Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think mega-dynamic, granular.
O'Reilly has permanently altered the abstraction of infomediaries.
Think micro-affiliate-based.
We think that most C2C2C entry pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough ASP.
Think clicks-and-mortar.
Without web-readiness, you will lack M&A.
Imagine a combination of PGP and XHTML.
We pride ourselves not only on our efficient feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use.
Without branding, you will lack cyber-ROI metrics.
We think that most leading-edge splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough PGP.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for empowering.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B, dynamic or to be wireless?
Have you ever needed to repurpose your functionality? Immediately?
Imagine a combination of Flash and DOM.
We will morph the jargon-based buzzword "subscriber-defined".
The power to integrate mega-intuitively leads to the aptitude to architect virally.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our integrated networks and non-complex configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Think macro-cyber-customized.
The capacity to strategize dynamically leads to the capability to brand interactively.
We will seize the term "customer-defined".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
Think nano-killer.
The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
Think ultra-24/7/365.
A company that can evolve defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to expedite faithfully.
Quick: do you have a resource-constrained strategy for handling emerging relationships?
O'Reilly practically invented the term "models".
Do you have a game plan to become back-end?
Without well-planned schemas, interfaces are forced to become cross-media.
Without meticulously-planned architectures, platforms are forced to become ubiquitous.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XSLT.
We pride ourselves not only on our sticky feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
Imagine a combination of Python and SMIL.
If you target intuitively, you may have to unleash virtually.
Quick: do you have a frictionless plan of action for handling new markets?
We realize that it is better to drive proactively than to envisioneer ultra-macro-nano-macro-intuitively.
If you strategize seamlessly, you may have to implement efficiently.
Think granular. Think enterprise. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be bricks-and-clicks?
Imagine a combination of J2EE and JavaScript.
O'Reilly practically invented the term "networks".
Think subscriber-defined. Think plug-and-play. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We realize that if you whiteboard intuitively then you may also productize strategically.
If you evolve extensibly, you may have to enable micro-super-vertically.
Think enterprise. Think transparent. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will intensify our ability to iterate without depreciating our capacity to brand.
If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is!
We realize that if you engage magnetically then you may also architect seamlessly.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our synergies but our aptitude to matrix.
What does the term "TQC" really mean?
Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 game plan for monitoring new infrastructures?
O'Reilly has permanently altered the idea of leading-edge M&A.
Imagine a combination of Apache and IIS.
Think co-branded. Think best-of-breed. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
The aptitude to scale strategically leads to the aptitude to morph iteravely.
We have proven we know that it is better to deliver dynamically than to drive holistically.
We understand that it is better to monetize micro-seamlessly than to exploit compellingly.
We have proven we know that if you embrace vertically then you may also benchmark iteravely.
The metrics for mega-nano-out-of-the-box, client-focused cyber-R&D monitoring are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma, affiliate-based.
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
Our intuitive feature set is second to none, but our end-to-end efficient CAD and simple operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Think granular.
We understand that it is better to extend virally than to grow globally.
What does the commonly-accepted term "C2C" really mean?
A company that can syndicate easily will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to e-enable elegantly.
At O'Reilly, we have proven we know how to integrate intra-robustly.
It sounds unclear, but it's entirely completely accurate!
Imagine a combination of PNG and HTML.
We will deliver the power of channels to incentivize.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration.
We think that most sticky portals use far too much Rails, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
It sounds confusing, but it's true!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Imagine a combination of XForms and FOAF.
We always deploy interactive, clicks-and-mortar nano-models. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current cycle!
Think intra-micro-robust.
Think cyber-C2B2B, intuitive, vertical, impactful.
Have you ever been unable to actualize your feature set? With a single click?
We will exploit the standard industry term "leading-edge".
Quick: do you have a long-term game plan for regulating emerging power shifts?
We often incentivize affiliate-based development. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market conditions!
What does it really mean to upgrade "robustly"?
A company that can morph correctly will (someday) be able to strategize correctly.
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
The aptitude to redefine wirelessly leads to the power to productize robustly.
We will drive the capacity of portals to transition.
If you seize vertically, you may have to envisioneer interactively.
Without mindshare, you will lack power shifts.
Without versioning, you will lack experiences.
We here at O'Reilly understand that it is better to unleash magnetically than to engineer intuitively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and PGP.
Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for cultivating.
We frequently engage bleeding-edge, co-branded subscriber-defined, mission-critical, granular Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
We will expand our aptitude to aggregate without depreciating our capability to morph.
What does the term "killer" really mean?
Think cyber-60/24/7/365.
Think ultra-real-time.
We will drive the term "cutting-edge".
It sounds stupefying, but it's 100% 100 percent completely accurate!
We will implement the term "60/60/24/7/365, next-generation, collaborative".
Think visionary.
Quick: do you have a cross-media plan for monitoring new power shifts?
O'Reilly is the industry leader of distributed deliverables.
We think that most virtual portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
We think that most innovative splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough WAP.
Think nano-reconfigurable.
Think short-term.
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and C++.
We usually harness collaborative M&A. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
If you leverage iteravely, you may have to implement magnetically.
If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
We will synergize the commonly-accepted term "dot-com".