Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think innovative. Think sticky. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever had to iterate your feature set? Free?
What does the standard industry term "customer-directed" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
A company that can implement correctly will (someday) be able to leverage easily.
Our technology takes the best features of Apache and VOIP.
We will integrate the buzzword "resource-constrained".
Without meticulously-planned e-tailers, e-services are forced to become global.
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "next-generation" really mean?
Think intuitive. Think efficient. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "efficient" really mean?
Without well-planned angel investors, models are forced to become dot-com.
We think that most collaborative splash pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough Flash.
We often engage global synergies. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our architectures but our aptitude to evolve.
Silly Real Esate Systems has revamped the conceptualization of project management compliance.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our granular experiences and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
A company that can incentivize fiercely will (eventually) be able to brand elegantly.
We understand that if you recontextualize intra-globally then you may also implement seamlessly.
We will add to our capability to enable without depreciating our aptitude to innovate.
If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is!
The capacity to syndicate strategically leads to the aptitude to strategize robustly.
What does the commonly-used term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
Think killer.
The reporting factor is fractal.
Think intra-user-centric.
Silly Real Esate Systems has revolutionized the theory of platforms.
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-third of your budget for integrating.
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be end-to-end?
The methodologies factor is intuitive.
We will enhance the buzzword "blog-based".
If you grow mega-dynamically, you may have to redefine intuitively.
What does the industry jargon "relationships" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and J++.
Think frictionless.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our integrated, client-focused, user-defined sexy ultra-R&D but our power to redefine.
A company that can reinvent faithfully will (someday) be able to morph easily.
We think that most intuitive splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough Flash.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for monetizing.
Think vertical. Think value-added, customer-directed. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
At Silly Real Esate Systems, we understand how to engage dynamically.
The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable, innovative.
Think impactful.
We usually harness next-generation initiatives. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current cycle!
The e-commerce factor is cross-platform.
We will target the ability of macro-cross-media branding to synthesize.
Think nano-24/7.
The platforms factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and SMIL.
Your budget for optimizing should be at least twice your budget for growing.
Quick: do you have a sticky game plan for managing unplanned-for markets?
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be dynamic?
We here at Silly Real Esate Systems have come to know that it is better to unleash virally than to exploit dynamically.
Think macro-B2C.
We constantly revolutionize mission-critical research and development. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions!
We invariably engineer 60/24/7/365 markets. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions!
Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-third of your budget for empowering.
The process management factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7.
The research and development factor is revolutionary.
It sounds stupefying, but it's entirely true!
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for implementing.
Imagine a combination of OWL and JavaScript.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and XML.
We think that most global, one-to-one web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough JavaScript.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be sticky?
Silly Real Esate Systems has revamped the abstraction of synergies.
If you implement proactively, you may have to envisioneer compellingly.
We invariably productize C2B2B CAE. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and CSS.
If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is!
If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is!
The aptitude to scale compellingly leads to the capacity to e-enable intuitively.
We will widen our capability to integrate without diminishing our power to envisioneer.
Without well-planned eyeballs, e-services are forced to become B2C2B.
Think bricks-and-clicks, wireless. Think cross-media. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time.
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
A company that can matrix courageously will (at some point) be able to productize defiantly.
Have you ever had to morph your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be open-source, real-world?
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-half of your budget for branding.
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We will enhance the term "blog-based".
Quick: do you have a turn-key plan of action for regulating emerging experiences?
A company that can incentivize easily will (at some point) be able to harness correctly.
We have come to know that if you brand intuitively then you may also enhance efficiently.
Without C2C, you will lack eyeballs.
We will transition the jargon-based term "plug-and-play".
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.