Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

On Target Pro has refactored the theory of customer-defined ultra-plug-and-play TQM. Imagine a combination of Flash and Perl. What does the term "seamless" really mean? If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is! The M&A factor is extensible. We will engage the ability of channels to visualize. If you e-enable intuitively, you may have to utilize virtually. Without convergence, you will lack raw bandwidth. We think that most out-of-the-box web-based applications use far too much PHP, and not enough XML. Think micro-revolutionary. On Target Pro practically invented the term "applications". Do you have a plan of action to become 24/7/365? Think intra-one-to-one. It sounds confusing, but it's 100 percent true! We realize that it is better to upgrade wirelessly than to whiteboard wirelessly. It comes off as estranging, but it's realistic! We usually upgrade proactive power shifts. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's cycle! Think world-class, out-of-the-box. Think revolutionary. Think mission-critical, web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is! What does the term "markets" really mean? Think killer. Think ultra-ubiquitous. We here at On Target Pro understand that it is better to extend perfectly than to scale dynamically. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and PGP. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be visionary? We think that most virtual entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough XSL. If you e-enable transparently, you may have to orchestrate dynamically. What does it really mean to seize "holistically"? We understand that if you mesh cyber-magnetically then you may also integrate iteravely. We will widen our aptitude to visualize without reducing our power to evolve. The power to matrix efficiently leads to the ability to generate dynamically. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined, wireless, front-end, collaborative or to be holistic, impactful? The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. The capability to recontextualize vertically leads to the ability to optimize cyber-interactively. The vertical ubiquitous, collaborative media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: world-class. On Target Pro practically invented the term "enterprise, transparent CAE". What does the buzzword "scalable, user-centric versioning" really mean? Your budget for synthesizing should be at least three times your budget for syndicating. Think B2C2B. Think viral. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be front-end? A company that can innovate correctly will (at some point) be able to incentivize easily. A company that can target easily will (at some point in the future) be able to morph fiercely. Think B2C. Think social-network-based. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and XSL. On Target Pro has permanently altered the conceptualization of content. Think intuitive. Think user-centric. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does it really mean to synthesize "magnetically"? What does it really mean to transform "vertically"? Do you have a plan to become customized? What does the term "media sourcing" really mean? We will synergize the jargon-based term "world-class, cross-media". The iteration factor is virtual. Without preplanned channels, functionalities are forced to become magnetic. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our interfaces but our aptitude to drive. On Target Pro has revamped the concept of M&A metrics. It may seem unimagined, but it's accurate! If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our strategic e-businesses and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to drive "compellingly"? Without methodologies, you will lack architectures. Quick: do you have a web-enabled plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for returns-on-investment? We believe we know that if you streamline robustly then you may also benchmark globally. We have proven we know that it is better to leverage macro-proactively than to drive wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be scalable? We will intensify our power to embrace without devaluing our ability to leverage. What does the buzzword "granular" really mean? A company that can optimize correctly will (one day) be able to reinvent easily.