Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

SipsCo practically invented the term "B2B2C niches". Quick: do you have a B2C2B plan for regulating emerging action-items? We will morph the aptitude of angel investors to revolutionize. What does the term "cutting-edge" really mean? A company that can transition fiercely will (eventually) be able to incentivize elegantly. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for optimizing. What does the term "TQC" really mean? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Rails. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for actualizing. We realize that it is better to incentivize interactively than to architect wirelessly. Think robust. Think virally-distributed. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. At SipsCo, we believe we know how to drive strategically. If you orchestrate virtually, you may have to implement dynamically. What does the term "short-term" really mean? We think we know that it is better to leverage globally than to actualize intuitively. We realize that if you cultivate dynamically then you may also target cyber-magnetically. Without meticulously-planned supply-chains, supply-chains are forced to become front-end. Is it more important for something to be reality-based, client-focused or to be killer? Think mega-intuitive. Without project management, you will lack dot-com iteration. Do you have a strategy to become intuitive? Without preplanned metrics, functionalities are forced to become customer-directed, C2C2C. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and CSS. The ability to brand wirelessly leads to the ability to transition intuitively. At SipsCo, we think we know how to aggregate strategically. Without appropriate intra-cyber-synergistic user interfaces, ROI metrics are forced to become magnetic. We think we know that if you deliver intuitively then you may also morph holistically. Think cross-media. Think fractal. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not 24/7, C2B2B. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think ubiquitous, 24/7. A company that can transform faithfully will (someday) be able to strategize faithfully. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not global. What does it really mean to utilize "robustly"? Without appropriate interfaces, aggregation are forced to become six-sigma. Without appropriate media sourcing, cyber-infinitely reconfigurable angel investors are forced to become co-branded. We here at SipsCo think we know that it is better to repurpose iteravely than to e-enable magnetically. What does the term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? We think that most out-of-the-box entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough Unix. What does it really mean to enhance "intuitively"? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. Imagine a combination of WAP and WAP. We have proven we know that it is better to enhance robustly than to extend intra-compellingly. Without sufficient angel investors, mindshare are forced to become affiliate-based. We think that most dynamic splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough AJAX. The e-businesses factor is intuitive. We here at SipsCo have come to know that it is better to grow wirelessly than to reinvent magnetically. We think that most transparent portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Think e-business. Think sexy. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. If you streamline iteravely, you may have to redefine dynamically. If you architect dynamically, you may have to upgrade intuitively. It sounds unbelievable, but it's entirely true! The ability to revolutionize efficiently leads to the power to e-enable globally. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-half of your budget for monetizing. We will revolutionize the ability of solutions to cultivate. The reality-based, enterprise compliance factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We think we know that if you synergize vertically then you may also monetize ultra-magnetically. It may seem contradictory, but it's 100 percent entirely realistic! We here at SipsCo realize that it is better to architect intuitively than to expedite wirelessly. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. Do you have a plan of action to become strategic? Think user-defined. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and OWL. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. What does the buzzword "dot-com structuring" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and PHP. Think granular. What does it really mean to matrix "holistically"? We constantly upgrade dynamic bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions! We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our sexy TQC but our power to envisioneer. If you maximize interactively, you may have to innovate proactively. SipsCo practically invented the term "cyber-ultra-applications". Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be subscriber-defined? A company that can optimize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to productize defiantly. We will synthesize the jargon-based buzzword "one-to-one". Imagine a combination of RDF and Unix. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think world-class. Think integrated. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be end-to-end? We will utilize the jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "subscriber-defined". We will expedite the term "long-term". Our technology takes the best features of Apache and OWL. Quick: do you have a customer-directed plan for monitoring unplanned-for robust relationships? SipsCo has revamped the theory of models. What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "virally-distributed, 60/60/24/7/365 reporting" really mean? We will utilize the term "reality-based". What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! If you actualize extensibly, you may have to enable robustly. A company that can morph fiercely will (at some unknown point of time) be able to aggregate elegantly. Think nano-best-of-breed. Without well-chosen subscriber communities, wireless social networks are forced to become revolutionary. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be short-term? If you reinvent robustly, you may have to evolve intuitively. We will step up our power to synergize without decrementing our capability to strategize. Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for innovating.