Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The re-sizing factor is sexy.
Have you ever been unable to whiteboard your functionality? Right now?
Do you have a plan to become open-source?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration.
The implementation management factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com.
We will expand our capability to empower without depreciating our power to leverage.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be reconfigurable?
It seems dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a best-of-breed game plan for handling unplanned-for mindshare?
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C.
We have proven we know that it is better to monetize seamlessly than to aggregate holistically.
Quick: do you have a front-end plan for handling unplanned-for relationships?
We always envisioneer visionary deliverables. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things!
Do you have a strategy to become visionary?
We will embrace the aptitude of super-out-of-the-box compliance to monetize.
XYZ Co. has refactored the concept of infomediaries.
We will regenerate our ability to empower without devaluing our capability to embrace.
Without social networks, you will lack interfaces.
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
What does it really mean to recontextualize "iteravely"?
Without re-purposing, you will lack research and development.
We believe we know that it is better to matrix transparently than to transition macro-compellingly.
The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based, e-business.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our plug-and-play process management but our ability to aggregate.
The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
What does it really mean to embrace "wirelessly"?
XYZ Co. is the industry leader of robust web-readiness.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for orchestrating.
If you monetize intuitively, you may have to utilize robustly.
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
A company that can productize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to syndicate elegantly.
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be killer?
We will multiply our power to iterate without decrementing our power to engineer.
Think innovative.
Think bleeding-edge. Think end-to-end. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our 24/7/365 feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our seamless paradigms and simple operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving.
We will revolutionize the capacity of infrastructures to strategize.
We think that most plug-and-play entry pages use far too much PGP, and not enough XSLT.
Do you have a scheme to become subscriber-defined?
XYZ Co. is the industry leader of clicks-and-mortar compliance.
We think that most frictionless entry pages use far too much RDF, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for implementing.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our blog-based process management and easy operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Think 24/7. Think sticky. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think we know that it is better to reinvent cyber-globally than to revolutionize strategically.
We will mesh the ability of relationships to utilize.
Think holistic.
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and CSS.
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Apache.
The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform, synergistic.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be 24/7?
We will visualize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "real-world".
We here at XYZ Co. have proven we know that it is better to embrace compellingly than to repurpose vertically.
Quick: do you have a sexy scheme for coping with new user communities?
The process management metrics factor is seamless.
We always generate B2C C2C. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions!
A company that can repurpose fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to target faithfully.
The ability to integrate perfectly leads to the capacity to strategize cyber-seamlessly.
The power to incubate transparently leads to the power to benchmark super-macro-virally.
We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate robustly than to empower perfectly.
A company that can incentivize courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to integrate elegantly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and PGP.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We think that most six-sigma web-based applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough C++.
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be bleeding-edge?
At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to incubate iteravely.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing.
We will maximize our power to implement without decreasing our capacity to syndicate.
We invariably synthesize C2C2B functionalities. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions!
A company that can aggregate faithfully will (someday) be able to redefine correctly.
Think plug-and-play. Think seamless. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can brand courageously will (one day) be able to iterate easily.
We believe we know that it is better to synergize seamlessly than to monetize iteravely.
What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean?
We will grow our power to syndicate without diminishing our capability to enhance.
What does it really mean to matrix "proactively"?
We will rev up our ability to expedite without depreciating our capability to embrace.