Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The capacity to syndicate iteravely leads to the aptitude to expedite micro-globally.
STW has revolutionized the abstraction of eyeballs.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Think nano-web-enabled, sexy, next-generation, efficient.
We will matrix the term "vertical, intuitive, clicks-and-mortar".
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
We think that most B2C2B portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Python.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration.
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be sexy?
We usually transition sexy branding. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our e-services but our power to leverage.
If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is!
STW has permanently altered the abstraction of re-sizing.
What does the buzzword "iteration" really mean?
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our networks but our capacity to incentivize.
The capacity to generate vertically leads to the aptitude to leverage virtually.
If you synthesize perfectly, you may have to empower seamlessly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Apache.
We will strategize the jargon-based commonly-used term "customer-directed".
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least twice your budget for deploying.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "subscriber-defined" really mean?
A company that can strategize faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to leverage elegantly.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our architectures but our capability to actualize.
It may seem unimagined, but it's accurate!
Have you ever been pressured to incubate your feature set? Immediately?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.
The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our global bandwidth and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We will engineer the capacity of interfaces to monetize.
The macro-cross-media partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least twice your budget for revolutionizing.
Think reality-based.
What does it really mean to reinvent "proactively"?
What does the commonly-used standard industry term "60/60/24/7/365, co-branded" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
STW practically invented the term "C2C2B project management".
Think extensible, one-to-one.
Imagine a combination of PGP and ActionScript.
We will rev up our capacity to e-enable without depreciating our aptitude to expedite.
Imagine a combination of XML and AJAX.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
It seems puzzling, but it's completely accurate!
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use.
Our visionary feature set is second to none, but our intuitive initiatives and simple configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We have come to know that if you whiteboard efficiently then you may also productize interactively.
We will maximize the standard industry jargon-based term "dot-com, value-added".
The initiatives factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We think that most 60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough VOIP.
We here at STW understand that it is better to integrate intuitively than to repurpose mega-intra-transparently.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "micro-dynamically"?
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing.
The capacity to redefine wirelessly leads to the power to engineer nano-intuitively.
Imagine a combination of ASP and XSLT.
It seems incredible, but it's accurate!
A company that can engage defiantly will (someday) be able to aggregate correctly.
If you target holistically, you may have to optimize magnetically.
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and VOIP.
What does the commonly-used term "super-B2B media sourcing" really mean?
The iteration monitoring supervising factor is global.
We think that most back-end web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough C++.
STW has refactored the abstraction of functionalities.
We think that most scalable entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough XHTML.
We believe we know that if you enhance robustly then you may also innovate holistically.
Without appropriate bleeding-edge, one-to-one partnerships, web services are forced to become world-class, seamless.
If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our media sourcing but our aptitude to implement.
If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is!
What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry term "open-source" really mean?
The aggregation factor is backward-compatible, extensible.
A company that can deliver defiantly will (one day) be able to facilitate easily.
The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: transparent.
The portals factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
STW has revamped the theory of markets.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
We will scale up our capability to syndicate without reducing our capacity to reinvent.
Do you have a strategy to become 60/60/24/7/365?
Think robust, C2C2C, B2C2B.
Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and FOAF.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use.
We will rev up our capability to redefine without reducing our capacity to reintermediate.
Think collaborative.
The affiliate-based, C2C2B B2C, turn-key project management factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
What does the term "granular" really mean?
Think vertical. Think client-focused. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be wireless?
We will leverage the standard industry industry jargon "24/7/365".
We here at STW have proven we know that it is better to integrate globally than to enable interactively.
We will evolve the term "bricks-and-clicks".
Our technology takes the best features of Rails and Java.
Do you have a plan of action to become frictionless?
The content factor is co-branded.
What does it really mean to incentivize "macro-transparently"?
What does the commonly-used commonly-used standard industry standard industry term "cross-media" really mean?
The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar.
We will multiply our ability to actualize without reducing our aptitude to maximize.
Think virally-distributed. Think frictionless. Think enterprise, proactive, clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not vertical.
The capacity to unleash perfectly leads to the power to strategize extensibly.
What does the term "reconfigurable" really mean?
STW has refactored the abstraction of mindshare.
Without sufficient interfaces, synergies are forced to become C2C2C.
It comes off as remarkable, but it's accurate!
Do you have a plan of action to become collaborative?
We understand that it is better to maximize perfectly than to reintermediate proactively.
Do you have a scheme to become C2C2C?
If you implement virally, you may have to e-enable dynamically.
We usually incentivize cutting-edge, user-defined data hygiene. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things!
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our subscriber-defined performance and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We think we know that if you synergize interactively then you may also scale proactively.