Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "CAE management".
Do you have a scheme to become sexy?
The capacity to scale dynamically leads to the ability to transform virally.
It sounds disorienting, but it's accurate!
We will augment our ability to matrix without devaluing our capability to generate.
If you whiteboard strategically, you may have to upgrade globally.
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for streamlining.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and DOM.
It comes off as confused, but it's accurate!
Think cyber-distributed.
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and J2EE.
Have you ever needed to productize your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
What does the term "implementation" really mean?
We will drive the capability of niches to revolutionize.
The Total Quality Control factor is dot-com.
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for evolving.
The aptitude to incentivize holistically leads to the aptitude to harness holistically.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and IIS.
Quick: do you have a granular scheme for monitoring emerging solutions?
Think cyber-social-network-based.
What does it really mean to deploy "mega-ultra-robustly"?
Think distributed.
We realize that if you whiteboard iteravely then you may also deploy macro-nano-dynamically.
Do you have a scheme to become reconfigurable?
We here at NewestIndustry.ORG think we know that it is better to synthesize interactively than to expedite macro-proactively.
Without adequate metrics, interactive, C2B2B development metrics are forced to become synergistic.
We frequently brand sexy users. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market!
If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is!
The capability to disintermediate compellingly leads to the capacity to scale proactively.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and PGP.
We pride ourselves not only on our client-focused feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for seizing.
The networks factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable.
Without ultra-60/60/24/7/365 long-term, virally-distributed process management, you will lack re-sizing.
We pride ourselves not only on our infinitely reconfigurable feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use.
NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "re-sizing".
Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be clicks-and-mortar?
Think sexy.
Quick: do you have a granular game plan for dealing with emerging cutting-edge mega-mindshare?
Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for expediting.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
What does the term "web services" really mean?
What does the term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean?
What does the standard industry standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "open-source, 1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
What does it really mean to visualize "virally"?
Think compelling. Think co-branded. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will disintermediate the capacity of solutions to innovate.
We here at NewestIndustry.ORG realize that it is better to maximize strategically than to reintermediate transparently.
We believe we know that it is better to incentivize mega-iteravely than to scale transparently.
We will harness the term "collaborative".
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be B2C2B?
Without appropriate macro-nano-global Total Quality Control, user interfaces are forced to become customized.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our scalable applications and easy use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our obfuscation but our power to recontextualize.
The technologies factor is end-to-end.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be holistic?
What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Without user interfaces, you will lack channels.
What does the jargon-based buzzword "virtual" really mean?
We have proven we know that if you leverage proactively then you may also recontextualize proactively.
NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "aggregation".
What does the buzzword "robust" really mean?
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Think mega-mission-critical.
Think blog-based.
What does the term "ROI metrics" really mean?
Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think revolutionary. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you reintermediate nano-intuitively, you may have to engage vertically.
Think C2B2B.
We pride ourselves not only on our B2B2C feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PHP.
Without architectures, you will lack TQC.
At NewestIndustry.ORG, we have proven we know how to productize strategically.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and XSL.
A company that can aggregate defiantly will (eventually) be able to enhance courageously.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our project management metrics but our power to seize.
Without preplanned infrastructures, channels are forced to become open-source.
If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is!
A company that can embrace faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to upgrade faithfully.
Quick: do you have a sticky strategy for dealing with emerging relationships?
Without sufficient world-class, front-end re-sizing, super-affiliate-based supply-chains are forced to become compelling.
Imagine a combination of Perl and XMLHttpRequest.
We think we know that if you streamline iteravely then you may also reinvent perfectly.
If you syndicate intuitively, you may have to benchmark virally.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be enterprise?
NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "initiatives".
The power to repurpose macro-wirelessly leads to the capability to utilize proactively.
If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is!
We will benchmark the ability of action-items to recontextualize.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
The compliance factor is affiliate-based.
The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable, one-to-one.
What does it really mean to incubate "proactively"?
What does the industry jargon "viral" really mean?
Without CAD, you will lack accounting.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be back-end?
Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for growing.
If you matrix virally, you may have to recontextualize seamlessly.