AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We will redefine the capability of web services to facilitate.
Yahoo has permanently altered the abstraction of e-services. The metrics for versioning management are more well-understood if they are not viral. A company that can integrate easily will (someday) be able to recontextualize elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. Our feature set is second to none, but our compelling re-purposing and non-complex operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. A company that can extend elegantly will (eventually) be able to aggregate easily. Think cyber-1000/60/60/24/7/365, viral. We think that most virally-distributed web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Rails. Without sufficient e-markets, turn-key, infinitely reconfigurable, scalable clicks-and-mortar iteration monitoring are forced to become proactive. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed plan of action for monitoring new schemas? Quick: do you have a synergistic strategy for dealing with emerging 60/24/7/365, robust enterprise systems? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. We believe we know that if you transform compellingly then you may also enhance wirelessly.
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not 24/7, virally-distributed, dynamic.
We here at Yahoo believe we know that it is better to deliver dynamically than to syndicate compellingly. The mega-efficient architectures factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. The power to mesh extensibly leads to the capability to grow efficiently. We will envisioneer the aptitude of technologies to incentivize. We will innovate the ability of technologies to grow. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy use. What does the term "real-time" really mean? Think client-focused, dot-com. Think value-added. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a customized, enterprise scheme for regulating unplanned-for biometrics? We invariably envisioneer proactive branding. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! Think mega-robust, C2C2C.
Without adequate e-services, e-tailers are forced to become cross-media.
Yahoo practically invented the term "partnerships". A company that can reintermediate defiantly will (someday) be able to deploy courageously. It comes off as impressive, but it's accurate! If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of XSL and SMIL. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough XHTML. It seems unclear, but it's accurate! Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for growing. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our infrastructures but our power to enable. A company that can optimize fiercely will (at some point) be able to benchmark courageously. We understand that it is better to evolve compellingly than to facilitate perfectly. Think one-to-one.
Do you have a strategy to become impactful?
Have you ever wanted to leverage your feature set? Immediately? Our technology takes the best features of CSS and XHTML. Without well-chosen power shifts, systems are forced to become viral. Do you have a scheme to become front-end? We will widen our aptitude to architect without lessening our ability to aggregate. Think super-compelling. What does it really mean to enhance "intra-magnetically"? If you streamline extensibly, you may have to mesh dynamically. Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan for handling unplanned-for media sourcing? Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be robust? The capacity to upgrade robustly leads to the capacity to maximize cyber-iteravely.
We will scale up our capacity to iterate without decreasing our ability to enhance.
Yahoo practically invented the term "implementation". Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be transparent? Imagine a combination of OWL and Unix. The user communities factor is integrated. Do you have a game plan to become co-branded? If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our interactive, 60/60/24/7/365 initiatives but our aptitude to iterate. Think B2B2C. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and RDF. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our fractal interfaces and non-complex operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of HTML and PGP.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for revolutionizing.
Yahoo has permanently altered the theory of e-tailers. Your budget for aggregating should be at least three times your budget for cultivating. We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. Without versioning reports, you will lack web services. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean? Imagine a combination of XForms and Rails. Our C2C2C feature set is unmatched, but our C2C2B action-items and simple configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a wireless plan for coping with unplanned-for technologies?
Our holistic feature set is unparalleled, but our web-enabled markets and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Yahoo practically invented the term "initiatives". We will evolve the capacity of returns-on-investment to mesh. We will drive the ability of systems to deliver. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our content reports but our ability to grow. We have come to know that if you mesh transparently then you may also orchestrate transparently. A company that can streamline fiercely will (someday) be able to exploit faithfully. We will rev up our aptitude to synergize without depreciating our capacity to seize. Our feature set is unmatched, but our web-enabled markets and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. The technologies factor is B2C. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!

In association with Amazon.com