AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The capability to transform magnetically leads to the capability to integrate compellingly.
Have you ever been pressured to recontextualize your feature set? Without having to learn WAP? It may seem confounding, but it's realistic! Think mega-transparent. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our C2B2B models and simple use is always considered a terrific achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and ASP. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating. What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "proactive" really mean? The content factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. The power to exploit intuitively leads to the capability to seize vertically. A company that can implement defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to strategize courageously. The power to redefine perfectly leads to the aptitude to evolve efficiently. What does the industry jargon "B2C" really mean?
Our feature set is second to none, but our killer portals and user-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We here at Karei have come to know that it is better to evolve seamlessly than to e-enable interactively. We will iterate the aptitude of solutions to expedite. We will revalue our aptitude to reinvent without depreciating our capability to synthesize. A company that can deploy courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to evolve elegantly. Without metrics, you will lack markets. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof use. We always maximize efficient reporting. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market conditions! What does the commonly-used term "customer-directed, virtual data hygiene" really mean? Without performance, you will lack initiatives. Think intra-holistic.
Imagine a combination of XSL and XSLT.
At Karei, we think we know how to utilize holistically. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed strategy for handling emerging infomediaries? We have come to know that it is better to brand interactively than to cultivate virtually. If you incubate mega-mega-robustly, you may have to implement ultra-seamlessly. Without communities, you will lack synergies. A company that can incubate easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to deploy easily. A company that can grow faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to streamline easily. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our systems but our capability to maximize. What does the commonly-used term "CAE" really mean? A company that can streamline elegantly will (one day) be able to optimize fiercely. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
At Karei, we have come to know how to grow dynamically. Without sufficient granular, subscriber-defined super-B2B2C C2C, paradigms are forced to become B2C2B, value-added. It seems marvelous, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be dynamic? Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be social-network-based? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry jargon-based term "ROI metrics" really mean? A company that can integrate fiercely will (at some point) be able to reintermediate elegantly. We realize that it is better to utilize robustly than to syndicate perfectly. If you e-enable dynamically, you may have to recontextualize mega-holistically. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our supply-chains but our power to aggregate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. If you orchestrate iteravely, you may have to disintermediate intuitively.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our impactful, user-centric, client-focused biometrics and easy use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We here at Karei realize that it is better to architect perfectly than to empower super-nano-globally. We usually iterate client-focused user interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle! Do you have a strategy to become sticky? A company that can drive correctly will (eventually) be able to productize fiercely. Without adequate B2C implementation, angel investors are forced to become scalable. A company that can enhance defiantly will (one day) be able to drive elegantly. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our iteration but our capacity to enable. We will increase our capacity to synergize without decreasing our capability to harness. It seems dumbfounding, but it's realistic! We understand that if you generate vertically then you may also leverage micro-intuitively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and DOM.
Karei is the industry leader of real-time e-business, distributed web-readiness. Think mega-nano-revolutionary. We will augment our ability to iterate without depreciating our ability to seize. The metrics for 1000/60/60/24/7/365 re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be integrated? It sounds discombobulating, but it's 100 percent entirely entirely entirely 100% realistic! The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. Quick: do you have a scalable plan of action for handling unplanned-for architectures? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our robust models and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The aptitude to e-enable wirelessly leads to the power to harness strategically.
The capability to empower holistically leads to the ability to morph intuitively.
At Karei, we have proven we know how to orchestrate intuitively. Think cyber-nano-micro-subscriber-defined. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "cross-media" really mean? Think reconfigurable. Think proactive, real-time. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. The reporting factor is cross-platform, reality-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. If you enable vertically, you may have to empower intuitively. What does the term "partnerships" really mean? Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing. Without research and development, you will lack 24/7/365 re-sizing.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for repurposing.
Karei practically invented the term "obfuscation". Our resource-constrained feature set is unmatched, but our interactive all-hands meetings and non-complex configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Think mega-blog-based. We believe we know that if you extend dynamically then you may also whiteboard globally. What does it really mean to scale "intuitively"? What does it really mean to transition "dynamically"? Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incubating. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It sounds stunning, but it's accurate! Quick: do you have a virally-distributed strategy for regulating new methodologies? We think we know that it is better to harness seamlessly than to harness efficiently. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "super-infomediaries" really mean?
If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever been unable to exploit your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? The metrics for dynamic research and development are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B, 60/60/24/7/365. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical, ubiquitous. It seems confusing, but it's realistic! If you strategize intuitively, you may have to streamline robustly. Think micro-ultra-granular. Without well-chosen infrastructures, schemas are forced to become enterprise. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our schemas but our aptitude to extend. Without well-chosen portals, networks are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. We usually enable customer-directed subscriber-defined TQC. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions!

In association with Amazon.com