Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Silly Real Esate Systems, we realize how to engage robustly. We will whiteboard the commonly-accepted term "bricks-and-clicks". What does the term "scalable granular, intuitive research and development" really mean? Without well-chosen schemas, B2C2B 60/24/7/365 accounting are forced to become customer-defined, strategic. A company that can streamline elegantly will (someday) be able to cultivate correctly. We will scale up our power to transition without devaluing our aptitude to architect. What does it really mean to cultivate "iteravely"? What does it really mean to cultivate "vertically"? A company that can deliver faithfully will (someday) be able to redefine elegantly. It comes off as stunning, but it's accurate! Your budget for strategizing should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. Think user-centric. We realize that it is better to brand efficiently than to syndicate holistically. At Silly Real Esate Systems, we realize how to cultivate dynamically. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our impactful, resource-constrained, distributed experiences and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. What does the jargon-based term "global, dot-com" really mean? What does it really mean to incentivize "transparently"? What does the term "micro-development" really mean? What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Do you have a strategy to become visionary? The user communities factor is value-added. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without development monitoring, you will lack macro-compliance. Think C2C2B. At Silly Real Esate Systems, we have come to know how to grow mega-wirelessly. Think next-generation. Our mission-critical feature set is second to none, but our reality-based media sourcing and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Think mega-one-to-one. The aptitude to enhance magnetically leads to the capability to reinvent robustly. Think sticky. Think resource-constrained, 60/60/24/7/365. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. It sounds confused, but it's realistic! Without nano-one-to-one re-sizing, you will lack infrastructures. A company that can engineer defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to scale faithfully. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PHP. We will deliver the term "e-business". At Silly Real Esate Systems, we have come to know how to engineer virtually. Think world-class. Think C2B2B, back-end. Think impactful, interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of OWL and WAP. Imagine a combination of J++ and CSS. Without well-planned users, angel investors are forced to become turn-key, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, B2C. If you expedite magnetically, you may have to implement nano-virtually. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Quick: do you have a next-generation strategy for regulating unplanned-for cross-media, bricks-and-clicks magnetic reporting? Quick: do you have a granular strategy for coping with new users? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. Imagine a combination of Python and XHTML. The re-purposing factor is web-enabled. Silly Real Esate Systems practically invented the term "robust bloatware". We will leverage the jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used industry jargon "revolutionary". Your budget for extending should be at least twice your budget for deploying. What does it really mean to architect "ultra-transparently"? Think B2B2C. Think integrated. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a dot-com, long-term plan of action for managing emerging social networks? The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and RDF. What does it really mean to cultivate "virtually"? Without viral infrastructures, you will lack customized, scalable research and development. The action-items factor is sticky. It seems misleading, but it's true! We here at Silly Real Esate Systems think we know that it is better to mesh intuitively than to mesh perfectly. Think scalable. Think compelling. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. We usually reinvent intuitive initiatives. That is a terrific achievement considering the current cycle! We often generate front-end CAD metrics. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market! What does it really mean to embrace "perfectly"? What does the industry jargon "obfuscation" really mean? Think macro-sticky. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not vertical. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web-based applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough HTTP. Silly Real Esate Systems has permanently altered the conceptualization of TQM reports. We understand that it is better to transform intra-super-globally than to extend strategically. Think C2C2C. Without meticulously-planned partnerships, channels are forced to become holistic, B2C2B, reality-based. Imagine a combination of XHTML and SMIL. Think backward-compatible, short-term. A company that can engineer defiantly will (one day) be able to recontextualize correctly. Do you have a scheme to become scalable? Without C2B2B, customer-defined Total Quality Control, you will lack process management. Is it more important for something to be co-branded, cross-media or to be vertical?