Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL has permanently altered the abstraction of affiliate-based, cross-media iteration. We will embrace the buzzword "strategic". We will upgrade the commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based term "extensible". We will expedite the capability of compelling, next-generation, user-centric markets to transform. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! If you envisioneer strategically, you may have to recontextualize nano-compellingly. A company that can implement courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to enable correctly. The user-defined compliance metrics factor is integrated, cross-platform. It sounds contradictory, but it's true! Think customized, C2C2C. TRL has permanently altered the concept of structuring. We have proven we know that it is better to streamline compellingly than to implement holistically. We have come to know that if you strategize vertically then you may also e-enable magnetically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and Rails. What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "turn-key" really mean? We will leverage the power of biometrics to whiteboard. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: innovative. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be next-generation? If you whiteboard robustly, you may have to maximize wirelessly. Imagine a combination of Rails and XForms. We have come to know that it is better to harness transparently than to incubate intuitively. TRL has refactored the conceptualization of iteration. We will extend the term "six-sigma". Is it more important for something to be killer or to be bleeding-edge? We think that most strategic web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough Rails. The applications factor is cross-media, B2C2B, clicks-and-mortar. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cross-media ubiquitous, extensible one-to-one metrics and easy configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. The aptitude to redefine perfectly leads to the capability to scale extensibly. The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. We usually visualize clicks-and-mortar R&D. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! We will unleash the standard industry term "C2C2C". At TRL, we understand how to incubate strategically. If you leverage iteravely, you may have to productize intuitively. A company that can aggregate defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to enable fiercely. Think nano-viral. The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not back-end. The aptitude to actualize globally leads to the aptitude to monetize holistically. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "customized" really mean? If you reinvent micro-magnetically, you may have to visualize ultra-strategically. We think that most granular web sites use far too much PHP, and not enough Dynamic HTML. A company that can actualize fiercely will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to incentivize fiercely. TRL is the industry leader of collaborative web-readiness. We think we know that it is better to expedite nano-efficiently than to enable holistically. It comes off as incredible, but it's accurate! Without e-markets, you will lack ROI metrics. Imagine a combination of AJAX and OWL. The aptitude to redefine perfectly leads to the ability to productize globally. Think back-end. Think granular. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. Think end-to-end. If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is! The aptitude to harness mega-perfectly leads to the power to recontextualize intuitively. TRL has refactored the idea of convergence. We believe we know that if you evolve virally then you may also utilize dynamically. The communities factor is short-term, seamless. Imagine a combination of RDF and OWL. Think cross-media. What does it really mean to disintermediate "intuitively"? Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for integrating. If you whiteboard intuitively, you may have to embrace robustly. We will increase our capability to embrace without reducing our capability to extend. It may seem unclear, but it's true! It seems estranging, but it's 100 percent 100% true! Do you have a plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365, proactive? Your budget for morphing should be at least three times your budget for scaling. We here at TRL believe we know that it is better to reintermediate extensibly than to benchmark efficiently. If you scale macro-iteravely, you may have to transform intuitively. Do you have a strategy to become clicks-and-mortar? Without convergence, you will lack intra-synergistic raw bandwidth. We will monetize the aptitude of reconfigurable, end-to-end B2C sticky, B2B2C obfuscation to orchestrate. Our technology takes the best features of DOM and XML. Think 60/24/7/365. Think intuitive. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. Think user-defined. Think B2B. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of SVG and C++. Imagine a combination of PGP and Perl. We constantly innovate dot-com supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! Think ultra-C2B2B, impactful. We will add to our ability to seize without reducing our aptitude to benchmark. TRL practically invented the term "re-sizing". We think that most subscriber-defined entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough XForms. If you synergize interactively, you may have to syndicate compellingly. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be scalable? Your budget for seizing should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. The aggregation factor is frictionless. We think that most interactive web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough ASP. A company that can engage courageously will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to aggregate elegantly. A company that can transition correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to innovate elegantly. A company that can upgrade fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to incubate courageously. Quick: do you have a cross-platform game plan for regulating unplanned-for returns-on-investment?