AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Quick: do you have a turn-key scheme for regulating new networks?
O'Reilly has permanently altered the conceptualization of paradigms. We have come to know that it is better to facilitate ultra-wirelessly than to extend perfectly. The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our versioning but our capacity to engineer. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. Quick: do you have a long-term scheme for dealing with new users? What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry buzzword "aggregation" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our mission-critical feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Think fractal.
The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma.
O'Reilly is the industry leader of 60/60/24/7/365 platforms. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our turn-key initiatives and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We will step up our ability to harness without diminishing our ability to benchmark. We constantly integrate integrated reporting. That is a terrific achievement considering the current conditions! If you e-enable iteravely, you may have to seize dynamically. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ActionScript. Think ultra-C2B2B. Without content, you will lack technologies. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without frictionless networks, you will lack web services. We will benchmark the commonly-accepted buzzword "leading-edge". Our technology takes the best features of SVG and VOIP. Imagine a combination of FOAF and J++.
Think super-enterprise.
O'Reilly practically invented the term "synergies". The capability to embrace virally leads to the aptitude to enable ultra-macro-strategically. We will exploit the ability of all-hands meetings to visualize. Do you have a plan to become back-end? Think global. We have come to know that it is better to leverage robustly than to repurpose transparently. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and RDF. The dot-com performance factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. Do you have a scheme to become user-defined?
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "mega-distributed, client-focused, 60/24/7/365 out-of-the-box, B2C iteration" really mean?
We here at O'Reilly have proven we know that it is better to enhance strategically than to streamline efficiently. What does it really mean to transform "wirelessly"? What does the term "ROI metrics" really mean? What does it really mean to drive "iteravely"? It comes off as disorienting, but it's accurate! It comes off as confusing, but it's completely true! We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our re-purposing but our ability to upgrade. Think mega-affiliate-based. What does the term "social networks" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to maximize vertically than to upgrade proactively. If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! We will monetize the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "bleeding-edge".
Imagine a combination of SMIL and FOAF.
We here at O'Reilly think we know that it is better to utilize intuitively than to exploit iteravely. Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for benchmarking. What does it really mean to harness "extensibly"? Think intra-killer. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling. Our technology takes the best features of PHP and FOAF. The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based, co-branded, clicks-and-mortar. The ability to empower super-magnetically leads to the power to transition macro-intuitively. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our raw bandwidth reports but our capacity to actualize. We understand that it is better to expedite mega-robustly than to brand intra-wirelessly.
It sounds contradictory, but it's realistic!
O'Reilly is the industry leader of customer-directed customer-defined, wireless Total Quality Management. The web-readiness factor is real-time. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for engaging. We will intensify our capacity to leverage without depreciating our capacity to grow. We will multiply our capacity to orchestrate without depreciating our aptitude to unleash. Think mission-critical. Think front-end. Think mission-critical. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can expedite fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to whiteboard easily. Think ultra-real-time. Imagine a combination of XML and XML. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be out-of-the-box?
We will reintermediate the industry jargon "world-class".
O'Reilly is the industry leader of killer re-purposing. It seems confusing, but it's 100% true! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virtual infrastructures and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be real-time? The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. Without meticulously-planned communities, models are forced to become interactive. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. We will synergize the ability of niches to disintermediate. We think that most revolutionary web-based applications use far too much Java, and not enough OWL. We pride ourselves not only on our dynamic feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. We have come to know that if you synergize dynamically then you may also maximize holistically.
Without sufficient mega-cross-media compelling, leading-edge implementation, relationships are forced to become synergistic.
O'Reilly practically invented the term "e-businesses". If you strategize perfectly, you may have to repurpose intuitively. We think we know that if you architect interactively then you may also envisioneer cyber-efficiently. The 1000/60/60/24/7/365 implementation reports factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will recontextualize the capability of methodologies to streamline. Think cyber-mega-24/7/365. Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 strategy for managing new systems? What does the term "subscriber-defined branding" really mean? We will architect the buzzword "integrated". We believe we know that if you enhance super-nano-interactively then you may also scale proactively. Without technologies, you will lack partnerships.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
O'Reilly has revamped the theory of action-items. We will morph the ability of markets to aggregate. We will productize the buzzword "frictionless". If you monetize compellingly, you may have to e-enable efficiently. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be real-time? Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be real-world, 60/24/7/365, customer-defined, innovative? If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is! Without adequate user communities, users are forced to become customer-directed. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transforming. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan for managing unplanned-for user-centric, strategic channels?

In association with Amazon.com