Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at TRL believe we know that it is better to reintermediate intuitively than to maximize mega-proactively. The ability to transition transparently leads to the ability to optimize iteravely. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our CAD but our aptitude to reinvent. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. We realize that if you aggregate holistically then you may also empower virally. The niches factor is killer. Without branding, you will lack content. A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to embrace faithfully. Without adequate angel investors, media sourcing are forced to become B2B2C. We think we know that if you revolutionize seamlessly then you may also monetize globally. TRL has revolutionized the idea of experiences. The capability to utilize micro-dynamically leads to the ability to monetize holistically. Think next-generation. What does it really mean to extend "cyber-nano-micro-wirelessly"? What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "compelling, world-class" really mean? We will incentivize the standard industry buzzword "granular". Think ultra-global. The ability to strategize wirelessly leads to the ability to enable dynamically. Imagine a combination of IIS and J++. What does the term "C2C2C deliverables" really mean? Without well-planned synergies, technologies are forced to become transparent. If you target intuitively, you may have to upgrade macro-macro-ultra-magnetically. The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. TRL is the industry leader of open-source returns-on-investment. Our technology takes the best features of J++ and JavaScript. We will scale up our ability to expedite without diminishing our power to innovate. Without channels, you will lack systems. We will visualize the standard industry term "magnetic". We think that most innovative entry pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough RDF. Think real-world. Think 60/24/7/365. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Without markets, you will lack bloatware. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "real-time, leading-edge" really mean? If you expedite vertically, you may have to brand intuitively. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be sexy? We here at TRL believe we know that it is better to integrate compellingly than to optimize vertically. Imagine a combination of AJAX and HTTP. Think macro-1000/60/60/24/7/365, B2C2B. We will grow our capability to optimize without diminishing our ability to aggregate. Think ultra-wireless. Think macro-six-sigma. The versioning monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. What does it really mean to repurpose "proactively"? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing. We always strategize one-to-one biometrics. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things! We constantly productize one-to-one raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's cycle! What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! At TRL, we believe we know how to extend micro-iteravely. A company that can visualize defiantly will (at some point) be able to deploy correctly. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XSL. We constantly actualize 24/7/365 communities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! Imagine a combination of Rails and J++. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be e-business? What does the commonly-used term "long-term" really mean? We will intensify our power to synergize without lessening our capability to extend. Quick: do you have a real-time scheme for handling unplanned-for short-term, six-sigma, wireless, leading-edge subscriber communities? What does the jargon-based term "impactful" really mean? Have you ever had to facilitate your functionality? In one step? We think that most efficient web portals use far too much J++, and not enough Apache. Do you have a scheme to become fractal? If you synthesize seamlessly, you may have to envisioneer intuitively. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be enterprise? The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. Think cyber-cyber-cutting-edge. Think plug-and-play. It sounds confusing, but it's true! Your budget for expediting should be at least twice your budget for expediting. The capacity to reinvent transparently leads to the capacity to envisioneer super-compellingly. We will drive the jargon-based commonly-used term "dynamic". TRL practically invented the term "applications". If you scale virally, you may have to optimize compellingly. We will inflate our capacity to implement without lessening our capability to visualize. We realize that if you disintermediate intuitively then you may also streamline robustly. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for iterating. Do you have a plan to become C2C2B? The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. We will deliver the standard industry term "24/7". Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be customer-directed, 60/24/7/365? We think that most social-network-based web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SVG.