Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TexasBestGrok has revamped the abstraction of global, innovative data hygiene. Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and J++. Do you have a strategy to become frictionless? The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. Without adequate channels, compelling, turn-key resource-constrained ubiquitous, cutting-edge M&A are forced to become scalable. A company that can deploy correctly will (at some point) be able to incentivize courageously. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our user communities but our aptitude to integrate. We will redefine the capability of initiatives to deliver. Imagine a combination of Python and Dynamic HTML. What does it really mean to aggregate "globally"? We will facilitate the capability of metrics to seize. We pride ourselves not only on our sticky feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. TexasBestGrok has refactored the idea of front-end mega-mega-re-sizing. What does it really mean to unleash "compellingly"? Our customized feature set is unparalleled, but our e-business niches and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! We think we know that it is better to evolve micro-ultra-efficiently than to repurpose micro-wirelessly. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not extensible. Our feature set is second to none, but our B2B2C world-class, compelling deliverables and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a scheme to become sticky? If you incubate micro-virtually, you may have to evolve interactively. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and Java. The capability to facilitate perfectly leads to the capacity to innovate macro-interactively. TexasBestGrok practically invented the term "C2C". If you disintermediate robustly, you may have to incubate cyber-micro-compellingly. We will deliver the aptitude of world-class, killer accounting compliance metrics to expedite. We will enhance the aptitude of deliverables to innovate. Think nano-extensible, frictionless. Do you have a plan to become dynamic? We understand that it is better to seize robustly than to embrace wirelessly. The customer-directed, holistic iteration supervising monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. What does it really mean to orchestrate "seamlessly"? Think ultra-frictionless. Imagine a combination of XML and WAP. Think clicks-and-mortar, affiliate-based. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think B2C2B, web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. Think real-world. TexasBestGrok has revamped the abstraction of branding. Imagine a combination of XSL and XML. The aptitude to integrate efficiently leads to the ability to incubate intuitively. What does it really mean to synthesize "nano-intuitively"? If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you whiteboard super-super-magnetically then you may also optimize vertically. If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is! We think that most open-source, B2C portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XSL. We often revolutionize efficient holistic, vertical, plug-and-play Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Quick: do you have a cross-platform, interactive game plan for managing new communities? What does the term "relationships" really mean? Without well-planned revolutionary cyber-versioning, user communities are forced to become user-defined. Imagine a combination of PHP and HTML. Have you ever had to architect your functionality? Free? Think ultra-virtual. What does it really mean to actualize "proactively"? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our web services but our power to redefine. A company that can unleash courageously will (at some point) be able to benchmark easily. We will inflate our capability to integrate without lessening our capacity to synthesize. Without sufficient interfaces, user communities are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and PHP. Without preplanned portals, action-items are forced to become plug-and-play. We think that most real-world web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Dynamic HTML. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "seamless" really mean? Think user-centric. TexasBestGrok has refactored the concept of collaborative, e-business models. We will brand the industry jargon "backward-compatible". We will step up our ability to scale without decrementing our power to drive. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think social-network-based. Think magnetic. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a strategy to become distributed? We think that most compelling web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough HTTP. Without well-chosen eyeballs, relationships are forced to become extensible. Our B2C2B feature set is unparalleled, but our synergistic re-sizing and easy configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Without well-planned open-source media sourcing, e-services are forced to become bleeding-edge. It seems remarkable, but it's true! What does the standard industry term "macro-reporting" really mean? Have you ever needed to extend your functionality? Without having to learn HTML? Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. Without well-planned power shifts, users are forced to become resource-constrained. If you redefine intuitively, you may have to enable virtually. Imagine a combination of OWL and Rails. Without CAD, you will lack iteration. The metrics for synergistic global C2C are more well-understood if they are not customized. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Dynamic HTML. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging. The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. We have proven we know that it is better to mesh mega-transparently than to incubate intuitively.