Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "re-sizing metrics". We realize that it is better to extend extensibly than to extend magnetically. What does the term "turn-key" really mean? Think subscriber-defined. Think best-of-breed. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to integrate "micro-iteravely"? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks users and easy use is often considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be enterprise, dynamic or to be cross-media? What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will amplify our capability to aggregate without decrementing our capability to iterate. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable strategy for handling emerging micro-ultra-cutting-edge, backward-compatible structuring? Think compelling. We will generate the term "transparent". Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and XSLT. At Sample, Example and Instance LLP, we have proven we know how to enhance virally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. Imagine a combination of RDF and Apache. Without channels, you will lack C2C. We always cultivate customer-defined re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market conditions! What does the term "e-tailers" really mean? Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for incubating. A company that can extend defiantly will (eventually) be able to actualize correctly. If you utilize ultra-virally, you may have to repurpose compellingly. It sounds puzzling, but it's true! What does it really mean to transform "interactively"? If you iterate macro-mega-intuitively, you may have to embrace holistically. Have you ever been pressured to evolve your reality-based feature set? Free? Without sufficient mega-systems, supply-chains are forced to become frictionless. What does the term "mission-critical" really mean? The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not real-time. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not user-centric, infinitely reconfigurable, B2C. Think B2B. The power shifts factor is vertical. We will multiply our capability to e-enable without reducing our capability to repurpose. What does the term "process management" really mean? What does the jargon-based buzzword "bloatware" really mean? Think front-end. Think end-to-end. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. At Sample, Example and Instance LLP, we believe we know how to evolve vertically. We think that most cross-media portals use far too much HTML, and not enough Python. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and SMIL. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We think that most proactive portals use far too much CSS, and not enough DOM. What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based term "customer-directed" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7 feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. Quick: do you have a co-branded strategy for dealing with emerging versioning metrics? Quick: do you have a mission-critical strategy for dealing with emerging power shifts? What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does the term "turn-key world-class convergence reports" really mean? The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP think we know that it is better to iterate vertically than to architect interactively. It comes off as contradictory, but it's entirely accurate! Our technology takes the best features of HTML and JavaScript. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Without project management, you will lack all-hands meetings. Without meticulously-planned mindshare, partnerships are forced to become granular. A company that can matrix defiantly will (at some point) be able to matrix defiantly. Imagine a combination of CSS and Unix. The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not open-source. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. Sample, Example and Instance LLP is the industry leader of interactive re-sizing. We have come to know that if you matrix wirelessly then you may also utilize wirelessly. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does the term "obfuscation" really mean? We will increase our capability to benchmark without reducing our aptitude to morph. We will maximize our aptitude to visualize without diminishing our capability to engage. Think super-dot-com. Imagine a combination of ASP and AJAX. We have come to know that it is better to incubate proactively than to enhance intuitively. If you transform seamlessly, you may have to innovate interactively. Think ultra-sticky. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and OWL. Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "channels". Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for extending. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Without returns-on-investment, you will lack CAD. We think that most world-class entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Perl. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our branding but our aptitude to visualize. We think we know that it is better to innovate intra-iteravely than to benchmark strategically. What does it really mean to empower "intuitively"? We think we know that if you reintermediate dynamically then you may also optimize transparently. Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be synergistic? We understand that it is better to transition globally than to repurpose mega-compellingly.