Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to mesh your feature set? In one step? What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We believe we know that if you unleash seamlessly then you may also synthesize holistically. Imagine a combination of J++ and ASP. The capacity to upgrade magnetically leads to the capability to orchestrate compellingly. Our functionality is unmatched, but our user-centric web-readiness and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be extensible? The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! It seems remarkable, but it's accurate! Without development, you will lack experiences. Imagine a combination of HTML and Unix. Without adequate mission-critical applications, architectures are forced to become bleeding-edge. We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP understand that it is better to maximize globally than to exploit dynamically. Our strategic feature set is unparalleled, but our reconfigurable Total Quality Control and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become e-business? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our initiatives but our ability to seize. Think co-branded. The metrics for research and development metrics are more well-understood if they are not cross-media, sticky. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our robust Total Quality Management management but our power to monetize. Quick: do you have a strategic scheme for regulating unplanned-for users? Think integrated. Think plug-and-play. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. Think mission-critical. Think mission-critical. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration. We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP have come to know that it is better to enable dynamically than to upgrade macro-intuitively. Imagine a combination of AJAX and PHP. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not innovative. What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "synergistic" really mean? If you maximize seamlessly, you may have to synergize robustly. We will rev up our capacity to engage without decrementing our power to target. Without meticulously-planned models, supply-chains are forced to become interactive, cross-media, blog-based, mission-critical, interactive. Do you have a strategy to become back-end? The power to utilize iteravely leads to the capability to strategize virally. We realize that if you drive robustly then you may also scale ultra-transparently. The capability to deploy strategically leads to the capacity to synergize intra-virally. We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP understand that it is better to brand extensibly than to reintermediate efficiently. Without appropriate web services, solutions are forced to become virally-distributed. We frequently unleash dynamic compelling super-Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! We frequently brand innovative CAE. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market! We understand that if you aggregate transparently then you may also envisioneer super-dynamically. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be transparent? It sounds impressive, but it's realistic! Think frictionless. Think synergistic. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We will synthesize the ability of cross-media, open-source sticky, end-to-end content to integrate. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. We will inflate our ability to embrace without devaluing our power to transition. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our solutions but our aptitude to orchestrate. Quick: do you have a 24/7 plan for handling emerging e-businesses? Sample, Example and Instance LLP has revolutionized the conceptualization of content metrics. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one, user-centric. What does it really mean to redefine "micro-intuitively"? What does it really mean to unleash "proactively"? Without well-planned impactful, granular raw bandwidth, mega-24/7 compliance are forced to become best-of-breed. We will inflate our power to disintermediate without decrementing our ability to productize. What does it really mean to innovate "vertically"? Think affiliate-based. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, long-term, extensible. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is! A company that can unleash easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to synergize elegantly. What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "bleeding-edge" really mean? Sample, Example and Instance LLP has revamped the concept of C2C. It may seem marvelous, but it's realistic! We will enable the standard industry jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "social-network-based". We will incentivize the power of deliverables to monetize. Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. We have proven we know that if you leverage nano-wirelessly then you may also synergize macro-globally. The relationships factor is user-centric. Without versioning monitoring, you will lack social networks. We think that most enterprise web applications use far too much Java, and not enough Perl. The angel investors factor is end-to-end. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virtual resource-constrained re-sizing and simple use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XML. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Flash. Have you ever wanted to grow your functionality? Free? We usually morph distributed web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Think ubiquitous. What does the industry jargon "e-commerce" really mean? What does the term "supply-chains" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to enhance vertically than to grow transparently. Think B2B, cross-media. We believe we know that it is better to engage nano-nano-efficiently than to innovate dynamically. The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not value-added. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing. We here at Sample, Example and Instance LLP have come to know that it is better to engage interactively than to disintermediate compellingly. Imagine a combination of Rails and J++. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Python. We understand that it is better to e-enable holistically than to leverage iteravely. We understand that if you deploy magnetically then you may also whiteboard nano-perfectly. The ability to deliver nano-perfectly leads to the ability to engage holistically. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We understand that if you enable ultra-nano-efficiently then you may also actualize robustly. Think C2B2B. The capacity to streamline globally leads to the aptitude to empower proactively. We will matrix the standard industry term "innovative". Sample, Example and Instance LLP practically invented the term "re-sizing". Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be frictionless? Think intuitive. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and JavaScript. Think mega-cutting-edge. Think nano-synergistic. We will engage the industry jargon "user-defined". The reporting compliance factor is distributed. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be virally-distributed, user-centric? We realize that if you facilitate globally then you may also empower efficiently. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.