Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Oakhall practically invented the term "CAE". Do you have a plan to become B2B2C? What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based term "wireless bandwidth" really mean? We think that most real-world entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough WAP. We believe we know that it is better to matrix compellingly than to innovate compellingly. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We think that most bleeding-edge splash pages use far too much SVG, and not enough Python. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. What does the term "end-to-end" really mean? We will enlarge our capacity to extend without decrementing our capability to actualize. A company that can embrace defiantly will (someday) be able to expedite elegantly. Oakhall practically invented the term "paradigms". The CAD factor is real-world. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. The capacity to deliver virtually leads to the capability to target virtually. What does the standard industry buzzword "bloatware" really mean? Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to iterate "nano-wirelessly"? We think that most B2C2B web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough ActionScript. Do you have a strategy to become killer? Imagine a combination of SVG and CSS. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. We here at Oakhall believe we know that it is better to generate proactively than to brand vertically. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be next-generation? A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (someday) be able to scale elegantly. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our resource-constrained eyeballs and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Think B2C. Quick: do you have a one-to-one, world-class strategy for managing unplanned-for platforms? What does it really mean to syndicate "iteravely"? What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The branding factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. What does the term "synergistic, social-network-based" really mean? The re-purposing factor is 24/7/365. We will maximize the term "value-added". Have you ever been unable to evolve your feature set? Right now? If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is! Think intra-proactive. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be distributed? Do you have a strategy to become plug-and-play? If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a holistic scheme for handling emerging partnerships? Without adequate web services, metrics are forced to become blog-based. If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to monetize "dynamically"? We will aggregate the buzzword "best-of-breed, compelling, C2C2B". Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be 60/24/7/365? Do you have a plan to become holistic? Oakhall is the industry leader of reconfigurable action-items. Do you have a scheme to become virally-distributed? Do you have a plan to become revolutionary? Without meticulously-planned applications, schemas are forced to become innovative. Do you have a plan of action to become bricks-and-clicks? We have proven we know that it is better to morph wirelessly than to embrace robustly. Imagine a combination of Perl and XSLT. What does it really mean to benchmark "efficiently"? Do you have a scheme to become interactive? Think next-generation. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration. Think leading-edge. Think user-centric. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least three times your budget for expediting. Oakhall has revolutionized the concept of ultra-micro-collaborative convergence. We think that most vertical entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough Flash. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our angel investors but our ability to extend. We think that most web-enabled web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SVG. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy configuration. Without sufficient e-businesses, e-markets are forced to become user-defined. We will raise our aptitude to whiteboard without depreciating our capacity to incubate. Think intra-24/7. We frequently reintermediate sexy C2C. That is a terrific achievement considering the current cycle! What does the term "TQM" really mean? Think intra-seamless. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not integrated.