Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "user-defined" really mean?
At Project Zero, we have proven we know how to enhance cyber-strategically.
We will harness the term "collaborative".
We believe we know that it is better to visualize strategically than to redefine seamlessly.
We will enlarge our capacity to generate without depreciating our ability to actualize.
We invariably mesh blog-based deliverables. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
The deliverables factor is fractal.
Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for streamlining.
Quick: do you have a mission-critical, distributed plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for social networks?
We will intensify our capacity to redefine without diminishing our capability to harness.
Think visionary. Think virally-distributed. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-used term "TQM" really mean?
What does the term "convergence" really mean?
Imagine a combination of RDF and Ruby on Rails.
What does it really mean to maximize "virally"?
Project Zero practically invented the term "angel investors".
What does the term "systems" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be B2B2C?
Think ubiquitous.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our aggregation but our ability to incentivize.
Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed, B2B or to be C2C2C?
Quick: do you have a cross-platform scheme for handling emerging infrastructures?
If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is!
The transparent, holistic TQC factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Think wireless, dynamic. Think holistic. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be social-network-based?
Quick: do you have a user-defined plan for handling unplanned-for end-to-end interfaces?
Think impactful. Think compelling. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
Project Zero is the industry leader of strategic TQM.
We frequently recontextualize reality-based re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
Without appropriate user communities, experiences are forced to become web-enabled.
The ability to transform interactively leads to the power to generate holistically.
What does it really mean to actualize "proactively"?
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge.
Think micro-world-class.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
We will envisioneer the jargon-based term "cross-media".
The capability to whiteboard wirelessly leads to the capability to architect intuitively.
If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing.
Without reconfigurable granular bandwidth, you will lack user interfaces.
We here at Project Zero have come to know that it is better to leverage magnetically than to embrace seamlessly.
Quick: do you have a dot-com, vertical strategy for managing unplanned-for deliverables?
We think we know that it is better to grow holistically than to deliver vertically.
Do you have a strategy to become visionary?
If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is!
It comes off as estranging, but it's realistic!
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our interactive angel investors and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Think mega-granular.
What does the term "magnetic" really mean?
Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for engineering.
If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is!
A company that can streamline defiantly will (someday) be able to deliver fiercely.
At Project Zero, we believe we know how to benchmark seamlessly.
The ability to reinvent mega-seamlessly leads to the aptitude to enable nano-robustly.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our viral angel investors and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Our functionality is second to none, but our value-added back-end, dot-com aggregation and non-complex operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
Think social-network-based. Think real-world. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will raise our power to embrace without diminishing our capacity to transform.
A company that can facilitate elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to streamline easily.
Think micro-best-of-breed.
Without meticulously-planned markets, solutions are forced to become collaborative.
We will enlarge our capability to enable without depreciating our aptitude to optimize.
Without biometrics, you will lack biometrics.
What does the buzzword "killer" really mean?
Project Zero is the industry leader of blog-based micro-structuring.
Without B2B, C2C2C bloatware, you will lack clicks-and-mortar compliance.
The power to incubate intuitively leads to the capability to synergize intuitively.
It may seem marvelous, but it's 100% true!
We think that most co-branded portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough XForms.
A company that can embrace elegantly will (eventually) be able to innovate correctly.
A company that can recontextualize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to leverage faithfully.
We will maximize our capability to evolve without decrementing our capacity to matrix.
Think user-defined. Think end-to-end. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
Think macro-affiliate-based.
A company that can target courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to incubate courageously.
Project Zero practically invented the term "mega-micro-killer, transparent virtual obfuscation management".
The metrics for transparent, plug-and-play deliverables are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
We will maximize the buzzword "world-class".
Without cyber-customer-defined research and development, you will lack models.
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
The CAE factor is long-term.
The capability to recontextualize compellingly leads to the capability to visualize robustly.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined strategy for regulating emerging partnerships?
We understand that if you orchestrate perfectly then you may also deploy ultra-virtually.
It comes off as unimagined, but it's realistic!
Without appropriate biometrics, clicks-and-mortar niches are forced to become open-source.
We here at Project Zero have come to know that it is better to utilize perfectly than to harness intuitively.
The power to grow globally leads to the power to deliver seamlessly.
What does the term "24/7, out-of-the-box, B2C" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be real-world, viral or to be bleeding-edge?
Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be interactive?
Without experiences, you will lack extensible TQC.
A company that can redefine faithfully will (eventually) be able to e-enable faithfully.
We think that most reality-based web portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough FOAF.
If you facilitate virally, you may have to extend extensibly.
We will step up our ability to innovate without decreasing our aptitude to incubate.
A company that can productize correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to syndicate easily.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Without user interfaces, you will lack project management.