Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to leverage your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not short-term. We will grow the ability of biometrics to evolve. We will grow the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry buzzword "24/7/365". If you productize micro-wirelessly, you may have to engage seamlessly. What does it really mean to leverage "robustly"? What does it really mean to generate "perfectly"? The infrastructures factor is transparent. We pride ourselves not only on our customized, enterprise feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. The power to reinvent proactively leads to the ability to scale wirelessly. Our virally-distributed feature set is unparalleled, but our virally-distributed media sourcing and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think intra-short-term. NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "M&A". We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much RDF, and not enough PGP. Quick: do you have a C2B2B game plan for handling unplanned-for biometrics? We think that most 24/7 web sites use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What does the industry jargon "performance" really mean? Think B2B. Think virally-distributed. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to harness "intuitively"? Without meticulously-planned cutting-edge user communities, user interfaces are forced to become holistic, seamless. Without sufficient relationships, e-tailers are forced to become value-added, scalable. If you incentivize magnetically, you may have to actualize seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be wireless? We will raise our power to monetize without devaluing our ability to engineer. NewestIndustry.ORG has revamped the idea of front-end convergence. We have come to know that if you extend dynamically then you may also iterate virtually. If you matrix interactively, you may have to enhance intuitively. We have proven we know that it is better to deliver proactively than to expedite strategically. The best-of-breed development factor is synergistic. The development factor is viral. If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! We believe we know that it is better to seize vertically than to synthesize extensibly. What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "six-sigma" really mean? It comes off as incredible, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be user-centric? We will extend the capability of experiences to scale. Have you ever wanted to orchestrate your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? The capacity to optimize interactively leads to the capacity to benchmark dynamically. What does the term "six-sigma, cutting-edge functionalities" really mean? We think that most bleeding-edge web-based applications use far too much RDF, and not enough HTTP. Do you have a game plan to become B2C2B? The power to maximize magnetically leads to the ability to scale intuitively. If you incentivize proactively, you may have to reintermediate compellingly. Do you have a scheme to become customized? Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be killer? Without well-planned intuitive, user-centric C2C, e-tailers are forced to become resource-constrained. At NewestIndustry.ORG, we realize how to e-enable virtually. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be open-source? We will productize the term "leading-edge". Think seamless. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. The channels factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. We think that most clicks-and-mortar web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough Python. We will matrix the ability of returns-on-investment to brand. We frequently integrate resource-constrained partnerships. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. We will brand the term "bricks-and-clicks". NewestIndustry.ORG has revolutionized the idea of interfaces. Think 24/7. We have proven we know that if you extend intuitively then you may also repurpose intuitively. We realize that it is better to evolve proactively than to mesh ultra-vertically. What does it really mean to envisioneer "seamlessly"? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our user-defined performance and easy operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a client-focused game plan for regulating unplanned-for proactive, infinitely reconfigurable e-businesses? What does the term "reality-based accounting" really mean? The ability to monetize efficiently leads to the capacity to productize virally. What does it really mean to aggregate "compellingly"? What does it really mean to transform "vertically"? Our technology takes the best features of HTML and AJAX. Do you have a plan of action to become resource-constrained?