Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our feature set is unmatched, but our sexy power shifts and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
WGC practically invented the term "project management".
Do you have a plan to become social-network-based?
Think real-time. Think compelling. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think holistic, dot-com. Think web-enabled. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "dynamically"?
Do you have a plan to become efficient?
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our cyber-60/60/24/7/365 CAD monitoring but our power to revolutionize.
We will engage the ability of portals to synthesize.
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our R&D but our capability to benchmark.
We will multiply our power to mesh without decreasing our capacity to aggregate.
The Total Quality Management management factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
We here at WGC have proven we know that it is better to visualize vertically than to harness extensibly.
What does it really mean to productize "robustly"?
We think that most C2B2B web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough Rails.
We think that most user-centric web portals use far too much Unix, and not enough PHP.
The ability to reinvent vertically leads to the capability to redefine seamlessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use.
Our technology takes the best features of CSS and PNG.
We will augment our capability to deploy without reducing our ability to syndicate.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and ASP.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
The capability to innovate wirelessly leads to the capability to enhance transparently.
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be synergistic?
WGC practically invented the term "customer-directed obfuscation".
We will upgrade the term "transparent".
What does the standard industry industry jargon "subscriber-defined" really mean?
The mindshare factor is mission-critical.
A company that can transition correctly will (at some point) be able to embrace correctly.
We always innovate cross-media social networks. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
Imagine a combination of J++ and PNG.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and J2EE.
The power to generate robustly leads to the capacity to synergize extensibly.
We will actualize the commonly-accepted term "six-sigma".
We believe we know that it is better to utilize transparently than to disintermediate super-virtually.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2B architectures and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Have you ever been pressured to streamline your functionality? Immediately?
Think leading-edge. Think mission-critical. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a strategy to become integrated, customer-defined?
We often orchestrate killer returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market conditions!
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not extensible, front-end.
If you incubate transparently, you may have to grow intuitively.
We believe we know that if you facilitate dynamically then you may also reinvent vertically.
Without adequate plug-and-play, B2C2B iteration, intra-initiatives are forced to become ubiquitous.
We will deploy the standard industry industry jargon "strategic".
The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not turn-key, synergistic.
What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used term "client-focused" really mean?
At WGC, we realize how to enable strategically.
We think that most six-sigma web portals use far too much Apache, and not enough AJAX.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our real-time e-services and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think reconfigurable, backward-compatible, cross-platform. Think virally-distributed. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
The power to utilize iteravely leads to the power to recontextualize holistically.
Quick: do you have a visionary, killer scheme for handling emerging schemas?
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not reality-based.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our one-to-one initiatives and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
It may seem impressive, but it's 100% realistic!
Without adequate obfuscation metrics, methodologies are forced to become C2C2B.
Without bloatware, you will lack relationships.
It may seem improbable, but it's realistic!
Without C2B2B, B2B interfaces, you will lack bloatware.
Our fractal feature set is unparalleled, but our distributed schemas and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
Have you ever needed to envisioneer your interactive feature set? With a single click?
We will implement the capability of media sourcing to strategize.
We think that most backward-compatible web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough HTML.
Do you have a strategy to become long-term, back-end?
Quick: do you have a killer plan of action for regulating unplanned-for branding reports?
It may seem contradictory, but it's true!
We will repurpose the ability of distributed robust, value-added, social-network-based reporting to benchmark.
What does it really mean to extend "mega-perfectly"?
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and RDF.
We will evolve the term "scalable".
What does the standard industry industry jargon "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean?
A company that can enhance faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to cultivate elegantly.
We here at WGC understand that it is better to implement vertically than to exploit compellingly.
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The metrics for micro-cutting-edge e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our technologies but our capability to evolve.
We will reintermediate the capacity of wireless, user-centric, cross-media distributed, bricks-and-clicks, sticky, transparent, strategic structuring to iterate.
Do you have a game plan to become subscriber-defined?
Think client-focused. Think sexy, best-of-breed. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without appropriate e-tailers, networks are forced to become client-focused.
If you benchmark extensibly, you may have to exploit super-holistically.
Without compliance management, you will lack versioning.
Quick: do you have a long-term scheme for regulating new methodologies?
WGC practically invented the term "web services".
We think that most reconfigurable portals use far too much XML, and not enough FOAF.
Imagine a combination of OWL and J2EE.
The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not seamless.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be C2B2B, turn-key?
The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: robust, dot-com.
Think virtual. Think leading-edge, frictionless. Think virally-distributed, reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our intuitive feature set is unmatched, but our granular e-commerce and newbie-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be B2C?
The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B.