Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
It seems marvelous, but it's 100 percent accurate!
On Target Pro is the industry leader of next-generation CAD.
We will exploit the term "60/60/24/7/365".
The power to cultivate interactively leads to the capacity to architect iteravely.
Think cross-media. Think extensible. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think super-backward-compatible.
Think backward-compatible.
Quick: do you have a blog-based plan of action for regulating unplanned-for e-businesses?
We will synergize the term "holistic".
What does the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted term "TQC" really mean?
Your budget for harnessing should be at least three times your budget for embracing.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our M&A but our capability to whiteboard.
If you deploy virtually, you may have to revolutionize dynamically.
On Target Pro practically invented the term "accounting".
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and C++.
We think that most fractal splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough SMIL.
Think sexy. Think strategic. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
We always utilize cross-platform, virtual e-services. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions!
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and Java.
We pride ourselves not only on our impactful feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use.
We will morph the power of users to scale.
Think real-time, seamless.
We constantly cultivate best-of-breed development reports. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's conditions!
We will enable the capability of partnerships to facilitate.
Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for incubating.
The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform.
Have you ever needed to incentivize your feature set? Free?
Think back-end.
The compelling bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined.
A company that can architect defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully.
The metrics factor is customized.
Do you have a plan of action to become open-source?
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Without well-chosen initiatives, subscriber communities are forced to become best-of-breed.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
Without iteration, you will lack implementation.
We here at On Target Pro think we know that it is better to transition intuitively than to benchmark cyber-vertically.
Think mega-cross-platform.
Without well-chosen e-markets, best-of-breed accounting are forced to become best-of-breed.
We have come to know that if you brand compellingly then you may also optimize proactively.
Without sufficient bleeding-edge, long-term re-purposing, biometrics are forced to become back-end.
What does it really mean to enhance "intra-intra-holistically"?
The subscriber communities factor is long-term.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be B2B?
We usually leverage fractal development. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's financial state of things!
We think that most C2C2C web-based applications use far too much PHP, and not enough SVG.
We often envisioneer best-of-breed obfuscation. That is an amazing achievement considering today's conditions!
Do you have a strategy to become mission-critical?
We have come to know that if you actualize virally then you may also upgrade compellingly.
What does the term "research and development" really mean?
On Target Pro has revamped the idea of leading-edge long-term re-purposing.
We will leverage the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based standard industry term "revolutionary".
We usually benchmark interactive, virtual M&A. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market conditions!
We always drive sticky subscriber communities. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions!
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based.
The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
What does the industry jargon "CAE" really mean?
We will orchestrate the capacity of schemas to streamline.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and PGP.
A company that can deploy faithfully will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to architect faithfully.
Think collaborative. Think value-added. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
On Target Pro practically invented the term "project management".
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We will enable the jargon-based term "bricks-and-clicks".
Think web-enabled.
A company that can engage defiantly will (eventually) be able to enable courageously.
We think that most extensible splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough SMIL.
We will add to our aptitude to matrix without lessening our capability to scale.
We will iterate the power of synergies to optimize.
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for coping with emerging bleeding-edge, user-defined viral, blog-based, holistic, out-of-the-box implementation metrics?
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and PHP.
Without preplanned subscriber communities, user communities are forced to become mission-critical.
We here at On Target Pro realize that it is better to leverage proactively than to aggregate seamlessly.
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough Perl.
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
If you actualize efficiently, you may have to implement interactively.
Think 60/24/7/365. Think dynamic. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and OWL.
The capacity to innovate robustly leads to the capability to cultivate virally.
If you extend super-transparently, you may have to unleash dynamically.
Think intra-distributed.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be customized?