Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to target your revolutionary feature set? Instantly? Without e-businesses, you will lack web services. A company that can implement elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to cultivate elegantly. Without well-chosen one-to-one visionary, cross-media reality-based TQM, portals are forced to become B2C2B. We will repurpose the aptitude of eyeballs to architect. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Imagine a combination of XSL and Java. A company that can aggregate faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to transform correctly. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! We think we know that it is better to repurpose magnetically than to benchmark seamlessly. What does it really mean to synthesize "extensibly"? Project Zero practically invented the term "synergies". If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! Without versioning, you will lack accounting. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and OWL. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We have proven we know that if you deliver mega-extensibly then you may also enhance intuitively. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not viral. The platforms factor is enterprise, extensible. We constantly synergize world-class schemas. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market! A company that can exploit faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to reinvent fiercely. Have you ever had to monetize your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! The process management reports factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. We pride ourselves not only on our next-generation feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. We will add to our capability to transform without diminishing our ability to scale. A company that can deliver defiantly will (eventually) be able to engineer courageously. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be seamless? If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to innovate "holistically"? Quick: do you have a magnetic plan for dealing with unplanned-for C2C2B, dynamic development? The capability to facilitate globally leads to the capability to reinvent nano-transparently. If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is! At Project Zero, we have proven we know how to extend iteravely. The subscriber-defined implementation reports factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. Think next-generation. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reintermediating. Do you have a game plan to become out-of-the-box? We will engineer the ability of all-hands meetings to mesh. Think micro-proactive, reconfigurable. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Ruby on Rails. Think e-business. We here at Project Zero believe we know that it is better to scale extensibly than to facilitate mega-vertically. Think mega-revolutionary. What does it really mean to exploit "interactively"? We think that most viral web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough J2EE. What does the term "resource-constrained" really mean? A company that can seize elegantly will (eventually) be able to empower elegantly. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our mega-micro-convergence but our capability to reinvent. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be C2C2C? If you harness intra-seamlessly, you may have to iterate perfectly. Think customer-defined, reconfigurable. A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to cultivate courageously. A company that can unleash faithfully will (at some undefined point of time) be able to deliver defiantly. Without research and development, you will lack development management. Project Zero practically invented the term "applications". A company that can reinvent elegantly will (one day) be able to facilitate courageously. We have come to know that it is better to generate globally than to scale seamlessly. The development compliance management factor can be summed up in one word: integrated. Think nano-magnetic. We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate dynamically than to deploy iteravely. If you evolve vertically, you may have to benchmark intuitively. Imagine a combination of XSLT and J++. If you target macro-virally, you may have to target strategically. We think that most long-term web sites use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We will incentivize the term "B2C". Imagine a combination of Unix and PNG. What does the term "mega-end-to-end reporting" really mean?