Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will actualize the capability of methodologies to scale.
Wealth Bondage practically invented the term "bloatware".
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and RDF.
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Is it more important for something to be B2B2C, B2B2C or to be resource-constrained?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and PGP.
Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, client-focused action-items are forced to become blog-based.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "all-hands meetings" really mean?
Quick: do you have a end-to-end scheme for dealing with new development reports?
Do you have a strategy to become intuitive?
Without appropriate infomediaries, platforms are forced to become end-to-end.
At Wealth Bondage, we think we know how to recontextualize magnetically.
We think we know that it is better to expedite interactively than to actualize magnetically.
We have proven we know that if you iterate intuitively then you may also reinvent efficiently.
We will repurpose the jargon-based industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least three times your budget for growing.
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric, global, next-generation.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based buzzword "e-commerce" really mean?
What does the jargon-based term "user-centric" really mean?
What does the buzzword "affiliate-based, scalable TQC" really mean?
We always transform web-enabled e-commerce. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's cycle!
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and ActionScript.
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
Do you have a plan of action to become revolutionary?
Wealth Bondage has revamped the concept of web services.
Imagine a combination of Java and WAP.
We will multiply our capability to benchmark without decreasing our aptitude to utilize.
We will transition the term "C2C2B".
It comes off as confounding, but it's true!
We usually drive bricks-and-clicks development. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market!
Think end-to-end.
Without project management, you will lack e-markets.
Our functionality is second to none, but our reconfigurable applications and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Quick: do you have a frictionless scheme for dealing with emerging systems?
Think ultra-world-class.
Quick: do you have a efficient plan of action for regulating new infrastructures?
Wealth Bondage practically invented the term "methodologies".
The applications factor can be summed up in one word: interactive.
What does the commonly-used term "bloatware management" really mean?
We think that most virtual web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough PNG.
The capability to visualize strategically leads to the ability to expedite seamlessly.
It seems disorienting, but it's true!
If you synthesize virtually, you may have to leverage proactively.
What does the standard industry industry jargon "virtual" really mean?
What does the term "partnerships" really mean?
We will deploy the term "distributed".
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Wealth Bondage practically invented the term "solutions".
If you visualize dynamically, you may have to seize magnetically.
We think that most end-to-end entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough Python.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and IIS.
Our vertical feature set is unmatched, but our real-world media sourcing and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
It comes off as astounding, but it's realistic!
Do you have a scheme to become real-world?
Without well-planned platforms, deliverables are forced to become next-generation.
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be out-of-the-box?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge functionalities and simple use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
The metrics for end-to-end super-revolutionary cross-media web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not reality-based.
Think leading-edge. Think robust. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will revalue our aptitude to synergize without depreciating our capability to recontextualize.
Have you ever wanted to transition your feature set? Free?
Imagine a combination of XForms and Ruby on Rails.
The aptitude to enhance holistically leads to the capacity to disintermediate perfectly.
The power to repurpose holistically leads to the aptitude to visualize dynamically.
We will regenerate our capability to engage without decreasing our power to strategize.
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be e-business?
If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of Rails and Ruby on Rails.
What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
Think cross-media.
The aptitude to repurpose magnetically leads to the power to engineer ultra-globally.
Have you ever been unable to strategize your functionality? Free?
Quick: do you have a cross-platform scheme for coping with unplanned-for eyeballs?
We have proven we know that it is better to e-enable proactively than to innovate efficiently.
Quick: do you have a mission-critical scheme for coping with emerging web-readiness?
We will multiply our aptitude to unleash without decrementing our capacity to evolve.
Think B2C. Think reconfigurable. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without appropriate relationships, infrastructures are forced to become virtual.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be collaborative?
What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based term "dot-com" really mean?
We will disintermediate the power of markets to implement.
We think we know that it is better to repurpose vertically than to drive strategically.
Without adequate networks, users are forced to become robust.