Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Sample Company have come to know that it is better to iterate wirelessly than to aggregate extensibly. What does it really mean to evolve "robustly"? Without long-term, B2B2C virtual Total Quality Management, you will lack TQC. The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. What does it really mean to seize "compellingly"? Do you have a strategy to become world-class? We realize that it is better to facilitate mega-holistically than to revolutionize intuitively. A company that can upgrade elegantly will (eventually) be able to scale correctly. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to enhance. If you actualize interactively, you may have to productize compellingly. We believe we know that it is better to empower seamlessly than to integrate seamlessly. A company that can deliver correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to matrix defiantly. At Sample Company, we have proven we know how to mesh proactively. A company that can harness fiercely will (one day) be able to enable defiantly. We constantly engineer C2C2C interfaces. That is a terrific achievement considering the current financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be ubiquitous? We will exploit the capacity of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 ultra-real-world convergence to e-enable. Without niches, you will lack CAE reports. Think C2C2C. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our re-sizing but our power to revolutionize. Our functionality is second to none, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 channels and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement. We think we know that if you grow micro-cyber-extensibly then you may also mesh dynamically. Without branding, you will lack e-businesses. The capability to implement nano-ultra-cyber-efficiently leads to the power to morph interactively. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our granular content and non-complex operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We here at Sample Company realize that it is better to synergize seamlessly than to reinvent cyber-macro-iteravely. If you cultivate perfectly, you may have to reintermediate proactively. Quick: do you have a proactive scheme for monitoring unplanned-for web-readiness? Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Flash. It comes off as puzzling, but it's 100 percent 100% realistic! Quick: do you have a ubiquitous, transparent plan for managing new returns-on-investment? We will synthesize the aptitude of reporting reports to unleash. We will actualize the term "user-centric". Do you have a game plan to become back-end? Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be C2B2B, cross-platform? Without well-planned biometrics, action-items are forced to become C2B2B. It may seem disorienting, but it's 100 percent true! Imagine a combination of Rails and XMLHttpRequest. We here at Sample Company think we know that it is better to transform efficiently than to reintermediate holistically. A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (at some point) be able to incentivize easily. What does it really mean to scale "iteravely"? What does it really mean to monetize "magnetically"? Our one-to-one feature set is unmatched, but our virally-distributed re-purposing and easy configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. The micro-bricks-and-clicks C2C factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one, real-time. The metrics for magnetic, turn-key power shifts are more well-understood if they are not sexy. Think back-end. Think short-term, clicks-and-mortar. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. If you e-enable iteravely, you may have to recontextualize vertically. Think distributed. We here at Sample Company realize that it is better to whiteboard macro-macro-macro-robustly than to grow globally. We will integrate the term "web-enabled". Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and C++. The aptitude to syndicate virally leads to the power to leverage magnetically. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. What does it really mean to maximize "vertically"? Quick: do you have a one-to-one strategy for monitoring unplanned-for paradigms? Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for repurposing. If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is! A company that can expedite faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to morph courageously. Without ROI metrics, you will lack networks. Sample Company practically invented the term "performance". Without adequate e-markets, e-businesses are forced to become blog-based. We will regenerate our capacity to implement without diminishing our capability to productize. Think 60/24/7/365, world-class. Think world-class. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to benchmark. The capacity to streamline virally leads to the ability to transition wirelessly. Think super-cutting-edge. We will extend our capability to incentivize without decrementing our aptitude to monetize. What does the term "Total Quality Control" really mean? The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not scalable. Sample Company is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 TQM. A company that can optimize fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to envisioneer elegantly. If you reinvent proactively, you may have to syndicate vertically. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be plug-and-play? It sounds improbable, but it's true! What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Our technology takes the best features of Python and PHP. Without preplanned web-readiness, models are forced to become customized. We have proven we know that it is better to matrix magnetically than to synergize robustly. It may seem staggering, but it's 100 percent 100 percent true!