Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be scalable?
Random Bullshit Dispenser is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 branding.
We will implement the commonly-used term "virtual, C2B2B".
We will syndicate the power of web-readiness to upgrade.
Imagine a combination of Apache and FOAF.
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
We will grow our capacity to iterate without diminishing our power to incentivize.
We understand that it is better to strategize efficiently than to brand intra-intuitively.
We believe we know that it is better to disintermediate dynamically than to repurpose efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be global or to be one-to-one?
If you architect transparently, you may have to facilitate robustly.
Imagine a combination of DOM and VOIP.
The project management factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box.
We will maximize the term "proactive".
Random Bullshit Dispenser has revolutionized the concept of functionalities.
Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be virtual?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 60/60/24/7/365 paradigms and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Imagine a combination of PNG and XML.
Without well-planned web services, infomediaries are forced to become holistic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and XForms.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling.
We will scale the capacity of user-defined, B2B process management to morph.
Think dynamic, cutting-edge.
We will reinvent the capacity of infinitely reconfigurable long-term project management to visualize.
We understand that it is better to monetize iteravely than to upgrade vertically.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our out-of-the-box eyeballs and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
Random Bullshit Dispenser has revolutionized the idea of media sourcing.
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be sticky?
We understand that if you recontextualize intuitively then you may also redefine proactively.
Without adequate e-businesses, bandwidth reports are forced to become reconfigurable.
What does the buzzword "infrastructures" really mean?
The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based.
Think super-1000/60/60/24/7/365.
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We think that most real-world, collaborative, value-added entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough C++.
We believe we know that if you engage virally then you may also upgrade virally.
Random Bullshit Dispenser has permanently altered the conceptualization of M&A.
We realize that if you innovate transparently then you may also transition perfectly.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Imagine a combination of OWL and C++.
A company that can repurpose easily will (at some point) be able to brand faithfully.
We invariably envisioneer distributed out-of-the-box iteration. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
We usually optimize cross-platform turn-key CAE. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle!
Quick: do you have a B2C2B game plan for dealing with emerging initiatives?
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We will deploy the aptitude of e-markets to maximize.
We will reintermediate the buzzword "subscriber-defined".
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be mission-critical?
We will increase our capacity to cultivate without devaluing our capacity to iterate.
We will evolve the aptitude of niches to repurpose.
At Random Bullshit Dispenser, we have come to know how to generate efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
The development management factor is cutting-edge.
What does it really mean to morph "wirelessly"?
Think subscriber-defined. Think B2C, intuitive. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without well-planned distributed bandwidth, web services are forced to become proactive.
Think innovative.
We constantly visualize innovative media sourcing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
The ability to facilitate strategically leads to the capacity to monetize mega-intuitively.
Without well-chosen models, partnerships are forced to become real-time, extensible.
We here at Random Bullshit Dispenser realize that it is better to aggregate magnetically than to streamline robustly.
Without meticulously-planned scalable co-branded, 60/60/24/7/365, real-world partnerships, platforms are forced to become user-centric.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "perfectly"?
If you e-enable virtually, you may have to reinvent virally.
We invariably syndicate short-term development. That is a terrific achievement considering today's conditions!
We frequently transform holistic development. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's cycle!
We think that most clicks-and-mortar portals use far too much Rails, and not enough PGP.
We will augment our capacity to engineer without decreasing our capacity to maximize.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and HTTP.
The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
Quick: do you have a impactful strategy for monitoring unplanned-for macro-mega-compliance reports?
If you reintermediate virtually, you may have to incubate iteravely.
The power to syndicate nano-virally leads to the capacity to reintermediate globally.
Without adequate angel investors, super-macro-60/60/24/7/365 frictionless accounting are forced to become sexy.
Random Bullshit Dispenser is the industry leader of client-focused, clicks-and-mortar, front-end super-resource-constrained Total Quality Management.
We often generate end-to-end structuring metrics. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's cycle!
Think dynamic. Think synergistic. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think compelling.
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Think super-B2B2C.
We will upgrade the capacity of experiences to mesh.
If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be real-time?
We often reinvent social-network-based best-of-breed, user-defined versioning. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current conditions!
We have proven we know that if you benchmark dynamically then you may also generate wirelessly.
Have you ever been unable to generate your feature set? In one step?
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be global?
Think backward-compatible, out-of-the-box. Think compelling, clicks-and-mortar, C2C2B. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without preplanned systems, infrastructures are forced to become wireless.
We will multiply our capacity to innovate without decrementing our capacity to expedite.
We understand that it is better to aggregate magnetically than to aggregate intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be B2C?
We have proven we know that it is better to unleash wirelessly than to maximize intra-efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be value-added?
Think B2B.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be mission-critical?
Think super-cutting-edge.
We always extend user-centric media sourcing. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions!
At Random Bullshit Dispenser, we believe we know how to recontextualize mega-strategically.
The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: interactive.
A company that can morph elegantly will (at some point) be able to mesh defiantly.
We will scale up our aptitude to synthesize without lessening our capability to upgrade.
Think mission-critical.
We frequently redefine real-world customized bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
Without well-planned networks, schemas are forced to become impactful.
If you embrace virtually, you may have to upgrade holistically.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be one-to-one?
Think affiliate-based. Think open-source. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "sexy, affiliate-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, 60/60/24/7/365 dot-com bleeding-edge, turn-key CAE" really mean?