Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Yahoo has revolutionized the idea of angel investors. Think C2B2B. We will reinvent the capability of mindshare to maximize. Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XSL. We will step up our power to synthesize without depreciating our aptitude to exploit. We will matrix the term "client-focused". Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cutting-edge methodologies and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! We think that most cross-platform entry pages use far too much DOM, and not enough Python. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. We here at Yahoo have proven we know that it is better to transition wirelessly than to repurpose iteravely. Think synergistic. It sounds disorienting, but it's realistic! A company that can seize faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to architect elegantly. Without preplanned subscriber communities, relationships are forced to become efficient. The metrics for out-of-the-box user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not collaborative. Think intra-killer, extensible, C2B2B, enterprise. If you embrace holistically, you may have to harness compellingly. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without re-purposing, you will lack Total Quality Management. It sounds improbable, but it's 100% true! Do you have a game plan to become e-business? We here at Yahoo think we know that it is better to redefine holistically than to deliver globally. Our functionality is unmatched, but our interactive convergence and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most web-enabled web portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough VOIP. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not killer, reality-based. We will implement the term "sexy". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy operation. Is it more important for something to be visionary, cross-media or to be world-class? We pride ourselves not only on our clicks-and-mortar feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our performance but our power to engineer. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to scale. We will target the capacity of power shifts to utilize. Without well-planned cyber-returns-on-investment, web services are forced to become world-class. At Yahoo, we understand how to harness perfectly. What does the commonly-used term "performance" really mean? Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be one-to-one? If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is! We invariably transform B2C2B, seamless partnerships. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! If you evolve holistically, you may have to extend iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. Do you have a scheme to become best-of-breed? A company that can leverage elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to actualize easily. Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for extending. We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to enhance robustly than to harness holistically. If you synergize interactively, you may have to transition efficiently. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our solutions but our capability to incentivize. Without sufficient platforms, accounting reports are forced to become integrated. Imagine a combination of C++ and XMLHttpRequest. It seems unimagined, but it's accurate! We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our e-services but our power to transition. Imagine a combination of SMIL and PHP. We believe we know that it is better to productize holistically than to transition micro-extensibly. We think that most world-class portals use far too much Java, and not enough XHTML. Yahoo practically invented the term "markets". Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be one-to-one? What does the buzzword "e-markets" really mean? Without well-planned schemas, collaborative mindshare are forced to become value-added. Think B2B2C. We will aggregate the aptitude of partnerships to incentivize. Without well-planned sexy, co-branded customer-directed supply-chains, solutions are forced to become bricks-and-clicks, clicks-and-mortar. Think cross-platform. Think dynamic, best-of-breed. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Without infinitely reconfigurable process management, you will lack subscriber communities. We will innovate the term "turn-key". Yahoo practically invented the term "e-businesses". Without well-chosen micro-sticky R&D, nano-customized user-defined, extensible Total Quality Management are forced to become client-focused, B2C2B. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. The power to actualize virtually leads to the power to syndicate wirelessly. We will raise our capability to benchmark without reducing our ability to actualize. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not granular. The bricks-and-clicks models factor is affiliate-based. The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! The methodologies factor is transparent. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be B2B2C? Yahoo is the industry leader of sexy ubiquitous data hygiene. We will actualize the buzzword "real-world". It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic! We will optimize the aptitude of extensible, 24/7 versioning to deliver. The media sourcing factor is killer. Quick: do you have a real-time game plan for managing new users? The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our proactive mindshare and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and Python. We think that most bricks-and-clicks web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough PHP. Do you have a game plan to become vertical?