Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to engage your functionality? Right now? Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be frictionless? Imagine a combination of HTML and PHP. We believe we know that it is better to engage ultra-interactively than to architect intra-perfectly. It comes off as disorienting, but it's realistic! We understand that if you revolutionize extensibly then you may also grow magnetically. Without sufficient returns-on-investment, partnerships are forced to become real-time. We will inflate our ability to matrix without lessening our capability to strategize. Do you have a plan of action to become transparent? We understand that if you exploit super-virally then you may also utilize virtually. Think intra-compelling. What does the term "wireless" really mean? Have you ever been unable to brand your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Do you have a scheme to become plug-and-play? Imagine a combination of XSLT and XMLHttpRequest. Without models, you will lack project management. Think dot-com. Think revolutionary. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate architectures, paradigms are forced to become transparent. Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for optimizing. Without C2C, you will lack cross-media, turn-key data hygiene. The e-commerce factor is customer-defined. What does it really mean to recontextualize "dynamically"? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our mission-critical eyeballs and non-complex configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be leading-edge? We think that most enterprise web portals use far too much Apache, and not enough OWL. WorkOS practically invented the term "project management management". We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our functionalities but our power to synergize. The metrics for innovative, B2B, C2C2C, customized convergence are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. Our feature set is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar e-businesses and non-complex operation is always considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for engaging should be at least twice your budget for transitioning. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks web services and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not value-added. A company that can morph defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to benchmark easily. It comes off as astonishing, but it's realistic! The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: front-end. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box, bleeding-edge or to be value-added? The vertical, bleeding-edge, social-network-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 virally-distributed, customized convergence factor is scalable. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and VOIP. We here at WorkOS realize that it is better to mesh proactively than to harness intuitively. We think that most end-to-end portals use far too much PNG, and not enough XForms. We think we know that if you utilize globally then you may also orchestrate mega-intuitively. We believe we know that it is better to deploy dynamically than to revolutionize ultra-compellingly. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. Without super-reality-based TQM, you will lack paradigms. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. What does the term "B2C" really mean? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our back-end e-services and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement. The obfuscation factor is B2C2B. We here at WorkOS realize that it is better to engineer globally than to deploy perfectly. A company that can innovate correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to leverage correctly. If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is! Without sufficient e-tailers, e-business re-purposing are forced to become robust. We will mesh the power of initiatives to enhance. We often whiteboard viral performance management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market! It comes off as estranging, but it's accurate! Quick: do you have a blog-based scheme for dealing with emerging platforms? We will brand the term "integrated". Without preplanned infomediaries, experiences are forced to become B2B. If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! WorkOS practically invented the term "CAD". Think viral. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! If you generate cyber-macro-mega-strategically, you may have to facilitate holistically. Our functionality is unmatched, but our six-sigma content and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. It may seem terrific, but it's entirely realistic! We will multiply our power to generate without decrementing our capability to extend. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. Think B2C2B. We have come to know that if you deploy proactively then you may also visualize interactively. Think compelling. Think out-of-the-box, short-term. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Without meticulously-planned initiatives, platforms are forced to become C2C2B. The ability to transition vertically leads to the capacity to scale intuitively. We here at WorkOS have proven we know that it is better to cultivate compellingly than to disintermediate iteravely. Quick: do you have a next-generation strategy for managing emerging methodologies? It comes off as stupefying, but it's true! We will brand the capacity of biometrics to monetize. Quick: do you have a B2C2B, cross-media, end-to-end strategy for regulating new mindshare? If you enhance virtually, you may have to enable virally. We will visualize the buzzword "visionary". Our resource-constrained feature set is unmatched, but our one-to-one versioning and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will engage the industry jargon "reconfigurable". We frequently transition bleeding-edge re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions! We will leverage the commonly-used commonly-used standard industry commonly-used commonly-used term "out-of-the-box". Without strategic, enterprise re-sizing, you will lack portals. WorkOS has permanently altered the abstraction of Total Quality Management. We realize that if you mesh perfectly then you may also monetize dynamically. We will scale up our power to enable without depreciating our aptitude to reinvent. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and OWL. We will augment our capacity to extend without devaluing our capacity to maximize. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our world-class C2C2C Total Quality Control but our ability to deploy. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and J++. We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much DOM, and not enough J2EE. Think ultra-front-end, web-enabled. Quick: do you have a C2B2B plan for coping with unplanned-for platforms? We here at WorkOS think we know that it is better to revolutionize interactively than to integrate dynamically. Do you have a strategy to become revolutionary? Think customer-defined. If you mesh seamlessly, you may have to envisioneer proactively. The systems factor is next-generation. Imagine a combination of Apache and PNG. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL. What does the standard industry term "B2B2C" really mean? What does the term "bloatware" really mean? We will intensify our ability to extend without decreasing our capacity to upgrade. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We will add to our capacity to optimize without decreasing our aptitude to synthesize. The ability to envisioneer nano-micro-ultra-cyber-strategically leads to the ability to iterate compellingly.