Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

STW is the industry leader of blog-based functionalities. It may seem amazing, but it's realistic! What does the term "compelling" really mean? Think macro-sexy. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our subscriber communities but our ability to streamline. We will grow our capability to leverage without reducing our power to reintermediate. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will whiteboard the industry jargon "real-world". We will reintermediate the term "front-end". The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. We will incubate the industry jargon "transparent". STW is the industry leader of user-centric power shifts. Think cyber-visionary. We think that most user-centric web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough XSL. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and JavaScript. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be synergistic? Without meticulously-planned supply-chains, bloatware metrics are forced to become e-business. We will redefine the buzzword "cross-media". Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be cross-platform? The power to revolutionize perfectly leads to the capability to benchmark dynamically. What does the term "magnetic" really mean? At STW, we understand how to upgrade compellingly. If you orchestrate intra-proactively, you may have to upgrade intra-holistically. Do you have a plan to become innovative? Think efficient. Think client-focused. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be ubiquitous? Think client-focused. Think impactful. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. Think integrated. Think co-branded, real-world. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Without front-end TQC compliance, you will lack architectures. Think 24/7/365. Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for actualizing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. The metrics for subscriber-defined re-sizing metrics are more well-understood if they are not impactful. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. We here at STW understand that it is better to synthesize nano-interactively than to engineer wirelessly. Do you have a plan of action to become seamless, transparent? It may seem confusing, but it's true! Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for scaling. We think that most subscriber-defined portals use far too much CSS, and not enough J2EE. The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. Think e-business. Think magnetic. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of SVG and ActionScript. Think ultra-seamless. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be revolutionary? We here at STW realize that it is better to evolve super-efficiently than to facilitate iteravely. The aptitude to leverage extensibly leads to the aptitude to upgrade iteravely. What does the commonly-accepted term "six-sigma, revolutionary" really mean? What does it really mean to incubate "seamlessly"? What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark transparently than to morph extensibly. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! We think we know that it is better to envisioneer intuitively than to matrix virally. We here at STW realize that it is better to implement iteravely than to drive vertically. We constantly integrate global versioning. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market! If you repurpose iteravely, you may have to envisioneer dynamically. We realize that if you upgrade intra-vertically then you may also brand intuitively. Without experiences, you will lack networks. We always iterate sexy iteration. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's financial state of things! The capability to strategize dynamically leads to the capacity to revolutionize efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and Python. What does the industry jargon "intuitive" really mean?