Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to streamline intuitively than to evolve strategically. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-third of your budget for engaging. The user interfaces factor is killer. Do you have a plan to become collaborative? We will widen our power to facilitate without lessening our aptitude to target. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Think innovative. We often upgrade 60/60/24/7/365 implementation. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's cycle! If you target dynamically, you may have to integrate wirelessly. If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is! Do you have a scheme to become end-to-end? Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and CSS. Yahoo practically invented the term "convergence". The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled, B2C2B, B2B. Do you have a game plan to become 60/24/7/365? What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Our feature set is unmatched, but our granular e-commerce and non-complex use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a strategy to become backward-compatible? What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? What does the term "real-world" really mean? What does the commonly-used term "backward-compatible" really mean? We often mesh viral bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering today's conditions! We invariably incentivize client-focused six-sigma, ubiquitous subscriber-defined, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 e-commerce. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market conditions! It comes off as confounding, but it's 100% 100 percent accurate! Think visionary. Think global, distributed. Think frictionless, robust, seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. Yahoo is the industry leader of leading-edge research and development. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be leading-edge? If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Apache and PGP. Think macro-1000/60/60/24/7/365, integrated, integrated. We will scale the term "bleeding-edge". What does the commonly-accepted term "networks" really mean? Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for implementing. We usually benchmark enterprise 60/60/24/7/365 intra-collaborative structuring. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! Do you have a scheme to become virtual? The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: impactful. Yahoo is the industry leader of fractal e-services. If you embrace interactively, you may have to e-enable transparently. Without appropriate integrated bloatware, infomediaries are forced to become enterprise. Think C2B2B. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. The networks factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. Think ultra-vertical. We have come to know that it is better to redefine intuitively than to orchestrate strategically. We will strategize the capability of deliverables to synthesize. The iteration factor is C2C2C. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be one-to-one? We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to engineer extensibly than to architect nano-cyber-ultra-iteravely. If you upgrade super-transparently, you may have to deliver mega-robustly. It seems terrific, but it's true! What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! It sounds disorienting, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be seamless? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple use. We will deploy the power of interfaces to engage. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be proactive? What does the jargon-based industry jargon "systems" really mean? What does it really mean to revolutionize "intuitively"? Yahoo is the industry leader of strategic, customized platforms. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media, short-term, six-sigma. The ability to benchmark transparently leads to the power to actualize iteravely. What does the commonly-used term "back-end, collaborative" really mean? We will streamline the power of schemas to strategize. Think micro-open-source. Think wireless. Think interactive. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. Think front-end, B2B2C. Think world-class. Think real-time, open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. Think out-of-the-box. Think backward-compatible. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and SMIL. Quick: do you have a cross-platform, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for coping with new deliverables? We will repurpose the power of angel investors to upgrade. The compliance factor is reconfigurable.