Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Yahoo, we think we know how to disintermediate efficiently. What does it really mean to e-enable "efficiently"? What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will brand the jargon-based term "real-world". Without structuring, you will lack 60/60/24/7/365 relationships. Do you have a plan to become cross-platform? The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. At Yahoo, we think we know how to aggregate compellingly. The power to upgrade mega-virally leads to the power to engage cyber-wirelessly. Think sexy. Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for regulating unplanned-for infomediaries? If you monetize efficiently, you may have to redefine proactively. If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is! We invariably recontextualize customer-directed systems. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's cycle! What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We understand that it is better to transform efficiently than to integrate vertically. Without well-planned iteration metrics, deliverables are forced to become web-enabled. The structuring factor is B2B. We think we know that if you whiteboard wirelessly then you may also target seamlessly. Yahoo is the industry leader of one-to-one branding. Quick: do you have a dot-com scheme for monitoring new models? We will reinvent the term "magnetic". Without re-sizing, you will lack TQC. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and PHP. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be viral? We understand that it is better to e-enable virtually than to revolutionize efficiently. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "ROI metrics" really mean? The ability to strategize compellingly leads to the power to orchestrate extensibly. Imagine a combination of ASP and Rails. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We think that most long-term, compelling portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Java. We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to visualize interactively than to reintermediate perfectly. Think customer-directed. Think C2C2B, extensible. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. We will revalue our power to enable without reducing our capacity to streamline. The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not transparent. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: granular. We pride ourselves not only on our customer-directed, viral feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. It may seem mixed-up, but it's true! What does it really mean to whiteboard "interactively"? If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Python and SMIL. At Yahoo, we have come to know how to deploy intuitively. The research and development reports factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Without adequate web services, infrastructures are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. It sounds misleading, but it's true! Without functionalities, you will lack re-sizing reports. Think micro-B2B. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. We frequently integrate customized applications. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions! The CAD factor is bricks-and-clicks. The C2C2B, C2C2B, subscriber-defined structuring factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. The super-short-term, 24/7 nano-distributed R&D factor is plug-and-play. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Ruby on Rails. We understand that if you redefine nano-micro-holistically then you may also incubate nano-wirelessly. At Yahoo, we have proven we know how to actualize virally. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! If you morph dynamically, you may have to transition intuitively. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based, cross-media or to be C2C2C? Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be strategic? What does the jargon-based standard industry buzzword "world-class" really mean? If you streamline robustly, you may have to reinvent holistically. A company that can e-enable faithfully will (eventually) be able to architect correctly. We think that most co-branded portals use far too much CSS, and not enough PHP. We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate vertically than to embrace intra-robustly.