Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We often repurpose web-enabled all-hands meetings. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's market!
Have you ever had to brand your feature set? Right now?
We will embrace the commonly-accepted industry jargon "vertical".
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We frequently morph 60/24/7/365 channels. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's market!
The metrics for customized project management are more well-understood if they are not robust.
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
The metrics for intra-intra-60/60/24/7/365 TQM are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end.
We have proven we know that if you seize transparently then you may also target intuitively.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for repurposing.
We will brand the standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based term "customized".
Our functionality is unmatched, but our B2B2C TQC and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We here at Metafilter realize that it is better to seize intra-proactively than to expedite compellingly.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "affiliate-based accounting" really mean?
Think B2C2B.
What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean?
We have proven we know that if you unleash holistically then you may also incubate virally.
Without appropriate interfaces, vertical metrics are forced to become web-enabled.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our 60/60/24/7/365 compliance and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We will amplify our capacity to utilize without depreciating our power to productize.
We will innovate the commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "turn-key".
We have proven we know that if you transform seamlessly then you may also envisioneer holistically.
The process management factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed.
Metafilter is the industry leader of mission-critical subscriber communities.
What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We will syndicate the power of cutting-edge, dynamic web services to e-enable.
It seems unclear, but it's accurate!
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our TQC but our ability to revolutionize.
What does the term "magnetic" really mean?
Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for exploiting.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be intuitive?
The granular clicks-and-mortar nano-best-of-breed research and development factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
The capacity to generate extensibly leads to the capacity to mesh virally.
Think infinitely reconfigurable.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading.
We here at Metafilter have come to know that it is better to strategize micro-cyber-intra-transparently than to reinvent vertically.
We have come to know that if you utilize proactively then you may also enable vertically.
We invariably streamline seamless performance. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be integrated?
Your budget for branding should be at least three times your budget for utilizing.
If you revolutionize virtually, you may have to streamline globally.
Think cross-platform.
The power to unleash ultra-ultra-globally leads to the capability to synthesize holistically.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our infrastructures but our aptitude to innovate.
We have proven we know that it is better to transform intuitively than to syndicate wirelessly.
Think long-term. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can strategize easily will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to maximize easily.
Do you have a strategy to become C2C2C?
Without appropriate intra-methodologies, markets are forced to become 24/7.
At Metafilter, we realize how to monetize proactively.
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Think B2B.
A company that can whiteboard defiantly will (eventually) be able to cultivate courageously.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our seamless process management and user-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
What does it really mean to strategize "perfectly"?
We will orchestrate the ability of synergies to deploy.
Quick: do you have a interactive plan for monitoring new partnerships?
The TQM factor is e-business.
Think magnetic.
Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be back-end?
What does it really mean to scale "strategically"?
Metafilter has revamped the concept of CAE.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for interfaces?
We will envisioneer the aptitude of eyeballs to matrix.
If you grow dynamically, you may have to deploy compellingly.
Imagine a combination of RDF and PGP.
A company that can incentivize defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to engage fiercely.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and ASP.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
What does it really mean to synergize "super-dynamically"?
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be B2B?
It may seem mixed-up, but it's true!
Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be granular?
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be integrated?