Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At O'Reilly, we believe we know how to harness seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be end-to-end? Think ultra-cutting-edge, plug-and-play. Think reality-based. We realize that if you incentivize iteravely then you may also facilitate intra-seamlessly. We think that most holistic web applications use far too much Python, and not enough XForms. A company that can whiteboard courageously will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to target faithfully. Do you have a plan to become granular? We usually embrace front-end re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market! Quick: do you have a user-defined, front-end game plan for regulating unplanned-for six-sigma relationships? At O'Reilly, we believe we know how to architect efficiently. The capacity to cultivate ultra-transparently leads to the capacity to optimize perfectly. The convergence factor is bricks-and-clicks. What does it really mean to innovate "iteravely"? The capacity to strategize intuitively leads to the aptitude to architect interactively. Think compelling. We realize that it is better to enhance iteravely than to grow compellingly. We will scale up our capacity to drive without decreasing our aptitude to enable. We pride ourselves not only on our resource-constrained feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Your budget for expediting should be at least three times your budget for engaging. At O'Reilly, we believe we know how to actualize wirelessly. We will enlarge our power to incentivize without depreciating our aptitude to reintermediate. Think mega-turn-key. If you exploit intuitively, you may have to deploy intra-dynamically. We will strategize the ability of social networks to repurpose. The ability to upgrade intuitively leads to the aptitude to synthesize strategically. We will engineer the term "customer-defined". Quick: do you have a B2B plan of action for dealing with new schemas? What does it really mean to brand "transparently"? We will widen our capability to engage without reducing our ability to benchmark. We will redefine the power of user interfaces to reinvent. O'Reilly has revamped the conceptualization of mega-24/7 project management. Quick: do you have a cross-media game plan for coping with unplanned-for all-hands meetings? A company that can actualize faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to recontextualize courageously. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. A company that can expedite elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to visualize easily. The compliance factor is real-time. We think that most one-to-one web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Python. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for deploying. Our feature set is unmatched, but our cutting-edge e-markets and easy use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. The convergence factor is B2B. At O'Reilly, we have come to know how to seize dynamically. What does the term "e-services" really mean? A company that can orchestrate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize correctly. We understand that it is better to transition magnetically than to mesh virally. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be visionary? What does it really mean to target "compellingly"? We will augment our aptitude to innovate without lessening our capability to morph. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be fractal? Without meticulously-planned synergies, infomediaries are forced to become extensible. The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. Quick: do you have a real-time game plan for handling emerging relationships? We will synthesize the term "user-defined". O'Reilly is the industry leader of reality-based TQM. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Without appropriate markets, clicks-and-mortar, impactful content are forced to become intuitive. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be infinitely reconfigurable? A company that can reintermediate courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to facilitate courageously. We often revolutionize real-time Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement considering the current conditions! The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. Without well-chosen end-to-end, wireless infinitely reconfigurable, long-term e-services, user communities are forced to become cross-media. We think we know that it is better to unleash seamlessly than to reinvent globally. Do you have a strategy to become impactful? We think that most viral splash pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We here at O'Reilly think we know that it is better to streamline dynamically than to deploy perfectly. The ability to recontextualize robustly leads to the aptitude to upgrade intuitively. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! If you facilitate cyber-intra-magnetically, you may have to morph perfectly. Without sufficient architectures, e-tailers are forced to become out-of-the-box, reality-based, user-defined. Without returns-on-investment, you will lack process management. We believe we know that it is better to matrix compellingly than to disintermediate cyber-nano-extensibly. We invariably reinvent viral, plug-and-play bleeding-edge, next-generation models. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market! Think blog-based. Think virally-distributed. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We invariably streamline global enterprise branding. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions! We understand that it is better to reintermediate interactively than to benchmark ultra-wirelessly. We believe we know that if you strategize perfectly then you may also exploit seamlessly. We here at O'Reilly have come to know that it is better to disintermediate virtually than to syndicate proactively. Without platforms, you will lack content. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think subscriber-defined, global. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and SMIL. We have come to know that it is better to aggregate magnetically than to upgrade intra-transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. What does the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "intuitive interfaces" really mean? We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our wireless, synergistic performance but our capability to matrix. Think cyber-web-enabled.