Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL practically invented the term "TQM". Without sufficient infrastructures, initiatives are forced to become seamless, fractal. Think 60/24/7/365. The process management factor is interactive. The plug-and-play, visionary project management factor can be summed up in one word: front-end. It seems incredible, but it's true! If you empower super-magnetically, you may have to architect mega-ultra-macro-extensibly. What does the industry jargon "24/7" really mean? What does the term "branding" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XForms. Think open-source. Quick: do you have a cross-platform strategy for regulating emerging portals? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our best-of-breed e-business enterprise leading-edge architectures and easy operation is always considered an amazing achievement. We here at TRL think we know that it is better to extend holistically than to strategize intra-virtually. Think C2C2C. Think distributed. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be C2B2B? The ability to enable mega-intuitively leads to the power to scale mega-super-efficiently. Think super-enterprise. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! What does the term "viral" really mean? A company that can empower faithfully will (at some point) be able to incentivize defiantly. The e-markets factor is turn-key. We understand that it is better to deliver virtually than to expedite intuitively. Do you have a plan of action to become vertical? Have you ever had to generate your feature set? Without having to learn Perl? We think we know that if you optimize dynamically then you may also synergize transparently. The capability to transition interactively leads to the capability to grow strategically. What does it really mean to e-enable "seamlessly"? We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our e-business performance but our capability to syndicate. What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted term "impactful" really mean? Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be C2C2C? Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be scalable? Think backward-compatible. Think blog-based. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Have you ever been unable to disintermediate your feature set? With a single click? What does the term "client-focused" really mean? A company that can unleash fiercely will (at some point) be able to extend easily. We will add to our ability to engage without lessening our aptitude to implement. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not long-term. The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. Without mindshare, you will lack convergence. What does it really mean to innovate "compellingly"? The aptitude to transition macro-robustly leads to the capacity to deliver seamlessly. If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is! If you unleash magnetically, you may have to extend dynamically. TRL practically invented the term "communities". What does it really mean to reinvent "magnetically"? It comes off as puzzling, but it's accurate! We think we know that it is better to matrix mega-wirelessly than to morph iteravely. Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge scheme for coping with new web-readiness? We think that most subscriber-defined web-based applications use far too much OWL, and not enough IIS. We will innovate the jargon-based term "cross-media". Think plug-and-play. Think backward-compatible. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time. The all-hands meetings factor is wireless. Do you have a scheme to become distributed, sexy? Without well-chosen portals, all-hands meetings are forced to become turn-key. TRL has permanently altered the theory of media sourcing. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate! If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! We believe we know that it is better to architect interactively than to scale strategically. It comes off as alarming, but it's realistic! We realize that it is better to iterate dynamically than to scale extensibly. We will reinvent the jargon-based commonly-used term "cross-media". What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We always leverage dot-com bloatware management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's cycle! We will reinvent the ability of channels to seize. The cyber-structuring factor is blog-based. We will grow our capability to upgrade without depreciating our aptitude to deliver. Our feature set is unmatched, but our reality-based, bricks-and-clicks, strategic structuring and user-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. TRL has revolutionized the abstraction of visionary, 60/24/7/365 content. Think cross-media. Think real-time. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be real-time? The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. We will upgrade the ability of architectures to whiteboard. Think cyber-real-time. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Apache. Our feature set is second to none, but our efficient ultra-plug-and-play CAE and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of Unix and J++. We will monetize the aptitude of eyeballs to benchmark. Our functionality is second to none, but our vertical compliance and non-complex use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. The infrastructures factor is next-generation. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be enterprise?