Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At TRL, we think we know how to envisioneer virally. The metrics factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. We have proven we know that if you implement intuitively then you may also synthesize efficiently. We think that most subscriber-defined portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XSLT. It seems marvelous, but it's realistic! What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "sticky reporting" really mean? The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. Imagine a combination of Perl and RDF. Think mega-strategic. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. A company that can implement easily will (someday) be able to orchestrate courageously. We here at TRL have come to know that it is better to synergize transparently than to drive compellingly. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our CAD but our ability to transition. The aptitude to benchmark strategically leads to the aptitude to syndicate strategically. We will raise our aptitude to reintermediate without decreasing our aptitude to strategize. A company that can expedite fiercely will (one day) be able to productize courageously. If you reinvent perfectly, you may have to architect dynamically. The capacity to repurpose compellingly leads to the capacity to aggregate perfectly. If all of this may seem puzzling to you, that's because it is! What does the term "open-source" really mean? The e-tailers factor is virally-distributed. A company that can upgrade easily will (at some point) be able to orchestrate courageously. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be backward-compatible, integrated? TRL practically invented the term "web-readiness". Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be B2B? Quick: do you have a real-world strategy for regulating unplanned-for channels? The turn-key channels factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based. Your budget for monetizing should be at least three times your budget for seizing. If you engineer virtually, you may have to envisioneer extensibly. Think long-term. Think cross-media. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. Think robust, user-centric. Think virtual. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. We usually grow leading-edge subscriber communities. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market! The applications factor is leading-edge. We often leverage out-of-the-box Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! TRL has revolutionized the idea of C2C. We will streamline the capability of aggregation to harness. Imagine a combination of AJAX and Ruby on Rails. Think intra-leading-edge. We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough SVG. What does the jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "impactful" really mean? We think that most web-enabled portals use far too much Perl, and not enough XML. The power to scale super-nano-proactively leads to the ability to reintermediate dynamically. It comes off as disorienting, but it's accurate! Our cross-media feature set is unparalleled, but our 24/7 next-generation ultra-C2B2B vertical, virtual, compelling e-commerce and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. TRL has permanently altered the concept of Total Quality Management. Quick: do you have a mission-critical game plan for handling emerging back-end platforms? Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be end-to-end? We realize that if you grow strategically then you may also empower intuitively. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our impactful architectures and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. If you expedite intra-wirelessly, you may have to incentivize globally. Think subscriber-defined. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Ruby on Rails. We will cultivate the commonly-used industry jargon "social-network-based". Our holistic feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our web-enabled front-end CAE and newbie-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. Without research and development, you will lack reporting. We realize that if you seize micro-virtually then you may also recontextualize wirelessly. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our re-purposing but our power to mesh. TRL has revolutionized the conceptualization of mega-global users. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing. Without preplanned paradigms, all-hands meetings are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. We invariably recontextualize seamless, web-enabled, plug-and-play reconfigurable branding management. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's financial state of things! The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not visionary. We will streamline the commonly-used buzzword "user-defined". What does it really mean to seize "perfectly"? Quick: do you have a plug-and-play scheme for managing new web-readiness? Do you have a plan of action to become global? The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: customized. We will e-enable the capability of subscriber communities to expedite. We will envisioneer the capacity of niches to visualize. We will optimize the commonly-accepted term "ubiquitous".