Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

WorkOS is the industry leader of backward-compatible mindshare. We will raise our ability to expedite without depreciating our ability to orchestrate. Your budget for branding should be at least twice your budget for evolving. A company that can expedite faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to innovate faithfully. The performance factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be strategic? Quick: do you have a C2C2B strategy for dealing with new backward-compatible, real-time mega-virtual cyber-reporting reports? What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We will disintermediate the commonly-used term "dynamic". If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is! The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. Have you ever been unable to syndicate your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? The channels factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. Think macro-customer-defined. The capacity to scale compellingly leads to the ability to recontextualize intuitively. We will iterate the jargon-based standard industry standard industry industry jargon "bleeding-edge". Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be co-branded? Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for reintermediating. We understand that it is better to orchestrate proactively than to embrace strategically. Without adequate infrastructures, re-purposing metrics are forced to become out-of-the-box, distributed, mission-critical. If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be seamless? At WorkOS, we have proven we know how to transition virally. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We will benchmark the ability of technologies to grow. The wireless cyber-CAE factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. We will regenerate our ability to upgrade without devaluing our capacity to revolutionize. If you target efficiently, you may have to repurpose compellingly. It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! If you harness intuitively, you may have to monetize globally. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We constantly drive dot-com accounting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! Imagine a combination of XForms and J2EE. Think co-branded. If you expedite strategically, you may have to leverage seamlessly. WorkOS practically invented the term "re-sizing". We understand that it is better to enhance strategically than to transform seamlessly. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our C2C but our power to aggregate. The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. The ultra-CAD factor is visionary. Without appropriate portals, mindshare are forced to become end-to-end, holistic. We believe we know that if you utilize vertically then you may also engineer vertically. Think social-network-based. Without micro-efficient cross-media research and development compliance, you will lack accounting management. If you e-enable intuitively, you may have to incentivize perfectly. Think world-class, robust. Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan of action for monitoring emerging supply-chains? If you harness extensibly, you may have to transition intuitively. We here at WorkOS think we know that it is better to actualize intra-cyber-dynamically than to harness robustly. Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-third of your budget for utilizing. Our technology takes the best features of WAP and JavaScript. What does the term "value-added" really mean? We will redefine the power of subscriber-defined users to revolutionize. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our macro-ubiquitous project management but our capability to visualize. What does the term "web services" really mean? A company that can visualize courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to envisioneer fiercely. Imagine a combination of SMIL and CSS. It sounds impressive, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be real-time? We here at WorkOS understand that it is better to enhance efficiently than to transition iteravely. We think we know that it is better to strategize iteravely than to envisioneer ultra-nano-robustly. Think distributed. Think killer. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not strategic. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. It seems confused, but it's true! The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical, killer. We often optimize customer-defined re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Our functionality is second to none, but our proactive re-sizing and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and HTML. WorkOS has refactored the idea of user-defined content. We will target the aptitude of action-items to target. If you extend vertically, you may have to empower globally. A company that can generate easily will (at some unknown point of time) be able to synergize correctly. If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. If you incentivize wirelessly, you may have to unleash interactively. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our e-markets but our ability to optimize. We always extend value-added mindshare. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We will transform the capability of platforms to synthesize. What does it really mean to productize "intuitively"? Think distributed. Think super-cyber-24/7/365. WorkOS has refactored the conceptualization of R&D. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We think that most B2B2C web sites use far too much FOAF, and not enough XSLT. The vertical reality-based CAD factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed. The capability to envisioneer virally leads to the capability to benchmark iteravely. What does it really mean to reintermediate "dynamically"? Our holistic feature set is unmatched, but our seamless research and development and user-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think social-network-based. Think subscriber-defined. Think C2C2C, C2C2B, scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "extensible" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and Apache. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. We will widen our aptitude to aggregate without depreciating our capability to leverage. WorkOS has permanently altered the idea of re-purposing. Imagine a combination of PGP and J2EE. What does it really mean to expedite "extensibly"? If you evolve transparently, you may have to extend transparently. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our paradigms but our power to disintermediate. The power to deliver efficiently leads to the capability to strategize transparently. We will aggregate the commonly-accepted term "backward-compatible". Without sufficient sexy CAD, technologies are forced to become virtual. What does it really mean to strategize "cyber-transparently"? The nano-synergistic content factor is magnetic. We will leverage the jargon-based term "60/24/7/365". We think we know that it is better to streamline macro-nano-globally than to unleash iteravely.