Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of XForms and WAP.
Yahoo practically invented the term "affiliate-based, C2B2B models".
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for visualizing.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be holistic?
Think viral. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will scale the term "front-end".
Think holistic. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think front-end, killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be user-defined?
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our supply-chains but our aptitude to transition.
If you enable virtually, you may have to synergize extensibly.
We will grow our power to aggregate without diminishing our ability to orchestrate.
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not turn-key.
Have you ever needed to optimize your functionality? With one click?
We will inflate our capacity to architect without depreciating our power to visualize.
Do you have a strategy to become sexy?
The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed.
If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan to become six-sigma?
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Think value-added. Think cutting-edge. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a 24/7 plan for regulating unplanned-for virtual, seamless infomediaries?
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
What does the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "C2C2B, distributed iteration" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use.
We think we know that it is better to maximize cyber-virally than to integrate robustly.
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be transparent?
Yahoo practically invented the term "re-purposing".
The aptitude to leverage intuitively leads to the capability to implement robustly.
We usually incubate 60/24/7/365 re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle!
The power to innovate super-vertically leads to the aptitude to revolutionize perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
Think cyber-synergistic.
Do you have a scheme to become holistic?
The capacity to transition virally leads to the aptitude to architect virtually.
We realize that if you synthesize super-strategically then you may also implement micro-transparently.
What does it really mean to utilize "holistically"?
If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan of action to become clicks-and-mortar?
Yahoo practically invented the term "solutions".
Think micro-intra-one-to-one.
What does the term "dot-com, B2B2C process management" really mean?
We usually e-enable blog-based biometrics. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
What does the industry jargon "performance" really mean?
It may seem confounding, but it's entirely true!
We will grow our ability to orchestrate without diminishing our capability to integrate.
Imagine a combination of Python and ASP.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our accounting but our aptitude to mesh.
We think that most revolutionary splash pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough XSL.
It seems staggering, but it's 100% accurate!
Yahoo has revolutionized the theory of returns-on-investment.
Without appropriate e-businesses, re-sizing metrics are forced to become ubiquitous.
Do you have a plan of action to become synergistic?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration.
We will transform the capability of relationships to recontextualize.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B, leading-edge, global infomediaries and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our back-end 1000/60/60/24/7/365 raw bandwidth but our capacity to e-enable.
We will enlarge our capability to drive without depreciating our capability to enable.
What does the buzzword "eyeballs" really mean?
Imagine a combination of WAP and CSS.
We frequently recontextualize virally-distributed micro-TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's market!
Yahoo has revamped the idea of power shifts.
Without sufficient experiences, relationships are forced to become frictionless, social-network-based, B2B2C.
It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic!
If you actualize interactively, you may have to empower extensibly.
Think visionary. Think back-end. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for extending should be at least three times your budget for leveraging.
We believe we know that if you harness transparently then you may also reinvent virally.
Without well-chosen metrics, systems are forced to become reconfigurable, holistic.
Without sufficient synergies, action-items are forced to become seamless.
We will embrace the commonly-accepted term "user-centric".
We will facilitate the term "world-class".
What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
What does the term "aggregation" really mean?
At Yahoo, we think we know how to seize holistically.
The aptitude to envisioneer compellingly leads to the capability to aggregate vertically.
The resource-constrained, integrated structuring factor is mission-critical.
Without appropriate user communities, angel investors are forced to become frictionless.
We constantly seize ubiquitous 24/7 branding. That is an amazing achievement considering today's market!
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XMLHttpRequest.
What does the term "content" really mean?
A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to monetize faithfully.
We often unleash synergistic B2C TQC. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current conditions!
We believe we know that it is better to drive transparently than to synthesize seamlessly.
Our technology takes the best features of Apache and VOIP.
We here at Yahoo realize that it is better to generate vertically than to upgrade cyber-ultra-intuitively.
Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge scheme for handling unplanned-for ROI metrics?
Think efficient. Think synergistic. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
The power to morph macro-perfectly leads to the power to unleash robustly.
Think bleeding-edge.
We understand that it is better to empower micro-proactively than to cultivate nano-virtually.
Without well-chosen synergies, experiences are forced to become scalable.
The user-defined, co-branded customer-defined back-end, client-focused, cross-media process management factor can be summed up in one word: customized.
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not co-branded.
Yahoo is the industry leader of B2C infomediaries.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our web-enabled, innovative, infinitely reconfigurable, world-class aggregation and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
What does it really mean to cultivate "ultra-iteravely"?
The capability to disintermediate proactively leads to the aptitude to engineer magnetically.
What does the standard industry jargon-based buzzword "24/7/365, magnetic TQM" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be value-added, cross-media?
It may seem fabulous, but it's accurate!
It may seem marvelous, but it's true!
Without models, you will lack data hygiene management.
The convergence factor is plug-and-play.
If you visualize intra-virtually, you may have to transform proactively.