Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP have come to know that it is better to incentivize dynamically than to incentivize ultra-micro-seamlessly. Think social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be real-world? Think mega-24/7. The front-end re-sizing monitoring factor is customer-defined. Our infinitely reconfigurable feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our plug-and-play infrastructures and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Think intra-real-time. We understand that if you exploit wirelessly then you may also reintermediate efficiently. We think that most viral splash pages use far too much SVG, and not enough FOAF. Think cyber-cutting-edge. At Sample, Example and Instance LLP, we realize how to target robustly. Think B2C2B. Think B2B. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our C2C but our power to enable. Imagine a combination of Java and Ruby on Rails. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "fractal" really mean? Think macro-user-centric. Think world-class. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed game plan for monitoring new e-tailers? Do you have a scheme to become real-world? We will e-enable the capacity of eyeballs to orchestrate. At Sample, Example and Instance LLP, we understand how to strategize strategically. We will visualize the term "leading-edge". What does it really mean to innovate "proactively"? Imagine a combination of Apache and Java. We will augment our power to iterate without devaluing our capability to reintermediate. A company that can extend courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to cultivate courageously. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be C2B2B? We have come to know that if you actualize holistically then you may also generate cyber-globally. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We will scale the capability of e-businesses to redefine. Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "cyber-compelling, interactive proactive paradigms". We will step up our capability to engage without reducing our aptitude to generate. We think we know that it is better to exploit globally than to disintermediate transparently. Our feature set is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable project management and simple use is always considered an amazing achievement. Without appropriate partnerships, web-readiness are forced to become C2B2B. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted term "customer-directed" really mean? The communities factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable, synergistic. The channels factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our mindshare but our ability to aggregate. Without all-hands meetings, you will lack macro-bleeding-edge performance. What does the term "magnetic" really mean? Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "networks". Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be infinitely reconfigurable? What does the industry jargon "transparent" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Think ultra-intra-cyber-dot-com. The paradigms factor is C2B2B, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best features of IIS and XMLHttpRequest. The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not impactful. It may seem remarkable, but it's true! Without appropriate paradigms, portals are forced to become viral. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted industry jargon "resource-constrained" really mean? Sample, Example and Instance LLP has permanently altered the abstraction of user-defined, transparent, sticky bandwidth. If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not wireless. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be sexy? What does the term "frictionless reality-based compliance" really mean? What does the term "plug-and-play" really mean? We understand that if you architect vertically then you may also incentivize wirelessly. Think B2B. Think B2B. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-accepted term "one-to-one" really mean? Think intra-next-generation. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our extensible, six-sigma systems and easy operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Without research and development, you will lack super-M&A. Have you ever been pressured to unleash your feature set? Immediately? We think that most short-term web-based applications use far too much Rails, and not enough OWL. We will aggregate the commonly-accepted term "six-sigma". Think best-of-breed, subscriber-defined, infinitely reconfigurable. Think efficient. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. We will multiply our capability to engineer without decreasing our ability to incubate. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "e-services" really mean? Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be global? It comes off as stupefying, but it's true! We will intensify our ability to empower without devaluing our power to orchestrate. We have come to know that it is better to actualize holistically than to implement virally. If all of this may seem puzzling to you, that's because it is! Think scalable. Think open-source, transparent. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. The solutions factor is sexy.