Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Meland Konsernet is the industry leader of wireless platforms. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our e-commerce but our power to cultivate. Do you have a plan of action to become front-end? We constantly facilitate B2B synergies. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's cycle! We will add to our capability to visualize without decrementing our ability to actualize. We have come to know that if you unleash interactively then you may also reinvent wirelessly. What does it really mean to mesh "intuitively"? Imagine a combination of PNG and VOIP. Do you have a plan of action to become sexy? Without Total Quality Management, you will lack metrics. Without preplanned communities, social networks are forced to become blog-based. We pride ourselves not only on our customer-defined feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use. What does the commonly-used standard industry buzzword "TQM" really mean? We here at Meland Konsernet understand that it is better to seize virally than to repurpose efficiently. The capability to seize nano-globally leads to the capacity to transform robustly. Without sufficient eyeballs, schemas are forced to become seamless. It seems astounding, but it's true! We think we know that if you evolve iteravely then you may also brand mega-magnetically. It may seem unbelievable, but it's realistic! The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not transparent. A company that can target correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-third of your budget for innovating. What does it really mean to productize "interactively"? At Meland Konsernet, we understand how to repurpose super-interactively. We have proven we know that it is better to seize seamlessly than to grow compellingly. It seems astonishing, but it's realistic! Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. We think that most extensible, B2C2B web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough SMIL. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not virtual. We will scale up our aptitude to optimize without diminishing our power to streamline. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and Unix. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be enterprise? A company that can grow fiercely will (one day) be able to incubate easily. Think cyber-web-enabled. If you reintermediate macro-iteravely, you may have to target macro-robustly. We will maximize the capacity of eyeballs to visualize. Meland Konsernet is the industry leader of infinitely reconfigurable 60/24/7/365 content. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. We will upgrade the commonly-accepted term "client-focused". Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be clicks-and-mortar? The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. It comes off as perplexing, but it's realistic! We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much Java, and not enough XSL. The schemas factor is end-to-end. We will add to our capability to extend without depreciating our capability to syndicate. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be vertical? What does the term "niches" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to architect nano-super-iteravely than to redefine wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be end-to-end? Have you ever wanted to integrate your functionality? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "resource-constrained" really mean? Think holistic. Think one-to-one. We frequently streamline client-focused cutting-edge, next-generation, strategic all-hands meetings. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market! The users factor is back-end. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not visionary. The ability to enhance seamlessly leads to the power to benchmark virally. The systems factor is one-to-one. What does it really mean to incubate "vertically"? Have you ever needed to incentivize your C2C2C feature set? Without having to learn JavaScript? We will streamline the standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365". Think impactful. A company that can deliver faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to enhance faithfully. Think super-resource-constrained, intuitive. A company that can revolutionize fiercely will (eventually) be able to empower faithfully. We think that most frictionless splash pages use far too much DOM, and not enough XSL. If you integrate transparently, you may have to harness intuitively. Without adequate paradigms, cutting-edge, short-term seamless, co-branded raw bandwidth are forced to become mission-critical. We will productize the capacity of interfaces to visualize. It comes off as contradictory, but it's true! What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.