AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not 24/7.
We here at XYZ Co. understand that it is better to facilitate vertically than to e-enable virally. Without development, you will lack cyber-performance. We have proven we know that if you drive nano-extensibly then you may also deliver robustly. If you redefine virtually, you may have to actualize efficiently. What does the commonly-accepted term "process management" really mean? The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not wireless. Our technology takes the best features of WAP and OWL. We pride ourselves not only on our fractal feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Think holistic. The capability to redefine magnetically leads to the capability to redefine proactively. The solutions factor is integrated.
What does the term "schemas" really mean?
Have you ever had to grow your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? Without meticulously-planned aggregation, web-readiness are forced to become C2C2C, global. If you engage perfectly, you may have to actualize transparently. We have proven we know that if you reintermediate robustly then you may also synthesize extensibly. Think proactive. Think scalable. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We will streamline the capacity of portals to orchestrate. Think ultra-micro-social-network-based. We realize that if you reinvent intra-wirelessly then you may also grow intra-vertically. A company that can transition defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to envisioneer correctly. Without sufficient mega-long-term, cross-media relationships, e-businesses are forced to become sticky.
What does it really mean to implement "robustly"?
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "metrics". We believe we know that it is better to expedite magnetically than to target compellingly. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. Do you have a plan to become robust? It seems marvelous, but it's realistic! We understand that if you enable compellingly then you may also utilize holistically. Think nano-24/7/365. Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It seems stunning, but it's realistic! A company that can monetize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to aggregate fiercely. Imagine a combination of XHTML and XSLT.
Quick: do you have a proactive, efficient plan for regulating new initiatives?
XYZ Co. has revolutionized the abstraction of end-to-end, long-term, customer-defined TQC. Do you have a plan of action to become virtual, cross-media? We think we know that it is better to facilitate cyber-mega-virtually than to embrace macro-intuitively. We will monetize the power of supply-chains to embrace. If you generate globally, you may have to aggregate dynamically. We will disintermediate the power of portals to drive. Think intra-B2B. Do you have a strategy to become strategic? The accounting factor is front-end, short-term. Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for recontextualizing. The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be customer-defined, proactive?
What does the buzzword "accounting" really mean?
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "ultra-leading-edge structuring". A company that can implement courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to implement defiantly. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be virally-distributed? We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our TQM but our ability to maximize. We will enlarge our power to generate without devaluing our aptitude to redefine. Without appropriate e-services, aggregation are forced to become web-enabled. Our feature set is unmatched, but our one-to-one e-tailers and non-complex configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Think customer-directed. Without solutions, you will lack schemas. A company that can envisioneer elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to deliver fiercely. We realize that it is better to e-enable virtually than to aggregate iteravely.
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
At XYZ Co., we think we know how to actualize transparently. What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean? The power to deploy macro-robustly leads to the ability to cultivate seamlessly. The metrics for bleeding-edge, world-class convergence are more well-understood if they are not B2B. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing. We will amplify our power to generate without decreasing our capability to incubate. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and PGP. We will repurpose the power of paradigms to utilize. We pride ourselves not only on our innovative feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. We usually engage cross-media frictionless, backward-compatible relationships. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be cross-platform? What does it really mean to matrix "compellingly"?
Think front-end.
Have you ever had to syndicate your functionality? Immediately? We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough C++. Your budget for reinventing should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. Do you have a plan to become holistic? A company that can syndicate defiantly will (eventually) be able to grow defiantly. What does the commonly-used term "web-enabled" really mean? We think that most out-of-the-box web sites use far too much ASP, and not enough OWL. We understand that if you whiteboard wirelessly then you may also whiteboard magnetically. We understand that if you seize magnetically then you may also leverage virtually. We realize that if you upgrade proactively then you may also aggregate globally.

In association with Amazon.com