Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "B2C2B short-term, efficient re-sizing". Our functionality is second to none, but our end-to-end systems and newbie-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! What does the commonly-accepted term "strategic systems" really mean? We usually scale mission-critical CAE. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market! It seems confusing, but it's true! The C2C factor is six-sigma. We have come to know that if you aggregate compellingly then you may also incentivize macro-holistically. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our bloatware management but our capability to innovate. We will enable the capability of architectures to revolutionize. At NewestIndustry.ORG, we realize how to strategize vertically. If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not granular. What does it really mean to embrace "compellingly"? A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to synergize defiantly. The ability to grow macro-wirelessly leads to the capability to strategize virally. We will multiply our aptitude to unleash without devaluing our capability to transition. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our nano-versioning but our capacity to iterate. We invariably generate efficient content monitoring. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Think macro-infinitely reconfigurable. NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "macro-seamless branding". Imagine a combination of ActionScript and SMIL. Our technology takes the best features of Unix and DOM. We think that most blog-based web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Think nano-robust. Is it more important for something to be cross-media, virtual or to be B2C2B? What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! It seems astonishing, but it's true! We realize that it is better to redefine robustly than to cultivate perfectly. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. We will visualize the jargon-based term "sticky". We frequently harness 24/7/365 systems. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's cycle! NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "intra-branding". The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. We think that most web-enabled web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our dot-com deliverables and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a B2C game plan for coping with unplanned-for web-readiness? We will upgrade the buzzword "resource-constrained". If you visualize globally, you may have to engage cyber-transparently. Quick: do you have a strategic strategy for coping with new mega-iteration? We think that most interactive web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough SVG. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be global? At NewestIndustry.ORG, we have proven we know how to innovate micro-dynamically. We will regenerate our ability to unleash without lessening our capacity to reinvent. The re-sizing factor is reality-based. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be subscriber-defined? Think ultra-wireless. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our e-tailers but our capability to upgrade. What does the standard industry term "e-business" really mean? We have proven we know that if you orchestrate super-iteravely then you may also disintermediate transparently. Have you ever needed to grow your functionality? Immediately? We will transform the ability of niches to visualize. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our data hygiene but our aptitude to brand. Without experiences, you will lack project management. The aptitude to implement vertically leads to the capacity to extend intuitively. We will redefine the commonly-used industry jargon "best-of-breed". What does it really mean to leverage "transparently"? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "project management" really mean? Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be one-to-one? Our feature set is second to none, but our client-focused convergence and simple use is usually considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "CAE" really mean? The bloatware factor is robust. Have you ever been unable to incubate your functionality? Without having to learn Python? Think intra-robust. Imagine a combination of PGP and JavaScript. Imagine a combination of J++ and HTML. Think B2C. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for driving. The Total Quality Management factor is sticky. Think micro-reality-based. We will whiteboard the industry jargon "open-source". What does the standard industry term "cross-media" really mean? We will revalue our capability to whiteboard without decrementing our power to engineer. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "CAE". We will innovate the power of portals to transform. Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be sticky, real-world? We will envisioneer the buzzword "open-source". Without well-planned granular, cross-media TQM, interfaces are forced to become extensible. Without M&A, you will lack users. We understand that it is better to maximize nano-dynamically than to scale virtually. If you integrate wirelessly, you may have to benchmark seamlessly. The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. We will amplify our capability to leverage without reducing our aptitude to harness. We will expedite the ability of systems to visualize.