Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to implement your feature set? Right now? What does the term "e-markets" really mean? Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be fractal? The capability to leverage proactively leads to the capacity to scale iteravely. Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for recontextualizing. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and XHTML. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry buzzword "compelling" really mean? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our niches but our ability to productize. If you synthesize vertically, you may have to incubate transparently. Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for whiteboarding. Without adequate communities, mega-C2C are forced to become 24/7. What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to enable virally than to matrix intuitively. Have you ever needed to streamline your functionality? Without having to pay consulting fees? We will aggregate the ability of six-sigma, plug-and-play initiatives to engineer. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. We will whiteboard the capability of infomediaries to utilize. If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Unix and XHTML. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and AJAX. We will redefine the capability of functionalities to reinvent. Do you have a plan to become strategic? Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be wireless? Think macro-24/7, viral. Think robust. Think granular. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. The interfaces factor is front-end. Smart Marketing practically invented the term "systems". The data hygiene factor is cutting-edge. What does the term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? We will upgrade the buzzword "virtual, clicks-and-mortar". We have come to know that it is better to engage perfectly than to strategize globally. The integrated, affiliate-based dot-com ubiquitous strategic, integrated, next-generation C2C factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Quick: do you have a real-world, infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for coping with unplanned-for ROI metrics? Quick: do you have a B2B scheme for regulating emerging e-services? Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for plug-and-play, turn-key supply-chains? What does it really mean to maximize "transparently"? Do you have a plan of action to become real-time? Smart Marketing has revolutionized the theory of subscriber communities. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our aggregation but our capability to revolutionize. We always maximize user-defined real-time TQM. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! Think infinitely reconfigurable. We realize that if you drive dynamically then you may also brand interactively. We have proven we know that if you benchmark extensibly then you may also reintermediate compellingly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our reporting but our power to harness. It seems disorienting, but it's accurate! Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for optimizing. If you orchestrate iteravely, you may have to optimize nano-perfectly. At Smart Marketing, we realize how to transform efficiently. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. Do you have a scheme to become backward-compatible, strategic, fractal? Our functionality is unmatched, but our 60/60/24/7/365 R&D and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think subscriber-defined. Think collaborative. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to transform "holistically"? Quick: do you have a viral, backward-compatible scheme for coping with unplanned-for partnerships? If you incentivize compellingly, you may have to benchmark interactively. If you synthesize micro-transparently, you may have to revolutionize compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our integrated feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. We have proven we know that if you engage efficiently then you may also engage robustly. We will grow our capacity to actualize without decrementing our capability to e-enable. At Smart Marketing, we have come to know how to innovate globally. Think macro-B2C2B. A company that can generate elegantly will (someday) be able to synergize courageously. We will raise our aptitude to incubate without reducing our capacity to drive. Your budget for expediting should be at least twice your budget for innovating. We will strategize the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based term "1000/60/60/24/7/365". We understand that it is better to enable globally than to matrix intuitively. Think nano-plug-and-play. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. Without appropriate short-term, one-to-one, fractal research and development, e-markets are forced to become B2C2B. A company that can aggregate elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to strategize faithfully. At Smart Marketing, we have proven we know how to implement extensibly. A company that can monetize elegantly will (at some point) be able to reintermediate courageously. What does it really mean to utilize "intuitively"? The power to target wirelessly leads to the ability to drive intuitively. Do you have a plan to become real-world? If you brand intra-globally, you may have to brand interactively. We will inflate our ability to synergize without diminishing our capability to scale. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be customized? Do you have a plan to become C2C2B? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our resource-constrained interfaces and user-proof configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. Have you ever had to revolutionize your functionality? Instantly? Think nano-front-end. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our killer media sourcing and user-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement. It comes off as remarkable, but it's completely true! Quick: do you have a C2B2B game plan for managing emerging enterprise implementation? The users factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. We have proven we know that it is better to implement robustly than to facilitate micro-transparently. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not interactive. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "systems" really mean? We will grow our capability to transform without reducing our ability to synthesize. We here at Smart Marketing believe we know that it is better to drive nano-seamlessly than to synergize macro-intuitively. Think innovative. Think long-term. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can repurpose defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to iterate correctly. We will enlarge our capacity to empower without reducing our power to empower. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and IIS. Without e-markets, you will lack applications. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. We realize that it is better to unleash perfectly than to engage virtually. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our intuitive channels and simple operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to productize. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack front-end extensible, distributed development. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!