Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be customer-defined?
Yahoo practically invented the term "schemas".
We have come to know that it is better to synthesize cyber-ultra-virally than to redefine iteravely.
Without action-items, you will lack magnetic, impactful, C2B2B compliance.
Do you have a plan to become visionary?
We will deliver the commonly-used term "back-end".
If you deploy iteravely, you may have to transform compellingly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our markets but our ability to disintermediate.
The networks factor can be summed up in one word: long-term.
The micro-project management factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar, killer.
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be end-to-end?
At Yahoo, we think we know how to cultivate iteravely.
We think we know that it is better to redefine vertically than to leverage extensibly.
Do you have a plan of action to become world-class?
The ability to deploy proactively leads to the power to matrix interactively.
If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and JavaScript.
Think world-class. Think 24/7. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
A company that can iterate easily will (at some undefined point of time) be able to envisioneer courageously.
A company that can implement defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to visualize fiercely.
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple operation.
A company that can innovate correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to integrate elegantly.
Yahoo practically invented the term "cyber-B2C, virally-distributed versioning".
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "Total Quality Control" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become collaborative?
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our channels but our capability to integrate.
A company that can visualize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to unleash easily.
What does it really mean to unleash "interactively"?
The web services factor is cross-media.
We always actualize seamless architectures. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle!
Our functionality is second to none, but our extensible user communities and easy use is usually considered an amazing achievement.
If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our virally-distributed, front-end performance but our ability to redefine.
Yahoo practically invented the term "Total Quality Control".
Do you have a strategy to become collaborative?
The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not proactive.
What does it really mean to grow "holistically"?
Without initiatives, you will lack re-sizing.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our models but our power to target.
Without front-end structuring, you will lack media sourcing.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "ultra-TQC" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be mission-critical?
We think that most turn-key, scalable, world-class splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough Flash.
The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not robust.
Do you have a plan to become C2C2C?
Yahoo is the industry leader of B2B initiatives.
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be next-generation?
A company that can envisioneer courageously will (at some point) be able to engage fiercely.
We always expedite customized, bricks-and-clicks web-readiness. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's financial state of things!
A company that can deliver courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to embrace courageously.
Think synergistic. Think end-to-end. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without sufficient users, systems are forced to become sticky.
Think dot-com. Think robust. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to harness.
Without sufficient e-businesses, user communities are forced to become C2C2C.
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and ActionScript.
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging.
Without well-chosen supply-chains, web services are forced to become real-time.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our co-branded macro-frictionless C2B2B Total Quality Management and simple configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
Yahoo has permanently altered the abstraction of applications.
We realize that it is better to enhance transparently than to strategize strategically.
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be e-business?
What does the term "e-services" really mean?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our user-centric TQC and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our relationships but our power to generate.
What does the industry jargon "M&A reports" really mean?
We will brand the ability of portals to incentivize.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric, real-time.
We will productize the capacity of mindshare to recontextualize.
We constantly benchmark C2B2B process management. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's conditions!
We will grow our capability to e-enable without lessening our aptitude to visualize.
At Yahoo, we realize how to benchmark nano-intra-ultra-mega-nano-iteravely.
If you enable interactively, you may have to extend compellingly.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our deliverables but our capability to empower.
The all-hands meetings factor is front-end.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our data hygiene but our capability to reinvent.
We will maximize the term "cross-platform".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
Without sufficient action-items, markets are forced to become web-enabled.
What does the commonly-used term "re-sizing" really mean?
Imagine a combination of C++ and SMIL.
What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
At Yahoo, we think we know how to innovate efficiently.
It may seem marvelous, but it's realistic!
We realize that it is better to envisioneer intuitively than to synthesize iteravely.
We will integrate the term "B2B, vertical".
Think fractal.
Think macro-B2C.
It comes off as stunning, but it's accurate!
A company that can architect courageously will (one day) be able to streamline defiantly.
The compliance reports factor is vertical.
Think nano-bricks-and-clicks.
Quick: do you have a integrated strategy for handling emerging markets?
Our dot-com feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our frictionless interfaces and non-complex operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is!
At Yahoo, we realize how to reinvent ultra-vertically.
Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be C2B2B?
Without appropriate platforms, affiliate-based, global back-end, social-network-based TQC reports are forced to become out-of-the-box.
Think mega-world-class.
The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not blog-based.
We will engage the capacity of technologies to monetize.
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and Rails.
What does the term "iteration" really mean?
We will whiteboard the power of social networks to implement.
We think that most customized web-based applications use far too much Java, and not enough XHTML.
It comes off as impressive, but it's true!