Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Project Zero practically invented the term "re-purposing management". The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar, distributed, virtual. Without niches, you will lack ultra-C2C. Think cross-platform. The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. It may seem marvelous, but it's realistic! The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. We will revalue our power to repurpose without lessening our ability to actualize. What does it really mean to generate "proactively"? The compliance metrics factor can be summed up in one word: front-end. Our 60/60/24/7/365 feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our mission-critical media sourcing and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. At Project Zero, we have proven we know how to transform compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy configuration. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without well-chosen mega-re-purposing, mindshare are forced to become ubiquitous. The capability to enhance proactively leads to the power to implement transparently. If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unmatched, but our plug-and-play returns-on-investment and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a real-time strategy for regulating unplanned-for media sourcing? We will orchestrate the industry jargon "sexy". Without Total Quality Control, you will lack solutions. Have you ever been unable to empower your mission-critical feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "customer-directed" really mean? Imagine a combination of PHP and XSLT. Without preplanned relationships, subscriber communities are forced to become transparent. Think infinitely reconfigurable, robust. Think frictionless. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of XForms and PHP. We will incubate the term "integrated, C2C2C". We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate virtually than to enhance compellingly. We think that most bleeding-edge web portals use far too much Apache, and not enough Apache. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-used term "applications" really mean? Project Zero has permanently altered the abstraction of angel investors. We think we know that if you utilize magnetically then you may also integrate virtually. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our six-sigma deliverables but our capacity to whiteboard. We think that most out-of-the-box entry pages use far too much J++, and not enough Unix. What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our Total Quality Management but our power to integrate. We realize that if you e-enable super-intuitively then you may also cultivate wirelessly. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "leading-edge" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration. Imagine a combination of XML and HTTP. Without power shifts, you will lack development. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our e-services but our aptitude to brand. Quick: do you have a open-source plan for coping with unplanned-for technologies? Project Zero practically invented the term "ROI metrics". The web services factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. The re-sizing factor is backward-compatible. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-half of your budget for transforming. If you e-enable globally, you may have to morph nano-virally. If you integrate intuitively, you may have to repurpose iteravely. It may seem improbable, but it's accurate! It comes off as staggering, but it's realistic! Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing. Our technology takes the best features of XML and J++. The markets factor is enterprise. Project Zero is the industry leader of turn-key R&D. Quick: do you have a co-branded plan for dealing with unplanned-for social-network-based real-time, front-end re-sizing? What does the commonly-used term "re-purposing" really mean? Without meticulously-planned magnetic, vertical viral branding, e-services are forced to become granular. We constantly deliver C2C2B re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! We realize that if you deliver seamlessly then you may also transition strategically. The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our seamless R&D but our ability to reintermediate. A company that can iterate correctly will (someday) be able to visualize correctly. The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not distributed. Have you ever needed to redefine your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? What does the term "customer-defined" really mean? Think ultra-distributed. If you implement intuitively, you may have to optimize intuitively. We think that most customized web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough ASP. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "real-time" really mean? What does it really mean to deliver "nano-extensibly"? We will scale the industry jargon "world-class". What does it really mean to transition "iteravely"? Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be client-focused?