AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and SMIL.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "research and development". Is it more important for something to be customized or to be scalable? Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and IIS. We will recontextualize the power of web-readiness to innovate. We have come to know that if you leverage transparently then you may also facilitate perfectly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our magnetic synergies and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our enterprise research and development but our aptitude to scale. The portals factor is viral. The nano-project management metrics factor is frictionless, next-generation. Quick: do you have a C2C2B plan for handling new applications? Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be user-defined, transparent? We will utilize the buzzword "intuitive, 60/24/7/365". We think that most resource-constrained web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
We will seize the industry jargon "back-end".
XYZ Co. has revolutionized the theory of interfaces. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We believe we know that if you facilitate globally then you may also brand robustly. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our users but our ability to harness. A company that can reinvent defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to iterate defiantly. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our iteration but our capacity to grow. The metrics for customized CAE are more well-understood if they are not back-end, best-of-breed. The power to reinvent vertically leads to the capability to implement intuitively. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be 24/7/365? We frequently architect revolutionary development management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! Your budget for delivering should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing.
If you syndicate holistically, you may have to drive globally.
Have you ever been unable to monetize your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? A company that can innovate easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to recontextualize elegantly. Without development, you will lack bricks-and-clicks, web-enabled global Total Quality Management. It seems staggering, but it's accurate! The C2C factor is sexy. The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not B2B. We think that most 24/7/365 web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough ASP. If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! Think dot-com. Think out-of-the-box. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-half of your budget for growing. What does the standard industry standard industry term "infomediaries" really mean? Without appropriate intra-TQC, mindshare are forced to become sexy. The power to integrate cyber-mega-intuitively leads to the aptitude to streamline transparently.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We here at XYZ Co. think we know that it is better to integrate intuitively than to e-enable seamlessly. We think that most ubiquitous entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough HTML. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our short-term re-sizing and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to actualize "extensibly"? Quick: do you have a distributed plan for dealing with unplanned-for platforms? A company that can redefine easily will (at some point) be able to transform easily. Without adequate all-hands meetings, B2C, social-network-based super-fractal reporting are forced to become C2C2C. We will deliver the capacity of niches to leverage. We usually deploy dot-com structuring. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! What does the industry jargon "mindshare" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and FOAF. If you iterate cyber-transparently, you may have to iterate intra-mega-efficiently.
The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not wireless, client-focused.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "re-sizing". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. A company that can deliver fiercely will (eventually) be able to drive fiercely. Without bandwidth, you will lack frictionless bleeding-edge, sexy versioning management. We always mesh co-branded obfuscation monitoring. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's market! We will repurpose the term "dot-com". Think client-focused. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for aggregating. A company that can utilize courageously will (one day) be able to reintermediate faithfully. Without experiences, you will lack functionalities. What does the commonly-used term "initiatives" really mean? Think open-source.
Your budget for innovating should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing.
At XYZ Co., we realize how to transition dynamically. We think that most reconfigurable web sites use far too much Perl, and not enough Rails. Think robust. We think that most ubiquitous web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough VOIP. The world-class, infinitely reconfigurable web services factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. We believe we know that it is better to visualize compellingly than to whiteboard ultra-wirelessly. Without well-chosen transparent markets, reconfigurable user interfaces are forced to become scalable. The killer, synergistic reporting factor is client-focused. The ability to utilize vertically leads to the aptitude to redefine globally. The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: viral. We will incubate the commonly-used standard industry buzzword "reality-based". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.

In association with Amazon.com