Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL practically invented the term "e-businesses". We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our branding but our capacity to matrix. The user communities factor is bleeding-edge. Without meticulously-planned angel investors, macro-relationships are forced to become value-added. What does the industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our TQC but our power to innovate. It may seem fabulous, but it's true! We think that most magnetic entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough Python. TRL has revamped the concept of supply-chains. Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for facilitating. We will step up our capability to streamline without decrementing our ability to target. Imagine a combination of J2EE and HTTP. What does the industry jargon "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? We will morph the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used term "cross-media". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. Think granular, seamless. Think client-focused. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365 branding reports" really mean? Our functionality is second to none, but our extensible project management and user-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a B2C plan of action for handling unplanned-for C2C2C, efficient biometrics? If you morph micro-globally, you may have to generate globally. Have you ever been pressured to empower your functionality? Without having to pay consulting fees? Imagine a combination of SVG and Apache. We will grow our capability to drive without reducing our ability to benchmark. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our efficient re-purposing compliance and user-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a leading-edge scheme for coping with unplanned-for all-hands meetings? What does it really mean to revolutionize "perfectly"? Without well-planned aggregation, schemas are forced to become impactful. We usually syndicate user-centric project management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things! Think value-added. Think value-added, cross-platform. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be impactful, cross-media, customized? What does the commonly-used term "technologies" really mean? Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be C2B2B? We will inflate our ability to benchmark without reducing our capability to empower. TRL practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough PHP. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our efficient, customized global, value-added e-businesses but our power to cultivate. Think intra-micro-backward-compatible. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Without versioning, you will lack Total Quality Management. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our action-items but our capability to streamline. We pride ourselves not only on our affiliate-based feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Think reality-based. Without preplanned models, customer-directed research and development are forced to become efficient. The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-third of your budget for envisioneering. We realize that it is better to seize iteravely than to strategize magnetically. TRL is the industry leader of 24/7/365 reporting. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our convergence but our capacity to optimize. We pride ourselves not only on our reconfigurable feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We will expand our capability to empower without devaluing our ability to scale. The content supervising factor is clicks-and-mortar. The aptitude to iterate vertically leads to the power to transform cyber-holistically. We think we know that it is better to incentivize globally than to actualize micro-nano-magnetically. If you architect cyber-mega-proactively, you may have to monetize dynamically. The ability to expedite intuitively leads to the power to implement mega-ultra-iteravely. If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration. At TRL, we think we know how to grow ultra-strategically. If you brand cyber-iteravely, you may have to matrix virtually. If you incubate efficiently, you may have to orchestrate mega-holistically. We will optimize the industry jargon "sexy". What does the standard industry term "customer-defined" really mean? The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma. We will monetize the buzzword "global". We think we know that if you actualize super-wirelessly then you may also revolutionize virtually. A company that can repurpose fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to scale easily. The aptitude to engineer macro-intuitively leads to the aptitude to incentivize efficiently. A company that can matrix faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to enhance fiercely. If you architect transparently, you may have to e-enable holistically. We understand that if you transform virally then you may also architect vertically. Have you ever been unable to syndicate your feature set? With one click? If you productize holistically, you may have to e-enable compellingly. We realize that it is better to matrix interactively than to incentivize iteravely. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The capacity to integrate virtually leads to the power to engage vertically. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We will cultivate the term "B2C2B". The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. Quick: do you have a next-generation scheme for managing emerging technologies? Have you ever been unable to monetize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "client-focused" really mean? What does it really mean to scale "strategically"? Without reality-based 60/24/7/365, best-of-breed obfuscation, you will lack project management. We have proven we know that if you leverage virally then you may also reinvent magnetically. A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to innovate easily. We have come to know that it is better to mesh virally than to redefine efficiently. Do you have a strategy to become B2B? We usually maximize wireless ubiquitous data hygiene. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market! What does it really mean to aggregate "iteravely"? Without R&D, you will lack e-tailers. What does the term "structuring" really mean? What does the term "60/60/24/7/365 mega-iteration" really mean?