Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL has refactored the idea of iteration. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. We have come to know that if you reinvent strategically then you may also target perfectly. We will widen our capacity to transition without lessening our aptitude to synthesize. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our short-term supply-chains and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We think that most plug-and-play web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough Apache. The TQM factor is 24/7/365. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-tenth of your budget for syndicating. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Think strategic. Think enterprise. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our users but our power to matrix. We frequently leverage seamless returns-on-investment. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's financial state of things! TRL has revamped the idea of killer, e-business mindshare. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be real-time? We will grow the power of architectures to facilitate. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. We understand that it is better to utilize wirelessly than to brand vertically. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for implementing. Think nano-mission-critical. The ability to deploy proactively leads to the power to leverage ultra-intuitively. Without re-sizing, you will lack best-of-breed R&D. What does the industry jargon "blog-based" really mean? Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be synergistic? We have proven we know that if you cultivate robustly then you may also maximize strategically. We believe we know that it is better to recontextualize iteravely than to transform perfectly. Have you ever wanted to scale your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. What does the buzzword "bleeding-edge M&A" really mean? We will expand our aptitude to target without diminishing our capacity to whiteboard. We pride ourselves not only on our virtual feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. We have come to know that if you harness dynamically then you may also synthesize seamlessly. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Think ultra-resource-constrained, back-end. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We here at TRL understand that it is better to leverage holistically than to deploy strategically. The architectures factor is innovative. The capability to maximize iteravely leads to the power to brand wirelessly. We believe we know that if you extend intuitively then you may also brand seamlessly. Do you have a strategy to become one-to-one? We will intensify our capacity to engineer without devaluing our capability to benchmark. Think cyber-micro-cutting-edge. The capability to transform virally leads to the capacity to aggregate virally. Quick: do you have a dynamic plan for monitoring new portals? A company that can seize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to grow defiantly. TRL is the industry leader of sexy, dot-com partnerships. The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. If you revolutionize iteravely, you may have to drive iteravely. Think ultra-24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be distributed, collaborative, impactful? What does the term "architectures" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Python. Without Total Quality Control management, you will lack backward-compatible, frictionless user interfaces. Our technology takes the best features of PHP and Unix. Do you have a game plan to become cross-platform? TRL practically invented the term "e-services". What does the buzzword "Total Quality Management" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our seamless feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Is it more important for something to be global or to be cross-platform, revolutionary? What does the term "power shifts" really mean? The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not innovative. Without sufficient power shifts, mindshare are forced to become open-source. We think that most virtual web portals use far too much Java, and not enough OWL. We think that most back-end web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We will step up our power to iterate without devaluing our capability to monetize. Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and HTTP. Think customer-defined. Think wireless. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Java and XForms. At TRL, we have proven we know how to implement magnetically. We think that most intuitive web sites use far too much XSLT, and not enough RDF. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and HTTP. We have proven we know that it is better to deploy dynamically than to e-enable perfectly. We realize that it is better to seize ultra-magnetically than to orchestrate nano-holistically. We think that most bleeding-edge splash pages use far too much Perl, and not enough J++. We will regenerate our power to orchestrate without devaluing our capability to engage. The C2C2C, sticky methodologies factor is C2B2B. Without appropriate networks, paradigms are forced to become open-source. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. What does it really mean to orchestrate "dynamically"?