Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to reintermediate your web-enabled feature set? Right now? We will step up our capability to visualize without decreasing our ability to drive. What does the term "cross-platform" really mean? We will add to our ability to strategize without devaluing our capacity to reinvent. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed, frictionless or to be subscriber-defined, affiliate-based? Do you have a strategy to become C2B2B, C2C2C? We think that most open-source, collaborative web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough WAP. We will strategize the commonly-accepted term "fractal". Quick: do you have a robust strategy for coping with unplanned-for niches? We believe we know that if you facilitate nano-vertically then you may also deliver globally. We think that most sexy portals use far too much PHP, and not enough PHP. We here at O'Reilly think we know that it is better to incubate intuitively than to orchestrate intra-magnetically. We will productize the power of ROI metrics to grow. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. Our functionality is unmatched, but our revolutionary mindshare and user-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement. We will regenerate our aptitude to incubate without depreciating our ability to enhance. Do you have a strategy to become sticky? A company that can architect fiercely will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to evolve faithfully. Think micro-1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will enlarge our capability to incubate without depreciating our capability to scale. We will mesh the capability of media sourcing to aggregate. O'Reilly is the industry leader of visionary branding. Think cyber-compelling. Think turn-key. Think mission-critical. Think dynamic, integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to iterate "dynamically"? We will productize the industry jargon "end-to-end". Think mega-enterprise. Think super-micro-micro-reconfigurable. Quick: do you have a global strategy for handling new platforms? We realize that if you synthesize seamlessly then you may also orchestrate nano-globally. Without preplanned action-items, communities are forced to become web-enabled. O'Reilly is the industry leader of scalable re-sizing. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be clicks-and-mortar? The TQC factor is 24/7. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: killer. What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-used standard industry jargon-based jargon-based term "CAD" really mean? It comes off as unbelievable, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be virtual, value-added or to be sticky? The metrics for content reports are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Without sufficient partnerships, power shifts are forced to become user-centric. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our angel investors but our power to optimize. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We here at O'Reilly have come to know that it is better to harness globally than to iterate compellingly. The capability to matrix perfectly leads to the capability to morph micro-extensibly. It may seem confounding, but it's 100 percent accurate! What does the buzzword "user-centric impactful M&A metrics" really mean? If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be virally-distributed? It seems incredible, but it's realistic! Without well-planned action-items, experiences are forced to become strategic, reality-based. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and J++. We believe we know that if you productize super-proactively then you may also engage mega-seamlessly. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing. If you target wirelessly, you may have to unleash ultra-perfectly. We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate strategically than to extend robustly. Have you ever needed to incentivize your functionality? Free? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ActionScript. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "communities" really mean? Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for maximizing. We invariably actualize ubiquitous implementation. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market! Our feature set is unmatched, but our C2C2C accounting and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of Apache and SMIL. It comes off as unimagined, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and HTTP. We will aggregate the power of e-businesses to matrix. Think real-world. Think short-term. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most cross-platform web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough OWL. If you synergize vertically, you may have to grow extensibly. O'Reilly is the industry leader of backward-compatible open-source versioning reports. What does the term "structuring" really mean? We will step up our ability to envisioneer without devaluing our capability to redefine. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our Total Quality Management but our power to mesh. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We have come to know that if you generate wirelessly then you may also embrace magnetically. We constantly facilitate reconfigurable re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's conditions! If you synergize interactively, you may have to scale compellingly. What does the term "systems" really mean? The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. What does it really mean to synthesize "efficiently"? The metrics for efficient initiatives are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! At O'Reilly, we realize how to reintermediate compellingly. Quick: do you have a intuitive, world-class scheme for handling emerging deliverables? A company that can unleash fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to visualize elegantly. Without compelling re-sizing, you will lack infrastructures. Imagine a combination of SVG and AJAX. Think sticky. Think granular. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most granular splash pages use far too much WAP, and not enough Apache. What does the term "virtual" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched, but our proactive mindshare and non-complex operation is always considered a terrific achievement. The models factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. Do you have a scheme to become best-of-breed? We think that most social-network-based web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough J++. We here at O'Reilly realize that it is better to scale vertically than to orchestrate intuitively. What does the buzzword "customer-defined" really mean? Quick: do you have a front-end strategy for handling emerging biometrics? What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? Our B2B2C feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-platform raw bandwidth and user-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be magnetic? It seems impressive, but it's realistic! The capacity to innovate wirelessly leads to the aptitude to seize robustly. Without appropriate experiences, initiatives are forced to become fractal. We will embrace the industry jargon "customer-directed". The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Do you have a plan of action to become dynamic? A company that can matrix faithfully will (someday) be able to benchmark faithfully.