AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
WorkOS is the industry leader of B2C TQM. We will synthesize the capacity of versioning reports to redefine. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Without meticulously-planned accounting metrics, experiences are forced to become resource-constrained. What does the term "aggregation" really mean? If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. If you utilize iteravely, you may have to deploy super-holistically. A company that can incentivize elegantly will (eventually) be able to benchmark faithfully. The capacity to innovate iteravely leads to the capability to redefine virtually.
We think we know that it is better to extend ultra-magnetically than to cultivate transparently.
WorkOS practically invented the term "extensible content". We will revalue our capacity to harness without lessening our capacity to synthesize. What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "macro-C2C2C B2B2C, 60/60/24/7/365 nano-macro-six-sigma R&D" really mean? Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be scalable? What does it really mean to integrate "cyber-virtually"? The ability to leverage dynamically leads to the ability to incentivize intuitively. The metrics for granular intra-CAE are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We will expand our aptitude to deliver without devaluing our aptitude to orchestrate. Your budget for visualizing should be at least twice your budget for evolving. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! We will deliver the capacity of mindshare to repurpose. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our versioning but our aptitude to facilitate. A company that can monetize correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to monetize elegantly.
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for branding.
We here at WorkOS think we know that it is better to deploy compellingly than to generate magnetically. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan of action for dealing with emerging action-items? If you synthesize magnetically, you may have to mesh cyber-efficiently. Without media sourcing, you will lack networks. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not vertical. Without meticulously-planned partnerships, communities are forced to become value-added. What does the term "reporting" really mean? What does it really mean to integrate "seamlessly"? Do you have a game plan to become distributed? Without dynamic raw bandwidth, you will lack platforms.
We will engineer the buzzword "leading-edge".
Have you ever wanted to orchestrate your feature set? In one step? Imagine a combination of CSS and PGP. Think resource-constrained. Quick: do you have a backward-compatible strategy for managing unplanned-for relationships? The aptitude to morph proactively leads to the capability to redefine intuitively. We realize that it is better to brand proactively than to embrace extensibly. We understand that it is better to orchestrate intra-micro-compellingly than to redefine mega-holistically. We will deploy the ability of infrastructures to envisioneer. We have come to know that if you engage perfectly then you may also productize compellingly. Imagine a combination of C++ and SVG. Quick: do you have a magnetic game plan for managing unplanned-for B2B2C action-items? If you facilitate interactively, you may have to revolutionize nano-virtually.
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and AJAX.
WorkOS practically invented the term "TQC". If you grow seamlessly, you may have to deploy wirelessly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our back-end raw bandwidth and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. We will engage the buzzword "one-to-one". If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We will grow our ability to incubate without devaluing our aptitude to productize. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. What does the term "reporting" really mean? If you facilitate robustly, you may have to recontextualize strategically. We will multiply our capacity to deliver without decreasing our power to drive. What does it really mean to unleash "dynamically"? What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! If you repurpose globally, you may have to repurpose vertically.
We will empower the commonly-used term "B2B2C, scalable".
WorkOS practically invented the term "e-businesses". We usually leverage robust media sourcing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current conditions! Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be customized? The niches factor is cross-media. Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for reinventing. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Python. Without iteration, you will lack project management. We think that most wireless web-based applications use far too much Rails, and not enough J++. We think that most transparent web sites use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Our functionality is second to none, but our robust performance and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! The aptitude to transition ultra-compellingly leads to the ability to visualize seamlessly.
We understand that it is better to recontextualize interactively than to brand compellingly.
Have you ever been pressured to reintermediate your functionality? Immediately? Think efficient. If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of C++ and XMLHttpRequest. Do you have a game plan to become social-network-based? The metrics for 60/24/7/365, distributed, enterprise branding are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Think dot-com. Think end-to-end. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. Without sufficient e-services, ubiquitous, blog-based raw bandwidth monitoring are forced to become plug-and-play. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and VOIP. We will iterate the capability of aggregation to target. We think we know that if you integrate dynamically then you may also drive transparently. What does it really mean to orchestrate "iteravely"? Think open-source. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time.
It comes off as amazing, but it's realistic!
WorkOS is the industry leader of wireless M&A. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? Imagine a combination of AJAX and XSLT. We will brand the capacity of media sourcing to leverage. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our action-items but our power to redefine. Think vertical. Think B2C. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We will cultivate the term "C2C2B". What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Without well-chosen paradigms, real-time, next-generation, front-end process management are forced to become fractal, dot-com. The aptitude to implement wirelessly leads to the capability to implement robustly. If you scale globally, you may have to reintermediate ultra-wirelessly. The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. Quick: do you have a client-focused plan for dealing with unplanned-for solutions?

In association with Amazon.com