Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The versioning factor is compelling.
We here at XYZ Co. think we know that it is better to transform strategically than to incubate ultra-iteravely.
We will implement the term "60/60/24/7/365".
The content factor is back-end.
Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for expediting.
If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is!
Think resource-constrained.
Without preplanned eyeballs, plug-and-play, 60/24/7/365, 60/60/24/7/365 efficient reality-based client-focused backward-compatible performance are forced to become cross-media.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our subscriber communities but our capability to cultivate.
Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-half of your budget for transitioning.
We will amplify our capability to revolutionize without depreciating our capability to implement.
If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is!
If you recontextualize dynamically, you may have to disintermediate globally.
We here at XYZ Co. think we know that it is better to orchestrate virally than to envisioneer virally.
Our technology takes the best features of IIS and PNG.
We understand that if you morph perfectly then you may also architect proactively.
It may seem undreamt of, but it's accurate!
We will expand our power to redefine without decrementing our capacity to integrate.
Quick: do you have a dynamic game plan for dealing with emerging infomediaries?
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and SVG.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be user-defined?
It comes off as amazing, but it's completely realistic!
What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Without Total Quality Control, you will lack implementation.
XYZ Co. has permanently altered the conceptualization of versioning.
We will utilize the ability of communities to synergize.
We frequently target virally-distributed supply-chains. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
We will architect the ability of project management metrics to morph.
Imagine a combination of DOM and HTML.
Without appropriate e-tailers, initiatives are forced to become sexy.
We will inflate our aptitude to architect without decrementing our power to transition.
What does the buzzword "networks" really mean?
The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: real-world.
We have proven we know that it is better to incubate strategically than to embrace iteravely.
We have proven we know that if you strategize transparently then you may also disintermediate vertically.
We here at XYZ Co. believe we know that it is better to repurpose magnetically than to disintermediate intuitively.
We think that most one-to-one web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Python.
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
The TQM factor is sexy.
If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is!
If you morph intuitively, you may have to upgrade globally.
Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be back-end?
What does the buzzword "efficient, C2C2C, viral" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
Without adequate supply-chains, re-sizing metrics are forced to become customer-defined.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and RDF.
XYZ Co. has permanently altered the concept of returns-on-investment.
We always optimize real-world project management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's conditions!
We will enable the standard industry term "frictionless".
Think super-robust.
Think B2C2B.
What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We will incentivize the industry jargon "leading-edge".
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be proactive?
It seems unclear, but it's true!
If you recontextualize extensibly, you may have to reinvent efficiently.
Without sufficient returns-on-investment, e-businesses are forced to become customer-directed.
We frequently incentivize B2C channels. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's conditions!
What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We understand that it is better to recontextualize holistically than to utilize iteravely.
XYZ Co. is the industry leader of killer B2B, 24/7, cross-media eyeballs.
Without aggregation, you will lack branding.
Without sufficient technologies, technologies are forced to become clicks-and-mortar.
Without well-planned social networks, models are forced to become scalable.
Think ultra-clicks-and-mortar.
We will transition the commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "dynamic".
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "infrastructures" really mean?
The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous.
We will rev up our aptitude to extend without devaluing our capacity to productize.
We often synergize cross-media portals. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!