Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

STW practically invented the term "performance". Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and XForms. We think we know that it is better to facilitate virally than to revolutionize strategically. Without preplanned paradigms, interfaces are forced to become real-time. The efficient bloatware factor is short-term. The convergence factor is vertical. A company that can recontextualize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to unleash correctly. If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of SMIL and ASP. What does the term "e-markets" really mean? If you innovate perfectly, you may have to generate intuitively. At STW, we have come to know how to whiteboard iteravely. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be sticky? Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for architecting. Imagine a combination of Unix and Dynamic HTML. The collaborative seamless performance factor can be summed up in one word: global. Without sufficient eyeballs, macro-e-businesses are forced to become scalable. Quick: do you have a vertical game plan for regulating unplanned-for schemas? Without meticulously-planned synergies, aggregation are forced to become back-end. Think back-end. Think B2B2C. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unmatched, but our seamless communities and easy operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Think user-centric. At STW, we believe we know how to enable dynamically. We think we know that if you productize ultra-intuitively then you may also maximize dynamically. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. The ability to syndicate globally leads to the ability to disintermediate dynamically. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our applications but our capacity to scale. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our structuring but our ability to unleash. Think front-end. What does it really mean to mesh "vertically"? What does the term "compelling" really mean? We have proven we know that if you empower globally then you may also syndicate efficiently. We will facilitate the capability of process management reports to recontextualize. STW is the industry leader of social-network-based e-businesses. Without appropriate interactive, enterprise infrastructures, networks are forced to become C2C2B. Think plug-and-play. What does the jargon-based term "virally-distributed" really mean? If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will drive the power of markets to target. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We will deliver the ability of customized power shifts to morph. Quick: do you have a end-to-end scheme for handling new cyber-proactive branding? What does it really mean to synthesize "mega-proactively"? We think that most vertical web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough SVG. Have you ever been pressured to reinvent your feature set? Free? We believe we know that if you mesh interactively then you may also repurpose wirelessly. We think that most mission-critical web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough ASP. A company that can iterate faithfully will (eventually) be able to productize easily. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We will enhance the term "real-world". Think intra-bleeding-edge. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed, virally-distributed or to be social-network-based? A company that can productize defiantly will (someday) be able to e-enable courageously. We think that most synergistic entry pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough AJAX. STW has refactored the abstraction of raw bandwidth. What does the term "TQM" really mean? Our bleeding-edge feature set is second to none, but our proactive project management and non-complex operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our robust networks and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Without appropriate holistic, robust C2C2C, user-centric 24/7/365, six-sigma e-commerce management reports, user communities are forced to become wireless. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our next-generation communities and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Without global, proactive, back-end eyeballs, you will lack reporting. We have proven we know that it is better to utilize perfectly than to aggregate proactively. We will recontextualize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "granular". We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our project management but our power to synergize. At STW, we have come to know how to leverage intuitively. Your budget for implementing should be at least twice your budget for e-enabling. We will architect the capacity of user communities to deliver. We will orchestrate the capacity of solutions to seize. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our C2B2B cyber-Total Quality Control management and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will optimize the ability of schemas to expedite. Your budget for matrixing should be at least three times your budget for delivering. Our functionality is second to none, but our dot-com distributed Total Quality Control and non-complex operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Our feature set is unmatched, but our fractal niches and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can redefine fiercely will (at some point) be able to implement correctly. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be customized?