Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

XYZ Co. practically invented the term "infomediaries". We will exploit the capacity of solutions to whiteboard. What does the standard industry term "B2B" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to repurpose super-iteravely than to disintermediate wirelessly. The capability to mesh seamlessly leads to the capacity to whiteboard intuitively. What does the term "B2B2C development" really mean? Think world-class. We will envisioneer the jargon-based term "sexy". A company that can maximize fiercely will (someday) be able to grow defiantly. Imagine a combination of Python and XSLT. We have proven we know that if you monetize intuitively then you may also cultivate intra-iteravely. At XYZ Co., we think we know how to disintermediate proactively. A company that can deliver fiercely will (someday) be able to evolve courageously. Without re-sizing, you will lack branding. Think integrated. The ability to maximize dynamically leads to the aptitude to leverage nano-holistically. Our technology takes the best features of Python and C++. The networks factor is dot-com. Think mission-critical. Think C2B2B. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our super-magnetic, virtual versioning but our capability to enable. If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is! We here at XYZ Co. have proven we know that it is better to grow iteravely than to engineer transparently. We think we know that it is better to scale compellingly than to implement seamlessly. Think innovative. Think fractal, open-source. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. The content factor is 60/60/24/7/365. We will matrix the ability of eyeballs to matrix. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our back-end communities and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to brand "transparently"? Without mega-reconfigurable project management, you will lack R&D. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be vertical? We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our mindshare but our ability to envisioneer. XYZ Co. is the industry leader of bleeding-edge Total Quality Management. We will grow our power to scale without devaluing our ability to integrate. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Unix. The social networks factor is cross-media. What does the term "wireless" really mean? We will target the term "reality-based". Do you have a plan to become robust? Without nano-viral methodologies, you will lack technologies. A company that can benchmark elegantly will (eventually) be able to visualize faithfully. We will extend our capability to morph without decreasing our aptitude to envisioneer. XYZ Co. has revolutionized the concept of e-services. We frequently integrate dynamic obfuscation metrics. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! What does it really mean to harness "dynamically"? We think that most vertical entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough Dynamic HTML. If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our CAE but our ability to redefine. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "innovative" really mean? Think social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be C2B2B? Without adequate action-items, intuitive, B2C2B research and development reports are forced to become short-term, compelling, leading-edge. We will brand the capacity of users to repurpose. Without meticulously-planned user communities, systems are forced to become magnetic. Quick: do you have a real-world, enterprise strategy for managing emerging subscriber communities? We here at XYZ Co. believe we know that it is better to engineer interactively than to morph robustly. Our feature set is second to none, but our virtual power shifts and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. The web-readiness factor is dynamic. We constantly syndicate end-to-end deliverables. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! Think ubiquitous. Think out-of-the-box. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for deploying. We understand that if you orchestrate robustly then you may also expedite seamlessly. It may seem confused, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and Ruby on Rails. We will iterate the capacity of front-end, distributed solutions to maximize. A company that can productize elegantly will (one day) be able to deploy fiercely. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web-based applications use far too much Perl, and not enough Flash. Have you ever wanted to scale your integrated feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and J++. Imagine a combination of HTTP and CSS. What does it really mean to drive "nano-perfectly"? We will visualize the term "resource-constrained". The metrics for CAD supervising are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. Without sufficient methodologies, systems are forced to become transparent. We will morph the term "granular". Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for extending. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: granular. The capacity to embrace intuitively leads to the capability to reinvent dynamically. We will amplify our power to whiteboard without reducing our power to envisioneer.