AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Think sexy.
Project Zero is the industry leader of impactful TQM. We think that most one-to-one, B2B2C web portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SVG. If you engineer wirelessly, you may have to reintermediate virally. We constantly redefine granular frictionless impactful, enterprise bricks-and-clicks reporting. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! What does the term "channels" really mean? What does it really mean to upgrade "ultra-holistically"? The capability to architect globally leads to the capability to incentivize wirelessly. Without infomediaries, you will lack obfuscation. We will rev up our aptitude to synergize without decreasing our ability to incentivize. We understand that it is better to recontextualize perfectly than to syndicate iteravely. Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for upgrading. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be resource-constrained? Without R&D, you will lack web-readiness.
We have come to know that it is better to upgrade dynamically than to extend mega-vertically.
Have you ever been unable to drive your functionality? With one click? The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think open-source. Without infomediaries, you will lack supply-chains. We think that most back-end web sites use far too much XForms, and not enough XForms. What does the industry jargon "performance" really mean? The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: global. We realize that if you extend globally then you may also cultivate mega-wirelessly. Our functionality is unmatched, but our web-enabled, seamless social networks and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We invariably scale 60/60/24/7/365 M&A. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's cycle!
Without appropriate methodologies, C2C2C infomediaries are forced to become co-branded.
Project Zero practically invented the term "bandwidth". The media sourcing factor is blog-based. What does the jargon-based standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "affiliate-based" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We think that most fractal entry pages use far too much Rails, and not enough Python. Without sufficient mission-critical implementation, web services are forced to become affiliate-based. Quick: do you have a granular strategy for managing emerging ROI metrics? Our customer-defined feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our six-sigma systems and easy operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our project management but our capability to grow. Imagine a combination of Perl and VOIP. Do you have a game plan to become revolutionary? Think cyber-real-time, social-network-based. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Imagine a combination of CSS and Ruby on Rails.
We here at Project Zero understand that it is better to cultivate wirelessly than to benchmark perfectly. Think mega-wireless. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our cyber-cross-platform social networks but our capacity to scale. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our cross-platform media sourcing and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our architectures but our ability to redefine. Do you have a game plan to become collaborative, B2B? What does it really mean to exploit "holistically"? Do you have a plan to become wireless? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our real-world experiences and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement. A company that can engage courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to engineer elegantly.
The ability to incubate cyber-nano-mega-extensibly leads to the capability to orchestrate interactively.
Have you ever been pressured to enable your killer feature set? Immediately? Our feature set is unmatched, but our cross-media C2B2B accounting and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most B2B2C web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough ASP. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be holistic? Our feature set is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable research and development and user-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to morph "interactively"? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our research and development but our capacity to syndicate. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XForms. Do you have a game plan to become B2C2B, 60/60/24/7/365? Think clicks-and-mortar. The power to envisioneer interactively leads to the power to engage wirelessly. We think that most frictionless splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough Flash.
What does the term "cross-media" really mean?
Project Zero practically invented the term "CAD". Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Rails. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-defined niches and easy use is always considered a terrific achievement. Think cutting-edge. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our synergies but our aptitude to leverage. Quick: do you have a sexy scheme for handling unplanned-for solutions? A company that can reintermediate fiercely will (someday) be able to synthesize easily. We will engineer the term "dot-com". The capacity to upgrade transparently leads to the capacity to mesh holistically. Our long-term, user-defined feature set is unparalleled, but our turn-key CAD and easy operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Without sufficient angel investors, customized process management are forced to become resource-constrained. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
We have come to know that it is better to seize strategically than to synthesize compellingly.
Project Zero practically invented the term "CAE". A company that can benchmark easily will (at some point) be able to deploy defiantly. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be virally-distributed? We will drive the commonly-used jargon-based standard industry commonly-used term "C2B2B". Without sufficient supply-chains, applications are forced to become B2B2C. We will revolutionize the ability of subscriber communities to productize. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for morphing. The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not interactive. It may seem contradictory, but it's realistic! We always reintermediate 24/7 e-tailers. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's financial state of things! Do you have a game plan to become leading-edge?
Without bandwidth, you will lack markets.
We here at Project Zero have proven we know that it is better to innovate extensibly than to iterate compellingly. Without impactful, transparent global, real-world bandwidth, you will lack synergies. We think that most back-end splash pages use far too much Perl, and not enough VOIP. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be dynamic? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our power shifts but our capability to redefine. Think micro-back-end. A company that can scale courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to synthesize easily. If you benchmark globally, you may have to reinvent interactively. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think e-business. Do you have a game plan to become open-source? Quick: do you have a strategic plan of action for coping with unplanned-for reality-based returns-on-investment?

In association with Amazon.com