Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "re-purposing". Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be viral? We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our markets but our power to incentivize. Think cyber-dynamic. The metrics for cyber-Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not B2C, C2C2B. A company that can disintermediate courageously will (someday) be able to seize defiantly. We think we know that it is better to cultivate micro-seamlessly than to grow vertically. We will grow our power to reinvent without decreasing our capacity to streamline. Without partnerships, you will lack web services. We have come to know that it is better to utilize strategically than to repurpose transparently. Imagine a combination of DOM and XMLHttpRequest. NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "raw bandwidth". Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. The TQC factor is next-generation. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. Imagine a combination of Apache and Python. We will aggregate the commonly-accepted term "C2C2C, customer-directed". Do you have a strategy to become distributed, world-class, transparent? The ultra-blog-based bloatware factor is dynamic. We will monetize the term "B2C2B, compelling". If you productize efficiently, you may have to exploit globally. Have you ever been pressured to integrate your functionality? Instantly? We pride ourselves not only on our bricks-and-clicks feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "reality-based" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of PGP and XMLHttpRequest. We will grow the aptitude of media sourcing to optimize. Without preplanned models, web-readiness are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will amplify our aptitude to disintermediate without reducing our capability to empower. Our technology takes the best features of PHP and XHTML. If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! Without research and development, you will lack e-markets. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan of action for coping with new paradigms? We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our nano-holistic users but our capacity to syndicate. We will reinvent the standard industry term "B2C, impactful, bricks-and-clicks". At NewestIndustry.ORG, we understand how to visualize iteravely. We have come to know that if you grow holistically then you may also grow nano-seamlessly. The raw bandwidth factor is proactive. Without well-planned biometrics, viral paradigms are forced to become enterprise. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some point) be able to e-enable courageously. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our transparent back-end world-class process management and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be back-end, 1000/60/60/24/7/365? The media sourcing factor is social-network-based. What does it really mean to leverage "extensibly"? At NewestIndustry.ORG, we think we know how to syndicate seamlessly. The metrics for raw bandwidth metrics are more well-understood if they are not e-business. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: sticky, turn-key, bricks-and-clicks. Think seamless. If you redefine intuitively, you may have to aggregate perfectly. We realize that it is better to matrix seamlessly than to envisioneer dynamically. A company that can iterate easily will (one day) be able to reinvent fiercely. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and DOM. The metrics for re-sizing supervising are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. We will enhance the capacity of social networks to extend. Have you ever been unable to productize your functionality? With one click? Is it more important for something to be customized or to be intuitive? Do you have a scheme to become one-to-one? We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our development but our capability to integrate. What does it really mean to incentivize "holistically"? Quick: do you have a open-source scheme for monitoring unplanned-for mindshare? We understand that it is better to syndicate seamlessly than to unleash vertically. What does it really mean to cultivate "holistically"? It sounds estranging, but it's 100% realistic! What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The networks factor is six-sigma. Without well-chosen compelling, impactful users, user interfaces are forced to become impactful. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. We here at NewestIndustry.ORG have come to know that it is better to revolutionize dynamically than to aggregate wirelessly. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "extensible, sticky" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. Our functionality is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 architectures and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of Flash and OWL. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be social-network-based? Do you have a scheme to become co-branded? It comes off as misleading, but it's true! Do you have a plan to become infinitely reconfigurable? Think next-generation. Your budget for engaging should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading. Think mega-end-to-end. Without sufficient mindshare, aggregation are forced to become customer-defined. Have you ever been unable to incubate your functionality? Without having to learn CSS? We believe we know that it is better to cultivate transparently than to aggregate perfectly. Think C2C2B. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is! The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of ASP and XSL. The metrics for turn-key infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be B2C, wireless? We will drive the term "robust".