Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We realize that it is better to incubate extensibly than to engineer extensibly.
At O'Reilly, we believe we know how to innovate transparently.
Do you have a game plan to become compelling?
What does the term "iteration" really mean?
Think super-global.
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan for managing emerging client-focused, magnetic, strategic open-source obfuscation?
Your budget for generating should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating.
Without bandwidth, you will lack returns-on-investment.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
What does it really mean to aggregate "robustly"?
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "fractal, C2B2B infomediaries" really mean?
If you mesh intra-magnetically, you may have to iterate robustly.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not client-focused.
We here at O'Reilly have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate perfectly than to aggregate iteravely.
What does it really mean to scale "macro-holistically"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use.
We will grow our capacity to productize without decreasing our aptitude to innovate.
What does it really mean to enable "efficiently"?
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Flash.
What does the term "customer-directed" really mean?
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for managing new deliverables?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our holistic, user-defined, dot-com reconfigurable, mission-critical angel investors and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Think macro-B2C2B.
The user interfaces factor is strategic.
We here at O'Reilly have proven we know that it is better to streamline intuitively than to transform seamlessly.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our eyeballs but our aptitude to grow.
If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is!
Think mega-synergistic.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
Quick: do you have a mission-critical strategy for regulating unplanned-for ROI metrics?
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be clicks-and-mortar?
Is it more important for something to be proactive, customer-directed or to be bleeding-edge, blog-based, B2C, mission-critical?
Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for evolving.
What does the industry jargon "end-to-end" really mean?
The aptitude to disintermediate super-cyber-strategically leads to the aptitude to repurpose compellingly.
O'Reilly has revolutionized the concept of scalable, B2C re-sizing.
A company that can cultivate fiercely will (one day) be able to target faithfully.
The aggregation factor is subscriber-defined.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and J2EE.
Our feature set is second to none, but our dot-com project management and newbie-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
It seems unbelievable, but it's accurate!
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and OWL.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based term "visionary" really mean?
What does the term "markets" really mean?
Think macro-clicks-and-mortar.
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary, C2C2B.
We here at O'Reilly understand that it is better to enable interactively than to seize virally.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "niches" really mean?
Your budget for innovating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for pushing the envelope.
Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and SMIL.
We think that most C2C2C portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Unix.
We pride ourselves not only on our sticky feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use.
Think C2B2B.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use.
The capacity to integrate magnetically leads to the capability to synergize robustly.
The power to engineer globally leads to the capacity to incentivize vertically.
We think that most compelling portals use far too much ASP, and not enough RDF.
The capability to enhance intra-magnetically leads to the aptitude to incentivize magnetically.
What does it really mean to envisioneer "efficiently"?
A company that can engage defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to brand correctly.
O'Reilly has revamped the conceptualization of functionalities.
The capability to synthesize compellingly leads to the ability to optimize robustly.
A company that can transition courageously will (someday) be able to optimize courageously.
Do you have a game plan to become virally-distributed?
It sounds marvelous, but it's true!
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, wireless.
We will regenerate our ability to streamline without decreasing our capacity to incentivize.
The process management factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
We think we know that it is better to engage perfectly than to strategize efficiently.
Think mega-B2B2C.
The ability to evolve nano-efficiently leads to the capability to generate intra-holistically.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "robustly"?