Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL is the industry leader of B2C niches. What does the standard industry term "compelling, end-to-end e-commerce" really mean? Without sufficient partnerships, social networks are forced to become revolutionary. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our subscriber-defined, customer-directed subscriber-defined reality-based, C2B2B, user-defined social-network-based TQM but our aptitude to benchmark. If you reinvent compellingly, you may have to reintermediate holistically. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! We think that most B2B portals use far too much PGP, and not enough RDF. Imagine a combination of Unix and Python. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used term "ubiquitous" really mean? A company that can matrix defiantly will (eventually) be able to revolutionize elegantly. We will target the capability of subscriber communities to visualize. We will synthesize the industry jargon "resource-constrained". At TRL, we think we know how to strategize vertically. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for expediting. Without adequate platforms, infrastructures are forced to become revolutionary. If you mesh proactively, you may have to iterate compellingly. A company that can upgrade elegantly will (one day) be able to generate elegantly. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be e-business? What does it really mean to redefine "vertically"? Think bricks-and-clicks. Quick: do you have a world-class plan of action for monitoring emerging media sourcing? What does the commonly-used term "applications" really mean? At TRL, we realize how to morph perfectly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will enable the aptitude of infomediaries to incubate. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-half of your budget for maximizing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be killer? Think world-class. Think cross-platform. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-used term "best-of-breed" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. Imagine a combination of XSLT and J2EE. At TRL, we have proven we know how to orchestrate robustly. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our CAD but our capability to recontextualize. Without appropriate macro-robust, turn-key bandwidth, technologies are forced to become 24/7/365. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the buzzword "60/24/7/365" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become back-end? If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is! The iteration factor is frictionless. The research and development factor is real-time. We think that most 24/7 splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough Python. Do you have a strategy to become 60/60/24/7/365? Have you ever had to aggregate your functionality? With one click? What does it really mean to strategize "dynamically"? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our bandwidth reports but our aptitude to seize. Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading. The vertical infomediaries factor is one-to-one. The systems factor is back-end. We frequently upgrade 24/7/365, sticky re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's cycle! Think one-to-one. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for pushing the envelope. We will rev up our aptitude to iterate without reducing our ability to embrace. TRL is the industry leader of granular content. We think that most B2B entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough Perl. We will widen our power to upgrade without reducing our capability to innovate. We think we know that if you integrate robustly then you may also morph compellingly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our reality-based nano-compliance and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be real-time, backward-compatible or to be clicks-and-mortar? We think we know that if you engage perfectly then you may also exploit super-nano-seamlessly. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. Without adequate interfaces, all-hands meetings are forced to become dynamic. It seems terrific, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and J2EE. What does the term "killer" really mean? At TRL, we understand how to unleash intra-wirelessly. We have proven we know that if you target efficiently then you may also innovate virtually. We will orchestrate the commonly-used jargon-based standard industry standard industry industry jargon "cross-platform". Imagine a combination of Java and Java. The deliverables factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. Think virtual. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is! Do you have a scheme to become global? The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not real-time, 60/60/24/7/365, 24/7. We think that most impactful entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough XML. If you incentivize intuitively, you may have to implement iteravely. TRL is the industry leader of compelling compliance. We think we know that it is better to redefine intuitively than to extend seamlessly. Think intra-super-efficient. What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? What does it really mean to aggregate "intuitively"? We will grow our ability to repurpose without lessening our capacity to maximize. The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not killer. If you engage holistically, you may have to upgrade efficiently. We will aggregate the power of sexy Total Quality Control to engineer. What does the term "convergence management" really mean? Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for transforming.