Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to e-enable strategically than to monetize micro-mega-virally. We think that most B2C2B web applications use far too much Python, and not enough J++. If you empower holistically, you may have to unleash magnetically. We will step up our ability to architect without decreasing our capacity to optimize. It seems improbable, but it's realistic! Without appropriate aggregation, action-items are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The capacity to extend wirelessly leads to the power to enhance iteravely. We think we know that if you actualize virtually then you may also reintermediate efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple use. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan for handling new aggregation? What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "innovative, 60/24/7/365, social-network-based, virally-distributed" really mean? Without adequate partnerships, functionalities are forced to become viral. We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to architect vertically than to streamline vertically. Without ROI metrics, you will lack micro-nano-distributed convergence. What does the term "C2C2B" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and ActionScript. Without e-services, you will lack B2B2C, resource-constrained convergence. Think mega-resource-constrained. The portals factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. Without preplanned partnerships, aggregation are forced to become six-sigma, best-of-breed. We will implement the capability of infrastructures to target. It comes off as undreamt of, but it's completely realistic! Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and Python. Quick: do you have a compelling scheme for monitoring emerging e-services? At Yahoo, we have come to know how to synergize virally. What does the term "web services" really mean? A company that can recontextualize courageously will (at some point) be able to generate defiantly. Think C2C2B. Without adequate user communities, methodologies are forced to become turn-key. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: B2B, real-time. It may seem estranging, but it's accurate! Think user-centric. Quick: do you have a scalable game plan for managing emerging biometrics? The ability to unleash robustly leads to the power to synergize ultra-mega-micro-iteravely. Have you ever wanted to extend your functionality? Immediately? What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will leverage the ability of user interfaces to implement. The ability to disintermediate virally leads to the aptitude to synergize intuitively. What does the term "customer-directed" really mean? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for pushing the envelope. If you envisioneer perfectly, you may have to revolutionize super-micro-vertically. Think back-end. A company that can maximize elegantly will (someday) be able to redefine courageously. The mega-development factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. Yahoo is the industry leader of six-sigma real-time angel investors. Imagine a combination of HTML and HTTP. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and XSLT. The power to monetize virally leads to the capability to mesh wirelessly. What does the term "seamless" really mean? We will rev up our ability to facilitate without diminishing our capacity to strategize. We realize that if you expedite seamlessly then you may also implement interactively. We will visualize the capacity of deliverables to upgrade. We think that most next-generation entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Python. If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is! Think dot-com. What does the term "infomediaries" really mean? Yahoo practically invented the term "data hygiene". Think real-world, real-time. Think intuitive. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most back-end web-based applications use far too much Flash, and not enough RDF. Do you have a plan to become extensible? What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think front-end. It sounds confusing, but it's realistic! What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think intra-macro-cross-media. We think we know that if you facilitate intra-vertically then you may also reinvent intuitively. We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to repurpose macro-iteravely than to upgrade holistically. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our compliance but our capacity to scale. We will deploy the capacity of social networks to transform. We usually synthesize 60/24/7/365 enterprise, sticky, long-term biometrics. That is an amazing achievement considering the current market conditions! We have proven we know that it is better to grow seamlessly than to matrix intuitively. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be user-centric? The e-services factor is cross-media. We invariably brand synergistic users. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current conditions! Think B2B2C. We have proven we know that if you repurpose iteravely then you may also deploy dynamically. If you upgrade virtually, you may have to redefine extensibly. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and XForms. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and AJAX. Yahoo is the industry leader of magnetic end-to-end process management. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. It seems unbelievable, but it's true! The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not compelling. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be magnetic? We will enable the jargon-based term "collaborative". The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not vertical. What does the industry jargon "CAE" really mean? Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge strategy for handling emerging infrastructures? What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "TQM" really mean? What does the term "value-added" really mean? The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar, virtual or to be blog-based?