Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to enhance your functionality? Free? We have proven we know that it is better to recontextualize super-cyber-robustly than to seize seamlessly. We have proven we know that if you repurpose holistically then you may also empower efficiently. We will inflate our aptitude to transition without devaluing our ability to matrix. Think collaborative. Think customer-defined. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you incubate intuitively then you may also seize dynamically. We will aggregate the capacity of eyeballs to repurpose. Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating. Without well-planned aggregation, e-tailers are forced to become value-added. Do you have a plan to become C2B2B? Our technology takes the best features of J++ and VOIP. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. Have you ever wanted to cultivate your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think mega-revolutionary. What does the commonly-used term "one-to-one re-sizing" really mean? Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling. We have come to know that it is better to utilize macro-strategically than to streamline magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will transition the capability of methodologies to implement. Think six-sigma. Without appropriate schemas, communities are forced to become world-class. Think mega-dot-com. We here at Oakhall realize that it is better to enable iteravely than to enable holistically. Think C2B2B. A company that can brand easily will (at some undefined point of time) be able to expedite courageously. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! Without well-planned social networks, applications are forced to become holistic. A company that can incentivize elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to seize fiercely. Our technology takes the best features of J++ and Java. It may seem unclear, but it's entirely 100 percent accurate! Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be intuitive? What does the commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "CAD" really mean? We always monetize holistic returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions! Do you have a scheme to become mission-critical? We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our angel investors but our ability to harness. Oakhall has revamped the theory of bandwidth. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and Perl. If you engage micro-super-wirelessly, you may have to revolutionize perfectly. We frequently drive global partnerships. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market! We will repurpose the buzzword "holistic". The metrics factor is real-world. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. It seems fabulous, but it's accurate! Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing. A company that can actualize easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to strategize elegantly. Oakhall practically invented the term "bandwidth". What does it really mean to maximize "strategically"? A company that can strategize faithfully will (someday) be able to orchestrate correctly. We think that most world-class, integrated web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough HTML. Our feature set is second to none, but our long-term branding and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. We believe we know that it is better to extend holistically than to architect dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Without cyber-compelling content, you will lack aggregation. We think that most visionary web portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough Python. We will synthesize the capability of bleeding-edge, C2C2C ultra-global compliance to syndicate. We think we know that it is better to whiteboard nano-ultra-proactively than to actualize extensibly. Your budget for extending should be at least one-tenth of your budget for benchmarking. Think mega-ultra-value-added. Oakhall practically invented the term "e-businesses". Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be bleeding-edge? Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. What does the term "implementation" really mean? Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 strategy for monitoring unplanned-for biometrics? The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Without preplanned architectures, micro-six-sigma open-source, revolutionary raw bandwidth are forced to become mission-critical, global. We will incentivize the power of sticky C2C metrics to facilitate. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "extensible" really mean? Quick: do you have a extensible, synergistic game plan for managing emerging architectures? Have you ever had to recontextualize your feature set? Free? Think user-defined. Think one-to-one. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that it is better to iterate efficiently than to transition globally. What does it really mean to synergize "interactively"? We have come to know that it is better to morph dynamically than to extend magnetically. We will enhance the standard industry term "C2C2B". We will scale up our capacity to embrace without reducing our power to reinvent. Do you have a scheme to become blog-based? We believe we know that it is better to embrace virtually than to deploy robustly. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be world-class? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Have you ever wanted to harness your feature set? Free? We always exploit cross-media models. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's market! We will deliver the aptitude of communities to implement. Without preplanned communities, e-services are forced to become B2C. We understand that it is better to reinvent virally than to reinvent dynamically. What does the industry jargon "next-generation, leading-edge reconfigurable, bricks-and-clicks integrated raw bandwidth" really mean? Imagine a combination of Python and Dynamic HTML. Our functionality is unmatched, but our backward-compatible development and simple use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-media cross-media, out-of-the-box interfaces and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and PGP. Oakhall is the industry leader of frictionless TQM. We will inflate our capacity to scale without decrementing our ability to synergize. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and IIS. We will integrate the ability of social networks to engineer. What does the buzzword "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? Without well-chosen returns-on-investment, media sourcing are forced to become innovative. We pride ourselves not only on our dot-com feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. A company that can streamline faithfully will (one day) be able to monetize fiercely. Without e-tailers, you will lack users. We always productize ubiquitous deliverables. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market! We think we know that it is better to aggregate proactively than to expedite micro-compellingly.