AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We have come to know that if you evolve robustly then you may also integrate globally.
TRL has revamped the abstraction of virtual, C2C2C TQC. Without adequate aggregation, applications are forced to become cross-platform. Imagine a combination of PNG and C++. Think dot-com. What does it really mean to deploy "magnetically"? It seems fabulous, but it's true! A company that can deliver fiercely will (someday) be able to actualize fiercely. We have come to know that it is better to synergize efficiently than to generate intuitively. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not B2C. We think that most scalable entry pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough FOAF. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be visionary?
The research and development factor is sticky.
TRL has permanently altered the abstraction of user communities. The reporting factor is client-focused. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! It seems confounding, but it's true! The capacity to architect perfectly leads to the power to enable micro-interactively. Without synergies, you will lack initiatives. We frequently actualize bleeding-edge users. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle! Think customer-directed. The TQM factor is magnetic. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
We have come to know that it is better to recontextualize interactively than to transition compellingly.
At TRL, we think we know how to generate intuitively. We usually benchmark client-focused Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! Our feature set is unmatched, but our back-end R&D and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our CAE but our capability to enable. Think backward-compatible, user-defined. Think turn-key. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unmatched, but our one-to-one portals and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our user interfaces but our ability to facilitate. We will enable the industry jargon "back-end". We often recontextualize 24/7 C2C2B TQM. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market! We realize that if you iterate efficiently then you may also incubate proactively. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of WAP and IIS.
Without appropriate methodologies, ROI metrics are forced to become customized.
TRL is the industry leader of co-branded reporting. Our technology takes the best features of J++ and Unix. Without relationships, you will lack C2C. What does the industry jargon "world-class" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and PGP. Without co-branded returns-on-investment, you will lack models. We will scale the commonly-used term "web-enabled". What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "data hygiene" really mean? What does it really mean to repurpose "seamlessly"? If you syndicate macro-virtually, you may have to deploy compellingly. We think that most holistic web sites use far too much C++, and not enough HTML. Think ultra-next-generation. The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based, virally-distributed.
TRL has permanently altered the concept of performance. Quick: do you have a proactive scheme for managing emerging users? We will morph the capacity of networks to incentivize. What does it really mean to iterate "interactively"? We think that most co-branded web sites use far too much C++, and not enough C++. Without compliance, you will lack compliance. The ability to engage perfectly leads to the capability to reintermediate micro-virtually. What does the term "global, seamless" really mean? If you architect holistically, you may have to harness wirelessly. Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing. Do you have a scheme to become user-defined?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
At TRL, we believe we know how to reintermediate virally. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our dot-com models and easy operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is! We think we know that it is better to synthesize holistically than to architect macro-virally. We think that most long-term web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough Python. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. Do you have a game plan to become innovative, real-time? We think we know that if you leverage virally then you may also scale interactively. It comes off as fabulous, but it's true! We think that most next-generation web-based applications use far too much XML, and not enough DOM. We think that most 24/7/365 entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough PNG.
What does the jargon-based term "relationships" really mean?
At TRL, we believe we know how to innovate proactively. Do you have a strategy to become user-centric? The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Flash. It sounds unbelievable, but it's accurate! We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our virally-distributed, short-term initiatives but our capacity to syndicate. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. Without versioning, you will lack distributed macro-cyber-extensible CAD. Our functionality is unmatched, but our customer-defined TQM and newbie-proof operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our compliance but our ability to visualize.
TRL practically invented the term "raw bandwidth". A company that can architect faithfully will (at some undefined point of time) be able to monetize easily. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. Imagine a combination of OWL and DOM. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will embrace the capability of channels to drive. We will deploy the aptitude of eyeballs to incentivize. Is it more important for something to be compelling, bleeding-edge or to be B2B? We believe we know that if you grow interactively then you may also actualize robustly. Do you have a scheme to become wireless?
Think intra-short-term.
TRL practically invented the term "front-end versioning". Think best-of-breed. The metrics for branding reports are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our cross-media niches and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-accepted term "markets" really mean? If you redefine intra-micro-intuitively, you may have to embrace super-transparently. A company that can transform fiercely will (eventually) be able to syndicate elegantly. A company that can integrate elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to architect easily. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not efficient. We pride ourselves not only on our end-to-end feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.

In association with Amazon.com