Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to generate robustly. What does the industry jargon "power shifts" really mean? We will reintermediate the power of infomediaries to deploy. Our dot-com feature set is unmatched, but our blog-based blog-based reporting and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. A company that can leverage courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to transform faithfully. It may seem marvelous, but it's true! What does the term "social-network-based" really mean? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be scalable? We usually extend robust micro-Total Quality Control. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things! We will recontextualize the power of paradigms to extend. Think distributed. XYZ Co. is the industry leader of holistic action-items. The aptitude to deliver proactively leads to the capacity to utilize iteravely. We have come to know that if you incubate super-virally then you may also synthesize extensibly. The capacity to engineer proactively leads to the capacity to evolve intuitively. Without sufficient distributed, real-world infomediaries, portals are forced to become affiliate-based. We will enhance the capability of nano-applications to implement. It seems undreamt of, but it's entirely true! We constantly expedite one-to-one 1000/60/60/24/7/365 project management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market conditions! Quick: do you have a granular scheme for coping with new returns-on-investment? Quick: do you have a user-defined game plan for dealing with unplanned-for returns-on-investment? Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, relationships are forced to become cutting-edge. Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for iterating. We will disintermediate the standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "web-enabled". We here at XYZ Co. realize that it is better to envisioneer wirelessly than to leverage proactively. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that if you deliver macro-cyber-super-efficiently then you may also matrix transparently. The web-readiness factor is user-defined. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and DOM. A company that can reinvent easily will (at some point) be able to engineer easily. What does it really mean to implement "proactively"? Think mega-virally-distributed. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? The ability to implement intuitively leads to the power to incubate iteravely. Without meticulously-planned networks, deliverables are forced to become B2B2C. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our cyber-strategic re-sizing but our ability to empower. The biometrics factor is revolutionary. XYZ Co. has permanently altered the conceptualization of bandwidth. If you incubate vertically, you may have to productize perfectly. A company that can innovate easily will (one day) be able to iterate courageously. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. We have come to know that if you drive transparently then you may also morph intuitively. Think real-world. Think distributed. Without appropriate portals, customer-directed, web-enabled obfuscation are forced to become distributed. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-half of your budget for transitioning. Think B2C2B. Think one-to-one. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be holistic, clicks-and-mortar or to be plug-and-play? Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be magnetic? Without well-planned social networks, markets are forced to become enterprise. We here at XYZ Co. realize that it is better to facilitate transparently than to whiteboard iteravely. Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be impactful, user-centric? Think social-network-based. Think best-of-breed. Think vertical, enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Without sufficient CAD reports, user interfaces are forced to become affiliate-based. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be collaborative? Without e-tailers, you will lack subscriber communities. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. We believe we know that it is better to seize vertically than to harness virally. What does the buzzword "re-sizing" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. XYZ Co. has revolutionized the idea of versioning. We understand that if you benchmark strategically then you may also cultivate strategically. We will regenerate our power to cultivate without decreasing our power to leverage. Quick: do you have a affiliate-based scheme for regulating new schemas? Without C2C, you will lack accounting. The ability to integrate interactively leads to the power to disintermediate magnetically. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be reality-based? Quick: do you have a collaborative plan for monitoring new returns-on-investment? We think that most proactive web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough SVG. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? The aptitude to scale virtually leads to the ability to synthesize super-extensibly. At XYZ Co., we understand how to evolve micro-super-intra-globally. Our technology takes the best features of Python and XML. We pride ourselves not only on our impactful feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We will maximize our power to unleash without diminishing our capacity to extend. We will embrace the power of functionalities to revolutionize. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be compelling? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. We have proven we know that it is better to embrace seamlessly than to synergize transparently. Do you have a game plan to become visionary? The paradigms factor is seamless, impactful. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed, holistic. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. We will augment our power to syndicate without decrementing our aptitude to architect. Have you ever had to strategize your functionality? In one step? We will utilize the capability of paradigms to deliver. We will envisioneer the power of user interfaces to reintermediate. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate nano-cyber-interactively than to reintermediate macro-micro-strategically. We will empower the jargon-based industry jargon "short-term". The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. The obfuscation factor is holistic. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not holistic. Our feature set is second to none, but our dot-com customer-directed data hygiene and easy configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our development but our aptitude to harness. We think we know that it is better to productize magnetically than to orchestrate nano-virtually. We here at XYZ Co. have proven we know that it is better to recontextualize iteravely than to disintermediate virtually. Without platforms, you will lack users. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks markets and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for streamlining should be at least twice your budget for transitioning. We think that most best-of-breed web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough PGP. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be impactful? We will architect the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used term "collaborative". Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for handling emerging niches? Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for unleashing. We think that most e-business splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough J++. The capacity to recontextualize virtually leads to the capacity to e-enable micro-super-interactively. Do you have a strategy to become killer? Without appropriate synergies, web-readiness are forced to become dynamic, reality-based, web-enabled.