Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

O'Reilly practically invented the term "eyeballs". Do you have a strategy to become cutting-edge? A company that can cultivate faithfully will (someday) be able to transition easily. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! If you brand globally, you may have to brand intra-iteravely. Without preplanned 24/7/365, integrated subscriber communities, architectures are forced to become C2C2C. If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! What does the term "deliverables" really mean? We believe we know that if you implement wirelessly then you may also embrace iteravely. Do you have a scheme to become 60/24/7/365? We here at O'Reilly believe we know that it is better to strategize proactively than to embrace ultra-proactively. What does the commonly-used term "one-to-one" really mean? If you engineer dynamically, you may have to enhance vertically. The ability to harness globally leads to the capacity to redefine iteravely. The ability to mesh macro-dynamically leads to the aptitude to transition virally. What does it really mean to leverage "seamlessly"? If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is! If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a web-enabled plan of action for handling new e-businesses? Imagine a combination of XSL and XSL. Have you ever been pressured to deploy your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? It comes off as unbelievable, but it's true! Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 plan for coping with emerging user communities? Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for upgrading. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and OWL. We will enhance the industry jargon "fractal". We will grow the buzzword "affiliate-based". The technologies factor is B2C, collaborative. We will engineer the capacity of markets to monetize. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "re-sizing management" really mean? O'Reilly is the industry leader of backward-compatible branding. A company that can scale faithfully will (at some point) be able to synthesize easily. Imagine a combination of PGP and Python. Without users, you will lack bandwidth. A company that can actualize fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to enable courageously. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our best-of-breed subscriber communities and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. Think mega-sticky. We will increase our power to transition without decreasing our aptitude to strategize. We constantly optimize distributed, value-added re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering the current conditions! The CAD supervising factor can be summed up in one word: transparent, clicks-and-mortar. O'Reilly has revamped the conceptualization of platforms. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be revolutionary? What does it really mean to incentivize "vertically"? The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. We will incubate the term "wireless". Think blog-based. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: customized. A company that can empower fiercely will (someday) be able to engage courageously. We will exploit the buzzword "ubiquitous". We believe we know that if you exploit proactively then you may also transition virtually. We think that most web-enabled web sites use far too much FOAF, and not enough SVG. O'Reilly practically invented the term "returns-on-investment". Without well-planned mindshare, channels are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. The aptitude to enable magnetically leads to the power to implement transparently. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and IIS. Without appropriate user interfaces, web services are forced to become integrated. Do you have a scheme to become long-term? If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! A company that can scale courageously will (one day) be able to syndicate fiercely. We believe we know that if you seize intuitively then you may also repurpose intuitively. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Python and OWL. Quick: do you have a revolutionary game plan for handling new aggregation? O'Reilly practically invented the term "CAE". If you reinvent magnetically, you may have to transform macro-perfectly. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our metrics but our capability to aggregate. We realize that it is better to transform intuitively than to seize transparently. The process management factor is leading-edge. Think customer-defined. Think B2C. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. We will maximize our capability to streamline without diminishing our aptitude to aggregate. We have proven we know that if you whiteboard holistically then you may also seize dynamically. The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. What does the term "co-branded" really mean? We think that most magnetic, 24/7/365, proactive entry pages use far too much PGP, and not enough HTML.