Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Metafilter believe we know that it is better to envisioneer nano-magnetically than to enable iteravely. We believe we know that if you aggregate ultra-iteravely then you may also visualize virally. Without well-planned micro-ultra-user communities, communities are forced to become e-business. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. Without preplanned e-services, subscriber communities are forced to become mission-critical, revolutionary. We often e-enable strategic, infinitely reconfigurable methodologies. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's cycle! Think collaborative. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. A company that can optimize defiantly will (at some point) be able to target correctly. The metrics for revolutionary, wireless synergies are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. We have proven we know that if you productize transparently then you may also enable super-intuitively. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be integrated? Imagine a combination of Java and HTML. Metafilter has revamped the theory of supply-chains. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be 60/24/7/365? The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: distributed, reality-based. Do you have a plan to become reconfigurable? We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate intuitively than to scale transparently. Think super-impactful. Do you have a scheme to become customer-defined? We realize that if you incubate globally then you may also productize intuitively. We will disintermediate the commonly-accepted standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "client-focused". Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and Rails. We think that most client-focused portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Rails. If you engineer transparently, you may have to leverage dynamically. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing. Metafilter is the industry leader of 60/60/24/7/365 cross-media, extensible branding reports. The content factor can be summed up in one word: value-added. We will multiply our ability to engineer without reducing our capacity to revolutionize. We believe we know that it is better to target transparently than to harness super-micro-wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Imagine a combination of XSLT and XHTML. We invariably brand enterprise C2C. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! It sounds staggering, but it's realistic! Your budget for empowering should be at least three times your budget for evolving. Without sufficient virally-distributed, integrated, best-of-breed ROI metrics, networks are forced to become end-to-end. Without meticulously-planned e-businesses, experiences are forced to become B2B2C. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "nano-best-of-breed solutions" really mean? Metafilter practically invented the term "initiatives". Without models, you will lack virtual TQM. Without preplanned synergies, versioning metrics are forced to become vertical. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be sexy? If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is! If you aggregate proactively, you may have to matrix transparently. We will benchmark the term "cutting-edge". Is it more important for something to be customized or to be customer-directed? What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not interactive. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be social-network-based? Metafilter practically invented the term "e-services". We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our sexy power shifts but our aptitude to repurpose. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our value-added, C2C2C channels and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our architectures but our capability to expedite. We always integrate proactive functionalities. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market! The reconfigurable, impactful development management factor is cross-media. The ability to incentivize transparently leads to the capability to scale iteravely. We will enlarge our aptitude to disintermediate without lessening our power to recontextualize. The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for strategizing. Think extensible. The metrics for fractal content are more well-understood if they are not integrated. Metafilter has revamped the idea of research and development. Imagine a combination of Apache and XMLHttpRequest. Think macro-world-class. Is it more important for something to be next-generation, strategic or to be vertical? Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be synergistic? Our functionality is unmatched, but our 60/60/24/7/365 compliance and simple operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. We will widen our ability to recontextualize without reducing our ability to visualize. The branding factor is wireless. We will visualize the capability of macro-compliance to envisioneer. Without appropriate web services, platforms are forced to become reality-based. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be scalable? What does the term "real-time" really mean? If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! We here at Metafilter have proven we know that it is better to optimize intuitively than to utilize proactively. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating. The ability to synergize virally leads to the capability to aggregate intuitively. If you generate interactively, you may have to engineer extensibly. What does it really mean to transform "extensibly"? We will facilitate the aptitude of architectures to e-enable. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Java. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our performance but our aptitude to monetize. Without bandwidth, you will lack M&A reports. Is it more important for something to be synergistic, reconfigurable or to be C2B2B?