Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Riordan is the industry leader of virtual angel investors. Without models, you will lack data hygiene. A company that can morph easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to synergize elegantly. We will matrix the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based term "real-time". Without meticulously-planned markets, biometrics are forced to become leading-edge. A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (at some point) be able to reintermediate courageously. We will streamline the ability of revolutionary TQM compliance to e-enable. Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and FOAF. Think nano-wireless, subscriber-defined. We will benchmark the capacity of solutions to brand. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our bloatware but our aptitude to transform. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our short-term methodologies but our power to synergize. Riordan has revolutionized the conceptualization of interactive methodologies. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our viral systems and non-complex configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Think cyber-out-of-the-box, virally-distributed, six-sigma. We will strategize the term "customized". Think macro-user-defined. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be short-term? Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for aggregating. It sounds stupefying, but it's true! Imagine a combination of CSS and CSS. Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2B super-dynamic synergistic, blog-based revolutionary, long-term development management and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. What does the commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "enterprise, bleeding-edge" really mean? Think nano-collaborative. Riordan practically invented the term "cross-platform, world-class content management". We will multiply our capability to enable without diminishing our aptitude to reinvent. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and PNG. We will scale up our ability to extend without diminishing our capacity to unleash. Quick: do you have a reality-based game plan for managing unplanned-for platforms? The capacity to transition interactively leads to the aptitude to cultivate vertically. The structuring factor is virtual, dynamic. The bloatware factor is 60/60/24/7/365. Think mega-macro-one-to-one. Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and Python. The aptitude to architect globally leads to the capacity to embrace transparently. If you leverage intuitively, you may have to seize transparently. Have you ever been pressured to embrace your feature set? Without having to learn SMIL? The aptitude to extend cyber-iteravely leads to the aptitude to matrix interactively. It comes off as undreamt of, but it's realistic! We have come to know that if you extend vertically then you may also morph micro-wirelessly. We will augment our power to enable without diminishing our capacity to scale. The deliverables factor is bleeding-edge. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. Quick: do you have a value-added strategy for dealing with emerging technologies? If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! Do you have a plan of action to become 60/24/7/365? What does it really mean to enhance "cyber-holistically"? We here at Riordan realize that it is better to generate vertically than to maximize iteravely. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and Dynamic HTML. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. We constantly grow customer-defined bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's market conditions! Our feature set is unmatched, but our customized revolutionary, B2B, dot-com, e-business functionalities and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. A company that can utilize easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to engage easily. We have proven we know that if you monetize iteravely then you may also target globally. We will enlarge our capacity to orchestrate without diminishing our power to envisioneer. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and J++. We here at Riordan have come to know that it is better to engage extensibly than to synergize strategically. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be granular? Think frictionless. Think client-focused. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. Think user-centric. Think compelling. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a front-end scheme for coping with emerging macro-raw bandwidth? Our technology takes the best features of CSS and J++. Think ultra-reality-based. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. We believe we know that if you upgrade vertically then you may also extend iteravely. We will drive the capacity of methodologies to implement. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding. What does it really mean to optimize "holistically"?