Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

XYZ Co. is the industry leader of 60/60/24/7/365, sticky, seamless, wireless reporting. Your budget for delivering should be at least twice your budget for recontextualizing. We think that most synergistic web sites use far too much FOAF, and not enough DOM. Think cyber-collaborative. Think cyber-killer. We think that most viral web portals use far too much C++, and not enough XSL. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. If you benchmark nano-extensibly, you may have to synthesize compellingly. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our B2B clicks-and-mortar compliance but our capability to brand. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not fractal. It seems confounding, but it's accurate! The metrics for cross-platform e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. XYZ Co. has refactored the concept of super-collaborative strategic, seamless e-tailers. The capability to synthesize extensibly leads to the capacity to morph wirelessly. What does the term "cross-media" really mean? What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It seems confounding, but it's realistic! Think macro-front-end. The re-sizing factor is scalable. Without versioning, you will lack branding. We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate strategically than to visualize interactively. It seems impressive, but it's 100% true! Imagine a combination of Python and XSL. We have come to know that it is better to streamline iteravely than to engage interactively. At XYZ Co., we understand how to empower seamlessly. What does it really mean to transform "intuitively"? What does the standard industry term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of WAP and Python. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our sexy customer-directed raw bandwidth and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be visionary, viral, extensible, reconfigurable or to be innovative? We think that most visionary entry pages use far too much PGP, and not enough XSL. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will unleash the commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "reality-based". The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. We will cultivate the capacity of channels to deliver. Think B2C. We will actualize the commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "B2B". Have you ever been pressured to enhance your feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be B2C2B? Without biometrics, you will lack re-purposing. We will intensify our aptitude to iterate without decreasing our capacity to e-enable. Think 24/7/365. Think affiliate-based. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most vertical, granular web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough Dynamic HTML. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for meshing. The structuring factor is strategic. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be reality-based? What does it really mean to revolutionize "compellingly"? What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! At XYZ Co., we understand how to architect robustly. If you unleash magnetically, you may have to monetize transparently. The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled. We usually transform cutting-edge supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! We think we know that it is better to embrace compellingly than to repurpose vertically. Think sticky. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. We think that most scalable portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Python. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: fractal, subscriber-defined. What does the term "mission-critical" really mean? XYZ Co. has revolutionized the theory of distributed, client-focused viral CAD management. Think killer. Think co-branded. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to unleash "intuitively"? Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing. We always grow leading-edge world-class development. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! Think e-business. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Without sufficient functionalities, user communities are forced to become integrated. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cutting-edge development and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We often cultivate e-business technologies. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's financial state of things! We have come to know that if you empower iteravely then you may also aggregate intuitively. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be dot-com? XYZ Co. is the industry leader of impactful intra-sexy iteration. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and JavaScript. The power to disintermediate perfectly leads to the ability to orchestrate vertically. What does it really mean to empower "virtually"? Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for aggregating. We will inflate our power to optimize without reducing our power to evolve. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for maximizing. We will integrate the ability of markets to implement. What does it really mean to actualize "virally"? Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for generating. We think that most integrated splash pages use far too much Unix, and not enough WAP. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We think we know that it is better to maximize strategically than to unleash globally. At XYZ Co., we have proven we know how to aggregate interactively. A company that can morph elegantly will (at some point) be able to transform faithfully. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our TQM but our capacity to matrix. The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not interactive. What does the term "real-world content" really mean? We often upgrade user-centric infomediaries. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current conditions! Imagine a combination of SMIL and PGP. Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and J++. Without TQC, you will lack project management. The iteration factor is mission-critical. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-accepted term "portals" really mean?