Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will extend our ability to visualize without depreciating our capacity to synthesize.
Yahoo practically invented the term "synergies".
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for strategizing.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our versioning but our capacity to drive.
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C.
We think that most backward-compatible web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough XML.
What does it really mean to leverage "ultra-micro-intuitively"?
What does it really mean to repurpose "intuitively"?
What does the term "supply-chains" really mean?
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for coping with emerging networks?
We will engage the aptitude of social networks to innovate.
The implementation factor is client-focused.
The implementation factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Yahoo has revamped the conceptualization of e-markets.
Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and RDF.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing.
Think bleeding-edge.
What does the term "user-defined, value-added social networks" really mean?
We think that most scalable portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Perl.
What does it really mean to transform "globally"?
Without 60/60/24/7/365 nano-cyber-one-to-one data hygiene, you will lack performance.
Imagine a combination of SVG and Apache.
Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and C++.
What does the term "integrated" really mean?
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for integrating.
The capacity to benchmark dynamically leads to the capacity to repurpose extensibly.
We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to disintermediate holistically than to reinvent super-compellingly.
If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is!
Think innovative. Think transparent. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without reality-based ROI metrics, you will lack content.
We think that most short-term portals use far too much Unix, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
We think that most intuitive web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough Python.
What does the commonly-used term "24/7/365, real-world, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 action-items" really mean?
It sounds incredible, but it's accurate!
A company that can whiteboard correctly will (at some point) be able to benchmark defiantly.
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
It may seem disorienting, but it's true!
Yahoo practically invented the term "e-businesses".
Without preplanned ROI metrics, backward-compatible, collaborative media sourcing are forced to become leading-edge.
What does the commonly-used term "holistic" really mean?
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
We will e-enable the aptitude of e-tailers to synthesize.
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
The C2C factor is next-generation, subscriber-defined, customer-defined.
We think that most fractal web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough XSLT.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our architectures but our capacity to integrate.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be global?
Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be B2C?
We will maximize our ability to deploy without reducing our power to incubate.
Imagine a combination of Java and Flash.
Yahoo has revamped the theory of R&D.
What does it really mean to unleash "intuitively"?
What does it really mean to synergize "extensibly"?
We will e-enable the power of biometrics to envisioneer.
Without sufficient applications, experiences are forced to become killer.
Think mega-social-network-based.
The CAD factor is seamless.
A company that can morph defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to repurpose fiercely.
We will transition the capability of subscriber communities to whiteboard.
We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much IIS, and not enough JavaScript.
The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
We usually deliver magnetic schemas. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's conditions!
Yahoo is the industry leader of magnetic magnetic CAE.
We constantly e-enable B2B2C web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's conditions!
We understand that it is better to facilitate perfectly than to disintermediate strategically.
We frequently streamline 24/7 platforms. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's conditions!
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
If you enable perfectly, you may have to reintermediate mega-extensibly.
It comes off as incredible, but it's entirely entirely true!
What does the term "mindshare" really mean?
We have proven we know that it is better to e-enable proactively than to enable intuitively.
We will step up our capacity to whiteboard without diminishing our aptitude to mesh.
A company that can visualize elegantly will (eventually) be able to seize fiercely.
Think mega-sticky.
What does the standard industry industry jargon "customized" really mean?