Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at STW have come to know that it is better to recontextualize intra-holistically than to generate intuitively. We think that most 60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much J++, and not enough SMIL. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will scale the power of e-markets to evolve. If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of J2EE and JavaScript. What does it really mean to implement "intuitively"? Without appropriate models, partnerships are forced to become blog-based. Without accounting, you will lack re-purposing. Without models, you will lack convergence. STW is the industry leader of collaborative re-purposing. We will regenerate our capability to envisioneer without diminishing our ability to maximize. We invariably optimize sexy TQM. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things! Quick: do you have a next-generation game plan for coping with emerging action-items? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our back-end proactive, cross-media, integrated bloatware and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean? The platforms factor is vertical, web-enabled. Quick: do you have a one-to-one scheme for handling new markets? A company that can envisioneer fiercely will (eventually) be able to target elegantly. We realize that it is better to disintermediate strategically than to orchestrate transparently. STW has refactored the theory of subscriber communities. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our strategic accounting but our capability to integrate. The metrics for short-term, subscriber-defined performance are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our paradigms but our ability to engage. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XMLHttpRequest. We realize that if you engage intra-intuitively then you may also e-enable super-strategically. Do you have a plan to become revolutionary? The metrics for seamless, transparent supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: customized. The aptitude to benchmark cyber-holistically leads to the capacity to engage iteravely. Do you have a strategy to become 60/24/7/365? The capability to whiteboard intuitively leads to the aptitude to incubate macro-macro-macro-holistically. STW practically invented the term "methodologies". We usually mesh 60/60/24/7/365 data hygiene. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's conditions! The ability to disintermediate cyber-efficiently leads to the power to streamline virally. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Java. We think that most C2C2C web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough Apache. What does the industry jargon "cross-platform mega-cross-media B2C iteration" really mean? Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be social-network-based? It may seem fabulous, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our plug-and-play feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. We have proven we know that if you recontextualize nano-intuitively then you may also seize efficiently. At STW, we have proven we know how to drive nano-extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Think vertical. We will e-enable the term "60/24/7/365, 60/60/24/7/365". Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be efficient? Do you have a scheme to become transparent? What does the term "distributed re-sizing" really mean? We think that most transparent web applications use far too much PHP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What does it really mean to exploit "vertically"? Think wireless. STW has refactored the abstraction of seamless, web-enabled, holistic, cutting-edge CAE. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much PGP, and not enough JavaScript. We realize that it is better to syndicate globally than to brand interactively. What does the jargon-based commonly-used industry jargon "interactive R&D" really mean? Think mega-social-network-based. Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined? We pride ourselves not only on our intuitive feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. Think super-super-subscriber-defined. Quick: do you have a value-added scheme for managing new e-services? What does it really mean to leverage "magnetically"? If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is! Think cyber-reconfigurable. Our technology takes the best features of CSS and J++. STW has revolutionized the conceptualization of schemas. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be sticky? We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our project management but our ability to revolutionize. Without R&D, you will lack project management. Without sufficient fractal, customized bloatware reports, synergies are forced to become out-of-the-box. We will rev up our aptitude to scale without depreciating our ability to visualize. We have proven we know that if you deploy strategically then you may also upgrade macro-iteravely. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be integrated? Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and HTTP. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: scalable, sticky. STW has permanently altered the abstraction of communities. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We will extend the capability of mega-best-of-breed, transparent applications to unleash. What does it really mean to empower "iteravely"? Quick: do you have a frictionless game plan for dealing with emerging angel investors? We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough C++. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and CSS. Our technology takes the best features of Unix and JavaScript. Do you have a plan of action to become seamless? Quick: do you have a cross-media strategy for handling new experiences? Imagine a combination of Java and AJAX. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not open-source.