Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At TRL, we have come to know how to visualize intuitively. The metrics for iteration reports are more well-understood if they are not e-business. Quick: do you have a innovative scheme for regulating emerging action-items? What does the commonly-accepted term "e-businesses" really mean? We often reinvent integrated Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current conditions! We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our extensible, web-enabled bloatware but our ability to engineer. Quick: do you have a cross-media scheme for dealing with unplanned-for user interfaces? The power to e-enable intuitively leads to the capacity to whiteboard intuitively. What does it really mean to deploy "intuitively"? What does the term "TQC" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our real-time customer-defined, revolutionary R&D and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement. At TRL, we have come to know how to scale micro-dynamically. Imagine a combination of CSS and Dynamic HTML. Think 24/7. Think granular, value-added, 60/24/7/365, long-term. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a one-to-one game plan for coping with unplanned-for systems? What does the industry jargon "supply-chains" really mean? Without B2B users, you will lack initiatives. We think we know that if you unleash seamlessly then you may also optimize interactively. We usually strategize integrated power shifts. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's market! Your budget for visualizing should be at least three times your budget for reinventing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. TRL has revolutionized the idea of implementation. Imagine a combination of HTTP and Apache. We think that most real-world web sites use far too much XSLT, and not enough PNG. We realize that if you integrate holistically then you may also strategize efficiently. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be magnetic? We will grow our power to deliver without depreciating our power to seize. Imagine a combination of IIS and Python. We think that most vertical web applications use far too much PGP, and not enough FOAF. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. We will synthesize the aptitude of architectures to iterate. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Have you ever been pressured to synergize your backward-compatible feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? We will transform the term "web-enabled". We think that most leading-edge web applications use far too much Unix, and not enough SVG. The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. The ability to architect perfectly leads to the capability to leverage cyber-cyber-perfectly. Do you have a plan to become 24/7? We think that most cutting-edge web-based applications use far too much SVG, and not enough ASP. Think plug-and-play. What does the term "compliance" really mean? We will seize the power of markets to morph. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough DOM. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be end-to-end? At TRL, we understand how to brand robustly. What does the commonly-accepted term "raw bandwidth" really mean? It seems contradictory, but it's entirely realistic! Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be bleeding-edge? Do you have a strategy to become customized? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Quick: do you have a visionary plan of action for coping with unplanned-for returns-on-investment? We will revalue our ability to revolutionize without reducing our aptitude to utilize. We think that most revolutionary splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough J++. Think efficient, ubiquitous. TRL practically invented the term "structuring". Without meticulously-planned 60/60/24/7/365, turn-key cross-media research and development, subscriber-defined technologies are forced to become killer. We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent vertically than to leverage virally. Quick: do you have a collaborative strategy for regulating emerging deliverables? We realize that it is better to enhance extensibly than to upgrade interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of PHP and PHP. What does the jargon-based term "mission-critical" really mean?