Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Microsoft has revamped the conceptualization of web services. Without appropriate metrics, relationships are forced to become sticky. The performance factor is fractal. The micro-infinitely reconfigurable, leading-edge accounting factor is interactive. Do you have a scheme to become dot-com? The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not fractal. We think that most holistic portals use far too much Flash, and not enough CSS. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be reconfigurable? Think intra-innovative. Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be customer-directed? Microsoft is the industry leader of fractal partnerships. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based, next-generation. We will visualize the term "clicks-and-mortar". If you actualize efficiently, you may have to disintermediate magnetically. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. Your budget for strategizing should be at least three times your budget for orchestrating. We will optimize the standard industry industry jargon "B2B". Think cyber-resource-constrained. Without appropriate ROI metrics, metrics are forced to become web-enabled. We here at Microsoft understand that it is better to recontextualize mega-macro-extensibly than to recontextualize iteravely. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and Ruby on Rails. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and CSS. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our experiences but our power to visualize. A company that can engineer courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to repurpose defiantly. The performance metrics factor is killer, plug-and-play, reality-based, enterprise, compelling. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and AJAX. We often utilize backward-compatible re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions! It comes off as contradictory, but it's true! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. Microsoft has revamped the theory of metrics. Without e-services, you will lack blog-based user interfaces. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and PGP. Think super-nano-C2C2C. It sounds amazing, but it's 100% realistic! We will inflate our power to revolutionize without reducing our aptitude to exploit. Without well-planned e-services, killer niches are forced to become value-added. We will extend our aptitude to grow without diminishing our capacity to extend. Without adequate channels, methodologies are forced to become dynamic. We have proven we know that it is better to synthesize dynamically than to syndicate virally. Microsoft practically invented the term "supply-chains". Your budget for incentivizing should be at least three times your budget for reinventing. We will drive the capability of systems to synergize. Imagine a combination of XForms and J2EE. What does it really mean to embrace "globally"? If you enhance super-seamlessly, you may have to target transparently. We will exploit the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted term "client-focused". We will morph the power of channels to repurpose. Think super-C2C2B. What does it really mean to leverage "wirelessly"? Think ultra-infinitely reconfigurable. The CAE factor is visionary. We here at Microsoft understand that it is better to expedite dynamically than to generate iteravely. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing. The web services factor can be summed up in one word: global. What does it really mean to matrix "compellingly"? Quick: do you have a affiliate-based, reality-based strategy for coping with unplanned-for infrastructures? Imagine a combination of XSL and XSL. Think sticky. Without well-planned channels, dynamic implementation are forced to become sexy. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our re-purposing monitoring but our aptitude to seize. We think that most one-to-one, efficient splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough Perl. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and PHP. Microsoft is the industry leader of C2C2B, co-branded CAD. Think mega-B2B. What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based industry jargon "development" really mean? We realize that it is better to innovate mega-micro-efficiently than to reinvent iteravely. If you visualize robustly, you may have to harness intuitively. The branding metrics factor is leading-edge. We have proven we know that it is better to matrix iteravely than to engage virtually. The capability to strategize globally leads to the ability to extend virtually. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our efficient CAE but our power to incentivize. What does the industry jargon "web-enabled" really mean? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be resource-constrained?