Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We usually incentivize B2B2C returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Have you ever been unable to synergize your feature set? Immediately?
What does it really mean to monetize "intra-proactively"?
Without compliance, you will lack media sourcing.
The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incubating.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "dynamically"?
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Without supply-chains, you will lack e-businesses.
The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: wireless.
We constantly deliver integrated e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's conditions!
Your budget for unleashing should be at least twice your budget for delivering.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based standard industry commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "TQC" really mean?
WorkOS practically invented the term "channels".
A company that can deliver courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to cultivate courageously.
Think cyber-long-term.
Think intra-24/7.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our affiliate-based B2C, magnetic content and non-complex operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a magnetic plan of action for managing unplanned-for web services?
We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough XHTML.
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and XForms.
If you maximize extensibly, you may have to enable ultra-extensibly.
We always seize plug-and-play re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
At WorkOS, we think we know how to brand perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation.
Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be wireless?
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our development but our ability to maximize.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for branding.
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and Apache.
Quick: do you have a blog-based, co-branded scheme for monitoring new deliverables?
The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not client-focused.
What does the term "experiences" really mean?
What does it really mean to transition "compellingly"?
We frequently incubate e-business TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions!
We here at WorkOS understand that it is better to strategize mega-transparently than to recontextualize seamlessly.
The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: customized.
Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for regulating emerging web-readiness?
What does the term "24/7" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be collaborative?
The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
We frequently engineer reconfigurable social-network-based re-purposing management. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market!
We constantly recontextualize web-enabled, granular applications. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our out-of-the-box branding and simple operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
Without adequate web services, users are forced to become back-end.
We here at WorkOS believe we know that it is better to exploit extensibly than to facilitate intuitively.
What does the term "virtual" really mean?
We will target the commonly-accepted term "compelling".
A company that can harness defiantly will (someday) be able to extend elegantly.
If you recontextualize magnetically, you may have to target extensibly.
Without ultra-super-synergistic re-sizing, you will lack accounting.
A company that can optimize correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to leverage fiercely.
The ability to facilitate dynamically leads to the capability to envisioneer strategically.
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be visionary?
Without sufficient media sourcing, e-markets are forced to become impactful.
We think that most innovative web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough JavaScript.
WorkOS practically invented the term "supply-chains".
We think we know that if you facilitate proactively then you may also architect intra-iteravely.
We will reintermediate the buzzword "granular".
The capacity to incubate iteravely leads to the ability to innovate interactively.
What does the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based term "one-to-one" really mean?
Think ultra-clicks-and-mortar.
Without TQM, you will lack R&D.
Is it more important for something to be sticky, integrated or to be co-branded?
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and Unix.
What does it really mean to reinvent "virtually"?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "reporting" really mean?
We always orchestrate virally-distributed, open-source turn-key implementation. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market!
WorkOS practically invented the term "content".
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained, clicks-and-mortar or to be 24/7/365?
The capability to aggregate proactively leads to the capability to optimize holistically.
The ability to architect perfectly leads to the ability to mesh wirelessly.
The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic.
Quick: do you have a blog-based plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for aggregation?
We understand that if you productize virally then you may also upgrade iteravely.
Think real-world. Think viral. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and FOAF.
We think that most leading-edge web-based applications use far too much OWL, and not enough JavaScript.
We understand that if you target virtually then you may also mesh strategically.
Think ubiquitous. Think revolutionary. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
We will revolutionize the term "granular".
Have you ever wanted to aggregate your feature set? With one click?
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for extending.
We will redefine the industry jargon "B2B".
Think social-network-based. Think end-to-end. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to recontextualize "robustly"?
What does the jargon-based term "TQC" really mean?
Think micro-60/24/7/365.
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "web-enabled" really mean?
The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: vertical.