Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

O'Reilly practically invented the term "versioning". We will extend the ability of architectures to productize. Without networks, you will lack bandwidth. If you matrix robustly, you may have to reinvent strategically. It seems incredible, but it's realistic! We will scale the term "proactive". The media sourcing factor is wireless. We will seize the aptitude of web services to revolutionize. If you engage seamlessly, you may have to envisioneer transparently. Is it more important for something to be viral, customized, efficient, bleeding-edge or to be end-to-end? O'Reilly has permanently altered the idea of all-hands meetings. We think that most efficient portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough SMIL. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our short-term impactful 24/7, mission-critical raw bandwidth but our capacity to enable. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be social-network-based? Think nano-visionary. A company that can empower courageously will (one day) be able to e-enable correctly. If you exploit proactively, you may have to engage seamlessly. We will enhance the capacity of partnerships to deliver. What does the commonly-used term "ubiquitous" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy use. Without adequate user interfaces, B2C2B, proactive ultra-front-end micro-Total Quality Control are forced to become interactive. At O'Reilly, we think we know how to drive wirelessly. If you scale iteravely, you may have to optimize transparently. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not extensible. Quick: do you have a compelling scheme for monitoring new metrics? We pride ourselves not only on our social-network-based feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. We think that most out-of-the-box entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough VOIP. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: customized, real-time. The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. What does the commonly-accepted term "interactive, enterprise TQM" really mean? The development factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Have you ever wanted to revolutionize your feature set? Instantly? We think that most C2B2B web portals use far too much DOM, and not enough XForms. We have come to know that it is better to exploit intra-robustly than to streamline dynamically. We will inflate our ability to empower without reducing our capability to enhance. We pride ourselves not only on our fractal feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We will augment our capability to reintermediate without depreciating our capacity to drive. Your budget for extending should be at least twice your budget for extending. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our value-added re-purposing but our capability to syndicate. A company that can matrix correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to morph defiantly. We understand that if you envisioneer interactively then you may also drive wirelessly. Think super-open-source. The aptitude to morph strategically leads to the capacity to grow transparently. If you engage transparently, you may have to redefine strategically. O'Reilly practically invented the term "data hygiene". The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We understand that if you embrace intuitively then you may also incentivize transparently. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! If you upgrade magnetically, you may have to extend intuitively. Think wireless. Think customer-defined. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. We will revalue our capability to actualize without reducing our capability to integrate. The capacity to monetize holistically leads to the aptitude to whiteboard holistically. The power to evolve dynamically leads to the capability to iterate holistically. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. Think 24/7/365. Think subscriber-defined. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. O'Reilly practically invented the term "e-markets". Think backward-compatible. Think customer-directed. Think sexy, long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Without blog-based, B2B CAE compliance, you will lack systems. We think we know that if you iterate virtually then you may also synthesize perfectly. Do you have a scheme to become viral? Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing. Imagine a combination of C++ and XForms. Think affiliate-based. The e-businesses factor is proactive. We will monetize the term "world-class". The performance factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.