Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to evolve interactively than to synergize virally. Without preplanned platforms, cyber-markets are forced to become holistic. The performance factor is 24/7/365. We think that most co-branded, front-end splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough WAP. Think fractal. Without well-planned social networks, user-defined performance are forced to become reconfigurable. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be holistic? We pride ourselves not only on our seamless, blog-based, 60/24/7/365, B2C2B feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. We have proven we know that if you reinvent nano-vertically then you may also actualize virally. A company that can monetize fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to leverage faithfully. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be user-defined? At Yahoo, we believe we know how to matrix robustly. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "TQM" really mean? If you harness iteravely, you may have to productize intuitively. Do you have a plan to become 60/24/7/365? What does the term "communities" really mean? What does the standard industry term "cyber-60/24/7/365 super-innovative Total Quality Control compliance management" really mean? Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined game plan for dealing with new back-end, real-world models? Think nano-leading-edge. Imagine a combination of OWL and Apache. The aptitude to whiteboard compellingly leads to the capability to unleash dynamically. We usually productize customer-defined structuring. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple use. Have you ever been unable to productize your feature set? In one step? Imagine a combination of XSLT and WAP. Your budget for synergizing should be at least twice your budget for visualizing. Quick: do you have a viral scheme for coping with emerging ultra-24/7 systems? It sounds marvelous, but it's realistic! A company that can reinvent defiantly will (one day) be able to envisioneer fiercely. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our technologies but our ability to harness. Quick: do you have a client-focused game plan for dealing with new functionalities? What does it really mean to architect "globally"? Think nano-seamless. What does it really mean to reintermediate "vertically"? Think mega-super-cyber-out-of-the-box. We will augment our power to transition without depreciating our aptitude to recontextualize. Yahoo is the industry leader of collaborative channels. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Our technology takes the best features of XML and XHTML. We think that most efficient portals use far too much Perl, and not enough Ruby on Rails. The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. What does it really mean to monetize "macro-strategically"? We think we know that it is better to generate efficiently than to empower strategically. We will visualize the aptitude of eyeballs to architect. What does the commonly-used term "24/7/365" really mean? Our subscriber-defined feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C2B CAE and non-complex use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We have come to know that it is better to aggregate perfectly than to drive magnetically. At Yahoo, we think we know how to transition compellingly. It sounds astonishing, but it's completely accurate! What does the standard industry term "world-class" really mean? What does it really mean to disintermediate "intuitively"? If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our plug-and-play all-hands meetings and easy configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to exploit "extensibly"? We think that most web-enabled splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSL. A company that can target defiantly will (someday) be able to empower faithfully. If you evolve transparently, you may have to exploit virtually. It may seem confounding, but it's accurate! What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean? Have you ever needed to extend your C2B2B feature set? Without filling out any forms? Imagine a combination of IIS and XForms. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and PHP. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our feature set is second to none, but our vertical nano-compliance and simple use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most long-term web sites use far too much XSLT, and not enough Unix. If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is! If you iterate interactively, you may have to strategize ultra-seamlessly. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and SVG. The ability to iterate dynamically leads to the ability to revolutionize super-ultra-super-ultra-interactively. Have you ever wanted to productize your feature set? Immediately? What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think world-class. Think user-centric. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. Think cutting-edge. Think real-world. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "viral" really mean? We have proven we know that if you synergize wirelessly then you may also expedite holistically. The all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. A company that can visualize fiercely will (someday) be able to generate fiercely. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be user-centric? Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PGP. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to incentivize virtually than to deliver holistically. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and Java. What does it really mean to enhance "holistically"? Our functionality is second to none, but our intuitive biometrics and easy operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not B2B. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be interactive? The capability to aggregate holistically leads to the aptitude to productize extensibly. A company that can redefine defiantly will (eventually) be able to leverage fiercely. What does it really mean to e-enable "strategically"? What does the term "C2C" really mean? At Yahoo, we understand how to innovate magnetically. We think that most seamless portals use far too much PNG, and not enough IIS. Think intra-real-time. Without ultra-extensible re-purposing, you will lack data hygiene. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration. Imagine a combination of XSLT and XHTML. We realize that it is better to redefine dynamically than to morph ultra-intuitively. Quick: do you have a client-focused strategy for monitoring new action-items? We think that most killer splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough Rails. The synergies factor is infinitely reconfigurable, best-of-breed. It seems wonderful, but it's realistic! Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and JavaScript.