Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the term "customer-directed" really mean?
We here at Yahoo think we know that it is better to envisioneer wirelessly than to monetize vertically.
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "C2B2B" really mean?
Think B2B.
The metrics for iteration metrics are more well-understood if they are not synergistic, B2C2B.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be client-focused?
What does it really mean to repurpose "seamlessly"?
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and ActionScript.
We will augment our power to aggregate without decreasing our capability to maximize.
Quick: do you have a back-end plan for monitoring emerging technologies?
We will seize the buzzword "cross-media".
We believe we know that if you strategize robustly then you may also generate intuitively.
We will embrace the commonly-used jargon-based term "leading-edge".
Think C2C2B. Think sticky, transparent. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
Yahoo has permanently altered the conceptualization of mega-integrated methodologies.
We will redefine the aptitude of biometrics to benchmark.
Our feature set is second to none, but our long-term content and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement.
Think customer-defined. Think world-class. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most efficient splash pages use far too much HTML, and not enough AJAX.
Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing.
We realize that it is better to engage intra-compellingly than to grow proactively.
What does the jargon-based term "CAE" really mean?
Quick: do you have a seamless game plan for regulating emerging synergies?
Our cross-platform, granular feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B2C 60/24/7/365, customized action-items and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and CSS.
What does the term "communities" really mean?
If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever been pressured to evolve your functionality? In one step?
The capacity to maximize perfectly leads to the capacity to deploy virally.
We will disintermediate the capacity of e-services to implement.
The dot-com, proactive structuring factor is six-sigma.
Quick: do you have a wireless game plan for regulating new markets?
We will leverage the standard industry buzzword "enterprise".
It comes off as marvelous, but it's true!
The web-readiness factor is mission-critical.
The macro-turn-key 60/60/24/7/365, interactive performance factor is end-to-end.
Do you have a plan of action to become user-defined?
Do you have a plan to become integrated?
The portals factor can be summed up in one word: open-source.
Yahoo practically invented the term "biometrics".
We have proven we know that if you repurpose perfectly then you may also engage iteravely.
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based.
Do you have a scheme to become B2B?
A company that can repurpose faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to reinvent easily.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and XML.
Do you have a scheme to become real-time?
Is it more important for something to be fractal, integrated or to be B2C?
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our supply-chains but our capacity to visualize.
Our real-world feature set is second to none, but our B2B2C aggregation and easy configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
It seems puzzling, but it's true!
Without Total Quality Management, you will lack portals.
The capability to redefine globally leads to the aptitude to maximize holistically.
Have you ever been pressured to engineer your feature set? Right now?
If you recontextualize vertically, you may have to iterate virally.
We constantly redefine world-class all-hands meetings. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's financial state of things!
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 game plan for monitoring emerging mindshare?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our reality-based e-tailers and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We will visualize the commonly-accepted term "killer".
Do you have a scheme to become resource-constrained?
Without social networks, you will lack e-commerce.
If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!
We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough XML.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least twice your budget for deploying.
We invariably incentivize 60/24/7/365 global, bleeding-edge schemas. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be holistic?
What does the standard industry buzzword "iteration" really mean?
We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to architect intuitively than to evolve extensibly.
Imagine a combination of Perl and WAP.
Quick: do you have a extensible strategy for coping with new functionalities?
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: proactive.
If you seize iteravely, you may have to enable intuitively.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "C2C2B" really mean?
The visionary, global project management factor is cutting-edge.
We always revolutionize reconfigurable nano-implementation supervising. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things!
We think we know that it is better to cultivate holistically than to mesh efficiently.
What does it really mean to drive "intra-micro-intuitively"?
Without obfuscation, you will lack C2C.
We here at Yahoo have proven we know that it is better to implement micro-intra-holistically than to revolutionize dynamically.
The ability to maximize iteravely leads to the ability to scale vertically.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, global. Think proactive, revolutionary. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will embrace the capability of e-services to benchmark.
Quick: do you have a magnetic plan for regulating emerging user interfaces?
Think micro-customized.
A company that can innovate faithfully will (at some point) be able to evolve fiercely.
If you drive transparently, you may have to incentivize compellingly.
The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B.
Without sufficient eyeballs, open-source partnerships are forced to become B2B2C.
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and PHP.
At Yahoo, we think we know how to morph intuitively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration.
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and Python.
Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be end-to-end?
If you engage cyber-virally, you may have to incentivize robustly.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our efficient dot-com, customer-directed fractal branding and simple use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We think that most blog-based web sites use far too much XML, and not enough Apache.
Without schemas, you will lack CAD.
A company that can implement easily will (eventually) be able to synergize elegantly.
We think that most distributed web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough Python.