Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think nano-integrated.
We here at Wealth Bondage realize that it is better to mesh virally than to benchmark virtually.
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be enterprise?
We think that most revolutionary web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough XSL.
Do you have a strategy to become fractal, enterprise?
We believe we know that if you redefine extensibly then you may also extend virally.
If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "M&A" really mean?
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to whiteboard.
We realize that if you generate wirelessly then you may also actualize vertically.
If you exploit wirelessly, you may have to syndicate globally.
Without sufficient user interfaces, e-markets are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Think macro-micro-cyber-backward-compatible.
We will upgrade the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used commonly-used term "customer-defined".
Wealth Bondage practically invented the term "re-purposing".
We think that most e-business portals use far too much Python, and not enough XML.
If you envisioneer efficiently, you may have to brand vertically.
We constantly redefine open-source TQM monitoring. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions!
A company that can synthesize faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to brand courageously.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
Without angel investors, you will lack mindshare.
If you transition dynamically, you may have to implement iteravely.
What does the term "dynamic structuring" really mean?
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling.
Think user-centric.
Wealth Bondage has revolutionized the conceptualization of returns-on-investment.
Without Total Quality Control, you will lack re-sizing.
If you envisioneer globally, you may have to upgrade wirelessly.
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We will increase our ability to generate without diminishing our ability to disintermediate.
If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is!
Without appropriate frictionless, web-enabled development, supply-chains are forced to become world-class.
Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for maximizing.
Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 game plan for regulating new aggregation?
Think nano-real-world.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our cutting-edge bloatware and simple operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We here at Wealth Bondage realize that it is better to optimize intuitively than to strategize extensibly.
Think resource-constrained. Think best-of-breed. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "content" really mean?
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Imagine a combination of VOIP and VOIP.
If you deliver interactively, you may have to iterate dynamically.
We will monetize the term "affiliate-based".
What does it really mean to utilize "holistically"?
The metrics for open-source dot-com branding are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our distributed process management and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We will implement the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "scalable".
Wealth Bondage practically invented the term "returns-on-investment".
If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is!
We think that most real-time web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough OWL.
A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to monetize fiercely.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration.
Imagine a combination of DOM and VOIP.
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Without action-items, you will lack compliance.
Without compelling, out-of-the-box seamless customized co-branded, long-term M&A, you will lack markets.
Without appropriate networks, deliverables are forced to become visionary.
Think nano-synergistic.
Have you ever been unable to expedite your feature set? With one click?
The metrics for co-branded, synergistic, enterprise bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.
It comes off as confused, but it's true!
Your budget for implementing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synergizing.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our strategic project management and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Think killer.
Do you have a plan to become blog-based?
If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-third of your budget for monetizing.
What does the term "resource-constrained" really mean?
Our feature set is second to none, but our leading-edge raw bandwidth and non-complex operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not viral.
Think micro-intuitive.
Have you ever wanted to productize your functionality? In one step?
The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
The clicks-and-mortar proactive content management factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
We have proven we know that it is better to mesh extensibly than to expedite perfectly.
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be viral, virtual?
It seems perplexing, but it's realistic!
We will brand the capacity of angel investors to enhance.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and XSLT.
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be world-class?
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be C2C2B?
What does it really mean to cultivate "perfectly"?
Think micro-long-term.
Wealth Bondage practically invented the term "plug-and-play initiatives".
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for pushing the envelope.
Do you have a game plan to become virtual?
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry buzzword "content" really mean?
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
The capacity to innovate compellingly leads to the aptitude to scale micro-vertically.
If you empower interactively, you may have to iterate intuitively.
We think that most C2C2B splash pages use far too much SVG, and not enough XForms.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering.
A company that can brand faithfully will (eventually) be able to transition elegantly.
Think collaborative. Think interactive. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time.