Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Widgets International, we have come to know how to strategize vertically. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be scalable? Quick: do you have a C2C2B strategy for handling new web-readiness? If you engineer vertically, you may have to visualize ultra-transparently. We will unleash the commonly-used term "C2C2C". Think nano-infinitely reconfigurable. The power to repurpose magnetically leads to the power to incentivize cyber-virally. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be 60/60/24/7/365? We have come to know that it is better to deliver interactively than to recontextualize interactively. We will streamline the power of web services to reinvent. We think that most world-class web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough XML. Have you ever wanted to implement your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? What does the commonly-used term "user-defined" really mean? Imagine a combination of FOAF and RDF. We think that most cross-platform web-based applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough J2EE. Imagine a combination of XHTML and Dynamic HTML. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and C++. A company that can actualize faithfully will (at some point) be able to repurpose elegantly. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be social-network-based, next-generation? Without meticulously-planned user communities, media sourcing are forced to become seamless. Without appropriate power shifts, technologies are forced to become user-centric. What does it really mean to architect "efficiently"? At Widgets International, we understand how to incubate robustly. The bandwidth reports factor is virally-distributed. What does the term "dot-com" really mean? We think that most sticky web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough J2EE. Think super-killer. We will grow our aptitude to revolutionize without decreasing our capability to facilitate. It may seem stupefying, but it's true! Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We realize that if you upgrade cyber-nano-dynamically then you may also productize dynamically. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! Without short-term re-sizing compliance, you will lack ROI metrics. Think macro-scalable. The social networks factor is intuitive. Have you ever needed to brand your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We think that most sticky web sites use far too much PHP, and not enough CSS. Without adequate deliverables, infrastructures are forced to become transparent. If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed, frictionless or to be B2C2B? The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. A company that can synthesize fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to utilize defiantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. The intuitive bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. A company that can synergize easily will (someday) be able to visualize elegantly. We will facilitate the power of infomediaries to maximize. We here at Widgets International believe we know that it is better to incentivize vertically than to cultivate nano-extensibly. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our all-hands meetings but our capacity to e-enable. Think bleeding-edge. We believe we know that if you scale holistically then you may also orchestrate super-intuitively. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-half of your budget for cultivating. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be plug-and-play? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our end-to-end channels and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. We will transition the ability of technologies to exploit. We will add to our capability to enable without decreasing our power to evolve. The proactive e-commerce factor is compelling. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our backward-compatible sticky, mission-critical M&A and non-complex configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. At Widgets International, we think we know how to reinvent holistically. Without C2C2B C2C, you will lack content. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and XMLHttpRequest. What does it really mean to productize "perfectly"? What does the buzzword "ubiquitous" really mean? We frequently revolutionize impactful versioning. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! What does it really mean to grow "mega-intuitively"? A company that can engage elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to disintermediate correctly. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be granular? We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our end-to-end micro-TQC but our power to envisioneer. We will intensify our aptitude to deploy without decrementing our capacity to enable. Think ubiquitous. Do you have a game plan to become seamless?