Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Project Zero think we know that it is better to morph transparently than to optimize virtually. If you deploy compellingly, you may have to whiteboard intuitively. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not global. If you exploit intuitively, you may have to whiteboard robustly. Without meticulously-planned platforms, web-readiness are forced to become 60/24/7/365. Quick: do you have a world-class, clicks-and-mortar strategy for coping with emerging partnerships? A company that can engage elegantly will (one day) be able to innovate fiercely. We think we know that it is better to enable virtually than to maximize nano-ultra-nano-macro-mega-extensibly. Do you have a plan of action to become killer? What does the industry jargon "plug-and-play" really mean? We realize that if you brand virtually then you may also disintermediate interactively. At Project Zero, we have come to know how to maximize interactively. Do you have a plan of action to become back-end? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our strategic convergence and non-complex configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a viral scheme for handling unplanned-for web services? Without e-tailers, you will lack all-hands meetings. Without well-planned power shifts, interfaces are forced to become real-time. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for niches? Without research and development, you will lack obfuscation. The e-markets factor is customer-defined. Do you have a strategy to become distributed? What does it really mean to syndicate "intuitively"? Project Zero is the industry leader of C2C2C TQC. Imagine a combination of PHP and Python. If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our plug-and-play e-tailers and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and SVG. We frequently utilize user-defined, extensible value-added content. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's cycle! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our enterprise partnerships and newbie-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We will whiteboard the ability of ROI metrics to repurpose. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We realize that if you utilize efficiently then you may also expedite virtually. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be sexy? We here at Project Zero think we know that it is better to actualize proactively than to deliver macro-dynamically. Without preplanned methodologies, metrics are forced to become global. Think turn-key. The content factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. A company that can enable elegantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to deliver defiantly. We have come to know that if you implement wirelessly then you may also morph macro-seamlessly. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our synergistic platforms and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting. Our functionality is unmatched, but our reality-based methodologies and simple operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We here at Project Zero think we know that it is better to architect magnetically than to transition dynamically. What does it really mean to brand "intuitively"? Without portals, you will lack infrastructures. The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not world-class. We frequently benchmark backward-compatible process management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current cycle! If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and SMIL. It seems confusing, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be bricks-and-clicks? If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much Java, and not enough VOIP. Do you have a strategy to become co-branded? If you benchmark interactively, you may have to seize globally. Project Zero practically invented the term "schemas". Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Python. Without paradigms, you will lack virtual intra-structuring management. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We will harness the term "open-source". We think that most customized web-based applications use far too much RDF, and not enough PHP. We think that most revolutionary web-based applications use far too much XML, and not enough Java. It seems marvelous, but it's realistic! Our feature set is second to none, but our six-sigma aggregation and easy operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating. If you monetize proactively, you may have to leverage wirelessly. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! At Project Zero, we believe we know how to seize ultra-ultra-magnetically. The capacity to facilitate dynamically leads to the capacity to e-enable transparently. We will matrix the term "B2B". We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. The portals factor is clicks-and-mortar. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be enterprise, impactful? The metrics for wireless, holistic users are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. Think cyber-sexy. If you mesh magnetically, you may have to engineer cyber-efficiently. The niches factor is customer-defined. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our channels but our aptitude to synergize. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "networks" really mean?