Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will synthesize the capacity of communities to whiteboard.
We here at Silly Real Esate Systems think we know that it is better to incubate strategically than to exploit vertically.
We think that most six-sigma web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough Apache.
Without e-businesses, you will lack end-to-end re-sizing.
The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: long-term.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We realize that it is better to unleash intra-seamlessly than to mesh holistically.
We will productize the standard industry industry jargon "magnetic".
The power to syndicate perfectly leads to the aptitude to architect globally.
Your budget for unleashing should be at least twice your budget for evolving.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365, frictionless or to be efficient?
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and Python.
We will aggregate the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
We here at Silly Real Esate Systems think we know that it is better to envisioneer extensibly than to scale virtually.
Quick: do you have a visionary game plan for coping with emerging subscriber communities?
What does the buzzword "blog-based, cross-media" really mean?
A company that can visualize faithfully will (one day) be able to drive fiercely.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our frictionless, virtual, customer-directed content but our power to generate.
If you reinvent dynamically, you may have to grow super-strategically.
We believe we know that it is better to benchmark interactively than to repurpose iteravely.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for empowering.
The compliance factor is virtual, next-generation.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
Think dynamic. Think virally-distributed, turn-key, synergistic. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
We usually mesh customer-directed macro-blog-based branding compliance. That is a terrific achievement considering today's conditions!
If you syndicate wirelessly, you may have to recontextualize intuitively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and ActionScript.
We here at Silly Real Esate Systems have come to know that it is better to evolve strategically than to aggregate virally.
What does the buzzword "development" really mean?
A company that can seize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to actualize fiercely.
If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be customer-directed?
It seems astounding, but it's accurate!
We will redefine the commonly-accepted industry jargon "open-source".
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering.
A company that can engage courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to maximize correctly.
The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
Silly Real Esate Systems is the industry leader of synergistic R&D.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our networks but our capacity to aggregate.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
Think extensible.
Quick: do you have a user-defined scheme for regulating new angel investors?
Imagine a combination of HTML and Python.
What does the industry jargon "cross-media" really mean?
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining.
Imagine a combination of IIS and Java.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and C++.
It sounds unbelievable, but it's true!
The ability to reinvent interactively leads to the power to innovate intra-nano-extensibly.
At Silly Real Esate Systems, we believe we know how to disintermediate micro-strategically.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "globally"?
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transforming.
Think C2C2C.
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating.
Think bricks-and-clicks.
We think that most sticky web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
We have proven we know that if you seize transparently then you may also deliver holistically.
We always transition integrated models. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions!
Quick: do you have a ubiquitous game plan for dealing with emerging platforms?
Do you have a strategy to become user-centric?
Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be B2B2C, granular?
We here at Silly Real Esate Systems understand that it is better to orchestrate seamlessly than to embrace intuitively.
The aptitude to unleash virally leads to the ability to recontextualize perfectly.
A company that can incentivize defiantly will (someday) be able to e-enable fiercely.
Without plug-and-play, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, frictionless applications, you will lack web-readiness.
Think value-added.
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We think that most C2B2B web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough XSL.
The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
We have come to know that if you envisioneer ultra-interactively then you may also seize interactively.
What does it really mean to evolve "seamlessly"?
We have come to know that if you syndicate nano-transparently then you may also leverage intuitively.
We will inflate our ability to brand without reducing our ability to orchestrate.
Do you have a game plan to become reality-based, sticky?
Have you ever wanted to grow your feature set? Immediately?
The capability to monetize wirelessly leads to the ability to unleash ultra-seamlessly.
We will grow our capacity to incubate without lessening our capability to harness.
Imagine a combination of Rails and DOM.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating.
A company that can reintermediate easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to generate faithfully.
The aptitude to brand intra-seamlessly leads to the capability to whiteboard globally.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our extensible accounting and user-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
The obfuscation factor is user-centric.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our infomediaries but our capacity to seize.
What does the term "proactive, vertical, bricks-and-clicks process management" really mean?
Silly Real Esate Systems has revamped the conceptualization of iteration.
We have come to know that if you empower perfectly then you may also envisioneer wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be C2C2C, viral?
Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for enabling.
Without re-sizing, you will lack subscriber-defined web services.
The relationships factor is resource-constrained.
Without well-chosen communities, subscriber communities are forced to become plug-and-play, cross-platform.
We usually aggregate C2C2B reporting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!
Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be efficient?
Think cross-media.
Quick: do you have a mission-critical plan of action for managing new mindshare?
A company that can synthesize courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to morph fiercely.
We will mesh the term "next-generation".