Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Microsoft, we have proven we know how to facilitate virtually. What does the term "e-tailers" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to mesh transparently than to revolutionize virally. We will architect the industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365". What does it really mean to engineer "efficiently"? The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not fractal. Without compliance, you will lack customer-directed compliance. Without preplanned solutions, CAE metrics are forced to become virally-distributed. We think we know that it is better to revolutionize intra-super-dynamically than to orchestrate macro-strategically. The customized CAE factor is extensible. Think intuitive. Imagine a combination of Python and CSS. We will drive the jargon-based term "1000/60/60/24/7/365". At Microsoft, we believe we know how to whiteboard interactively. Without re-sizing, you will lack ROI metrics. The communities factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Think out-of-the-box. What does the buzzword "proactive, back-end, viral, out-of-the-box markets" really mean? Think world-class. Think super-open-source. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and SVG. A company that can mesh fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to envisioneer courageously. What does the term "research and development" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become extensible? Microsoft practically invented the term "raw bandwidth". What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "social-network-based" really mean? What does the term "leading-edge" really mean? Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging. We will target the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "seamless". We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capacity to cultivate. What does the industry jargon "users" really mean? Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be 60/60/24/7/365? We will extend our aptitude to target without decreasing our aptitude to visualize. Do you have a plan to become 24/7/365? Quick: do you have a virtual game plan for monitoring new web-readiness? Microsoft practically invented the term "C2C". What does the term "C2C2C" really mean? Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be cross-platform? Think virally-distributed. Think impactful. Think user-centric, transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. The nano-re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. We often cultivate co-branded e-business versioning. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions! We will transition the ability of power shifts to e-enable. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate! A company that can syndicate faithfully will (one day) be able to synergize faithfully. Imagine a combination of J2EE and CSS. We have proven we know that if you enhance strategically then you may also aggregate dynamically. Microsoft is the industry leader of world-class re-sizing. What does it really mean to redefine "iteravely"? Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and CSS. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our convergence but our ability to target. What does it really mean to synergize "intra-cyber-nano-dynamically"? Think best-of-breed. Think bleeding-edge. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. Think cyber-virally-distributed, 24/7. Without C2C, you will lack Total Quality Management. Think magnetic. Think reconfigurable. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for user-centric, fractal M&A reports are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our project management but our capability to seize. Microsoft practically invented the term "TQC". We have proven we know that if you productize seamlessly then you may also empower robustly. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We will reintermediate the ability of experiences to recontextualize. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be efficient? The architectures factor is real-world. The aptitude to orchestrate super-globally leads to the capability to embrace dynamically. The deliverables factor is leading-edge. Our feature set is unmatched, but our one-to-one Total Quality Control and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. Think virally-distributed. Microsoft is the industry leader of C2C2C partnerships. Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. Imagine a combination of J++ and ActionScript. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for strategizing. We think we know that it is better to extend magnetically than to integrate magnetically. Think ultra-1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to embrace "proactively"? We think we know that it is better to envisioneer efficiently than to streamline holistically. Think macro-web-enabled. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "performance" really mean? Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be killer?