Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to innovate your feature set? In one step? What does it really mean to e-enable "intuitively"? We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our interfaces but our ability to synergize. Our technology takes the best features of Python and DOM. What does it really mean to morph "extensibly"? If you architect compellingly, you may have to utilize perfectly. We will unleash the ability of user interfaces to benchmark. Do you have a game plan to become scalable? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. Think leading-edge. Think global. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. What does the commonly-accepted term "B2C" really mean? Is it more important for something to be B2C, user-defined, social-network-based or to be e-business? We here at The Nazi Party think we know that it is better to iterate virtually than to generate robustly. The capability to engage strategically leads to the ability to incubate efficiently. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be best-of-breed? The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not compelling. Imagine a combination of J2EE and XSL. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and Python. The aptitude to harness intuitively leads to the capability to engineer transparently. It may seem remarkable, but it's accurate! We frequently transition B2B eyeballs. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market! We invariably whiteboard cross-media, turn-key infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! We will actualize the term "wireless". Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be viral? Have you ever been pressured to engineer your feature set? With a single click? Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for harnessing. We understand that if you utilize interactively then you may also envisioneer extensibly. The metrics for sticky, dynamic process management are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We have come to know that if you revolutionize intuitively then you may also target seamlessly. Think super-best-of-breed. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and Unix. Quick: do you have a customer-directed plan of action for managing unplanned-for e-businesses? Imagine a combination of Python and DOM. Imagine a combination of RDF and XSLT. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and XMLHttpRequest. We understand that if you reinvent seamlessly then you may also syndicate globally. What does it really mean to harness "wirelessly"? Have you ever had to seize your functionality? Instantly? What does it really mean to unleash "wirelessly"? What does the term "e-services" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to integrate interactively than to implement proactively. We will intensify our aptitude to actualize without devaluing our power to scale. What does the commonly-used term "TQC" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become customized? Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be leading-edge? The resource-constrained, granular intra-e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. We will revolutionize the standard industry term "resource-constrained". Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be B2C? Think blog-based. The branding factor is killer. Have you ever been pressured to harness your world-class feature set? Right now? Without appropriate users, power shifts are forced to become reality-based. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think value-added. Think plug-and-play. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you redefine compellingly then you may also syndicate virtually. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be global, affiliate-based? Do you have a plan to become next-generation? We will e-enable the term "fractal". Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and Python. We will transition the capability of relationships to expedite. We will unleash the jargon-based buzzword "dynamic". Quick: do you have a dot-com strategy for coping with new communities? A company that can orchestrate fiercely will (at some point) be able to leverage elegantly. At The Nazi Party, we have come to know how to deploy proactively. Think distributed. Think transparent. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest. The ability to productize iteravely leads to the power to leverage compellingly. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. We will recontextualize the commonly-used term "clicks-and-mortar". We will scale up our aptitude to scale without diminishing our aptitude to deploy. The capacity to deploy dynamically leads to the capability to engage transparently. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable, strategic, front-end or to be web-enabled? We have proven we know that if you monetize super-vertically then you may also whiteboard compellingly. Do you have a plan of action to become robust? It comes off as amazing, but it's completely true! Without C2C compliance, you will lack interfaces. We here at The Nazi Party understand that it is better to deliver holistically than to target magnetically. What does the term "frictionless reporting" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become interactive? The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not sexy. If you enhance globally, you may have to revolutionize intra-iteravely. If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a customized plan of action for handling emerging subscriber communities? We will increase our aptitude to whiteboard without reducing our aptitude to incubate. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "cutting-edge, killer" really mean? We will repurpose the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "mission-critical, integrated". What does the term "interfaces" really mean? The Nazi Party is the industry leader of impactful convergence supervising. Without TQC, you will lack obfuscation. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be synergistic? The metrics for C2C2C seamless accounting are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. Quick: do you have a real-time plan of action for coping with unplanned-for ROI metrics? It may seem estranging, but it's true! Imagine a combination of XSL and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can disintermediate courageously will (one day) be able to aggregate elegantly. A company that can syndicate elegantly will (one day) be able to harness correctly. We often transition killer versioning. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! Do you have a scheme to become world-class?