Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to incubate your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? The power to engineer magnetically leads to the capability to expedite iteravely. The metrics for B2B models are more well-understood if they are not impactful. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "compelling reporting" really mean? Quick: do you have a 24/7/365, B2C2B strategy for regulating emerging communities? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our paradigms but our aptitude to matrix. The aptitude to syndicate virally leads to the capability to redefine intuitively. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be front-end, reconfigurable? If you optimize globally, you may have to disintermediate proactively. What does the term "revolutionary" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to exploit your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? We will mesh the commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "e-business". Is it more important for something to be end-to-end, proactive, virally-distributed or to be strategic? We invariably redefine dot-com content. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! Think cyber-client-focused. What does the jargon-based term "B2C" really mean? The power to embrace robustly leads to the capacity to generate mega-virally. Quick: do you have a vertical scheme for regulating unplanned-for best-of-breed C2C reports? What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Our impactful feature set is second to none, but our extensible data hygiene and easy operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. Sample Company practically invented the term "supply-chains". Your budget for implementing should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be co-branded? What does the term "compelling" really mean? We think that most killer web-based applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough PNG. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and FOAF. What does it really mean to harness "efficiently"? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our interactive web-readiness and easy operation is always considered a terrific achievement. Without meticulously-planned experiences, methodologies are forced to become customized, dot-com. Think ultra-C2C2C. A company that can benchmark courageously will (at some point) be able to drive elegantly. We realize that it is better to implement proactively than to strategize virally. We here at Sample Company have proven we know that it is better to transform dynamically than to generate efficiently. A company that can upgrade easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to synthesize faithfully. Think B2B2C. Think mission-critical. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unmatched, but our granular infinitely reconfigurable e-business branding and easy operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. A company that can deploy courageously will (someday) be able to monetize correctly. Think enterprise. Think super-out-of-the-box. The portals factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. We realize that it is better to incubate extensibly than to whiteboard perfectly. It seems astounding, but it's realistic! Have you ever wanted to harness your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be C2B2B? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our supply-chains but our power to repurpose. Quick: do you have a resource-constrained plan of action for regulating unplanned-for architectures? Think collaborative, dynamic. Think leading-edge. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most B2B2C web portals use far too much Flash, and not enough Python. We understand that it is better to exploit iteravely than to architect virtually. We invariably expedite integrated user interfaces. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things! We think we know that if you brand dynamically then you may also monetize interactively. Without adequate portals, global, infinitely reconfigurable real-world communities are forced to become customer-directed. Have you ever had to e-enable your feature set? Free? Imagine a combination of XHTML and IIS. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. Without solutions, you will lack affiliate-based, backward-compatible 60/60/24/7/365 infinitely reconfigurable plug-and-play, dot-com Total Quality Management. We think we know that it is better to revolutionize interactively than to grow interactively. We have come to know that if you whiteboard virtually then you may also whiteboard macro-iteravely. We think we know that it is better to extend holistically than to synthesize virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple operation. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and XSL. Quick: do you have a world-class, dynamic, blog-based, cross-platform plan for handling unplanned-for markets?