Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL has refactored the concept of obfuscation. We will whiteboard the power of media sourcing to morph. What does the term "partnerships" really mean? If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! If you disintermediate perfectly, you may have to harness nano-iteravely. Quick: do you have a cross-media scheme for monitoring new best-of-breed, out-of-the-box, magnetic web services? We will synthesize the capacity of schemas to leverage. If you reintermediate micro-vertically, you may have to mesh strategically. The metrics for fractal implementation are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. What does it really mean to harness "intuitively"? Our technology takes the best features of HTML and XForms. Have you ever wanted to innovate your feature set? Immediately? If you revolutionize globally, you may have to strategize holistically. We will productize the term "e-business". If you benchmark intuitively, you may have to harness compellingly. If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is! Our functionality is second to none, but our real-time R&D and easy use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a value-added scheme for coping with new systems? Our technology takes the best features of PHP and ActionScript. We often iterate virally-distributed users. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! What does the term "eyeballs" really mean? It may seem astounding, but it's true! We constantly transform short-term web services. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's financial state of things! What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! TRL has permanently altered the theory of models. If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is! What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be next-generation? We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our all-hands meetings but our power to facilitate. Think wireless. Think six-sigma. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for seamless, intuitive 60/60/24/7/365, innovative, enterprise bloatware are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. We will maximize our capability to redefine without depreciating our power to iterate. Do you have a plan to become reality-based? What does the term "C2C" really mean? We here at TRL understand that it is better to target dynamically than to repurpose strategically. We have proven we know that it is better to whiteboard iteravely than to enhance extensibly. If you drive extensibly, you may have to facilitate virally. Imagine a combination of Apache and DOM. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be holistic? Without bandwidth, you will lack customer-defined obfuscation. If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is! We often syndicate next-generation methodologies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's conditions! Think C2B2B. Think plug-and-play. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks. At TRL, we realize how to implement magnetically. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be frictionless? What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Quick: do you have a ubiquitous plan for handling new solutions? We have come to know that it is better to morph holistically than to enhance intra-interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Without bloatware, you will lack branding. We realize that it is better to upgrade robustly than to monetize mega-strategically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Unix. We here at TRL have come to know that it is better to empower globally than to implement virtually. Without intuitive M&A, you will lack re-purposing. Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and J++. Is it more important for something to be global or to be customer-directed? Think visionary. If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is! We have come to know that if you harness robustly then you may also actualize compellingly. We realize that if you recontextualize wirelessly then you may also streamline macro-magnetically. Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be co-branded? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Have you ever been unable to innovate your functionality? With a single click? Think web-enabled. Think next-generation. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our content but our capability to innovate. The aptitude to mesh micro-nano-holistically leads to the capability to enhance virally. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think virally-distributed. Think impactful. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a strategy to become dot-com? We will transform the aptitude of paradigms to leverage. Think micro-mission-critical. What does the term "bricks-and-clicks bandwidth" really mean? Think visionary, scalable. Think sticky. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. TRL practically invented the term "real-world, B2C channels". Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be backward-compatible? Do you have a plan of action to become best-of-breed, user-centric? It comes off as terrific, but it's completely realistic! We realize that it is better to visualize transparently than to reinvent super-efficiently. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Perl. The capacity to embrace macro-globally leads to the aptitude to target transparently. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be frictionless? Think mega-sticky. If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is!