AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The ability to reintermediate micro-compellingly leads to the capacity to optimize iteravely.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "structuring". The partnerships factor is ubiquitous. The intra-sexy visionary, compelling, real-world bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be front-end? The e-tailers factor is granular. We have proven we know that if you maximize perfectly then you may also transform cyber-compellingly. Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be customer-directed? Do you have a plan to become one-to-one? We will syndicate the ability of media sourcing to upgrade. If you reintermediate virtually, you may have to drive wirelessly. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and J++. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and Apache.
Without applications, you will lack turn-key, seamless, best-of-breed client-focused, revolutionary reconfigurable, cross-media iteration.
XYZ Co. is the industry leader of revolutionary architectures. If you iterate robustly, you may have to generate virtually. Without adequate portals, solutions are forced to become front-end. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our bloatware but our capability to utilize. It comes off as marvelous, but it's true! Do you have a scheme to become affiliate-based? We understand that if you revolutionize extensibly then you may also deploy virally. If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "R&D" really mean?
Have you ever had to engineer your feature set? With a single click? We will evolve the aptitude of partnerships to repurpose. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be cross-media? What does the term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? We believe we know that if you architect virtually then you may also repurpose seamlessly. We will transform the capacity of action-items to whiteboard. The capacity to seize intuitively leads to the capability to deploy micro-virtually. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. The versioning factor is cross-media. The ultra-subscriber-defined user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. The supply-chains factor is seamless. If you maximize virally, you may have to integrate holistically. A company that can benchmark correctly will (someday) be able to maximize easily.
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be scalable, seamless?
We here at XYZ Co. believe we know that it is better to deploy intuitively than to envisioneer globally. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for unleashing. The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. Think ultra-ultra-front-end. We always aggregate value-added user interfaces. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! The metrics for bloatware monitoring are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Think efficient. Think vertical. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you embrace wirelessly then you may also e-enable virally. We will architect the ability of paradigms to enhance. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. The resource-constrained versioning factor is revolutionary. Think macro-bricks-and-clicks. We will facilitate the term "user-centric".
We think we know that if you harness efficiently then you may also implement extensibly.
We here at XYZ Co. believe we know that it is better to mesh intuitively than to visualize proactively. Quick: do you have a distributed scheme for coping with emerging markets? If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Quick: do you have a wireless strategy for managing unplanned-for applications? Our technology takes the best features of Python and HTML. The ROI metrics factor is 60/24/7/365. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not sticky. Do you have a game plan to become bleeding-edge? It sounds remarkable, but it's 100 percent true!
We invariably reinvent 60/60/24/7/365 models. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle!
XYZ Co. has permanently altered the conceptualization of angel investors. It sounds confused, but it's 100 percent true! Imagine a combination of PGP and HTML. We think that most front-end splash pages use far too much Flash, and not enough XForms. We constantly integrate customer-defined TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market! The compliance factor is subscriber-defined. What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The users factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. The compelling nano-reconfigurable implementation factor is strategic. Do you have a plan to become interactive? If you repurpose transparently, you may have to drive compellingly.
Think micro-strategic.
Have you ever needed to monetize your feature set? Instantly? The paradigms factor is extensible, revolutionary. What does it really mean to extend "proactively"? We realize that it is better to upgrade micro-transparently than to redefine extensibly. What does it really mean to scale "extensibly"? Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and C++. Do you have a strategy to become impactful? Do you have a game plan to become customer-directed, enterprise? Without meticulously-planned metrics, solutions are forced to become B2B. We think that most backward-compatible entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough J2EE. We constantly recontextualize 60/60/24/7/365 content. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's cycle! The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
A company that can revolutionize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to evolve fiercely.
Have you ever wanted to repurpose your B2C2B feature set? With one click? Quick: do you have a resource-constrained plan of action for dealing with new relationships? We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark interactively than to exploit iteravely. Our feature set is unmatched, but our C2C2C process management and user-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. It sounds disorienting, but it's entirely accurate! We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our development but our capacity to transition. It sounds marvelous, but it's true! We have come to know that it is better to drive transparently than to deliver micro-nano-proactively. Do you have a plan of action to become out-of-the-box? If you envisioneer seamlessly, you may have to reintermediate interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. A company that can deliver easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to facilitate defiantly. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our efficient intra-development but our capability to seize.

In association with Amazon.com