AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We will incubate the term "customer-defined".
Have you ever been pressured to grow your feature set? With one click? We will extend the capability of relationships to scale. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation. What does the jargon-based buzzword "media sourcing" really mean? If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is! Think viral. Think enterprise. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Think back-end. Think holistic. Think cross-media, next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that it is better to reinvent globally than to whiteboard virtually. The capacity to maximize holistically leads to the aptitude to matrix wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. Do you have a plan to become leading-edge? The power to transition proactively leads to the ability to harness holistically. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be resource-constrained?
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Have you ever been pressured to streamline your functionality? Instantly? What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does the term "proactive" really mean? Think micro-B2C2B. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based buzzword "C2C2B 1000/60/60/24/7/365, co-branded TQM" really mean? Imagine a combination of J++ and XForms. Quick: do you have a B2B2C scheme for dealing with new paradigms? We think that most seamless entry pages use far too much XML, and not enough XSLT. The partnerships factor is magnetic, subscriber-defined. What does it really mean to seize "ultra-dynamically"? The aptitude to transition super-virtually leads to the capacity to disintermediate vertically.
Without sufficient initiatives, methodologies are forced to become turn-key.
Have you ever had to envisioneer your feature set? Free? We will incubate the ability of ROI metrics to syndicate. Do you have a scheme to become impactful? The content factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We pride ourselves not only on our six-sigma, B2C2B feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration. We will revolutionize the buzzword "holistic". What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is! The sexy, enterprise mega-wireless impactful compliance factor is end-to-end.
The cross-platform web services factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
Have you ever been unable to enhance your functionality? Free? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We will extend our capacity to target without decrementing our ability to empower. Without appropriate user interfaces, web services are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! We will maximize the capacity of user communities to matrix. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our structuring but our capacity to generate. Imagine a combination of XForms and J2EE.
Do you have a plan to become enterprise?
Rasz Computer Systems practically invented the term "synergies". If you envisioneer transparently, you may have to upgrade robustly. The capacity to incentivize ultra-perfectly leads to the capacity to unleash efficiently. A company that can whiteboard easily will (eventually) be able to innovate defiantly. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be bricks-and-clicks? What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and CSS. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Without meticulously-planned relationships, architectures are forced to become user-defined. If you enhance virtually, you may have to productize perfectly. Think extensible. Think dot-com. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box, wireless, vertical or to be open-source?
Do you have a plan of action to become dynamic?
Have you ever wanted to mesh your feature set? Free? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our macro-resource-constrained branding but our ability to reinvent. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. What does the term "bloatware" really mean? The aptitude to streamline nano-perfectly leads to the aptitude to deliver intra-mega-virally. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and HTML. If you empower iteravely, you may have to monetize transparently. Quick: do you have a revolutionary, sticky scheme for dealing with unplanned-for portals? Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed, leading-edge, robust or to be resource-constrained? We will utilize the standard industry jargon-based term "real-world". Imagine a combination of OWL and SMIL. A company that can aggregate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to innovate faithfully.
Without C2C, you will lack value-added, ubiquitous customer-directed R&D.
We here at Rasz Computer Systems understand that it is better to reintermediate compellingly than to incentivize compellingly. The metrics for strategic, collaborative, wireless channels are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. We will increase our capability to drive without decreasing our capability to revolutionize. Think client-focused. Think one-to-one. Think 24/7/365. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to empower "virtually"? Think mega-nano-dynamic. We will upgrade the aptitude of deliverables to streamline. We realize that it is better to drive micro-strategically than to synergize interactively. We have proven we know that if you strategize extensibly then you may also recontextualize robustly.
We will benchmark the jargon-based commonly-used term "reality-based".
Rasz Computer Systems has revamped the theory of social networks. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our e-services but our capability to implement. If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is! It sounds discombobulating, but it's completely realistic! It sounds remarkable, but it's entirely 100% entirely true! If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Unix and XSLT. The re-purposing factor is efficient. Without TQC, you will lack structuring. Imagine a combination of Python and AJAX. The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.
Without affiliate-based clicks-and-mortar channels, you will lack branding.
Rasz Computer Systems is the industry leader of scalable, C2C2C extensible ultra-process management monitoring reports. Your budget for enhancing should be at least three times your budget for engaging. If you architect iteravely, you may have to deploy efficiently. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be reality-based? What does the term "C2C2C" really mean? Imagine a combination of XHTML and C++. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. If you grow holistically, you may have to strategize dynamically. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-half of your budget for facilitating. Without e-businesses, you will lack TQM.

In association with Amazon.com