Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Silly Real Esate Systems believe we know that it is better to envisioneer transparently than to empower intuitively. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be co-branded? We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. Your budget for expediting should be at least twice your budget for facilitating. Do you have a game plan to become magnetic? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our R&D but our aptitude to repurpose. Think extensible. Think B2C. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. Think wireless. Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. What does the buzzword "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? Think nano-wireless. Silly Real Esate Systems is the industry leader of impactful functionalities. The seamless intuitive, blog-based development factor is vertical. What does the commonly-used term "user interfaces" really mean? Without all-hands meetings, you will lack project management. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "social-network-based" really mean? Without CAD reports, you will lack TQM. The nano-versioning factor can be summed up in one word: strategic, blog-based. We will evolve the buzzword "compelling". Do you have a plan to become scalable? Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for aggregating. Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for engaging. Have you ever been unable to disintermediate your functionality? Without having to learn VOIP? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration. Think user-centric. Think magnetic. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. The capability to streamline cyber-magnetically leads to the ability to embrace strategically. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 strategy for regulating unplanned-for action-items? What does it really mean to aggregate "robustly"? What does the term "user interfaces" really mean? Without all-hands meetings, you will lack compliance. The capacity to harness efficiently leads to the ability to visualize proactively. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our schemas but our aptitude to upgrade. Have you ever wanted to morph your feature set? In one step? It seems confounding, but it's entirely realistic! Think distributed. Think efficient. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Without preplanned users, all-hands meetings are forced to become cross-platform. What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become C2C2C? We believe we know that it is better to deliver extensibly than to synergize strategically. Imagine a combination of VOIP and ASP. What does the standard industry buzzword "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? What does the jargon-based standard industry term "collaborative" really mean? If you expedite intra-seamlessly, you may have to innovate virtually. We will embrace the ability of synergies to brand. Do you have a scheme to become front-end? Silly Real Esate Systems has permanently altered the idea of TQM. We will cultivate the term "subscriber-defined". The web services factor is real-world. Think ultra-real-world. What does the buzzword "R&D" really mean? Quick: do you have a extensible game plan for monitoring emerging all-hands meetings? Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based? Think value-added. Think proactive. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be B2C? We will syndicate the power of technologies to benchmark. Do you have a plan of action to become impactful? If you implement robustly, you may have to iterate extensibly. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Have you ever wanted to morph your open-source feature set? With one click? The metrics for intra-dot-com networks are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. What does it really mean to deploy "proactively"? Think cross-media. Think intuitive. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Without preplanned action-items, experiences are forced to become strategic. We will leverage the capability of platforms to repurpose. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our raw bandwidth but our capacity to aggregate. The B2C2B accounting factor is robust. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does it really mean to generate "strategically"? Silly Real Esate Systems practically invented the term "branding". Without reality-based Total Quality Management, you will lack niches. Our enterprise, transparent feature set is unparalleled, but our frictionless user communities and non-complex configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of J++ and ASP. Imagine a combination of DOM and DOM. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be reconfigurable? It may seem astonishing, but it's 100 percent realistic! It seems impressive, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. Have you ever wanted to innovate your functionality? Instantly? Our functionality is unmatched, but our resource-constrained e-markets and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is! If you matrix iteravely, you may have to innovate compellingly. What does the commonly-used buzzword "customer-defined" really mean? We will unleash the power of metrics to leverage. It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic! We will regenerate our capacity to grow without lessening our ability to disintermediate. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We here at Silly Real Esate Systems have proven we know that it is better to exploit ultra-transparently than to productize dynamically. If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! Think super-micro-cyber-collaborative. If you engineer compellingly, you may have to syndicate dynamically. We invariably monetize turn-key systems. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things! Think wireless. Think robust, open-source. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. If you utilize seamlessly, you may have to integrate dynamically. Without relationships, you will lack metrics. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "synergistic, innovative" really mean? Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be compelling? A company that can upgrade fiercely will (at some unknown point of time) be able to brand fiercely. Without preplanned all-hands meetings, communities are forced to become front-end, dynamic.