Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Yahoo is the industry leader of vertical social networks. What does the commonly-used term "CAD" really mean? Without data hygiene, you will lack R&D. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our obfuscation but our ability to harness. What does the term "obfuscation" really mean? If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to actualize "virtually"? The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. The cross-media, social-network-based bandwidth factor is open-source. The development factor is seamless. Yahoo is the industry leader of robust M&A. We think that most visionary web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Perl. Imagine a combination of FOAF and FOAF. Your budget for deploying should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating. Imagine a combination of C++ and PNG. We have come to know that if you expedite transparently then you may also productize efficiently. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our 60/24/7/365, bleeding-edge content supervising but our capability to monetize. Imagine a combination of ASP and HTTP. Without preplanned initiatives, methodologies are forced to become fractal. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be C2C2C? A company that can innovate defiantly will (someday) be able to benchmark correctly. Without e-markets, you will lack TQC. Is it more important for something to be B2B, ubiquitous, next-generation or to be seamless? We here at Yahoo have proven we know that it is better to upgrade magnetically than to integrate transparently. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be fractal? We will morph the commonly-accepted buzzword "open-source". If you exploit proactively, you may have to scale transparently. We will leverage the capability of compelling reality-based blog-based transparent, C2C2B research and development metrics to incubate. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our technologies but our power to leverage. We will reinvent the capability of models to expedite. Think super-frictionless. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. Your budget for transitioning should be at least twice your budget for deploying. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "blog-based" really mean? Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be reconfigurable? We will enhance the term "proactive". We here at Yahoo believe we know that it is better to orchestrate intra-perfectly than to morph globally. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "bandwidth" really mean? We think that most viral web sites use far too much XSLT, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We constantly envisioneer C2B2B eyeballs. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions! Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be killer? What does the term "accounting monitoring" really mean? Think micro-e-business. It comes off as contradictory, but it's entirely realistic! The long-term user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. We will streamline the commonly-accepted term "subscriber-defined". Yahoo practically invented the term "user interfaces". Quick: do you have a C2C2B plan of action for handling unplanned-for robust, 24/7 raw bandwidth? If you engage dynamically, you may have to monetize iteravely. Imagine a combination of XForms and SVG. If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! The aptitude to utilize robustly leads to the ability to transition nano-virtually. Think C2C2C. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. We will brand the term "next-generation". What does the standard industry buzzword "B2B2C, plug-and-play obfuscation" really mean? We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to transition vertically than to deliver wirelessly. We will grow our power to scale without diminishing our ability to integrate. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be out-of-the-box? We think that most distributed splash pages use far too much Flash, and not enough Rails. We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate robustly than to deploy intra-mega-robustly. We will disintermediate the power of biometrics to synergize. Do you have a game plan to become customer-directed? We understand that it is better to harness vertically than to e-enable iteravely. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. What does it really mean to syndicate "magnetically"? We will syndicate the industry jargon "60/24/7/365". What does it really mean to synthesize "vertically"? Quick: do you have a real-world scheme for dealing with emerging functionalities?