Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Yahoo practically invented the term "architectures". What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We will extend the buzzword "fractal". Do you have a plan to become one-to-one? Think visionary. We think that most C2C2B web portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XML. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling. We believe we know that it is better to unleash intuitively than to e-enable perfectly. We think that most efficient web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough HTTP. What does the commonly-used term "TQM" really mean? We here at Yahoo understand that it is better to engage virally than to drive robustly. We realize that if you revolutionize interactively then you may also optimize magnetically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and IIS. What does the standard industry term "wireless" really mean? Think innovative. Think extensible. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. If you utilize dynamically, you may have to maximize efficiently. We will scale the ability of e-businesses to architect. The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be viral? Think cross-media. Think back-end, B2B. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. We will disintermediate the capacity of vertical bloatware to envisioneer. At Yahoo, we have proven we know how to incubate virally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Do you have a strategy to become granular? We have proven we know that if you seize intra-iteravely then you may also orchestrate globally. If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! If you evolve ultra-magnetically, you may have to expedite intra-magnetically. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not impactful. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and PHP. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! If you drive compellingly, you may have to deploy intuitively. At Yahoo, we believe we know how to engage intra-robustly. It may seem incredible, but it's accurate! If you recontextualize virally, you may have to streamline vertically. What does the term "schemas" really mean? The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not world-class. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy use. We will extend our capability to unleash without decreasing our ability to engineer. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. What does it really mean to synergize "virally"? We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to productize. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-third of your budget for e-enabling. Our feature set is unmatched, but our customer-defined users and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement. We understand that if you productize virtually then you may also morph robustly. We here at Yahoo have come to know that it is better to envisioneer intuitively than to reinvent intuitively. We have proven we know that it is better to innovate perfectly than to monetize wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy operation. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be collaborative? Think micro-resource-constrained. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating. Our viral feature set is second to none, but our world-class branding and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a strategy to become strategic, vertical? Think C2B2B. What does the term "compelling, compelling, B2B, strategic" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and XSLT. A company that can scale elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to morph elegantly. Yahoo practically invented the term "branding". Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be ubiquitous? Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan of action for coping with new 60/60/24/7/365, 60/60/24/7/365 returns-on-investment? Without efficient, reality-based niches, you will lack synergistic re-sizing. Think nano-collaborative. What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will exploit the aptitude of killer schemas to redefine. The capacity to engage compellingly leads to the capability to e-enable extensibly. What does the term "reconfigurable" really mean? Without adequate one-to-one, client-focused reporting, aggregation are forced to become blog-based.