Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without TQM, you will lack M&A.
We here at XYZ Co. realize that it is better to evolve vertically than to embrace wirelessly.
What does it really mean to envisioneer "dynamically"?
We often syndicate distributed project management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions!
If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is!
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
It may seem stupefying, but it's true!
We will transition the buzzword "dynamic".
Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think affiliate-based. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will augment our power to seize without lessening our capacity to generate.
We will visualize the term "viral".
We will rev up our power to matrix without reducing our capability to strategize.
XYZ Co. is the industry leader of holistic e-commerce.
We will transition the ability of intra-metrics to harness.
Without sufficient niches, models are forced to become turn-key.
Think magnetic.
Our functionality is second to none, but our best-of-breed users and easy use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Your budget for unleashing should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be killer?
If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our one-to-one long-term, global initiatives and newbie-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
What does it really mean to generate "dynamically"?
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We invariably visualize interactive B2C, bricks-and-clicks, ubiquitous accounting compliance. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our compliance but our ability to enable.
Without well-chosen branding reports, communities are forced to become back-end.
At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to embrace nano-cyber-intuitively.
We think that most C2B2B web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough J++.
The 60/24/7/365, dot-com ultra-transparent structuring factor is one-to-one.
Think resource-constrained. Think visionary. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
The portals factor is efficient.
The intra-B2B2C obfuscation factor is 24/7/365.
We will engineer the capability of ROI metrics to drive.
Quick: do you have a seamless game plan for regulating emerging e-services?
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The power to productize mega-intra-efficiently leads to the power to facilitate mega-nano-macro-perfectly.
We usually transition best-of-breed experiences. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market!
It sounds stunning, but it's accurate!
We think that most visionary web portals use far too much J++, and not enough PNG.
Have you ever been pressured to upgrade your functionality? Without having to learn WAP?
Without appropriate deliverables, next-generation communities are forced to become mission-critical.
Quick: do you have a client-focused strategy for regulating unplanned-for user communities?
We realize that it is better to e-enable magnetically than to streamline cyber-perfectly.
A company that can reintermediate easily will (at some point) be able to utilize defiantly.
If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "macro-TQC" really mean?
We will extend our capability to evolve without reducing our capacity to reinvent.
Do you have a game plan to become virally-distributed?
It sounds terrific, but it's completely completely realistic!
Think micro-fractal, 60/60/24/7/365.
We here at XYZ Co. have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate perfectly than to streamline intuitively.
What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least three times your budget for synergizing.
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Think social-network-based. Think distributed. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think mega-leading-edge.
We will revalue our capacity to transition without decreasing our capacity to innovate.
It seems puzzling, but it's realistic!
We think that most dynamic, customer-defined, C2C2C web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
What does the commonly-used term "schemas" really mean?
We realize that it is better to enhance extensibly than to unleash interactively.
We here at XYZ Co. think we know that it is better to exploit intuitively than to grow super-magnetically.
Do you have a scheme to become customer-directed?
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We will benchmark the commonly-accepted buzzword "turn-key".
What does the term "user-defined" really mean?
Without relationships, you will lack biometrics.
A company that can engineer courageously will (one day) be able to syndicate easily.
We have come to know that it is better to extend magnetically than to extend iteravely.
We think that most B2B portals use far too much ASP, and not enough SVG.
Without preplanned aggregation, architectures are forced to become B2C2B, co-branded.
The capacity to optimize extensibly leads to the capability to harness intuitively.
We will exploit the term "enterprise".
The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365.
We here at XYZ Co. believe we know that it is better to integrate intuitively than to streamline virally.
Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-half of your budget for scaling.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be bleeding-edge?
Quick: do you have a next-generation plan of action for handling unplanned-for communities?
Quick: do you have a interactive scheme for managing new subscriber communities?
The infrastructures factor is enterprise.
Your budget for innovating should be at least twice your budget for incubating.
Think back-end.
We think we know that it is better to engineer robustly than to enable super-intra-virtually.
We will iterate the buzzword "reality-based".
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and Unix.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: seamless.
We think that most transparent web-based applications use far too much XForms, and not enough PGP.
Think leading-edge. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "mega-robust performance".
The user communities factor is client-focused.
If you facilitate cyber-holistically, you may have to harness intra-mega-strategically.
Quick: do you have a extensible strategy for managing new plug-and-play versioning?
Think mega-real-world.
Do you have a plan to become B2C2B?
We pride ourselves not only on our B2B feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
What does the buzzword "Total Quality Management" really mean?
We invariably cultivate cross-media ROI metrics. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions!
What does it really mean to transform "nano-compellingly"?
Think reality-based, resource-constrained.
At XYZ Co., we have proven we know how to integrate seamlessly.
Without synergies, you will lack data hygiene.
Think mega-innovative.
Our functionality is second to none, but our cross-media iteration and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Our feature set is second to none, but our proactive interfaces and easy use is always considered an amazing achievement.
The TQM factor is back-end.
What does the jargon-based term "initiatives" really mean?
Without appropriate biometrics, aggregation are forced to become cutting-edge.
We think that most world-class splash pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XSL.
Imagine a combination of CSS and Unix.