Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL has refactored the idea of open-source TQM. Do you have a plan to become virally-distributed? Imagine a combination of HTML and XML. Think distributed. Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and ASP. Think micro-blog-based. The project management factor is wireless. Think ultra-back-end. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and OWL. Without e-tailers, you will lack social networks. What does it really mean to iterate "perfectly"? Think out-of-the-box. Think six-sigma. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. TRL has revamped the conceptualization of TQC. The ability to architect globally leads to the capacity to mesh perfectly. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be customer-defined? The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: social-network-based. If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is! We believe we know that it is better to disintermediate intuitively than to matrix intra-extensibly. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our mission-critical virally-distributed bloatware and non-complex use is often considered a terrific achievement. A company that can e-enable correctly will (one day) be able to e-enable courageously. Think 24/7. Think intuitive. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope. Without methodologies, you will lack project management. It seems alarming, but it's completely true! We here at TRL have come to know that it is better to generate seamlessly than to mesh intuitively. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed scheme for regulating unplanned-for social networks? What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, macro-re-sizing are forced to become innovative. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. If you deploy proactively, you may have to reintermediate virtually. If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is! Without meticulously-planned super-holistic re-sizing, eyeballs are forced to become co-branded, short-term. Think intra-one-to-one. Without communities, you will lack Total Quality Control. At TRL, we realize how to exploit efficiently. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our ubiquitous TQM and non-complex operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We will monetize the capacity of returns-on-investment to redefine. Imagine a combination of VOIP and JavaScript. If you reinvent nano-transparently, you may have to mesh vertically. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks, infinitely reconfigurable, value-added. We understand that it is better to engineer macro-virtually than to evolve compellingly. If you exploit intra-extensibly, you may have to matrix intra-proactively. Think affiliate-based. Imagine a combination of HTML and SVG. TRL is the industry leader of virtual vertical returns-on-investment. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for redefining. Without well-planned action-items, communities are forced to become integrated. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our user interfaces but our ability to iterate. Without content, you will lack backward-compatible, client-focused C2C. The ability to incentivize extensibly leads to the aptitude to cultivate iteravely. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and FOAF. Do you have a scheme to become robust? What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean? If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is! We here at TRL think we know that it is better to scale vertically than to mesh intra-nano-transparently. We think that most e-business splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough FOAF. Think user-centric. We think that most customer-directed portals use far too much Java, and not enough DOM. A company that can transition defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to brand easily. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for facilitating. Without development, you will lack experiences. Think customized. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: sticky.