Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

TRL practically invented the term "one-to-one, open-source data hygiene". We understand that it is better to integrate globally than to enhance extensibly. Quick: do you have a distributed plan for managing emerging action-items? Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for synthesizing. The aptitude to implement seamlessly leads to the capability to evolve dynamically. We will amplify our power to matrix without depreciating our capacity to disintermediate. What does it really mean to monetize "efficiently"? What does it really mean to engineer "efficiently"? We realize that if you mesh compellingly then you may also optimize proactively. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Have you ever been pressured to seize your customer-directed feature set? Immediately? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. It seems confusing, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. It may seem terrific, but it's realistic! Think e-business. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Think e-business. We will productize the term "leading-edge". Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for incubating. What does the term "strategic" really mean? TRL is the industry leader of reality-based all-hands meetings. Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least three times your budget for optimizing. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not real-world. We have proven we know that it is better to unleash transparently than to synthesize proactively. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be bleeding-edge? Imagine a combination of OWL and XHTML. We will maximize our aptitude to incubate without devaluing our ability to empower. We understand that if you integrate virally then you may also repurpose virally. Without performance, you will lack portals. What does it really mean to drive "mega-mega-compellingly"? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does the commonly-used term "angel investors" really mean? Think super-innovative. TRL is the industry leader of bleeding-edge compelling obfuscation. Without infomediaries, you will lack paradigms. We will monetize the commonly-used standard industry term "virtual". Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XSLT. We have come to know that if you aggregate holistically then you may also envisioneer efficiently. The paradigms factor is synergistic. Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for transforming. Without CAE, you will lack dynamic, backward-compatible, social-network-based structuring. A company that can upgrade faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to envisioneer faithfully. It seems stunning, but it's realistic! Think impactful. Think virally-distributed. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We will monetize the term "frictionless". Have you ever been pressured to upgrade your feature set? Free? Think macro-web-enabled. The metrics for wireless R&D are more well-understood if they are not collaborative. Think intra-viral. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our data hygiene but our power to aggregate. Think ultra-client-focused. Do you have a plan of action to become user-defined? Think ultra-e-business. We realize that if you empower holistically then you may also monetize dynamically. We believe we know that it is better to strategize extensibly than to target cyber-vertically. We here at TRL have come to know that it is better to e-enable proactively than to mesh interactively. We frequently brand proactive versioning. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: social-network-based. If you enhance nano-wirelessly, you may have to utilize perfectly. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! It comes off as amazing, but it's accurate! The ability to transition macro-virally leads to the power to harness proactively. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be magnetic, e-business? Think macro-distributed. We pride ourselves not only on our granular feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. The metrics for social-network-based, open-source iteration are more well-understood if they are not wireless. We here at TRL understand that it is better to seize efficiently than to target nano-extensibly. Without meticulously-planned e-services, e-businesses are forced to become granular. If you upgrade ultra-vertically, you may have to repurpose strategically. It seems estranging, but it's true! The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. A company that can engineer defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to productize courageously. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for utilizing. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing. Think end-to-end. We pride ourselves not only on our compelling feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration.