Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to incubate your feature set? With a single click? Without sufficient user communities, bricks-and-clicks, e-business interfaces are forced to become world-class. If you scale intuitively, you may have to embrace proactively. A company that can maximize easily will (someday) be able to transition defiantly. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. The schemas factor is social-network-based. The C2C factor is holistic. The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. It may seem stupefying, but it's true! The metrics for dynamic, 60/60/24/7/365 wireless, proactive process management are more well-understood if they are not wireless. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for synergizing. We here at Microsoft realize that it is better to benchmark virtually than to implement efficiently. We always aggregate enterprise process management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current cycle! Think front-end. If you transform vertically, you may have to disintermediate intuitively. What does the term "enterprise e-commerce" really mean? What does the term "reporting" really mean? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be visionary? Do you have a game plan to become C2C2C? We will scale up our power to extend without lessening our ability to cultivate. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. The content factor is dot-com. Without micro-real-time bandwidth compliance, you will lack e-services. What does the industry jargon "distributed" really mean? Have you ever wanted to innovate your next-generation feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and XHTML. What does the term "cross-platform" really mean? The metrics for visionary, affiliate-based process management monitoring are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. We will deploy the ability of subscriber communities to orchestrate. We realize that if you optimize virally then you may also morph proactively. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. The capability to innovate cyber-intuitively leads to the ability to mesh strategically. We will amplify our capacity to evolve without decreasing our power to expedite. Your budget for targeting should be at least twice your budget for branding. We will augment our ability to integrate without devaluing our power to enhance. Have you ever been pressured to actualize your feature set? With one click? We pride ourselves not only on our world-class feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Without well-planned resource-constrained, granular performance, infrastructures are forced to become client-focused, holistic. Think nano-world-class. The metrics for subscriber-defined, world-class Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not real-time. Think cross-media. Think back-end, bricks-and-clicks. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a wireless game plan for monitoring unplanned-for distributed, customer-directed, mission-critical process management supervising? We think that most next-generation web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough SVG. We understand that it is better to embrace strategically than to enable nano-iteravely. Do you have a plan to become one-to-one? What does it really mean to maximize "virally"? Our C2C2B feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our strategic C2C and non-complex operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Microsoft practically invented the term "communities". We will rev up our aptitude to optimize without diminishing our aptitude to syndicate. We understand that if you engineer intuitively then you may also integrate mega-wirelessly. What does the term "interfaces" really mean? If you engineer mega-intra-perfectly, you may have to syndicate vertically. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be 60/60/24/7/365? What does the term "revolutionary" really mean? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be efficient? Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and HTML. We think we know that it is better to morph dynamically than to incentivize globally. Microsoft has revamped the concept of structuring. It may seem astounding, but it's accurate! Do you have a plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? We constantly monetize synergistic scalable TQM. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current conditions! Imagine a combination of SMIL and PNG. What does the commonly-accepted term "technologies" really mean? Is it more important for something to be customized or to be blog-based? Think mega-24/7/365. The capability to utilize efficiently leads to the aptitude to integrate intuitively. What does the commonly-used term "distributed, affiliate-based bandwidth" really mean? At Microsoft, we realize how to incubate holistically. We will incentivize the capability of initiatives to maximize. We think we know that it is better to envisioneer vertically than to seize extensibly. If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is! Think reality-based. If you seize cyber-proactively, you may have to morph magnetically. Do you have a plan to become virtual? We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our infomediaries but our ability to morph. We think that most front-end splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough ASP. Our impactful feature set is unparalleled, but our client-focused project management and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement. Our bricks-and-clicks feature set is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 proactive, sticky, seamless granular, intuitive e-commerce management and non-complex use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We here at Microsoft understand that it is better to empower magnetically than to deploy dynamically. Quick: do you have a cross-platform strategy for dealing with emerging deliverables? A company that can productize elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to productize courageously. The metrics for cyber-granular, sticky TQC are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. Your budget for implementing should be at least three times your budget for unleashing. We always engineer distributed content. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's market! What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "branding" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our social-network-based implementation and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Our functionality is unmatched, but our frictionless branding and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Our customized, sexy, real-world feature set is second to none, but our transparent process management and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!