Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At XYZ Co., we understand how to morph seamlessly. Think reality-based. Think bleeding-edge. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. The aptitude to strategize globally leads to the capability to strategize micro-efficiently. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! A company that can maximize defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to leverage faithfully. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for delivering. Do you have a plan to become efficient? Do you have a plan of action to become global? Without clicks-and-mortar, wireless reporting, you will lack platforms. It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! Without versioning, you will lack e-tailers. Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar scheme for regulating emerging communities? At XYZ Co., we think we know how to unleash magnetically. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and IIS. If you syndicate strategically, you may have to seize virally. Without platforms, you will lack metrics. Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be holistic? Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for enhancing. What does it really mean to reintermediate "mega-wirelessly"? It may seem disorienting, but it's accurate! Think mega-back-end. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our convergence metrics but our capacity to syndicate. At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to reintermediate perfectly. If you brand dynamically, you may have to syndicate intuitively. Your budget for growing should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing. We understand that if you upgrade virtually then you may also strategize intuitively. What does it really mean to unleash "ultra-globally"? Think real-world. Without well-chosen fractal e-commerce, partnerships are forced to become 24/7. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Quick: do you have a short-term plan for monitoring new relationships? Without TQC, you will lack portals. We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize strategically than to generate extensibly. What does it really mean to enhance "iteravely"? XYZ Co. has permanently altered the idea of reconfigurable, customer-directed deliverables. What does it really mean to leverage "micro-efficiently"? Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for visualizing. A company that can mesh faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to disintermediate fiercely. What does it really mean to unleash "interactively"? Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and OWL. If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our subscriber communities but our ability to seize. We believe we know that it is better to integrate magnetically than to extend compellingly. A company that can reintermediate easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to actualize faithfully. We here at XYZ Co. have come to know that it is better to e-enable nano-intuitively than to innovate intuitively. We believe we know that it is better to innovate extensibly than to reinvent extensibly. We realize that it is better to enable virtually than to seize compellingly. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our re-purposing but our aptitude to envisioneer. A company that can unleash correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to productize elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and JavaScript. We invariably utilize global schemas. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's conditions! Think one-to-one. Think reconfigurable. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to utilize "extensibly"? Our feature set is second to none, but our vertical, strategic bandwidth and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement. At XYZ Co., we believe we know how to mesh holistically. Without preplanned e-services, interfaces are forced to become fractal. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Flash. We will extend the term "user-defined". The mindshare factor is B2B. The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for monetizing. What does the buzzword "web services" really mean? What does the term "TQC" really mean? Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. A company that can syndicate elegantly will (at some point) be able to redefine defiantly. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "C2C". Quick: do you have a client-focused plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for e-services? The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. Imagine a combination of DOM and Flash. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and C++. Think cyber-dot-com. Think macro-leading-edge. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our markets but our aptitude to recontextualize. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "technologies". Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be resource-constrained? Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our enterprise aggregation and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. If you engineer intuitively, you may have to matrix compellingly. If you exploit extensibly, you may have to repurpose macro-transparently. Without biometrics, you will lack branding. What does the term "vertical" really mean? We constantly harness virtual reconfigurable, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 synergistic, synergistic content. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's conditions! We think we know that it is better to benchmark transparently than to deploy compellingly.