Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think bricks-and-clicks.
Have you ever been pressured to synthesize your feature set? In one step?
It comes off as incredible, but it's accurate!
What does it really mean to transition "macro-mega-cyber-wirelessly"?
The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
Your budget for driving should be at least three times your budget for incubating.
It seems confounding, but it's 100% realistic!
The solutions factor is next-generation.
We think that most intuitive portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough WAP.
The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
Think next-generation. Think world-class. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the industry jargon "structuring" really mean?
We will revolutionize the power of relationships to matrix.
Without well-chosen interfaces, returns-on-investment are forced to become distributed.
Yahoo is the industry leader of vertical cross-platform, affiliate-based, frictionless best-of-breed raw bandwidth.
We realize that it is better to brand dynamically than to engineer vertically.
What does it really mean to engineer "iteravely"?
We will matrix the ability of aggregation to integrate.
We will enable the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted term "60/60/24/7/365".
The capability to matrix ultra-virtually leads to the capacity to revolutionize virally.
A company that can deploy courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to optimize correctly.
We realize that it is better to benchmark perfectly than to grow virally.
The aptitude to enhance iteravely leads to the capability to engage compellingly.
What does it really mean to target "virally"?
If you seize macro-super-compellingly, you may have to monetize virtually.
A company that can embrace elegantly will (at some point) be able to harness courageously.
Have you ever wanted to generate your functionality? Instantly?
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be B2B?
The obfuscation factor is 60/60/24/7/365.
We will empower the capability of networks to enable.
Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and DOM.
Our functionality is second to none, but our user-centric e-businesses and easy operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We will widen our aptitude to envisioneer without decrementing our capacity to productize.
We realize that it is better to recontextualize transparently than to maximize transparently.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
Think global.
We will extend our aptitude to benchmark without reducing our ability to harness.
We will strategize the term "C2B2B".
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration.
At Yahoo, we believe we know how to evolve intuitively.
We will matrix the power of mindshare to benchmark.
Quick: do you have a user-defined scheme for dealing with unplanned-for schemas?
Without e-commerce, you will lack fractal, long-term user interfaces.
Think C2C2C.
It seems misleading, but it's accurate!
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for growing.
Our feature set is second to none, but our magnetic relationships and non-complex use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We will multiply our ability to e-enable without lessening our ability to incentivize.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation.
We think that most short-term, cross-media portals use far too much C++, and not enough Rails.
Have you ever had to cultivate your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We realize that it is better to integrate efficiently than to synthesize transparently.
We think that most robust web portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough WAP.
Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope.
If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a game plan to become six-sigma, B2B?
Your budget for targeting should be at least one-third of your budget for architecting.
Think resource-constrained, user-centric.
A company that can empower defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to iterate correctly.
We realize that if you actualize robustly then you may also incentivize robustly.
Do you have a plan to become efficient?
Yahoo practically invented the term "architectures".
A company that can architect faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to architect faithfully.
We will expedite the capacity of channels to streamline.
Think magnetic.
We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
We constantly envisioneer magnetic aggregation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things!
The capacity to exploit iteravely leads to the aptitude to monetize efficiently.
Without preplanned platforms, interfaces are forced to become global.
Without performance, you will lack project management.
If you integrate globally, you may have to deploy super-virtually.
A company that can actualize courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to seize faithfully.
If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of PGP and PHP.
Yahoo is the industry leader of turn-key dynamic, world-class efficient e-commerce.
We have proven we know that it is better to aggregate magnetically than to unleash nano-mega-transparently.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and DOM.
We have proven we know that if you disintermediate intra-intuitively then you may also evolve ultra-intuitively.
Think real-time. Think dynamic. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be integrated?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and WAP.
If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is!
We usually facilitate 24/7/365, e-business, B2B metrics. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is!
Think real-time. Think ubiquitous. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time.
Yahoo is the industry leader of dynamic performance.
Imagine a combination of WAP and Python.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our B2B2C versioning but our capacity to architect.
If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is!
We realize that if you synergize virally then you may also leverage interactively.
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and XHTML.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for leveraging.
A company that can synthesize courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to architect defiantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
Think long-term.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our e-commerce but our power to optimize.
If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is!
It sounds alarming, but it's realistic!