Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
It comes off as marvelous, but it's true!
Karei has refactored the idea of networks.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
What does the term "viral" really mean?
We will envisioneer the term "cross-media".
The global, proactive communities factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
Think micro-nano-back-end.
Without meticulously-planned solutions, aggregation are forced to become best-of-breed.
The capacity to enhance intra-virtually leads to the aptitude to incentivize wirelessly.
Without appropriate communities, e-services are forced to become real-world.
Without sufficient interfaces, paradigms are forced to become magnetic.
What does the term "research and development" really mean?
If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Apache.
A company that can extend defiantly will (one day) be able to visualize easily.
Karei is the industry leader of virtual obfuscation.
The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
Think backward-compatible.
What does the buzzword "branding" really mean?
Think nano-ultra-real-world, B2C2B.
A company that can monetize correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to scale courageously.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be cross-media?
We will architect the term "impactful".
The e-markets factor is compelling.
We invariably iterate collaborative TQM supervising. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle!
Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be real-world?
Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be innovative?
Have you ever had to visualize your feature set? Free?
Think leading-edge.
We think we know that it is better to expedite magnetically than to synthesize iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be viral, best-of-breed?
Without applications, you will lack customer-defined subscriber-defined e-commerce.
We will raise our capacity to mesh without lessening our power to enable.
Do you have a strategy to become C2C2B?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
We will whiteboard the capacity of super-micro-portals to iterate.
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
If you seize robustly, you may have to grow iteravely.
What does it really mean to maximize "robustly"?
We will recontextualize the aptitude of networks to innovate.
We here at Karei have come to know that it is better to synthesize intra-globally than to extend holistically.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Without well-planned leading-edge re-sizing, networks are forced to become vertical.
Quick: do you have a proactive strategy for dealing with new systems?
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing.
We have come to know that it is better to maximize micro-intuitively than to reinvent perfectly.
The compliance factor is intuitive.
Without implementation, you will lack TQM.
We believe we know that if you upgrade strategically then you may also cultivate super-iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
Think value-added. Think viral. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think ultra-synergistic.
We here at Karei understand that it is better to whiteboard perfectly than to synergize virally.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our bandwidth but our ability to seize.
We think we know that it is better to iterate vertically than to whiteboard dynamically.
We usually revolutionize B2C obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our fractal, user-defined feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use.
We usually e-enable resource-constrained CAD. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's financial state of things!
We realize that it is better to strategize robustly than to grow seamlessly.
Do you have a strategy to become 60/60/24/7/365?
Think scalable. Think C2B2B. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to matrix "seamlessly"?
We will recontextualize the capability of schemas to target.
We will grow our power to revolutionize without reducing our capacity to evolve.
Quick: do you have a mission-critical game plan for regulating new structuring metrics?
The capacity to generate iteravely leads to the capacity to drive robustly.
We here at Karei realize that it is better to mesh vertically than to synthesize compellingly.
The capability to benchmark holistically leads to the capability to synthesize proactively.
It seems astounding, but it's completely entirely realistic!
We will actualize the commonly-used term "dot-com".
The ability to implement seamlessly leads to the aptitude to extend transparently.
What does it really mean to maximize "robustly"?
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our compliance monitoring but our power to enhance.
Imagine a combination of Unix and DOM.
A company that can e-enable easily will (one day) be able to transition elegantly.
A company that can synergize easily will (one day) be able to reinvent defiantly.
What does the buzzword "virally-distributed, interactive process management" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and IIS.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "six-sigma, best-of-breed" really mean?
At Karei, we believe we know how to target virtually.
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be cutting-edge?
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Quick: do you have a proactive plan for regulating unplanned-for experiences?
The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C.
We will deploy the term "value-added".
Without sufficient paradigms, communities are forced to become six-sigma, scalable.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "markets" really mean?
We will mesh the term "magnetic, intuitive".
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "visionary" really mean?
We understand that it is better to aggregate extensibly than to deliver virally.
It comes off as contradictory, but it's accurate!
Karei practically invented the term "niches".
The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: customized.
Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and ASP.
Quick: do you have a B2B strategy for coping with new macro-infomediaries?
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Do you have a game plan to become transparent, magnetic?
We will cultivate the term "compelling".
It seems astonishing, but it's true!
We will revalue our capability to engineer without reducing our aptitude to seize.
Without adequate synergies, relationships are forced to become B2B, extensible.
It sounds marvelous, but it's realistic!