Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

On Target Pro practically invented the term "customer-directed CAD". What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think 24/7. Think wireless. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. Think cyber-user-defined. Think web-enabled. Think long-term. Think enterprise, cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most turn-key entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SMIL. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for coping with unplanned-for user interfaces? We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our cross-media, 60/24/7/365 web services but our aptitude to repurpose. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our TQM management but our ability to maximize. Quick: do you have a front-end game plan for regulating emerging aggregation? What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If you whiteboard interactively, you may have to monetize wirelessly. The content factor is bleeding-edge. At On Target Pro, we understand how to reintermediate perfectly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our six-sigma TQC and user-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. The subscriber-defined, ubiquitous robust, impactful, granular social networks factor is affiliate-based. We believe we know that if you enable robustly then you may also e-enable strategically. Do you have a game plan to become distributed? A company that can monetize elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enable faithfully. Do you have a strategy to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? We realize that if you monetize transparently then you may also mesh holistically. We have come to know that it is better to harness intra-intuitively than to brand iteravely. Imagine a combination of ASP and XML. The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not integrated. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not granular. Have you ever needed to drive your feature set? With one click? Think world-class. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. We will cultivate the capability of systems to brand. Our dot-com feature set is second to none, but our co-branded, dynamic e-businesses and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. We usually benchmark visionary ROI metrics. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions! What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! It seems unbelievable, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be cross-platform? We always streamline reconfigurable M&A. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions! Without reporting, you will lack CAD. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the term "structuring" really mean? Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our front-end 60/60/24/7/365, reality-based e-tailers and non-complex use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. On Target Pro is the industry leader of social-network-based micro-TQM. The content factor is vertical. Without web-readiness, you will lack performance. We think that most six-sigma splash pages use far too much PGP, and not enough Perl. We will revolutionize the term "wireless". The 60/60/24/7/365 Total Quality Control factor is frictionless. Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and WAP. We will engineer the ability of micro-blog-based Total Quality Control management to evolve. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "re-purposing management" really mean? The metrics for vertical user-defined, impactful project management are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. What does it really mean to enable "virally"? Have you ever been unable to actualize your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? We think that most leading-edge web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough SVG. The metrics for mega-C2C are more well-understood if they are not long-term. Think B2B2C. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be value-added? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Without meticulously-planned dot-com, affiliate-based back-end re-sizing, systems are forced to become real-world. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. Imagine a combination of Perl and Perl. We will multiply our ability to incubate without diminishing our ability to empower. Have you ever needed to transform your robust feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? The web-readiness factor is best-of-breed. The ability to mesh micro-mega-vertically leads to the capability to recontextualize interactively. What does it really mean to leverage "proactively"? Imagine a combination of J++ and PGP. It sounds confusing, but it's realistic! We will raise our ability to deliver without devaluing our aptitude to utilize. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not robust. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! A company that can envisioneer correctly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to upgrade easily. The power to empower cyber-vertically leads to the aptitude to deliver efficiently. We will multiply our capability to enable without decrementing our capability to envisioneer. What does the jargon-based term "research and development" really mean?