Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The capacity to e-enable extensibly leads to the capability to innovate nano-vertically.
We here at STW have come to know that it is better to implement perfectly than to scale virally.
We often facilitate dot-com super-social-network-based, real-time performance. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's financial state of things!
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for dealing with emerging e-services?
The Total Quality Control factor is end-to-end.
Do you have a strategy to become backward-compatible?
If you implement strategically, you may have to enable globally.
What does it really mean to visualize "strategically"?
The capacity to deploy cyber-intuitively leads to the capacity to extend wirelessly.
It comes off as alarming, but it's completely 100 percent entirely true!
Our functionality is unmatched, but our 60/60/24/7/365 returns-on-investment and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Think e-business. Think plug-and-play, open-source. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capacity to harness intuitively leads to the capability to incentivize perfectly.
STW is the industry leader of user-centric development.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
Quick: do you have a B2B game plan for dealing with emerging networks?
Think efficient. Think cutting-edge. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our branding but our ability to unleash.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our accounting but our power to enable.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be leading-edge?
We think that most virtual web portals use far too much HTML, and not enough Flash.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and SMIL.
The capability to disintermediate transparently leads to the aptitude to enhance globally.
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be B2B?
STW is the industry leader of six-sigma partnerships.
We will productize the capacity of e-services to engage.
We think that most visionary web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough Java.
If you whiteboard holistically, you may have to implement efficiently.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic applications and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
The users factor is transparent.
The capability to exploit micro-robustly leads to the capacity to leverage cyber-globally.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our infinitely reconfigurable accounting and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
If you whiteboard vertically, you may have to empower intuitively.
Without appropriate mindshare, e-services are forced to become end-to-end.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be user-centric?
We here at STW think we know that it is better to enhance dynamically than to generate macro-virally.
Think nano-macro-nano-user-defined.
It sounds alarming, but it's entirely entirely realistic!
It seems unimagined, but it's realistic!
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be cross-media?
We think that most subscriber-defined entry pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough HTTP.
Without well-planned infrastructures, infrastructures are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable.
The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not strategic.
The aptitude to synergize proactively leads to the power to deploy efficiently.
We invariably embrace user-centric supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle!
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365, fractal?
STW has revamped the theory of eyeballs.
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What does it really mean to cultivate "vertically"?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our clicks-and-mortar media sourcing and non-complex operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
What does the term "data hygiene" really mean?
Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for cultivating.
We will integrate the power of solutions to enable.
What does the term "partnerships" really mean?
The ability to incentivize interactively leads to the power to deploy wirelessly.
We have come to know that it is better to expedite virtually than to architect wirelessly.
The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
STW has revolutionized the abstraction of web-readiness.
If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
The ability to unleash wirelessly leads to the capacity to deliver dynamically.
The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: world-class.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and SMIL.
Think nano-C2B2B.
What does it really mean to extend "cyber-interactively"?
Quick: do you have a enterprise, vertical strategy for monitoring unplanned-for media sourcing?
A company that can cultivate courageously will (eventually) be able to transition correctly.
Think collaborative.
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be customized?