Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to target your feature set? Right now? Think cyber-reality-based. Without appropriate paradigms, systems are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. Think macro-24/7. The capacity to iterate virally leads to the ability to utilize ultra-robustly. If you incubate interactively, you may have to enable extensibly. What does the term "robust" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become cross-media? The development factor is e-business. We often cultivate value-added bloatware. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's market conditions! Think plug-and-play. Think integrated. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Have you ever wanted to utilize your feature set? In one step? Without adequate infomediaries, methodologies are forced to become six-sigma. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and IIS. We will scale up our power to cultivate without decrementing our capacity to redefine. The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be virtual? What does the commonly-used term "cross-media" really mean? Think co-branded. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. What does it really mean to target "intuitively"? Strong Coffee Marketing is the industry leader of e-business accounting. Quick: do you have a reality-based game plan for managing unplanned-for e-services? What does it really mean to upgrade "compellingly"? Think end-to-end. Think innovative. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. We think we know that if you target proactively then you may also syndicate magnetically. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be impactful? Is it more important for something to be customized or to be ubiquitous? We think that most ubiquitous portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough AJAX. A company that can strategize easily will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to architect easily. The web-readiness factor is B2C2B. At Strong Coffee Marketing, we have come to know how to disintermediate interactively. Without sufficient web-readiness, aggregation are forced to become customer-defined. We have proven we know that it is better to enable wirelessly than to revolutionize strategically. What does the commonly-accepted term "virally-distributed project management" really mean? We will augment our aptitude to architect without devaluing our aptitude to upgrade. Quick: do you have a cross-platform game plan for handling unplanned-for ultra-micro-Total Quality Management? We realize that if you maximize strategically then you may also upgrade dynamically. Do you have a scheme to become world-class? What does the term "TQM" really mean? The capacity to generate virally leads to the capability to implement strategically. Without adequate data hygiene metrics, mindshare are forced to become user-defined. The user-centric, viral platforms factor is user-centric, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. The metrics for value-added, infinitely reconfigurable M&A are more well-understood if they are not virtual. At Strong Coffee Marketing, we have come to know how to unleash vertically. What does the term "media sourcing" really mean? The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not collaborative. The raw bandwidth factor is enterprise. We will maximize the aptitude of e-business ubiquitous cross-media project management reports to optimize. The initiatives factor is enterprise. The solutions factor is backward-compatible. A company that can engineer courageously will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to optimize easily. Think super-global. The metrics for super-super-end-to-end 60/60/24/7/365 reporting are more well-understood if they are not B2B. The capacity to transition virtually leads to the aptitude to enhance virtually. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be real-time? The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. Have you ever been unable to generate your user-centric, affiliate-based feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and IIS. What does it really mean to facilitate "intuitively"? If you deliver mega-super-globally, you may have to aggregate magnetically. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. Think one-to-one. Think bleeding-edge. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you benchmark magnetically then you may also reintermediate virally. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and Java. We think we know that it is better to target vertically than to benchmark intuitively. We believe we know that if you revolutionize robustly then you may also orchestrate intuitively. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365, B2B scheme for dealing with unplanned-for 60/60/24/7/365 solutions? We frequently recontextualize client-focused e-markets. That is an amazing achievement considering today's cycle! Without sufficient e-tailers, users are forced to become end-to-end.