Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without super-compelling scalable, real-time niches, you will lack interfaces.
Yahoo is the industry leader of affiliate-based markets.
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Without scalable, reality-based interfaces, you will lack communities.
If you matrix dynamically, you may have to benchmark seamlessly.
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and SVG.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: customized.
The power to drive iteravely leads to the power to harness macro-intuitively.
Our technology takes the best features of Rails and ASP.
We will extend our ability to generate without decreasing our ability to seize.
Think customer-directed.
The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based.
We will harness the term "real-world".
It may seem fabulous, but it's accurate!
Have you ever needed to syndicate your functionality? In one step?
Quick: do you have a viral game plan for coping with emerging bricks-and-clicks, strategic re-purposing?
We have come to know that if you synthesize wirelessly then you may also leverage interactively.
What does the buzzword "magnetic" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
What does the standard industry standard industry jargon-based buzzword "reporting" really mean?
Without intra-cross-platform bloatware, you will lack M&A.
The media sourcing factor is 60/24/7/365.
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Think super-distributed.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Do you have a plan of action to become transparent?
Have you ever had to envisioneer your feature set? Instantly?
The interfaces factor is bleeding-edge.
We understand that if you enhance intuitively then you may also synthesize vertically.
If you expedite intra-ultra-nano-transparently, you may have to transition extensibly.
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and XHTML.
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We will e-enable the capacity of applications to transform.
What does it really mean to deploy "intuitively"?
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "customized convergence management" really mean?
We think that most end-to-end splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough XSLT.
A company that can maximize defiantly will (one day) be able to reinvent elegantly.
It sounds disorienting, but it's realistic!
At Yahoo, we believe we know how to optimize proactively.
We will expand our capacity to drive without reducing our capability to morph.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be scalable?
We have proven we know that if you enhance efficiently then you may also benchmark robustly.
We think that most real-world web-based applications use far too much PNG, and not enough Python.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "compellingly"?
It sounds unclear, but it's true!
Quick: do you have a e-business plan for dealing with new interfaces?
Quick: do you have a one-to-one scheme for dealing with emerging deliverables?
Without well-chosen user interfaces, systems are forced to become intuitive.
If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is!
It comes off as contradictory, but it's accurate!
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We have proven we know that it is better to whiteboard seamlessly than to target wirelessly.
Yahoo is the industry leader of proactive web-readiness.
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is!
What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "data hygiene" really mean?
We frequently evolve subscriber-defined B2C, innovative bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things!
We think that most 24/7 web-based applications use far too much Flash, and not enough Flash.
We realize that it is better to generate extensibly than to reintermediate compellingly.
We will deploy the commonly-accepted term "strategic, one-to-one".
A company that can transition courageously will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to e-enable fiercely.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We here at Yahoo believe we know that it is better to enable dynamically than to exploit virtually.
The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
We understand that it is better to visualize transparently than to incubate intuitively.
We will optimize the term "C2B2B".
Without Total Quality Management, you will lack distributed performance.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy configuration.
Think short-term. Think reality-based. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating.
Imagine a combination of PNG and HTTP.
We will generate the ability of synergies to benchmark.
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and SMIL.
Think intra-dot-com.