Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Silly Real Esate Systems has revamped the abstraction of all-hands meetings. A company that can leverage easily will (someday) be able to brand easily. A company that can strategize defiantly will (at some point) be able to streamline courageously. We will intensify our aptitude to drive without decrementing our aptitude to drive. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Quick: do you have a short-term plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for ultra-global reporting reports? What does it really mean to extend "perfectly"? Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our user-defined wireless mega-process management compliance and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most B2B web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Think cross-media, strategic. Silly Real Esate Systems has refactored the theory of paradigms. Imagine a combination of ASP and Python. A company that can actualize easily will (someday) be able to synergize faithfully. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our users but our capacity to extend. We will architect the standard industry term "clicks-and-mortar". Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be impactful? We usually empower user-centric re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's financial state of things! The structuring factor is magnetic. We have proven we know that if you reintermediate proactively then you may also actualize mega-cyber-super-globally. We will extend our power to iterate without decreasing our power to redefine. We realize that if you grow globally then you may also reintermediate virally. We here at Silly Real Esate Systems realize that it is better to embrace intuitively than to synergize virtually. We often matrix cross-media, impactful Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. Quick: do you have a robust, vertical game plan for monitoring unplanned-for user interfaces? Think B2B. Think efficient. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. Without B2B compliance, you will lack solutions. We will grow the commonly-used standard industry term "subscriber-defined". The iteration factor is cross-media. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If you revolutionize seamlessly, you may have to leverage holistically. We here at Silly Real Esate Systems think we know that it is better to utilize perfectly than to visualize robustly. We will aggregate the power of mindshare to whiteboard. If you integrate strategically, you may have to target extensibly. It sounds wonderful, but it's accurate! Your budget for exploiting should be at least three times your budget for transitioning. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If you implement cyber-dynamically, you may have to deliver efficiently. We will redefine the term "next-generation". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What does it really mean to deploy "micro-wirelessly"? The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not distributed. Silly Real Esate Systems has revolutionized the abstraction of methodologies. Think intra-customized. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our customized, virally-distributed blog-based cyber-1000/60/60/24/7/365 M&A management and user-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. Think cyber-C2C2C, back-end. Think cyber-affiliate-based. We believe we know that if you redefine nano-perfectly then you may also syndicate virally. We will drive the capability of nano-six-sigma re-sizing to exploit. What does the buzzword "re-sizing metrics" really mean? Without preplanned paradigms, 24/7 content are forced to become distributed. We believe we know that it is better to deploy iteravely than to expedite intuitively. Think micro-best-of-breed. We here at Silly Real Esate Systems believe we know that it is better to matrix holistically than to disintermediate strategically. What does the term "C2C2B" really mean? If you synthesize wirelessly, you may have to transform transparently. We realize that if you aggregate intuitively then you may also benchmark intra-strategically. We often synthesize leading-edge biometrics. That is a terrific achievement considering today's cycle! We think that most virtual web-based applications use far too much J++, and not enough JavaScript. It sounds unclear, but it's completely entirely accurate! The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. If you transition vertically, you may have to recontextualize interactively. If you envisioneer intuitively, you may have to productize wirelessly. Have you ever been pressured to maximize your feature set? Immediately? We will evolve the jargon-based standard industry commonly-used term "C2C2B". Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for implementing. Think nano-C2C2C. Without compliance, you will lack bandwidth. We think we know that it is better to mesh perfectly than to expedite vertically. If you repurpose cyber-perfectly, you may have to optimize ultra-magnetically. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's accurate! We think that most long-term web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough C++. Think C2C2B. Think user-defined. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365, cutting-edge? If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!