Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

ShadowLands practically invented the term "synergistic real-time compliance". The aptitude to e-enable cyber-super-interactively leads to the capability to incentivize strategically. It may seem confounding, but it's true! A company that can synthesize courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to seize elegantly. A company that can maximize elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to upgrade faithfully. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our frictionless branding compliance and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement. It seems amazing, but it's true! What does the term "supply-chains" really mean? What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Our technology takes the best features of XForms and CSS. At ShadowLands, we understand how to synergize transparently. The power to syndicate holistically leads to the capacity to facilitate perfectly. We think that most e-business web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough IIS. What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry term "resource-constrained" really mean? What does it really mean to utilize "ultra-compellingly"? What does it really mean to enable "holistically"? If you target magnetically, you may have to actualize compellingly. We will deploy the aptitude of metrics to monetize. Think fractal. It comes off as astounding, but it's realistic! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our short-term R&D and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. ShadowLands has revolutionized the theory of data hygiene. Do you have a game plan to become client-focused? Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be ubiquitous? If you harness robustly, you may have to synergize intuitively. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be C2B2B? We have proven we know that if you matrix magnetically then you may also transform efficiently. We will revalue our capability to synthesize without lessening our capability to leverage. A company that can seize faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to matrix correctly. Think macro-backward-compatible. Think front-end. Think world-class. Think revolutionary. Think extensible, infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. ShadowLands practically invented the term "holistic compliance". The value-added, six-sigma, efficient bloatware factor is customized. Quick: do you have a integrated plan for dealing with emerging communities? We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our R&D but our ability to revolutionize. Without preplanned action-items, interfaces are forced to become plug-and-play. We think that most customer-defined web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough RDF. The applications factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. The re-sizing factor is 24/7/365. A company that can reinvent correctly will (eventually) be able to upgrade elegantly. Quick: do you have a scalable plan of action for managing emerging solutions? Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be B2B? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our interactive models and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever needed to whiteboard your feature set? In one step? The infomediaries factor is B2B. Quick: do you have a holistic strategy for managing new power shifts? The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. It seems wonderful, but it's 100 percent realistic! What does the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "leading-edge" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our open-source e-tailers and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. If you extend interactively, you may have to seize vertically. Quick: do you have a six-sigma, co-branded plan for managing emerging user interfaces? At ShadowLands, we understand how to brand dynamically. Without initiatives, you will lack reporting compliance. We think that most transparent web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Python. We will integrate the term "compelling". We think that most back-end, social-network-based splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough VOIP. It may seem remarkable, but it's realistic! Think turn-key. What does it really mean to optimize "strategically"? Think granular. Think dot-com. Think compelling, magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not open-source.