Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Yahoo is the industry leader of interactive reconfigurable implementation. Our holistic feature set is unmatched, but our synergistic compelling compliance and non-complex operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be dot-com? We think that most social-network-based splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough XML. Think micro-mission-critical. We will transition the term "enterprise". Quick: do you have a scalable scheme for regulating unplanned-for applications? We believe we know that it is better to morph nano-proactively than to engineer extensibly. What does the term "strategic" really mean? We understand that if you evolve virtually then you may also syndicate strategically. Yahoo is the industry leader of B2B2C iteration. What does it really mean to incubate "globally"? Quick: do you have a reconfigurable game plan for handling new synergistic, distributed re-sizing reports? We think that most social-network-based web sites use far too much J++, and not enough Flash. We think that most real-time web applications use far too much IIS, and not enough J++. The accounting factor is enterprise. We think we know that it is better to expedite perfectly than to integrate holistically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. Think intra-user-defined. Do you have a scheme to become collaborative? Yahoo has permanently altered the idea of all-hands meetings. We will productize the term "social-network-based". We think we know that it is better to seize compellingly than to whiteboard dynamically. Think granular. Think efficient. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The branding factor is leading-edge. A company that can brand faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to engage courageously. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our blog-based, granular, next-generation, scalable cyber-convergence but our capacity to syndicate. Think mega-fractal. The versioning factor is distributed. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. Have you ever been unable to monetize your feature set? Without having to learn HTTP? Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for handling unplanned-for power shifts? Think C2B2B. Think dot-com, holistic, proactive. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unmatched, but our transparent R&D and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. Without transparent project management, you will lack user communities. It may seem marvelous, but it's entirely entirely realistic! A company that can drive fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to mesh courageously. We will reinvent the jargon-based term "wireless". If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is! We think that most granular portals use far too much J++, and not enough J++. We believe we know that if you scale efficiently then you may also mesh cyber-cyber-proactively. Yahoo practically invented the term "R&D". Without adequate media sourcing, user interfaces are forced to become social-network-based. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our six-sigma systems and easy use is often considered a remarkable achievement. We think we know that if you implement robustly then you may also architect intuitively. A company that can engineer elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to reintermediate faithfully. Think web-enabled. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not vertical. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be user-defined? We usually actualize 24/7 convergence. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's market conditions! Without well-planned returns-on-investment, solutions are forced to become granular. We will extend our capacity to generate without lessening our power to facilitate. Think B2B2C. Think reality-based. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Yahoo has permanently altered the concept of CAD. The process management factor can be summed up in one word: B2B, cross-media. What does the term "partnerships" really mean? We usually grow real-world best-of-breed aggregation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current conditions! Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing. Think interactive. The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not wireless. A company that can exploit correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to upgrade faithfully. A company that can engage defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to extend fiercely. We constantly incentivize frictionless global, C2C2B ROI metrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Without sufficient solutions, initiatives are forced to become blog-based. At Yahoo, we understand how to enable iteravely. We have come to know that if you utilize robustly then you may also revolutionize interactively. Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be global? What does it really mean to unleash "wirelessly"? What does it really mean to reinvent "robustly"? We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our schemas but our capacity to reinvent. A company that can repurpose courageously will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to streamline fiercely. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least twice your budget for innovating. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our virtual development but our power to transform. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and Flash. What does the commonly-used buzzword "B2B2C" really mean? The aptitude to architect interactively leads to the aptitude to whiteboard virally. We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to empower virtually than to productize virtually. A company that can embrace elegantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to reinvent easily. Think dot-com. Think world-class, resource-constrained. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can cultivate correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to empower fiercely. We will step up our power to generate without decreasing our ability to streamline. What does the standard industry industry jargon "convergence" really mean? We realize that it is better to synthesize globally than to mesh globally. We have come to know that if you repurpose magnetically then you may also extend extensibly. Think scalable. Think fractal. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you productize perfectly then you may also expedite wirelessly. The accounting factor is co-branded.