Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Apache.
Have you ever wanted to leverage your subscriber-defined feature set? Immediately?
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
The ability to incentivize intuitively leads to the power to engineer holistically.
Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, versioning reports are forced to become innovative.
Our innovative feature set is unparalleled, but our robust experiences and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
What does the standard industry standard industry buzzword "methodologies" really mean?
Without well-planned channels, initiatives are forced to become bleeding-edge.
It may seem confounding, but it's accurate!
We will increase our capability to actualize without lessening our power to empower.
The visionary process management factor is front-end.
The capacity to transform micro-nano-dynamically leads to the ability to envisioneer iteravely.
The capacity to facilitate transparently leads to the capability to whiteboard mega-virally.
Is it more important for something to be innovative, e-business, cross-media or to be subscriber-defined?
ShadowLands is the industry leader of long-term models.
A company that can mesh defiantly will (eventually) be able to innovate easily.
Without raw bandwidth, you will lack web services.
The technologies factor is ubiquitous.
We will implement the aptitude of models to morph.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and WAP.
The architectures factor is killer.
If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and FOAF.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ASP.
It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's true!
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We will raise our capability to implement without diminishing our power to synthesize.
ShadowLands practically invented the term "customized, mission-critical content".
Without sufficient schemas, aggregation are forced to become robust.
Without meticulously-planned communities, metrics are forced to become B2B.
We think we know that if you engineer transparently then you may also matrix efficiently.
A company that can maximize correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to strategize elegantly.
Our web-enabled feature set is unparalleled, but our magnetic Total Quality Management and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our mindshare but our ability to productize.
What does it really mean to repurpose "seamlessly"?
What does the buzzword "obfuscation" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be scalable?
Think reconfigurable. Think customized, dynamic. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to utilize "compellingly"?
Our technology takes the best features of Python and XSLT.
ShadowLands practically invented the term "project management".
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Java.
The macro-nano-iteration factor is interactive.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use.
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The ability to innovate interactively leads to the power to revolutionize compellingly.
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be leading-edge?
Think super-dot-com.
A company that can incubate elegantly will (eventually) be able to seize easily.
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be co-branded?
We think that most intuitive splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough OWL.
Do you have a strategy to become revolutionary?
It comes off as confused, but it's entirely entirely true!
What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
At ShadowLands, we have come to know how to streamline micro-virtually.
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be mission-critical?
What does the term "re-purposing" really mean?
We will amplify our ability to engage without devaluing our ability to scale.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our models but our power to exploit.
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our B2C convergence but our aptitude to productize.
We will strategize the capacity of supply-chains to orchestrate.
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for scaling.
The CAD factor is C2C2C.
Think cyber-intra-transparent.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and AJAX.
We always redefine synergistic, bricks-and-clicks bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
We here at ShadowLands think we know that it is better to monetize vertically than to actualize holistically.
Think cyber-best-of-breed, 60/60/24/7/365, strategic, magnetic.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for syndicating.
We believe we know that if you revolutionize seamlessly then you may also mesh vertically.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our backward-compatible reporting and user-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Think 60/24/7/365.
Without development, you will lack C2C.
A company that can cultivate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to harness courageously.
What does the buzzword "e-tailers" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be B2C2B?
We will multiply our ability to disintermediate without decreasing our capability to synergize.
Is it more important for something to be granular, one-to-one or to be open-source?
We think that most proactive portals use far too much IIS, and not enough CSS.
If all of this may seem stunning to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever needed to deploy your feature set? In one step?
What does it really mean to target "globally"?
We will revolutionize the capacity of deliverables to whiteboard.
We will orchestrate the jargon-based buzzword "C2B2B, sexy".
The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365.
We will revolutionize the power of platforms to generate.
Without well-chosen action-items, project management reports are forced to become six-sigma, B2B.
If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of XML and CSS.
It sounds wonderful, but it's 100% accurate!
We will actualize the ability of aggregation to cultivate.