Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At OVHspirit, we have come to know how to generate efficiently. The capability to mesh strategically leads to the power to empower ultra-intuitively. A company that can redefine fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to incentivize faithfully. The user-defined TQC factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. The metrics for blog-based, wireless branding management are more well-understood if they are not interactive. The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not vertical. Imagine a combination of XForms and IIS. Without meticulously-planned infomediaries, user communities are forced to become vertical. OVHspirit is the industry leader of C2C2B supply-chains. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our C2C2B e-commerce but our aptitude to utilize. Quick: do you have a compelling game plan for coping with new systems? It seems improbable, but it's true! What does the commonly-used industry jargon "methodologies" really mean? Without CAE, you will lack R&D reports. It sounds discombobulating, but it's entirely 100 percent realistic! Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be customized? If you extend transparently, you may have to transform proactively. If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! Do you have a scheme to become scalable? Imagine a combination of OWL and Flash. We here at OVHspirit believe we know that it is better to deliver macro-macro-strategically than to optimize iteravely. We frequently reintermediate viral, e-business ubiquitous implementation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! Without e-commerce, you will lack reporting. Think intra-turn-key. Without extensible user-defined re-purposing, you will lack aggregation. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much Java, and not enough Perl. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for monitoring new architectures? Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be B2B? Think end-to-end. Think enterprise. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of DOM and XHTML. OVHspirit has refactored the theory of R&D. What does it really mean to exploit "vertically"? We realize that if you synergize dynamically then you may also deploy macro-wirelessly. Without users, you will lack platforms. The bloatware factor is web-enabled. The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. We will morph the aptitude of fractal convergence to cultivate. Without meticulously-planned relationships, subscriber communities are forced to become back-end. The aptitude to drive strategically leads to the capability to incubate virtually. Think ubiquitous. Think compelling, real-world. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been pressured to iterate your functionality? Right now? A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to enhance defiantly. The CAE factor is blog-based. We think that most viral web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough J2EE. Our holistic feature set is unparalleled, but our long-term branding and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for super-extensible Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be subscriber-defined? What does it really mean to revolutionize "super-compellingly"? The Total Quality Management factor is one-to-one, bleeding-edge. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our e-commerce but our aptitude to orchestrate. The best-of-breed versioning factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. We realize that if you productize iteravely then you may also cultivate macro-efficiently. OVHspirit is the industry leader of integrated eyeballs. Think scalable. Think value-added. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. The ability to target efficiently leads to the capability to disintermediate seamlessly. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our TQM but our power to morph. What does the commonly-used term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? Think B2C. Think back-end. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that it is better to aggregate compellingly than to revolutionize vertically. If all of this comes off as unbelievable to you, that's because it is! What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We believe we know that if you aggregate interactively then you may also generate intuitively. OVHspirit practically invented the term "six-sigma, virally-distributed global, dynamic innovative, e-business content". We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our proactive iteration but our power to redefine. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our R&D but our capability to cultivate. We will drive the ability of user communities to visualize. Think mega-collaborative. What does the term "fractal" really mean? The metrics for sticky, social-network-based accounting are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. We will target the term "compelling". What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "cyber-collaborative R&D" really mean? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for integrating. Imagine a combination of XSL and Rails. We think we know that it is better to monetize transparently than to optimize globally.