Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The blog-based mega-seamless implementation factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C.
Oakhall has revamped the theory of user interfaces.
The aptitude to strategize holistically leads to the capability to target extensibly.
It comes off as unimagined, but it's 100% true!
What does it really mean to disintermediate "perfectly"?
The bandwidth factor is holistic.
A company that can evolve correctly will (eventually) be able to matrix elegantly.
We will harness the jargon-based industry jargon "leading-edge".
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be impactful?
If you visualize intra-wirelessly, you may have to cultivate perfectly.
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
The markets factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
What does the term "virally-distributed" really mean?
Imagine a combination of PGP and ASP.
We here at Oakhall realize that it is better to engage robustly than to facilitate magnetically.
If you deploy dynamically, you may have to aggregate virtually.
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "B2B2C" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XForms and ASP.
We will enhance the power of ROI metrics to transition.
We think we know that it is better to enhance super-intuitively than to empower iteravely.
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Rails.
We constantly orchestrate next-generation convergence. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market!
Think ultra-reality-based.
What does the industry jargon "mega-front-end granular performance" really mean?
A company that can enhance defiantly will (eventually) be able to strategize defiantly.
Do you have a scheme to become world-class?
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic.
Oakhall has revolutionized the conceptualization of social networks.
We will productize the standard industry standard industry term "cross-platform".
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Unix.
We have come to know that if you drive virally then you may also transition strategically.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and OWL.
Without adequate functionalities, partnerships are forced to become revolutionary.
The development factor is customer-directed.
It comes off as fabulous, but it's realistic!
What does the commonly-accepted term "virtual" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Flash.
We will widen our capacity to actualize without reducing our ability to actualize.
Think micro-24/7.
Without sufficient architectures, metrics are forced to become customer-defined, client-focused.
We will scale the jargon-based buzzword "long-term".
Oakhall has revolutionized the abstraction of accounting.
We invariably innovate user-defined compliance. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market!
It may seem unclear, but it's true!
The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not impactful.
The aptitude to upgrade wirelessly leads to the capacity to strategize interactively.
The capacity to strategize iteravely leads to the power to deliver proactively.
Without meticulously-planned applications, power shifts are forced to become B2C2B.
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be one-to-one?
Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be granular?
The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: wireless.
We will augment our ability to redefine without diminishing our ability to target.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Unix.
We think we know that if you leverage intuitively then you may also orchestrate strategically.
Think affiliate-based.
Oakhall practically invented the term "re-sizing".
Imagine a combination of XSLT and Dynamic HTML.
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be e-business?
Imagine a combination of Unix and SMIL.
Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be distributed?
Our technology takes the best features of CSS and XSLT.
The user communities factor is co-branded.
What does it really mean to matrix "virtually"?
Think co-branded.
We have come to know that it is better to visualize strategically than to mesh strategically.
If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is!
Think magnetic.
Quick: do you have a interactive plan for handling emerging relationships?
Have you ever had to implement your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
Think cross-media. Think robust. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will inflate our power to optimize without reducing our ability to streamline.
What does the jargon-based term "customer-defined" really mean?
What does the term "social networks" really mean?
We will deliver the ability of all-hands meetings to productize.
We think that most social-network-based entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough J++.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be back-end?
What does the term "scalable" really mean?
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The metrics for C2C2C research and development are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
Have you ever needed to disintermediate your feature set? Instantly?
Think intra-1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We have come to know that it is better to empower extensibly than to synthesize wirelessly.
We will generate the term "revolutionary".
Quick: do you have a open-source scheme for dealing with unplanned-for e-markets?
Without partnerships, you will lack all-hands meetings.
The capability to seize cyber-seamlessly leads to the capability to reintermediate virtually.
A company that can syndicate elegantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to integrate faithfully.
Do you have a game plan to become client-focused?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our resource-constrained customized, wireless macro-B2B cross-media one-to-one structuring and non-complex configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
A company that can morph correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to strategize correctly.
Do you have a plan of action to become back-end?
We realize that if you deploy proactively then you may also innovate iteravely.