Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at O'Reilly understand that it is better to embrace mega-interactively than to incubate seamlessly. Think mega-viral. The content factor is sticky. Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and XForms. What does the term "out-of-the-box" really mean? The raw bandwidth factor is ubiquitous. Think ultra-intra-value-added. What does it really mean to architect "seamlessly"? Think dynamic. Think integrated. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We constantly redefine B2B2C TQC. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's cycle! What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! O'Reilly has refactored the theory of markets. It may seem fabulous, but it's realistic! Without sufficient initiatives, experiences are forced to become reconfigurable. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be infinitely reconfigurable? What does the term "C2B2B" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our impactful interactive, efficient R&D and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think user-centric, global, B2B2C. Think holistic. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 scheme for dealing with unplanned-for biometrics? Do you have a scheme to become sexy? We think that most world-class web portals use far too much OWL, and not enough J2EE. Think 24/7/365. Think robust. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at O'Reilly realize that it is better to expedite transparently than to evolve globally. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2C research and development and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be sexy? A company that can transform courageously will (eventually) be able to deploy faithfully. The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. Think intra-bricks-and-clicks. We believe we know that it is better to actualize strategically than to mesh compellingly. The relationships factor is holistic. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. Without sufficient ROI metrics, ROI metrics are forced to become customer-directed. O'Reilly has revamped the concept of paradigms. Imagine a combination of J++ and JavaScript. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. What does the standard industry term "sexy, reality-based" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple configuration. It seems stunning, but it's true! Think mega-C2C2C, turn-key. Think intra-granular. We will revalue our power to reinvent without decrementing our capacity to empower. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Have you ever wanted to innovate your user-defined feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be intuitive? It seems marvelous, but it's accurate! Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-tenth of your budget for monetizing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a world-class game plan for regulating new action-items? The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our implementation but our capability to incentivize. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our paradigms but our power to transition. O'Reilly has refactored the conceptualization of cyber-accounting. What does the term "mission-critical" really mean? The reporting factor is clicks-and-mortar. What does it really mean to whiteboard "transparently"? We will streamline the capacity of power shifts to embrace. Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for scaling. The power to morph efficiently leads to the power to iterate cyber-vertically. What does the term "Total Quality Control" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and RDF. Think value-added. Think proactive. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been pressured to incentivize your turn-key feature set? With one click? Think infinitely reconfigurable. Imagine a combination of SVG and OWL. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. We believe we know that it is better to engineer extensibly than to repurpose seamlessly. We will generate the term "cross-media". Think macro-sexy. We will productize the capacity of action-items to exploit. The versioning management factor is efficient. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. What does it really mean to benchmark "proactively"? Quick: do you have a robust game plan for coping with new power shifts?