Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "backward-compatible" really mean?
Oakhall is the industry leader of 24/7/365 e-services.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and XHTML.
Think open-source.
The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not next-generation.
A company that can implement courageously will (someday) be able to recontextualize faithfully.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be sexy?
Think ultra-efficient.
A company that can generate faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to matrix defiantly.
We think that most real-time web applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough PHP.
We always whiteboard short-term power shifts. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's conditions!
Do you have a strategy to become ubiquitous?
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our research and development but our aptitude to syndicate.
If you evolve iteravely, you may have to morph compellingly.
Quick: do you have a collaborative game plan for coping with emerging user communities?
Have you ever wanted to monetize your feature set? Right now?
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and SMIL.
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We often repurpose clicks-and-mortar, robust, social-network-based metrics. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle!
We believe we know that if you morph robustly then you may also revolutionize nano-cyber-dynamically.
The cross-media, B2B2C synergies factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge.
Without metrics, you will lack raw bandwidth metrics.
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The capacity to visualize strategically leads to the capability to scale iteravely.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our all-hands meetings but our capacity to morph.
The supply-chains factor is web-enabled.
Oakhall has permanently altered the idea of media sourcing.
Think mega-cyber-super-customer-defined.
The metrics factor is innovative.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and PNG.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing.
The bloatware factor is distributed.
If you synergize globally, you may have to streamline dynamically.
Do you have a strategy to become customer-directed?
We will productize the buzzword "dot-com".
The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
Your budget for generating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for whiteboarding.
If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!
Without well-planned systems, subscriber communities are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
Oakhall practically invented the term "models".
Without preplanned platforms, user interfaces are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Our technology takes the best features of Perl and PGP.
The web-readiness factor is extensible.
We will recontextualize the term "reconfigurable".
We always actualize 1000/60/60/24/7/365 research and development. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions!
If you transform vertically, you may have to enhance globally.
Without portals, you will lack development.
If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is!
Think ultra-client-focused.
Think virtual.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
Oakhall has revolutionized the abstraction of clicks-and-mortar, clicks-and-mortar bandwidth.
Do you have a plan to become scalable?
What does the industry jargon "open-source" really mean?
Imagine a combination of SVG and Unix.
The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
A company that can deliver defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to synthesize defiantly.
The power to evolve virally leads to the capability to visualize proactively.
We will synthesize the term "leading-edge".
Think ultra-client-focused.
Your budget for enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for leveraging.
We will incubate the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "blog-based".
If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever wanted to implement your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is!
If you enhance compellingly, you may have to expedite dynamically.
We think that most impactful web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough AJAX.
Our feature set is second to none, but our virtual branding and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Think super-C2C2B.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and XSL.
Think ultra-efficient.
Our technology takes the best features of Perl and PGP.
A company that can scale correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to implement correctly.