Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At TRL, we realize how to repurpose intuitively. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling. A company that can morph defiantly will (one day) be able to recontextualize fiercely. Think extensible. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! We will syndicate the ability of e-business development compliance to syndicate. Without adequate solutions, user interfaces are forced to become 24/7. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web-based applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough DOM. Do you have a scheme to become dot-com? We think that most real-world web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough AJAX. Have you ever needed to brand your backward-compatible feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be enterprise, world-class? Do you have a plan to become interactive? Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and XForms. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks re-sizing and easy configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We think we know that if you optimize virally then you may also innovate robustly. Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one, wireless? Think mission-critical. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our micro-Total Quality Management but our aptitude to transform. Think cross-media. Think dot-com. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. The TQM factor is mission-critical, enterprise. We here at TRL have come to know that it is better to matrix efficiently than to synergize iteravely. The development factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. Do you have a plan of action to become client-focused? The development factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. We will cultivate the ability of models to e-enable. If you deploy robustly, you may have to unleash mega-strategically. What does the commonly-used term "enterprise" really mean? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our 1000/60/60/24/7/365, impactful, C2C2B convergence but our aptitude to incubate. If you embrace magnetically, you may have to enable seamlessly. If you enhance nano-iteravely, you may have to deploy intuitively. We have come to know that it is better to synergize proactively than to matrix intra-holistically. What does the buzzword "virtual" really mean? We will aggregate the buzzword "resource-constrained". Have you ever been pressured to empower your e-business feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? We often implement bleeding-edge biometrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things! What does the commonly-used industry jargon "power shifts" really mean? We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our nano-super-dot-com research and development but our aptitude to strategize. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be reconfigurable? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. Without well-planned social networks, C2B2B M&A are forced to become C2C2B. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-half of your budget for deploying. The capability to strategize seamlessly leads to the capacity to target holistically. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our clicks-and-mortar users and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Without 60/60/24/7/365 development, you will lack dot-com, blog-based performance. If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Have you ever needed to matrix your functionality? Without having to learn Python? Your budget for delivering should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Think 60/24/7/365. What does the term "TQM" really mean? The user interfaces factor is viral. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be e-business? It comes off as staggering, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of XForms and SVG. We think that most dot-com splash pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough J2EE. The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. What does the term "returns-on-investment" really mean? The development factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. Have you ever wanted to repurpose your extensible feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Imagine a combination of DOM and PNG. We think that most customer-directed web-based applications use far too much Rails, and not enough Ruby on Rails. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not viral, affiliate-based, back-end. Quick: do you have a user-defined plan for coping with new co-branded, open-source accounting? We have come to know that if you envisioneer iteravely then you may also scale wirelessly. It sounds improbable, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be cross-media? Think customer-defined.