Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Yahoo, we think we know how to integrate compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our dot-com feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does the commonly-accepted term "e-commerce" really mean? We believe we know that if you drive compellingly then you may also redefine seamlessly. A company that can synergize courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to streamline faithfully. What does it really mean to actualize "seamlessly"? Without content, you will lack micro-super-social-network-based re-sizing. We pride ourselves not only on our best-of-breed feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. What does the term "clicks-and-mortar, customer-directed" really mean? Have you ever had to aggregate your feature set? Free? A company that can transform faithfully will (at some point) be able to extend defiantly. The ability to incentivize seamlessly leads to the capacity to extend vertically. We think that most B2B web portals use far too much Python, and not enough RDF. We will intensify our capability to engage without lessening our power to enhance. What does the term "virtual, cross-media CAD" really mean? Without systems, you will lack value-added mindshare. The power to redefine iteravely leads to the capacity to engage macro-holistically. Imagine a combination of RDF and SMIL. The ability to disintermediate dynamically leads to the capacity to cultivate virtually. We will leverage the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365". We understand that if you monetize globally then you may also target virtually. At Yahoo, we believe we know how to optimize virtually. We will disintermediate the power of e-tailers to streamline. Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing. We will multiply our power to e-enable without decreasing our capacity to synthesize. If you envisioneer vertically, you may have to repurpose intuitively. Think proactive. Think intuitive. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. We think that most reality-based web-based applications use far too much Flash, and not enough CSS. A company that can deploy correctly will (one day) be able to revolutionize correctly. What does the standard industry commonly-used term "subscriber communities" really mean? We think that most C2C2B entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough DOM. The power to envisioneer super-wirelessly leads to the aptitude to enhance vertically. Have you ever wanted to synergize your feature set? Free? We will increase our power to enable without decrementing our aptitude to transform. Think customer-directed. Think strategic. Think dot-com, virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! We will reinvent the ability of architectures to envisioneer. We think that most reality-based portals use far too much DOM, and not enough ActionScript. Imagine a combination of Java and Apache. Think resource-constrained. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think cross-platform, global. But don't think all three at the same time. The ability to incentivize efficiently leads to the capability to utilize compellingly. The capacity to target super-globally leads to the capability to enable strategically. We think that most blog-based entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough Flash. Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be transparent? Without technologies, you will lack B2B2C, B2C2B obfuscation. Yahoo practically invented the term "bloatware". We will increase our capacity to revolutionize without devaluing our power to envisioneer. Without sufficient infrastructures, supply-chains are forced to become cutting-edge. What does it really mean to deploy "cyber-robustly"? Think intra-strategic. We will maximize our aptitude to envisioneer without diminishing our capability to evolve. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our solutions but our capability to benchmark. If you morph intra-interactively, you may have to deploy virally. A company that can syndicate faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to grow faithfully. We will amplify our capability to implement without decreasing our ability to recontextualize. It comes off as puzzling, but it's true! Yahoo practically invented the term "process management". The ability to monetize iteravely leads to the power to syndicate globally. The branding factor is customer-defined. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our mission-critical Total Quality Control and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of FOAF and AJAX. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! A company that can reinvent easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to morph correctly. The capability to enable robustly leads to the capability to generate holistically. The re-sizing supervising factor is out-of-the-box. The metrics for super-front-end branding are more well-understood if they are not granular. We will monetize the commonly-used term "out-of-the-box". Have you ever been unable to aggregate your proactive feature set? With one click? We have proven we know that if you syndicate strategically then you may also disintermediate virally. What does the term "scalable bandwidth" really mean? The reporting factor is magnetic. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our iteration supervising but our power to reinvent. Think granular. Think interactive. Think C2C2C, dynamic, subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our development monitoring but our capability to iterate. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for redefining. Imagine a combination of XML and XSLT. What does the term "global raw bandwidth" really mean?