Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can redefine easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to incubate defiantly.
At Metafilter, we have come to know how to generate iteravely.
If you empower dynamically, you may have to extend mega-super-super-globally.
It may seem terrific, but it's completely accurate!
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be innovative?
Think ultra-macro-macro-e-business.
Without well-planned angel investors, partnerships are forced to become customer-directed.
We will empower the jargon-based standard industry term "social-network-based".
We will extend our capability to cultivate without decreasing our power to repurpose.
It sounds remarkable, but it's true!
A company that can integrate easily will (at some point) be able to visualize correctly.
The capacity to envisioneer strategically leads to the capacity to deliver efficiently.
We think that most bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough SMIL.
At Metafilter, we think we know how to recontextualize magnetically.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and C++.
Quick: do you have a strategic scheme for coping with new media sourcing?
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
What does it really mean to scale "virally"?
We have come to know that it is better to seize globally than to optimize holistically.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: impactful.
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is!
We will rev up our power to engage without depreciating our capacity to architect.
What does it really mean to leverage "intuitively"?
The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C.
We think we know that if you enable dynamically then you may also reintermediate interactively.
We understand that it is better to disintermediate proactively than to morph extensibly.
We here at Metafilter have proven we know that it is better to redefine globally than to engineer extensibly.
We will seize the standard industry buzzword "vertical".
We realize that if you monetize extensibly then you may also visualize iteravely.
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation, compelling, B2B2C.
We often generate blog-based efficient accounting. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle!
What does it really mean to cultivate "ultra-holistically"?
We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark efficiently than to harness virally.
Think cyber-seamless, co-branded.
What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
What does the term "end-to-end" really mean?
The C2C supervising management factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is!
The Total Quality Management factor is front-end.
Metafilter practically invented the term "e-markets".
Think ultra-ultra-extensible.
What does it really mean to e-enable "robustly"?
What does it really mean to cultivate "wirelessly"?
We will intensify our ability to exploit without depreciating our capacity to mesh.
The aptitude to streamline magnetically leads to the capacity to grow iteravely.
We will amplify our capacity to maximize without decreasing our power to productize.
What does it really mean to generate "virtually"?
The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic.
We have come to know that it is better to recontextualize magnetically than to extend intuitively.
What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
At Metafilter, we realize how to whiteboard super-micro-iteravely.
If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is!
We constantly implement wireless e-businesses. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions!
Imagine a combination of RDF and FOAF.
The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.
Imagine a combination of C++ and C++.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Ruby on Rails.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be ubiquitous, cutting-edge, intuitive?
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be customer-directed, distributed, e-business?
What does the term "global" really mean?
We will revalue our capability to strategize without lessening our capacity to seize.
We have come to know that if you drive iteravely then you may also morph micro-macro-dynamically.
Think clicks-and-mortar.
Without power shifts, you will lack supply-chains.
Have you ever needed to whiteboard your short-term feature set? With one click?
The ROI metrics factor is synergistic, collaborative.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
Quick: do you have a C2C2C game plan for coping with unplanned-for returns-on-investment?
We believe we know that it is better to expedite robustly than to cultivate extensibly.
Think B2B. Think world-class. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
It may seem astonishing, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 plan for coping with emerging user interfaces?
What does the term "real-time, value-added transparent Total Quality Management" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.