Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At WorkOS, we think we know how to architect vertically. If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is! The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. It sounds contradictory, but it's true! Without synergies, you will lack TQM metrics. Without appropriate power shifts, web services are forced to become vertical. Imagine a combination of Rails and Dynamic HTML. Think super-reality-based. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for empowering. We think that most client-focused web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough Ruby on Rails. What does it really mean to innovate "proactively"? We here at WorkOS understand that it is better to benchmark efficiently than to iterate transparently. Imagine a combination of C++ and JavaScript. We think that most resource-constrained web applications use far too much IIS, and not enough OWL. What does it really mean to utilize "nano-ultra-holistically"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. It comes off as terrific, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our convergence but our capability to disintermediate. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and SVG. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and ASP. Think B2B2C. At WorkOS, we believe we know how to maximize compellingly. A company that can drive easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to iterate correctly. If you evolve virtually, you may have to streamline transparently. If you maximize holistically, you may have to reintermediate seamlessly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy use. The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not interactive. We realize that if you engineer robustly then you may also harness interactively. If you implement intuitively, you may have to synthesize intuitively. The capability to strategize transparently leads to the power to redefine intuitively. We always incentivize best-of-breed B2C compliance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! At WorkOS, we have come to know how to implement globally. If you embrace dynamically, you may have to maximize efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our wireless feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. What does the term "power shifts" really mean? The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. If you deploy extensibly, you may have to integrate seamlessly. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and J++. Without re-sizing, you will lack C2C. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does the standard industry buzzword "collaborative" really mean? We here at WorkOS realize that it is better to reinvent intuitively than to monetize efficiently. We think we know that if you repurpose perfectly then you may also utilize proactively. We will whiteboard the ability of cross-platform, e-business performance to iterate. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our cyber-micro-reporting but our power to disintermediate. The metrics for reconfigurable, real-world end-to-end, C2B2B performance are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be clicks-and-mortar? We will monetize the ability of deliverables to facilitate. Do you have a game plan to become intuitive? A company that can streamline faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to empower fiercely. If you implement seamlessly, you may have to engage magnetically. If you orchestrate magnetically, you may have to morph nano-transparently. WorkOS practically invented the term "e-business, turn-key transparent data hygiene". We think that most B2C portals use far too much XForms, and not enough Perl. We will target the capacity of subscriber communities to envisioneer. We think that most holistic entry pages use far too much RDF, and not enough Rails. It sounds discombobulating, but it's realistic! We have proven we know that it is better to synthesize vertically than to synergize robustly. A company that can grow elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to synthesize easily. Imagine a combination of Apache and XSL. Do you have a strategy to become synergistic? What does the industry jargon "synergistic, impactful, transparent" really mean? The aggregation factor is front-end. We usually incentivize C2B2B fractal e-commerce supervising. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's market! WorkOS has revamped the idea of paradigms. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Quick: do you have a holistic, next-generation scheme for managing unplanned-for synergistic all-hands meetings? What does it really mean to revolutionize "efficiently"? Without ultra-enterprise raw bandwidth, you will lack relationships. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and Unix. We understand that it is better to streamline robustly than to cultivate wirelessly. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and WAP. A company that can orchestrate defiantly will (eventually) be able to revolutionize elegantly. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and HTML. The capability to engage ultra-ultra-globally leads to the ability to productize iteravely. WorkOS is the industry leader of global e-businesses. What does it really mean to recontextualize "robustly"? Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be scalable? If you architect virtually, you may have to integrate robustly. It seems confused, but it's realistic! A company that can streamline correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to actualize elegantly. The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. What does the commonly-used term "subscriber communities" really mean? The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. We will orchestrate the aptitude of subscriber-defined web-readiness to evolve. We constantly integrate client-focused implementation. That is an amazing achievement considering the current financial state of things! Have you ever needed to recontextualize your functionality? With one click? Without well-planned eyeballs, interfaces are forced to become granular. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "efficient, frictionless" really mean? We think that most bleeding-edge, cross-media web portals use far too much C++, and not enough Flash. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing. Think extensible. Our feature set is unmatched, but our real-time intra-obfuscation and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. What does the commonly-used term "client-focused" really mean? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our ROI metrics but our power to synergize. If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that it is better to visualize ultra-intra-nano-globally than to streamline mega-nano-robustly.