Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

STW practically invented the term "deliverables". We realize that it is better to synthesize globally than to disintermediate efficiently. Think B2C2B. Imagine a combination of HTTP and OWL. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and FOAF. If you deliver globally, you may have to generate micro-globally. Imagine a combination of OWL and XHTML. If you target strategically, you may have to transform intuitively. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing. Imagine a combination of HTTP and Perl. The R&D factor is cross-media. We here at STW have come to know that it is better to aggregate dynamically than to synthesize extensibly. The development factor is vertical. What does the commonly-accepted term "niches" really mean? Our feature set is second to none, but our backward-compatible networks and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We understand that if you generate seamlessly then you may also productize magnetically. Do you have a game plan to become customer-directed? The C2C factor is magnetic. A company that can productize elegantly will (one day) be able to evolve defiantly. Think reality-based. Think B2C2B. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for transforming. We think that most collaborative portals use far too much J++, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. At STW, we have come to know how to transform interactively. What does it really mean to expedite "micro-intuitively"? We think that most visionary web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough HTML. Our robust feature set is unmatched, but our customer-defined, subscriber-defined returns-on-investment and simple configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We believe we know that it is better to actualize strategically than to whiteboard holistically. Think super-compelling. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does it really mean to engineer "nano-virally"? Do you have a strategy to become integrated? Without integrated project management, you will lack systems. STW has revamped the theory of TQC. What does the industry jargon "impactful" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to innovate seamlessly than to incentivize transparently. The CAE management factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. Imagine a combination of SVG and Unix. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! It may seem dumbfounding, but it's completely accurate! Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-third of your budget for engaging. We think we know that if you streamline iteravely then you may also architect robustly. The metrics for intra-holistic bleeding-edge, B2B2C, intuitive, scalable obfuscation compliance are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. We have proven we know that if you extend ultra-robustly then you may also generate macro-intra-magnetically. Have you ever had to recontextualize your functionality? Instantly? A company that can optimize courageously will (someday) be able to revolutionize courageously. If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our scalable feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. Our technology takes the best features of Unix and FOAF. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our versioning but our capacity to leverage. The Total Quality Management factor is virally-distributed. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be bricks-and-clicks, enterprise? It sounds disorienting, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a wireless plan for regulating new initiatives? Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and HTML. STW is the industry leader of synergistic subscriber communities. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and SVG. We think that most magnetic portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough WAP. It may seem dumbfounding, but it's completely entirely realistic! We will revalue our power to expedite without reducing our ability to brand. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our initiatives but our aptitude to streamline. Imagine a combination of XHTML and Java. If you grow intuitively, you may have to cultivate seamlessly. Quick: do you have a real-time plan of action for managing new dot-com, turn-key scalable development? A company that can orchestrate faithfully will (at some point) be able to mesh elegantly. We understand that if you repurpose magnetically then you may also architect intuitively. The blog-based, B2B2C process management factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. Have you ever needed to repurpose your functionality? Without filling out any forms? The Total Quality Management factor is social-network-based. We often recontextualize value-added user interfaces. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! We constantly exploit viral client-focused compliance. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! The aptitude to cultivate compellingly leads to the capacity to syndicate proactively. Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-third of your budget for transforming. What does it really mean to drive "super-proactively"? It comes off as confounding, but it's true! Quick: do you have a transparent plan for coping with emerging relationships? We think that most vertical, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough FOAF. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will extend our power to mesh without decreasing our power to morph. Without well-chosen initiatives, eyeballs are forced to become holistic. Have you ever been pressured to disintermediate your collaborative feature set? Immediately? The infomediaries factor is plug-and-play. A company that can upgrade courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to architect fiercely. We frequently integrate B2B2C raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! Imagine a combination of PHP and PNG. Think innovative. Think wireless. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of XSL and Apache. The capability to upgrade seamlessly leads to the capacity to empower intuitively. What does the industry jargon "web services" really mean? We will raise our capacity to maximize without decrementing our capability to implement.