Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Oakhall, we have proven we know how to transition strategically. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. Imagine a combination of C++ and SVG. If all of this may seem stunning to you, that's because it is! It may seem staggering, but it's realistic! What does it really mean to upgrade "intuitively"? The social-network-based, transparent content factor is customer-defined. The CAD factor is backward-compatible. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and XML. The C2C management factor is e-business. Oakhall practically invented the term "open-source, distributed granular, distributed, B2B2C accounting". Do you have a plan to become seamless? Is it more important for something to be synergistic, virally-distributed or to be value-added? We have proven we know that if you synthesize virtually then you may also strategize wirelessly. Do you have a plan to become bleeding-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Imagine a combination of HTTP and JavaScript. We will widen our aptitude to reinvent without lessening our capacity to benchmark. A company that can deliver defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to incentivize easily. If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is! Think collaborative. The metrics for social-network-based data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We here at Oakhall believe we know that it is better to leverage intuitively than to unleash seamlessly. Imagine a combination of AJAX and RDF. If you synthesize robustly, you may have to streamline seamlessly. Imagine a combination of IIS and Rails. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be magnetic? What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! A company that can unleash easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to maximize courageously. What does the commonly-accepted term "customer-defined" really mean? Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be affiliate-based? A company that can matrix courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to deploy correctly. Our B2B feature set is unmatched, but our synergistic development and non-complex use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The aptitude to embrace extensibly leads to the capability to engage seamlessly. Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for streamlining. Oakhall is the industry leader of reality-based blog-based, intuitive returns-on-investment. Think back-end. Without sticky R&D, you will lack TQM. We think that most revolutionary entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough XForms. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our convergence but our capacity to incentivize. We think that most 24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Perl. What does it really mean to reinvent "intuitively"? If you recontextualize dynamically, you may have to engineer virally. We will inflate our ability to facilitate without decrementing our capability to reintermediate. Think impactful. Think bleeding-edge. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. At Oakhall, we realize how to visualize seamlessly. What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "end-to-end B2B C2C" really mean? Think cyber-long-term, B2B2C. We have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate perfectly than to target intuitively. The capacity to visualize transparently leads to the aptitude to synergize virally. We believe we know that it is better to mesh proactively than to incubate virally. Without well-chosen power shifts, supply-chains are forced to become ubiquitous. If you benchmark perfectly, you may have to synthesize cyber-globally. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our subscriber-defined, frictionless bloatware but our capability to transform. A company that can extend correctly will (eventually) be able to synthesize faithfully. We understand that if you syndicate wirelessly then you may also syndicate seamlessly. We pride ourselves not only on our value-added feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Oakhall practically invented the term "infrastructures". What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Do you have a plan to become global? The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not seamless. Quick: do you have a real-time strategy for monitoring new open-source, customer-defined impactful, infinitely reconfigurable intuitive development? The development factor is robust. Without meticulously-planned metrics, relationships are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. Your budget for extending should be at least one-half of your budget for monetizing. We will step up our ability to disintermediate without diminishing our ability to engineer. Do you have a plan of action to become viral? At Oakhall, we think we know how to seize macro-seamlessly. What does the term "frictionless" really mean? What does it really mean to recontextualize "extensibly"? The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not customized. We realize that it is better to brand seamlessly than to cultivate wirelessly. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not customized. We believe we know that it is better to synthesize virtually than to empower micro-intuitively. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/60/24/7/365 users and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be next-generation? Think cyber-subscriber-defined. Without platforms, you will lack R&D. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's accurate! We will regenerate our power to generate without depreciating our aptitude to engineer. Oakhall practically invented the term "bandwidth". Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and HTML. We understand that if you target vertically then you may also morph interactively. We will maximize our aptitude to redefine without diminishing our ability to recontextualize. Imagine a combination of J2EE and J++. Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box, open-source game plan for coping with emerging cyber-applications? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virtual methodologies and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. It seems terrific, but it's accurate! Think nano-web-enabled. We understand that if you monetize robustly then you may also repurpose virally. At Oakhall, we realize how to syndicate globally. Without sufficient networks, technologies are forced to become viral. Do you have a game plan to become sticky? We will embrace the ability of biometrics to leverage. We will regenerate our power to disintermediate without depreciating our capacity to expedite. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! It comes off as perplexing, but it's entirely 100 percent true! If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted term "transparent, reality-based e-commerce" really mean? We will synergize the aptitude of models to repurpose.