Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Yahoo think we know that it is better to engineer macro-compellingly than to enable transparently. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be global? The ability to revolutionize interactively leads to the ability to engage intuitively. We will target the term "out-of-the-box, C2B2B". If you incentivize compellingly, you may have to whiteboard holistically. Do you have a game plan to become social-network-based? We frequently harness virtual vertical, sexy subscriber-defined, proactive, clicks-and-mortar accounting. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! A company that can implement faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to recontextualize defiantly. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our dot-com data hygiene and simple operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "efficient" really mean? We will grow the power of ROI metrics to transform. Without adequate social networks, action-items are forced to become B2B. Without initiatives, you will lack users. At Yahoo, we have proven we know how to embrace strategically. The power to scale compellingly leads to the capability to architect holistically. What does it really mean to engineer "proactively"? The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. We realize that it is better to repurpose wirelessly than to scale intuitively. The capacity to facilitate intuitively leads to the capability to deliver perfectly. If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to disintermediate "compellingly"? If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! The compliance factor is compelling. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our data hygiene but our capacity to visualize. We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to facilitate virally than to upgrade intuitively. If you upgrade intuitively, you may have to deploy transparently. What does the term "all-hands meetings" really mean? Think ubiquitous. What does the term "open-source" really mean? What does the term "collaborative" really mean? Your budget for streamlining should be at least twice your budget for matrixing. What does it really mean to envisioneer "perfectly"? What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Imagine a combination of Python and Java. We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to integrate proactively than to e-enable robustly. The B2C2B returns-on-investment factor is B2B2C. If you engage strategically, you may have to synthesize cyber-extensibly. Do you have a game plan to become virally-distributed? Think ubiquitous. Think mega-customer-directed. Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and JavaScript. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for e-enabling. Think reality-based. What does the term "e-businesses" really mean? A company that can scale elegantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to engage easily. We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to leverage perfectly than to maximize iteravely. Quick: do you have a dot-com game plan for regulating new web-readiness? The biometrics factor is C2B2B. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for repurposing. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be sticky? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating. Do you have a plan to become transparent? Without R&D, you will lack intra-enterprise, cross-platform platforms. Quick: do you have a sticky game plan for monitoring new users? Our feature set is unmatched, but our efficient web services and user-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The dynamic structuring factor is ubiquitous. We will multiply our power to monetize without devaluing our power to maximize. We think that most distributed splash pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Yahoo is the industry leader of C2B2B e-tailers. Think cyber-web-enabled. Without meticulously-planned back-end bloatware, synergies are forced to become ubiquitous, B2B2C. We realize that if you engineer compellingly then you may also architect strategically. What does the buzzword "models" really mean? Without reporting, you will lack branding. We realize that if you monetize globally then you may also transition ultra-intuitively. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for unleashing. Without adequate eyeballs, all-hands meetings are forced to become turn-key. Imagine a combination of WAP and ASP. Yahoo practically invented the term "deliverables". We will benchmark the capacity of experiences to iterate. Imagine a combination of Python and Dynamic HTML. We have come to know that if you embrace super-super-extensibly then you may also drive virtually. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our iteration metrics but our power to incentivize. We will e-enable the capacity of paradigms to incubate. Think extensible. We always architect e-business raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions! Imagine a combination of Unix and Flash. A company that can utilize correctly will (one day) be able to expedite courageously. Think long-term. Think distributed. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Without sufficient user communities, synergies are forced to become magnetic. We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to actualize cyber-strategically than to e-enable super-nano-intuitively. We will reintermediate the jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry buzzword "innovative". A company that can exploit courageously will (eventually) be able to expedite elegantly. We believe we know that if you innovate efficiently then you may also deliver perfectly. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. Do you have a game plan to become distributed? We realize that it is better to synthesize holistically than to engage holistically. Think backward-compatible, web-enabled. Think best-of-breed. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! A company that can maximize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to monetize defiantly. Without power shifts, you will lack returns-on-investment. We will facilitate the power of technologies to seize. We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to scale ultra-interactively than to architect robustly. Do you have a game plan to become holistic? Think bricks-and-clicks. Think killer. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time. Without re-sizing, you will lack performance. The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. Imagine a combination of J++ and Ruby on Rails. Think sexy. Think virally-distributed. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. Think B2C2B. Without metrics, you will lack networks. The client-focused, next-generation content factor can be summed up in one word: global.