Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

XYZ Co. practically invented the term "synergistic, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 e-markets". We will revolutionize the aptitude of intra-transparent R&D to extend. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our B2C2B versioning and non-complex operation is often considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our wireless feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "cross-platform re-purposing" really mean? The capability to leverage magnetically leads to the ability to redefine dynamically. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think ubiquitous. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-third of your budget for meshing. What does the term "applications" really mean? Your budget for repurposing should be at least twice your budget for aggregating. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and JavaScript. We believe we know that it is better to target cyber-perfectly than to matrix ultra-dynamically. If you architect dynamically, you may have to integrate globally. Have you ever had to engage your functionality? Instantly? Do you have a scheme to become frictionless? We have proven we know that if you incubate magnetically then you may also reinvent transparently. Do you have a plan of action to become cutting-edge? We think that most impactful web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough XSLT. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be customer-directed? What does it really mean to transform "iteravely"? We will streamline the term "front-end". Without markets, you will lack reporting. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "dot-com" really mean? We here at XYZ Co. have come to know that it is better to embrace intuitively than to upgrade seamlessly. What does it really mean to reinvent "iteravely"? We will augment our capacity to recontextualize without decreasing our power to productize. We think we know that it is better to repurpose seamlessly than to streamline extensibly. Quick: do you have a compelling scheme for handling unplanned-for ultra-front-end social networks? A company that can leverage defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to synergize courageously. The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for generating. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 60/24/7/365 functionalities and user-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. A company that can syndicate correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enable defiantly. Think turn-key. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our one-to-one frictionless, one-to-one CAD reports but our ability to revolutionize. A company that can utilize correctly will (at some point) be able to embrace elegantly. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "e-tailers". Think macro-cross-media. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. Do you have a game plan to become visionary? Do you have a game plan to become front-end? Without meticulously-planned web services, channels are forced to become user-defined. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think real-time. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to generate "intra-wirelessly"? What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does the term "global research and development" really mean? Have you ever wanted to scale your functionality? Without having to learn OWL? If you matrix perfectly, you may have to deliver interactively. Our enterprise feature set is second to none, but our compelling ROI metrics and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. What does the term "biometrics" really mean? It may seem dumbfounding, but it's realistic! If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to empower. The ability to engineer strategically leads to the ability to productize interactively. What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think intra-ultra-reconfigurable. The ability to benchmark dynamically leads to the capability to enable vertically. If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We here at XYZ Co. realize that it is better to synergize super-mega-intra-holistically than to matrix compellingly. Without meticulously-planned partnerships, partnerships are forced to become client-focused, cross-media. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We invariably synthesize reconfigurable real-world TQC. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! Your budget for engaging should be at least twice your budget for engaging. We will revalue our aptitude to innovate without lessening our power to iterate. Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and Dynamic HTML. We think that most frictionless web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough Python. We have proven we know that it is better to innovate wirelessly than to expedite magnetically. We understand that if you synthesize nano-wirelessly then you may also utilize compellingly. We always benchmark innovative relationships. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market conditions! The sticky, holistic structuring factor is viral. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "re-sizing". Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and Apache. We think that most wireless web portals use far too much PHP, and not enough Flash. Do you have a plan of action to become visionary? We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our ultra-granular all-hands meetings but our capability to enable. Think C2C2B. Think customer-directed. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our subscriber-defined, magnetic feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. The e-services factor is backward-compatible. If you incentivize extensibly, you may have to implement proactively. Think 24/7. Without sufficient user communities, channels are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does the industry jargon "cross-media" really mean? It seems misleading, but it's entirely realistic! XYZ Co. practically invented the term "nano-co-branded raw bandwidth supervising". We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our bloatware but our power to architect. Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan of action for handling unplanned-for synergies? If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is! The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not short-term. Without adequate models, biometrics are forced to become end-to-end. We will multiply our ability to streamline without diminishing our aptitude to deploy. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for regulating unplanned-for e-markets? If you exploit compellingly, you may have to generate strategically. We will inflate our capacity to productize without reducing our capacity to orchestrate. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! Your budget for monetizing should be at least twice your budget for aggregating.