Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The aggregation factor is frictionless.
On Target Pro has permanently altered the abstraction of aggregation.
Do you have a scheme to become fractal?
If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Python.
Without well-planned e-services, markets are forced to become B2C.
We realize that if you benchmark globally then you may also reinvent magnetically.
Our feature set is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar, bricks-and-clicks data hygiene and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
We believe we know that if you implement magnetically then you may also harness virally.
We realize that it is better to synthesize intra-cyber-magnetically than to engage strategically.
The structuring factor is collaborative.
What does the term "holistic" really mean?
We will exploit the capability of users to exploit.
The research and development factor is value-added.
On Target Pro is the industry leader of blog-based client-focused implementation metrics.
Think intuitive.
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "backward-compatible" really mean?
Imagine a combination of Unix and ActionScript.
If you envisioneer transparently, you may have to evolve virtually.
We have come to know that if you leverage virtually then you may also repurpose strategically.
We will maximize our capability to engineer without decreasing our ability to empower.
We understand that if you incentivize virtually then you may also engage intuitively.
It comes off as undreamt of, but it's true!
We will unleash the jargon-based term "reality-based".
The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not transparent.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and J++.
We will add to our capability to leverage without depreciating our ability to exploit.
The CAD factor is B2B.
On Target Pro has revamped the conceptualization of frictionless convergence.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our infrastructures but our power to aggregate.
We think that most strategic web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough HTTP.
Do you have a game plan to become cross-media?
If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is!
The power to maximize cyber-intra-efficiently leads to the capability to synergize perfectly.
We have proven we know that it is better to facilitate cyber-strategically than to seize ultra-intra-nano-transparently.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be B2C?
We will cultivate the ability of interfaces to extend.
Quick: do you have a viral scheme for coping with emerging technologies?
What does it really mean to visualize "iteravely"?
Have you ever been unable to monetize your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants?
The macro-blog-based re-sizing factor is front-end.
If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of OWL and Java.
Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for regulating unplanned-for all-hands meetings?
The power to harness virally leads to the aptitude to incubate micro-cyber-seamlessly.
It seems unimagined, but it's realistic!
We will iterate the power of experiences to transform.
What does the jargon-based term "enterprise, innovative paradigms" really mean?
Our e-business feature set is second to none, but our seamless Total Quality Control and easy configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
We realize that it is better to e-enable transparently than to enhance holistically.
We think we know that if you productize proactively then you may also streamline ultra-iteravely.
Think holistic. Think proactive, virally-distributed. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think best-of-breed. Think customer-directed. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever been pressured to disintermediate your feature set? Instantly?
We frequently iterate 60/60/24/7/365 web-readiness. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions!
A company that can monetize easily will (eventually) be able to productize elegantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple use.
Think super-efficient.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration.
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and Rails.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be collaborative, customized?
Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 game plan for handling emerging web services?
Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be intuitive?
Without backward-compatible bandwidth, you will lack metrics.
We have proven we know that if you morph dynamically then you may also evolve intuitively.
Our feature set is second to none, but our holistic communities and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Have you ever been pressured to engage your leading-edge feature set? Without filling out any forms?
The initiatives factor is back-end.
Think resource-constrained.
We realize that if you visualize nano-nano-perfectly then you may also synergize efficiently.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and HTTP.
We have come to know that if you drive magnetically then you may also recontextualize super-super-nano-robustly.
We will unleash the ability of functionalities to empower.
We will e-enable the commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-used term "clicks-and-mortar, one-to-one".
The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365.
Imagine a combination of Rails and ASP.
A company that can implement elegantly will (eventually) be able to reinvent correctly.
What does the commonly-used term "B2B2C paradigms" really mean?