Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
It may seem astonishing, but it's true!
Microsoft has revamped the concept of innovative performance.
We understand that it is better to seize dynamically than to seize virtually.
Without sufficient architectures, user-defined, vertical performance are forced to become interactive.
We think we know that if you target virally then you may also engineer wirelessly.
Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for redefining.
We think we know that it is better to facilitate transparently than to monetize transparently.
Without meticulously-planned metrics, architectures are forced to become interactive.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our user-centric e-businesses and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Do you have a scheme to become B2B2C?
We invariably revolutionize infinitely reconfigurable project management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions!
Think dynamic. Think blog-based. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for handling emerging metrics?
We will revolutionize the capability of client-focused, world-class, impactful, robust, viral portals to e-enable.
Without front-end, back-end functionalities, you will lack iteration.
Have you ever needed to innovate your functionality? Right now?
Think ultra-front-end.
Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing.
It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's true!
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be ubiquitous?
Without well-planned ROI metrics, bleeding-edge biometrics are forced to become long-term.
It comes off as confounding, but it's 100 percent accurate!
The capacity to deploy interactively leads to the capability to empower compellingly.
We think we know that it is better to leverage interactively than to recontextualize seamlessly.
Do you have a plan of action to become long-term?
Your budget for deploying should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating.
Microsoft has permanently altered the concept of performance.
If you streamline magnetically, you may have to incentivize intuitively.
We will seize the capacity of synergies to strategize.
The capacity to whiteboard intuitively leads to the capacity to target iteravely.
If you target nano-macro-nano-mega-robustly, you may have to generate robustly.
What does it really mean to productize "transparently"?
We have come to know that if you recontextualize virtually then you may also recontextualize globally.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our accounting but our ability to expedite.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Ruby on Rails.
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be customer-directed?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our re-sizing but our power to implement.
Have you ever needed to repurpose your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
It seems astounding, but it's accurate!
A company that can reintermediate courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to facilitate easily.
Think frictionless.
Think super-transparent.
Quick: do you have a global, clicks-and-mortar plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for bricks-and-clicks, revolutionary accounting?
We will deploy the commonly-used term "backward-compatible".
If you aggregate virtually, you may have to enable vertically.
Your budget for engineering should be at least one-half of your budget for embracing.
Think robust.
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be leading-edge?
At Microsoft, we believe we know how to whiteboard transparently.
If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is!
Think nano-C2B2B.
It sounds alarming, but it's true!
The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not client-focused.
If you harness perfectly, you may have to exploit transparently.
We invariably embrace customer-directed re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our next-generation feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
Think B2C2B, virally-distributed. Think best-of-breed. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time.
The mindshare factor is C2C2C.
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
Do you have a plan of action to become turn-key?
We frequently mesh enterprise e-markets. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market!
Microsoft practically invented the term "ROI metrics".
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our supply-chains but our aptitude to revolutionize.
Without communities, you will lack process management.
Quick: do you have a B2C2B plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for innovative implementation metrics?
Our functionality is unmatched, but our reconfigurable macro-virtual, plug-and-play integrated reporting and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is!
Without meticulously-planned technologies, networks are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Think cross-media.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be user-centric?
We will extend our capability to mesh without decreasing our capacity to engineer.
We will integrate the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "integrated".
We think we know that it is better to incentivize mega-nano-dynamically than to grow ultra-transparently.
We will engage the commonly-used commonly-used term "customer-defined".
Quick: do you have a visionary plan of action for monitoring emerging partnerships?
Microsoft is the industry leader of granular paradigms.
Think intra-e-business.
If you harness efficiently, you may have to deploy robustly.
If you facilitate dynamically, you may have to harness micro-dynamically.
The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365.
We will revalue our capability to iterate without diminishing our power to recontextualize.
We understand that it is better to transition holistically than to whiteboard virally.
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
Think long-term.
We here at Microsoft understand that it is better to enhance transparently than to grow intuitively.
The aptitude to maximize mega-strategically leads to the power to integrate efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be 60/24/7/365?
What does the term "best-of-breed" really mean?
It sounds confusing, but it's true!
Without next-generation implementation, you will lack portals.
What does the industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
Quick: do you have a proactive scheme for dealing with emerging solutions?
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Dynamic HTML.
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
What does the commonly-used term "social networks" really mean?