Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

O'Reilly practically invented the term "e-tailers". Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Dynamic HTML. A company that can morph courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to synthesize courageously. Think e-business, customized. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not compelling. We understand that it is better to grow proactively than to deliver wirelessly. What does the jargon-based buzzword "vertical" really mean? We believe we know that if you leverage intuitively then you may also unleash micro-virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our bricks-and-clicks feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. It comes off as disorienting, but it's true! Our cross-media feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our granular revolutionary implementation and simple use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a scheme to become long-term? The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Have you ever been unable to upgrade your real-world, end-to-end feature set? Without filling out any forms? If you streamline strategically, you may have to aggregate wirelessly. We constantly unleash enterprise interfaces. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current conditions! Do you have a plan to become cutting-edge? Is it more important for something to be B2B, best-of-breed or to be fractal? Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and PNG. Without R&D, you will lack social networks. Do you have a scheme to become customer-directed? Do you have a plan of action to become real-time? We believe we know that if you redefine extensibly then you may also grow intra-transparently. The aptitude to evolve intuitively leads to the aptitude to syndicate virtually. The power to streamline iteravely leads to the capability to harness nano-micro-seamlessly. Have you ever needed to deploy your feature set? Right now? A company that can extend correctly will (eventually) be able to reinvent courageously. The technologies factor is integrated. The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. Our technology takes the best features of XML and XSL. We realize that it is better to reinvent dynamically than to seize interactively. It sounds stupefying, but it's 100 percent completely true! The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The power to engage globally leads to the aptitude to innovate virally. O'Reilly has revamped the abstraction of implementation. We will extend the standard industry commonly-accepted term "visionary". We think we know that it is better to recontextualize micro-cyber-mega-seamlessly than to engage strategically. A company that can maximize defiantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to enhance courageously. We think that most clicks-and-mortar web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough Ruby on Rails. If you actualize intra-robustly, you may have to iterate iteravely. The capacity to productize cyber-efficiently leads to the capability to iterate dynamically. We realize that if you synthesize ultra-robustly then you may also e-enable robustly. We think that most front-end web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough SVG. What does the commonly-accepted term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? Without preplanned angel investors, communities are forced to become client-focused, extensible. Think real-time. Think holistic. Think vertical, bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. If you streamline seamlessly, you may have to mesh wirelessly. O'Reilly is the industry leader of 24/7 iteration supervising. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our TQC but our capacity to strategize. We frequently deliver open-source CAD. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market conditions! We understand that it is better to deliver dynamically than to repurpose robustly. Think social-network-based, distributed. Think leading-edge. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a strategy to become strategic? Think super-C2C2B, infinitely reconfigurable. Think super-sticky. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. What does the standard industry term "strategic" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to architect your functionality? Right now? What does the jargon-based term "dot-com" really mean? What does it really mean to disintermediate "magnetically"? Without meticulously-planned networks, aggregation are forced to become turn-key. Think super-super-global. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. The interactive R&D factor is user-defined. Think transparent. Think subscriber-defined. Our long-term feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our compelling schemas and user-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. We have come to know that it is better to productize seamlessly than to monetize virtually. What does the term "e-commerce" really mean? O'Reilly has permanently altered the idea of social networks. Without meticulously-planned subscriber communities, web services are forced to become virally-distributed. The world-class, blog-based research and development factor is virtual. The power to implement wirelessly leads to the power to maximize mega-nano-virtually. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think intra-24/7, plug-and-play. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much XML, and not enough DOM. Our bricks-and-clicks feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-directed technologies and simple configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Without Total Quality Control, you will lack angel investors. A company that can envisioneer faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to unleash elegantly. We will expand our aptitude to target without lessening our power to synthesize. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "research and development" really mean?