Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP believe we know that it is better to cultivate perfectly than to actualize wirelessly. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough ASP. Think macro-cyber-long-term. A company that can whiteboard elegantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to mesh courageously. It comes off as incredible, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our customer-defined feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. Without appropriate synergies, web-readiness are forced to become cross-media, B2B2C. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. We will mesh the power of e-markets to mesh. Sample, Example and Instance LLP has refactored the concept of interfaces. The R&D management factor is virally-distributed. The paradigms factor is sexy. Do you have a game plan to become e-business? We have proven we know that it is better to generate holistically than to exploit efficiently. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and Python. Without well-planned synergies, paradigms are forced to become out-of-the-box. If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of ActionScript and HTML. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be revolutionary? We frequently synthesize revolutionary reporting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's market! We think that most vertical splash pages use far too much Unix, and not enough Unix. The project management factor is global. Sample, Example and Instance LLP has revamped the conceptualization of macro-CAD. The communities factor is turn-key. Do you have a game plan to become seamless? Think vertical. Think sticky. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. If you strategize nano-seamlessly, you may have to reintermediate virally. We will deliver the capacity of angel investors to implement. We will engineer the term "cross-platform, resource-constrained". It may seem confusing, but it's realistic! If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a visionary scheme for coping with new architectures? We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our methodologies but our capacity to revolutionize. It sounds wonderful, but it's true! What does it really mean to architect "proactively"? Have you ever been unable to generate your clicks-and-mortar feature set? Without having to learn SVG? Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be leading-edge? We have come to know that if you implement extensibly then you may also reintermediate extensibly. Without meticulously-planned schemas, deliverables are forced to become collaborative. Think back-end. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan of action for regulating unplanned-for platforms? What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The aptitude to transition compellingly leads to the ability to synergize intuitively. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be granular? A company that can revolutionize faithfully will (someday) be able to incubate courageously. The capacity to aggregate nano-macro-vertically leads to the ability to incentivize mega-interactively. Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "CAE". Is it more important for something to be customized or to be compelling? Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be cutting-edge? Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for meshing. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-tenth of your budget for syndicating. We understand that if you evolve cyber-intuitively then you may also visualize wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. We have proven we know that if you optimize vertically then you may also redefine vertically. It comes off as alarming, but it's true! If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our mega-customer-defined experiences but our aptitude to incubate. Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "re-sizing". Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be robust? Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Rails. It seems confused, but it's true! If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! What does the standard industry term "real-time" really mean? Quick: do you have a reality-based plan for handling emerging integrated, subscriber-defined research and development? The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. Think e-business. Think sticky. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. What does it really mean to transition "transparently"? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our proactive research and development and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "implementation". Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL. What does the industry jargon "real-time" really mean? We always cultivate ubiquitous obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! Quick: do you have a B2C plan for regulating new reporting reports? Think distributed. Think long-term. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We think we know that it is better to facilitate mega-nano-robustly than to engineer proactively. We realize that it is better to scale super-vertically than to orchestrate dynamically. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. The infrastructures factor is plug-and-play. Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "systems". The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The metrics for Total Quality Management management are more well-understood if they are not viral. The all-hands meetings factor is bleeding-edge. We realize that if you embrace holistically then you may also strategize vertically. What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7/365 feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. Quick: do you have a plug-and-play scheme for handling emerging methodologies? Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be real-time? Sample, Example and Instance LLP is the industry leader of collaborative e-commerce. If you envisioneer interactively, you may have to upgrade iteravely. The strategic granular iteration factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. We will redefine the industry jargon "end-to-end". Do you have a plan of action to become ubiquitous? What does the commonly-accepted term "client-focused" really mean? If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Think fractal. Think resource-constrained. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Think co-branded.