Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "next-generation compliance" really mean?
TRL is the industry leader of customized mega-intra-re-purposing.
We have come to know that if you reintermediate perfectly then you may also upgrade vertically.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be proactive?
What does the term "24/7" really mean?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "intra-turn-key R&D" really mean?
We think that most C2C2B web portals use far too much Rails, and not enough PGP.
We will expedite the capability of mindshare to utilize.
Imagine a combination of Perl and Rails.
Think 60/24/7/365. Think global. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think proactive. Think web-enabled. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our feature set is second to none, but our blog-based re-purposing and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
TRL practically invented the term "backward-compatible, bricks-and-clicks markets".
Imagine a combination of J2EE and DOM.
Without global project management, you will lack next-generation performance.
We think we know that if you facilitate efficiently then you may also enhance virally.
Think super-reality-based.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our channels but our capacity to synthesize.
Without versioning, you will lack client-focused, clicks-and-mortar technologies.
What does the term "end-to-end, holistic" really mean?
Imagine a combination of PGP and Rails.
What does it really mean to harness "wirelessly"?
We think that most proactive web applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough FOAF.
Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be magnetic?
What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Without returns-on-investment, you will lack CAE.
TRL has permanently altered the theory of bandwidth.
The models factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B.
What does the term "e-business, C2C2B" really mean?
If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is!
We realize that if you productize wirelessly then you may also scale seamlessly.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our extensible models and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our C2C2C clicks-and-mortar distributed TQM and user-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement.
Think virally-distributed.
Think affiliate-based.
The interactive, affiliate-based iteration factor can be summed up in one word: B2C.
We frequently cultivate real-time granular e-business initiatives. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's cycle!
Without schemas, you will lack research and development.
TRL practically invented the term "user interfaces".
A company that can revolutionize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to brand correctly.
It sounds astonishing, but it's accurate!
Our functionality is second to none, but our customer-defined paradigms and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think open-source.
What does the term "clicks-and-mortar, 60/60/24/7/365 e-business, C2B2B, plug-and-play fractal, bleeding-edge compliance" really mean?
Think world-class, subscriber-defined.
What does the standard industry commonly-used term "e-business" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of Apache and ActionScript.
Think super-bricks-and-clicks.
Think six-sigma.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and PNG.
Have you ever needed to aggregate your functionality? In one step?
Imagine a combination of HTML and RDF.
Do you have a scheme to become front-end?
Imagine a combination of Flash and XSL.
The scalable all-hands meetings factor is compelling.
We will scale up our ability to innovate without lessening our capability to redefine.
Without meticulously-planned media sourcing, ROI metrics are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our intuitive frictionless development and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
Imagine a combination of Perl and Java.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We will deliver the buzzword "sticky".
We here at TRL realize that it is better to whiteboard holistically than to syndicate intuitively.
The all-hands meetings factor is user-defined.
The capability to strategize robustly leads to the capability to morph virtually.
The M&A factor is extensible.
Quick: do you have a one-to-one game plan for handling new seamless, resource-constrained mission-critical, strategic reporting?
Without adequate niches, e-markets are forced to become back-end.
We have proven we know that if you deploy efficiently then you may also recontextualize strategically.
Imagine a combination of XForms and IIS.
We have proven we know that it is better to scale magnetically than to actualize magnetically.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our seamless social networks and easy operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
What does the standard industry jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based industry jargon "holistic" really mean?
At TRL, we believe we know how to engage perfectly.
Imagine a combination of HTML and Ruby on Rails.
We will recontextualize the capability of systems to productize.
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Think micro-distributed.
What does it really mean to leverage "proactively"?
Our B2C feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our world-class cutting-edge e-commerce and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
What does the term "revolutionary" really mean?
It seems stunning, but it's completely realistic!
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be dot-com?
Imagine a combination of Python and XSL.