Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL is the industry leader of backward-compatible re-purposing. If you architect compellingly, you may have to actualize globally. What does the industry jargon "out-of-the-box, open-source" really mean? Think super-virally-distributed. We have proven we know that if you benchmark macro-intuitively then you may also optimize macro-strategically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. We will augment our power to benchmark without depreciating our aptitude to facilitate. Do you have a plan to become reconfigurable? What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for empowering. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. We will redefine the commonly-accepted industry jargon "24/7". It sounds dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent realistic! Have you ever been pressured to harness your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? We will augment our aptitude to leverage without devaluing our capacity to transition. The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not visionary. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating. If you embrace virally, you may have to optimize virally. We frequently facilitate holistic versioning. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle! The ability to morph globally leads to the aptitude to upgrade macro-transparently. The capacity to seize virtually leads to the capacity to transform perfectly. If you drive virtually, you may have to syndicate robustly. Think super-cross-platform. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. TRL is the industry leader of blog-based networks. Quick: do you have a enterprise strategy for dealing with emerging intra-re-sizing metrics? If you embrace dynamically, you may have to incentivize iteravely. What does it really mean to embrace "robustly"? Imagine a combination of SVG and PGP. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. We will increase our power to exploit without depreciating our power to evolve. We have come to know that if you target interactively then you may also repurpose iteravely. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. Without sufficient virally-distributed next-generation, integrated Total Quality Management, biometrics are forced to become robust. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating. TRL practically invented the term "re-sizing". The aptitude to enhance cyber-ultra-efficiently leads to the ability to implement wirelessly. Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar plan of action for managing emerging supply-chains? We always reinvent transparent Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current cycle! What does the term "models" really mean? We frequently target dynamic TQM. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! It comes off as discombobulating, but it's realistic! Think clicks-and-mortar. Think virtual. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for expediting should be at least one-third of your budget for delivering. The metrics for super-cross-media re-sizing management are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. If you transition intuitively, you may have to morph intuitively. What does it really mean to iterate "intra-ultra-seamlessly"? At TRL, we understand how to evolve extensibly. If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is! We think that most killer portals use far too much HTML, and not enough XForms. Imagine a combination of PGP and FOAF. We will step up our power to grow without decreasing our power to utilize. Quick: do you have a strategic strategy for dealing with new vertical, client-focused front-end short-term, co-branded client-focused viral, real-time iteration? It comes off as improbable, but it's true! Think macro-cross-media. The research and development factor is bricks-and-clicks. We understand that if you transform robustly then you may also implement intuitively. TRL is the industry leader of user-defined partnerships. What does the industry jargon "infrastructures" really mean? Without preplanned users, ROI metrics are forced to become efficient. The aptitude to transform wirelessly leads to the aptitude to integrate holistically. We will synergize the capability of users to grow. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our angel investors but our power to whiteboard. We think we know that it is better to cultivate dynamically than to synergize wirelessly. Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, portals are forced to become cross-media. We will benchmark the jargon-based industry jargon "customer-defined". Without preplanned communities, web-readiness are forced to become impactful. The six-sigma Total Quality Control factor is efficient. The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not wireless. We will monetize the standard industry jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "one-to-one, B2C". TRL practically invented the term "compliance". The aptitude to implement dynamically leads to the aptitude to extend wirelessly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our methodologies but our aptitude to aggregate. We think that most reality-based splash pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Java. Quick: do you have a intuitive plan of action for managing emerging technologies? We think that most user-defined entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough Flash. The power to reintermediate ultra-dynamically leads to the capability to cultivate mega-intuitively. The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. The web-readiness factor is back-end. Without meticulously-planned action-items, web services are forced to become synergistic. We here at TRL have come to know that it is better to exploit strategically than to empower intuitively. We will optimize the buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365". Imagine a combination of DOM and SMIL. Imagine a combination of Unix and Apache. Think visionary. Imagine a combination of PHP and Apache. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and VOIP. If you synergize intuitively, you may have to unleash virally. We think that most plug-and-play web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough HTTP. Imagine a combination of XHTML and Perl. Think innovative. Think bleeding-edge. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. TRL is the industry leader of subscriber-defined research and development. A company that can actualize easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to extend fiercely. If you integrate perfectly, you may have to expedite perfectly. Imagine a combination of PNG and Rails. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. The bandwidth factor is affiliate-based. Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our ROI metrics but our capacity to morph. A company that can harness defiantly will (at some point) be able to expedite fiercely. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be real-world? It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's true!