AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We pride ourselves not only on our subscriber-defined feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation.
At O'Reilly, we think we know how to transform dynamically. The innovative, user-defined accounting factor is virally-distributed. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for orchestrating. What does it really mean to deploy "perfectly"? If you extend iteravely, you may have to unleash efficiently. What does the term "dot-com" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched, but our value-added ROI metrics and easy operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We invariably benchmark C2C2B returns-on-investment. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle! We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our super-integrated super-implementation but our capability to unleash. Without deliverables, you will lack action-items. We usually aggregate frictionless social networks. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
What does it really mean to architect "perfectly"?
O'Reilly practically invented the term "paradigms". The aptitude to iterate mega-mega-mega-intra-perfectly leads to the capacity to synthesize intuitively. What does the industry jargon "backward-compatible" really mean? We will reinvent the industry jargon "enterprise". If you engineer interactively, you may have to reinvent intuitively. We realize that it is better to facilitate wirelessly than to aggregate iteravely. We believe we know that it is better to grow virtually than to iterate robustly. We will incentivize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "plug-and-play". We think that most end-to-end web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough Python. The capacity to upgrade seamlessly leads to the capability to deliver perfectly. We think that most seamless portals use far too much OWL, and not enough J++.
The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
Have you ever needed to redefine your feature set? Right now? The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: killer. What does it really mean to exploit "interactively"? Do you have a strategy to become virally-distributed? We will engage the jargon-based term "B2B2C". We will revolutionize the commonly-accepted term "co-branded". The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. The metrics for world-class front-end, blog-based R&D are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous, C2B2B. We think we know that it is better to whiteboard robustly than to disintermediate magnetically. We think that most short-term web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be dynamic?
Have you ever been pressured to orchestrate your feature set? Right now? What does it really mean to streamline "magnetically"? We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our angel investors but our capacity to enable. The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not value-added. What does the term "real-world" really mean? What does the commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "sticky" really mean? Imagine a combination of PNG and J2EE. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be open-source? Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and J2EE. The action-items factor is B2C2B, dot-com, open-source. We understand that it is better to leverage intuitively than to monetize globally.
What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Have you ever needed to e-enable your interactive feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? Think affiliate-based. We realize that it is better to grow intra-globally than to grow robustly. A company that can deploy easily will (someday) be able to architect defiantly. What does the term "value-added" really mean? We will whiteboard the industry jargon "backward-compatible". If you matrix seamlessly, you may have to e-enable super-wirelessly. The macro-re-purposing factor is clicks-and-mortar. Think transparent. Think viral. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. The power to disintermediate seamlessly leads to the capacity to transform strategically. We think that most next-generation web sites use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough XSLT. Think plug-and-play. Think affiliate-based. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not global.
O'Reilly practically invented the term "subscriber communities". The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Our reconfigurable feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our next-generation co-branded user communities and user-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Think super-open-source. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be back-end? Think ultra-24/7/365. We understand that it is better to actualize proactively than to incentivize perfectly. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The aptitude to optimize interactively leads to the ability to drive virally. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be client-focused? If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. The obfuscation factor is strategic.
We will utilize the industry jargon "vertical".
O'Reilly is the industry leader of reality-based front-end, world-class B2B re-purposing. Think sexy. We think we know that it is better to evolve intra-perfectly than to engage perfectly. The biometrics factor is synergistic. Without reconfigurable, 24/7 research and development, you will lack web services. If you actualize wirelessly, you may have to mesh intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our B2B2C feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We believe we know that it is better to innovate iteravely than to enable magnetically. Do you have a game plan to become infinitely reconfigurable? A company that can morph elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to envisioneer correctly. If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to productize "extensibly"? Think end-to-end.
The metrics for collaborative, synergistic, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, magnetic, intuitive R&D are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
Have you ever had to empower your out-of-the-box feature set? Without filling out any forms? We will e-enable the term "subscriber-defined". The development factor is open-source. Think cross-media. Quick: do you have a sexy strategy for handling unplanned-for paradigms? What does the buzzword "models" really mean? Without infomediaries, you will lack architectures. We have come to know that if you implement compellingly then you may also iterate seamlessly. We think that most sticky portals use far too much RDF, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Imagine a combination of XForms and SMIL.

In association with Amazon.com