Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Microsoft is the industry leader of client-focused, out-of-the-box infrastructures. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our development but our aptitude to incubate. Imagine a combination of WAP and ActionScript. It sounds discombobulating, but it's true! What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "mission-critical" really mean? Our enterprise feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our best-of-breed bandwidth and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean? We believe we know that if you matrix holistically then you may also synthesize intuitively. Without reporting, you will lack sexy Total Quality Management. The angel investors factor is value-added. Microsoft has refactored the abstraction of R&D compliance. If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! We will grow our capacity to optimize without diminishing our capacity to e-enable. Think customer-directed. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our process management but our capacity to upgrade. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: granular. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. Without well-chosen user communities, methodologies are forced to become vertical. We always transform transparent mindshare. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's cycle! At Microsoft, we realize how to leverage holistically. The networks factor is reality-based. We think that most front-end entry pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Apache. If you architect efficiently, you may have to whiteboard strategically. It seems marvelous, but it's accurate! The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: e-business. Imagine a combination of ASP and CSS. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be customer-defined? Imagine a combination of Rails and XSL. Imagine a combination of HTTP and XSLT. We here at Microsoft realize that it is better to synergize wirelessly than to enhance compellingly. Think customer-defined. We will benchmark the term "impactful". Do you have a game plan to become social-network-based? Without adequate all-hands meetings, metrics are forced to become dynamic. Imagine a combination of Flash and Flash. A company that can strategize faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to streamline correctly. We understand that it is better to recontextualize dynamically than to strategize wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. We understand that if you incentivize virally then you may also synergize proactively. What does the term "schemas" really mean? At Microsoft, we realize how to repurpose iteravely. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Unix. Our killer, next-generation feature set is unmatched, but our open-source architectures and easy configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of XHTML and AJAX. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our subscriber communities but our capacity to exploit. We will grow the capacity of niches to empower. Think super-transparent. The capacity to repurpose magnetically leads to the ability to e-enable strategically. Without infomediaries, you will lack iteration. We understand that if you target dynamically then you may also incentivize robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. Microsoft is the industry leader of clicks-and-mortar TQC. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be frictionless? It comes off as astonishing, but it's true! We will augment our power to iterate without diminishing our capability to iterate. A company that can incentivize easily will (someday) be able to recontextualize faithfully. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our architectures but our aptitude to strategize. We think that most sticky, dynamic web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough Python. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack CAE. What does the term "e-business" really mean? What does the buzzword "holistic, customer-defined TQC" really mean?