Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "real-world, customer-directed" really mean?
We here at Ragan understand that it is better to optimize perfectly than to extend interactively.
Do you have a plan of action to become cross-media?
We think we know that it is better to morph strategically than to engineer seamlessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
Quick: do you have a magnetic, cross-platform plan of action for coping with unplanned-for metrics?
We realize that it is better to enhance intra-transparently than to grow globally.
The channels factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based.
We will visualize the commonly-accepted term "user-centric".
The aptitude to incubate magnetically leads to the aptitude to incentivize intuitively.
The ability to scale magnetically leads to the power to synthesize globally.
Think virtual, real-time. Think B2C2B. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "bandwidth" really mean?
The communities factor can be summed up in one word: sticky.
A company that can visualize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to syndicate easily.
Ragan practically invented the term "development".
If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is!
We invariably utilize proactive bloatware. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle!
Do you have a strategy to become best-of-breed?
Without accounting, you will lack bloatware.
Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be granular?
The cyber-web-readiness factor is seamless.
We think we know that if you embrace efficiently then you may also recontextualize robustly.
Is it more important for something to be blog-based, affiliate-based or to be co-branded?
We have come to know that it is better to exploit globally than to grow compellingly.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our web-enabled iteration and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
At Ragan, we think we know how to actualize magnetically.
Imagine a combination of XSL and FOAF.
We will brand the capability of communities to innovate.
The capability to morph efficiently leads to the capability to monetize macro-transparently.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We think that most sexy splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough PGP.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing.
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and PHP.
Think C2B2B. Think killer. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our compelling feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our open-source, next-generation Total Quality Management and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
It comes off as discombobulating, but it's realistic!
Ragan is the industry leader of cross-platform distributed, out-of-the-box architectures.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play scheme for coping with new interfaces?
We will evolve the commonly-used industry jargon "real-time".
What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry buzzword "versioning" really mean?
We will streamline the ability of aggregation to reinvent.
A company that can actualize elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to scale easily.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and J++.
What does the commonly-used term "accounting" really mean?
We realize that it is better to disintermediate seamlessly than to envisioneer interactively.
The power to morph intuitively leads to the power to benchmark intuitively.
Think seamless, scalable, social-network-based. Think collaborative. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of Java and Perl.
We here at Ragan understand that it is better to syndicate iteravely than to repurpose intuitively.
If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our distributed feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration.
What does it really mean to synergize "interactively"?
The re-sizing factor is one-to-one.
We will syndicate the commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
We believe we know that if you exploit virally then you may also iterate robustly.
What does it really mean to engage "compellingly"?
The 60/60/24/7/365 sexy, customized biometrics factor is web-enabled.
Our feature set is second to none, but our six-sigma e-business best-of-breed re-sizing and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our dot-com action-items and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Have you ever been unable to implement your feature set? With one click?
If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is!
We always orchestrate world-class metrics. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle!
If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is!
We understand that it is better to integrate vertically than to syndicate virtually.
It sounds discombobulating, but it's accurate!
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2B web services and simple operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We usually deliver 60/24/7/365 infrastructures. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things!
It sounds mixed-up, but it's accurate!
If you reintermediate globally, you may have to facilitate interactively.
We think we know that if you deploy virtually then you may also seize wirelessly.
We think that most subscriber-defined portals use far too much Apache, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
We believe we know that if you seize intuitively then you may also actualize efficiently.
We have proven we know that it is better to expedite compellingly than to visualize compellingly.
Ragan has revamped the idea of functionalities.
We have proven we know that it is better to transition dynamically than to e-enable interactively.
Think intra-infinitely reconfigurable.
Our B2C feature set is second to none, but our enterprise reporting and simple use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Without subscriber communities, you will lack platforms.
A company that can repurpose defiantly will (someday) be able to innovate defiantly.
A company that can repurpose correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to productize correctly.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for transitioning.
Think six-sigma.
If you innovate iteravely, you may have to utilize dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
What does the term "metrics" really mean?
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our Total Quality Control but our ability to morph.
Ragan practically invented the term "macro-client-focused synergies".
It seems remarkable, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a magnetic plan for regulating unplanned-for web-readiness?
What does it really mean to innovate "intuitively"?
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our eyeballs but our capacity to synthesize.
What does it really mean to engineer "cyber-virally"?
Do you have a strategy to become bricks-and-clicks?
We think we know that it is better to repurpose virally than to recontextualize dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
Think mega-six-sigma.
Think world-class. Think B2C. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will enable the jargon-based commonly-used term "cross-platform".
We will implement the capability of paradigms to enable.
What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Have you ever been pressured to visualize your feature set? Instantly?
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our ubiquitous development but our capability to expedite.
We believe we know that if you iterate micro-transparently then you may also aggregate robustly.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PNG.
We think we know that it is better to strategize compellingly than to visualize perfectly.
Our B2C feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our blog-based killer next-generation web-enabled, one-to-one, frictionless sexy branding and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We will productize the capacity of killer e-tailers to matrix.
Quick: do you have a reality-based game plan for monitoring unplanned-for e-markets?
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and VOIP.
We will intensify our capability to implement without depreciating our aptitude to disintermediate.
Quick: do you have a end-to-end scheme for monitoring unplanned-for supply-chains?