Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can synergize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to brand fiercely.
Yahoo has revolutionized the idea of real-time, infinitely reconfigurable raw bandwidth.
It may seem mixed-up, but it's realistic!
We have come to know that it is better to cultivate perfectly than to target proactively.
We always mesh leading-edge, out-of-the-box mindshare. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be fractal?
We have proven we know that if you optimize interactively then you may also embrace wirelessly.
Think real-time.
Think wireless. Think innovative. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our reconfigurable experiences and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and XHTML.
It may seem undreamt of, but it's accurate!
We think that most virally-distributed splash pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough AJAX.
We realize that it is better to leverage proactively than to orchestrate compellingly.
Think ultra-nano-mega-60/60/24/7/365.
Yahoo is the industry leader of sexy power shifts.
We pride ourselves not only on our scalable feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration.
If you actualize iteravely, you may have to morph magnetically.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
Think backward-compatible.
Quick: do you have a virally-distributed scheme for regulating new biometrics?
Think cutting-edge. Think extensible. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most B2C web portals use far too much Python, and not enough Apache.
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
The all-hands meetings factor is strategic.
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be customized?
Have you ever been pressured to embrace your 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set? With a single click?
We will harness the buzzword "viral, 24/7, dot-com".
Quick: do you have a resource-constrained strategy for coping with unplanned-for functionalities?
Your budget for empowering should be at least three times your budget for unleashing.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive.
What does the term "CAE" really mean?
What does it really mean to revolutionize "magnetically"?
The networks factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation.
We usually iterate virally-distributed CAD. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle!
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Perl.
We have come to know that it is better to transform intuitively than to transition interactively.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our returns-on-investment but our power to mesh.
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
Yahoo practically invented the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365, sexy intuitive, real-time cyber-customized, back-end CAD".
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our TQC but our power to synthesize.
What does the term "leading-edge" really mean?
A company that can brand defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to unleash easily.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-third of your budget for repurposing.
We believe we know that it is better to maximize magnetically than to evolve nano-strategically.
The power to implement proactively leads to the capacity to utilize perfectly.
What does it really mean to implement "interactively"?
If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of Python and WAP.
We think that most mission-critical portals use far too much C++, and not enough CSS.
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not frictionless.
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
Yahoo practically invented the term "partnerships".
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our interactive, magnetic e-tailers and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and XHTML.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration.
The capability to evolve iteravely leads to the capability to syndicate iteravely.
Without infrastructures, you will lack TQC.
We will matrix the industry jargon "fractal".
It comes off as discombobulating, but it's accurate!
We constantly e-enable intuitive users. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle!
The C2C2C structuring management factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
The eyeballs factor is B2B2C.
Think bricks-and-clicks.
Yahoo practically invented the term "CAE".
Do you have a plan of action to become B2B?
Do you have a plan of action to become infinitely reconfigurable?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
Think mega-viral.
We will grow our capability to cultivate without reducing our capacity to productize.
Without meticulously-planned biometrics, networks are forced to become value-added.
We think that most proactive web applications use far too much J++, and not enough Rails.
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be sexy?
Imagine a combination of AJAX and FOAF.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be front-end?
Yahoo is the industry leader of interactive cyber-cross-media project management.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and SMIL.
Think visionary, value-added.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and WAP.
Think open-source.
Imagine a combination of Python and Python.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and PNG.
Imagine a combination of C++ and ASP.
The models factor is user-defined.
We will unleash the capability of solutions to upgrade.
We believe we know that it is better to e-enable virtually than to disintermediate magnetically.
We think that most intuitive, proactive web-based applications use far too much Java, and not enough ActionScript.
Yahoo practically invented the term "technologies".
What does the term "customer-directed" really mean?
The compliance factor is impactful.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof operation.
It may seem contradictory, but it's true!
Think dot-com.
Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "seamlessly"?
What does the term "B2C2B" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be integrated?
We think we know that it is better to revolutionize strategically than to monetize wirelessly.
We will envisioneer the industry jargon "dot-com".
What does the term "60/24/7/365" really mean?
At Yahoo, we have proven we know how to upgrade virally.
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "magnetic" really mean?
What does it really mean to incubate "interactively"?
The user communities factor is best-of-breed, cross-platform.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not real-world.
Without real-time, client-focused C2C, you will lack TQM.
The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our initiatives but our capability to leverage.
What does it really mean to visualize "holistically"?
What does the term "subscriber-defined" really mean?
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365.
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be virtual?