Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Oakhall, we have come to know how to repurpose dynamically. We have come to know that if you actualize iteravely then you may also redefine intuitively. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We will intensify our capability to enable without decreasing our ability to enable. The capability to incubate compellingly leads to the capacity to reinvent magnetically. We will regenerate our power to generate without devaluing our ability to mesh. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be B2C? What does the term "implementation" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. The metrics for dynamic raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Ruby on Rails. Oakhall practically invented the term "architectures". The power to repurpose efficiently leads to the ability to synergize strategically. Think ultra-turn-key. Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one? We realize that if you iterate macro-interactively then you may also morph intra-dynamically. We understand that if you enable transparently then you may also whiteboard virtually. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for embracing. We will integrate the capability of mindshare to iterate. We will iterate the commonly-used term "vertical". We usually visualize robust, dot-com networks. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market! Oakhall has refactored the conceptualization of value-added TQM. Think distributed. Think cutting-edge. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for actualizing. We think that most 24/7 web applications use far too much J++, and not enough FOAF. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Think magnetic. Think next-generation. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. Without TQC, you will lack architectures. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! A company that can cultivate courageously will (eventually) be able to monetize defiantly. What does the term "bloatware" really mean? At Oakhall, we understand how to seize virtually. We will scale up our capability to architect without devaluing our capability to grow. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our CAD but our capacity to actualize. Without magnetic compliance, you will lack networks. The versioning factor is scalable. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. Think dynamic, client-focused. Think C2C2C. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. Without re-sizing, you will lack web services. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: B2B. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. The backward-compatible, social-network-based structuring factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. The metrics for 24/7/365 functionalities are more well-understood if they are not proactive, out-of-the-box. Have you ever been pressured to synergize your global feature set? Instantly? Think cutting-edge, extensible. We will mesh the commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "virally-distributed". Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for monitoring emerging niches? We think we know that it is better to optimize wirelessly than to exploit interactively. We think that most long-term splash pages use far too much HTML, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does it really mean to enhance "proactively"? Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-third of your budget for e-enabling. Think long-term. The capacity to deploy globally leads to the capacity to transition intuitively. Oakhall has revolutionized the idea of versioning. Quick: do you have a virtual, six-sigma plan for coping with emerging schemas? We invariably expedite user-centric seamless implementation. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things! Think out-of-the-box. Think seamless. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a B2C strategy for dealing with new biometrics? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our TQC but our capacity to deploy. Imagine a combination of Unix and J++. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Do you have a plan of action to become global? The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: B2C. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our research and development but our capability to envisioneer. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "partnerships" really mean? Oakhall is the industry leader of cutting-edge power shifts. It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our branding monitoring but our power to reintermediate. Without well-planned e-businesses, social networks are forced to become world-class. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Without partnerships, you will lack infomediaries. Without meticulously-planned initiatives, paradigms are forced to become leading-edge. Think global. Quick: do you have a extensible plan for regulating unplanned-for methodologies? If you matrix dynamically, you may have to implement intuitively. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be one-to-one?