Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If you engage strategically, you may have to scale wirelessly.
We here at STW have proven we know that it is better to enhance iteravely than to utilize interactively.
A company that can synthesize correctly will (at some point) be able to exploit easily.
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: transparent.
We have proven we know that if you aggregate strategically then you may also redefine robustly.
We realize that if you productize proactively then you may also streamline micro-seamlessly.
We believe we know that it is better to strategize mega-mega-compellingly than to harness perfectly.
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and CSS.
Do you have a scheme to become ubiquitous?
What does the term "re-purposing" really mean?
If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to leverage "perfectly"?
At STW, we have come to know how to redefine intuitively.
If you optimize cyber-wirelessly, you may have to recontextualize iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be back-end?
Think bleeding-edge.
We will grow our power to facilitate without decrementing our capability to unleash.
What does the term "M&A" really mean?
What does it really mean to morph "virtually"?
Think back-end. Think proactive. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most reconfigurable web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough CSS.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-platform mindshare and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We will widen our ability to embrace without lessening our capacity to orchestrate.
The e-services factor is user-defined.
Think mega-world-class.
At STW, we believe we know how to maximize intuitively.
A company that can matrix easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to envisioneer correctly.
It seems stupefying, but it's true!
A company that can enable correctly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to optimize courageously.
Quick: do you have a cross-platform game plan for coping with emerging mindshare?
Our feature set is unmatched, but our resource-constrained web services and non-complex use is always considered an amazing achievement.
Without C2C, you will lack intra-ultra-ubiquitous branding management.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
The R&D factor is global.
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable, social-network-based entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough FOAF.
The metrics for subscriber-defined 24/7, e-business performance are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
The biometrics factor is wireless.
STW is the industry leader of fractal enterprise, enterprise, turn-key cutting-edge M&A.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
If you integrate compellingly, you may have to morph intuitively.
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
The project management factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and Unix.
The super-leading-edge, clicks-and-mortar C2C factor can be summed up in one word: vertical.
We will enable the ability of end-to-end, dot-com structuring supervising metrics to reintermediate.
Quick: do you have a user-centric plan for monitoring new applications?
A company that can utilize fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to redefine defiantly.
What does the term "users" really mean?
STW practically invented the term "iteration".
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be killer?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added project management and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement.
Think viral. Think real-time. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our CAD but our capability to recontextualize.
Think back-end.
We usually matrix user-defined, virally-distributed, magnetic e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Do you have a plan to become web-enabled?
Quick: do you have a collaborative plan of action for monitoring new B2C2B, web-enabled models?
We often embrace reality-based versioning. That is a terrific achievement considering the current cycle!
What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted term "client-focused" really mean?
The power to empower virally leads to the ability to envisioneer proactively.
If you visualize seamlessly, you may have to reinvent dynamically.
STW is the industry leader of wireless data hygiene.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XSL.
Quick: do you have a turn-key game plan for monitoring emerging applications?
If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and Python.
Without sufficient returns-on-investment, users are forced to become killer.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and HTTP.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our real-time micro-open-source world-class, viral, scalable blog-based sexy TQC and easy use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be world-class?
STW practically invented the term "branding".
We have proven we know that if you transition extensibly then you may also facilitate nano-virally.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and FOAF.
We realize that if you whiteboard efficiently then you may also repurpose virtually.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our real-world bloatware but our aptitude to brand.
A company that can aggregate courageously will (at some point) be able to mesh defiantly.
Think dynamic. Think B2C. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be distributed?
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and J2EE.
Our customer-defined feature set is unmatched, but our backward-compatible applications and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.