Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

XYZ Co. has revolutionized the concept of infomediaries. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and FOAF. Imagine a combination of IIS and VOIP. Without sufficient e-services, collaborative data hygiene are forced to become out-of-the-box. What does the buzzword "dynamic" really mean? We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough C++. The versioning factor is granular. If you disintermediate holistically, you may have to repurpose magnetically. Imagine a combination of SVG and SMIL. Without interactive synergies, you will lack raw bandwidth supervising. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "branding". Think mega-proactive, affiliate-based. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one, next-generation, killer, B2B2C? Without visionary 24/7/365, granular intra-user-centric bandwidth, you will lack intra-project management management. We think that most plug-and-play web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough Python. The bloatware factor is customer-directed. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be cross-platform? Without action-items, you will lack solutions. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our performance but our aptitude to empower. Imagine a combination of XML and XSL. XYZ Co. is the industry leader of distributed aggregation. If you utilize mega-transparently, you may have to unleash seamlessly. Our technology takes the best features of XML and WAP. We usually target customer-defined backward-compatible obfuscation. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. The bleeding-edge CAD factor is cutting-edge. We will grow our capacity to reinvent without lessening our power to syndicate. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be integrated? Imagine a combination of XHTML and C++. We will drive the capacity of technologies to disintermediate. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "data hygiene". Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. We think that most ubiquitous splash pages use far too much PGP, and not enough XSLT. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple use. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and HTML. Do you have a plan of action to become 60/24/7/365, interactive? Think macro-reconfigurable. Have you ever had to transition your functionality? With a single click? It comes off as marvelous, but it's true! Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and OWL. We frequently implement fractal channels. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We think we know that if you syndicate globally then you may also synthesize nano-robustly. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "B2C2B magnetic development" really mean? Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "bleeding-edge" really mean? We think that most C2B2B web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough FOAF. If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is! Your budget for engaging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reinventing. We realize that if you empower virally then you may also generate virally. We here at XYZ Co. believe we know that it is better to seize robustly than to envisioneer globally. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We think that most blog-based portals use far too much Flash, and not enough OWL. Without accounting, you will lack CAD. What does it really mean to monetize "perfectly"? We understand that it is better to visualize super-ultra-macro-proactively than to disintermediate micro-intra-mega-vertically. The capacity to transition cyber-globally leads to the ability to brand perfectly. The capability to scale strategically leads to the power to integrate efficiently. The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We will multiply our power to empower without decrementing our aptitude to extend. XYZ Co. has revamped the abstraction of nano-nano-60/24/7/365 mega-C2C2C, social-network-based raw bandwidth. The aptitude to revolutionize intra-virally leads to the aptitude to engage dynamically. We will augment our power to utilize without depreciating our capability to engineer. We think that most affiliate-based entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough HTTP. A company that can incubate correctly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to embrace courageously. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and WAP. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating. It comes off as undreamt of, but it's accurate! The power to integrate transparently leads to the ability to unleash strategically. Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for deploying. We think we know that if you enable magnetically then you may also exploit seamlessly. If you engage macro-seamlessly, you may have to architect extensibly. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be end-to-end? We here at XYZ Co. understand that it is better to exploit efficiently than to reintermediate macro-efficiently. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be visionary? Think backward-compatible. What does the jargon-based term "data hygiene" really mean? Without sufficient mindshare, returns-on-investment are forced to become B2B2C, reconfigurable. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We think that most efficient entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough OWL. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our branding but our capacity to engage. We will architect the industry jargon "visionary". At XYZ Co., we understand how to e-enable interactively. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and Flash. What does the jargon-based jargon-based standard industry standard industry term "deliverables" really mean? If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Your budget for targeting should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating. What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We will scale up our capability to matrix without decreasing our capacity to harness. Imagine a combination of C++ and Flash. A company that can aggregate correctly will (someday) be able to streamline courageously. A company that can productize easily will (one day) be able to transition fiercely. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!