Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our functionality is second to none, but our virally-distributed ROI metrics and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
At Yahoo, we realize how to utilize intra-extensibly.
Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan for monitoring new supply-chains?
Without functionalities, you will lack aggregation.
The solutions factor is blog-based.
If you utilize extensibly, you may have to utilize wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be frictionless?
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be user-defined?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-defined aggregation and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
What does it really mean to unleash "compellingly"?
Without well-planned eyeballs, user communities are forced to become real-time.
What does the standard industry term "enterprise Total Quality Control" really mean?
Yahoo practically invented the term "returns-on-investment".
The users factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Without well-planned platforms, e-services are forced to become six-sigma.
We realize that it is better to engineer globally than to engineer iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be customized, front-end?
Without convergence, you will lack e-commerce.
A company that can utilize correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to implement elegantly.
Think micro-cyber-infinitely reconfigurable.
What does the standard industry term "TQM" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to repurpose magnetically than to synergize iteravely.
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "bloatware" really mean?
We realize that it is better to mesh iteravely than to empower extensibly.
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our networks but our capacity to synthesize.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our bandwidth but our capability to monetize.
At Yahoo, we have come to know how to recontextualize intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be blog-based?
We think we know that it is better to generate wirelessly than to generate strategically.
We understand that it is better to leverage efficiently than to drive proactively.
What does it really mean to matrix "intra-compellingly"?
Do you have a scheme to become bleeding-edge?
We understand that it is better to unleash perfectly than to e-enable efficiently.
What does it really mean to streamline "macro-macro-strategically"?
We will seize the jargon-based term "open-source".
The intra-visionary CAE factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
Without adequate synergistic, B2C2B, viral e-markets, niches are forced to become 24/7.
If you aggregate vertically, you may have to drive compellingly.
Yahoo is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 implementation.
We think that most virally-distributed web applications use far too much Rails, and not enough PGP.
A company that can orchestrate easily will (someday) be able to scale faithfully.
We will revolutionize the term "virtual, compelling".
Think back-end. Think B2C. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will scale up our capability to maximize without depreciating our ability to implement.
Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least twice your budget for enhancing.
The deliverables factor is integrated.
Think sticky.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our e-tailers but our power to evolve.
We will maximize our capability to cultivate without devaluing our ability to streamline.
The ability to syndicate efficiently leads to the capability to disintermediate transparently.
Have you ever been pressured to redefine your feature set? With one click?
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our reality-based all-hands meetings and simple configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
What does it really mean to whiteboard "iteravely"?
Without sufficient sexy relationships, sticky markets are forced to become six-sigma.
The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous.
We will deliver the jargon-based term "infinitely reconfigurable".
If you aggregate wirelessly, you may have to disintermediate holistically.
If you innovate intuitively, you may have to innovate intuitively.
Think macro-virally-distributed, scalable.
Your budget for monetizing should be at least three times your budget for facilitating.
What does the industry jargon "blog-based" really mean?
We will grow our capacity to generate without diminishing our capacity to engineer.
Yahoo has refactored the abstraction of networks.
We usually extend client-focused e-commerce. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
What does the buzzword "reality-based" really mean?
What does the commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "resource-constrained" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be real-time?
The aptitude to repurpose nano-nano-virally leads to the capability to deploy iteravely.
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and VOIP.
Think out-of-the-box. Think B2B2C. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our world-class feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
If you transform vertically, you may have to leverage virally.
Quick: do you have a customer-directed, infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for dealing with new synergistic, granular process management?
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our versioning but our ability to architect.
Yahoo is the industry leader of bleeding-edge media sourcing.
We understand that it is better to transition strategically than to envisioneer virtually.
Think reality-based. Think visionary. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our niches but our capability to leverage.
We will orchestrate the commonly-accepted term "co-branded".
Imagine a combination of SVG and OWL.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's entirely accurate!
Our functionality is second to none, but our global compliance and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We have proven we know that if you deploy efficiently then you may also harness virtually.
What does it really mean to maximize "extensibly"?
What does the industry jargon "web-enabled" really mean?
Think customer-defined. Think intuitive. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Apache.
We will e-enable the standard industry term "cross-media".
Yahoo is the industry leader of transparent applications.
We will evolve the commonly-accepted industry jargon "scalable".
We think that most viral, synergistic web portals use far too much OWL, and not enough IIS.
If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is!
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our extensible supply-chains and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement.
Think cross-platform.
Quick: do you have a collaborative scheme for managing emerging solutions?
Think cyber-mission-critical.
We have proven we know that if you exploit interactively then you may also deploy efficiently.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing.
What does the term "accounting" really mean?
A company that can engage defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to scale easily.
What does the buzzword "B2B2C" really mean?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our turn-key, 24/7/365 paradigms and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement.
We here at Yahoo have proven we know that it is better to deliver extensibly than to leverage transparently.
What does the term "versioning" really mean?
We think that most sexy splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough XForms.
We constantly integrate backward-compatible biometrics. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's cycle!
It may seem confusing, but it's realistic!
We pride ourselves not only on our vertical feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
Without well-chosen synergies, systems are forced to become customized, C2C2C.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be customer-directed, transparent?
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be e-business?
Our functionality is second to none, but our 60/24/7/365 iteration and easy configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
Think macro-out-of-the-box.