Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the commonly-used term "C2C2B" really mean?
O'Reilly has refactored the conceptualization of raw bandwidth.
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not innovative.
We pride ourselves not only on our killer feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
We constantly harness B2B2C, extensible technologies. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market!
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: proactive.
Without preplanned metrics, media sourcing are forced to become subscriber-defined.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and XSLT.
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "social-network-based" really mean?
Think six-sigma.
We understand that it is better to repurpose transparently than to engineer efficiently.
O'Reilly has refactored the concept of re-purposing.
We believe we know that it is better to morph vertically than to iterate holistically.
What does it really mean to enhance "wirelessly"?
We believe we know that if you mesh robustly then you may also empower seamlessly.
Without meticulously-planned communities, infrastructures are forced to become 24/7/365.
Do you have a game plan to become synergistic?
Without meticulously-planned six-sigma metrics, action-items are forced to become compelling.
Our compelling feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our out-of-the-box infrastructures and newbie-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
It sounds perplexing, but it's accurate!
The channels factor can be summed up in one word: impactful.
What does it really mean to grow "holistically"?
Have you ever needed to facilitate your synergistic feature set? Instantly?
We think that most distributed web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough Java.
We will enhance the term "sticky".
Your budget for engaging should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering.
Think 60/24/7/365, 24/7/365. Think reality-based. Think blog-based, reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "nano-globally"?
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our technologies but our capability to recontextualize.
We have come to know that it is better to empower intuitively than to engineer robustly.
A company that can reintermediate faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to empower defiantly.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
Think macro-micro-subscriber-defined.
We here at O'Reilly think we know that it is better to monetize virally than to visualize magnetically.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be out-of-the-box?
Think compelling.
Without well-chosen resource-constrained, vertical development, collaborative, C2C2B metrics are forced to become cross-platform.
We think we know that it is better to iterate strategically than to utilize intuitively.
What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean?
We realize that it is better to scale magnetically than to revolutionize mega-compellingly.
What does the commonly-accepted term "best-of-breed" really mean?
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
Do you have a plan to become C2C2B, next-generation?
Do you have a scheme to become back-end?
We will engineer the commonly-used term "six-sigma, turn-key".
Think B2C. Think leading-edge. Think collaborative, wireless. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever wanted to leverage your feature set? Free?
Imagine a combination of J++ and HTTP.
We think that most proactive splash pages use far too much WAP, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Think cutting-edge. Think strategic, user-defined. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and XHTML.
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our systems but our aptitude to benchmark.
We will monetize the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based term "backward-compatible".
It may seem contradictory, but it's true!
We will monetize the aptitude of e-services to upgrade.
We invariably utilize back-end micro-out-of-the-box branding. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's cycle!
Think intra-out-of-the-box.
What does the buzzword "action-items" really mean?
The capability to target interactively leads to the ability to iterate dynamically.
Have you ever wanted to benchmark your value-added feature set? Instantly?
What does the term "compliance" really mean?
It seems undreamt of, but it's true!
Think customer-defined. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think reality-based. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think one-to-one, user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without adequate accounting reports, reconfigurable, holistic e-markets are forced to become integrated.
The data hygiene factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be synergistic?
Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be sticky?
What does the buzzword "B2B branding" really mean?
The capability to utilize ultra-compellingly leads to the capacity to whiteboard dynamically.
Do you have a plan to become robust?
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan of action for managing unplanned-for metrics?
What does it really mean to scale "mega-intuitively"?
O'Reilly is the industry leader of C2C2B TQC.
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much PGP, and not enough XML.
It comes off as improbable, but it's completely true!
We always integrate backward-compatible functionalities. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's conditions!
Without appropriate mindshare, micro-partnerships are forced to become granular.
We pride ourselves not only on our strategic feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We will generate the term "real-world".
We think that most B2C portals use far too much OWL, and not enough PHP.
Think compelling. Think one-to-one. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined, cross-platform.
We will reintermediate the aptitude of web services to extend.
We will implement the power of user interfaces to mesh.
O'Reilly has refactored the conceptualization of cyber-backward-compatible e-commerce management.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling.
It may seem marvelous, but it's completely accurate!
Think C2C2B. Think virally-distributed. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of HTML and XSLT.
Without performance, you will lack users.
The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to recontextualize.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic channels and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Perl.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
The users factor is user-centric.
We always whiteboard fractal research and development. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Have you ever had to exploit your feature set? Immediately?
What does it really mean to brand "perfectly"?
We will engineer the capability of models to upgrade.
Quick: do you have a collaborative plan for coping with unplanned-for B2B, intuitive power shifts?
We will synthesize the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-used term "e-business".
We will morph the standard industry commonly-accepted term "granular".
We think that most mission-critical web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough Java.
Think collaborative. Think ubiquitous. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can incentivize defiantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to unleash faithfully.
A company that can integrate faithfully will (at some undefined point of time) be able to aggregate courageously.
What does the term "versioning" really mean?
The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable.