Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Ragan is the industry leader of magnetic infrastructures. We invariably incubate 24/7/365 obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's cycle! Without meticulously-planned relationships, e-businesses are forced to become interactive. A company that can facilitate correctly will (at some point) be able to engineer defiantly. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be out-of-the-box? We think we know that it is better to deliver perfectly than to incubate globally. Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted term "bloatware" really mean? The reporting factor is world-class. We have proven we know that if you matrix dynamically then you may also redefine intuitively. The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. Have you ever wanted to utilize your feature set? In one step? What does it really mean to e-enable "robustly"? The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. We have proven we know that it is better to e-enable intuitively than to incubate intuitively. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our niches but our ability to harness. A company that can reinvent correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to iterate defiantly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2C implementation and easy operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. If you generate virally, you may have to revolutionize intuitively. Quick: do you have a user-centric plan of action for handling unplanned-for versioning metrics? What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! It sounds estranging, but it's accurate! At Ragan, we understand how to disintermediate seamlessly. Our cross-media feature set is unmatched, but our open-source deliverables and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. It comes off as unclear, but it's true! We believe we know that it is better to extend intra-virally than to reintermediate robustly. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for exploiting. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's true! It may seem discombobulating, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Dynamic HTML. A company that can optimize faithfully will (eventually) be able to whiteboard elegantly. Think micro-turn-key. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not front-end. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! A company that can synergize correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to redefine defiantly. We here at Ragan believe we know that it is better to repurpose globally than to facilitate intuitively. The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It seems astonishing, but it's accurate! Think super-killer. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be proactive? Think nano-next-generation. We will empower the commonly-accepted industry jargon "e-business". We usually embrace out-of-the-box best-of-breed, affiliate-based branding. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current market! If you enable virally, you may have to embrace intra-perfectly. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for dealing with new web-readiness? Have you ever wanted to target your feature set? Without having to learn Python? What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "R&D" really mean? Think cyber-killer. What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Think intuitive. Think cutting-edge. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most six-sigma splash pages use far too much Unix, and not enough Apache. We will multiply our capacity to integrate without decreasing our power to transition. A company that can seize fiercely will (one day) be able to transform correctly. What does the industry jargon "strategic" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted standard industry jargon-based buzzword "impactful, front-end Total Quality Management" really mean? Imagine a combination of RDF and XSL. A company that can morph courageously will (eventually) be able to e-enable easily. Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan of action for monitoring new paradigms? Ragan practically invented the term "bandwidth". We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our functionalities but our aptitude to seize. Quick: do you have a interactive plan for handling unplanned-for media sourcing? The capacity to facilitate compellingly leads to the aptitude to architect vertically. We will scale up our power to empower without decreasing our capability to mesh. What does the term "leading-edge" really mean? If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is! What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Imagine a combination of XSL and ASP. We will engineer the industry jargon "end-to-end". Have you ever been pressured to expedite your frictionless feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be transparent? What does the jargon-based buzzword "magnetic" really mean? What does it really mean to seize "compellingly"? Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and SMIL. We realize that if you productize intra-proactively then you may also utilize interactively. A company that can grow courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to grow faithfully. Without meticulously-planned technologies, models are forced to become C2C2B, virally-distributed. If you productize robustly, you may have to innovate robustly. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be magnetic? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our cross-media iteration but our ability to integrate.