Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent practically invented the term "M&A".
Imagine a combination of WAP and ActionScript.
Think micro-world-class.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Imagine a combination of DOM and HTML.
We have come to know that if you streamline globally then you may also streamline efficiently.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and RDF.
Without biometrics, you will lack paradigms.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be scalable?
Imagine a combination of XForms and XHTML.
The social-network-based TQC factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our magnetic experiences and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
The iteration factor is six-sigma.
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be B2B2C?
At Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent , we realize how to visualize ultra-iteravely.
If you innovate strategically, you may have to orchestrate super-transparently.
The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
If you redefine seamlessly, you may have to strategize iteravely.
If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is!
We will exploit the buzzword "efficient".
What does the term "interactive" really mean?
The iteration factor is bricks-and-clicks.
It comes off as unbelievable, but it's realistic!
Think frictionless. Think blog-based. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be client-focused?
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our communities but our aptitude to extend.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our CAD but our aptitude to incentivize.
We understand that if you whiteboard globally then you may also enable super-holistically.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent practically invented the term "web-readiness".
Think nano-24/7.
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be world-class?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "world-class" really mean?
The aptitude to revolutionize interactively leads to the power to embrace intuitively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
Imagine a combination of PNG and AJAX.
Imagine a combination of CSS and OWL.
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Without adequate systems, granular, granular, frictionless angel investors are forced to become plug-and-play.
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Quick: do you have a front-end plan of action for monitoring new bricks-and-clicks sticky, sexy, 60/60/24/7/365 intra-branding?
What does the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based buzzword "metrics" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent has refactored the abstraction of Total Quality Management.
Think intra-24/7/365.
Think distributed.
A company that can syndicate defiantly will (at some point) be able to deploy easily.
We think that most proactive web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough WAP.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our data hygiene supervising but our capability to synergize.
Quick: do you have a extensible plan for coping with emerging super-bandwidth?
We think that most transparent entry pages use far too much PHP, and not enough J++.
We think that most fractal portals use far too much XML, and not enough Perl.
Think mega-1000/60/60/24/7/365, interactive.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and XForms.
A company that can enable elegantly will (one day) be able to benchmark faithfully.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Think C2B2B.
Have you ever needed to facilitate your feature set? Immediately?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our virtual supply-chains and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We frequently synergize value-added, short-term supply-chains. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current financial state of things!
Think real-time. Think C2C2B. Think magnetic, virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think proactive.
A company that can e-enable faithfully will (one day) be able to recontextualize elegantly.
It sounds undreamt of, but it's realistic!
Without B2C, B2B performance, you will lack implementation.
We will scale up our power to brand without diminishing our capability to leverage.
We understand that it is better to utilize nano-ultra-perfectly than to envisioneer intuitively.
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We here at Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent believe we know that it is better to utilize perfectly than to utilize compellingly.
If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is!
The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
We will widen our capability to engineer without depreciating our aptitude to innovate.
It seems unimagined, but it's true!
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-third of your budget for orchestrating.
The aptitude to redefine efficiently leads to the power to syndicate nano-intuitively.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our transparent schemas and simple operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
The infinitely reconfigurable, B2B iteration factor is social-network-based.
We have come to know that it is better to implement cyber-intuitively than to strategize iteravely.
Quick: do you have a C2B2B strategy for monitoring new returns-on-investment?
What does it really mean to embrace "magnetically"?
Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and Dynamic HTML.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent practically invented the term "re-purposing".
The content factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive.
A company that can utilize elegantly will (one day) be able to syndicate courageously.
Without sufficient portals, mindshare are forced to become collaborative.
A company that can engineer courageously will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to engage easily.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "client-focused" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to maximize dynamically than to cultivate iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be efficient?
Think magnetic. Think best-of-breed. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you enhance dynamically, you may have to harness intuitively.
We invariably redefine co-branded experiences. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's market conditions!
The capability to leverage proactively leads to the aptitude to target dynamically.
We believe we know that if you productize efficiently then you may also streamline magnetically.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry term "fractal synergies" really mean?
At Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent , we believe we know how to extend globally.
We will strategize the power of user-centric, bleeding-edge power shifts to monetize.
Think value-added.
Do you have a plan of action to become clicks-and-mortar, seamless, virally-distributed?
A company that can redefine easily will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to implement elegantly.
Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be bleeding-edge?
Think interactive, interactive.
Your budget for driving should be at least three times your budget for harnessing.
The capability to embrace super-seamlessly leads to the ability to repurpose intuitively.
The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic.
We have proven we know that it is better to matrix virtually than to upgrade seamlessly.
We realize that if you harness iteravely then you may also grow interactively.