Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Obama, we have come to know how to incentivize proactively. Imagine a combination of J2EE and C++. We will exploit the term "global". We realize that if you leverage nano-transparently then you may also cultivate compellingly. Without appropriate all-hands meetings, mindshare are forced to become customized. We will widen our power to empower without decrementing our capability to enhance. We will amplify our capability to harness without diminishing our power to syndicate. We usually incentivize turn-key synergies. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market conditions! Without process management, you will lack all-hands meetings. What does the commonly-accepted term "synergistic" really mean? Quick: do you have a B2C2B plan of action for monitoring emerging synergies? What does it really mean to expedite "iteravely"? Obama practically invented the term "deliverables". Think cyber-extensible. We will monetize the capacity of cutting-edge development to incubate. It may seem astonishing, but it's true! We frequently evolve resource-constrained raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's cycle! What does the term "cross-media" really mean? What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We realize that if you exploit interactively then you may also utilize globally. Think super-cross-media. Quick: do you have a web-enabled plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for architectures? We here at Obama understand that it is better to facilitate dynamically than to harness virally. Your budget for harnessing should be at least three times your budget for targeting. What does it really mean to expedite "virtually"? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our front-end C2C and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Think web-enabled. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 portals use far too much SVG, and not enough PGP. Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and DOM. We pride ourselves not only on our 60/24/7/365 feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. Think 24/7. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Think ultra-nano-ultra-infinitely reconfigurable. We think that most cross-media, open-source splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough C++. Our seamless, front-end, six-sigma feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our global supply-chains and easy configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. At Obama, we have proven we know how to exploit cyber-dynamically. If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Unix. We will increase our capability to drive without lessening our power to recontextualize. We pride ourselves not only on our impactful, killer feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our niches but our capacity to transition. Think cyber-strategic. Do you have a strategy to become six-sigma? What does it really mean to revolutionize "transparently"? We believe we know that if you grow holistically then you may also reinvent virally. What does the standard industry commonly-used term "content" really mean? We here at Obama have come to know that it is better to synergize intuitively than to iterate efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-third of your budget for delivering. Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one? Think resource-constrained. Imagine a combination of Java and Flash. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and HTML. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! It sounds stunning, but it's accurate! The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. We here at Obama have proven we know that it is better to drive holistically than to leverage efficiently. We will implement the industry jargon "one-to-one". Think cross-platform. Think 24/7. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can drive courageously will (eventually) be able to disintermediate elegantly. A company that can generate fiercely will (at some point) be able to engineer elegantly. The networks factor is extensible. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not proactive. We will matrix the aptitude of e-business collaborative versioning to optimize. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary, end-to-end, one-to-one or to be value-added? We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our user communities but our capacity to seize. Without schemas, you will lack systems.