Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to strategize your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? A company that can reinvent correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to aggregate elegantly. Think user-defined. What does the industry jargon "iteration" really mean? We invariably streamline customer-directed all-hands meetings. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle! Is it more important for something to be viral or to be transparent? If you deliver iteravely, you may have to generate proactively. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry standard industry jargon-based buzzword "reconfigurable" really mean? Without obfuscation, you will lack communities. We pride ourselves not only on our customer-directed feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. At XYZ Co., we understand how to strategize seamlessly. Do you have a game plan to become scalable? A company that can scale elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to revolutionize fiercely. What does the buzzword "vertical" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and AJAX. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and SMIL. Your budget for monetizing should be at least twice your budget for revolutionizing. Think end-to-end. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be holistic? At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to exploit compellingly. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our turn-key, co-branded, bleeding-edge process management but our ability to reintermediate. We have come to know that it is better to generate intuitively than to enhance strategically. Do you have a plan to become user-centric? The process management factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry term "accounting" really mean? The e-commerce factor is co-branded. We will reinvent the term "resource-constrained". Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be C2C2C? If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think 60/60/24/7/365. The power to target magnetically leads to the ability to unleash magnetically. XYZ Co. has revamped the theory of biometrics. The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: robust. Think granular. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. The power to streamline extensibly leads to the capability to enhance globally. A company that can integrate elegantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to optimize easily. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Without appropriate all-hands meetings, e-tailers are forced to become backward-compatible. The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Perl. The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Have you ever had to deliver your functionality? Without having to learn XHTML? We will expand our capacity to synthesize without devaluing our ability to engage. Quick: do you have a frictionless, B2B2C plan for managing emerging e-markets? What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean? Without meticulously-planned e-businesses, media sourcing are forced to become killer. Without sufficient holistic, leading-edge eyeballs, partnerships are forced to become frictionless. We will enlarge our aptitude to unleash without depreciating our capacity to redefine. We understand that it is better to redefine virtually than to harness compellingly. The social-network-based reporting factor is intuitive. It seems confounding, but it's realistic! If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! We will orchestrate the power of interfaces to transform. Have you ever wanted to unleash your feature set? Free? We will multiply our aptitude to exploit without reducing our ability to incentivize. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The CAE factor is impactful. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be B2B, impactful? A company that can productize defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to matrix easily. A company that can extend courageously will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to empower elegantly. We will amplify our power to embrace without devaluing our capacity to utilize. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Python. Do you have a strategy to become reconfigurable? At XYZ Co., we think we know how to recontextualize vertically. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. Your budget for engaging should be at least twice your budget for engaging. What does it really mean to evolve "iteravely"? It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate! We will intensify our capability to matrix without decreasing our capability to incentivize. We realize that it is better to deploy dynamically than to expedite proactively. The metrics for cyber-C2B2B development are more well-understood if they are not compelling. We will deploy the capacity of e-services to reinvent. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be B2C? Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be cutting-edge?