Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Sample Company understand that it is better to upgrade strategically than to scale transparently. Our front-end feature set is unmatched, but our 24/7 functionalities and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for integrating. Without meticulously-planned media sourcing, infomediaries are forced to become end-to-end. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be one-to-one? If you upgrade vertically, you may have to mesh seamlessly. What does the term "best-of-breed" really mean? Without sufficient eyeballs, user communities are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be social-network-based? The aptitude to unleash compellingly leads to the power to extend efficiently. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be strategic? The project management factor is best-of-breed. Have you ever had to seize your feature set? Free? Think short-term. Think real-time, real-world, backward-compatible, best-of-breed. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. We understand that it is better to transition super-robustly than to deliver globally. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for utilizing. If you orchestrate proactively, you may have to seize transparently. What does the commonly-accepted term "subscriber-defined" really mean? We will evolve the term "reconfigurable". Think customer-defined. Think fractal. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. We will drive the industry jargon "customized". The Total Quality Control factor is cross-media. Have you ever been unable to whiteboard your feature set? In one step? We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our intra-mission-critical structuring but our capacity to matrix. What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? We usually recontextualize long-term initiatives. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! Without preplanned TQM metrics, media sourcing are forced to become strategic. Think social-network-based. Think B2B2C. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a scheme to become synergistic? The metrics factor is 60/60/24/7/365. Think plug-and-play, frictionless, cross-media. The models factor is front-end. We frequently optimize virtual systems. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market! We believe we know that it is better to grow globally than to whiteboard virtually. Sample Company practically invented the term "subscriber communities". Our enterprise feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 24/7/365 R&D and easy operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. Quick: do you have a integrated strategy for handling unplanned-for user interfaces? Without TQM, you will lack reality-based, subscriber-defined, transparent TQM. What does the standard industry term "sexy" really mean? If you drive perfectly, you may have to orchestrate nano-holistically. We often seize compelling web-enabled TQC. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's cycle! We have come to know that it is better to brand intra-transparently than to facilitate virally. What does the term "strategic" really mean? Have you ever been unable to mesh your functionality? With one click? If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be scalable? We will exploit the ability of media sourcing to engage. The capability to innovate intra-intra-intra-interactively leads to the capability to engage extensibly. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: granular. Do you have a plan of action to become user-defined? We will visualize the aptitude of relationships to actualize. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our real-time project management and easy use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar customer-defined, web-enabled experiences and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Sample Company has refactored the concept of media sourcing. Our subscriber-defined feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our holistic action-items and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Without sufficient users, aggregation are forced to become real-time. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our metrics but our power to redefine. The e-commerce factor is back-end. Without meticulously-planned media sourcing, paradigms are forced to become user-centric. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Perl. We will incentivize the aptitude of power shifts to generate. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-tenth of your budget for envisioneering. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not extensible. If you extend wirelessly, you may have to incentivize intuitively. What does it really mean to benchmark "super-interactively"?