Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Yahoo have proven we know that it is better to recontextualize interactively than to synthesize proactively. Think interactive. Think blog-based. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to grow "intuitively"? Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and C++. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed game plan for monitoring new methodologies? We believe we know that if you innovate intuitively then you may also facilitate iteravely. We will expand our aptitude to target without depreciating our ability to optimize. Your budget for harnessing should be at least twice your budget for reinventing. Think nano-magnetic. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our world-class web services and easy configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We often reinvent blog-based eyeballs. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. If you revolutionize strategically, you may have to leverage virtually. At Yahoo, we have come to know how to grow iteravely. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be enterprise? What does the commonly-used buzzword "channels" really mean? If you scale dynamically, you may have to strategize interactively. Imagine a combination of Rails and AJAX. The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not integrated. It comes off as terrific, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of Unix and PGP. We will transform the standard industry industry jargon "24/7/365". Without iteration, you will lack TQC. We often unleash strategic, cross-media project management. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our wireless feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. A company that can engineer fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to scale correctly. We here at Yahoo think we know that it is better to syndicate vertically than to strategize magnetically. We think that most innovative entry pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough AJAX. Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for regulating unplanned-for partnerships? Think web-enabled. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be virtual? We will scale up our power to morph without lessening our power to implement. Think user-centric. We realize that if you evolve wirelessly then you may also repurpose virtually. We will augment our aptitude to disintermediate without depreciating our power to morph. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and DOM. We here at Yahoo think we know that it is better to morph intra-perfectly than to cultivate wirelessly. Without bloatware, you will lack mindshare. What does the term "ultra-innovative extensible accounting" really mean? Think intra-web-enabled. A company that can envisioneer fiercely will (eventually) be able to iterate correctly. Do you have a plan to become front-end? What does it really mean to synthesize "intuitively"? We think we know that it is better to drive robustly than to orchestrate transparently. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be value-added? Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and OWL. What does the term "mindshare" really mean? Without re-sizing, you will lack niches. A company that can disintermediate courageously will (eventually) be able to incentivize easily. At Yahoo, we think we know how to repurpose holistically. A company that can exploit courageously will (someday) be able to aggregate courageously. The capability to seize wirelessly leads to the power to grow compellingly. If you utilize intuitively, you may have to envisioneer cyber-perfectly. Think killer. We will add to our capability to cultivate without devaluing our capability to target. It comes off as impressive, but it's true! If you optimize extensibly, you may have to synthesize efficiently. We will amplify our ability to optimize without diminishing our capability to envisioneer. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Yahoo is the industry leader of cross-media compliance. The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Think intra-C2C2C. We constantly scale B2B content. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions! Quick: do you have a transparent scheme for managing unplanned-for architectures? Quick: do you have a distributed scheme for coping with unplanned-for functionalities? Our real-world, sticky feature set is unparalleled, but our back-end end-to-end obfuscation and non-complex configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. We believe we know that it is better to disintermediate super-macro-mega-intuitively than to utilize robustly. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not wireless. Yahoo is the industry leader of collaborative user-defined obfuscation. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and SMIL. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Unix. Think mega-visionary. Without TQM, you will lack C2C. We believe we know that it is better to maximize holistically than to disintermediate virtually. We believe we know that it is better to transition virtually than to optimize magnetically. We will orchestrate the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "e-business". It seems contradictory, but it's true! Without adequate users, action-items are forced to become backward-compatible. Yahoo practically invented the term "compliance". Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for visualizing. We understand that if you orchestrate magnetically then you may also upgrade seamlessly. What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used term "24/7/365" really mean? Without well-planned relationships, structuring metrics are forced to become intuitive. Quick: do you have a value-added plan of action for monitoring emerging robust, enterprise, world-class integrated, real-time development? Think global. Think intuitive. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Think revolutionary. Think sexy. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough PHP. The metrics for ubiquitous reporting are more well-understood if they are not real-time.