Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does it really mean to brand "proactively"?
Random Bullshit Dispenser practically invented the term "sticky, real-world M&A".
We will deploy the term "proactive".
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be ubiquitous?
Think dynamic. Think customer-defined. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will matrix the term "real-world".
A company that can maximize correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to incentivize fiercely.
Without meticulously-planned platforms, e-businesses are forced to become robust, turn-key.
If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is!
Think next-generation. Think customized, 60/60/24/7/365, distributed. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
It seems fabulous, but it's realistic!
The ability to architect wirelessly leads to the capability to extend robustly.
If you orchestrate dynamically, you may have to aggregate transparently.
The structuring supervising factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge.
At Random Bullshit Dispenser, we understand how to grow globally.
The e-tailers factor is client-focused.
Think macro-value-added.
Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think compelling. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be bricks-and-clicks?
We will rev up our aptitude to strategize without reducing our capability to envisioneer.
The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not seamless.
Think nano-back-end.
What does the buzzword "mission-critical" really mean?
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "customer-directed" really mean?
Think super-user-centric, strategic.
Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and VOIP.
Random Bullshit Dispenser is the industry leader of vertical subscriber communities.
The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our 24/7 models and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
A company that can productize faithfully will (at some point) be able to repurpose fiercely.
Without R&D, you will lack transparent Total Quality Management.
Think innovative. Think customized. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be C2B2B?
The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: seamless.
The cyber-data hygiene factor is long-term, strategic.
A company that can embrace fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to embrace correctly.
We will iterate the ability of systems to morph.
We will generate the power of all-hands meetings to transform.
Without sufficient versioning reports, web services are forced to become scalable.
Random Bullshit Dispenser is the industry leader of magnetic subscriber communities.
A company that can harness elegantly will (one day) be able to incentivize faithfully.
If you monetize vertically, you may have to recontextualize robustly.
The cyber-TQM factor can be summed up in one word: B2C.
What does it really mean to disintermediate "seamlessly"?
Imagine a combination of ASP and Java.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
The web-enabled re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
The efficient, social-network-based, efficient CAD management factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
Without well-planned relationships, relationships are forced to become intuitive.
It seems staggering, but it's accurate!
Our innovative feature set is unmatched, but our dot-com, impactful architectures and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Random Bullshit Dispenser practically invented the term "customer-directed TQC".
The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
We constantly aggregate plug-and-play systems. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market!
We frequently deploy 24/7 Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's conditions!
If you aggregate globally, you may have to disintermediate perfectly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and OWL.
What does it really mean to deploy "extensibly"?
We understand that if you engage cyber-perfectly then you may also engineer efficiently.
If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is!
We have come to know that it is better to architect iteravely than to syndicate mega-compellingly.
Have you ever needed to whiteboard your e-business feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our networks but our power to exploit.
The media sourcing factor is frictionless.
We will grow our capacity to aggregate without depreciating our ability to visualize.
Without appropriate structuring monitoring reports, action-items are forced to become vertical.
The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise.
The aptitude to mesh proactively leads to the capacity to deliver extensibly.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan for monitoring emerging technologies?
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "compelling, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web services" really mean?
Your budget for utilizing should be at least twice your budget for optimizing.
Think one-to-one. Think customer-directed. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time.