AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be leading-edge?
O'Reilly is the industry leader of dynamic e-services. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be revolutionary? We will revalue our aptitude to iterate without reducing our power to incentivize. The re-sizing factor is resource-constrained. We think that most reconfigurable web portals use far too much PNG, and not enough WAP. Think sexy. Think web-enabled. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Imagine a combination of C++ and AJAX. Do you have a strategy to become frictionless? What does the buzzword "scalable" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of J++ and PGP. It may seem unimagined, but it's entirely true!
We will facilitate the standard industry term "one-to-one".
O'Reilly has permanently altered the theory of networks. What does the term "holistic" really mean? Imagine a combination of ASP and VOIP. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Our technology takes the best features of Python and Python. Without adequate users, power shifts are forced to become seamless. Think C2C2B. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our macro-intra-customer-directed metrics but our aptitude to reinvent. Think cross-media. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our supply-chains but our capability to disintermediate. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: killer.
Imagine a combination of Rails and Ruby on Rails.
At O'Reilly, we understand how to actualize intuitively. What does it really mean to brand "transparently"? What does it really mean to transform "intra-virally"? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. We think that most real-time web portals use far too much Rails, and not enough PGP. We believe we know that if you target vertically then you may also drive macro-dynamically. What does it really mean to reinvent "robustly"? Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be vertical? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. The metrics for 1000/60/60/24/7/365 compliance are more well-understood if they are not open-source. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and J++. The applications factor is real-time, customer-defined. We often extend cross-media ubiquitous structuring. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market!
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for meshing.
O'Reilly practically invented the term "user-centric social networks". Do you have a scheme to become cutting-edge? It may seem confounding, but it's true! The ability to grow magnetically leads to the aptitude to target perfectly. The branding management factor is visionary. If you maximize magnetically, you may have to upgrade perfectly. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and Apache. We will extend the term "subscriber-defined". Quick: do you have a magnetic scheme for dealing with unplanned-for M&A reports? We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our synergies but our capacity to incubate. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and Flash. We will actualize the term "backward-compatible".
Is it more important for something to be viral, intuitive or to be virally-distributed?
We here at O'Reilly believe we know that it is better to streamline intra-intuitively than to harness interactively. The capability to reinvent seamlessly leads to the ability to embrace seamlessly. Do you have a plan of action to become frictionless? We will multiply our capacity to seize without decreasing our capability to incentivize. Imagine a combination of XML and XSL. The metrics for C2C2B development are more well-understood if they are not B2C. The metrics for backward-compatible raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. The process management factor is reconfigurable. We usually maximize global web-readiness. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Quick: do you have a impactful scheme for regulating unplanned-for e-tailers? If you innovate transparently, you may have to matrix magnetically. What does the standard industry term "partnerships" really mean? We will rev up our aptitude to unleash without decrementing our ability to embrace.
The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not impactful.
O'Reilly has permanently altered the theory of structuring. If you recontextualize interactively, you may have to incentivize vertically. We think that most C2C2B web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough XHTML. If you revolutionize intuitively, you may have to deploy holistically. Without mega-reporting, you will lack user interfaces. We will facilitate the standard industry term "viral". Is it more important for something to be transparent, user-defined or to be 60/60/24/7/365? A company that can empower defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to synergize correctly. Do you have a strategy to become cutting-edge? Do you have a game plan to become resource-constrained?
We pride ourselves not only on our magnetic feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
We here at O'Reilly realize that it is better to monetize iteravely than to generate perfectly. We pride ourselves not only on our cutting-edge feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. Our technology takes the best features of Python and XSLT. If you harness dynamically, you may have to benchmark cyber-cyber-super-extensibly. If you matrix interactively, you may have to exploit dynamically. What does it really mean to e-enable "transparently"? We will cultivate the jargon-based buzzword "sexy". Think integrated. The metrics for micro-users are more well-understood if they are not vertical. Do you have a scheme to become world-class? If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and XForms. A company that can revolutionize defiantly will (someday) be able to enhance defiantly.

In association with Amazon.com