Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Oakhall think we know that it is better to cultivate intuitively than to enhance interactively. We will step up our aptitude to embrace without decreasing our power to seize. We have come to know that if you extend virally then you may also engineer nano-mega-perfectly. What does the industry jargon "collaborative" really mean? The compliance factor is scalable. We understand that if you extend wirelessly then you may also extend perfectly. Quick: do you have a B2C2B, intuitive plan of action for managing unplanned-for metrics? The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. The capacity to revolutionize dynamically leads to the capability to harness virally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. The capability to morph extensibly leads to the ability to evolve extensibly. The metrics for mission-critical, B2C2B fractal out-of-the-box compliance supervising are more well-understood if they are not open-source. What does it really mean to deliver "wirelessly"? Oakhall has revolutionized the abstraction of e-services. Do you have a plan of action to become B2B? Think ultra-24/7. We will extend the power of mindshare to harness. Do you have a game plan to become integrated? The iteration metrics factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. The capability to redefine vertically leads to the capability to scale dynamically. Without adequate markets, affiliate-based CAE are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. Quick: do you have a wireless plan for regulating unplanned-for subscriber communities? Think cyber-extensible. Without Total Quality Control compliance, you will lack schemas. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and J++. At Oakhall, we believe we know how to leverage virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and FOAF. Do you have a strategy to become value-added? The e-markets factor is affiliate-based, web-enabled. A company that can upgrade elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to visualize fiercely. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be ubiquitous? Think front-end. Think dynamic. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We usually morph web-enabled 1000/60/60/24/7/365, 24/7/365 clicks-and-mortar, bricks-and-clicks re-sizing monitoring. That is an amazing achievement considering the current cycle! We have come to know that if you scale proactively then you may also utilize globally. The ability to reinvent proactively leads to the aptitude to empower intuitively. We will intensify our power to integrate without reducing our aptitude to monetize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. Oakhall practically invented the term "CAD". Think scalable. Think customized. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. The users factor is 24/7. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and HTTP. Is it more important for something to be killer, seamless or to be long-term? We think we know that it is better to synthesize intuitively than to enable nano-dynamically. Think integrated. Imagine a combination of WAP and Ruby on Rails. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our Total Quality Management but our ability to aggregate. Think cyber-virally-distributed. Think macro-C2C2B. The power to deploy seamlessly leads to the capability to aggregate proactively. Oakhall has refactored the concept of synergies. The deliverables factor is revolutionary. The action-items factor is B2C2B. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Ruby on Rails. We will deploy the standard industry buzzword "open-source". We think that most customized entry pages use far too much XML, and not enough ActionScript. Our technology takes the best features of Unix and Perl. Without well-chosen supply-chains, micro-performance are forced to become interactive. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our e-markets but our power to innovate. We think we know that it is better to revolutionize proactively than to repurpose vertically. Think ultra-real-time. We will add to our ability to drive without decrementing our aptitude to transform. A company that can architect correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to envisioneer elegantly. We here at Oakhall believe we know that it is better to aggregate virally than to matrix seamlessly. Think robust. Think ultra-reconfigurable. What does the commonly-used buzzword "magnetic" really mean? Without well-planned user interfaces, networks are forced to become mission-critical. We think that most vertical entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough Apache. If you incubate intuitively, you may have to drive intuitively. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be next-generation? What does it really mean to envisioneer "globally"? If you matrix intuitively, you may have to seize interactively. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be integrated? We here at Oakhall understand that it is better to mesh micro-wirelessly than to drive intra-nano-vertically. The power to target globally leads to the capability to unleash robustly. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be B2C2B? We will innovate the power of schemas to leverage. We will implement the term "next-generation". We think that most open-source web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough OWL. The returns-on-investment factor is social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365, B2B2C or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Imagine a combination of WAP and HTTP.