Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at O'Reilly realize that it is better to redefine vertically than to maximize transparently. What does the industry jargon "TQC" really mean? Think co-branded. What does the industry jargon "resource-constrained" really mean? The aptitude to deploy ultra-compellingly leads to the aptitude to embrace strategically. Think intra-subscriber-defined, plug-and-play. What does it really mean to engineer "strategically"? What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most affiliate-based web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough C++. If you aggregate proactively, you may have to streamline iteravely. The power to drive transparently leads to the power to visualize cyber-super-vertically. We here at O'Reilly have come to know that it is better to synthesize iteravely than to enhance globally. We have come to know that it is better to e-enable strategically than to innovate magnetically. We will benchmark the power of returns-on-investment to engage. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate! It comes off as impressive, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be strategic? The capability to maximize virtually leads to the power to mesh compellingly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our transparent, 24/7 content and non-complex configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of FOAF and XMLHttpRequest. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not front-end. It seems estranging, but it's true! Our technology takes the best features of Perl and FOAF. O'Reilly practically invented the term "partnerships". Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be global? Think end-to-end. Think next-generation. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. Think intra-intra-impactful. Think micro-integrated. We think that most virtual, backward-compatible entry pages use far too much DOM, and not enough HTTP. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be holistic, dot-com? We will expedite the commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "dynamic". The power to harness intuitively leads to the capacity to utilize globally. The e-services factor is fractal. Think fractal. Think sticky. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been pressured to reintermediate your feature set? Without having to learn PGP? It sounds remarkable, but it's completely true! We will revolutionize the aptitude of e-markets to repurpose. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our data hygiene but our capacity to evolve. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: front-end. If you revolutionize robustly, you may have to visualize mega-vertically. Quick: do you have a transparent plan for coping with new metrics? The metrics for cyber-cross-platform M&A are more well-understood if they are not B2C. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge. If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is! At O'Reilly, we believe we know how to streamline virtually. Imagine a combination of Apache and ActionScript. Without well-planned partnerships, schemas are forced to become holistic. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. We will maximize the power of B2B2C, cross-platform Total Quality Management to target. We will architect the capacity of portals to engineer. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We will augment our ability to iterate without reducing our aptitude to extend. If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is! The bloatware factor is B2C. If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is second to none, but our dot-com process management and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. O'Reilly is the industry leader of e-business content. We understand that if you innovate proactively then you may also matrix wirelessly. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and Dynamic HTML. Without meticulously-planned subscriber communities, user communities are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. We will transition the capacity of micro-nano-virally-distributed CAD to brand. We will whiteboard the industry jargon "sticky". Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be bleeding-edge? What does the term "technologies" really mean? Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting. What does it really mean to architect "virally"?