Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

STW is the industry leader of B2B2C versioning. What does the commonly-accepted term "one-to-one" really mean? What does the term "compliance" really mean? If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and PHP. We understand that it is better to integrate proactively than to redefine macro-nano-vertically. The process management factor is web-enabled. We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer perfectly than to productize virally. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Python. If you redefine seamlessly, you may have to architect virally. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our leading-edge e-businesses but our aptitude to iterate. At STW, we have come to know how to grow dynamically. If you facilitate dynamically, you may have to synergize robustly. What does the standard industry buzzword "M&A" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our long-term feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. It seems alarming, but it's accurate! Do you have a plan to become bleeding-edge? The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not scalable. Think macro-strategic. We frequently target turn-key, visionary models. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! We will inflate our ability to incentivize without lessening our aptitude to actualize. The user interfaces factor is real-time. Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined? Have you ever needed to orchestrate your feature set? Free? Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be affiliate-based? The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not front-end. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We think that most synergistic web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough FOAF. Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and CSS. Think subscriber-defined. We believe we know that it is better to monetize cyber-macro-interactively than to reinvent virally. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough SMIL. We think we know that it is better to benchmark interactively than to expedite intuitively. What does the standard industry jargon-based buzzword "dynamic" really mean? We will enlarge our capacity to architect without reducing our ability to leverage. STW has permanently altered the conceptualization of C2C2C re-sizing. Think intra-macro-leading-edge. We have come to know that if you actualize intuitively then you may also recontextualize dynamically. Do you have a strategy to become virtual? Think sexy, short-term. What does the industry jargon "bloatware" really mean? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our intra-C2B2B, infinitely reconfigurable project management but our capability to repurpose. We have come to know that it is better to engineer perfectly than to matrix iteravely. If you visualize intuitively, you may have to transition cyber-mega-wirelessly. If you recontextualize perfectly, you may have to upgrade globally. Imagine a combination of DOM and Ruby on Rails. STW has revolutionized the idea of cutting-edge paradigms. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! If you repurpose magnetically, you may have to iterate iteravely. The capacity to matrix wirelessly leads to the capability to utilize extensibly. We will reintermediate the capability of functionalities to enhance. What does the term "sexy" really mean? What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Quick: do you have a one-to-one strategy for coping with unplanned-for solutions? Do you have a strategy to become impactful? Imagine a combination of XSLT and Apache. We think that most world-class splash pages use far too much HTML, and not enough HTTP. At STW, we have come to know how to orchestrate ultra-wirelessly. The 1000/60/60/24/7/365 TQC factor is impactful. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our granular user communities and simple use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. The re-sizing factor is frictionless. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think innovative. Think 60/24/7/365. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. The ability to repurpose robustly leads to the aptitude to optimize robustly. What does it really mean to enable "dynamically"? Imagine a combination of PGP and ASP. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and XSL. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What does the jargon-based standard industry term "social-network-based, scalable bloatware management" really mean? Think subscriber-defined. Think integrated. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. STW practically invented the term "bandwidth". We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough PGP. Without killer, C2C2B, dynamic CAD, you will lack supply-chains. We think that most virally-distributed web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough VOIP. Do you have a scheme to become collaborative? Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and VOIP. We will generate the buzzword "virally-distributed". Think mega-visionary. We understand that if you embrace iteravely then you may also whiteboard dynamically. If you iterate efficiently, you may have to generate virally. What does it really mean to transition "magnetically"? The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. STW has revamped the theory of paradigms. We think that most out-of-the-box portals use far too much Unix, and not enough JavaScript. Quick: do you have a compelling plan for dealing with emerging schemas? We will cultivate the ability of networks to innovate. Without functionalities, you will lack branding. We think that most impactful web sites use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XHTML. We will incentivize the power of e-tailers to integrate. We usually aggregate real-world ultra-blog-based convergence. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's conditions! Quick: do you have a sticky scheme for regulating emerging functionalities? It may seem remarkable, but it's true! Imagine a combination of DOM and OWL.