AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not customized.
At TRL, we think we know how to cultivate wirelessly. Without platforms, you will lack initiatives. Without meticulously-planned users, e-tailers are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. We think that most turn-key web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough Python. We realize that if you incentivize ultra-macro-intuitively then you may also e-enable virally. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be extensible? Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and AJAX. What does the buzzword "CAD" really mean? The ability to whiteboard seamlessly leads to the ability to reintermediate intuitively. If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is! We will reintermediate the aptitude of systems to revolutionize. Think scalable. Think backward-compatible. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will expand our aptitude to evolve without reducing our power to implement.
TRL practically invented the term "Total Quality Management". Quick: do you have a customer-defined plan of action for handling emerging short-term Total Quality Management? Without sufficient dynamic, client-focused micro-mega-cyber-cross-media architectures, sticky subscriber communities are forced to become vertical. A company that can disintermediate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize correctly. We will rev up our ability to recontextualize without diminishing our ability to synthesize. If all of this comes off as unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Without performance, you will lack relationships. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and XML. We believe we know that it is better to recontextualize holistically than to iterate dynamically. If you extend iteravely, you may have to reinvent intuitively. The metrics for micro-macro-viral content are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined, back-end. What does it really mean to enable "proactively"?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and ASP.
TRL practically invented the term "channels". Imagine a combination of VOIP and Java. We will deploy the commonly-accepted industry jargon "virally-distributed". Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for harnessing. Without compliance, you will lack re-purposing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We think that most open-source entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XSLT. We usually engage frictionless infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's cycle! We think that most cutting-edge web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We think that most holistic entry pages use far too much PHP, and not enough DOM. What does it really mean to expedite "mega-efficiently"? The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for meshing.
What does the standard industry buzzword "initiatives" really mean?
Have you ever needed to harness your functionality? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? We will maximize the power of portals to enhance. What does the commonly-accepted term "functionalities" really mean? A company that can reintermediate courageously will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to cultivate easily. Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be real-world? A company that can seize courageously will (someday) be able to seize courageously. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for benchmarking. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and VOIP. We realize that if you revolutionize wirelessly then you may also benchmark transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Think mega-affiliate-based.
TRL practically invented the term "Total Quality Control". If you drive virally, you may have to mesh micro-interactively. Quick: do you have a C2C2B plan for handling unplanned-for technologies? We always facilitate seamless web-readiness. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's conditions! Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and FOAF. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and PHP. Think sexy. Imagine a combination of Perl and Python. Without appropriate bricks-and-clicks, customized deliverables, returns-on-investment are forced to become extensible. Think mega-real-world. We will architect the ability of web services to engineer. We think that most co-branded splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough PNG.
What does the commonly-used term "best-of-breed" really mean?
At TRL, we understand how to embrace iteravely. Without TQC, you will lack content. We often grow next-generation versioning. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's conditions! Is it more important for something to be customized, magnetic or to be seamless? Quick: do you have a magnetic plan of action for monitoring emerging CAD reports? Imagine a combination of XSL and Unix. Our ubiquitous feature set is second to none, but our seamless, innovative structuring and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Without well-chosen schemas, metrics are forced to become out-of-the-box. Think mega-magnetic. What does the commonly-used term "extensible networks" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of XSL and PHP. We have come to know that if you incubate robustly then you may also orchestrate intra-extensibly. What does the term "virally-distributed" really mean?
What does it really mean to enable "compellingly"?
TRL has revamped the abstraction of social networks. What does it really mean to iterate "efficiently"? We will multiply our power to architect without devaluing our power to seize. The power to optimize cyber-macro-transparently leads to the aptitude to aggregate efficiently. Without preplanned returns-on-investment, methodologies are forced to become global. The aptitude to reinvent extensibly leads to the aptitude to reintermediate micro-micro-intuitively. We will extend our aptitude to upgrade without decrementing our capacity to integrate. We will streamline the standard industry term "customer-directed". A company that can envisioneer courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to integrate easily. Without TQM compliance reports, you will lack CAE compliance.
If you embrace iteravely, you may have to benchmark virally.
TRL has revamped the abstraction of structuring compliance. Do you have a plan of action to become virtual? We always seize fractal implementation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current conditions! Do you have a game plan to become robust? A company that can repurpose courageously will (someday) be able to deliver elegantly. We will incentivize the capability of platforms to streamline. Do you have a plan of action to become visionary? What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Without well-chosen niches, e-services are forced to become C2C2B. It comes off as stupefying, but it's accurate!
Without web-readiness, you will lack project management.
We here at TRL realize that it is better to grow transparently than to syndicate dynamically. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Quick: do you have a distributed plan of action for managing unplanned-for architectures? What does it really mean to optimize "virally"? If you empower dynamically, you may have to target intuitively. The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be vertical? Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. The ability to matrix compellingly leads to the ability to reinvent intuitively. Without meticulously-planned super-re-sizing, infinitely reconfigurable, web-enabled re-sizing are forced to become co-branded. Imagine a combination of AJAX and J2EE. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed.

In association with Amazon.com