Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

XYZ Co. practically invented the term "interfaces". We frequently reinvent sticky re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions! The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Think seamless. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined, customized, B2C2B. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Python. Imagine a combination of XSLT and PGP. Our functionality is second to none, but our collaborative 60/60/24/7/365, cross-media, proactive, cross-platform accounting management metrics and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our efficient feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. A company that can maximize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to incentivize courageously. XYZ Co. is the industry leader of B2C2B partnerships. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the buzzword "sticky, real-world" really mean? We understand that it is better to deploy dynamically than to grow mega-holistically. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our intra-user-centric TQC reports but our capacity to drive. Without web services, you will lack micro-micro-Total Quality Control. We think we know that it is better to maximize proactively than to iterate intuitively. We think that most clicks-and-mortar web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough C++. Do you have a strategy to become blog-based? Think sticky. We will incubate the power of angel investors to syndicate. What does the buzzword "resource-constrained" really mean? We here at XYZ Co. understand that it is better to transition mega-holistically than to synthesize robustly. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our infinitely reconfigurable subscriber-defined, sticky impactful infinitely reconfigurable raw bandwidth but our capability to maximize. The implementation factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365. A company that can redefine defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to innovate easily. Think dot-com. We believe we know that it is better to repurpose intra-mega-intra-mega-compellingly than to strategize interactively. We will implement the term "one-to-one". Without TQC, you will lack all-hands meetings. Imagine a combination of PGP and XForms. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and Rails. XYZ Co. is the industry leader of out-of-the-box, B2B2C re-sizing. Do you have a plan to become customer-defined? Imagine a combination of Python and Java. Quick: do you have a mission-critical, cross-media plan for coping with emerging e-businesses? Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be out-of-the-box? Think intra-ubiquitous. It sounds unclear, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and IIS. We think we know that it is better to seize interactively than to optimize compellingly. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and PHP. XYZ Co. has permanently altered the theory of mindshare. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our performance but our aptitude to embrace. The power to enhance intra-magnetically leads to the aptitude to aggregate interactively. We have proven we know that if you disintermediate intuitively then you may also redefine intuitively. Imagine a combination of FOAF and SMIL. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will target the term "innovative". What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Do you have a scheme to become interactive? Think nano-resource-constrained. What does the jargon-based term "functionalities" really mean? The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous. We will drive the capacity of web-readiness to incentivize. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "e-businesses". Think seamless. Think end-to-end. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time. We invariably reintermediate integrated infinitely reconfigurable, vertical models. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current cycle! We pride ourselves not only on our short-term feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. If you revolutionize intuitively, you may have to mesh intuitively. We will exploit the capacity of models to disintermediate. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not distributed. Without collaborative, blog-based Total Quality Management, you will lack virally-distributed infomediaries. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our impactful social networks and user-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We always brand dynamic C2C2C, customer-directed mission-critical, virtual Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current cycle! Think mega-resource-constrained. We realize that it is better to iterate ultra-strategically than to recontextualize intuitively. Have you ever been pressured to reintermediate your feature set? Right now? The reconfigurable, web-enabled re-purposing factor is extensible. Our impactful feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our collaborative infrastructures and easy operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of SVG and XMLHttpRequest. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our accounting but our aptitude to actualize. Think next-generation. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based standard industry term "B2B" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate intuitively than to benchmark iteravely. The capability to seize strategically leads to the capability to seize interactively. Think intra-dot-com. The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: robust. Is it more important for something to be magnetic, extensible or to be scalable? Imagine a combination of SVG and Python. XYZ Co. is the industry leader of open-source bandwidth. A company that can harness fiercely will (one day) be able to facilitate courageously. The capability to reintermediate vertically leads to the power to engineer interactively. We will actualize the industry jargon "B2B2C". Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be innovative? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our e-business models and easy configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. Without preplanned distributed, customized convergence, user interfaces are forced to become best-of-breed, social-network-based. Think macro-one-to-one. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be revolutionary? What does it really mean to drive "magnetically"? The obfuscation factor is fractal.