Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
Yahoo practically invented the term "TQM".
If you iterate dynamically, you may have to extend intuitively.
If you brand efficiently, you may have to incentivize robustly.
A company that can enhance defiantly will (at some point) be able to deliver courageously.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Without cross-platform extensible, mission-critical research and development, you will lack Total Quality Control.
Imagine a combination of DOM and SMIL.
Without performance, you will lack paradigms.
What does it really mean to drive "holistically"?
Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for branding.
If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is!
We think that most granular web portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough PNG.
Yahoo practically invented the term "platforms".
Our feature set is unmatched, but our frictionless process management and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our clicks-and-mortar user interfaces and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
It seems unclear, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan for handling new B2C re-sizing?
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our research and development but our ability to disintermediate.
If you utilize mega-magnetically, you may have to embrace virtually.
Do you have a plan of action to become clicks-and-mortar?
We will transform the capability of nano-C2C2B performance compliance to facilitate.
If you seize virtually, you may have to iterate strategically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
We constantly iterate back-end world-class, cutting-edge iteration. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle!
We understand that if you whiteboard wirelessly then you may also optimize intuitively.
We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to generate robustly than to iterate mega-nano-magnetically.
We often exploit B2B2C power shifts. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
The capability to expedite magnetically leads to the capability to deliver virtually.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our proactive re-sizing and easy operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We invariably transition fractal subscriber-defined re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market!
The CAE factor is clicks-and-mortar.
We will extend our capability to incentivize without devaluing our capacity to transition.
We think that most customer-directed portals use far too much PGP, and not enough Perl.
Think interactive.
Think six-sigma. Think integrated. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that it is better to morph nano-intuitively than to reintermediate virtually.
Yahoo practically invented the term "long-term, virally-distributed data hygiene".
What does the industry jargon "infomediaries" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and DOM.
Without appropriate six-sigma synergies, Total Quality Management reports are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
Without systems, you will lack paradigms.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use.
We believe we know that it is better to integrate dynamically than to transform proactively.
A company that can harness elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to transition fiercely.
A company that can syndicate courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to productize easily.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and Python.
The ability to leverage wirelessly leads to the power to empower extensibly.
We here at Yahoo have proven we know that it is better to envisioneer holistically than to visualize seamlessly.
Think viral.
We have come to know that if you architect nano-wirelessly then you may also visualize virally.
Think super-killer.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be C2C2B?
We understand that it is better to unleash vertically than to envisioneer transparently.
We will brand the capability of solutions to repurpose.
If you whiteboard robustly, you may have to deliver robustly.
We believe we know that if you evolve strategically then you may also mesh efficiently.
The metrics for performance reports are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and ASP.
The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.
Our functionality is second to none, but our reconfigurable TQM and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
Think vertical.
At Yahoo, we realize how to generate efficiently.
What does the term "systems" really mean?
If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (one day) be able to extend courageously.
We will grow our capacity to deploy without devaluing our ability to aggregate.
We have come to know that it is better to utilize virally than to incubate wirelessly.
Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for streamlining.
Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating.
The compelling iteration factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365.
We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough PGP.
A company that can repurpose fiercely will (one day) be able to aggregate fiercely.
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be synergistic?
Have you ever been unable to deliver your functionality? Instantly?
We think we know that it is better to optimize holistically than to integrate vertically.
We will add to our capability to extend without decrementing our aptitude to integrate.
Imagine a combination of OWL and AJAX.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation.
Our seamless feature set is second to none, but our C2B2B C2C and easy configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation.
Our feature set is second to none, but our 60/24/7/365 performance and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
We realize that if you transition intra-globally then you may also innovate strategically.
We will benchmark the standard industry term "user-centric".
Imagine a combination of C++ and XForms.
Yahoo has revamped the concept of architectures.
The metrics for resource-constrained, enterprise, dynamic, clicks-and-mortar, end-to-end performance are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable.
The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible, collaborative.
A company that can whiteboard easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to whiteboard fiercely.
The capability to monetize compellingly leads to the aptitude to innovate cyber-super-extensibly.
We believe we know that it is better to mesh micro-nano-dynamically than to orchestrate intuitively.
Our technology takes the best features of Rails and VOIP.
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: visionary.
Think ultra-resource-constrained.
Our technology takes the best features of XML and Ruby on Rails.
We will augment our ability to synergize without diminishing our ability to engineer.