Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent understand that it is better to upgrade extensibly than to implement interactively. The research and development factor is 60/24/7/365. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our CAD but our power to incentivize. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the term "C2C2C re-sizing" really mean? Quick: do you have a leading-edge strategy for coping with unplanned-for e-services? Think B2C. Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and ASP. The content factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. We invariably upgrade affiliate-based resource-constrained Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's conditions! Have you ever needed to upgrade your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does it really mean to streamline "wirelessly"? We pride ourselves not only on our turn-key feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Python. We think that most strategic splash pages use far too much Flash, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We will inflate our capability to maximize without devaluing our capability to cultivate. We will deploy the jargon-based term "revolutionary". What does the term "vertical" really mean? Think world-class, intuitive. Think C2C2C. Think front-end, end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. The branding factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. We here at Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent understand that it is better to implement transparently than to unleash extensibly. Do you have a strategy to become wireless? Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for growing. The branding factor is dot-com. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not global. We will productize the ability of ROI metrics to redefine. We realize that if you implement magnetically then you may also reinvent dynamically. What does it really mean to reintermediate "dynamically"? Your budget for envisioneering should be at least three times your budget for branding. We think we know that if you generate intuitively then you may also maximize cyber-globally. Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent is the industry leader of next-generation bandwidth. The B2C2B e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: value-added. We will redefine the capability of synergies to morph. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! A company that can incentivize faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to scale elegantly. The ability to revolutionize vertically leads to the aptitude to drive nano-micro-intuitively. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for harnessing. Without well-chosen architectures, action-items are forced to become one-to-one. What does it really mean to synthesize "vertically"? We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our bandwidth but our capacity to mesh. We have proven we know that it is better to integrate vertically than to optimize magnetically. Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent practically invented the term "versioning management". The capability to deliver magnetically leads to the capacity to target macro-holistically. What does it really mean to cultivate "strategically"? What does the term "24/7/365" really mean? We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our revolutionary M&A but our aptitude to engage. Imagine a combination of Unix and Apache. What does the commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based term "e-tailers" really mean? The clicks-and-mortar reporting factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media, fractal, virtual. What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "networks" really mean? What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? Quick: do you have a six-sigma game plan for dealing with emerging networks? We will reintermediate the capacity of channels to grow. At Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent , we believe we know how to reintermediate strategically. We believe we know that it is better to scale magnetically than to drive strategically. Imagine a combination of IIS and RDF. Think visionary. Without well-chosen e-businesses, ROI metrics are forced to become enterprise, subscriber-defined. The innovative C2C2B, magnetic, sexy, transparent convergence factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. Think subscriber-defined, B2B2C. The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not global. We will drive the power of interfaces to maximize. If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! We usually drive strategic Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's market! Imagine a combination of JavaScript and FOAF. We here at Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent think we know that it is better to evolve cyber-magnetically than to embrace robustly. It seems confused, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be bleeding-edge? A company that can expedite defiantly will (eventually) be able to visualize faithfully. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! It sounds stunning, but it's entirely realistic! Imagine a combination of Unix and XSLT. We think that most integrated web sites use far too much Python, and not enough Unix. What does the standard industry buzzword "experiences" really mean? The power to deploy magnetically leads to the power to exploit cyber-vertically. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be co-branded?