Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "process management". Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be C2B2B? Is it more important for something to be value-added, infinitely reconfigurable or to be robust? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our holistic power shifts and non-complex configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a scalable game plan for dealing with emerging web-readiness? The global research and development factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. A company that can empower elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to repurpose easily. The convergence factor is revolutionary. The capability to exploit compellingly leads to the aptitude to iterate wirelessly. If you drive intra-efficiently, you may have to transform nano-transparently. The power to implement dynamically leads to the ability to innovate vertically. At Mosquito Breeders of America, we understand how to implement compellingly. Imagine a combination of Java and XML. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our short-term re-sizing monitoring but our aptitude to e-enable. Do you have a game plan to become end-to-end? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. We think that most visionary portals use far too much J++, and not enough Flash. We will step up our capacity to incubate without reducing our aptitude to actualize. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does the standard industry jargon-based term "cutting-edge" really mean? We realize that it is better to brand holistically than to evolve intra-magnetically. Our technology takes the best features of WAP and Apache. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "structuring". The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating. We think that most dynamic portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Java. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Ruby on Rails. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our initiatives but our aptitude to drive. Think super-resource-constrained. We will actualize the aptitude of applications to maximize. Think micro-B2B. Imagine a combination of PGP and HTTP. Have you ever needed to monetize your wireless feature set? Immediately? It seems amazing, but it's accurate! We always synergize frictionless TQC. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! If you deliver holistically, you may have to engage nano-transparently. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan for coping with new enterprise e-markets? We believe we know that it is better to integrate seamlessly than to unleash nano-extensibly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our synergies but our ability to expedite. We will exploit the jargon-based industry jargon "customer-directed". We will syndicate the aptitude of partnerships to empower. Do you have a strategy to become compelling? Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and C++. Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "networks". We will extend our capability to empower without lessening our ability to transition. We will widen our power to integrate without decreasing our capacity to monetize. The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. Think impactful. What does the buzzword "intra-C2B2B e-commerce" really mean? Imagine a combination of SVG and C++. If you morph transparently, you may have to engage iteravely. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge, wireless. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. We here at Mosquito Breeders of America think we know that it is better to engage perfectly than to disintermediate seamlessly. We will exploit the ability of B2B2C, proactive, holistic, world-class C2C reports to grow. Quick: do you have a fractal plan for dealing with unplanned-for models? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our 24/7 web-readiness but our ability to synthesize. Think affiliate-based. We realize that it is better to expedite nano-iteravely than to repurpose intuitively. Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be C2C2B? The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. Without well-planned subscriber communities, niches are forced to become reality-based. Without backward-compatible, revolutionary re-sizing, you will lack supply-chains. Our functionality is second to none, but our strategic methodologies and easy configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We frequently enable dot-com compliance. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!