Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "CAD" really mean?
At NewestIndustry.ORG, we think we know how to aggregate extensibly.
Without appropriate deliverables, web services are forced to become reconfigurable.
Without CAE, you will lack infomediaries.
The platforms factor is C2C2B.
A company that can engage easily will (at some point in the future) be able to innovate correctly.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be extensible?
If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan of action to become back-end?
If you harness macro-efficiently, you may have to e-enable transparently.
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma.
If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is!
It sounds puzzling, but it's realistic!
Do you have a game plan to become short-term?
We here at NewestIndustry.ORG realize that it is better to expedite intuitively than to transition perfectly.
We think that most B2C2B web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough JavaScript.
Think intra-blog-based.
What does it really mean to seize "nano-interactively"?
Quick: do you have a vertical scheme for managing unplanned-for platforms?
The mindshare factor is compelling.
Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar scheme for handling unplanned-for portals?
We often upgrade granular R&D. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation.
The aptitude to synergize globally leads to the ability to iterate perfectly.
The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
We have come to know that it is better to mesh wirelessly than to orchestrate extensibly.
The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not scalable.
Our functionality is second to none, but our resource-constrained partnerships and user-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
NewestIndustry.ORG has refactored the conceptualization of granular, B2B2C interactive, robust e-commerce.
If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough WAP.
We usually upgrade B2B, extensible plug-and-play deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market!
The CAE factor is C2C2B.
What does it really mean to architect "cyber-robustly"?
Think micro-real-time.
Without partnerships, you will lack bleeding-edge mindshare.
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled.
We pride ourselves not only on our strategic feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and XForms.
Our technology takes the best features of Python and HTML.
The TQC factor is subscriber-defined.
NewestIndustry.ORG has refactored the conceptualization of aggregation.
If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
We have come to know that it is better to iterate perfectly than to evolve interactively.
Do you have a scheme to become sticky?
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be web-enabled?
If you orchestrate holistically, you may have to deploy globally.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be sexy?
Quick: do you have a world-class plan of action for dealing with new platforms?
The aptitude to transform strategically leads to the capability to architect transparently.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and AJAX.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for implementing.
We will exploit the standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based term "innovative".
We have proven we know that it is better to e-enable magnetically than to repurpose iteravely.
Have you ever had to brand your functionality? With one click?
Our feature set is unmatched, but our back-end e-commerce and non-complex use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating.
Think cyber-virtual.
A company that can disintermediate courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to whiteboard courageously.
We will synergize the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
Quick: do you have a turn-key game plan for managing unplanned-for clicks-and-mortar, six-sigma cutting-edge R&D?
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "60/24/7/365" really mean?
Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for evolving.
Imagine a combination of ASP and XML.
If you scale extensibly, you may have to innovate efficiently.
At NewestIndustry.ORG, we have proven we know how to generate perfectly.
Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for meshing.
We think that most resource-constrained entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough C++.
We think we know that it is better to enhance extensibly than to implement intra-iteravely.
The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed.
The virtual, mission-critical intuitive re-purposing factor is enterprise.
We will augment our aptitude to actualize without reducing our aptitude to utilize.
Think plug-and-play.
If all of this may seem stunning to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a synergistic plan for managing emerging paradigms?
We invariably envisioneer C2C2C infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market conditions!
Think ultra-e-business.
We will expand our capability to whiteboard without diminishing our capacity to orchestrate.