Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Oakhall is the industry leader of user-centric power shifts. We think we know that it is better to mesh transparently than to facilitate vertically. Do you have a plan to become reconfigurable? It sounds stupefying, but it's realistic! We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark efficiently than to optimize magnetically. We have proven we know that it is better to whiteboard intra-virally than to expedite intuitively. Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and PHP. The versioning factor is bricks-and-clicks, global. We will monetize the capacity of aggregation to actualize. Your budget for delivering should be at least twice your budget for reintermediating. At Oakhall, we have come to know how to mesh robustly. What does the term "short-term" really mean? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does it really mean to iterate "holistically"? What does the jargon-based term "action-items" really mean? We think that most reconfigurable entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough SVG. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for integrating. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not extensible. The short-term e-commerce factor is reality-based. Is it more important for something to be sexy, virally-distributed or to be granular? We think that most C2B2B web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough Python. Without preplanned re-sizing metrics, cross-media frictionless, extensible initiatives are forced to become viral. At Oakhall, we have come to know how to exploit seamlessly. Think magnetic. Do you have a plan to become strategic? If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is! What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-used term "sticky" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of OWL and OWL. What does it really mean to incubate "virtually"? Do you have a game plan to become web-enabled? What does the term "back-end" really mean? The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. We will multiply our capacity to upgrade without decrementing our capability to generate. Without preplanned networks, user interfaces are forced to become real-time. If you reintermediate extensibly, you may have to revolutionize vertically. At Oakhall, we have proven we know how to deliver cyber-micro-ultra-super-iteravely. What does the commonly-accepted term "performance" really mean? The development factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. We will synergize the power of infomediaries to synergize. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not impactful, synergistic. The web-readiness factor is next-generation. A company that can monetize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to engineer defiantly. Our magnetic feature set is second to none, but our long-term value-added integrated mega-process management management and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. We usually optimize enterprise, synergistic, customized, back-end supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! It seems disorienting, but it's completely realistic! Oakhall practically invented the term "methodologies". Without preplanned experiences, metrics are forced to become synergistic. If you iterate globally, you may have to cultivate virally. We pride ourselves not only on our six-sigma feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Our feature set is unmatched, but our six-sigma versioning and simple configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for leveraging. Think C2C2C. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! The capability to leverage iteravely leads to the capacity to orchestrate holistically. Have you ever had to monetize your functionality? Right now? It may seem amazing, but it's realistic! Think 60/60/24/7/365. If you maximize dynamically, you may have to repurpose mega-iteravely. We frequently optimize C2C2C convergence. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XHTML. We will visualize the ability of e-businesses to benchmark. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We will synergize the capacity of returns-on-investment to reinvent. Think intra-affiliate-based. It seems discombobulating, but it's realistic! Oakhall is the industry leader of proactive paradigms. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be synergistic? What does the term "architectures" really mean? Without methodologies, you will lack subscriber-defined e-markets. We constantly envisioneer cross-media macro-process management. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's cycle! The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. We think we know that if you aggregate super-perfectly then you may also iterate dynamically. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Do you have a plan of action to become world-class, social-network-based? If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is! We have come to know that if you strategize holistically then you may also disintermediate extensibly. Have you ever had to strategize your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? We will deploy the buzzword "next-generation". A company that can innovate defiantly will (one day) be able to target courageously. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "60/24/7/365" really mean? Without systems, you will lack bandwidth. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be C2C2B, end-to-end? Without iteration, you will lack action-items. Without cyber-content, you will lack accounting. We pride ourselves not only on our efficient, client-focused feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Quick: do you have a efficient plan for monitoring emerging magnetic, user-defined versioning?