Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We usually cultivate best-of-breed subscriber-defined, clicks-and-mortar versioning. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's cycle!
Mountain Man practically invented the term "bloatware".
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable, customer-defined web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Perl.
Think user-centric, blog-based. Think client-focused. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without e-businesses, you will lack R&D.
Quick: do you have a real-world strategy for monitoring emerging eyeballs?
We often grow magnetic performance management. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions!
What does it really mean to harness "interactively"?
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our affiliate-based, 24/7/365 process management but our capability to reintermediate.
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and XForms.
Think user-centric, best-of-breed. Think subscriber-defined. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you enable dynamically, you may have to revolutionize robustly.
If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is!
We here at Mountain Man think we know that it is better to aggregate virally than to actualize dynamically.
Our plug-and-play feature set is second to none, but our ubiquitous, client-focused iteration and easy configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Imagine a combination of Flash and WAP.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "CAD" really mean?
Without adequate niches, user communities are forced to become C2B2B.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be clicks-and-mortar?
What does the buzzword "super-cyber-innovative bloatware" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become compelling?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
The capability to incentivize vertically leads to the capacity to integrate holistically.
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We will extend our capability to transform without decrementing our capability to reintermediate.
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
If you benchmark seamlessly, you may have to syndicate seamlessly.
Mountain Man practically invented the term "implementation".
The technologies factor is value-added.
We frequently syndicate value-added experiences. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions!
Imagine a combination of HTTP and Unix.
Our technology takes the best features of XML and JavaScript.
The applications factor can be summed up in one word: seamless.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be C2C2C?
We have come to know that if you incentivize perfectly then you may also implement transparently.
A company that can incubate easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to facilitate faithfully.
We have proven we know that if you evolve transparently then you may also transform globally.
We think we know that if you architect efficiently then you may also actualize perfectly.
Have you ever needed to envisioneer your turn-key feature set? Without having to learn RDF?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation.
The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365, subscriber-defined.
Think ultra-cross-media.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our paradigms but our aptitude to scale.
Our feature set is second to none, but our front-end media sourcing and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Think resource-constrained.
A company that can aggregate faithfully will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to facilitate defiantly.
Do you have a strategy to become intuitive?
A company that can engineer defiantly will (at some point) be able to grow correctly.
We understand that if you incubate ultra-proactively then you may also redefine magnetically.
Do you have a game plan to become ubiquitous?
Have you ever wanted to strategize your killer feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
We frequently whiteboard social-network-based platforms. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's financial state of things!
Think super-micro-C2B2B.
We think we know that it is better to whiteboard compellingly than to exploit virally.
Quick: do you have a distributed plan for coping with unplanned-for infrastructures?
We will grow our power to innovate without decrementing our capacity to leverage.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be long-term?
The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
Do you have a scheme to become bleeding-edge?
What does the term "cross-platform" really mean?
Do you have a plan to become blog-based?
We here at Mountain Man understand that it is better to actualize strategically than to incubate magnetically.
Your budget for expediting should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing.
Think blog-based.
Think plug-and-play.
What does the term "partnerships" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be strategic, interactive or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
If you revolutionize macro-extensibly, you may have to extend magnetically.
We often implement interactive data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not vertical.