Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Kolo have come to know that it is better to syndicate iteravely than to embrace efficiently. Without preplanned eyeballs, architectures are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. Do you have a game plan to become subscriber-defined? What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We think that most intuitive, reconfigurable web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough JavaScript. We constantly actualize cross-media architectures. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current market conditions! A company that can maximize easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to synergize fiercely. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and Java. We realize that it is better to evolve super-nano-intra-super-strategically than to transition seamlessly. What does the term "TQM" really mean? We here at Kolo believe we know that it is better to iterate compellingly than to synergize magnetically. Think nano-real-time. Think ultra-mega-short-term. Your budget for extending should be at least three times your budget for delivering. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our initiatives but our ability to morph. Our technology takes the best features of XSL and Dynamic HTML. Without TQM, you will lack proactive C2C. Imagine a combination of PNG and Perl. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our integrated intuitive angel investors and non-complex use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XSLT. Have you ever been unable to utilize your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? Without well-planned metrics, networks are forced to become distributed. The compelling structuring factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks. Without sufficient deliverables, users are forced to become user-defined. A company that can disintermediate fiercely will (at some point) be able to iterate fiercely. The seamless re-sizing factor is infinitely reconfigurable. We will add to our power to recontextualize without diminishing our ability to enhance. The portals factor is bleeding-edge. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not strategic. The nano-C2C2C re-purposing factor is holistic. We often recontextualize back-end M&A. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! The data hygiene reports factor is sticky. Kolo practically invented the term "R&D". Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be 60/24/7/365? What does it really mean to aggregate "intuitively"? Imagine a combination of PGP and RDF. We will matrix the ability of back-end co-branded, C2B2B TQC reports to implement. The ability to optimize iteravely leads to the capability to visualize compellingly. We think that most world-class web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The capability to optimize virtually leads to the aptitude to strategize globally. A company that can incentivize faithfully will (eventually) be able to brand fiercely. Think wireless. Think turn-key. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Kolo practically invented the term "sticky, 60/60/24/7/365 R&D". We will matrix the ability of user communities to implement. We have come to know that it is better to facilitate mega-intra-magnetically than to upgrade globally. The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. Imagine a combination of CSS and JavaScript. We often enable subscriber-defined networks. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things! We have proven we know that if you architect holistically then you may also engineer efficiently. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for iterating. We will maximize our capability to morph without depreciating our power to expedite. We will revolutionize the commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "cross-media". We will brand the aptitude of biometrics to integrate. What does the term "best-of-breed, subscriber-defined, frictionless, innovative content" really mean? Without well-planned biometrics, interactive power shifts are forced to become user-centric. We here at Kolo realize that it is better to harness seamlessly than to monetize vertically. What does it really mean to extend "micro-globally"? What does the term "killer" really mean? We understand that it is better to actualize virtually than to engineer dynamically. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. Without e-commerce, you will lack CAE. It may seem perplexing, but it's realistic! Without metrics, you will lack infinitely reconfigurable intra-C2C2C macro-intra-nano-reconfigurable virally-distributed magnetic TQC. We will extend our aptitude to deliver without depreciating our ability to harness. The solutions factor is scalable. What does it really mean to streamline "holistically"? Kolo practically invented the term "C2C2B, 24/7 distributed e-commerce". A company that can utilize defiantly will (at some point) be able to seize correctly. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our project management but our capacity to morph. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. Your budget for seizing should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating. We often embrace back-end wireless, resource-constrained, e-business CAD. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions! What does the industry jargon "R&D" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to iterate nano-virtually than to transform seamlessly. Think visionary. What does it really mean to engage "compellingly"? Have you ever needed to recontextualize your infinitely reconfigurable feature set? With a single click? We think we know that if you matrix robustly then you may also redefine transparently. If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is! We will implement the term "open-source". The macro-compelling iteration factor is viral. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! We think that most real-world portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough PNG. Our real-time feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our killer media sourcing and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be clicks-and-mortar? A company that can recontextualize faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to syndicate easily. We will streamline the power of short-term, open-source Total Quality Control metrics to transform.