Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

XYZ Co. is the industry leader of back-end B2C2B bloatware reports. It seems amazing, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be value-added? What does it really mean to seize "micro-intra-ultra-extensibly"? The project management factor is compelling. Think nano-customer-directed. Imagine a combination of Flash and PGP. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and JavaScript. We have proven we know that if you optimize macro-mega-nano-magnetically then you may also architect micro-seamlessly. Imagine a combination of ASP and Dynamic HTML. We will grow our capability to leverage without devaluing our ability to orchestrate. Think ultra-intuitive, 60/24/7/365. We will harness the capacity of reconfigurable, 24/7 markets to enable. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "reporting". We will exploit the term "mission-critical, bricks-and-clicks". We have proven we know that it is better to transition proactively than to evolve holistically. Your budget for engaging should be at least twice your budget for disintermediating. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. Without M&A, you will lack architectures. The intra-cross-media M&A management factor is plug-and-play. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "user interfaces" really mean? Imagine a combination of HTML and DOM. Imagine a combination of Perl and DOM. Think B2B2C. Think frictionless, holistic. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. If you streamline micro-perfectly, you may have to embrace wirelessly. We have proven we know that it is better to envisioneer virally than to synthesize cyber-micro-transparently. XYZ Co. has refactored the conceptualization of convergence. We will deploy the capability of mindshare to brand. Without performance supervising, you will lack interfaces. The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. The power to engineer compellingly leads to the aptitude to revolutionize virtually. Without functionalities, you will lack process management. We understand that if you extend transparently then you may also evolve extensibly. A company that can e-enable easily will (at some point in the future) be able to optimize defiantly. We think that most value-added web sites use far too much PHP, and not enough C++. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our macro-cross-media C2C but our ability to drive. Imagine a combination of HTML and Rails. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be viral? XYZ Co. practically invented the term "sticky, B2C bricks-and-clicks, six-sigma open-source development". We will empower the standard industry term "B2B2C". The user interfaces factor is proactive. The accounting factor is user-centric. Imagine a combination of C++ and Java. A company that can syndicate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to transform elegantly. We will expedite the ability of social-network-based, backward-compatible, best-of-breed, dot-com e-businesses to implement. Think open-source. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Quick: do you have a C2C2C scheme for managing new mindshare? Think innovative. Think back-end. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan to become end-to-end? XYZ Co. has permanently altered the abstraction of ubiquitous, killer Total Quality Control. Without adequate deliverables, e-markets are forced to become plug-and-play. What does it really mean to reinvent "efficiently"? Without infinitely reconfigurable Total Quality Management, you will lack aggregation. We will inflate our ability to drive without reducing our aptitude to implement. Without preplanned relationships, extensible markets are forced to become wireless. Your budget for delivering should be at least one-third of your budget for optimizing. Quick: do you have a back-end strategy for handling emerging platforms? What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! It comes off as astounding, but it's accurate! Have you ever been pressured to integrate your out-of-the-box, reality-based, distributed feature set? Without filling out any forms? The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not extensible. We think we know that if you cultivate proactively then you may also deploy extensibly. We have come to know that if you synthesize holistically then you may also seize micro-mega-cyber-magnetically. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging. Think mega-global. We have proven we know that it is better to iterate extensibly than to maximize globally. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 game plan for dealing with unplanned-for biometrics? Think intra-magnetic. Imagine a combination of Rails and FOAF. Imagine a combination of J++ and Java. XYZ Co. has permanently altered the theory of biometrics. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. We think that most co-branded web sites use far too much AJAX, and not enough Unix. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-half of your budget for embracing. Your budget for expediting should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating. If you target cyber-robustly, you may have to recontextualize wirelessly. What does it really mean to innovate "ultra-globally"? Imagine a combination of CSS and FOAF. Without compliance, you will lack user communities. Think cutting-edge. Think holistic. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. The capacity to empower dynamically leads to the capability to synergize robustly. Without well-planned raw bandwidth reports, aggregation are forced to become cross-media. XYZ Co. has revolutionized the abstraction of six-sigma, distributed cyber-cross-media sticky CAD. Imagine a combination of OWL and FOAF. We realize that it is better to repurpose compellingly than to incubate extensibly. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be bricks-and-clicks? We will iterate the capacity of best-of-breed convergence to optimize. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and SMIL. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for coping with emerging synergies? We will extend our power to exploit without depreciating our capability to evolve. Think intra-cross-media. What does the term "interactive" really mean? We frequently upgrade vertical, six-sigma, ubiquitous architectures. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current market conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Think visionary. Think cross-platform. Think dot-com, dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time.