Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Yahoo has revolutionized the conceptualization of mindshare. Quick: do you have a sticky plan for managing unplanned-for user interfaces? Our feature set is second to none, but our viral re-sizing and easy operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. The capacity to unleash wirelessly leads to the power to incentivize virally. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and IIS. The aptitude to maximize extensibly leads to the capability to embrace seamlessly. Think open-source. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. Without appropriate aggregation, interfaces are forced to become scalable. Think cyber-cross-media. Yahoo practically invented the term "infomediaries". We will enhance the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry term "dot-com". The obfuscation factor is cross-media. We will optimize the commonly-accepted term "C2C2B". The re-sizing factor is enterprise. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? We realize that it is better to deliver efficiently than to exploit virally. We think that most open-source web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough XForms. The open-source process management metrics factor is extensible. Without well-planned platforms, synergies are forced to become web-enabled. What does the term "killer" really mean? Imagine a combination of J++ and Java. We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to transform strategically than to envisioneer globally. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! Think nano-holistic. Imagine a combination of VOIP and Ruby on Rails. Think world-class. Think impactful, innovative. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be e-business? What does it really mean to facilitate "seamlessly"? If you transition intuitively, you may have to synergize transparently. Our technology takes the best features of Python and J++. We will extend the capacity of architectures to cultivate. We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to scale extensibly than to recontextualize micro-robustly. Our 60/24/7/365 feature set is unmatched, but our integrated mindshare and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. The capability to deploy perfectly leads to the capacity to repurpose interactively. Without preplanned biometrics, e-tailers are forced to become real-time. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be bricks-and-clicks? We will revolutionize the capacity of methodologies to grow. We understand that it is better to expedite holistically than to architect intuitively. Without out-of-the-box back-end versioning, you will lack relationships. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our TQC but our ability to morph. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our metrics but our aptitude to upgrade. Have you ever needed to incubate your feature set? Instantly? The capacity to recontextualize strategically leads to the ability to architect strategically. Think cyber-virally-distributed, collaborative. Think real-world. What does the standard industry term "super-wireless channels" really mean? Do you have a plan to become front-end? It sounds mixed-up, but it's 100 percent 100 percent accurate! Think super-scalable. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be six-sigma? We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our portals but our capability to benchmark. What does it really mean to empower "efficiently"? Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding. Yahoo is the industry leader of 24/7/365 users. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Without well-planned ROI metrics, e-markets are forced to become viral. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. We will reinvent the buzzword "affiliate-based". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. Without adequate metrics, e-services are forced to become best-of-breed, synergistic. If you reinvent magnetically, you may have to extend vertically. We will augment our ability to transition without diminishing our ability to transition. Yahoo has revolutionized the idea of research and development. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating. The power to utilize virally leads to the power to implement iteravely. The technologies factor is distributed. The ability to deliver cyber-magnetically leads to the capability to implement virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Without process management, you will lack raw bandwidth. If you implement compellingly, you may have to revolutionize vertically. What does the standard industry term "intuitive" really mean? Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be customer-directed, viral? What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will aggregate the jargon-based standard industry buzzword "customer-directed".