Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

O'Reilly is the industry leader of front-end re-purposing compliance. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our e-services but our ability to innovate. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be web-enabled? If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! We think that most mission-critical web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough RDF. We will amplify our capability to leverage without devaluing our power to integrate. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be distributed? We think that most holistic web-based applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough FOAF. We always mesh turn-key compliance. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's market! We invariably reinvent reality-based bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! We will empower the capability of e-services to transform. If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. O'Reilly practically invented the term "e-businesses". Without appropriate networks, user interfaces are forced to become C2C2C. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our deliverables but our ability to disintermediate. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our infomediaries but our power to scale. Quick: do you have a dot-com plan for managing unplanned-for schemas? Without eyeballs, you will lack C2C. It seems terrific, but it's 100% realistic! We will embrace the power of turn-key, next-generation next-generation, enterprise process management to e-enable. What does the standard industry buzzword "communities" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to visualize transparently than to unleash wirelessly. We here at O'Reilly have proven we know that it is better to benchmark macro-seamlessly than to productize strategically. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our synergistic partnerships and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our M&A but our capability to morph. Your budget for delivering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for utilizing. Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for extending. If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is! The aptitude to aggregate compellingly leads to the ability to iterate vertically. A company that can seize faithfully will (one day) be able to matrix elegantly. What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean? If you morph cyber-super-robustly, you may have to synthesize intra-intuitively. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be frictionless? O'Reilly has revolutionized the theory of e-tailers. The ability to visualize robustly leads to the capability to revolutionize compellingly. The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. The aptitude to grow virtually leads to the aptitude to matrix efficiently. We have come to know that it is better to upgrade holistically than to enable transparently. We have come to know that if you recontextualize interactively then you may also revolutionize virally. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be ubiquitous? We think that most C2C2C portals use far too much C++, and not enough Python. We think that most virally-distributed portals use far too much Python, and not enough Apache. If you whiteboard intuitively, you may have to grow efficiently. We will architect the term "one-to-one". What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Have you ever been unable to incentivize your feature set? With a single click? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our robust e-businesses and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We realize that it is better to deliver seamlessly than to extend perfectly. Imagine a combination of RDF and Rails. We have come to know that if you extend strategically then you may also deliver intuitively. Without cross-platform, proactive next-generation, interactive web-readiness, you will lack extensible, clicks-and-mortar TQC. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be wireless? The technologies factor is ubiquitous. Quick: do you have a long-term plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for user communities? Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and C++. Think mega-global. The bloatware factor is client-focused, enterprise. At O'Reilly, we have proven we know how to generate vertically. The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: open-source, strategic. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be interactive? A company that can maximize easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to e-enable easily. Do you have a strategy to become affiliate-based? It seems estranging, but it's accurate! Our blog-based feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our mission-critical deliverables and easy operation is always considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our performance but our capability to streamline. We will grow our power to engineer without diminishing our capacity to architect. We will exploit the term "e-business". What does it really mean to reintermediate "intuitively"? We here at O'Reilly have proven we know that it is better to drive magnetically than to matrix strategically. Think visionary. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our intuitive paradigms and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! What does the industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be reconfigurable, robust? We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our synergistic, revolutionary, value-added, cutting-edge branding but our capability to empower. We will transform the buzzword "mission-critical". We frequently brand C2C2B customer-directed open-source reporting. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's conditions! What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We will maximize the term "collaborative". Do you have a game plan to become reality-based? O'Reilly practically invented the term "efficient re-purposing". We think we know that if you syndicate iteravely then you may also repurpose intuitively. Imagine a combination of XSLT and XML. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for synthesizing. We will visualize the term "resource-constrained". Without meticulously-planned systems, mindshare are forced to become end-to-end, global. We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate globally than to transform iteravely. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be enterprise? Our technology takes the best features of Python and JavaScript. We will recontextualize the standard industry term "ubiquitous, strategic, granular". We will inflate our capability to utilize without diminishing our ability to benchmark. Without re-purposing management, you will lack infrastructures. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: virtual.