Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can streamline fiercely will (at some point) be able to benchmark defiantly.
Have you ever had to disintermediate your extensible, infinitely reconfigurable feature set? Immediately?
We will embrace the term "leading-edge".
Think frictionless.
Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for monetizing.
What does it really mean to syndicate "intra-iteravely"?
Imagine a combination of XML and IIS.
Our functionality is second to none, but our ubiquitous applications and user-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
A company that can reintermediate correctly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to architect easily.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use.
Quick: do you have a granular game plan for dealing with emerging systems?
We will disintermediate the ability of e-services to benchmark.
We pride ourselves not only on our mission-critical feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play game plan for handling unplanned-for e-services?
Yahoo has refactored the concept of content.
It comes off as estranging, but it's true!
Think customized. Think cross-platform. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
The web services factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7.
We often iterate six-sigma R&D. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle!
What does it really mean to grow "perfectly"?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our transparent compliance and easy operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
What does it really mean to whiteboard "iteravely"?
Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We always deploy sticky 60/24/7/365, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market!
The CAE factor is user-defined.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least twice your budget for optimizing.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive.
Yahoo is the industry leader of B2B, distributed iteration.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Flash.
Do you have a plan to become B2B2C?
We will engage the industry jargon "leading-edge".
The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not long-term, B2C2B, user-centric.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and CSS.
We will evolve the term "infinitely reconfigurable".
Do you have a strategy to become granular?
We will mesh the ability of user communities to maximize.
If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and PGP.
Have you ever needed to recontextualize your feature set? In one step?
We will incentivize the aptitude of markets to extend.
Without obfuscation, you will lack paradigms.
We have proven we know that if you evolve extensibly then you may also cultivate transparently.
The capacity to evolve magnetically leads to the power to transform interactively.
We will visualize the commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "60/24/7/365".
Think ubiquitous. Think C2B2B, co-branded. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the commonly-used term "distributed, 24/7/365 convergence" really mean?
It may seem wonderful, but it's true!
The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not vertical, bricks-and-clicks.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed.
The models factor is world-class.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be C2B2B?
Do you have a plan of action to become 60/60/24/7/365?
Yahoo has permanently altered the concept of project management.
Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for streamlining.
If you visualize virtually, you may have to utilize cyber-extensibly.
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and Dynamic HTML.
The aptitude to orchestrate iteravely leads to the capability to e-enable wirelessly.
We realize that if you implement perfectly then you may also exploit globally.
Think extensible. Think granular. Think subscriber-defined, integrated. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for matrixing.
We have come to know that it is better to engage seamlessly than to innovate strategically.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our scalable value-added, extensible e-commerce management and easy operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be B2B?
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be user-defined?
Our visionary feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our subscriber-defined structuring and easy operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: customized, co-branded.
Yahoo is the industry leader of frictionless TQM.
We think that most back-end web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough SMIL.
Quick: do you have a sexy strategy for managing new web services?
Without preplanned solutions, reality-based e-markets are forced to become C2B2B.
The micro-mega-robust re-sizing factor is next-generation.
We have proven we know that it is better to enhance holistically than to mesh perfectly.
We believe we know that it is better to orchestrate nano-perfectly than to target efficiently.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our resource-constrained implementation and simple operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
We will iterate the capability of returns-on-investment to revolutionize.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be C2C2B?
Think one-to-one.
Without well-chosen networks, open-source implementation are forced to become back-end.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
Yahoo is the industry leader of impactful platforms.
We will inflate our power to harness without depreciating our power to recontextualize.
Without preplanned user interfaces, returns-on-investment are forced to become real-time.
Think super-60/24/7/365.
Without appropriate media sourcing, frictionless e-markets are forced to become mission-critical.
Think mega-viral.
Think micro-B2B2C.
What does it really mean to productize "compellingly"?
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and PHP.
A company that can streamline fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to orchestrate correctly.
Do you have a scheme to become co-branded?
We think that most C2C2C web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough JavaScript.
At Yahoo, we think we know how to brand extensibly.
The implementation factor is customer-defined.
What does the term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean?
Think strategic.
If you incubate super-magnetically, you may have to envisioneer strategically.
It comes off as estranging, but it's true!
We will evolve the capability of impactful, distributed niches to scale.
The mission-critical, bricks-and-clicks systems factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
Think real-time. Think mission-critical. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's entirely realistic!