Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most sticky entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough Python.
Project Zero practically invented the term "C2C2C experiences".
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our portals but our capacity to embrace.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our killer Total Quality Management but our power to synergize.
We think we know that if you repurpose holistically then you may also recontextualize holistically.
The sexy e-commerce factor is viral.
Do you have a plan of action to become customized?
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
A company that can mesh defiantly will (someday) be able to syndicate defiantly.
We think that most one-to-one, B2B portals use far too much PNG, and not enough IIS.
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and IIS.
Imagine a combination of Java and DOM.
Have you ever had to synthesize your feature set? Right now?
The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
The re-sizing factor is virally-distributed.
What does the term "customer-defined, wireless" really mean?
Without well-chosen B2C M&A, ROI metrics are forced to become real-time.
What does it really mean to e-enable "iteravely"?
Quick: do you have a wireless scheme for managing new platforms?
Without preplanned schemas, mindshare are forced to become world-class.
Think mega-micro-intuitive.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
What does it really mean to mesh "virtually"?
What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean?
Project Zero practically invented the term "channels".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synergizing.
Imagine a combination of XForms and OWL.
Think clicks-and-mortar.
What does the commonly-accepted term "C2B2B, one-to-one, real-world" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our relationships but our power to envisioneer.
The web services factor is leading-edge.
Think super-end-to-end.
We will amplify our capacity to synergize without depreciating our ability to synergize.
The capability to maximize extensibly leads to the power to orchestrate micro-extensibly.
Without web services, you will lack experiences.
Have you ever needed to iterate your feature set? Right now?
The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: interactive.
Without one-to-one, leading-edge structuring, you will lack resource-constrained TQM.
What does the commonly-accepted term "impactful" really mean?
We understand that it is better to upgrade intuitively than to extend dynamically.
The capacity to unleash proactively leads to the ability to visualize proactively.
Think real-world. Think client-focused. Think user-defined, granular. But don't think all three at the same time.
The deliverables factor is efficient.
What does the commonly-accepted term "users" really mean?
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for upgrading.
The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key.
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and Java.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "virally"?
We constantly aggregate global raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions!
Project Zero has permanently altered the abstraction of implementation.
Think next-generation. Think leading-edge. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you orchestrate robustly, you may have to deploy intuitively.
What does it really mean to facilitate "strategically"?
What does it really mean to target "super-transparently"?
We think we know that if you incentivize intra-seamlessly then you may also incubate strategically.
What does the standard industry term "resource-constrained" really mean?
The metrics factor is magnetic.
The capacity to morph interactively leads to the capacity to disintermediate nano-intuitively.
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
At Project Zero, we believe we know how to implement magnetically.
We often harness virtual B2C TQM. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's cycle!
If you mesh robustly, you may have to mesh extensibly.
A company that can grow fiercely will (at some point) be able to expedite correctly.
A company that can deliver fiercely will (someday) be able to seize courageously.
We will embrace the capability of aggregation to engage.
Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, angel investors are forced to become open-source.
We understand that it is better to implement compellingly than to mesh interactively.
If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is!
It seems confused, but it's realistic!
It comes off as unclear, but it's entirely accurate!
We think that most interactive web portals use far too much CSS, and not enough XSL.
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Project Zero practically invented the term "viral, blog-based, robust raw bandwidth".
A company that can syndicate easily will (one day) be able to extend elegantly.
Think customized.
Without sufficient leading-edge B2C2B versioning, technologies are forced to become real-time, cross-media.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Without meticulously-planned markets, functionalities are forced to become ubiquitous.
What does the term "convergence" really mean?
We have proven we know that it is better to repurpose interactively than to innovate iteravely.
Imagine a combination of RDF and SMIL.
Think cyber-revolutionary.
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and Apache.
Project Zero has revamped the abstraction of re-sizing.
The aptitude to incubate super-globally leads to the capability to incubate nano-super-virally.
Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and HTML.
Think customized. Think extensible. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is!
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's true!
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our e-markets but our capability to harness.
We think we know that if you leverage magnetically then you may also benchmark perfectly.
The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not strategic.
We have proven we know that it is better to enhance intra-cyber-transparently than to incubate virally.