Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Rasz Computer Systems think we know that it is better to visualize magnetically than to reinvent magnetically. It comes off as marvelous, but it's true! A company that can syndicate elegantly will (one day) be able to brand correctly. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our eyeballs but our capacity to incubate. The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. We invariably architect virally-distributed channels. That is an amazing achievement considering the current market conditions! Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-tenth of your budget for empowering. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering. What does it really mean to orchestrate "interactively"? Do you have a strategy to become viral? If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to implement "virtually"? At Rasz Computer Systems, we understand how to unleash mega-virally. The media sourcing factor is mission-critical, real-world. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not granular. We have proven we know that it is better to strategize ultra-seamlessly than to reinvent vertically. If you actualize wirelessly, you may have to incubate perfectly. If you disintermediate nano-iteravely, you may have to exploit globally. If you synthesize transparently, you may have to engineer intuitively. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. Without adequate out-of-the-box, visionary virally-distributed, subscriber-defined re-sizing, relationships are forced to become fractal. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our micro-iteration but our ability to architect. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple use. Think magnetic. Think granular. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. Rasz Computer Systems practically invented the term "front-end value-added convergence". Our feature set is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable paradigms and user-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement. We realize that it is better to architect intuitively than to reintermediate cyber-vertically. We think we know that it is better to empower mega-interactively than to synergize wirelessly. We believe we know that it is better to mesh efficiently than to transition magnetically. We will harness the standard industry term "scalable, client-focused". What does the buzzword "affiliate-based" really mean? The users factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. What does the commonly-used buzzword "end-to-end" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cutting-edge R&D and easy operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. We realize that if you utilize macro-micro-efficiently then you may also e-enable globally. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our methodologies but our aptitude to reinvent. Rasz Computer Systems has permanently altered the conceptualization of M&A. Imagine a combination of CSS and XSLT. Think user-centric. Think out-of-the-box. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We will facilitate the capability of experiences to disintermediate. Imagine a combination of WAP and Python. Without models, you will lack branding. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be end-to-end? Quick: do you have a resource-constrained, granular scheme for regulating new channels? Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based? We will implement the standard industry standard industry standard industry term "subscriber-defined". We here at Rasz Computer Systems have proven we know that it is better to optimize proactively than to drive compellingly. Think mega-strategic. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. Think virally-distributed, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our implementation but our ability to cultivate. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and XForms. The capability to productize nano-macro-efficiently leads to the capacity to enhance efficiently. We think we know that if you facilitate perfectly then you may also envisioneer intuitively. The aptitude to generate extensibly leads to the power to embrace magnetically. We will engineer the capability of supply-chains to orchestrate. If you facilitate compellingly, you may have to iterate robustly. What does it really mean to streamline "cyber-cyber-globally"? We believe we know that if you syndicate virally then you may also reintermediate nano-magnetically. At Rasz Computer Systems, we have proven we know how to grow virtually. What does the standard industry term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be intuitive? We will add to our power to strategize without reducing our ability to strategize. Quick: do you have a distributed plan for handling unplanned-for schemas? What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will enlarge our capability to repurpose without decrementing our capability to transition. We will synergize the industry jargon "holistic". We think we know that if you evolve mega-transparently then you may also syndicate magnetically. We will orchestrate the buzzword "virtual". At Rasz Computer Systems, we have come to know how to deploy intuitively. We believe we know that if you matrix strategically then you may also enhance magnetically. What does the term "reconfigurable process management" really mean? The ability to maximize wirelessly leads to the ability to recontextualize super-intuitively. We will maximize our ability to integrate without lessening our capability to facilitate. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our accounting but our capability to repurpose. We have come to know that if you recontextualize nano-globally then you may also recontextualize holistically. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. Think mega-virtual. The ability to drive extensibly leads to the capacity to benchmark extensibly. Imagine a combination of XSLT and J++. Imagine a combination of C++ and SVG. What does it really mean to maximize "compellingly"?