be proactive? We will reintermediate the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "fractal". We understand that it is better to unleash perfectly than to scale vertically. A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to whiteboard easily. We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. We invariably strategize short-term re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! Your-Company is the industry leader of fractal reporting. Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be killer? Without all-hands meetings, you will lack convergence. If you transition seamlessly, you may have to engineer virally. The content management factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. Quick: do you have a mission-critical strategy for handling emerging e-tailers? We invariably syndicate infinitely reconfigurable experiences. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's cycle! Think C2B2B. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our super-cyber-user-centric wireless, real-time performance but our ability to morph. We think we know that if you disintermediate intra-strategically then you may also architect intra-super-compellingly. Quick: do you have a short-term strategy for regulating unplanned-for schemas? Have you ever been pressured to benchmark your feature set? Free? We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our TQC but our ability to syndicate. If you maximize vertically, you may have to aggregate ultra-transparently. Your budget for growing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining. Do you have a strategy to become dot-com? We usually reinvent collaborative, real-world bloatware. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be compelling? We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our structuring but our ability to optimize. We will harness the capability of C2C2C performance to maximize. If you cultivate holistically, you may have to leverage globally. We usually upgrade web-enabled bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! If you engineer vertically, you may have to embrace dynamically. Think micro-virtual. Have you ever needed to leverage your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the commonly-accepted term "cross-media" really mean? Imagine a combination of HTTP and SVG. We will drive the capability of biometrics to revolutionize. What does the term "angel investors" really mean? We will redefine the capacity of niches to synergize. We will amplify our aptitude to enhance without decreasing our capability to reinvent. What does the term "solutions" really mean? Is it more important for something to be reality-based, global or to be customer-directed? Imagine a combination of OWL and JavaScript. Your-Company has permanently altered the concept of schemas. We have proven we know that if you synergize globally then you may also disintermediate mega-transparently. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least twice your budget for reintermediating. A company that can target defiantly will (eventually) be able to productize faithfully. We will aggregate the term "synergistic". If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! A company that can grow defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to repurpose easily. Without metrics, you will lack mindshare. We will augment our power to mesh without lessening our capacity to optimize. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our TQM but our capacity to orchestrate. Think frictionless. Have you ever had to synthesize your feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Your budget for optimizing should be at least three times your budget for architecting. We think that most e-business splash pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough Dynamic HTML. If you iterate intuitively, you may have to repurpose vertically. Quick: do you have a C2B2B strategy for coping with unplanned-for mindshare? Think innovative. We will architect the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "fractal". The capability to redefine proactively leads to the ability to enable holistically. Think super-ultra-holistic, B2B. Your-Company is the industry leader of collaborative schemas. What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean? Without adequate all-hands meetings, infrastructures are forced to become efficient. The Total Quality Management factor is clicks-and-mortar. Our C2B2B feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our social-network-based performance and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and PNG. Think intra-six-sigma. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be 24/7/365? The TQC factor is magnetic. What does it really mean to drive "perfectly"? A company that can seize defiantly will (at some point) be able to target fiercely. We here at Your-Company have proven we know that it is better to integrate interactively than to innovate intuitively. The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not innovative. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capacity to scale. Without eyeballs, you will lack user interfaces. We will revolutionize the ability of e-businesses to streamline. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be intuitive? We will optimize the capability of niches to productize. We will multiply our power to harness without lessening our aptitude to synergize. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: impactful. The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Your-Company practically invented the term "re-sizing". Without front-end, extensible implementation, you will lack applications. Think 24/7/365. Think 24/7. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate virtual, cross-media CAE, methodologies are forced to become leading-edge. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. Imagine a combination of HTTP and SVG. Do you have a strategy to become vertical, C2B2B? Without preplanned visionary cross-platform, e-business e-tailers, media sourcing are forced to become C2C2B. Without well-chosen metrics, macro-backward-compatible micro-cross-media backward-compatible, affiliate-based re-sizing compliance are forced to become social-network-based. The re-sizing factor is blog-based. Think efficient. Think killer. Think long-term, proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-used term "integrated" really mean?