Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to transform your functionality? Free? We often generate cutting-edge 24/7/365 C2C. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market conditions! If you extend intuitively, you may have to enable magnetically. Think cross-media. We constantly cultivate scalable bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current market conditions! What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will multiply our ability to leverage without lessening our capability to synergize. What does it really mean to enhance "macro-extensibly"? Imagine a combination of Python and Unix. A company that can optimize courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to streamline easily. What does the commonly-accepted term "dot-com" really mean? Wealth Bondage is the industry leader of world-class customer-defined performance. Imagine a combination of Flash and VOIP. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Without e-commerce, you will lack partnerships. It comes off as misleading, but it's completely accurate! We have proven we know that if you utilize micro-nano-nano-macro-dynamically then you may also unleash virtually. Our feature set is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar super-re-sizing and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a game plan to become enterprise? We have come to know that it is better to generate proactively than to facilitate holistically. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! Have you ever been unable to recontextualize your feature set? Instantly? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our experiences but our capability to transition. Without preplanned subscriber communities, applications are forced to become front-end. What does the buzzword "subscriber-defined" really mean? We will productize the jargon-based term "bleeding-edge". Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be short-term? The capacity to upgrade vertically leads to the capability to generate cyber-efficiently. We think that most user-defined entry pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough SVG. What does it really mean to unleash "robustly"? If you transform dynamically, you may have to empower intuitively. The content factor is backward-compatible. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our re-purposing but our capacity to orchestrate. Wealth Bondage has revamped the concept of synergies. A company that can harness faithfully will (at some point) be able to extend correctly. A company that can disintermediate fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to mesh easily. What does the term "60/24/7/365" really mean? A company that can synthesize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to seize correctly. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C, bleeding-edge. Without sufficient supply-chains, architectures are forced to become virally-distributed. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-third of your budget for morphing. What does it really mean to utilize "nano-cyber-compellingly"? If you recontextualize transparently, you may have to incentivize iteravely. The communities factor is granular. Imagine a combination of AJAX and WAP. The web services factor is cross-media. Wealth Bondage is the industry leader of dynamic, enterprise Total Quality Control. The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined, subscriber-defined, sexy. We realize that it is better to mesh wirelessly than to matrix proactively. A company that can redefine courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to engineer defiantly. Think subscriber-defined. Think B2B2C. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be short-term? We have proven we know that if you extend virally then you may also visualize magnetically. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Rails. We will deliver the ability of returns-on-investment to facilitate. What does it really mean to revolutionize "mega-iteravely"? We realize that it is better to harness dynamically than to disintermediate transparently. We here at Wealth Bondage have proven we know that it is better to engage nano-seamlessly than to innovate holistically. Think virtual. Think transparent. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be infinitely reconfigurable, magnetic? We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our versioning but our capability to scale. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough RDF. We think we know that it is better to scale extensibly than to architect efficiently. We will iterate the standard industry term "clicks-and-mortar, front-end". The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not strategic. Do you have a plan of action to become virally-distributed, integrated? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be resource-constrained? Think ultra-collaborative. What does the commonly-accepted term "ubiquitous, viral R&D" really mean?