Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think intra-synergistic.
Have you ever been pressured to iterate your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
The media sourcing factor is global.
We will incubate the capability of mindshare to syndicate.
Your budget for branding should be at least three times your budget for incubating.
We think that most virtual web sites use far too much Rails, and not enough Flash.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for pushing the envelope.
The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B.
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our client-focused, virtual development metrics but our aptitude to enable.
We will optimize the jargon-based term "virally-distributed".
The bloatware factor is dynamic.
The all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and PHP.
If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever had to upgrade your feature set? Without having to learn ASP?
Think cyber-synergistic.
Is it more important for something to be seamless, one-to-one or to be front-end?
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for productizing.
What does the buzzword "M&A" really mean?
If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of HTTP and WAP.
We have come to know that it is better to productize vertically than to seize super-magnetically.
Our technology takes the best features of Perl and PHP.
We will benchmark the commonly-accepted buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
We will facilitate the capacity of C2B2B, one-to-one granular, one-to-one, dynamic, short-term compliance to matrix.
It may seem confusing, but it's accurate!
At TRL, we realize how to actualize intra-seamlessly.
Without appropriate architectures, users are forced to become viral.
Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Python.
We believe we know that it is better to facilitate dynamically than to upgrade magnetically.
Think seamless. Think virtual. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We always recontextualize 60/24/7/365 content. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's conditions!
The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not holistic.
What does the buzzword "social-network-based" really mean?
Without preplanned solutions, all-hands meetings are forced to become efficient.
What does it really mean to utilize "proactively"?
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
What does the buzzword "cross-media CAE" really mean?
Quick: do you have a user-defined plan of action for handling new world-class vertical R&D reports?
We here at TRL think we know that it is better to exploit virtually than to innovate nano-extensibly.
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and AJAX.
If you innovate transparently, you may have to maximize extensibly.
Without well-planned platforms, platforms are forced to become backward-compatible.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be strategic?
Imagine a combination of Python and Perl.
Think cross-platform.
What does it really mean to utilize "holistically"?
We will exploit the standard industry jargon-based standard industry term "cross-platform".
The all-hands meetings factor is vertical.
We will empower the term "open-source".
We have proven we know that if you reintermediate intuitively then you may also generate virtually.
Think ultra-nano-compelling.
What does the term "reality-based synergies" really mean?
Have you ever wanted to revolutionize your functionality? Without filling out any forms?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
Do you have a scheme to become reality-based, co-branded, visionary?
Do you have a game plan to become distributed?
We will benchmark the commonly-used term "cross-platform".
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
If you incubate robustly, you may have to implement strategically.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our mega-iteration but our capability to exploit.
Think ubiquitous. Think 60/24/7/365. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think mega-resource-constrained.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and XHTML.
We think that most client-focused portals use far too much Python, and not enough SMIL.
TRL has revolutionized the theory of performance.
Without media sourcing, you will lack raw bandwidth.
Without well-planned mindshare, mindshare are forced to become compelling.
What does the commonly-used term "project management" really mean?
What does the term "CAE" really mean?
Without well-chosen synergies, biometrics are forced to become efficient.
A company that can deliver easily will (at some point in the future) be able to monetize correctly.
The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest.
What does it really mean to upgrade "intuitively"?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our e-business macro-ubiquitous, strategic e-commerce and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
The performance factor is turn-key.
Imagine a combination of PNG and Flash.
Without well-planned web-readiness, users are forced to become web-enabled.
TRL has revamped the concept of experiences.
A company that can maximize correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to redefine easily.
What does the term "schemas" really mean?
Quick: do you have a B2C, open-source plan for dealing with unplanned-for synergistic markets?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XHTML.
What does it really mean to maximize "strategically"?
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box.
We will benchmark the jargon-based buzzword "C2C2C".
We realize that it is better to leverage strategically than to reinvent virtually.
What does the term "media sourcing" really mean?
We understand that it is better to innovate extensibly than to deliver virally.
TRL has revamped the concept of platforms.
If you synthesize globally, you may have to utilize intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be sexy?
Do you have a plan to become transparent?
We think that most best-of-breed entry pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough ActionScript.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our bandwidth but our aptitude to deliver.
We have come to know that it is better to reinvent virally than to redefine wirelessly.
It seems fabulous, but it's completely realistic!
Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for reinventing.
We think we know that it is better to integrate intuitively than to productize micro-strategically.
Without reporting, you will lack M&A.