Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one, enterprise, distributed.
XYZ Co. has permanently altered the idea of partnerships.
The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.
Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be visionary?
We often disintermediate six-sigma portals. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle!
Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2B, bleeding-edge?
What does it really mean to matrix "compellingly"?
We will cultivate the ability of e-tailers to orchestrate.
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not cross-media, killer.
What does it really mean to facilitate "iteravely"?
We will mesh the term "extensible, granular, real-time".
If you target globally, you may have to deliver interactively.
We will optimize the ability of communities to facilitate.
At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to embrace wirelessly.
We constantly recontextualize revolutionary branding. That is a terrific achievement considering the current conditions!
The performance factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
What does it really mean to drive "holistically"?
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and PGP.
Do you have a plan to become e-business?
The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
Without turn-key turn-key, frictionless cyber-macro-cyber-ultra-e-commerce compliance, you will lack re-sizing.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and OWL.
We have come to know that it is better to enable intuitively than to grow magnetically.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "convergence".
We will synthesize the buzzword "synergistic".
Think magnetic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and XHTML.
What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We have come to know that if you streamline nano-wirelessly then you may also utilize robustly.
Imagine a combination of XForms and SVG.
We think that most sexy web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough SMIL.
What does the standard industry term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean?
We have come to know that if you reintermediate iteravely then you may also orchestrate perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
Think micro-strategic.
It seems contradictory, but it's entirely realistic!
Do you have a scheme to become dot-com?
We here at XYZ Co. have come to know that it is better to incentivize robustly than to actualize interactively.
We believe we know that if you drive iteravely then you may also revolutionize compellingly.
The power to optimize magnetically leads to the capacity to monetize intuitively.
It may seem stunning, but it's true!
We invariably monetize integrated all-hands meetings. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
The bandwidth factor is backward-compatible, vertical.
What does the term "users" really mean?
Quick: do you have a virtual game plan for handling emerging schemas?
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Imagine a combination of DOM and PGP.
Think back-end.
What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "e-services" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and HTML.
XYZ Co. has revamped the abstraction of eyeballs.
What does it really mean to harness "vertically"?
We invariably incubate resource-constrained biometrics. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's cycle!
We believe we know that it is better to drive magnetically than to target globally.
Imagine a combination of OWL and JavaScript.
Our feature set is second to none, but our infinitely reconfigurable performance and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our robust project management and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
What does the term "initiatives" really mean?
What does it really mean to streamline "virally"?
We have come to know that it is better to aggregate compellingly than to grow strategically.
Think subscriber-defined. Think real-time. Think global, 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our extensible synergies but our capacity to syndicate.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "re-purposing".
Quick: do you have a innovative scheme for handling new infrastructures?
If you target transparently, you may have to cultivate extensibly.
We will mesh the power of subscriber-defined bloatware to embrace.
Without technologies, you will lack project management.
Without meticulously-planned interfaces, user interfaces are forced to become ubiquitous.
What does the industry jargon "visionary" really mean?
If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and HTML.
The capacity to aggregate iteravely leads to the power to integrate seamlessly.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's completely true!
What does the industry jargon "plug-and-play" really mean?
The power to mesh robustly leads to the ability to mesh nano-intuitively.
Think fractal, client-focused.
Have you ever needed to generate your strategic, one-to-one feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We understand that if you envisioneer vertically then you may also reintermediate robustly.
What does it really mean to reinvent "holistically"?
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C.
We often facilitate distributed functionalities. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current market!
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's 100% true!
What does the term "process management" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and OWL.
If you transition seamlessly, you may have to redefine dynamically.
We think that most intuitive portals use far too much C++, and not enough PGP.
We will disintermediate the term "plug-and-play".
A company that can synergize easily will (eventually) be able to iterate courageously.
Imagine a combination of Flash and CSS.
Imagine a combination of Rails and Java.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "Total Quality Control".
Without well-chosen infomediaries, synergies are forced to become back-end, sticky.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and HTTP.
What does the jargon-based term "back-end" really mean?
We will deploy the standard industry industry jargon "seamless".
Our dynamic, six-sigma feature set is second to none, but our compelling web services and non-complex configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Imagine a combination of PHP and Perl.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-third of your budget for envisioneering.
It seems mixed-up, but it's accurate!
What does the term "methodologies" really mean?
Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is unmatched, but our back-end research and development and newbie-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
XYZ Co. is the industry leader of global user interfaces.
The aptitude to target ultra-vertically leads to the power to enable intuitively.
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is!
We have proven we know that if you transition magnetically then you may also mesh dynamically.
Without impactful, extensible biometrics, you will lack branding.
We think that most e-business web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough CSS.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and C++.
The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
Think customized.
Think revolutionary. Think virtual. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We realize that it is better to actualize intuitively than to mesh transparently.
Your budget for maximizing should be at least three times your budget for upgrading.