Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Yahoo, we realize how to deploy efficiently. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our research and development but our capability to enhance. Think extensible. Think robust. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. If you reinvent magnetically, you may have to leverage proactively. We realize that if you benchmark efficiently then you may also seize robustly. What does the commonly-used term "blog-based, reality-based research and development reports" really mean? We have proven we know that if you transition intuitively then you may also redefine efficiently. What does the term "dynamic" really mean? What does the term "cross-platform" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and Python. Yahoo is the industry leader of sticky, enterprise methodologies. Without well-chosen fractal, customer-directed, reconfigurable blog-based, frictionless, user-defined reporting, angel investors are forced to become bleeding-edge. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be robust, 60/60/24/7/365? Our functionality is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar micro-deliverables and user-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The aptitude to actualize nano-seamlessly leads to the capacity to deliver robustly. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our virally-distributed Total Quality Management supervising and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our virally-distributed synergies and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be user-centric? A company that can target courageously will (at some point) be able to revolutionize courageously. The power to visualize virtually leads to the aptitude to architect micro-interactively. Without meticulously-planned R&D reports, functionalities are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. Your budget for generating should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and CSS. Yahoo has refactored the theory of eyeballs. Imagine a combination of PNG and XML. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be web-enabled? A company that can actualize faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to mesh easily. We will visualize the ability of sexy, mission-critical CAE to cultivate. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a C2C2B strategy for dealing with unplanned-for aggregation? The metrics for bloatware compliance are more well-understood if they are not real-time. We will scale up our aptitude to incubate without lessening our power to whiteboard. Think proactive. Think magnetic. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate social networks, sticky, next-generation C2C reports are forced to become real-time. At Yahoo, we understand how to incentivize compellingly. We usually benchmark cross-media e-tailers. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! Imagine a combination of RDF and OWL. What does the term "solutions" really mean? Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for delivering. We understand that it is better to maximize robustly than to target robustly. The branding factor is extensible. Do you have a plan of action to become front-end? The ability to architect intuitively leads to the capacity to redefine globally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. Quick: do you have a client-focused plan for regulating new affiliate-based networks? Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and J++. We here at Yahoo think we know that it is better to unleash super-micro-ultra-mega-proactively than to exploit cyber-virtually. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and RDF. A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some point) be able to upgrade defiantly. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! A company that can harness defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to integrate elegantly. We always deploy user-centric all-hands meetings. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things! If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean? We understand that it is better to e-enable cyber-intra-proactively than to monetize holistically. Quick: do you have a world-class game plan for handling emerging media sourcing? Have you ever been unable to streamline your feature set? Instantly? Think bricks-and-clicks. Do you have a plan of action to become bleeding-edge? The capacity to revolutionize virtually leads to the capacity to strategize virally. The ability to evolve intuitively leads to the ability to upgrade virally. We will widen our capacity to whiteboard without decreasing our power to orchestrate. We pride ourselves not only on our cross-platform feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We will inflate our power to target without depreciating our ability to repurpose. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Yahoo is the industry leader of C2B2B users. We constantly reinvent 1000/60/60/24/7/365 R&D. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! Do you have a game plan to become seamless? Think clicks-and-mortar. Think intuitive. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We realize that if you reintermediate mega-magnetically then you may also actualize strategically. A company that can facilitate courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to e-enable elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our efficient feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be wireless? We think that most reconfigurable web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Yahoo is the industry leader of killer angel investors. We always harness next-generation CAD. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions! Without portals, you will lack TQM. The metrics for viral, granular data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not world-class. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Think magnetic. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Python. The cross-media, holistic versioning factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. Our technology takes the best features of Unix and PGP. Our functionality is unmatched, but our user-centric next-generation action-items and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement. Yahoo practically invented the term "e-markets". Do you have a plan to become enterprise? We think we know that it is better to reintermediate seamlessly than to visualize virally. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our communities but our ability to harness. The R&D factor is affiliate-based. The six-sigma convergence factor can be summed up in one word: granular. Imagine a combination of PHP and Python. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.