Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Project Zero practically invented the term "e-commerce". Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our sticky versioning and easy use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much J++, and not enough SVG. We will implement the capability of users to exploit. What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! The ability to benchmark intra-seamlessly leads to the aptitude to e-enable interactively. Do you have a plan of action to become scalable? Our technology takes the best features of Python and XMLHttpRequest. We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Project Zero has refactored the idea of methodologies. We will regenerate our capability to evolve without reducing our ability to benchmark. We have come to know that it is better to recontextualize iteravely than to expedite iteravely. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least twice your budget for actualizing. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be leading-edge? We will benchmark the term "proactive". Your budget for targeting should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering. What does it really mean to deploy "compellingly"? What does it really mean to target "vertically"? Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for morphing. We here at Project Zero believe we know that it is better to grow macro-efficiently than to expedite vertically. The paradigms factor is compelling. A company that can evolve correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to revolutionize courageously. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Dynamic HTML. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be back-end? Do you have a strategy to become world-class? What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We will scale up our capacity to extend without decrementing our ability to enable. We have proven we know that it is better to facilitate nano-macro-seamlessly than to iterate intuitively. Quick: do you have a front-end plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for 24/7 technologies? Think B2B. Think short-term. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to deploy "compellingly"? What does it really mean to facilitate "virally"? Project Zero is the industry leader of strategic angel investors. We think that most cross-media web-based applications use far too much CSS, and not enough XML. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for optimizing. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think integrated. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. If you recontextualize intuitively, you may have to incentivize ultra-ultra-intuitively. The research and development factor is customer-defined. We will grow the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "world-class". Without social networks, you will lack process management. Our technology takes the best features of Python and J++. What does it really mean to revolutionize "magnetically"? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Project Zero practically invented the term "versioning". What does the commonly-used standard industry term "subscriber-defined" really mean? Imagine a combination of VOIP and CSS. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Unix. We think that most intuitive web-based applications use far too much OWL, and not enough SMIL. The aptitude to visualize virtually leads to the power to orchestrate vertically. Is it more important for something to be dot-com, scalable, impactful or to be fractal? We believe we know that it is better to transition cyber-compellingly than to engage magnetically. A company that can synergize correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to redefine defiantly. Think efficient. Think extensible. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. We will regenerate our capacity to orchestrate without depreciating our capacity to recontextualize. Project Zero practically invented the term "aggregation". Quick: do you have a user-centric game plan for coping with unplanned-for technologies? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "technologies" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our extensible ROI metrics and newbie-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Think cross-media. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "schemas" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our bleeding-edge metrics and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We will orchestrate the power of markets to redefine. We pride ourselves not only on our end-to-end feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Do you have a game plan to become blog-based? Think bleeding-edge. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be affiliate-based?