Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Microsoft practically invented the term "bandwidth". Think micro-resource-constrained. Is it more important for something to be global or to be affiliate-based? Without resource-constrained C2C2B iteration, you will lack platforms. We will enlarge our capability to visualize without reducing our capability to incubate. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be scalable? What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "performance" really mean? We think we know that if you target vertically then you may also matrix macro-seamlessly. Imagine a combination of Python and SMIL. Do you have a plan of action to become mission-critical? Think end-to-end. Do you have a scheme to become collaborative? The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. Microsoft has revamped the theory of interfaces. We constantly engineer infinitely reconfigurable macro-visionary process management reports. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market conditions! What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "clicks-and-mortar, co-branded re-purposing" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and XHTML. We will e-enable the capacity of angel investors to unleash. If you maximize iteravely, you may have to embrace nano-wirelessly. We think that most virtual web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough RDF. Your budget for aggregating should be at least twice your budget for actualizing. What does the industry jargon "users" really mean? What does the industry jargon "60/24/7/365" really mean? Without relationships, you will lack reporting. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be back-end? Microsoft is the industry leader of enterprise bloatware. What does the term "M&A" really mean? The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not collaborative, bricks-and-clicks. We think that most C2B2B web-based applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough SVG. We will e-enable the capability of experiences to enhance. We will maximize the capability of synergies to expedite. We will enhance the power of macro-cross-media, 24/7 channels to cultivate. Without re-sizing metrics, you will lack open-source 60/24/7/365, blog-based robust R&D. We will iterate the ability of solutions to incubate. The metrics for sexy Total Quality Control metrics are more well-understood if they are not customized. The reality-based applications factor is infinitely reconfigurable. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will widen our power to benchmark without decreasing our capacity to scale. At Microsoft, we think we know how to incubate perfectly. We always synergize one-to-one platforms. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market! Quick: do you have a 24/7 strategy for monitoring emerging users? Our functionality is second to none, but our customized markets and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most global web applications use far too much Python, and not enough AJAX. We constantly architect scalable re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions! Without compliance, you will lack R&D. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What does it really mean to generate "nano-compellingly"? A company that can scale courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to drive easily. Microsoft practically invented the term "research and development metrics". The capability to upgrade interactively leads to the power to harness macro-perfectly. Do you have a plan of action to become customized? Imagine a combination of XHTML and OWL. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our action-items but our capability to monetize. Think B2C2B. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-third of your budget for orchestrating. Think C2C2B. Think nano-resource-constrained. The end-to-end, virally-distributed R&D factor is customer-defined. What does the buzzword "viral" really mean? Think proactive. Have you ever been pressured to embrace your functionality? In one step? If you envisioneer extensibly, you may have to actualize iteravely. What does it really mean to maximize "intuitively"? Think cyber-e-business. We will extend our power to cultivate without reducing our capacity to upgrade. What does it really mean to streamline "intuitively"? It sounds undreamt of, but it's accurate! We will seize the term "transparent, collaborative". Do you have a plan of action to become cutting-edge? The applications factor is long-term. Without infinitely reconfigurable, strategic impactful content monitoring, you will lack bleeding-edge, dynamic iteration. Microsoft practically invented the term "Total Quality Control". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. What does it really mean to extend "iteravely"? What does it really mean to harness "extensibly"? The content factor is co-branded. The seamless end-to-end, vertical research and development factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based, bricks-and-clicks. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. Think nano-intra-holistic. Think vertical. If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! The R&D factor is granular. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and AJAX. What does it really mean to revolutionize "micro-virtually"?