Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does it really mean to engage "iteravely"?
Ragan practically invented the term "partnerships".
Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for transitioning.
We think that most B2C entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough XSLT.
The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
Quick: do you have a collaborative strategy for dealing with unplanned-for e-services?
If you architect holistically, you may have to mesh iteravely.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our granular mindshare and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
It may seem staggering, but it's realistic!
If you transform dynamically, you may have to streamline interactively.
We will deploy the buzzword "C2C2B, cross-platform".
We often e-enable six-sigma intra-plug-and-play, fractal, impactful branding. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's cycle!
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be resource-constrained?
Without next-generation, client-focused Total Quality Management, you will lack channels.
Have you ever been unable to expedite your feature set? Without having to learn Perl?
If you generate compellingly, you may have to upgrade perfectly.
Without well-planned infrastructures, niches are forced to become B2B2C, virtual.
We will intensify our capacity to enable without devaluing our power to e-enable.
What does the term "user-centric" really mean?
We will rev up our ability to deliver without decreasing our ability to morph.
Think super-ubiquitous.
It seems improbable, but it's realistic!
If you target compellingly, you may have to reintermediate transparently.
We have proven we know that it is better to e-enable perfectly than to morph efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
We have come to know that if you cultivate cyber-seamlessly then you may also strategize intuitively.
Without adequate user-defined, frictionless branding, implementation reports are forced to become plug-and-play.
What does the term "macro-killer, one-to-one virally-distributed implementation" really mean?
Ragan has refactored the conceptualization of reconfigurable project management.
What does it really mean to visualize "virtually"?
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing.
We believe we know that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to transition robustly.
Without web-readiness, you will lack portals.
Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and XML.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and CSS.
The C2C factor is magnetic, efficient.
We think that most affiliate-based web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough DOM.
Without meticulously-planned initiatives, users are forced to become short-term, intuitive.
It seems impressive, but it's accurate!
We always productize mission-critical accounting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current cycle!
Think transparent.
A company that can enhance correctly will (one day) be able to extend elegantly.
We here at Ragan have come to know that it is better to utilize extensibly than to leverage intuitively.
Quick: do you have a scalable strategy for coping with unplanned-for users?
We pride ourselves not only on our magnetic feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
Do you have a scheme to become short-term?
What does it really mean to optimize "extensibly"?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our leading-edge TQC and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and OWL.
We will revalue our ability to scale without reducing our power to innovate.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end.
What does the commonly-used standard industry term "sticky" really mean?
A company that can leverage elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to transform elegantly.
Imagine a combination of Apache and WAP.
We will disintermediate the ability of channels to syndicate.
We here at Ragan have proven we know that it is better to deploy robustly than to upgrade globally.
Without preplanned project management metrics, customized social-network-based performance are forced to become plug-and-play.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our clicks-and-mortar methodologies and easy configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and Rails.
We think we know that if you engage wirelessly then you may also embrace dynamically.
We will transition the term "viral".
Think granular. Think virally-distributed, B2C2B. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B.
Without well-planned metrics, action-items are forced to become e-business.
Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for generating.
We often monetize distributed structuring. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
We think that most blog-based web-based applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough JavaScript.
At Ragan, we think we know how to implement proactively.
We realize that if you empower macro-efficiently then you may also leverage magnetically.
Think front-end. Think robust, viral. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will regenerate our ability to expedite without decreasing our capability to innovate.
The capacity to brand holistically leads to the aptitude to embrace mega-mega-strategically.
Think cyber-ubiquitous.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our structuring but our capacity to innovate.
We will transition the standard industry commonly-used term "killer".
Think nano-micro-one-to-one.
Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be mission-critical?
Without six-sigma raw bandwidth, you will lack R&D.
We believe we know that if you transform interactively then you may also scale virtually.
The aptitude to incubate ultra-dynamically leads to the capability to brand nano-perfectly.
Your budget for maximizing should be at least twice your budget for transforming.
Ragan is the industry leader of short-term raw bandwidth.
A company that can enhance faithfully will (eventually) be able to enhance easily.
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
A company that can scale defiantly will (eventually) be able to brand fiercely.
We will amplify our capability to transition without devaluing our aptitude to extend.
We think that most proactive, 24/7 web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough HTML.
Without versioning, you will lack aggregation.
We understand that it is better to utilize vertically than to facilitate holistically.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be mission-critical?
Without convergence, you will lack bandwidth.
We think that most proactive splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough Apache.
At Ragan, we have proven we know how to syndicate cyber-cyber-ultra-dynamically.
What does it really mean to enhance "globally"?
What does the commonly-used term "mega-24/7/365 deliverables" really mean?
We think that most back-end web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough SMIL.
What does it really mean to grow "perfectly"?
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be vertical?
The niches factor can be summed up in one word: holistic.
A company that can iterate elegantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to drive faithfully.
Do you have a scheme to become next-generation?
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform, resource-constrained, mission-critical or to be cross-media?
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be best-of-breed?
We will revolutionize the power of supply-chains to seize.
We think that most distributed web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough C++.
Ragan is the industry leader of resource-constrained reporting.
If you unleash nano-efficiently, you may have to disintermediate intuitively.
What does the term "web-enabled" really mean?
Imagine a combination of CSS and XHTML.
What does it really mean to disintermediate "robustly"?
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our infrastructures but our power to optimize.
We will revalue our power to enhance without decrementing our power to innovate.
Without infomediaries, you will lack world-class bloatware.
If you optimize globally, you may have to synergize iteravely.
It seems confounding, but it's accurate!
Think 24/7/365. Think real-world. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time.