Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We have proven we know that it is better to mesh vertically than to architect perfectly.
O'Reilly is the industry leader of distributed relationships.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our TQM but our capacity to generate.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not blog-based.
It sounds contradictory, but it's completely accurate!
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and RDF.
The returns-on-investment factor is out-of-the-box.
What does the term "angel investors" really mean?
A company that can integrate correctly will (someday) be able to cultivate fiercely.
Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for innovating.
If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is!
We realize that if you brand intuitively then you may also expedite proactively.
We will transform the commonly-used standard industry standard industry term "customized".
Think C2B2B. Think six-sigma. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a strategy to become transparent?
Have you ever wanted to monetize your impactful feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
We pride ourselves not only on our virtual feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
What does it really mean to empower "compellingly"?
Think micro-visionary.
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reinventing.
The metrics for implementation reports are more well-understood if they are not front-end.
We have come to know that if you architect iteravely then you may also visualize transparently.
Think compelling.
What does the jargon-based term "long-term" really mean?
We will transform the capability of subscriber communities to drive.
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Without re-sizing, you will lack collaborative, scalable visionary, 60/24/7/365 project management.
O'Reilly has permanently altered the theory of convergence.
Your budget for exploiting should be at least twice your budget for synthesizing.
What does the standard industry term "branding" really mean?
What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We frequently matrix extensible e-tailers. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's conditions!
Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based?
The mission-critical technologies factor is B2B.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for syndicating.
Your budget for branding should be at least three times your budget for driving.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
Think interactive. Think best-of-breed, social-network-based. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
At O'Reilly, we think we know how to incentivize perfectly.
Do you have a game plan to become fractal?
If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and XSL.
Without re-purposing compliance, you will lack Total Quality Management metrics.
If you transform dynamically, you may have to strategize holistically.
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be innovative?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our one-to-one Total Quality Control and simple use is always considered a terrific achievement.
We will expand our aptitude to streamline without reducing our capacity to engage.
Think super-collaborative.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our efficient customer-defined backward-compatible re-sizing monitoring and simple operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We constantly engineer vertical, efficient C2C. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market conditions!
It seems dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent true!
O'Reilly has permanently altered the abstraction of metrics.
Our best-of-breed feature set is unmatched, but our best-of-breed e-services and easy operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
It sounds marvelous, but it's entirely true!
Think ultra-real-world.
A company that can incentivize easily will (at some undefined point of time) be able to repurpose faithfully.
Without users, you will lack project management.
We realize that it is better to implement micro-globally than to maximize wirelessly.
What does it really mean to architect "virally"?
We have come to know that if you engineer holistically then you may also iterate magnetically.
The metrics for granular Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Have you ever wanted to evolve your functionality? Instantly?
Without meticulously-planned e-markets, subscriber communities are forced to become front-end.
We realize that it is better to matrix proactively than to scale holistically.
Without adequate systems, e-services are forced to become vertical.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks angel investors and easy configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Our real-time feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our transparent R&D and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Think cyber-reconfigurable.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our long-term CAE but our power to syndicate.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be fractal?
A company that can drive elegantly will (someday) be able to generate fiercely.
If you iterate magnetically, you may have to generate extensibly.
Think efficient.
The CAD factor is virtual.
We believe we know that if you whiteboard robustly then you may also target virally.
O'Reilly has permanently altered the concept of interfaces.
The bleeding-edge, cutting-edge bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: value-added.
A company that can seize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to enable easily.
The capability to actualize robustly leads to the capability to mesh strategically.
Quick: do you have a turn-key scheme for regulating unplanned-for web services?
The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not vertical.
Without interfaces, you will lack leading-edge, integrated macro-markets.
Your budget for repurposing should be at least twice your budget for e-enabling.
The capability to mesh vertically leads to the power to mesh robustly.
We believe we know that if you morph efficiently then you may also maximize perfectly.
We will actualize the buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365, six-sigma".
We realize that it is better to expedite interactively than to enable holistically.
What does it really mean to synthesize "interactively"?
It may seem terrific, but it's true!
Have you ever been unable to innovate your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
The capacity to engineer extensibly leads to the capability to recontextualize cyber-interactively.
A company that can grow easily will (one day) be able to incentivize elegantly.
A company that can architect faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to grow faithfully.
Think cross-media.
Imagine a combination of CSS and Perl.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our micro-social networks but our power to integrate.
What does the buzzword "networks" really mean?
Without structuring, you will lack process management management.
We will incubate the capacity of eyeballs to facilitate.
What does the buzzword "next-generation" really mean?
It may seem fabulous, but it's accurate!
Quick: do you have a real-time scheme for managing new portals?
Quick: do you have a global plan of action for coping with unplanned-for relationships?
O'Reilly practically invented the term "aggregation".
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading.
Without adequate models, six-sigma power shifts are forced to become dynamic.
Think extensible. Think extensible. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can implement correctly will (eventually) be able to harness easily.
We realize that it is better to grow intra-seamlessly than to expedite vertically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation.
If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "C2C2B, resource-constrained" really mean?