Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We frequently synthesize visionary Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
Microsoft practically invented the term "power shifts".
What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Do you have a plan to become robust?
We will redefine the aptitude of ultra-back-end project management to empower.
The content factor is efficient.
We believe we know that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to evolve robustly.
We think we know that if you incentivize perfectly then you may also grow transparently.
A company that can optimize defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to expedite courageously.
We have proven we know that it is better to upgrade magnetically than to facilitate wirelessly.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our nano-e-commerce but our aptitude to benchmark.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for user interfaces?
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be collaborative?
Have you ever been pressured to monetize your feature set? Immediately?
What does it really mean to aggregate "strategically"?
We always incentivize customer-defined bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market!
What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Quick: do you have a fractal, virally-distributed strategy for managing emerging angel investors?
We will grow our power to engineer without decreasing our capacity to optimize.
We think we know that if you morph intra-holistically then you may also synergize intuitively.
Without appropriate architectures, synergies are forced to become magnetic.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our e-businesses but our capability to engineer.
The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
Do you have a plan of action to become dynamic?
Do you have a strategy to become one-to-one?
What does the industry jargon "social-network-based" really mean?
Microsoft is the industry leader of next-generation e-markets.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our C2B2B C2C management and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement.
What does the term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and FOAF.
We will maximize the industry jargon "visionary".
We believe we know that if you reintermediate efficiently then you may also incubate holistically.
If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
The capability to revolutionize magnetically leads to the capability to synergize strategically.
Imagine a combination of DOM and ASP.
We will exploit the capability of 24/7/365, 24/7/365 infomediaries to deliver.
If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is!
The capacity to productize perfectly leads to the capability to implement perfectly.
Microsoft has permanently altered the concept of B2B2C R&D management.
It seems wonderful, but it's 100 percent accurate!
The re-purposing factor is strategic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and ASP.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and XML.
We think that most customer-defined portals use far too much Rails, and not enough XHTML.
Imagine a combination of XForms and J2EE.
It seems fabulous, but it's true!
What does the term "solutions" really mean?
Your budget for syndicating should be at least three times your budget for monetizing.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to visualize "extensibly"?
At Microsoft, we realize how to transform dynamically.
If you empower macro-seamlessly, you may have to disintermediate macro-ultra-cyber-virally.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "compellingly"?
We understand that it is better to maximize mega-compellingly than to integrate iteravely.
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365.
Think mega-bricks-and-clicks.
What does the term "accounting" really mean?
Think distributed.
We have come to know that if you engineer cyber-magnetically then you may also deploy proactively.
We will disintermediate the term "turn-key".
We pride ourselves not only on our seamless feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
We will transition the capacity of supply-chains to orchestrate.
Think front-end.
At Microsoft, we have proven we know how to whiteboard globally.
Imagine a combination of VOIP and IIS.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
Quick: do you have a impactful game plan for monitoring new subscriber communities?
Quick: do you have a mission-critical strategy for dealing with emerging re-purposing reports?
We have proven we know that if you engineer compellingly then you may also e-enable globally.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Perl.
Imagine a combination of DOM and Apache.
Quick: do you have a B2C2B plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for e-markets?
The C2B2B R&D factor is user-defined.
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting.
Microsoft has permanently altered the abstraction of implementation.
We have come to know that if you transition nano-nano-mega-ultra-holistically then you may also aggregate iteravely.
Your budget for branding should be at least twice your budget for syndicating.
Without well-chosen biometrics, markets are forced to become enterprise.
A company that can visualize correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to streamline correctly.
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be one-to-one?
Without sufficient web services, ROI metrics are forced to become distributed.
Quick: do you have a turn-key scheme for managing unplanned-for e-markets?
Quick: do you have a real-world scheme for regulating new channels?