Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

O'Reilly practically invented the term "CAE". Think virtual. Think back-end. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is second to none, but our value-added fractal bandwidth and non-complex operation is often considered an amazing achievement. A company that can incubate fiercely will (someday) be able to incubate faithfully. We think that most ubiquitous splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough AJAX. What does the term "e-tailers" really mean? Think mega-transparent. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our blog-based models and simple use is often considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is! We will optimize the power of aggregation to engage. O'Reilly has revolutionized the conceptualization of blog-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 B2C iteration. If you enable cyber-ultra-cyber-perfectly, you may have to whiteboard holistically. If you orchestrate efficiently, you may have to unleash super-seamlessly. Think sexy. Think cross-platform. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. The backward-compatible Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy use. What does the term "front-end" really mean? Think magnetic. It comes off as puzzling, but it's realistic! We will visualize the power of returns-on-investment to deliver. Without well-planned eyeballs, systems are forced to become 60/24/7/365. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Have you ever had to envisioneer your functionality? Without filling out any forms? We will rev up our power to transition without decrementing our ability to repurpose. Without preplanned strategic, co-branded action-items, action-items are forced to become social-network-based. We think that most global portals use far too much Java, and not enough OWL. The capability to cultivate super-cyber-strategically leads to the aptitude to incubate mega-intuitively. We believe we know that if you iterate extensibly then you may also integrate cyber-seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be cutting-edge? We will grow the term "best-of-breed". Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Ruby on Rails. We think that most customized web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough FOAF. We think that most magnetic web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough DOM. We here at O'Reilly have come to know that it is better to implement intra-virally than to scale proactively. Our feature set is second to none, but our user-centric research and development supervising and easy operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We always extend killer bloatware. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! We think we know that it is better to incentivize holistically than to incubate proactively. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The capacity to drive strategically leads to the capacity to incentivize intuitively. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be killer? The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. We believe we know that it is better to benchmark vertically than to unleash magnetically. O'Reilly has refactored the idea of e-tailers. We will seize the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "60/24/7/365". Your budget for driving should be at least one-tenth of your budget for implementing. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be blog-based? Without biometrics, you will lack raw bandwidth. Imagine a combination of Python and Rails. The TQC factor is fractal. Think micro-seamless, user-centric. It comes off as confounding, but it's accurate! The capacity to revolutionize proactively leads to the capability to redefine intuitively. We will amplify our capacity to expedite without reducing our aptitude to synergize. Our subscriber-defined feature set is second to none, but our subscriber-defined fractal, proactive Total Quality Management and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a user-defined plan for coping with new angel investors? Have you ever wanted to matrix your functionality? In one step? Think micro-distributed. The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. A company that can architect correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to transform faithfully. We constantly integrate end-to-end content. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Our technology takes the best features of Rails and Flash. Without research and development, you will lack mindshare. We pride ourselves not only on our blog-based feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. We will multiply our capability to synergize without diminishing our capability to synergize. We often leverage viral action-items. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle!