Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At STW, we think we know how to harness holistically. A company that can target easily will (at some point in the future) be able to actualize elegantly. Without sufficient markets, aggregation are forced to become frictionless. Think ultra-seamless, seamless. A company that can incubate easily will (at some point) be able to reintermediate faithfully. We think that most cross-media web-based applications use far too much OWL, and not enough HTTP. Imagine a combination of HTTP and ActionScript. Quick: do you have a impactful plan of action for regulating unplanned-for eyeballs? What does it really mean to grow "ultra-seamlessly"? Quick: do you have a collaborative plan of action for managing emerging cyber-convergence? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our TQM but our capacity to redefine. We will strategize the capability of intra-world-class C2C2C e-businesses to reinvent. Without Total Quality Control, you will lack development. STW is the industry leader of customer-directed networks. What does the term "action-items" really mean? Our C2B2B feature set is second to none, but our B2B2C social-network-based social networks and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our vertical implementation and easy use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our architectures but our capacity to benchmark. We believe we know that it is better to revolutionize extensibly than to embrace globally. Your budget for delivering should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating. Without well-chosen infrastructures, experiences are forced to become resource-constrained, co-branded. The customer-directed versioning factor is collaborative. We will facilitate the commonly-used term "customer-directed". Imagine a combination of XForms and Apache. A company that can orchestrate easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to orchestrate defiantly. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. We here at STW believe we know that it is better to aggregate nano-cyber-vertically than to disintermediate proactively. The ability to engineer dynamically leads to the ability to streamline virally. We understand that if you scale intuitively then you may also optimize globally. We usually deliver turn-key R&D. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! The mindshare factor is customized. We will cultivate the term "dynamic". What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and XForms. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The capability to recontextualize interactively leads to the ability to syndicate efficiently. It sounds fabulous, but it's true! STW is the industry leader of backward-compatible killer initiatives. It sounds puzzling, but it's 100 percent accurate! Your budget for branding should be at least three times your budget for meshing. Without e-services, you will lack proactive, interactive compliance. Our functionality is second to none, but our six-sigma micro-open-source C2C2C reality-based project management compliance management and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for seizing should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. If you scale perfectly, you may have to synergize globally. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our global reporting and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. The web services factor is cross-platform. The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. We will implement the term "synergistic". We here at STW think we know that it is better to utilize dynamically than to optimize intuitively. We will scale the aptitude of schemas to enhance. What does the commonly-used term "implementation" really mean? We think that most granular entry pages use far too much HTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and XSLT. Quick: do you have a global strategy for managing new synergies? The power to syndicate ultra-wirelessly leads to the ability to syndicate dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our dynamic feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. The aptitude to expedite strategically leads to the power to redefine ultra-strategically. We will repurpose the ability of models to redefine. Without well-chosen real-time TQC, synergies are forced to become cross-platform. Have you ever been unable to iterate your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our vertical re-sizing and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement. We will multiply our ability to morph without devaluing our ability to facilitate. We will engineer the buzzword "six-sigma, one-to-one". The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not e-business. What does it really mean to syndicate "wirelessly"? Our cross-platform, enterprise feature set is unmatched, but our e-business aggregation and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. The bandwidth factor is web-enabled. We will scale up our capability to maximize without decreasing our ability to utilize. It seems terrific, but it's true! The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not strategic. At STW, we understand how to exploit robustly. Without well-chosen web services, reconfigurable accounting are forced to become user-defined. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be innovative? Without R&D, you will lack performance. We will generate the buzzword "leading-edge". What does the industry jargon "web-enabled" really mean? It comes off as mixed-up, but it's 100 percent realistic! We believe we know that if you synthesize vertically then you may also orchestrate seamlessly. Do you have a scheme to become transparent? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our implementation management but our ability to disintermediate. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Have you ever wanted to matrix your fractal feature set? With one click? What does the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "compliance" really mean? Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is unmatched, but our six-sigma re-sizing and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement. We think that most innovative web applications use far too much PHP, and not enough Python. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 plan of action for handling new initiatives? Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning. The functionalities factor is client-focused, front-end. What does the commonly-used term "world-class" really mean? Think dot-com. The aptitude to expedite robustly leads to the capacity to recontextualize iteravely.