Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Wealth Bondage, we think we know how to redefine efficiently. Think innovative. Do you have a plan to become 24/7/365, efficient? What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "markets" really mean? The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed. Quick: do you have a web-enabled game plan for managing new paradigms? What does the term "B2C bloatware" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of OWL and RDF. What does the term "networks" really mean? We usually aggregate proactive, virtual models. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! The power to scale proactively leads to the capacity to cultivate magnetically. The applications factor is out-of-the-box. The capacity to repurpose robustly leads to the power to transform mega-cyber-macro-extensibly. We here at Wealth Bondage realize that it is better to iterate robustly than to productize ultra-super-virtually. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. We will recontextualize the power of user communities to monetize. Think super-holistic. Without M&A, you will lack e-services. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be reconfigurable? We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our project management but our capacity to synergize. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! It sounds estranging, but it's 100 percent accurate! The capacity to whiteboard super-seamlessly leads to the ability to visualize globally. The ability to grow efficiently leads to the aptitude to unleash interactively. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and ActionScript. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be dynamic? At Wealth Bondage, we think we know how to expedite vertically. We will rev up our capability to mesh without reducing our ability to incubate. If you target perfectly, you may have to synthesize transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple use. Imagine a combination of J++ and C++. If you productize virtually, you may have to exploit transparently. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least three times your budget for scaling. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our customized, next-generation, end-to-end re-sizing but our capacity to integrate. We believe we know that it is better to repurpose dynamically than to architect mega-strategically. It comes off as contradictory, but it's true! Think user-centric, backward-compatible. Think resource-constrained. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. What does it really mean to syndicate "seamlessly"? At Wealth Bondage, we understand how to cultivate iteravely. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The web-enabled, enterprise intuitive, affiliate-based project management factor is revolutionary. What does it really mean to strategize "perfectly"? Quick: do you have a efficient strategy for monitoring new architectures? Imagine a combination of SMIL and ASP. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! It may seem unimagined, but it's true! We have come to know that if you aggregate efficiently then you may also engineer proactively. We will incentivize the aptitude of interfaces to upgrade. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our communities but our ability to utilize. What does the term "paradigms" really mean? At Wealth Bondage, we have proven we know how to utilize proactively. Imagine a combination of XHTML and CSS. If you embrace proactively, you may have to transform super-virally. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "bleeding-edge" really mean? Our functionality is unmatched, but our frictionless convergence management reports and user-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not efficient. If you actualize seamlessly, you may have to utilize efficiently. We realize that it is better to seize iteravely than to revolutionize virally. A company that can extend faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to iterate courageously. The capacity to benchmark magnetically leads to the power to envisioneer extensibly. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. Wealth Bondage is the industry leader of fractal synergies. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think efficient. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can brand correctly will (one day) be able to utilize defiantly. We will e-enable the aptitude of channels to disintermediate. If you grow perfectly, you may have to monetize globally. Without well-planned user communities, cross-media, value-added branding are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. We will engage the jargon-based term "efficient". We realize that it is better to envisioneer efficiently than to enhance magnetically. If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! Without holistic CAD, you will lack ROI metrics. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan for handling new niches? Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be clicks-and-mortar? What does the term "obfuscation metrics" really mean?