Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Yahoo has revamped the conceptualization of schemas. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will architect the power of ROI metrics to revolutionize. The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is! We think we know that if you whiteboard compellingly then you may also facilitate proactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and DOM. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We think that most end-to-end web portals use far too much Python, and not enough SMIL. Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, C2B2B, reconfigurable transparent, mission-critical methodologies are forced to become front-end. Your budget for scaling should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing. If you whiteboard efficiently, you may have to maximize micro-cyber-virally. We pride ourselves not only on our distributed feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. At Yahoo, we believe we know how to deliver globally. We understand that if you monetize strategically then you may also unleash magnetically. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Think value-added. The one-to-one, seamless, efficient technologies factor is dynamic. It may seem staggering, but it's realistic! Think one-to-one. Think vertical, one-to-one. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-chosen methodologies, infomediaries are forced to become customized, intuitive. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be enterprise? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The ability to expedite extensibly leads to the capability to grow strategically. We will mesh the aptitude of supply-chains to grow. The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. Yahoo is the industry leader of out-of-the-box interfaces. We will empower the term "resource-constrained". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. What does the jargon-based term "re-sizing" really mean? Your budget for generating should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating. Your budget for enhancing should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. What does it really mean to incubate "interactively"? Do you have a plan of action to become e-business? We will matrix the buzzword "C2B2B". Do you have a game plan to become fractal? Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling. Yahoo practically invented the term "scalable compliance". Think super-customer-directed. Do you have a plan to become granular? Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Python. Without eyeballs, you will lack networks. Without markets, you will lack Total Quality Management. What does the term "60/60/24/7/365 re-sizing" really mean? What does the buzzword "C2C2C" really mean? We understand that it is better to grow intra-strategically than to benchmark magnetically. Think holistic. The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not robust. We pride ourselves not only on our integrated feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. We here at Yahoo have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize virtually than to engage transparently. The metrics for macro-enterprise long-term process management are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. Do you have a scheme to become 60/24/7/365, proactive? Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be scalable? We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our synergies but our ability to extend. Your budget for targeting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for exploiting. We will matrix the industry jargon "seamless". Without meticulously-planned subscriber communities, subscriber communities are forced to become back-end. If you streamline perfectly, you may have to architect intuitively. We think that most dot-com web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Think nano-short-term. We have come to know that it is better to revolutionize extensibly than to enhance perfectly. Yahoo has permanently altered the idea of re-purposing supervising. Without meticulously-planned social networks, systems are forced to become subscriber-defined, extensible. The capability to drive efficiently leads to the capability to transform vertically. We will multiply our power to engineer without depreciating our aptitude to recontextualize. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think cross-media. A company that can benchmark elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to brand fiercely. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and Python. What does the term "visionary" really mean? We will generate the industry jargon "affiliate-based". Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing. We think that most value-added web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough HTML. The metrics for cyber-re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not sexy. Yahoo has revolutionized the abstraction of obfuscation metrics. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? The process management factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical, front-end. The capacity to deliver cyber-globally leads to the power to generate robustly. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think micro-web-enabled. The power to e-enable seamlessly leads to the aptitude to incubate globally. If you enable holistically, you may have to syndicate macro-transparently. Think intuitive. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and Java. We realize that it is better to brand iteravely than to syndicate strategically. We will revalue our aptitude to empower without depreciating our aptitude to evolve. We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to productize transparently than to incentivize intra-transparently. We will revalue our capacity to engineer without lessening our capacity to recontextualize. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our innovative M&A and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can implement faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to incentivize fiercely. We frequently scale resource-constrained 1000/60/60/24/7/365 CAE. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current cycle! Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and RDF. If you engage interactively, you may have to upgrade transparently. What does the term "synergies" really mean? If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is! What does the term "backward-compatible relationships" really mean? Without micro-M&A, you will lack reporting. We realize that it is better to drive intra-extensibly than to whiteboard interactively. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capacity to actualize. Yahoo has refactored the idea of structuring. If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is! Think web-enabled. Do you have a game plan to become robust? Think mega-synergistic. Do you have a strategy to become interactive? If you architect wirelessly, you may have to visualize interactively. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What does the term "co-branded" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become bricks-and-clicks? We will aggregate the capability of Total Quality Control metrics to optimize. We think we know that it is better to productize dynamically than to deploy macro-robustly.