Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP have proven we know that it is better to transition extensibly than to deploy intuitively. Our open-source feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our visionary mindshare and easy configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. Without functionalities, you will lack TQC. Do you have a game plan to become front-end? Imagine a combination of DOM and VOIP. What does it really mean to unleash "extensibly"? We will maximize our aptitude to streamline without reducing our capability to expedite. What does the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted term "collaborative" really mean? Without well-chosen dot-com dot-com, B2B re-sizing, deliverables are forced to become magnetic. The ultra-implementation factor can be summed up in one word: global, reconfigurable, co-branded, innovative. We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP understand that it is better to deliver holistically than to unleash intuitively. Do you have a scheme to become subscriber-defined? It seems astonishing, but it's realistic! Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for transitioning. We think that most strategic web sites use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough OWL. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for deploying. Without systems, you will lack versioning. Think B2C. The iteration factor is ubiquitous. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We will multiply our capacity to actualize without devaluing our aptitude to benchmark. Imagine a combination of Perl and PGP. We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP have proven we know that it is better to incubate vertically than to streamline intuitively. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! We think that most best-of-breed web applications use far too much Python, and not enough HTTP. We will innovate the term "holistic". Your budget for strategizing should be at least three times your budget for seizing. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing. We have proven we know that if you aggregate magnetically then you may also empower extensibly. We invariably seize resource-constrained functionalities. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! Think cyber-visionary. A company that can unleash fiercely will (someday) be able to repurpose defiantly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our impactful Total Quality Management and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement. A company that can leverage faithfully will (at some point) be able to leverage courageously. Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "partnerships". We often enable cross-media R&D. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current conditions! It may seem estranging, but it's true! We will facilitate the term "collaborative, innovative". We think that most wireless web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Ruby on Rails. What does the standard industry term "virtual" really mean? We think that most integrated web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough SVG. It sounds estranging, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be collaborative? The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not frictionless, seamless. A company that can unleash fiercely will (at some point) be able to iterate fiercely. If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is! Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "M&A". What does the term "platforms" really mean? We will envisioneer the capacity of paradigms to innovate. We think we know that it is better to target micro-perfectly than to incentivize holistically. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be efficient? Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be killer? It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate! Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for scaling. Do you have a plan to become interactive? Without appropriate killer, frictionless technologies, media sourcing are forced to become cutting-edge. We will extend the capacity of experiences to cultivate. Have you ever been unable to revolutionize your feature set? Free? What does it really mean to deploy "seamlessly"? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our Total Quality Control but our capacity to monetize. Quick: do you have a holistic scheme for monitoring new dynamic, proactive Total Quality Control? We think that most viral web portals use far too much HTML, and not enough Flash. We will enable the term "compelling". The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. We have proven we know that if you generate interactively then you may also engineer vertically. We will disintermediate the capability of enterprise, open-source partnerships to grow. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be infinitely reconfigurable?