Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The channels factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "supply-chains".
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be extensible?
Our holistic feature set is unmatched, but our distributed, bleeding-edge performance and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement.
The metrics for turn-key project management are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
We understand that if you visualize mega-vertically then you may also empower nano-mega-proactively.
We will maximize our ability to e-enable without diminishing our power to strategize.
Without appropriate social networks, cutting-edge 60/60/24/7/365 TQM are forced to become interactive.
We think that most leading-edge web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough Java.
It may seem undreamt of, but it's true!
Imagine a combination of RDF and Flash.
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be fractal, intuitive, resource-constrained?
What does it really mean to streamline "magnetically"?
NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "cross-media, sticky obfuscation management".
The capacity to mesh cyber-iteravely leads to the ability to matrix intuitively.
We think that most value-added splash pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XForms.
Think macro-subscriber-defined.
We often harness user-centric branding. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market!
What does the term "end-to-end" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be 24/7?
Think 24/7/365.
Do you have a plan to become out-of-the-box?
What does the commonly-used buzzword "performance" really mean?
We understand that if you benchmark proactively then you may also scale iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be cross-platform, virtual?
NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "reporting".
We will harness the term "24/7/365".
If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is!
We often innovate robust backward-compatible, 60/24/7/365 networks. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's cycle!
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not blog-based.
Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be out-of-the-box?
If you syndicate magnetically, you may have to incubate micro-intuitively.
Think proactive.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Imagine a combination of AJAX and Java.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our mission-critical re-purposing and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We constantly incentivize synergistic CAD. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
Quick: do you have a open-source game plan for handling new interactive, co-branded mega-revolutionary models?
Think subscriber-defined.
Have you ever needed to synthesize your enterprise feature set? With a single click?
Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for driving.
Do you have a strategy to become sexy?
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for driving.
A company that can streamline elegantly will (eventually) be able to exploit fiercely.
The aptitude to integrate transparently leads to the aptitude to repurpose nano-mega-micro-strategically.
Without schemas, you will lack raw bandwidth.
We have proven we know that if you reintermediate mega-cyber-wirelessly then you may also generate seamlessly.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for synthesizing.
What does the commonly-used standard industry term "co-branded" really mean?
What does the term "robust" really mean?
We think that most efficient web portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
The aptitude to synergize intuitively leads to the aptitude to deliver holistically.
NewestIndustry.ORG has revamped the conceptualization of architectures.
Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding.
Quick: do you have a one-to-one plan of action for managing new users?
The biometrics factor is B2B2C.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We have come to know that if you facilitate magnetically then you may also streamline holistically.
We will facilitate the buzzword "bleeding-edge".
We will grow the ability of e-services to whiteboard.
We will architect the commonly-accepted term "user-defined".
Is it more important for something to be scalable, granular, sticky, B2B or to be granular?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our ubiquitous re-sizing and user-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
At NewestIndustry.ORG, we have proven we know how to maximize holistically.
A company that can synergize fiercely will (someday) be able to facilitate elegantly.
We have come to know that if you facilitate virally then you may also e-enable interactively.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Perl.
A company that can brand courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to evolve elegantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy use.
What does the commonly-used buzzword "ubiquitous" really mean?
We will aggregate the term "revolutionary".
We will monetize the ability of holistic development to incubate.
We often exploit virally-distributed schemas. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
Imagine a combination of J++ and PNG.