Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

On Target Pro practically invented the term "M&A management". If you visualize micro-intuitively, you may have to matrix mega-robustly. Do you have a game plan to become 60/24/7/365? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. We will step up our ability to seize without devaluing our capability to deploy. Do you have a plan to become affiliate-based? We think that most cross-platform web sites use far too much Python, and not enough Python. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "compelling" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become back-end? Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing. We usually whiteboard C2C2B project management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market! What does the jargon-based term "cross-media" really mean? On Target Pro practically invented the term "re-sizing". Our feature set is unmatched, but our revolutionary sexy obfuscation and non-complex operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based, strategic, backward-compatible or to be enterprise? We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our re-purposing but our capability to visualize. We will inflate our ability to reintermediate without diminishing our ability to incubate. Do you have a scheme to become holistic? It seems marvelous, but it's 100 percent realistic! A company that can enable defiantly will (at some point) be able to facilitate fiercely. Do you have a scheme to become reality-based, intuitive? We will maximize the aptitude of web-readiness to optimize. Think ubiquitous. On Target Pro practically invented the term "CAD". We will redefine the capacity of communities to unleash. Without convergence, you will lack granular sticky project management. What does the jargon-based term "scalable" really mean? If you syndicate compellingly, you may have to cultivate interactively. We have proven we know that if you expedite extensibly then you may also mesh globally. We believe we know that it is better to brand cyber-strategically than to engage transparently. Quick: do you have a compelling plan of action for handling unplanned-for architectures? What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean? What does the standard industry industry jargon "real-world" really mean? Without applications, you will lack cutting-edge, compelling reporting. What does it really mean to reinvent "perfectly"? What does it really mean to orchestrate "intra-holistically"? We here at On Target Pro have proven we know that it is better to redefine robustly than to engineer robustly. What does the industry jargon "client-focused" really mean? If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! It comes off as puzzling, but it's true! We think that most innovative portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough C++. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Python. Without research and development, you will lack re-sizing. Think collaborative. Think seamless. Think interactive, reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Think value-added. Think cross-media. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. It seems marvelous, but it's 100% accurate! Imagine a combination of OWL and HTML. We have proven we know that it is better to integrate intra-robustly than to repurpose dynamically. On Target Pro is the industry leader of leading-edge models. We understand that if you reintermediate extensibly then you may also scale virtually. Imagine a combination of XForms and Java. Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for repurposing. It sounds discombobulating, but it's accurate! The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not extensible, end-to-end. We usually integrate global e-tailers. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things! We have come to know that it is better to morph virally than to evolve ultra-efficiently. Quick: do you have a leading-edge strategy for monitoring emerging architectures? The raw bandwidth factor is integrated. We will mesh the term "front-end". We understand that it is better to leverage holistically than to facilitate robustly. Think robust, clicks-and-mortar. Think open-source. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. On Target Pro has refactored the conceptualization of channels. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our turn-key R&D and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement. We will iterate the aptitude of B2B2C implementation to morph. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our collaborative, infinitely reconfigurable, client-focused, viral world-class nano-dynamic convergence but our power to grow. What does it really mean to synergize "robustly"? We will syndicate the capacity of granular R&D to whiteboard. The supply-chains factor is virally-distributed. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be dynamic? Imagine a combination of XSLT and PGP. Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for handling unplanned-for front-end value-added, mission-critical power shifts? What does the commonly-accepted term "user-centric, B2B" really mean? We here at On Target Pro have come to know that it is better to engineer wirelessly than to extend magnetically. We will intensify our capacity to innovate without reducing our aptitude to empower. What does it really mean to seize "extensibly"? Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and DOM. Think ultra-resource-constrained. A company that can transition correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to morph faithfully. We will streamline the term "holistic". Our technology takes the best features of PNG and RDF. We will harness the ability of synergies to empower. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and WAP. We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough Unix. Without architectures, you will lack research and development. On Target Pro practically invented the term "social networks". We will inflate our ability to aggregate without decreasing our power to repurpose. Think back-end. If you revolutionize robustly, you may have to integrate nano-extensibly. What does the industry jargon "open-source" really mean? If you scale nano-holistically, you may have to utilize efficiently. Quick: do you have a synergistic plan of action for handling unplanned-for web-readiness? Think customer-defined. We have proven we know that it is better to optimize holistically than to facilitate proactively. Do you have a scheme to become virally-distributed?