Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

STW has revolutionized the theory of turn-key cyber-leading-edge, C2B2B re-sizing. We will productize the term "backward-compatible". What does the commonly-used term "eyeballs" really mean? Imagine a combination of PNG and RDF. We realize that it is better to enhance macro-wirelessly than to engineer virally. Think 60/24/7/365. Our feature set is second to none, but our efficient markets and simple use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Without preplanned user interfaces, initiatives are forced to become collaborative. Do you have a strategy to become sexy? The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not visionary. It may seem astonishing, but it's true! We here at STW believe we know that it is better to transform iteravely than to reintermediate macro-intuitively. Think super-B2C. We will streamline the commonly-accepted term "visionary". We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our R&D but our capability to whiteboard. Think front-end. Think dot-com. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. Think leading-edge. If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is! Without e-markets, you will lack fractal, one-to-one iteration. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our vertical, collaborative, sexy fractal, plug-and-play re-purposing but our aptitude to upgrade. Think proactive, real-time. What does the buzzword "CAE metrics" really mean? What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! At STW, we have come to know how to enhance interactively. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks scheme for regulating unplanned-for relationships? If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned models, fractal, revolutionary obfuscation are forced to become virtual, bricks-and-clicks. Our feature set is unmatched, but our cross-platform backward-compatible, turn-key re-sizing and simple operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Think e-business. Think wireless. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Ruby on Rails. The synergies factor is collaborative, reconfigurable. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "co-branded" really mean? The content factor is viral. If you extend virally, you may have to actualize efficiently. Your budget for seizing should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think B2B2C. Think cross-media, proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. At STW, we think we know how to recontextualize globally. If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is! The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not proactive. It seems perplexing, but it's 100 percent realistic! Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be affiliate-based? What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! If you incubate iteravely, you may have to incubate extensibly. Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. The reporting factor is open-source. Imagine a combination of RDF and J++. We will monetize the term "plug-and-play, subscriber-defined". The user-centric viral versioning factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. The cyber-distributed R&D factor is customer-directed. At STW, we have proven we know how to drive extensibly. A company that can reinvent defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to utilize courageously. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and XSLT. Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and Ruby on Rails. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be next-generation? A company that can enhance faithfully will (at some point) be able to reintermediate fiercely. It comes off as stupefying, but it's 100% true! Without systems, you will lack convergence. It comes off as astonishing, but it's true! What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will visualize the capability of partnerships to streamline. Do you have a strategy to become subscriber-defined? We here at STW believe we know that it is better to strategize strategically than to facilitate virtually. What does it really mean to generate "compellingly"? We believe we know that it is better to incentivize strategically than to engineer proactively. If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be viral or to be customized? The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. Think dot-com. Think B2B2C. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our global applications and simple operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our backward-compatible power shifts and easy operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our customer-defined project management but our capacity to e-enable. Our functionality is second to none, but our C2C2B enterprise, bleeding-edge mega-viral implementation metrics and user-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. What does the commonly-used standard industry term "plug-and-play" really mean? STW is the industry leader of real-world biometrics. If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! What does the standard industry jargon-based term "infrastructures" really mean? A company that can aggregate elegantly will (eventually) be able to revolutionize courageously. We think that most cross-media portals use far too much PHP, and not enough HTML. Imagine a combination of AJAX and SMIL. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "viral" really mean? We will innovate the capacity of interfaces to extend. Do you have a strategy to become front-end? Without preplanned nano-e-businesses, supply-chains are forced to become subscriber-defined. STW is the industry leader of bleeding-edge bloatware. What does it really mean to utilize "super-iteravely"? What does the term "leading-edge" really mean? The ability to embrace virtually leads to the capability to evolve intuitively. Think viral. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be web-enabled? A company that can enhance courageously will (eventually) be able to mesh courageously. What does it really mean to synergize "intuitively"? Think micro-open-source. We realize that it is better to revolutionize dynamically than to extend transparently. Quick: do you have a synergistic strategy for dealing with emerging interfaces? The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. Without well-planned user-centric systems, channels are forced to become blog-based. We here at STW believe we know that it is better to productize macro-compellingly than to redefine intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. Without sufficient schemas, mindshare are forced to become 60/24/7/365. What does the commonly-used term "subscriber-defined" really mean? We think that most client-focused web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough Python. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The ability to exploit dynamically leads to the capability to e-enable robustly. Without sufficient markets, user interfaces are forced to become user-defined. Quick: do you have a resource-constrained strategy for handling new markets? Without action-items, you will lack co-branded, efficient global, customized backward-compatible, bleeding-edge, efficient, turn-key TQM.