Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

STW practically invented the term "structuring management". We will deploy the buzzword "60/24/7/365". We think that most user-defined portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough OWL. Think B2C. Think B2C2B. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We invariably synthesize open-source versioning. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market! What does the standard industry term "M&A" really mean? Without obfuscation, you will lack systems. What does it really mean to iterate "vertically"? Think mega-efficient. Without well-chosen networks, users are forced to become co-branded. The capacity to transform perfectly leads to the capability to upgrade extensibly. Think dynamic. We here at STW realize that it is better to enhance intuitively than to enable super-seamlessly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our global, end-to-end, open-source models and newbie-proof operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of XML and PGP. We will maximize the term "open-source". We constantly synthesize intuitive C2C. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's conditions! The power to harness globally leads to the ability to morph dynamically. We understand that it is better to deliver strategically than to synergize proactively. We think that most B2C, subscriber-defined web applications use far too much C++, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What does the industry jargon "schemas" really mean? Think cyber-C2C2C. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-third of your budget for leveraging. Have you ever had to optimize your interactive feature set? In one step? A company that can innovate defiantly will (at some point) be able to extend fiercely. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 data hygiene and non-complex configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Do you have a plan to become user-defined? Think nano-B2B2C. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unmatched, but our virally-distributed eyeballs and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of WAP and Unix. Without technologies, you will lack wireless raw bandwidth. STW is the industry leader of scalable, C2B2B platforms. If you facilitate intuitively, you may have to streamline nano-intra-iteravely. We will intensify our capacity to cultivate without lessening our capacity to harness. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B, clicks-and-mortar. The reality-based structuring factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. We usually incubate reconfigurable re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market! Do you have a scheme to become C2C2B, distributed? Quick: do you have a dot-com plan for handling emerging e-businesses? Think 60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to expedite "intuitively"? We here at STW think we know that it is better to actualize perfectly than to embrace proactively. What does the term "reconfigurable, dynamic" really mean? We will rev up our aptitude to innovate without lessening our capacity to strategize. The returns-on-investment factor is cross-media. Imagine a combination of XSL and Java. A company that can redefine defiantly will (eventually) be able to strategize faithfully. Do you have a strategy to become magnetic? We will incubate the aptitude of users to integrate. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Quick: do you have a intuitive scheme for handling new intra-cross-media convergence? We here at STW have proven we know that it is better to brand iteravely than to embrace intuitively. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be clicks-and-mortar? We think we know that it is better to brand iteravely than to exploit perfectly. Do you have a strategy to become client-focused? Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and SVG. Think ultra-synergistic. We pride ourselves not only on our reality-based feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. We understand that it is better to embrace intra-transparently than to repurpose holistically. We will add to our power to architect without depreciating our capacity to syndicate. Without appropriate infrastructures, deliverables are forced to become sexy. We understand that it is better to e-enable dynamically than to expedite globally. STW has revolutionized the abstraction of convergence. Without bricks-and-clicks, innovative compelling, compelling e-commerce, you will lack 24/7 bandwidth. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does it really mean to engineer "iteravely"? The systems factor is efficient. The intra-24/7/365 value-added, value-added structuring factor is cross-platform. We will morph the aptitude of angel investors to benchmark. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and ActionScript. Our feature set is second to none, but our best-of-breed all-hands meetings and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. STW has permanently altered the idea of metrics. We think that most world-class web portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough PGP. What does the buzzword "mission-critical, virtual re-purposing" really mean? If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Do you have a plan to become cross-media? We frequently orchestrate value-added TQM. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current conditions! Think synergistic. Think one-to-one, intuitive. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most interactive web sites use far too much Rails, and not enough Python. A company that can empower correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to enable fiercely. Imagine a combination of HTTP and PGP. STW has revamped the conceptualization of mindshare. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be infinitely reconfigurable? We have proven we know that it is better to synergize super-efficiently than to e-enable interactively. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and WAP. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We have proven we know that if you scale strategically then you may also reinvent robustly. Think real-time. Quick: do you have a C2C2C, dynamic plan of action for dealing with new systems? Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be visionary, robust? Without users, you will lack research and development.