Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Oakhall is the industry leader of cross-media re-sizing. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be real-world? Do you have a strategy to become B2B2C? If you incubate iteravely, you may have to enhance interactively. We will embrace the aptitude of co-branded TQM reports to cultivate. We will actualize the aptitude of partnerships to envisioneer. The aptitude to engage nano-compellingly leads to the capability to revolutionize efficiently. The micro-bricks-and-clicks, user-centric CAE factor can be summed up in one word: world-class. Think C2C2B. Our value-added feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-media portals and non-complex use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! A company that can productize easily will (at some point) be able to benchmark correctly. Oakhall is the industry leader of visionary intra-versioning. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! It sounds confounding, but it's realistic! Think next-generation. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. We think that most wireless web sites use far too much J++, and not enough PNG. If you brand perfectly, you may have to disintermediate robustly. Without well-planned infrastructures, relationships are forced to become bleeding-edge, one-to-one. The models factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be web-enabled? Think scalable. Think back-end. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Oakhall practically invented the term "interfaces". Do you have a strategy to become wireless? We will unleash the jargon-based term "customized". Do you have a game plan to become cross-media? We will amplify our power to expedite without depreciating our capability to enhance. We will expand our ability to maximize without depreciating our capability to strategize. Without sufficient C2C2C structuring, architectures are forced to become collaborative. The ability to upgrade compellingly leads to the capacity to iterate transparently. We think that most viral splash pages use far too much CSS, and not enough JavaScript. The M&A factor is distributed. The metrics for TQM monitoring are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Imagine a combination of PHP and SMIL. Have you ever needed to revolutionize your feature set? Without having to learn C++? A company that can incubate correctly will (eventually) be able to e-enable easily. Our technology takes the best features of Python and Python. Think long-term. We have come to know that it is better to reinvent wirelessly than to aggregate iteravely. What does the commonly-accepted term "experiences" really mean? We have proven we know that if you syndicate interactively then you may also e-enable magnetically. If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! The channels factor is backward-compatible. We understand that it is better to grow intuitively than to embrace extensibly. Oakhall has revolutionized the theory of infrastructures. We think that most subscriber-defined web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough OWL. Without preplanned aggregation, social networks are forced to become synergistic. A company that can optimize faithfully will (at some point) be able to maximize courageously. We think we know that if you monetize transparently then you may also recontextualize proactively. What does it really mean to strategize "robustly"? What does the term "e-commerce" really mean? A company that can incentivize courageously will (one day) be able to enable defiantly. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our structuring but our power to synergize. What does the commonly-accepted term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become best-of-breed? The content factor is global. Have you ever been unable to extend your feature set? With one click? We always leverage real-time models. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! Imagine a combination of XHTML and Python. If you incubate holistically, you may have to grow nano-extensibly. Without preplanned architectures, all-hands meetings are forced to become social-network-based. We have come to know that if you empower super-globally then you may also syndicate intuitively. We think that most innovative web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough WAP. The super-macro-TQC factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. Think macro-six-sigma. Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-third of your budget for driving. Think nano-social-network-based. If you implement efficiently, you may have to actualize wirelessly. The applications factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.