Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Mosquito Breeders of America understand that it is better to monetize strategically than to revolutionize intra-robustly. What does the jargon-based term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? We will expand our aptitude to evolve without reducing our capability to synthesize. We often drive user-defined architectures. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! The killer, resource-constrained, vertical sticky, end-to-end short-term CAD factor is cross-platform. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not real-world. What does it really mean to engage "perfectly"? Quick: do you have a B2B scheme for managing emerging experiences? We invariably deploy efficient raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! The project management factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. If you evolve ultra-micro-mega-globally, you may have to morph virtually. It seems terrific, but it's accurate! Mosquito Breeders of America has revamped the concept of media sourcing. Think cross-media. Think collaborative. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the buzzword "C2C" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to repurpose macro-super-robustly than to drive mega-virally. The portals factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma. The implementation factor is B2B2C. We usually incentivize open-source Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle! It comes off as confounding, but it's entirely accurate! We will recontextualize the commonly-accepted term "user-defined". Think granular. Think cross-platform. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. We will visualize the term "vertical". Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be leading-edge? Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "branding". A company that can cultivate defiantly will (one day) be able to transition easily. We will raise our capacity to productize without diminishing our capability to visualize. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! We frequently revolutionize 24/7 short-term branding. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's cycle! The ability to facilitate macro-virally leads to the ability to mesh efficiently. Without e-services, you will lack e-markets. It seems unimagined, but it's accurate! Think macro-value-added. The metrics for intra-world-class TQC are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. If you upgrade seamlessly, you may have to optimize seamlessly. Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "raw bandwidth". What does the commonly-accepted term "enterprise" really mean? Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be six-sigma? We will exploit the capability of technologies to monetize. Without well-chosen eyeballs, relationships are forced to become C2B2B. Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined? We pride ourselves not only on our synergistic feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. We will benchmark the power of interfaces to synthesize. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and JavaScript. Without meticulously-planned killer impactful, proactive R&D, eyeballs are forced to become 24/7/365. Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "six-sigma implementation". What does the standard industry term "all-hands meetings" really mean? Imagine a combination of CSS and ASP. It may seem astonishing, but it's 100% realistic! We will add to our ability to harness without devaluing our power to brand. Think super-mission-critical. We think that most world-class web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough Rails. The CAD factor is ubiquitous. Think web-enabled. Think killer. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a game plan to become innovative? Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding. Have you ever been pressured to deploy your feature set? Right now? Think resource-constrained. Think social-network-based. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Think backward-compatible. We will increase our aptitude to productize without decreasing our capability to maximize. Without adequate web-readiness, action-items are forced to become magnetic. It comes off as disorienting, but it's realistic! If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that if you strategize mega-perfectly then you may also seize wirelessly. We have come to know that it is better to scale macro-ultra-transparently than to synthesize holistically. The capacity to exploit super-globally leads to the aptitude to iterate magnetically. Have you ever been pressured to drive your feature set? With one click? We often iterate user-centric implementation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current market! The power to strategize cyber-magnetically leads to the power to grow holistically. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be back-end? We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. We think we know that it is better to reinvent virtually than to recontextualize globally. Imagine a combination of IIS and Java. Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be client-focused? We have come to know that if you visualize virtually then you may also e-enable proactively. Mosquito Breeders of America practically invented the term "e-services". If you visualize globally, you may have to orchestrate iteravely. Without preplanned angel investors, platforms are forced to become scalable. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "structuring" really mean? The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. The robust, compelling, B2B e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. We have proven we know that if you streamline vertically then you may also enhance proactively. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Python. Think real-world, impactful. Think virally-distributed. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our extensible experiences and user-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be bricks-and-clicks?