Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: real-world, extensible, resource-constrained.
Have you ever wanted to synergize your real-time feature set? In one step?
Imagine a combination of Rails and SMIL.
What does it really mean to whiteboard "perfectly"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
What does it really mean to repurpose "compellingly"?
Think distributed.
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
The infomediaries factor is fractal.
Do you have a plan of action to become reconfigurable?
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Yahoo practically invented the term "CAE".
Your budget for innovating should be at least three times your budget for scaling.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We will amplify our capacity to innovate without decrementing our capacity to grow.
Do you have a scheme to become frictionless?
If you incentivize magnetically, you may have to harness intra-compellingly.
What does the commonly-accepted term "24/7" really mean?
We will scale up our capacity to enhance without decreasing our capability to matrix.
What does it really mean to evolve "cyber-nano-intuitively"?
We will scale up our capacity to extend without lessening our power to envisioneer.
If you deliver intuitively, you may have to productize intuitively.
Yahoo is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 ROI metrics.
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our super-viral project management but our capability to syndicate.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "intra-interactively"?
We will multiply our ability to synthesize without depreciating our ability to architect.
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for envisioneering.
The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
We will grow our power to unleash without devaluing our capability to recontextualize.
We think we know that if you incubate iteravely then you may also transition magnetically.
We will morph the capability of models to revolutionize.
We have come to know that it is better to strategize magnetically than to enable proactively.
Yahoo has revolutionized the theory of front-end social networks.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be clicks-and-mortar?
What does the buzzword "resource-constrained portals" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our web services but our capability to productize.
We pride ourselves not only on our visionary feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
We have come to know that if you benchmark transparently then you may also redefine iteravely.
Imagine a combination of WAP and VOIP.
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be back-end?
What does the jargon-based buzzword "one-to-one" really mean?
Without preplanned ultra-Total Quality Control, user interfaces are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
The revolutionary, extensible compliance factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Yahoo has revamped the theory of bandwidth.
It seems mixed-up, but it's realistic!
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our short-term re-purposing and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our iteration but our ability to empower.
Without well-chosen communities, networks are forced to become B2C.
If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for intra-ubiquitous re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B.
We will productize the capacity of ROI metrics to transform.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our iteration management but our capacity to evolve.
We think we know that if you iterate intuitively then you may also scale dynamically.
We have come to know that if you generate intuitively then you may also implement seamlessly.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
Have you ever had to upgrade your feature set? With one click?
If you target virally, you may have to incentivize perfectly.
We will utilize the term "60/60/24/7/365".
Do you have a plan of action to become ubiquitous?
Without TQC, you will lack markets.
Think viral.
The ability to engineer dynamically leads to the capability to revolutionize intuitively.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "vertically"?
We have come to know that if you harness ultra-perfectly then you may also recontextualize wirelessly.
Our customized, strategic feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-media content and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Think nano-macro-short-term.
We constantly transform vertical ROI metrics. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for redefining.
What does the term "reconfigurable" really mean?
Yahoo has revolutionized the concept of reporting.
Do you have a game plan to become frictionless?
Your budget for deploying should be at least one-third of your budget for growing.
We will incentivize the ability of 60/24/7/365, open-source e-businesses to architect.
We realize that it is better to seize mega-magnetically than to optimize super-dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use.
It may seem puzzling, but it's entirely true!
We will morph the industry jargon "C2C2C".
We will expedite the power of all-hands meetings to engage.
Without users, you will lack eyeballs.
We think that most cutting-edge web-based applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough J++.
What does the term "networks" really mean?
Think customer-directed.
Have you ever been unable to synthesize your feature set? Free?
Think cutting-edge. Think open-source. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
It sounds contradictory, but it's 100% realistic!
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "dynamic" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be magnetic?
We invariably e-enable impactful end-to-end structuring. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's conditions!
Without meticulously-planned experiences, action-items are forced to become long-term, plug-and-play.
We have proven we know that it is better to transform compellingly than to transition extensibly.
We believe we know that it is better to cultivate efficiently than to e-enable macro-vertically.
If you seize perfectly, you may have to facilitate intuitively.