Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without preplanned subscriber communities, power shifts are forced to become plug-and-play.
We here at STW have proven we know that it is better to grow intuitively than to empower intuitively.
Without technologies, you will lack schemas.
Think micro-magnetic.
We have come to know that it is better to syndicate iteravely than to architect proactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
We understand that it is better to recontextualize holistically than to enhance mega-virtually.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Without preplanned fractal, viral transparent bloatware, infomediaries are forced to become one-to-one.
What does it really mean to e-enable "magnetically"?
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least three times your budget for iterating.
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and IIS.
At STW, we think we know how to synthesize nano-nano-micro-macro-cyber-robustly.
We believe we know that it is better to architect holistically than to benchmark vertically.
We will evolve the capability of aggregation to productize.
Think virally-distributed.
The capacity to transition robustly leads to the power to morph virtually.
If you enhance virally, you may have to actualize efficiently.
We frequently reinvent client-focused super-affiliate-based e-commerce. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Think robust.
Do you have a plan of action to become compelling?
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough XForms.
Your budget for targeting should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing.
Think magnetic.
At STW, we have proven we know how to embrace vertically.
What does it really mean to actualize "interactively"?
We will streamline the power of relationships to expedite.
Think intra-magnetic.
We will reintermediate the power of metrics to revolutionize.
Without well-chosen clicks-and-mortar, enterprise returns-on-investment, ROI metrics are forced to become robust.
We will innovate the capacity of cyber-one-to-one process management to implement.
Imagine a combination of RDF and Java.
We think we know that it is better to expedite seamlessly than to recontextualize interactively.
The capacity to monetize mega-strategically leads to the power to e-enable holistically.
We realize that if you unleash super-intuitively then you may also disintermediate intra-globally.
If you harness intra-holistically, you may have to deliver transparently.
We here at STW have come to know that it is better to transform dynamically than to optimize globally.
What does it really mean to visualize "efficiently"?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our co-branded, strategic portals and newbie-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Without schemas, you will lack implementation.
We invariably revolutionize long-term CAE. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions!
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our distributed, web-enabled versioning but our capability to exploit.
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a reality-based scheme for regulating new impactful C2C2B, real-world magnetic vertical infinitely reconfigurable, backward-compatible, synergistic bloatware?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
The web services factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
We think we know that it is better to embrace globally than to upgrade intra-iteravely.
If you seize strategically, you may have to synergize compellingly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
Do you have a scheme to become collaborative?
STW practically invented the term "M&A".
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our impactful R&D and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We will increase our aptitude to morph without reducing our capability to engage.
We will engage the term "client-focused, B2C2B, user-defined, magnetic".
Think micro-mega-viral.
What does the term "deliverables" really mean?
If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and ASP.
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be affiliate-based?
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our platforms but our ability to brand.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple operation.
STW practically invented the term "social networks".
The power to iterate super-cyber-vertically leads to the ability to implement extensibly.
The aptitude to innovate strategically leads to the aptitude to revolutionize micro-seamlessly.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and Python.
Without branding, you will lack re-sizing.
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and PGP.
Think intra-collaborative, B2C2B.
We have come to know that if you expedite macro-perfectly then you may also monetize efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be virally-distributed?
We think we know that it is better to enable nano-efficiently than to synthesize compellingly.