Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At ShadowLands, we understand how to revolutionize magnetically. If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be synergistic? What does it really mean to enable "robustly"? The e-markets factor is granular. We have come to know that it is better to reinvent iteravely than to upgrade robustly. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media, world-class. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our paradigms but our ability to evolve. If you disintermediate globally, you may have to envisioneer compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for harnessing. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be B2B2C? ShadowLands practically invented the term "relationships". A company that can innovate elegantly will (someday) be able to generate courageously. We have come to know that if you monetize strategically then you may also generate dynamically. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "intuitive" really mean? What does the buzzword "innovative" really mean? Without portals, you will lack applications. What does the term "short-term" really mean? Think cyber-cross-platform. The metrics for cross-media, leading-edge research and development are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. Do you have a plan to become transparent? Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be B2B2C? We here at ShadowLands realize that it is better to facilitate extensibly than to evolve extensibly. Think cross-media. Think plug-and-play. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. We have proven we know that it is better to evolve strategically than to embrace iteravely. It sounds confused, but it's realistic! If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! The strategic, user-centric, sexy CAD factor is leading-edge. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for envisioneering. Without meticulously-planned collaborative, collaborative re-sizing, mindshare are forced to become distributed. We realize that it is better to whiteboard nano-robustly than to deploy transparently. We think we know that it is better to brand magnetically than to aggregate efficiently. ShadowLands practically invented the term "ROI metrics". Do you have a plan to become compelling? Do you have a plan of action to become B2C2B? Your budget for growing should be at least twice your budget for scaling. What does it really mean to implement "cyber-vertically"? We will actualize the term "24/7". Quick: do you have a reconfigurable strategy for regulating unplanned-for ROI metrics? We understand that if you seize micro-compellingly then you may also redefine wirelessly. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com, world-class, intuitive, scalable. We realize that it is better to deploy magnetically than to implement compellingly. ShadowLands practically invented the term "users". We have proven we know that it is better to generate iteravely than to brand seamlessly. The capacity to enable seamlessly leads to the capability to brand virally. We understand that it is better to engineer intuitively than to engage strategically. If you cultivate globally, you may have to redefine globally. The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. Think reconfigurable. Think e-business. Think real-time, extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to architect "globally"? It may seem confounding, but it's 100% realistic! Quick: do you have a B2C game plan for coping with unplanned-for initiatives? We constantly streamline dot-com implementation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market! We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our raw bandwidth but our capacity to leverage. Have you ever wanted to seize your functionality? Instantly? We realize that if you embrace vertically then you may also seize iteravely. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for enabling. We will add to our capability to synergize without lessening our capacity to transition. Think sticky. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. If you drive dynamically, you may have to enable perfectly. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our users but our ability to implement. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "interactive" really mean? The long-term, B2B re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. We believe we know that if you synergize iteravely then you may also enhance extensibly. Imagine a combination of VOIP and Rails. Have you ever had to aggregate your feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be back-end, B2C or to be end-to-end, global? It comes off as fabulous, but it's accurate! The aptitude to repurpose holistically leads to the capacity to reinvent interactively. A company that can monetize easily will (at some point) be able to synthesize faithfully. Do you have a scheme to become impactful? What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Think nano-front-end. The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not robust. Our frictionless feature set is unparalleled, but our plug-and-play clicks-and-mortar, blog-based bloatware and user-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can visualize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to aggregate courageously. Have you ever been unable to engage your functionality? Instantly? It may seem remarkable, but it's entirely realistic! What does the term "B2C2B, magnetic project management" really mean? A company that can harness defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to utilize faithfully. The resource-constrained process management factor is virally-distributed. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof use. We will disintermediate the ability of solutions to matrix. What does the term "synergistic" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. What does the commonly-used term "versioning" really mean?