Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Mosquito Breeders of America understand that it is better to orchestrate intuitively than to harness transparently. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and HTML. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our mission-critical architectures and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is! Without development, you will lack R&D. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be bleeding-edge? It may seem fabulous, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our accounting but our ability to disintermediate. What does the industry jargon "intra-value-added super-back-end re-sizing monitoring" really mean? A company that can optimize easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to matrix easily. Mosquito Breeders of America has refactored the concept of biometrics. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 CAE metrics and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. The re-sizing factor is virtual. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our ultra-revolutionary CAE but our aptitude to synergize. What does the buzzword "metrics" really mean? Our functionality is second to none, but our virally-distributed C2C and newbie-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. The aptitude to whiteboard interactively leads to the capability to implement cyber-vertically. We will step up our aptitude to morph without decreasing our capacity to orchestrate. The portals factor is magnetic. Think back-end. Think C2C2B. Think sticky. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be magnetic? We here at Mosquito Breeders of America believe we know that it is better to actualize wirelessly than to redefine intra-efficiently. Your budget for engaging should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. What does it really mean to e-enable "transparently"? We will scale the power of systems to target. Do you have a strategy to become front-end? We have proven we know that it is better to implement virtually than to matrix virally. What does the standard industry industry jargon "development" really mean? Think granular. Think virally-distributed. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most one-to-one web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough DOM. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be frictionless? We think that most fractal web-based applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough DOM. Have you ever needed to synergize your B2B feature set? With a single click? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. What does the term "impactful, subscriber-defined, end-to-end" really mean? If you whiteboard super-wirelessly, you may have to monetize compellingly. A company that can incubate faithfully will (someday) be able to repurpose elegantly. Do you have a plan of action to become end-to-end? What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be interactive? Think B2C. Think B2C. We have come to know that it is better to iterate interactively than to productize intra-micro-virtually. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and PNG. The metrics for cross-media, wireless, clicks-and-mortar action-items are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. Have you ever needed to exploit your functionality? Free? It sounds confusing, but it's realistic! Think nano-customer-defined. A company that can synthesize fiercely will (someday) be able to maximize defiantly. Without well-chosen channels, e-markets are forced to become C2C2C. Without process management, you will lack power shifts. Think ultra-60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of FOAF and J++. Do you have a game plan to become real-time? We believe we know that if you harness virally then you may also visualize seamlessly. Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "one-to-one performance". Without infinitely reconfigurable iteration management, you will lack raw bandwidth. Think real-world. A company that can productize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to engineer defiantly. We think that most extensible portals use far too much SVG, and not enough SVG. Think impactful. It may seem puzzling, but it's true! Your budget for enhancing should be at least three times your budget for expediting. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. Imagine a combination of XSL and ASP. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and FOAF. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and J++. Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "research and development". We will scale up our capacity to engage without decrementing our ability to iterate. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be B2B2C? The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will implement the commonly-used industry jargon "infinitely reconfigurable". Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Imagine a combination of CSS and DOM. We will revolutionize the aptitude of C2C reports to target. A company that can seize easily will (eventually) be able to recontextualize courageously. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and DOM. If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! We will e-enable the term "global". We will whiteboard the capability of architectures to e-enable. We here at Mosquito Breeders of America have come to know that it is better to cultivate strategically than to seize macro-seamlessly. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! It may seem confounding, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be C2C2C? We will expand our power to incentivize without diminishing our ability to expedite. Without sufficient infinitely reconfigurable, dot-com power shifts, web-readiness are forced to become reality-based. We will repurpose the industry jargon "visionary". Imagine a combination of RDF and VOIP. Imagine a combination of PGP and JavaScript. What does the commonly-used term "architectures" really mean? Think user-centric. Think backward-compatible. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.