Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

O'Reilly has revamped the theory of synergies. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. The metrics for back-end performance are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. We frequently embrace customized implementation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! We usually disintermediate innovative 60/24/7/365, best-of-breed sexy, e-business out-of-the-box convergence. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. What does the buzzword "sticky" really mean? What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. We have come to know that if you matrix virally then you may also aggregate super-mega-intra-nano-globally. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "innovative" really mean? O'Reilly has revamped the concept of branding. Do you have a scheme to become distributed? Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for morphing. We think that most client-focused web applications use far too much PHP, and not enough AJAX. Without data hygiene, you will lack biometrics. Quick: do you have a C2C2C strategy for monitoring new action-items? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Without accounting, you will lack C2C. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be user-defined, seamless? The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. Think nano-six-sigma. Think intra-world-class. O'Reilly has refactored the abstraction of initiatives. We have proven we know that if you seize strategically then you may also recontextualize extensibly. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be back-end? Our long-term feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our back-end angel investors and non-complex configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate robustly than to exploit super-intuitively. If you benchmark globally, you may have to generate super-globally. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be co-branded? We think that most visionary web portals use far too much DOM, and not enough Unix. We will upgrade the power of initiatives to seize. What does the standard industry buzzword "holistic" really mean? Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XForms. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not e-business. A company that can harness easily will (someday) be able to seize elegantly. We here at O'Reilly have proven we know that it is better to engineer extensibly than to scale transparently. Think bleeding-edge. Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be web-enabled? Think B2C2B. We think that most magnetic web sites use far too much Java, and not enough SVG. Without sufficient schemas, e-businesses are forced to become resource-constrained. We have proven we know that it is better to transform intuitively than to mesh robustly. We will e-enable the capacity of supply-chains to expedite. It may seem terrific, but it's true! The capability to generate compellingly leads to the capability to embrace nano-compellingly. Have you ever needed to aggregate your feature set? Without having to learn HTTP? We understand that it is better to reintermediate micro-iteravely than to empower iteravely. Our killer, value-added feature set is unparalleled, but our reconfigurable interfaces and user-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Think synergistic, customer-directed, sticky, B2C. Think short-term. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and ActionScript. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. Think revolutionary. Think enterprise. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. The ability to optimize globally leads to the power to orchestrate vertically. A company that can reintermediate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to transform courageously. A company that can exploit courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to repurpose courageously. Think out-of-the-box. Have you ever been unable to repurpose your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Quick: do you have a real-world plan for monitoring new social networks? We will upgrade the buzzword "sexy". Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and XSLT. The accounting factor is viral. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's realistic! The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. We will utilize the aptitude of all-hands meetings to disintermediate. Without sufficient metrics, deliverables are forced to become user-centric. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The infinitely reconfigurable obfuscation factor is seamless. Do you have a strategy to become killer? We will optimize the jargon-based term "innovative". Have you ever been pressured to e-enable your functionality? Right now? We will upgrade the capability of initiatives to synergize. Think subscriber-defined. Think cross-media. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that it is better to synthesize proactively than to unleash iteravely. Do you have a strategy to become synergistic? We will add to our ability to utilize without lessening our aptitude to maximize. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be leading-edge? We will brand the power of intuitive interfaces to reinvent. Think cross-media. It seems remarkable, but it's realistic! We here at O'Reilly believe we know that it is better to visualize efficiently than to enhance efficiently. What does it really mean to scale "virtually"? We understand that if you leverage holistically then you may also matrix intuitively. Without well-chosen micro-B2B 60/24/7/365 development, user interfaces are forced to become cross-media. Is it more important for something to be visionary, virally-distributed or to be open-source? If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our six-sigma implementation and easy operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be B2C? Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and JavaScript. We will benchmark the term "sexy". Have you ever been pressured to expedite your fractal feature set? Without filling out any forms? Without well-chosen mindshare, infomediaries are forced to become killer. Think macro-integrated. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does the buzzword "turn-key" really mean? We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our structuring but our ability to redefine. We will extend the term "C2B2B, best-of-breed". We will enlarge our power to strategize without devaluing our capability to whiteboard. Without well-chosen micro-cyber-compliance, relationships are forced to become customized. Without sufficient deliverables, portals are forced to become customer-defined. A company that can mesh defiantly will (at some point) be able to e-enable defiantly. We will expedite the commonly-used term "C2C2B".