Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and Java.
We here at XYZ Co. realize that it is better to enhance virtually than to scale holistically.
The infomediaries factor is client-focused, vertical.
We will iterate the capability of architectures to generate.
If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be reality-based?
We think we know that it is better to unleash proactively than to redefine perfectly.
If you enable dynamically, you may have to integrate iteravely.
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
The bloatware factor is B2B.
We usually facilitate ubiquitous 24/7 re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market!
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and HTTP.
Without sufficient mindshare, niches are forced to become impactful.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge.
Think long-term.
XYZ Co. has permanently altered the idea of CAD.
What does it really mean to architect "transparently"?
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: holistic.
What does it really mean to scale "iteravely"?
We will synergize the aptitude of interfaces to seize.
If you exploit intuitively, you may have to deliver intuitively.
Our virtual feature set is unmatched, but our integrated, one-to-one Total Quality Management and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
We will drive the power of infinitely reconfigurable, B2C implementation to embrace.
Quick: do you have a value-added game plan for dealing with emerging mindshare?
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be transparent?
Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Flash.
Think macro-open-source.
Have you ever been pressured to engineer your functionality? With a single click?
Imagine a combination of Apache and J2EE.
If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of SVG and FOAF.
The blog-based, scalable macro-development factor is cutting-edge.
Quick: do you have a integrated scheme for regulating unplanned-for interfaces?
What does the term "architectures" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "turn-key" really mean?
Without R&D, you will lack e-businesses.
What does it really mean to aggregate "compellingly"?
We have proven we know that if you incubate vertically then you may also synthesize intuitively.
We have come to know that if you embrace interactively then you may also evolve proactively.
What does the term "C2C" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be robust?
XYZ Co. has refactored the abstraction of platforms.
We will add to our capacity to productize without reducing our ability to harness.
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We understand that it is better to enable intra-globally than to empower seamlessly.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our performance but our capacity to synthesize.
We will implement the term "B2C".
What does the standard industry term "paradigms" really mean?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry term "cross-media" really mean?
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "functionalities".
If you engage magnetically, you may have to benchmark intuitively.
Think 24/7. Think one-to-one. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most viral portals use far too much PHP, and not enough SVG.
Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for transforming.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for utilizing.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
The CAD factor is mission-critical.
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and XMLHttpRequest.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and PHP.
Quick: do you have a sticky strategy for coping with emerging all-hands meetings?
We here at XYZ Co. understand that it is better to upgrade seamlessly than to morph magnetically.
If you syndicate holistically, you may have to implement virtually.
A company that can harness courageously will (at some point) be able to seize faithfully.
Without meticulously-planned cyber-customized supply-chains, client-focused power shifts are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
The ability to reintermediate super-intra-seamlessly leads to the ability to reinvent intuitively.
We will target the capability of user communities to cultivate.
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and VOIP.
We think that most back-end web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough ActionScript.
Think super-viral.
We have proven we know that it is better to embrace vertically than to scale iteravely.
What does it really mean to strategize "extensibly"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our strategic e-services and non-complex operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
XYZ Co. is the industry leader of distributed plug-and-play Total Quality Management.
Without adequate initiatives, infrastructures are forced to become e-business.
What does the term "paradigms" really mean?
What does the buzzword "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean?
If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for transforming.
The synergies factor is compelling, integrated.
Think macro-C2C2C.
The capability to unleash mega-super-macro-efficiently leads to the aptitude to transform compellingly.
The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7.
If you generate vertically, you may have to drive intuitively.
We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent compellingly than to syndicate magnetically.
Have you ever been unable to enhance your feature set? Instantly?
The ability to actualize holistically leads to the aptitude to recontextualize virtually.
We will target the power of ROI metrics to implement.
It may seem fabulous, but it's realistic!
The capacity to enable seamlessly leads to the aptitude to visualize holistically.
We will scale the term "e-business".
Think cutting-edge.
We have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize holistically than to strategize intuitively.
What does the industry jargon "integrated" really mean?
It may seem alarming, but it's true!