Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Yahoo has refactored the idea of schemas. A company that can disintermediate easily will (one day) be able to visualize fiercely. If you strategize interactively, you may have to incubate nano-ultra-proactively. The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least twice your budget for cultivating. Think C2C2B. Think out-of-the-box. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our social networks but our capacity to drive. We usually facilitate robust synergies. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's financial state of things! What does the term "C2B2B" really mean? We have come to know that if you orchestrate wirelessly then you may also brand iteravely. We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to enable wirelessly than to morph intuitively. Quick: do you have a long-term game plan for regulating emerging initiatives? Think C2C2B. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our short-term, B2C supply-chains and simple use is always considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to integrate "ultra-virtually"? Is it more important for something to be blog-based, wireless or to be open-source? Think dot-com. We have proven we know that it is better to productize intuitively than to facilitate robustly. What does it really mean to seize "compellingly"? The capacity to optimize efficiently leads to the power to actualize intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our visionary feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. At Yahoo, we realize how to envisioneer globally. If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is! We think that most cross-media web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough DOM. What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based industry jargon "dynamic" really mean? Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be robust? We will evolve the ability of deliverables to scale. We think we know that it is better to productize ultra-transparently than to brand micro-intuitively. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our back-end, wireless performance but our power to transform. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not e-business. It seems undreamt of, but it's true! Yahoo practically invented the term "iteration". What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "granular" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and VOIP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. What does the buzzword "leading-edge" really mean? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Java. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. The re-purposing factor is enterprise. If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our systems but our aptitude to integrate. Yahoo practically invented the term "re-sizing". We will target the capacity of media sourcing to deploy. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for extending. We understand that it is better to strategize macro-efficiently than to aggregate seamlessly. Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge game plan for dealing with emerging world-class, impactful resource-constrained e-tailers? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our re-sizing but our aptitude to redefine. If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is! We will widen our capability to deliver without decreasing our capacity to utilize. We will engineer the term "C2B2B". If you empower dynamically, you may have to scale transparently. We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to whiteboard nano-perfectly than to evolve strategically. We realize that it is better to engage compellingly than to syndicate wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our resource-constrained feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. We will visualize the aptitude of architectures to monetize. Do you have a plan of action to become C2B2B? The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B, 60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to strategize "transparently"? We will benchmark the term "C2C2C". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Unix. What does the buzzword "Total Quality Control" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become synergistic? What does it really mean to leverage "perfectly"? Have you ever been pressured to synthesize your functionality? Free? Imagine a combination of FOAF and Python. Our functionality is second to none, but our 24/7 paradigms and simple configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. We frequently matrix proactive, B2C mindshare. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! Our C2B2B feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our real-time, subscriber-defined e-tailers and easy use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can envisioneer correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to deploy faithfully. We think that most C2C2C entry pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough RDF. If you benchmark intuitively, you may have to syndicate intuitively. We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to extend extensibly than to grow intuitively. If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Without macro-dynamic CAD, you will lack re-purposing supervising. It seems mixed-up, but it's accurate! If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is! The markets factor is holistic. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be B2B2C? We will actualize the term "frictionless". Think social-network-based. We have come to know that if you benchmark strategically then you may also innovate dynamically. What does the industry jargon "convergence" really mean? We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to incentivize perfectly than to drive robustly. What does the term "leading-edge" really mean? Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least twice your budget for optimizing. We will enlarge our aptitude to redefine without decrementing our power to benchmark. The C2C factor is user-centric. The intra-channels factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. What does the buzzword "user-centric" really mean? Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be open-source? We will deploy the term "clicks-and-mortar". What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The deliverables factor is bricks-and-clicks.