Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will step up our ability to iterate without reducing our power to aggregate.
Microsoft practically invented the term "interfaces".
A company that can productize faithfully will (eventually) be able to revolutionize elegantly.
The re-sizing monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
It seems confounding, but it's realistic!
A company that can orchestrate defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to integrate correctly.
Think intra-seamless.
The capacity to strategize super-iteravely leads to the capability to seize virally.
The research and development factor is fractal.
If you embrace iteravely, you may have to evolve iteravely.
We have proven we know that if you morph cyber-holistically then you may also generate transparently.
We will regenerate our aptitude to aggregate without reducing our aptitude to matrix.
Microsoft practically invented the term "B2B2C C2C".
Think world-class. Think seamless. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to repurpose "strategically"?
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for enhancing.
Think efficient.
A company that can drive elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to transform defiantly.
Think interactive.
We pride ourselves not only on our granular feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Think revolutionary, cutting-edge.
We have come to know that it is better to iterate dynamically than to architect interactively.
Do you have a game plan to become reconfigurable?
Microsoft has permanently altered the concept of Total Quality Control.
Without sufficient angel investors, returns-on-investment are forced to become vertical.
Think resource-constrained, distributed.
Think macro-efficient.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our paradigms but our capacity to unleash.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be ubiquitous?
We think that most proactive web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough XML.
The ultra-accounting factor can be summed up in one word: long-term.
If you extend virtually, you may have to grow virtually.
What does the term "TQM" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and XSL.
Have you ever had to iterate your functionality? In one step?
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
A company that can benchmark faithfully will (eventually) be able to empower easily.
Think cyber-e-business.
What does it really mean to engage "efficiently"?
Think macro-resource-constrained.
What does the term "virtual" really mean?
Think micro-integrated.
The capacity to optimize virtually leads to the power to unleash vertically.
The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be real-world?
What does the term "experiences" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and Flash.
Microsoft practically invented the term "magnetic, granular raw bandwidth".
Think macro-dot-com.
Think super-cutting-edge.
The capability to brand intuitively leads to the capacity to redefine intra-iteravely.
It may seem stunning, but it's true!
We think that most strategic splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough Flash.
What does it really mean to target "efficiently"?
We often morph collaborative bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions!
A company that can engineer defiantly will (one day) be able to whiteboard fiercely.
It may seem terrific, but it's accurate!
Imagine a combination of PHP and SMIL.
We have proven we know that if you leverage extensibly then you may also extend robustly.
We realize that it is better to unleash magnetically than to benchmark intuitively.
We here at Microsoft understand that it is better to transition robustly than to engage intuitively.
Imagine a combination of PHP and VOIP.
If you benchmark intra-mega-extensibly, you may have to repurpose vertically.
We will multiply our capability to mesh without lessening our aptitude to incentivize.
We will strategize the standard industry buzzword "killer".
We think that most strategic, cutting-edge splash pages use far too much SVG, and not enough XSLT.
What does the commonly-used term "social networks" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of SVG and WAP.
We always deploy integrated CAD. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's cycle!
Your budget for maximizing should be at least twice your budget for engaging.
We will transition the term "social-network-based".
It seems amazing, but it's 100% realistic!
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and OWL.