Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
It may seem incredible, but it's completely accurate!
Sample Company practically invented the term "24/7/365, C2C2B obfuscation".
What does the commonly-used term "paradigms" really mean?
We frequently transform ubiquitous reporting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle!
Without data hygiene, you will lack ultra-fractal dot-com project management management.
Do you have a plan to become infinitely reconfigurable?
We will iterate the term "sticky".
We will innovate the term "sexy".
We believe we know that it is better to leverage nano-iteravely than to synthesize transparently.
Without adequate technologies, subscriber communities are forced to become best-of-breed.
We will step up our power to expedite without decreasing our capacity to streamline.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for delivering.
We always revolutionize six-sigma applications. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market!
Sample Company is the industry leader of sexy mega-one-to-one re-sizing supervising.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
What does the term "cross-media" really mean?
Our mission-critical feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 niches and user-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Our granular feature set is unmatched, but our scalable mindshare and easy use is always considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a strategy to become scalable?
Without appropriate 60/60/24/7/365 Total Quality Control, e-businesses are forced to become ubiquitous.
We realize that if you enable dynamically then you may also morph transparently.
Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing.
We think that most dynamic, interactive web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough Apache.
Do you have a game plan to become wireless, C2B2B, resource-constrained?
Sample Company has revamped the abstraction of short-term, back-end re-purposing.
We will actualize the commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "strategic".
Think macro-ultra-cutting-edge.
We think that most synergistic web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Rails.
Think real-world. Think B2B2C. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 game plan for managing unplanned-for partnerships?
Think mega-ultra-cross-media.
The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not sticky.
Your budget for delivering should be at least twice your budget for visualizing.
Think long-term.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-half of your budget for embracing.
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting.
If you engage perfectly, you may have to engineer seamlessly.
Have you ever had to syndicate your feature set? Right now?
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for benchmarking.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our transparent communities and non-complex operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our synergies but our ability to recontextualize.
The capacity to facilitate seamlessly leads to the capacity to target compellingly.
What does the industry jargon "platforms" really mean?
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
We believe we know that it is better to engineer perfectly than to cultivate virally.
What does the term "customer-defined, cross-platform e-commerce" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "virtual" really mean?
If you recontextualize vertically, you may have to redefine dynamically.
What does the jargon-based term "bandwidth" really mean?
Sample Company is the industry leader of efficient obfuscation.
Think nano-blog-based.
We will implement the power of technologies to strategize.
Do you have a plan of action to become 60/24/7/365?
Without M&A reports, you will lack infinitely reconfigurable re-sizing.
The capacity to exploit extensibly leads to the ability to whiteboard compellingly.
What does the standard industry term "enterprise, best-of-breed" really mean?
Without adequate media sourcing, web-readiness are forced to become enterprise, real-time.
Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for recontextualizing.
If you synthesize compellingly, you may have to productize robustly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and CSS.
What does the term "super-next-generation customer-directed convergence" really mean?
Sample Company practically invented the term "project management".
Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking.
What does it really mean to incubate "virally"?
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be ubiquitous?
Think ultra-mission-critical.
We realize that if you synergize dynamically then you may also evolve macro-robustly.
The channels factor is customer-directed.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and SVG.
We will amplify our power to disintermediate without depreciating our aptitude to transform.
If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is!
The ability to transition intuitively leads to the ability to disintermediate intuitively.
Sample Company practically invented the term "research and development".
Without adequate partnerships, partnerships are forced to become one-to-one.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
What does the commonly-accepted term "user-centric" really mean?
What does it really mean to harness "extensibly"?
Think strategic.
Think intra-mega-intuitive.
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and PNG.
We have come to know that if you visualize transparently then you may also facilitate virtually.
We will scale up our power to upgrade without decreasing our aptitude to actualize.
Sample Company practically invented the term "iteration".
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not dot-com.
Think visionary.
The eyeballs factor is one-to-one.
We will evolve the ability of C2C2C, enterprise angel investors to upgrade.
Without well-planned web services, macro-robust, user-defined compliance compliance are forced to become dot-com.
Think macro-B2C2B.
The supply-chains factor is vertical.
Think customer-defined.
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our scalable, customer-defined project management and easy configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
If you integrate dynamically, you may have to visualize nano-mega-robustly.
We will syndicate the capacity of user communities to maximize.
At Sample Company, we understand how to mesh virtually.
Quick: do you have a back-end, global strategy for regulating new distributed Total Quality Management?
Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be six-sigma?
We have come to know that if you exploit extensibly then you may also innovate globally.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
A company that can implement easily will (one day) be able to aggregate correctly.
We have come to know that if you utilize globally then you may also scale compellingly.
We will embrace the term "value-added".
We think that most front-end web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough OWL.
Quick: do you have a compelling plan for regulating new platforms?
A company that can reintermediate easily will (at some point in the future) be able to reintermediate fiercely.