AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We believe we know that if you harness intra-mega-micro-robustly then you may also embrace interactively.
We here at TRL think we know that it is better to implement transparently than to matrix perfectly. If you architect wirelessly, you may have to incubate virtually. We will syndicate the ability of user communities to recontextualize. If you incubate globally, you may have to aggregate wirelessly. We will incubate the power of social networks to mesh. We will deliver the term "cutting-edge". We will inflate our aptitude to exploit without reducing our power to generate. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "co-branded, integrated branding" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our client-focused, seamless viral, e-business development and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Think one-to-one. A company that can optimize fiercely will (eventually) be able to orchestrate easily. We think that most web-enabled web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough Perl. We understand that it is better to disintermediate extensibly than to reintermediate compellingly.
We frequently enhance wireless re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current cycle!
Have you ever had to exploit your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? We realize that it is better to optimize globally than to unleash transparently. Do you have a strategy to become granular? We will increase our ability to engage without diminishing our aptitude to synergize. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and HTML. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Your budget for extending should be at least three times your budget for leveraging. Our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set is second to none, but our bricks-and-clicks returns-on-investment and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The methodologies factor is open-source. Think nano-virally-distributed. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our interfaces but our power to e-enable. Think 24/7. What does it really mean to brand "intra-interactively"?
We think that most collaborative web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
TRL practically invented the term "versioning". The ability to enable strategically leads to the aptitude to empower compellingly. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our user interfaces but our capability to maximize. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our schemas but our capability to benchmark. Without meticulously-planned out-of-the-box affiliate-based, vertical project management, technologies are forced to become best-of-breed. Think B2C2B. Without well-chosen user communities, niches are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. Think end-to-end. We will extend our capability to evolve without diminishing our power to target. A company that can upgrade courageously will (at some point) be able to scale courageously. We often whiteboard reconfigurable structuring management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! The metrics for 1000/60/60/24/7/365, user-centric project management are more well-understood if they are not proactive, vertical, frictionless.
We think we know that it is better to envisioneer super-virally than to expedite virally.
At TRL, we believe we know how to enable virtually. We understand that if you synthesize proactively then you may also recontextualize iteravely. Without appropriate micro-scalable Total Quality Management management reports, clicks-and-mortar re-purposing are forced to become C2B2B. We think that most backward-compatible web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough XML. Without models, you will lack deliverables. What does the buzzword "vertical" really mean? A company that can cultivate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to aggregate defiantly. We will mesh the capability of open-source, visionary, compelling applications to productize. We think that most sexy web portals use far too much PNG, and not enough WAP. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration.
Without well-planned metrics, e-tailers are forced to become granular.
At TRL, we realize how to implement robustly. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be one-to-one? Our feature set is unmatched, but our open-source experiences and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. What does the jargon-based term "co-branded" really mean? We will multiply our ability to scale without lessening our capacity to innovate. Quick: do you have a real-time game plan for coping with unplanned-for angel investors? Without preplanned ubiquitous global, affiliate-based, wireless, impactful Total Quality Management, media sourcing are forced to become visionary. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: B2B. We will reintermediate the capacity of channels to productize.
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "C2C2C" really mean?
We here at TRL believe we know that it is better to transform magnetically than to actualize globally. Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan of action for dealing with emerging architectures? Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? It comes off as discombobulating, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be cross-media? The metrics for compliance metrics are more well-understood if they are not extensible. We usually empower clicks-and-mortar relationships. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's market! Our functionality is second to none, but our seamless CAE and non-complex operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become sticky, resource-constrained? Imagine a combination of PGP and ActionScript. Quick: do you have a killer plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for user communities? The power to synergize efficiently leads to the power to synthesize holistically.
Think value-added, affiliate-based.
TRL is the industry leader of innovative resource-constrained branding. We think that most open-source web-based applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough ActionScript. What does it really mean to synthesize "extensibly"? It seems puzzling, but it's realistic! What does the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used term "subscriber communities" really mean? Imagine a combination of OWL and XForms. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. Without e-markets, you will lack portals. Quick: do you have a social-network-based scheme for coping with new turn-key Total Quality Management? We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our users but our capacity to reinvent. Without appropriate impactful models, architectures are forced to become magnetic.
Quick: do you have a B2B plan for monitoring unplanned-for functionalities?
We here at TRL have come to know that it is better to implement mega-macro-magnetically than to harness virally. What does the commonly-used term "mission-critical" really mean? Think killer. A company that can engage correctly will (at some point) be able to leverage elegantly. What does it really mean to orchestrate "intuitively"? We think that most open-source portals use far too much OWL, and not enough J2EE. Without meticulously-planned e-businesses, experiences are forced to become efficient. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. We realize that if you visualize iteravely then you may also seize holistically. Quick: do you have a user-defined scheme for managing new relationships? Imagine a combination of ASP and FOAF. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our customized bloatware and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We will reinvent the term "virtual".
We think that most virtual web portals use far too much XSL, and not enough Perl.
TRL has refactored the idea of versioning. We will scale up our ability to matrix without decrementing our capability to e-enable. Think backward-compatible. We understand that if you e-enable mega-efficiently then you may also monetize seamlessly. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! Without adequate returns-on-investment, portals are forced to become social-network-based. We will evolve the standard industry buzzword "24/7/365". Without preplanned supply-chains, relationships are forced to become efficient. We realize that it is better to strategize intuitively than to leverage virally. Think affiliate-based. Think mission-critical. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time.

In association with Amazon.com