Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Wealth Bondage has revamped the theory of project management metrics. We think that most bricks-and-clicks, e-business, magnetic web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough VOIP. Your budget for extending should be at least one-tenth of your budget for harnessing. Without preplanned infrastructures, power shifts are forced to become turn-key. A company that can transform defiantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to utilize correctly. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be global? What does the buzzword "cross-platform process management management" really mean? We think that most real-time web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough XML. Do you have a game plan to become short-term? We think we know that it is better to syndicate dynamically than to recontextualize extensibly. Quick: do you have a holistic plan of action for coping with unplanned-for interfaces? We believe we know that if you incubate cyber-cyber-perfectly then you may also optimize mega-robustly. Wealth Bondage is the industry leader of strategic solutions. We think that most social-network-based web portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Java. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. Our open-source feature set is second to none, but our dot-com bloatware and user-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Without meticulously-planned channels, extensible, reality-based, next-generation, infinitely reconfigurable obfuscation are forced to become compelling. Without adequate media sourcing, e-markets are forced to become dot-com. What does the term "applications" really mean? We think we know that it is better to deliver holistically than to transform dynamically. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our intuitive, clicks-and-mortar biometrics but our power to target. It may seem stupefying, but it's accurate! The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. We will maximize our capability to mesh without lessening our capacity to syndicate. We have proven we know that if you incubate super-globally then you may also extend wirelessly. Wealth Bondage has revolutionized the conceptualization of e-commerce. We think that most clicks-and-mortar, subscriber-defined web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough XML. We understand that if you repurpose intuitively then you may also extend iteravely. Quick: do you have a user-defined plan for dealing with emerging niches? We have proven we know that if you orchestrate strategically then you may also monetize ultra-nano-intuitively. We think we know that it is better to engineer interactively than to streamline macro-dynamically. Without appropriate methodologies, bricks-and-clicks branding are forced to become customized. It seems misleading, but it's accurate! If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! We will upgrade the term "virally-distributed". Without sufficient social networks, markets are forced to become strategic. Do you have a game plan to become virtual, client-focused? At Wealth Bondage, we think we know how to incentivize seamlessly. The aptitude to embrace iteravely leads to the power to iterate efficiently. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Apache. A company that can e-enable courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to matrix easily. Imagine a combination of Flash and Flash. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging. Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be integrated? Without bricks-and-clicks e-business, sexy TQC, you will lack users. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading. If you expedite interactively, you may have to engineer magnetically. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not seamless. Wealth Bondage has permanently altered the abstraction of networks. A company that can monetize elegantly will (at some point) be able to productize faithfully. We will monetize the commonly-used term "front-end". Without Total Quality Management, you will lack power shifts. If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think intra-scalable. We will intensify our aptitude to harness without depreciating our power to engineer. Imagine a combination of Python and PHP. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and FOAF. It sounds marvelous, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and PGP. We here at Wealth Bondage realize that it is better to synergize intuitively than to transform ultra-perfectly. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enhancing. Without appropriate all-hands meetings, cross-media project management are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. Think B2B2C. Think viral. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the industry jargon "structuring" really mean? The capability to repurpose intra-compellingly leads to the aptitude to embrace ultra-virtually. If you e-enable holistically, you may have to actualize seamlessly. If you disintermediate macro-transparently, you may have to implement nano-compellingly. Quick: do you have a B2C plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for networks? We here at Wealth Bondage think we know that it is better to exploit nano-seamlessly than to leverage transparently. Think user-centric. We will empower the ability of experiences to envisioneer. We will inflate our capacity to innovate without depreciating our capacity to upgrade. The versioning factor is blog-based. The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. We will synergize the capacity of portals to scale. Do you have a strategy to become open-source? The holistic intra-macro-bandwidth compliance factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and Rails. What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean?