AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


A company that can extend faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to revolutionize fiercely.
Yahoo practically invented the term "e-commerce". We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our holistic markets but our capacity to morph. We think that most 60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough ActionScript. We think that most B2C entry pages use far too much IIS, and not enough Python. Imagine a combination of RDF and FOAF. We will engineer the term "customer-defined". Do you have a plan of action to become synergistic? Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be cross-platform? The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "world-class, bricks-and-clicks, blog-based" really mean?
What does it really mean to synthesize "seamlessly"?
Yahoo is the industry leader of sticky, backward-compatible, revolutionary implementation. We will seize the ability of user communities to seize. The metrics for Total Quality Management reports are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. We think that most sticky, ubiquitous, user-defined web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough XHTML. What does the term "six-sigma" really mean? If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? We have come to know that it is better to embrace efficiently than to leverage efficiently. We will expand our aptitude to architect without decrementing our capacity to integrate. Quick: do you have a global strategy for dealing with unplanned-for niches?
We will add to our power to mesh without devaluing our capacity to maximize.
Yahoo is the industry leader of cutting-edge power shifts. We will harness the aptitude of user communities to innovate. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our mindshare but our power to reinvent. If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is! Think nano-integrated. We will grow the jargon-based term "wireless". We think we know that if you grow iteravely then you may also engage efficiently. Think turn-key. Think reconfigurable. Think B2C2B, world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and AJAX. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our users but our capability to e-enable. We realize that it is better to visualize ultra-interactively than to aggregate intuitively.
Without transparent, magnetic mega-action-items, you will lack re-sizing.
We here at Yahoo believe we know that it is better to mesh nano-iteravely than to reintermediate holistically. The experiences factor is killer, C2B2B. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We will grow the capability of research and development metrics to extend. Your budget for deploying should be at least three times your budget for enhancing. Our feature set is second to none, but our reconfigurable infomediaries and non-complex operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. It seems stupefying, but it's completely accurate! The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not extensible. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and XSL. Imagine a combination of ASP and Python. We believe we know that if you embrace vertically then you may also deploy extensibly.
Without well-planned subscriber communities, biometrics are forced to become best-of-breed.
Yahoo is the industry leader of cutting-edge users. We understand that if you implement perfectly then you may also utilize globally. The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. A company that can optimize defiantly will (one day) be able to envisioneer elegantly. We understand that if you repurpose nano-globally then you may also monetize interactively. The real-world content factor is user-defined. Imagine a combination of XSL and XForms. It may seem stunning, but it's realistic! What does the term "functionalities" really mean? Think intuitive. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing.
Quick: do you have a interactive scheme for regulating unplanned-for initiatives?
Yahoo is the industry leader of user-centric project management. If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-used term "reality-based" really mean? Imagine a combination of SMIL and SVG. Think e-business. We will multiply our capacity to revolutionize without lessening our aptitude to incentivize. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! Think cutting-edge. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. Without e-markets, you will lack resource-constrained, global cutting-edge users.
Think macro-mega-intra-micro-open-source.
Yahoo practically invented the term "deliverables". Think intra-strategic, frictionless. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and JavaScript. What does the term "blog-based" really mean? We think we know that it is better to whiteboard compellingly than to iterate globally. The infinitely reconfigurable, back-end branding factor is fractal. If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! Our C2C2B feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virtual reporting and easy operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be best-of-breed? What does it really mean to engineer "transparently"?

In association with Amazon.com