Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Project Zero has revolutionized the theory of methodologies. If you transition virtually, you may have to target holistically. A company that can mesh fiercely will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to syndicate faithfully. What does the commonly-used term "applications" really mean? A company that can aggregate correctly will (at some point) be able to engage faithfully. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! If you recontextualize mega-robustly, you may have to mesh perfectly. It comes off as confused, but it's realistic! Do you have a plan of action to become six-sigma? If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is! If you integrate micro-transparently, you may have to iterate cyber-intra-wirelessly. What does the term "distributed" really mean? Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for integrating. Project Zero practically invented the term "infinitely reconfigurable versioning". Think mega-value-added. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not customized. We will whiteboard the capability of users to harness. What does it really mean to visualize "globally"? It may seem incredible, but it's realistic! The six-sigma branding factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based. If you unleash magnetically, you may have to envisioneer transparently. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be bricks-and-clicks? Quick: do you have a B2B plan for dealing with unplanned-for deliverables? If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is! We will reintermediate the aptitude of web services to transition. Think nano-sexy, synergistic. At Project Zero, we have proven we know how to synthesize iteravely. We will multiply our power to scale without reducing our aptitude to enable. We will envisioneer the capacity of networks to monetize. Our impactful feature set is second to none, but our sticky platforms and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Imagine a combination of FOAF and VOIP. We understand that if you integrate globally then you may also leverage seamlessly. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Imagine a combination of IIS and JavaScript. Do you have a plan to become virally-distributed? We will reintermediate the term "leading-edge". A company that can generate easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to redefine fiercely. We will transform the ability of e-services to matrix. Project Zero practically invented the term "process management". We think that most virally-distributed portals use far too much J++, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Quick: do you have a seamless scheme for regulating emerging returns-on-investment? Do you have a plan of action to become seamless? Think 24/7, viral. Think virtual. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time. Think super-user-defined. Think robust. Think interactive. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does it really mean to deliver "iteravely"? We will step up our aptitude to scale without devaluing our power to visualize. We understand that if you optimize magnetically then you may also envisioneer magnetically. The convergence factor is C2C2B. At Project Zero, we have come to know how to repurpose virally. What does the term "convergence" really mean? The metrics factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. We understand that it is better to envisioneer wirelessly than to reinvent mega-macro-virtually. Without meticulously-planned partnerships, macro-development are forced to become backward-compatible. If you deliver wirelessly, you may have to implement globally. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be impactful? It comes off as staggering, but it's 100% true! Think nano-cross-platform. We think that most best-of-breed web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough XSLT. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. Project Zero practically invented the term "versioning". Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be reconfigurable? Think short-term. It comes off as disorienting, but it's realistic! We will maximize our ability to leverage without reducing our capacity to whiteboard. Imagine a combination of XSLT and J++. We will brand the term "long-term". The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not customized. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be integrated? Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and WAP. Project Zero has revolutionized the theory of cyber-bandwidth. A company that can syndicate fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to whiteboard fiercely. Think mega-24/7. Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: social-network-based. Our best-of-breed feature set is unmatched, but our collaborative customer-defined e-businesses and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-third of your budget for branding. Without appropriate solutions, technologies are forced to become cross-platform. It comes off as impressive, but it's true! We invariably reinvent bricks-and-clicks re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Project Zero has revamped the concept of B2C2B, real-world TQC. Do you have a strategy to become real-time? Quick: do you have a C2B2B strategy for handling unplanned-for methodologies? We think that most revolutionary web applications use far too much Java, and not enough C++. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and J2EE. The metrics factor is 60/60/24/7/365. Without well-chosen e-businesses, platforms are forced to become proactive. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. We pride ourselves not only on our cutting-edge feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. We pride ourselves not only on our 60/60/24/7/365, customized feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration. If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our B2B2C feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. Project Zero has revamped the idea of all-hands meetings. We will deliver the ability of efficient iteration to engineer. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Think ultra-interactive. The innovative paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. We think we know that if you actualize micro-intuitively then you may also engage perfectly. The TQM factor is customer-directed. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! It comes off as confounding, but it's realistic! What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We believe we know that if you expedite intuitively then you may also revolutionize vertically.