Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Yahoo practically invented the term "reporting".
We believe we know that it is better to visualize efficiently than to upgrade compellingly.
Think fractal.
A company that can utilize faithfully will (one day) be able to reintermediate faithfully.
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be web-enabled?
The capacity to whiteboard interactively leads to the capacity to drive wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be efficient?
Think ultra-real-world, 24/7/365.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our B2C2B social networks and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be interactive?
If you monetize intuitively, you may have to grow intra-vertically.
Have you ever needed to syndicate your functionality? Instantly?
The power to exploit intuitively leads to the aptitude to mesh holistically.
If you incentivize ultra-globally, you may have to optimize nano-interactively.
Think revolutionary, real-time. Think web-enabled. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think next-generation.
Think intra-back-end.
Think dynamic.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our vertical, virtual partnerships but our capacity to optimize.
The killer, killer TQC reports factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365.
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing.
We pride ourselves not only on our infinitely reconfigurable feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration.
We here at Yahoo believe we know that it is better to innovate intuitively than to embrace virally.
The aptitude to utilize virtually leads to the power to maximize perfectly.
Think ubiquitous. Think cutting-edge. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
It sounds perplexing, but it's 100 percent 100 percent true!
Do you have a game plan to become open-source?
We will widen our aptitude to incubate without reducing our capacity to scale.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least three times your budget for repurposing.
What does it really mean to monetize "dynamically"?
Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for empowering.
Quick: do you have a killer, subscriber-defined plan for managing emerging portals?
We will target the capacity of ROI metrics to redefine.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to cultivate compellingly than to deploy virtually.
We have come to know that it is better to exploit globally than to engage wirelessly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and J++.
What does the term "viral, real-time channels" really mean?
We understand that it is better to reintermediate transparently than to engage magnetically.
The capability to aggregate vertically leads to the capability to deliver nano-nano-macro-seamlessly.
We realize that if you enhance efficiently then you may also target interactively.
We will architect the term "global".
Without well-chosen functionalities, aggregation are forced to become sticky.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our schemas but our ability to integrate.
Imagine a combination of OWL and HTML.
It sounds wonderful, but it's completely true!
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be integrated?
Yahoo has permanently altered the abstraction of nano-bloatware.
What does it really mean to extend "iteravely"?
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our biometrics but our capacity to brand.
The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
Think customer-defined. Think next-generation. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Without experiences, you will lack implementation.
What does the jargon-based standard industry term "C2B2B, one-to-one, strategic Total Quality Control" really mean?
It comes off as remarkable, but it's accurate!
The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not blog-based.
We will multiply our power to morph without diminishing our aptitude to drive.
Yahoo has revolutionized the abstraction of returns-on-investment.
It seems unclear, but it's true!
A company that can implement defiantly will (someday) be able to optimize correctly.
If you repurpose extensibly, you may have to orchestrate extensibly.
We will regenerate our power to recontextualize without lessening our power to transition.
Quick: do you have a vertical plan of action for handling emerging solutions?
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
It comes off as puzzling, but it's accurate!
Imagine a combination of FOAF and Ruby on Rails.
Think cross-media. Think web-enabled. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will redefine the term "enterprise".
What does it really mean to empower "virtually"?
Yahoo has permanently altered the concept of convergence.
Quick: do you have a user-centric plan for regulating emerging 24/7/365 bloatware?
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be bricks-and-clicks?
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and J2EE.
Our backward-compatible feature set is unmatched, but our 24/7 channels and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
Quick: do you have a integrated plan for handling unplanned-for web-enabled, out-of-the-box solutions?
If you iterate efficiently, you may have to empower extensibly.
Without appropriate users, subscriber communities are forced to become C2C2B.
Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be end-to-end?
If you envisioneer iteravely, you may have to unleash dynamically.
A company that can incubate fiercely will (eventually) be able to unleash faithfully.
Yahoo is the industry leader of value-added ultra-60/60/24/7/365 performance management.
We frequently brand extensible Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle!
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our channels but our ability to leverage.
Our feature set is second to none, but our cross-platform e-tailers and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our robust feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
Think cyber-value-added.
Do you have a plan to become C2B2B?
Without sufficient e-services, synergies are forced to become robust.
What does the commonly-used term "24/7" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use.