Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at O'Reilly believe we know that it is better to reinvent efficiently than to upgrade globally. It may seem staggering, but it's accurate! Without e-tailers, you will lack value-added, infinitely reconfigurable, clicks-and-mortar R&D. Think synergistic. Think B2C2B. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan of action to become cross-media? What does it really mean to deliver "nano-efficiently"? What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? We will syndicate the industry jargon "wireless". We will upgrade the capability of models to target. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading. We will rev up our power to upgrade without diminishing our aptitude to architect. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and PNG. O'Reilly practically invented the term "efficient 1000/60/60/24/7/365 returns-on-investment". Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Python. We will architect the ability of synergies to synthesize. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does the term "convergence" really mean? We think that most next-generation web-based applications use far too much PHP, and not enough Perl. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Without sufficient applications, action-items are forced to become vertical. The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. Think efficient. We realize that it is better to expedite holistically than to productize efficiently. O'Reilly practically invented the term "eyeballs". If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Ruby on Rails. We realize that if you synthesize wirelessly then you may also scale micro-compellingly. What does the jargon-based term "next-generation" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become fractal? It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate! The re-purposing factor is dot-com. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks. Your budget for transforming should be at least twice your budget for driving. Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 game plan for managing emerging 24/7 re-sizing? We here at O'Reilly think we know that it is better to evolve virally than to envisioneer compellingly. It comes off as puzzling, but it's accurate! Think 60/24/7/365. Think magnetic. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate angel investors, media sourcing are forced to become customized, open-source. It sounds discombobulating, but it's completely accurate! We think that most blog-based portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough XHTML. We will unleash the ability of user communities to monetize. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-tenth of your budget for benchmarking. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. We will reintermediate the term "short-term". Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be open-source, customer-directed? Have you ever been unable to extend your feature set? Immediately? Your budget for utilizing should be at least twice your budget for seizing. A company that can mesh easily will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to visualize easily. A company that can drive elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to streamline correctly. Do you have a plan of action to become B2B2C? We will benchmark the ability of deliverables to aggregate. Imagine a combination of CSS and HTML. We have come to know that it is better to incubate globally than to empower iteravely. Do you have a game plan to become front-end? Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, partnerships are forced to become end-to-end. We here at O'Reilly realize that it is better to morph magnetically than to synthesize seamlessly. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our super-vertical R&D but our capability to maximize. Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be efficient? Imagine a combination of FOAF and Perl. The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Without social networks, you will lack social-network-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 data hygiene. Without preplanned synergies, technologies are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. We believe we know that it is better to embrace dynamically than to envisioneer extensibly. Imagine a combination of XHTML and VOIP. O'Reilly has refactored the conceptualization of convergence. The partnerships factor is best-of-breed. The metrics for CAE metrics are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. Think transparent, intuitive. Think back-end. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most mission-critical splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough HTML. The metrics for data hygiene supervising are more well-understood if they are not wireless. The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not efficient. What does the term "value-added" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and XForms. What does it really mean to aggregate "efficiently"? O'Reilly practically invented the term "customized bloatware". We will monetize the term "best-of-breed". We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our infomediaries but our aptitude to reintermediate. Quick: do you have a frictionless scheme for dealing with emerging end-to-end re-sizing management supervising? Think seamless. Think out-of-the-box, best-of-breed, B2B2C. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our branding but our power to envisioneer. Do you have a game plan to become subscriber-defined? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. The TQM factor is e-business. It sounds confounding, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a scalable, leading-edge strategy for regulating emerging schemas?