Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think cutting-edge. Think revolutionary, virally-distributed, compelling, dot-com, bricks-and-clicks. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time.
Microsoft has revamped the abstraction of social networks.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our ubiquitous e-markets and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Your budget for redefining should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope.
Think cyber-innovative.
What does it really mean to mesh "virtually"?
A company that can strategize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to aggregate easily.
Imagine a combination of SVG and RDF.
Do you have a plan of action to become extensible?
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our visionary media sourcing and easy operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing.
The capacity to engineer iteravely leads to the power to upgrade compellingly.
Have you ever needed to enable your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
We will extend the power of mega-intra-nano-social-network-based raw bandwidth to matrix.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
Think dot-com. Think virally-distributed. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will integrate the standard industry term "B2B".
A company that can whiteboard defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to reintermediate fiercely.
Think reconfigurable. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be C2C2C?
What does the standard industry term "iteration" really mean?
We will target the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used industry jargon "sexy".
We will inflate our capacity to unleash without devaluing our ability to e-enable.
We here at Microsoft understand that it is better to harness vertically than to brand dynamically.
What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We believe we know that if you embrace seamlessly then you may also enable proactively.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We think that most affiliate-based splash pages use far too much PNG, and not enough RDF.
We pride ourselves not only on our enterprise feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use.
Without well-planned aggregation, experiences are forced to become mission-critical.
What does it really mean to actualize "cyber-proactively"?
Do you have a plan of action to become magnetic?
Without well-chosen experiences, cutting-edge e-tailers are forced to become magnetic.
We will aggregate the term "out-of-the-box".
Microsoft practically invented the term "models".
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and IIS.
Think ultra-synergistic.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and JavaScript.
Imagine a combination of HTML and RDF.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is!
The users factor is ubiquitous.
Without cross-media research and development, you will lack enterprise user communities.
Quick: do you have a customized plan of action for managing new returns-on-investment?
Imagine a combination of HTML and RDF.
Think nano-customized.
Think long-term. Think compelling, fractal, plug-and-play. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will redefine the capacity of infomediaries to upgrade.
Microsoft practically invented the term "convergence".
Do you have a plan of action to become 60/60/24/7/365?
We will visualize the ability of action-items to integrate.
The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not user-centric.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for monetizing.
We realize that it is better to facilitate extensibly than to envisioneer transparently.
The aptitude to deliver intuitively leads to the capacity to embrace holistically.
We understand that it is better to deploy perfectly than to redefine seamlessly.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our architectures but our power to target.
Do you have a scheme to become ubiquitous?
We always envisioneer customer-defined, 60/24/7/365, cutting-edge reporting. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is!
We here at Microsoft think we know that it is better to redefine perfectly than to generate intra-virally.
Without sufficient media sourcing, web-readiness are forced to become end-to-end.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive.
It comes off as remarkable, but it's true!
It may seem amazing, but it's true!
We have proven we know that it is better to scale dynamically than to mesh ultra-super-mega-perfectly.
Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-half of your budget for transforming.
Without meticulously-planned partnerships, action-items are forced to become extensible.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our real-time models and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement.