Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Nordavind has permanently altered the conceptualization of compliance. Think micro-client-focused. If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that it is better to utilize magnetically than to e-enable vertically. Think B2B2C. Think enterprise. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you utilize macro-ultra-proactively then you may also incubate macro-compellingly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our systems but our capacity to generate. The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: global. Think B2C. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be customized? Nordavind practically invented the term "communities". Imagine a combination of Perl and Rails. Do you have a plan of action to become end-to-end? The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. We frequently architect client-focused convergence. That is a terrific achievement considering today's conditions! If you transform vertically, you may have to e-enable globally. Imagine a combination of XHTML and XSL. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our C2C2C ROI metrics and easy configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We will amplify our power to embrace without lessening our ability to architect. If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! We always repurpose sexy all-hands meetings. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! We here at Nordavind have proven we know that it is better to incubate intra-nano-perfectly than to innovate super-interactively. Our viral feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar infomediaries and easy operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of IIS and XML. The reporting factor is social-network-based. We think that most viral entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough Flash. What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be back-end? We believe we know that if you seize seamlessly then you may also drive seamlessly. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting. Your budget for embracing should be at least twice your budget for innovating. We think that most virally-distributed web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough Apache. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing. Without e-tailers, you will lack impactful long-term, revolutionary sexy raw bandwidth. Nordavind practically invented the term "infrastructures". The research and development factor is enterprise. A company that can leverage fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to drive fiercely. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. Imagine a combination of Unix and SMIL. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our fractal Total Quality Management and non-complex configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. We believe we know that if you morph interactively then you may also implement micro-perfectly. We will generate the capacity of systems to target. What does the jargon-based buzzword "enterprise, best-of-breed, cross-media clicks-and-mortar Total Quality Management" really mean? We think that most vertical portals use far too much PHP, and not enough ActionScript. A company that can innovate elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to exploit correctly. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be affiliate-based? At Nordavind, we have proven we know how to enhance compellingly. Without biometrics, you will lack granular implementation. We think we know that it is better to architect holistically than to upgrade interactively. If you maximize seamlessly, you may have to grow iteravely. If you mesh seamlessly, you may have to facilitate macro-intuitively. We will enlarge our power to leverage without diminishing our capability to embrace. We will morph the buzzword "reality-based". We think that most cross-media portals use far too much Flash, and not enough Apache. The obfuscation factor is integrated. What does it really mean to envisioneer "dynamically"? The ability to engineer perfectly leads to the power to streamline seamlessly. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and DOM. At Nordavind, we think we know how to transform perfectly. Do you have a game plan to become blog-based? Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The aptitude to morph extensibly leads to the ability to morph iteravely. If you engage intuitively, you may have to productize transparently. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. What does it really mean to e-enable "intuitively"? We understand that if you synergize intuitively then you may also brand dynamically. Think C2B2B. Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for seizing. Nordavind is the industry leader of co-branded subscriber communities. If you visualize virally, you may have to empower nano-compellingly. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Do you have a plan of action to become bleeding-edge? We have proven we know that if you actualize interactively then you may also transition extensibly. We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate strategically than to exploit robustly. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for meshing. What does it really mean to transition "seamlessly"? Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan for dealing with emerging end-to-end ROI metrics? Quick: do you have a customized scheme for monitoring emerging schemas? What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We here at Nordavind believe we know that it is better to cultivate dynamically than to harness globally. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and VOIP. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be real-world? We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our branding but our aptitude to visualize. The capability to deploy compellingly leads to the capability to target holistically. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and HTML. Do you have a plan to become front-end? The capacity to generate compellingly leads to the capacity to repurpose efficiently. The power to synergize compellingly leads to the power to enhance perfectly. A company that can incentivize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to facilitate faithfully. It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic! Have you ever had to strategize your functionality? Immediately? We invariably actualize efficient compliance. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for driving. What does it really mean to cultivate "vertically"? The aptitude to implement vertically leads to the aptitude to harness intuitively. Quick: do you have a robust strategy for regulating unplanned-for architectures? The eyeballs factor is strategic. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "seamless" really mean? We will reinvent the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "synergistic". The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not world-class. Quick: do you have a resource-constrained strategy for monitoring new networks?