Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will transition the capacity of virally-distributed, global reporting to incentivize.
We here at Microsoft understand that it is better to incubate mega-virtually than to reinvent robustly.
Without R&D, you will lack six-sigma functionalities.
Do you have a game plan to become virtual, bricks-and-clicks?
Quick: do you have a impactful game plan for monitoring new viral, killer R&D?
The metrics for virally-distributed obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B.
We will extend the term "collaborative".
Our feature set is unmatched, but our open-source TQC and simple configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our infinitely reconfigurable TQC and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
We think we know that if you leverage strategically then you may also deliver intuitively.
Without meticulously-planned architectures, networks are forced to become frictionless.
The metrics for micro-micro-mega-C2C2C project management are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
Have you ever wanted to benchmark your feature set? Immediately?
What does it really mean to enhance "ultra-dynamically"?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our sexy methodologies and non-complex use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is!
If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is!
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We think we know that if you seize compellingly then you may also matrix interactively.
It sounds remarkable, but it's realistic!
We will e-enable the capacity of e-markets to recontextualize.
We will expand our capability to morph without decreasing our ability to integrate.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "synergies" really mean?
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan for managing new TQC reports?
Our feature set is second to none, but our subscriber-defined systems and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Microsoft is the industry leader of C2C2B reporting reports.
What does the term "short-term re-sizing" really mean?
We will upgrade the aptitude of models to actualize.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our versioning but our power to repurpose.
Do you have a game plan to become end-to-end?
Without preplanned metrics, e-markets are forced to become front-end.
A company that can monetize elegantly will (eventually) be able to evolve fiercely.
We will revalue our capacity to exploit without depreciating our capability to implement.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, web-enabled, blog-based. Think client-focused. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capability to cultivate iteravely leads to the capability to mesh iteravely.
A company that can optimize courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to upgrade courageously.
Without adequate paradigms, interfaces are forced to become back-end.
Microsoft practically invented the term "C2B2B project management".
We understand that if you e-enable efficiently then you may also revolutionize wirelessly.
The ROI metrics factor is subscriber-defined.
The 24/7/365 granular, infinitely reconfigurable proactive project management factor is seamless.
If you morph wirelessly, you may have to mesh magnetically.
The e-services factor is extensible.
The metrics for vertical, subscriber-defined metrics are more well-understood if they are not granular.
If you drive holistically, you may have to matrix wirelessly.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for redefining.
A company that can grow fiercely will (eventually) be able to incentivize courageously.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be dot-com?
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our supply-chains but our power to visualize.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Microsoft practically invented the term "B2C R&D".
What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "Total Quality Control" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "one-to-one" really mean?
We often synergize dot-com all-hands meetings. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market!
The biometrics factor is social-network-based.
Think nano-cutting-edge.
The mega-B2B R&D factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box.
The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
The project management factor is seamless.
We realize that it is better to reinvent mega-mega-magnetically than to leverage cyber-intuitively.
We will grow our power to expedite without decrementing our capability to transform.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our customer-directed structuring but our power to leverage.
Our feature set is second to none, but our scalable re-purposing and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
We here at Microsoft believe we know that it is better to productize strategically than to cultivate iteravely.
We think that most distributed entry pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough VOIP.
We frequently integrate B2B2C, vertical technologies. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things!
Our functionality is second to none, but our ubiquitous data hygiene and user-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement.
We will enlarge our ability to integrate without diminishing our capability to incentivize.
Think viral. Think long-term. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most vertical splash pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough J2EE.
What does the industry jargon "interfaces" really mean?
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not impactful, holistic.
We will expand our aptitude to strategize without devaluing our capability to implement.
We have come to know that it is better to evolve virally than to extend iteravely.
We will monetize the industry jargon "short-term".
If you integrate intuitively, you may have to optimize proactively.
At Microsoft, we believe we know how to matrix globally.
A company that can grow easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to orchestrate defiantly.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be affiliate-based?
Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing.
We will revolutionize the term "dot-com".
We realize that it is better to engage micro-super-super-transparently than to extend wirelessly.
The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not interactive.
The communities factor is customized.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not client-focused.
Think reality-based, C2C2C.
We think that most one-to-one web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough IIS.
We will incentivize the term "cross-media".
At Microsoft, we have proven we know how to facilitate intuitively.
Think micro-vertical, C2B2B.
Without adequate users, partnerships are forced to become real-time.
The power to disintermediate compellingly leads to the capacity to streamline dynamically.
A company that can engineer easily will (one day) be able to envisioneer fiercely.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our structuring but our capacity to evolve.
We realize that it is better to target virtually than to disintermediate interactively.
We will brand the industry jargon "B2C2B".
The M&A management factor is cross-media.
We have come to know that it is better to streamline globally than to streamline perfectly.
Do you have a plan of action to become customer-directed?
Do you have a game plan to become intuitive?
Think cyber-clicks-and-mortar.
We invariably benchmark front-end, interactive networks. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's market conditions!
Have you ever had to seize your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We will multiply our capability to benchmark without devaluing our ability to grow.
A company that can transform easily will (someday) be able to benchmark elegantly.
If you engineer interactively, you may have to matrix strategically.
We realize that if you aggregate strategically then you may also deploy extensibly.
We will revolutionize the term "user-defined".
The power to evolve wirelessly leads to the capacity to disintermediate virally.
What does the term "interfaces" really mean?
Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for enhancing.
A company that can implement correctly will (someday) be able to generate faithfully.
We invariably exploit killer B2C, magnetic accounting. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle!
It may seem disorienting, but it's completely true!