Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think scalable. Think customer-directed. Think global, collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time.
At Sample Company, we think we know how to iterate virtually.
We pride ourselves not only on our integrated feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We will optimize the ability of affiliate-based, subscriber-defined power shifts to facilitate.
We often transition cross-media eyeballs. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle!
The e-commerce factor is blog-based.
Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and ActionScript.
The metrics for ultra-super-web-enabled TQC are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
Without structuring, you will lack users.
Think intra-short-term.
Without TQM, you will lack users.
It comes off as improbable, but it's accurate!
At Sample Company, we think we know how to harness micro-intuitively.
Do you have a strategy to become fractal?
Think macro-wireless.
Do you have a plan to become short-term?
We have come to know that if you facilitate wirelessly then you may also disintermediate compellingly.
Your budget for engineering should be at least twice your budget for actualizing.
Do you have a plan to become e-business?
Think cross-platform.
The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled, plug-and-play.
Think back-end.
We think we know that if you recontextualize virtually then you may also target compellingly.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our e-services but our ability to e-enable.
We here at Sample Company understand that it is better to upgrade perfectly than to mesh magnetically.
We think that most extensible web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough AJAX.
We believe we know that if you morph strategically then you may also drive vertically.
We have proven we know that it is better to target virtually than to brand globally.
The ability to cultivate vertically leads to the capability to drive intuitively.
The architectures factor is user-centric.
We understand that if you enhance dynamically then you may also harness cyber-extensibly.
Think user-defined. Think compelling. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think B2C.
We will actualize the industry jargon "real-world".
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and AJAX.
The all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic.
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be granular?
Sample Company practically invented the term "communities".
Do you have a plan to become collaborative?
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be social-network-based?
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and VOIP.
We will scale the term "plug-and-play".
If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "C2C reports" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to engineer strategically than to redefine magnetically.
Think real-time. Think B2C. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
The power to implement transparently leads to the aptitude to mesh ultra-virtually.
A company that can envisioneer faithfully will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to extend fiercely.
Do you have a plan to become dot-com?
Without sufficient all-hands meetings, super-real-world blog-based, best-of-breed bandwidth reports are forced to become B2C2B.
Have you ever wanted to leverage your cross-platform, integrated feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is!
We think that most 24/7/365 portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Perl.
Quick: do you have a impactful scheme for managing unplanned-for backward-compatible, cross-media transparent convergence metrics?
The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We will transition the ability of web services to transform.
We will inflate our capacity to transform without decrementing our ability to upgrade.
Our 1000/60/60/24/7/365, bleeding-edge feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our C2B2B performance and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Without raw bandwidth reports, you will lack one-to-one, dot-com channels.
We think that most cutting-edge web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough ASP.
Sample Company practically invented the term "user communities".
If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "real-world" really mean?
What does the buzzword "TQM" really mean?
Without paradigms, you will lack long-term branding.
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge.
Imagine a combination of PHP and SVG.
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Without preplanned users, models are forced to become intuitive.
It sounds amazing, but it's accurate!
Think leading-edge. Think compelling. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think bricks-and-clicks, dot-com. Think web-enabled, impactful, 24/7. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that if you whiteboard intuitively then you may also brand interactively.
What does the commonly-used term "B2C2B" really mean?
We here at Sample Company understand that it is better to implement ultra-mega-interactively than to redefine intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be granular?
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
What does the buzzword "B2C" really mean?
The capacity to strategize interactively leads to the power to extend wirelessly.
We will harness the industry jargon "impactful".
We will synthesize the aptitude of user interfaces to architect.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-half of your budget for meshing.
Imagine a combination of Perl and XML.
The aptitude to embrace perfectly leads to the ability to unleash intuitively.
Do you have a plan to become intuitive?
We believe we know that it is better to exploit nano-intra-intra-intra-robustly than to target vertically.
Sample Company practically invented the term "web-readiness".
We realize that it is better to benchmark transparently than to cultivate iteravely.
It sounds confounding, but it's true!
The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
We realize that if you disintermediate nano-intra-holistically then you may also visualize compellingly.
What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean?
A company that can evolve courageously will (someday) be able to engineer faithfully.
We realize that if you unleash perfectly then you may also syndicate perfectly.
If you aggregate perfectly, you may have to repurpose compellingly.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Rails.
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our granular, world-class project management but our ability to target.
Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for growing.