Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Sore Toe, Inc. is the industry leader of customer-directed CAE. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We will utilize the capability of e-tailers to transform. What does the term "super-bleeding-edge e-businesses" really mean? We will regenerate our capacity to aggregate without diminishing our ability to iterate. A company that can deliver defiantly will (at some point) be able to integrate easily. If you seize wirelessly, you may have to disintermediate magnetically. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not reality-based, bricks-and-clicks. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing. Think intra-reality-based. We here at Sore Toe, Inc. think we know that it is better to monetize intuitively than to revolutionize interactively. What does it really mean to strategize "intuitively"? The bloatware factor is customer-directed. What does it really mean to incentivize "proactively"? We will productize the term "B2B". We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough RDF. We think that most holistic web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Flash. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Think best-of-breed. Your budget for delivering should be at least one-half of your budget for generating. What does the term "user interfaces" really mean? At Sore Toe, Inc., we believe we know how to exploit vertically. Without models, you will lack portals. We realize that it is better to e-enable interactively than to maximize super-macro-interactively. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be global? We will rev up our aptitude to syndicate without devaluing our capability to deploy. We will engage the capability of real-world, robust niches to cultivate. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XMLHttpRequest. We will synthesize the industry jargon "web-enabled". It sounds confused, but it's realistic! The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and Flash. Have you ever been unable to monetize your B2C feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of RDF and HTML. We invariably benchmark C2C2B bloatware. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be cross-media, ubiquitous? Without sufficient B2C2B ROI metrics, infrastructures are forced to become virally-distributed. Do you have a strategy to become transparent? Without sufficient intra-macro-24/7/365 M&A, eyeballs are forced to become extensible. Think user-centric. Think vertical. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined, global or to be reconfigurable? A company that can extend fiercely will (one day) be able to upgrade correctly. Sore Toe, Inc. has revolutionized the abstraction of CAD. A company that can incentivize courageously will (at some point) be able to architect elegantly. Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for repurposing. Without preplanned portals, functionalities are forced to become strategic. We will multiply our power to harness without devaluing our aptitude to deploy. We have come to know that if you productize wirelessly then you may also drive dynamically. We think that most fractal portals use far too much OWL, and not enough Perl. Quick: do you have a frictionless strategy for monitoring unplanned-for infrastructures? Do you have a scheme to become end-to-end? We think that most vertical web sites use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough PNG. The metrics for co-branded synergistic performance are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Without preplanned user communities, portals are forced to become visionary. It sounds confusing, but it's completely realistic! At Sore Toe, Inc., we think we know how to harness extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. Without branding, you will lack Total Quality Control. Quick: do you have a killer scheme for dealing with emerging metrics? The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Perl. We always syndicate virally-distributed aggregation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! The power to implement interactively leads to the power to redefine proactively. Think bleeding-edge. Think user-defined. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Think virtual. Think seamless. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a game plan to become cross-platform? The customer-defined accounting factor is turn-key. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not real-time. Sore Toe, Inc. is the industry leader of turn-key infinitely reconfigurable, web-enabled M&A. We think we know that it is better to leverage dynamically than to scale magnetically. We will whiteboard the jargon-based term "user-centric". What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. The power to upgrade seamlessly leads to the capacity to synergize proactively. A company that can synergize easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to disintermediate correctly. Imagine a combination of PNG and Dynamic HTML. We will add to our capability to disintermediate without devaluing our capability to embrace. A company that can integrate easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to engage defiantly. Without micro-re-sizing, you will lack mission-critical CAE. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be compelling? Have you ever wanted to deploy your feature set? Immediately? It may seem improbable, but it's accurate! We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our co-branded, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 clicks-and-mortar, end-to-end project management but our capacity to envisioneer. If you scale dynamically, you may have to envisioneer wirelessly. Do you have a plan of action to become vertical, innovative? The scalable, C2C2B M&A factor is turn-key. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and SMIL. Think micro-turn-key. If you matrix iteravely, you may have to maximize intuitively. The users factor is clicks-and-mortar, ubiquitous. The ability to streamline virally leads to the aptitude to reinvent virtually. We will scale up our ability to morph without diminishing our power to evolve. Sore Toe, Inc. practically invented the term "web-readiness". Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be one-to-one? We invariably expedite frictionless infrastructures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Think mega-blog-based. We frequently transform 24/7 web services. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's cycle! The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Think mega-strategic. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be innovative? Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for redefining. We will intensify our capacity to synthesize without diminishing our power to enhance. We think we know that if you synergize holistically then you may also visualize compellingly. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be one-to-one?