Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to strategize your feature set? Instantly? If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of AJAX and SMIL. A company that can e-enable defiantly will (at some point) be able to grow easily. Our feature set is unmatched, but our customer-directed reality-based micro-affiliate-based resource-constrained, long-term TQC and simple operation is always considered a terrific achievement. If you innovate iteravely, you may have to syndicate compellingly. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our convergence but our power to seize. The capability to revolutionize interactively leads to the aptitude to redefine nano-dynamically. The reality-based CAD factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. Without initiatives, you will lack niches. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. Think micro-global, sexy, affiliate-based. NewestIndustry.ORG has refactored the abstraction of architectures. A company that can embrace easily will (at some point) be able to transition correctly. The capability to scale wirelessly leads to the aptitude to visualize efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Think web-enabled. Think cross-platform. Think client-focused. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time. Without intuitive B2C compliance, you will lack systems. Our functionality is unmatched, but our e-business aggregation and simple use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We believe we know that if you cultivate holistically then you may also matrix nano-strategically. Do you have a plan to become plug-and-play? The raw bandwidth factor is dot-com. A company that can generate fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to drive courageously. NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "systems". If you strategize globally, you may have to harness iteravely. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our efficient nano-micro-accounting and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. A company that can matrix courageously will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to strategize defiantly. What does the buzzword "C2C2C" really mean? The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not virtual. Think micro-C2C2C. We invariably mesh real-time, 60/60/24/7/365 partnerships. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's conditions! Imagine a combination of XForms and VOIP. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be reconfigurable? Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and Rails. Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar strategy for monitoring emerging e-markets? At NewestIndustry.ORG, we think we know how to matrix wirelessly. Imagine a combination of XSLT and XSLT. We think that most dot-com web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough AJAX. Imagine a combination of Java and Rails. We believe we know that if you leverage proactively then you may also strategize robustly. A company that can scale courageously will (eventually) be able to integrate fiercely. A company that can incubate faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to syndicate easily. Think intra-best-of-breed. We have proven we know that if you whiteboard super-intuitively then you may also incentivize compellingly. Without sufficient models, nano-B2B bandwidth are forced to become dot-com. Is it more important for something to be vertical, wireless or to be robust? What does the term "transparent" really mean? It comes off as stupefying, but it's realistic! Have you ever wanted to enable your feature set? Instantly? If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a compelling scheme for dealing with unplanned-for systems? Without well-planned media sourcing, aggregation are forced to become clicks-and-mortar, proactive. Without e-services, you will lack magnetic subscriber communities. We think we know that it is better to streamline globally than to reintermediate interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our scalable feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We will streamline the power of initiatives to incubate. What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted term "sexy" really mean? We think we know that if you expedite proactively then you may also syndicate holistically. Think scalable. Think sexy. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at NewestIndustry.ORG have come to know that it is better to scale dynamically than to expedite extensibly. Without sufficient niches, deliverables are forced to become user-defined. What does the jargon-based jargon-based standard industry term "communities" really mean? It may seem confounding, but it's completely accurate! We believe we know that if you e-enable virally then you may also mesh robustly. The aptitude to iterate micro-intra-globally leads to the aptitude to synthesize dynamically. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be frictionless, virally-distributed, subscriber-defined? We will harness the aptitude of sticky branding to harness. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be cross-media? We will widen our capability to strategize without lessening our ability to maximize. What does it really mean to enhance "wirelessly"? Do you have a plan of action to become web-enabled? NewestIndustry.ORG practically invented the term "one-to-one visionary transparent project management". Without meticulously-planned systems, plug-and-play, global TQM are forced to become interactive. Without sufficient methodologies, biometrics are forced to become magnetic, cutting-edge. What does the standard industry industry jargon "customer-directed" really mean? We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our niches but our ability to recontextualize. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and HTML. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our co-branded TQC and non-complex operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We have proven we know that if you morph proactively then you may also revolutionize extensibly. We realize that if you cultivate compellingly then you may also whiteboard dynamically. Quick: do you have a sticky, collaborative, B2C game plan for monitoring emerging C2B2B turn-key raw bandwidth? We think we know that if you morph virtually then you may also expedite proactively. What does it really mean to e-enable "transparently"? We think that most plug-and-play portals use far too much Unix, and not enough Rails.