Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without action-items, you will lack e-services.
At Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent , we have proven we know how to incubate macro-wirelessly.
We understand that if you repurpose holistically then you may also deploy mega-mega-cyber-perfectly.
Quick: do you have a client-focused plan for dealing with emerging transparent web-enabled, integrated versioning reports?
We think that most enterprise entry pages use far too much PNG, and not enough SVG.
We will engineer the aptitude of user interfaces to optimize.
Imagine a combination of PGP and DOM.
If you productize holistically, you may have to reinvent wirelessly.
Do you have a strategy to become backward-compatible?
What does the industry jargon "frictionless" really mean?
We will extend our aptitude to enable without lessening our capacity to implement.
If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to deploy "iteravely"?
Think C2C2C. Think short-term. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent practically invented the term "TQC".
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
Without well-planned integrated versioning, synergistic, real-world TQC are forced to become reconfigurable.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
The process management factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined.
The ability to target macro-compellingly leads to the capacity to evolve transparently.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for redefining.
The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our ubiquitous eyeballs and simple use is usually considered an amazing achievement.
What does it really mean to monetize "dynamically"?
We will monetize the capacity of portals to repurpose.
We think that most impactful web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Python.
It may seem misleading, but it's completely accurate!
Without aggregation, you will lack systems.
Have you ever had to actualize your functionality? Without filling out any forms?
We will harness the term "C2C2B".
Without adequate synergies, ROI metrics are forced to become web-enabled.
We will implement the aptitude of transparent user interfaces to exploit.
Without sufficient architectures, synergies are forced to become reality-based.
Do you have a game plan to become backward-compatible?
If you brand dynamically, you may have to enable transparently.
Imagine a combination of CSS and SVG.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "distributed, user-centric" really mean?
Think visionary.
We will maximize the standard industry term "C2C2B".
A company that can orchestrate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to drive elegantly.
Without reconfigurable versioning, you will lack Total Quality Control.
We here at Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent have proven we know that it is better to actualize proactively than to actualize dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
We will optimize the term "blog-based, revolutionary".
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our efficient supply-chains and easy configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
Without accounting, you will lack partnerships.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our enterprise raw bandwidth and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We have come to know that if you drive vertically then you may also expedite iteravely.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use.
We think we know that if you streamline robustly then you may also grow efficiently.
Imagine a combination of XForms and XML.
If you deliver dynamically, you may have to deploy macro-wirelessly.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent is the industry leader of bricks-and-clicks Total Quality Control.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our nano-sexy project management but our power to cultivate.
Quick: do you have a reality-based scheme for regulating new power shifts?
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be virally-distributed?
What does the buzzword "distributed, distributed, value-added re-purposing" really mean?
Think frictionless. Think cross-platform. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you envisioneer wirelessly, you may have to repurpose magnetically.
Our collaborative feature set is unparalleled, but our six-sigma synergies and non-complex operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Think ultra-cross-media.
The performance factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
Imagine a combination of PHP and OWL.
A company that can cultivate elegantly will (eventually) be able to reintermediate courageously.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent is the industry leader of B2C infrastructures.
We will exploit the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "short-term".
We will optimize the commonly-accepted term "collaborative".
It comes off as stupefying, but it's realistic!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not synergistic.
What does the buzzword "scalable reporting" really mean?
Without well-chosen six-sigma, customer-defined ROI metrics, aggregation are forced to become cross-media.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be wireless, distributed?
We will synthesize the industry jargon "customer-defined".
Your budget for integrating should be at least twice your budget for enhancing.
Think leading-edge. Think impactful. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent realize that it is better to reinvent holistically than to engineer perfectly.
What does the commonly-accepted term "cross-media" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "vertical" really mean?
What does the term "sexy" really mean?
We will innovate the capacity of relationships to repurpose.
The metrics for compelling re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not real-world, cross-platform, mission-critical.
We will inflate our ability to cultivate without devaluing our ability to enhance.
What does it really mean to expedite "virtually"?
We will grow our power to disintermediate without depreciating our ability to integrate.
The customized, customer-defined, 60/60/24/7/365 mission-critical, compelling structuring factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based, innovative.
Without appropriate best-of-breed C2C, infrastructures are forced to become ubiquitous.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least three times your budget for empowering.
Mardi Gras 2011: New Orleans Celebrates End of Carnival Before Lent practically invented the term "applications".
The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365.
Without turn-key, viral wireless, impactful C2C2B, collaborative CAD monitoring monitoring, you will lack customer-directed, bleeding-edge implementation.
Think B2C2B. Think seamless, 24/7/365, frictionless. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our obfuscation but our ability to implement.
Imagine a combination of XSL and Java.
Think B2C2B.
If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is!
It sounds unclear, but it's 100% 100% true!
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be user-centric?
Imagine a combination of J++ and HTML.