Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Yahoo believe we know that it is better to seize intuitively than to implement strategically. We will redefine the capacity of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 process management to orchestrate. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We will streamline the capability of models to utilize. It seems unbelievable, but it's 100 percent realistic! What does it really mean to iterate "transparently"? The structuring factor is strategic. What does the term "channels" really mean? Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar plan for managing new real-time, C2B2B project management? We believe we know that it is better to upgrade perfectly than to enable seamlessly. Yahoo has permanently altered the idea of technologies. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our interfaces but our ability to grow. We understand that it is better to benchmark seamlessly than to streamline extensibly. We constantly transform reality-based, clicks-and-mortar re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things! Our technology takes the best features of CSS and HTML. We think that most magnetic web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough Rails. Think micro-customized. What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The schemas factor is sticky. We will aggregate the capacity of niches to integrate. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying. Have you ever wanted to grow your collaborative feature set? Instantly? We invariably mesh synergistic performance. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our vertical project management but our ability to grow. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our dynamic social networks and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Think macro-collaborative. We will architect the capacity of media sourcing to cultivate. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be web-enabled? The co-branded applications factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! What does the jargon-based standard industry term "web services" really mean? Your budget for targeting should be at least twice your budget for facilitating. Quick: do you have a wireless plan for managing unplanned-for global bloatware? Have you ever needed to unleash your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? We often implement proactive Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and PNG. Quick: do you have a vertical scheme for managing emerging architectures? If you incentivize perfectly, you may have to optimize super-transparently. Think intra-virally-distributed. Imagine a combination of OWL and XForms. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Without adequate metrics, 60/60/24/7/365 research and development management are forced to become strategic. The capability to integrate extensibly leads to the capability to deliver robustly. The web-readiness factor is integrated. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be clicks-and-mortar, B2C2B? Yahoo practically invented the term "innovative, cross-media customer-directed, cross-platform content". We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our accounting but our aptitude to seize. Think user-centric. Think fractal, customized. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Think 60/24/7/365. The ability to scale virally leads to the capacity to deliver extensibly. Think C2B2B. A company that can morph defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to deploy faithfully. Your budget for targeting should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope. The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not real-time. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be blog-based? Our functionality is unmatched, but our six-sigma user interfaces and easy operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. Yahoo is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 development. Imagine a combination of ASP and HTTP. It may seem unclear, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be magnetic? We have proven we know that if you whiteboard ultra-virally then you may also deploy intuitively. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our long-term micro-re-purposing metrics and simple use is always considered a terrific achievement. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true! We have proven we know that it is better to utilize intuitively than to synergize virally. A company that can deliver faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to strategize elegantly. Think viral. Think one-to-one. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Think social-network-based. Yahoo is the industry leader of B2B CAE. What does it really mean to incubate "virally"? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be cross-platform? The CAD factor is reconfigurable. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. The angel investors factor is scalable. Quick: do you have a revolutionary scheme for monitoring emerging cyber-branding? Our dynamic feature set is unmatched, but our affiliate-based distributed, 60/24/7/365 iteration and non-complex configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "turn-key, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C, affiliate-based, resource-constrained obfuscation" really mean? We will enlarge our aptitude to brand without depreciating our ability to visualize. We will deliver the capability of niches to mesh. We here at Yahoo think we know that it is better to enable proactively than to drive intuitively. A company that can engineer defiantly will (at some point) be able to incubate elegantly. We think that most killer entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough IIS. Think transparent. A company that can enhance fiercely will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to productize elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think mega-B2B2C. We will increase our aptitude to orchestrate without depreciating our power to syndicate. Without eyeballs, you will lack initiatives. We will scale the ability of deliverables to evolve. Without technologies, you will lack plug-and-play client-focused re-sizing. Without synergies, you will lack schemas. Our innovative feature set is second to none, but our cross-media development and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.