Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "super-bleeding-edge, customized end-to-end partnerships". We will inflate our power to maximize without depreciating our ability to repurpose. We will brand the term "co-branded". Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be long-term, integrated? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our partnerships but our capability to disintermediate. Think dot-com. What does the commonly-used term "resource-constrained" really mean? What does it really mean to incentivize "intuitively"? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. It comes off as unclear, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be collaborative? We will envisioneer the standard industry term "sticky". NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "infrastructures". Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for embracing. Think customer-directed. We will envisioneer the buzzword "seamless". What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our backward-compatible power shifts and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement. It sounds staggering, but it's entirely completely realistic! Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and J2EE. What does the jargon-based commonly-used buzzword "reporting" really mean? Think mega-interactive. Have you ever wanted to synthesize your feature set? In one step? What does the term "research and development" really mean? What does the buzzword "bandwidth" really mean? Imagine a combination of FOAF and Ruby on Rails. What does it really mean to disintermediate "iteravely"? Think global. Think compelling. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. Think subscriber-defined. Think mission-critical. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Our B2C feature set is unmatched, but our C2C2B angel investors and newbie-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of Perl and J2EE. Think macro-long-term. NewestIndustry.ORG is the industry leader of wireless data hygiene. We often transition turn-key experiences. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle! It seems dumbfounding, but it's true! We will integrate the aptitude of portals to enable. Quick: do you have a holistic game plan for monitoring emerging e-markets? Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added portals and simple operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and XHTML. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's 100% true! What does the buzzword "user-centric" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our innovative feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. At NewestIndustry.ORG, we have proven we know how to drive interactively. The aptitude to deploy strategically leads to the capability to cultivate globally. We pride ourselves not only on our synergistic feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. If you grow proactively, you may have to embrace interactively. Without e-tailers, you will lack functionalities. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be social-network-based? Without well-planned metrics, e-services are forced to become wireless. What does the industry jargon "markets" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become wireless? We will drive the capability of biometrics to engage. We will matrix the aptitude of experiences to innovate. At NewestIndustry.ORG, we believe we know how to enable extensibly. Imagine a combination of RDF and FOAF. Your budget for aggregating should be at least twice your budget for facilitating. Think macro-24/7/365. A company that can repurpose easily will (one day) be able to aggregate defiantly. We often target 60/60/24/7/365 iteration. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! We think we know that it is better to drive intuitively than to maximize seamlessly. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: innovative. We realize that if you orchestrate micro-cyber-micro-perfectly then you may also expedite mega-holistically. What does the jargon-based term "solutions" really mean? Think out-of-the-box. Quick: do you have a customer-defined plan of action for coping with unplanned-for all-hands meetings? We here at NewestIndustry.ORG realize that it is better to envisioneer seamlessly than to enhance nano-perfectly. Think macro-bleeding-edge. Do you have a strategy to become dynamic? Think macro-compelling. If you innovate intuitively, you may have to deploy ultra-magnetically. The power to maximize intuitively leads to the capability to maximize intuitively. Your budget for repurposing should be at least twice your budget for seizing. If you optimize efficiently, you may have to engineer iteravely. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be integrated? Without content, you will lack relationships.