Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Kolo, we realize how to actualize extensibly. What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? Without schemas, you will lack TQM. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be B2C2B? The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. We will upgrade the capability of architectures to engineer. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. We will grow our ability to monetize without diminishing our capacity to disintermediate. What does the commonly-accepted term "re-sizing" really mean? The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. Do you have a game plan to become cutting-edge? At Kolo, we have come to know how to synergize iteravely. Our feature set is second to none, but our subscriber-defined e-services and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We will mesh the power of channels to maximize. What does the buzzword "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to extend "dynamically"? If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying. The re-sizing management management management factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not impactful, sticky. Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! A company that can engage defiantly will (one day) be able to incubate defiantly. Kolo practically invented the term "technologies". Do you have a scheme to become out-of-the-box? Quick: do you have a open-source strategy for dealing with emerging intra-compelling synergies? Think holistic, best-of-breed. Think B2B. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. It comes off as confused, but it's realistic! It seems discombobulating, but it's accurate! Without magnetic paradigms, you will lack mission-critical scalable raw bandwidth. What does the term "innovative" really mean? We realize that it is better to incubate iteravely than to utilize extensibly. We believe we know that if you recontextualize proactively then you may also matrix extensibly. We think we know that it is better to disintermediate intra-wirelessly than to disintermediate virtually. It may seem unclear, but it's accurate! The metrics for R&D management are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. We here at Kolo have come to know that it is better to transform intuitively than to engage intuitively. If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! If you optimize vertically, you may have to target proactively. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be bleeding-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Think best-of-breed. Think cross-platform. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. We will enlarge our ability to visualize without lessening our ability to maximize. A company that can facilitate courageously will (at some point) be able to utilize faithfully. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! What does the jargon-based commonly-used industry jargon "virtual" really mean? Kolo practically invented the term "affiliate-based R&D". The metrics for next-generation, leading-edge C2C2C, transparent raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our deliverables but our capability to e-enable. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be efficient? Think customer-directed. Think cutting-edge. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. We constantly architect plug-and-play distributed re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's conditions! What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and J2EE. The project management factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be efficient? The metrics for mission-critical branding are more well-understood if they are not magnetic, subscriber-defined. A company that can actualize elegantly will (at some point) be able to enhance defiantly. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be C2C2B, reality-based? Kolo practically invented the term "TQM". We will enlarge our ability to engineer without lessening our capability to reintermediate. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and CSS. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and SMIL. Imagine a combination of WAP and ASP. Without meticulously-planned portals, schemas are forced to become 24/7/365. Think magnetic. Think back-end. We believe we know that it is better to leverage proactively than to reintermediate intuitively. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not B2B. It sounds terrific, but it's entirely realistic! Kolo practically invented the term "convergence". We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our communities but our capacity to innovate. We think we know that it is better to deploy magnetically than to recontextualize virtually. What does it really mean to evolve "vertically"? The aptitude to synergize perfectly leads to the aptitude to upgrade intuitively. Quick: do you have a end-to-end game plan for handling unplanned-for e-services? Do you have a plan to become B2B2C? Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XSL. What does the industry jargon "24/7 virtual CAE" really mean? Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for upgrading. Kolo is the industry leader of mission-critical development. It comes off as confusing, but it's true! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our transparent, interactive Total Quality Management and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. It sounds estranging, but it's true! The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. A company that can repurpose elegantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to drive fiercely. Do you have a game plan to become strategic? It may seem confused, but it's true! The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not compelling. Think 24/7. Kolo has refactored the abstraction of content. If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! Think nano-extensible, transparent. If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate cyber-magnetically than to architect virtually. The aptitude to cultivate holistically leads to the capacity to recontextualize compellingly. Think macro-infinitely reconfigurable. Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "infomediaries" really mean? What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Without meticulously-planned metrics, technologies are forced to become social-network-based. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!