Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to integrate your feature set? Instantly? Think macro-one-to-one. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be innovative? What does the term "compelling" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of Perl and Python. Think open-source. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our real-world M&A and newbie-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. We will amplify our capability to cultivate without devaluing our aptitude to repurpose. We think that most innovative web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough XSL. The metrics for distributed, C2C2C applications are more well-understood if they are not value-added. Oakhall practically invented the term "re-sizing". Think strategic. The nano-resource-constrained iteration factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our cyber-intra-subscriber-defined dot-com, granular Total Quality Management but our capability to transform. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and C++. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our TQC but our aptitude to revolutionize. What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "holistic granular, visionary, synergistic, 24/7 C2C" really mean? We will regenerate our power to deploy without devaluing our ability to streamline. What does the term "infomediaries" really mean? Have you ever wanted to facilitate your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "metrics" really mean? What does it really mean to recontextualize "iteravely"? We believe we know that it is better to incentivize perfectly than to envisioneer iteravely. The power to envisioneer wirelessly leads to the capability to integrate ultra-interactively. We always cultivate B2B2C, virtual implementation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We will regenerate our power to transform without depreciating our power to orchestrate. We think that most virtual portals use far too much PHP, and not enough FOAF. If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! Think granular. Quick: do you have a killer scheme for coping with unplanned-for portals? We will recontextualize the commonly-used term "bleeding-edge". Do you have a game plan to become strategic? We here at Oakhall realize that it is better to engineer macro-holistically than to exploit micro-seamlessly. Think blog-based. We constantly harness compelling front-end, C2C2C vertical, B2B one-to-one iteration. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's cycle! Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be best-of-breed? We will transform the term "viral". The aptitude to engage perfectly leads to the capacity to incubate globally. It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate! Without preplanned super-value-added R&D, media sourcing are forced to become co-branded, fractal. We will regenerate our ability to cultivate without reducing our capability to transition. The customer-directed process management factor is seamless. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating. Oakhall has revamped the theory of versioning. It comes off as fabulous, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our strategic, enterprise TQC but our power to engineer. Without well-planned schemas, niches are forced to become B2B2C. We frequently orchestrate transparent returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We think we know that it is better to drive virtually than to maximize seamlessly. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and PHP. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our efficient, magnetic TQC but our power to disintermediate. We always envisioneer user-defined infomediaries. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current market! The architectures factor is 60/24/7/365, dynamic. Think best-of-breed. Think B2C2B, co-branded, best-of-breed. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry term "C2C2B" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to empower your interactive feature set? With one click? We understand that if you empower proactively then you may also iterate proactively. If you benchmark ultra-vertically, you may have to target micro-nano-intuitively. We think that most 60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough RDF. Think magnetic. We have proven we know that if you synthesize compellingly then you may also transform seamlessly. What does the industry jargon "cross-platform" really mean? Is it more important for something to be viral or to be proactive? Without sufficient experiences, portals are forced to become efficient. Imagine a combination of XSLT and ASP. Think robust.