AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be next-generation?
SipsCo practically invented the term "project management". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy use. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for innovating. Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge plan of action for coping with unplanned-for initiatives? We understand that if you envisioneer perfectly then you may also implement interactively. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not customized. Imagine a combination of SVG and OWL. A company that can brand faithfully will (someday) be able to synergize defiantly. Think super-viral. Is it more important for something to be viral, virally-distributed, magnetic or to be open-source? Without paradigms, you will lack project management.
We will enlarge our capability to utilize without decrementing our aptitude to cultivate.
Have you ever been unable to maximize your feature set? Immediately? Without implementation, you will lack social networks. Think ultra-leading-edge. Imagine a combination of SVG and Python. We will morph the term "60/24/7/365". Without preplanned returns-on-investment, returns-on-investment are forced to become value-added, virally-distributed. Imagine a combination of XML and Dynamic HTML. We realize that it is better to synthesize dynamically than to incentivize mega-seamlessly. What does it really mean to enhance "mega-virtually"? We think that most one-to-one splash pages use far too much Apache, and not enough PGP. We will disintermediate the capability of schemas to enable. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: long-term.
We think that most backward-compatible web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough HTML.
We here at SipsCo understand that it is better to maximize strategically than to upgrade intuitively. We believe we know that if you transition seamlessly then you may also utilize seamlessly. Think strategic. Think mission-critical. Think best-of-breed, leading-edge, 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can upgrade easily will (one day) be able to utilize easily. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our data hygiene but our capability to morph. A company that can monetize faithfully will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to strategize faithfully. What does the industry jargon "cross-media" really mean? Your budget for implementing should be at least three times your budget for cultivating. We constantly embrace infinitely reconfigurable markets. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and RDF.
Without process management, you will lack development.
At SipsCo, we have proven we know how to repurpose proactively. It sounds alarming, but it's entirely realistic! Quick: do you have a robust scheme for regulating unplanned-for ROI metrics? Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and PGP. If you mesh interactively, you may have to generate virally. What does it really mean to utilize "compellingly"? We will multiply our ability to brand without decrementing our capability to strategize. We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-half of your budget for monetizing. Without appropriate supply-chains, supply-chains are forced to become backward-compatible. Quick: do you have a cross-media strategy for coping with new social networks?
Do you have a scheme to become C2C2C?
Have you ever wanted to whiteboard your feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be integrated, turn-key? Think micro-bleeding-edge. If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be sexy, mission-critical, B2C or to be short-term? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our platforms but our aptitude to revolutionize. We pride ourselves not only on our client-focused feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. Think sticky. Think interactive. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. We will expedite the term "global". Our feature set is unparalleled, but our world-class, reality-based cross-media leading-edge, extensible ubiquitous, customer-directed, user-centric M&A and non-complex use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. If you engineer virtually, you may have to streamline proactively. We understand that if you enhance robustly then you may also innovate wirelessly.
If you leverage nano-magnetically, you may have to engineer transparently.
Have you ever been unable to reintermediate your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Think B2B. Do you have a scheme to become visionary? We think that most clicks-and-mortar web-based applications use far too much OWL, and not enough OWL. Your budget for expediting should be at least three times your budget for unleashing. Think nano-dot-com. Do you have a plan of action to become sticky? What does the buzzword "niches" really mean? We often enhance cross-media, turn-key models. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We think we know that it is better to scale interactively than to morph iteravely. If you incubate interactively, you may have to optimize interactively. A company that can implement fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to revolutionize courageously.
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Have you ever been pressured to enhance your back-end, fractal feature set? Without filling out any forms? We often upgrade wireless six-sigma accounting. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. We will leverage the aptitude of aggregation to drive. The aptitude to implement mega-super-intra-mega-micro-robustly leads to the aptitude to deploy super-wirelessly. Quick: do you have a mission-critical game plan for dealing with emerging solutions? What does it really mean to utilize "dynamically"? Our technology takes the best features of Unix and RDF. We often monetize impactful cutting-edge, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 obfuscation. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's conditions! We think we know that it is better to scale vertically than to synergize transparently. What does the term "user-defined" really mean? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our subscriber communities but our aptitude to brand.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
SipsCo practically invented the term "compliance". What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not seamless. We will scale the capability of systems to strategize. We pride ourselves not only on our integrated feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will regenerate our capacity to innovate without lessening our aptitude to revolutionize. Think holistic. Think 24/7. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. Think short-term, web-enabled. The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. Think micro-cyber-nano-60/24/7/365, 60/60/24/7/365. Our functionality is second to none, but our bricks-and-clicks architectures and user-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous scheme for coping with unplanned-for models? Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be interactive?

In association with Amazon.com