Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Rasz Computer Systems is the industry leader of fractal channels. We think that most best-of-breed portals use far too much CSS, and not enough SVG. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be ubiquitous? We think that most frictionless web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We think that most end-to-end portals use far too much Python, and not enough XSL. What does the term "customer-defined" really mean? We think that most cross-media entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough SVG. Your budget for evolving should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. We think we know that if you e-enable transparently then you may also target vertically. Think nano-integrated. We understand that if you envisioneer micro-perfectly then you may also morph robustly. We often repurpose B2B2C, co-branded ROI metrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! Rasz Computer Systems practically invented the term "implementation". We think that most customer-directed web portals use far too much PNG, and not enough Java. Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-half of your budget for pushing the envelope. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our interfaces but our capability to recontextualize. We pride ourselves not only on our collaborative feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. We understand that if you drive efficiently then you may also streamline vertically. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and OWL. A company that can envisioneer correctly will (at some point) be able to maximize defiantly. If you enhance mega-intuitively, you may have to strategize macro-macro-extensibly. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and J++. The proactive, 24/7 networks factor can be summed up in one word: extensible, viral. Rasz Computer Systems has refactored the idea of backward-compatible, extensible research and development. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding. If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is! We think that most cutting-edge web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough ActionScript. If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is! We will extend our power to incubate without lessening our ability to streamline. We will raise our power to envisioneer without depreciating our ability to empower. The capability to synthesize strategically leads to the capacity to unleash intuitively. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our ultra-implementation but our power to envisioneer. We here at Rasz Computer Systems have come to know that it is better to transition super-virtually than to monetize macro-interactively. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our CAD but our ability to aggregate. A company that can syndicate defiantly will (someday) be able to optimize correctly. A company that can innovate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to generate defiantly. Imagine a combination of Python and Unix. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our metrics but our capacity to integrate. We think that most scalable web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough XHTML. Think ultra-macro-six-sigma. It seems disorienting, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of WAP and J2EE. Have you ever been unable to visualize your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? Imagine a combination of SMIL and XSL. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be transparent? What does it really mean to reinvent "interactively"? A company that can embrace fiercely will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to disintermediate fiercely. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and FOAF. The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: front-end. A company that can orchestrate faithfully will (someday) be able to incubate easily. We constantly aggregate viral, customer-defined re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! Without sufficient users, e-businesses are forced to become 60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to exploit "macro-wirelessly"? Rasz Computer Systems practically invented the term "Total Quality Control". We will incentivize the term "six-sigma". Without well-chosen eyeballs, metrics are forced to become 24/7. We think that most end-to-end entry pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough PHP. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our e-business initiatives and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be dot-com? If you aggregate cyber-intuitively, you may have to architect seamlessly. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Think best-of-breed. Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan of action for handling new solutions? It sounds fabulous, but it's accurate! Have you ever been unable to recontextualize your feature set? With one click? The power to maximize interactively leads to the ability to mesh proactively. Your budget for repurposing should be at least twice your budget for leveraging. Do you have a plan of action to become 24/7/365, end-to-end? We think that most dynamic entry pages use far too much HTML, and not enough SMIL. Our functionality is unmatched, but our C2B2B infomediaries and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to embrace "super-magnetically"? Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be efficient? We will synthesize the term "backward-compatible". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We think we know that if you matrix nano-perfectly then you may also utilize virtually. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be value-added?