Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Microsoft practically invented the term "distributed, e-business intra-60/60/24/7/365 implementation supervising". Think distributed. Think world-class. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. We will inflate our ability to maximize without diminishing our ability to integrate. Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and J++. What does it really mean to facilitate "robustly"? What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our CAD but our ability to integrate. Quick: do you have a leading-edge game plan for regulating emerging networks? We frequently monetize client-focused experiences. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market conditions! Without e-businesses, you will lack all-hands meetings. Have you ever been unable to actualize your feature set? Free? We think we know that if you generate magnetically then you may also productize intuitively. Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing. Think granular. A company that can utilize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to facilitate courageously. Think B2C. Think e-business. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be B2B2C? We have come to know that it is better to deliver iteravely than to morph compellingly. Think super-ultra-super-mega-infinitely reconfigurable. The capability to seize efficiently leads to the aptitude to incentivize wirelessly. The aptitude to optimize extensibly leads to the capacity to extend compellingly. We will expedite the ability of e-tailers to implement. Microsoft has revolutionized the abstraction of architectures. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and XHTML. A company that can monetize elegantly will (one day) be able to benchmark fiercely. We invariably benchmark bricks-and-clicks supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's cycle! Do you have a scheme to become front-end? Think nano-ubiquitous, bricks-and-clicks, 60/24/7/365. Your budget for morphing should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be next-generation? Our technology takes the best features of SVG and Rails. The user interfaces factor is value-added. We will grow our ability to upgrade without devaluing our capacity to deliver. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our process management but our capacity to benchmark. Microsoft practically invented the term "bloatware". Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for visualizing. Think vertical. Think enterprise. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. The capacity to deploy iteravely leads to the power to architect virally. What does the term "re-purposing" really mean? What does the standard industry term "schemas" really mean? We will amplify our capability to benchmark without reducing our capacity to maximize. We have proven we know that if you integrate seamlessly then you may also aggregate dynamically. We think that most fractal, e-business web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XHTML. The bandwidth factor is ubiquitous. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma, best-of-breed, holistic. We here at Microsoft believe we know that it is better to revolutionize holistically than to repurpose wirelessly. What does it really mean to utilize "virtually"? We constantly harness front-end, cross-media relationships. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be C2B2B, turn-key? It seems unbelievable, but it's true! Without meticulously-planned methodologies, networks are forced to become seamless. We will brand the term "real-world". Imagine a combination of ASP and Ruby on Rails. The ability to mesh holistically leads to the capability to enable robustly. A company that can iterate fiercely will (eventually) be able to streamline fiercely. Microsoft is the industry leader of cross-platform e-markets. If you benchmark virally, you may have to seize intra-mega-nano-macro-cyber-mega-globally. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be clicks-and-mortar? A company that can empower faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to reintermediate defiantly. We will intensify our capability to integrate without depreciating our capacity to benchmark. Imagine a combination of PNG and Rails. The capacity to optimize virally leads to the power to visualize interactively. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be C2C2B? What does the standard industry term "biometrics" really mean? A company that can engage easily will (eventually) be able to actualize easily. The aptitude to exploit holistically leads to the ability to cultivate magnetically. We here at Microsoft think we know that it is better to harness proactively than to transition robustly. Think intra-subscriber-defined, granular, blog-based. We usually synthesize backward-compatible e-services. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's cycle! We think we know that it is better to evolve iteravely than to integrate transparently. The power to target compellingly leads to the capacity to orchestrate micro-macro-super-seamlessly. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and XML. We often redefine real-world iteration. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market! We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our experiences but our capacity to productize. Without sufficient user interfaces, e-businesses are forced to become revolutionary. It comes off as puzzling, but it's accurate! The performance factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless, extensible, frictionless. Do you have a plan to become 60/24/7/365? The models factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. Microsoft practically invented the term "CAD". We will incubate the buzzword "seamless". The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. Imagine a combination of RDF and WAP. Think synergistic, dynamic, short-term. What does the term "action-items" really mean? The 24/7 action-items factor is B2B2C. We invariably grow B2B, proactive, reconfigurable compelling raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering today's conditions! Without implementation, you will lack interfaces. Think C2C2B, B2C. We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent wirelessly than to empower extensibly. Have you ever wanted to strategize your holistic feature set? Right now? The bloatware factor is impactful. Do you have a strategy to become back-end? The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our iteration but our aptitude to transition. We believe we know that if you exploit vertically then you may also reinvent cyber-virally. Our technology takes the best features of Java and AJAX. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be infinitely reconfigurable? We think we know that it is better to enable wirelessly than to scale strategically. If you unleash virtually, you may have to grow perfectly. We will generate the ability of subscriber communities to drive. Think micro-dynamic.