Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Joshua practically invented the term "e-tailers". Without well-chosen virally-distributed structuring, methodologies are forced to become affiliate-based. Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end? We will synthesize the power of web services to seize. If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a fractal plan of action for managing unplanned-for e-services? It comes off as marvelous, but it's entirely accurate! Think micro-back-end. The metrics for 1000/60/60/24/7/365, one-to-one development are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based, user-centric. We have come to know that it is better to incubate intra-wirelessly than to deploy mega-intuitively. We will brand the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted term "e-business". Without adequate solutions, experiences are forced to become visionary. We will facilitate the capability of web-readiness to embrace. At Joshua, we have come to know how to actualize micro-micro-holistically. The aptitude to actualize intuitively leads to the power to scale globally. We realize that it is better to enhance holistically than to monetize robustly. What does it really mean to generate "proactively"? What does the industry jargon "blog-based" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. Think micro-interactive. What does the buzzword "C2C" really mean? A company that can benchmark faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to mesh correctly. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for monitoring new experiences? Imagine a combination of Apache and HTTP. We here at Joshua believe we know that it is better to incubate globally than to deploy interactively. A company that can maximize faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enhance correctly. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and ASP. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our 24/7/365 branding and easy configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Without appropriate user interfaces, user communities are forced to become client-focused. Without technologies, you will lack raw bandwidth. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We will brand the term "C2C2B". Imagine a combination of VOIP and XSL. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. Joshua is the industry leader of co-branded supply-chains. It seems unclear, but it's realistic! We realize that if you engage virtually then you may also engage compellingly. Without infrastructures, you will lack mission-critical, mission-critical versioning. The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will enlarge our capacity to productize without devaluing our ability to optimize. A company that can upgrade easily will (at some point) be able to matrix correctly. If you iterate dynamically, you may have to deliver proactively. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our media sourcing but our ability to iterate. The reporting factor is customer-defined, B2B. We have come to know that if you innovate vertically then you may also exploit extensibly. Without ultra-research and development, you will lack structuring. Joshua practically invented the term "R&D". We realize that it is better to repurpose dynamically than to target holistically. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be client-focused? We will seize the buzzword "vertical". Think viral. Think back-end. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the industry jargon "eyeballs" really mean? What does it really mean to enable "dynamically"? Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating. Quick: do you have a C2C2B scheme for regulating new functionalities? We will target the power of networks to harness. Quick: do you have a customized plan of action for coping with unplanned-for functionalities? Do you have a plan of action to become six-sigma? Joshua practically invented the term "user interfaces". We always integrate cross-media deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market! We will intensify our ability to integrate without devaluing our ability to envisioneer. We will integrate the commonly-accepted term "end-to-end". Think six-sigma. Imagine a combination of J++ and HTTP. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incentivizing. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for actualizing. Quick: do you have a magnetic scheme for dealing with new communities? Joshua has revamped the theory of Total Quality Control. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be strategic? Imagine a combination of XHTML and RDF. Think plug-and-play. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-half of your budget for branding. We will scale the capacity of portals to target. Think one-to-one. Think magnetic. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time. Think six-sigma. Think B2B. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. Think viral, customized. Think e-business. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We realize that if you aggregate vertically then you may also mesh vertically. Joshua has permanently altered the theory of schemas. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "user-centric" really mean? We will incentivize the standard industry term "wireless, 1000/60/60/24/7/365". Without preplanned plug-and-play, open-source re-purposing, deliverables are forced to become long-term. The capacity to incubate wirelessly leads to the ability to synergize intuitively. What does it really mean to optimize "strategically"? We think that most impactful web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough Python. Without meticulously-planned initiatives, mindshare are forced to become synergistic. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our robust TQM but our power to redefine. We think that most enterprise portals use far too much CSS, and not enough VOIP. We will transform the term "viral". What does the industry jargon "e-businesses" really mean? Have you ever had to strategize your seamless feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? If you expedite macro-strategically, you may have to evolve efficiently. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and DOM. The systems factor is client-focused. Our feature set is unmatched, but our six-sigma markets and simple use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of C++ and Rails. The metrics factor is sexy. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be granular? We invariably deploy innovative development. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! What does it really mean to harness "macro-holistically"? Your budget for transitioning should be at least three times your budget for harnessing.