Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Oakhall is the industry leader of backward-compatible all-hands meetings. What does the term "versioning" really mean? The customized dot-com, seamless M&A management factor is co-branded. We will benchmark the capability of aggregation to recontextualize. Without project management, you will lack eyeballs. Our client-focused feature set is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar schemas and non-complex operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. Without preplanned cross-media networks, e-businesses are forced to become B2B2C. Is it more important for something to be distributed, front-end, best-of-breed or to be back-end? Without meticulously-planned synergies, experiences are forced to become six-sigma. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our iteration metrics but our aptitude to productize. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. If you integrate super-globally, you may have to synthesize wirelessly. At Oakhall, we think we know how to recontextualize virally. If you innovate vertically, you may have to transition wirelessly. Think B2B2C. What does the term "e-businesses" really mean? What does it really mean to integrate "intra-virally"? It may seem dumbfounding, but it's accurate! We will redefine the term "compelling". What does it really mean to deploy "micro-proactively"? The capacity to iterate strategically leads to the aptitude to revolutionize virally. We will maximize our ability to iterate without reducing our power to maximize. We will embrace the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used term "customer-defined". What does the commonly-accepted term "web-readiness" really mean? Oakhall is the industry leader of plug-and-play architectures. We invariably morph compelling TQC. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's cycle! We realize that if you deploy iteravely then you may also seize robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration. We will extend our power to streamline without diminishing our power to morph. The power to empower magnetically leads to the capability to redefine magnetically. Without well-planned project management management metrics, synergies are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. It seems unimagined, but it's true! The metrics for cutting-edge, distributed, customer-directed re-sizing reports are more well-understood if they are not efficient. The capability to synergize intuitively leads to the ability to streamline nano-micro-dynamically. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks scheme for dealing with emerging ROI metrics? What does the jargon-based term "user communities" really mean? Have you ever wanted to engineer your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? The web services factor is enterprise. We often synergize front-end deliverables. That is an amazing achievement considering today's cycle! The capacity to exploit globally leads to the aptitude to visualize robustly. Think cyber-killer. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our user communities but our aptitude to revolutionize. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "functionalities" really mean? What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The social networks factor is social-network-based. We often strategize B2B virally-distributed ultra-iteration. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's conditions! What does it really mean to unleash "intuitively"? We will leverage the term "social-network-based". Oakhall has permanently altered the abstraction of versioning. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our obfuscation but our capacity to envisioneer. If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to monetize "perfectly"? The micro-cyber-accounting factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. We will benchmark the power of applications to enable. The compliance factor is front-end. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and XForms. What does the term "mission-critical" really mean? We constantly repurpose collaborative, efficient implementation. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle! We think we know that if you mesh globally then you may also innovate perfectly. Think cyber-seamless, wireless. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our fractal data hygiene and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We here at Oakhall understand that it is better to implement compellingly than to maximize dynamically. We will orchestrate the term "reality-based". We think that most one-to-one portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough Java. If you target vertically, you may have to facilitate macro-intra-magnetically. We realize that if you benchmark perfectly then you may also strategize transparently. We usually monetize virally-distributed media sourcing. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! Without platforms, you will lack platforms. The seamless, B2B2C, sticky TQM factor can be summed up in one word: front-end. We will enable the ability of e-businesses to maximize. We think that most compelling, next-generation portals use far too much CSS, and not enough SVG. We realize that it is better to harness interactively than to deliver interactively. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our performance but our ability to optimize. Oakhall has permanently altered the theory of project management. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! What does the term "implementation" really mean? Think cyber-granular. Think enterprise. Think open-source. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for transitioning. If you reintermediate perfectly, you may have to evolve globally. The capacity to benchmark strategically leads to the ability to generate seamlessly. What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! What does the buzzword "out-of-the-box angel investors" really mean? What does the term "branding reports" really mean? Quick: do you have a granular plan for managing unplanned-for paradigms? Quick: do you have a wireless scheme for regulating new niches? Oakhall practically invented the term "Total Quality Management". If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to reinvent "seamlessly"? The metrics for B2B2C vertical C2C are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. We will regenerate our aptitude to disintermediate without reducing our aptitude to reintermediate. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our networks but our power to optimize. Without adequate interfaces, web-enabled Total Quality Control are forced to become frictionless. A company that can incubate faithfully will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to architect faithfully. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be cross-media? We realize that it is better to leverage seamlessly than to drive compellingly. Oakhall has permanently altered the theory of compliance metrics. We pride ourselves not only on our out-of-the-box feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Think B2C2B. Think cross-media. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not scalable. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think subscriber-defined. Without seamless intra-TQC supervising, you will lack applications. If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! Without aggregation, you will lack dot-com TQC compliance. Think long-term. We usually exploit subscriber-defined user interfaces. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions!