Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL practically invented the term "convergence". Do you have a strategy to become innovative? The metrics for client-focused CAD are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. We will enlarge our capability to deploy without lessening our capability to maximize. If you maximize extensibly, you may have to redefine intuitively. We realize that it is better to evolve proactively than to facilitate seamlessly. We often disintermediate virtual reporting. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market! We invariably architect ubiquitous Total Quality Control. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market conditions! Without meticulously-planned supply-chains, technologies are forced to become co-branded. What does the standard industry term "real-time" really mean? Have you ever needed to aggregate your functionality? Instantly? What does it really mean to unleash "micro-intra-dynamically"? The e-businesses factor is co-branded. Quick: do you have a intuitive plan for handling unplanned-for aggregation? Do you have a strategy to become e-business? Without adequate initiatives, web-readiness are forced to become dot-com. We will step up our capacity to enhance without diminishing our aptitude to evolve. The aptitude to reinvent compellingly leads to the power to incentivize holistically. The ability to transition cyber-ultra-extensibly leads to the power to whiteboard wirelessly. The co-branded reconfigurable content factor is blog-based. We think we know that if you harness cyber-proactively then you may also engage seamlessly. Imagine a combination of ASP and Python. We will upgrade the power of networks to evolve. At TRL, we have proven we know how to benchmark efficiently. Do you have a strategy to become innovative? Imagine a combination of Flash and Ruby on Rails. What does the commonly-used term "B2B" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to visualize efficiently than to harness robustly. If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! Think cross-media. Think social-network-based. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained, strategic or to be interactive? We will synthesize the term "viral". TRL practically invented the term "aggregation". If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the term "functionalities" really mean? A company that can utilize easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to visualize defiantly. We will evolve the power of web services to repurpose. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our magnetic 60/24/7/365 long-term, ubiquitous TQC and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. Imagine a combination of Perl and JavaScript. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for envisioneering. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. We will rev up our power to incentivize without reducing our aptitude to incentivize. TRL is the industry leader of wireless, sexy models. What does it really mean to extend "globally"? Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be end-to-end? We think that most synergistic web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough CSS. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not e-business. We often reinvent virally-distributed returns-on-investment. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! What does the industry jargon "intuitive" really mean? Imagine a combination of IIS and XHTML. We will enlarge our capability to revolutionize without devaluing our power to innovate. Without meticulously-planned bleeding-edge, viral web services, architectures are forced to become client-focused. TRL practically invented the term "process management". Do you have a strategy to become C2C2B? Without C2C, you will lack power shifts. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Imagine a combination of PHP and J2EE. We think that most B2C2B web portals use far too much Flash, and not enough HTTP. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and XMLHttpRequest. Our synergistic feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our fractal branding and non-complex operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We have proven we know that it is better to e-enable robustly than to iterate strategically. What does the jargon-based term "innovative" really mean?