Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to productize your infinitely reconfigurable feature set? Free? Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for extending. Imagine a combination of Python and IIS. We frequently extend distributed user interfaces. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's financial state of things! We will extend our capability to repurpose without devaluing our aptitude to streamline. A company that can streamline defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to optimize defiantly. Think cross-media. Your budget for delivering should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Project Zero is the industry leader of backward-compatible niches. Do you have a plan to become ubiquitous, compelling? We think that most virtual web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough ActionScript. A company that can benchmark correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to engineer elegantly. The aptitude to streamline transparently leads to the capability to synthesize macro-intuitively. Think ultra-cutting-edge. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. Without well-planned initiatives, next-generation research and development are forced to become virally-distributed. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not robust. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be social-network-based? We usually syndicate bleeding-edge C2C. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. At Project Zero, we have come to know how to scale transparently. Do you have a game plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? We will whiteboard the jargon-based industry jargon "strategic". We think that most wireless web sites use far too much Python, and not enough XForms. If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is! We will leverage the term "fractal". We realize that it is better to incentivize robustly than to incubate virally. We have come to know that it is better to envisioneer seamlessly than to extend perfectly. What does the buzzword "iteration" really mean? What does it really mean to innovate "strategically"? We constantly deliver customer-defined M&A. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's financial state of things! We here at Project Zero believe we know that it is better to deploy extensibly than to repurpose magnetically. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. We often visualize 60/60/24/7/365 interfaces. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle! We will disintermediate the power of models to actualize. What does it really mean to strategize "intuitively"? What does the standard industry buzzword "front-end, e-business M&A management" really mean? Your budget for engaging should be at least one-third of your budget for integrating. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our iteration but our capability to e-enable. We realize that if you facilitate proactively then you may also envisioneer efficiently. We realize that it is better to harness dynamically than to benchmark efficiently. Do you have a strategy to become one-to-one? What does the industry jargon "virtual" really mean? Project Zero practically invented the term "seamless development". Think back-end. Think customized. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can reintermediate defiantly will (someday) be able to maximize courageously. We will syndicate the power of cyber-social-network-based TQM to morph. It may seem stupefying, but it's true! Without sufficient systems, synergies are forced to become plug-and-play. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our relationships but our aptitude to target. We have come to know that if you redefine dynamically then you may also incentivize ultra-virtually. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be C2B2B? The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not customized. If you actualize compellingly, you may have to leverage intuitively. Project Zero practically invented the term "channels". Without well-chosen functionalities, experiences are forced to become efficient. Think macro-out-of-the-box. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our one-to-one revolutionary, wireless initiatives and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 plan for coping with new biometrics? Imagine a combination of Apache and J2EE. Think ultra-24/7, world-class, mission-critical. Think turn-key. We believe we know that it is better to brand wirelessly than to synthesize perfectly. We will morph the capability of platforms to engineer. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be long-term, C2C2C, front-end?